Axelrod: Bank Bonuses Are ‘Offensive’
In the wake of reports that Goldman Sachs is set to pay a record 23 billion in bonuses this year, the President’s Senior Adviser David Axelrod told me this morning that he thinks big banks dishing out bonuses to their employees is “offensive” and advises banks to “think through what they are doing.”
“The bonuses are offensive and to the firms that still have federal TARP money there’s some jurisdiction, the pay master of Treasury is working on trying to limit that,” Axelrod said. “You’ve seen a lot of firms go to stock rather than cash, so at least people have a stake in the success of their company and they’re not just walking away with cash-making short-term decisions.”
“They ought to think through what they are doing and they ought to understand that a year ago a lot of these institutions were teetering on the brink and the United States government and taxpayers came to their defense. They have responsibilities and they ought to meet those responsibilities.”
Watch our full exchange HERE.
- George Stephanopoulos
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
This is not only offensive, it is CRIMINAL !
Thank you George for staying on top of this story, and bringing it up for questioning with Mr. Axlerod.
You and Paul Kruegman (and today, even E.J. Dionne) seem to be the only
’rounders’ with their feet firmly planted in a little land called REALITY.
Posted by: Jeff Jamiolkowski | October 18, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Mr. Axelrod accurately commented on the issue of Wall Street bonuses. The reason these bank and fund managers are paid such enormous bonuses is that they have a hard job, and its a very competitive environment, so everyone wants the best talent and thus keeps the best managers with large bonuses. For the most part, these people deserve their bonuses because they are doing what most others cannot. The outrage belongs with those banks and funds who still owe TARP money. Those banks, funds, and managers have obviously not done their job and do not deserve a reward. Leave it to a key Democrat to say what the media will not, and target exactly where the indignation belongs instead of simply creating outrage for the sake of a story.
Posted by: Jonathan Prather | October 18, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I just heard Axelrod’s comment (on Stephanopoluos’) that Fox news doesn’t present the news.This comment amazed me.The sad fact is they’re about the only network that does. He also said “they” would appear on Fox news…really?Obviously “if you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen” applies to “their” absence on the various Fox news programs.
Posted by: janice johnson | October 18, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
I do not find this offensive at all. Those billions will now be spent hopefully in our economy keeping construction workers , restraunteurs , hairdressers, car sailspersons, boat makers, clothiers and the like EMPLOYED. That money finds its way back to the people, unlike taxes that go to the government never to be seen or heard from again. Go capitalism yeah!!!
Posted by: hil | October 18, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Another embarrasment for the Obama administration! We taxpayers dont want their stock Axelrob we want our cash back to pay down this 1.4 trillion dollar deficit. What happened to everyone needs to be fiscally responsible that obama demanded yet they dont demostrate it!
Posted by: rick | October 18, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Why doesn’t Goldman Sachs donate $350,000,000 to rebuild the Katrina devastated hospital that New Orleans. You could convince them that it would be a great tax right off…..
Come on Goldman Sachs….give back a little.
Posted by: Holly Berry | October 18, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Bank bonuses are aggressively and deeply offensive. That said, Obama enabled them by giving them some of the money they gave away. At this point, he’s just as dirty-handed as Bush.
Posted by: jan | October 18, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
The Obama administrations allowed the bonus with the TARP funds, now they are appalled?? Give me a break! Sounds like they are trying to cover for their incompentence!
Posted by: david | October 18, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
The White House is upset over Wall Street Bonuses. What a laugh,Obama signed the stimulis which contained AIG Bonuses,put in by his buddy Chris Dodd and pushed by Pelosi so no one could read it. The White House needs to take the responsibilty for its action,and stop whinning. They are the ones who did not put oversight controls on the spending.
Posted by: marion | October 18, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
These actions by the banks is fuel for the fire that will lead to some type of civil unrest between the have’s and have not’s.The divide between rich and poor is growing each and every day and history shows us that conflict between the two is usually the outcome with dire consequences.
Posted by: willy | October 18, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
George, Mr. Axelrod repeatedly stated that Obama objective is to provide more competition in our heath insurance industry, yet you never once asked him why the White House will not consider allowing people to buy insurance across state lines. By allowing interstate competition, customers would have more choices. For example, I’ve read that the identical coverage for a typical family in NY state costs 2 or 3 times what it costs for the same family in Wisconsin.
Allowing people to custom tailor a policy to suit their individual needs is another way that costs could be brought under control while providing more competition. Given that some states mandate specific types of coverage across-the-board in all healthcare policies, folks that don’t need or want these specific coverage’s (such as mandatory maternity benefits for seniors, or drug or alcohol rehab for non-drinkers, or even hair implants!) shouldn’t have to pay for them.
Another alternative would be to change the tax law to allow the deductibility of health care coverage for individuals buying their own coverage versus the government’s emphasis on employers providing coverage for their workers. Providing a tax deduction to individuals could provide a solution for the portability issue by allowing a worker to buy his/her coverage through their industry association, or their church or civic organization, instead of through their employer, and receive the same tax benefit that employers currently receive.
Axelrod says that the administration wants more competition, but their solution is only to provide a ‘one size fits all’ government run option with no choices other than to join their group or ‘pay a fine’
Posted by: Adakin Valorem | October 18, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
You Know what is more offensive is that the Bush and Obama administration gave $$$$$ to these scoundrels. Greed and decadence is not the only reason why we are in a hole. The main reason is because we have been sleep walking while a few powerful white guys have been manipulating the world because they think that they are GODS and we little people who are their slaves need to be manipulated because we are just a bunch of 2by4s to them. The blue bloods of the world are ruling us and will continue to rule us until we wake up from our narcotic state of mind. “It is better to die standing then live on my Knees’.–Emiliano Zapata. Wake up and adopt this way of life and tomorrow you will start to feel better and see things with a clearer eye. The Banks are only doing what they need to do and that is to clense the NARCO $$$$$s.
Posted by: cony007 | October 18, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
What is really offensive is that you had to ask every question at lease 3 times to get him off his spin but he did finally get it in [ITS BUSHES FAULT]
Posted by: earl | October 18, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Sounds like Axelrod is jealous he couldn’t get a job with a company that pays big bonuses.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | October 18, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
You just lost a long time TV viewer….. TOO MANY ADS. Will boycott the AD buyers and “watch” future shows on the internet.
Posted by: Carol | October 18, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Wonder if these bonuses are being doled out because they are soon to fail and they want to get the money now before they topple?
Posted by: phantomniter | October 18, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
It’s all Dubya’s fault? I remember getting a check made out to me from a President. I also remember the next President giving hundred of billions of money we don’t even own to the very people who squandered their own money. Tell me again how I’m supposed to accept this “Change”. This country has made another abominable choice for President. I’m not sure we can afford another like this current idiot. We certainly can’t afford the one we have.
Posted by: WhatChange? | October 18, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
So Goldman Sachs paid out $23 Billion in bonuses… in a city that charges income taxes, a state that charges income taxes on top of a nation that charges income taxes. So upwards of 60% of that $23 Billion went not to the workers that EARNED the bonuses, but to TAXES. And that doesn’t even count the tens of billions in tax revenue collected on the dividends paid out to Goldman shareholders or the corporate taxes that were directly paid by this firm.
At 11:31:10 AM, “Holly Berry” asked: “Why doesn’t Goldman Sachs donate $350,000,000 to rebuild the Katrina devastated hospital that New Orleans.”
Holly, get a clue. The taxes paid out from the Goldman bonuses amounted to more than $13.8 Billion… which is 39 times more than the $350m amount you say should be spent on a town that has already benefited from tens of billions of our tax dollars.
I live in Charleston, SC (remember Hugo?). Where was clamor for the fed to come help us back then? We climbed out of our situation ourselves… so get over it. You’ve already gotten your pound of flesh from our nation’s taxpayers.
Posted by: Adakin Valorem | October 18, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
No bounus payout till the TARP money is paid back. They can give them stock warrants just like we the taxpayers hold. If the company recovers and pays back the TARP loans, then their warrants get paid. If not they are worthless. Everyone says they need incentives, there you go. I don’t even care if you make the warrants enormous. Just pay the people who bailed them out first.
Posted by: moby | October 18, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Adakin,
If you really believe their tax rate is 60% then I have some land on the moon I would like to talk to you about. There is no way they paid more then 20% and you know it. Even Buffet’s tax rate is lower than 20%.
I do agree with your Charleston comment, New Orleans should be allowed to die given its location. It is like pouring money into the ocean.
Posted by: moby | October 18, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
When banks charge 23-27% for credit card rates and pay nothing for savings and checking account users along with fees for everything, it is criminal and congress approves of all it just as the approve of the health insurers getting away with murder. There are 3 classes of people in the country.
1.Bankers, politicians and insurers 2. middle class, homeowners who pay taxes. 3. the poor. The bottom 2 have no influence on the country or our taxes. The middle class under Obama, will keep shouldering the tax burden and banks will continue their parasitic ways and congress will continue living in their castles with their free medical and huge pensions. Remember the french revolution… maybe it’s time for America.
Posted by: Barry | October 18, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Moby,
Warren Buffett, like all the shareholders of Goldman pays capital gains tax (15%) on their dividend earnings. On the other hand, “bonuses” (at least the bonuses I see on my W-2) are taxable at ordinary income tax rates where the max fed rate is just under 40%, NY State rate is around 8-10% and the city’s income tax rate on earners in that bracket is over 5%. If you also consider the property and sales taxes paid by these GS workers employed in downtown NYC, one can easily see how 60% of gross earnings can go toward paying taxes.
Now about that moon property Moby has for sale :-)
Has anyone noticed that in the same week that PresBO is awarded the Nobel
“Peace” Prize, he unilaterally attacked and bombed another planet and increased troop deployment to Afghanistan by over 13000?
Posted by: Adakin Valorem | October 18, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Janice get real..they have spent half of the stimulus bill and were able to create or keep only 30,000 jobs which equates too 500,000 per job. At that rate we cant afford for them to try to create any more jobs.
Posted by: ted | October 18, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
BRAVO GOLDMAN SACHS! THE MARKETS WILL PREVAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: The Bottom Line | October 18, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
So where is the pay czar these days Axelrod?
Posted by: LongT | October 18, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
As a business owner who has worked 7 days a week 15 hours a day to keep a corp from falling behind in the recession and who pays high taxes,I think that it is insane to hear from some of you,that any talent in the current economy justifies Millions of Dollars bonuses. I think that as an executive, it is a duty and an ethical responsibility to be reasonable and forgo personal greed.
Since we tax payers basically financed the stabilization of bank, why wasnt there a provison that the profits made this year thanks to the 3500 DOW gains should be redistributed to suffering tax payers? Those “talented” wall street honchos got us in this mess and thanks to MAerican taxpayers they still have a job, their investments have gone back up , their 401Ks are up, when is enough indeed enough?
How much money does one need to accumulate when the regular folks who financed these guys recovery have to go to sleep at night wondering how they will feed their household? Have we learned nothing from this mess?
This blatant “talent ” bs is enough.
Posted by: Christine | October 18, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
As a business owner who has worked 7 days a week 15 hours a day to keep a corp from falling behind in the recession and who pays high taxes,I think that it is insane to hear from some of you,that any talent in the current economy justifies Millions of Dollars bonuses. I think that as an executive, it is a duty and an ethical responsibility to be reasonable and forgo personal greed.
Since we tax payers basically financed the stabilization of bank, why wasnt there a provison that the profits made this year thanks to the 3500 DOW gains should be redistributed to suffering tax payers? Those “talented” wall street honchos got us in this mess and thanks to MAerican taxpayers they still have a job, their investments have gone back up , their 401Ks are up, when is enough indeed enough?
How much money does one need to accumulate when the regular folks who financed these guys recovery have to go to sleep at night wondering how they will feed their household? Have we learned nothing from this mess?
This blatant “talent ” bs is enough.
Posted by: Christine | October 18, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
bank bonuses r offensive- the current administration and ruling party are offensive! spending money they dont haev, putting the consitutents who are losing jobs, losing money in teh stock market and losing value in our currency. all thanks to YOU
Posted by: realman1963 | October 18, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
As anyone looked into the bonuses that the Obama administration has given to the senior people that are working for them. I bet everyone would be surprised at how much these people make in bonuses every year. I do not believe it is wrong to give bonuses. But they do have to be earned. Some of the exec’s have not earned these bonuses, or at least that is the way the Obama administration see it.
Posted by: Lara | October 18, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
The relationships that exists between our government and financial institutions makes Hugo Chavez look like a saint! We the people are disgusted that we just witnessed the largest transfer of wealth in our Nation’s history. From taxpayers pockets to banks and their executives. Further, no one can account for were the money is. here is a clue, start with Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. Better yet, talk with Paulson and Bair.
Posted by: Jerry Simonian | October 18, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“So where is the pay czar these days Axelrod?” asks LongT
He’s busy ordering the CEO of Bank America to work without salary or bonuses for the past year…Yup, our first Black President’s Pay Czar is an advocate of endentured slavery by making someone work for no compensation.
I keep trying to find section in my copy of the Constitution where the executive branch as that power. Can anyone help?
Posted by: Adakin Valorem | October 18, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
So are bank bailouts. What do you think these narcissistic sociopaths were going to give themselves. Give me a break Axelrod.
Posted by: Huh | October 18, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
WHY is it these banks are getting money at near zero interest and lending it out at up to 90% interest? And then there are 22 thousand payday loan stores crippling working men and women just because they need money to fix their auto? So the banks consider this success and dump money on these short-sighted managers? This is damaging America, Usury is the number one reason many past great nations no longer exist.
Posted by: Disgusted | October 18, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Aren’t the Liberals in the majority? Isn’t Obama a Liberal? Do they no longer have a mandate from the American voters (remember the midterm elections)? Can’t they just do what they always do best; change the rules? There’s all this faux outrage followed by a failure to act. Do something or shut up already! What good is your super-majority if you can’t govern!
Posted by: s | October 18, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
More offensive are the salaries ($176,000/year) of our 535 Senators and Congressmen all of who have very decent pensions, fringe benefits and yes healthcare. They are nothing but a bunch of hypocritical liars, and yes let’s not forget Obama and all of his Czar’s and Special Advisors like Mr. Axelrod as well.
Posted by: wizcat123 | October 18, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
The Government does not create real jobs, the economy does and Obama has done nothing to stimulate the economy. If he really had wanted to stimulate the economy he would have cut taxes on small business by 10 or 15% and we all would have been a lot better off today. Let’s face it Governemnt loves to have control over us the middle class and spend our tax dollars left and right on their socialist pet projects, but they never fix anything.
Posted by: wizcat123 | October 18, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Axelrod and Obama are both hot air bags. What they think doesn’t matter to me for I know they will do their worst for all American people. To close the jail in Cuba takes signature. To get rid of don’t ask don’t tell takes a signature. Let them blame that on Bush for they also for blame everything else even losing the Olmpics.
Boy are we in for ride a lot like the old fool Carter gave us. God help us all.
Posted by: a citizen | October 18, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Axelrod is offensive!! Saying Fox News is not a news station!! Give me a break– How stupid does he think we are!? WH talking points!!! The enemy list just like Nixon is activated in the WH. I like to watch Chris, George and that gray haired guy on Sun. am but won’t if you keep having Axelrod saying stupid things like that and not rebutting! This Administration is scary and crybabies and it makes me long for the Clintons who I did not like too much. Remember George this is the same arrogant Pres. who put you down for stating a definition! All the mainstream media is in the WH pocket–be fair.
Posted by: krista amason | October 18, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Random thoughts…
“Thank God for Term Limits!”
“Support the politicians that supports the FairTax!”
“The best ‘stimulus’ proposal was from Rep Gomert; Give every worker a ‘tax holiday’ for six months… No income or FICA taxes and No Withholding… Instantly everyone will see their whole paycheck. For those of us in the 25% tax bracket (plus 7.65% FICA) we’d all see a 50% increase in our take-home pay (since 25+7.65 is around 33% which is 50% of the amount you are bringing home now)
Yup… 50% pay raise for everyone…
That’s the kinda stimulus I’m talkin’ about!
Posted by: Adakin Valorem | October 18, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
It’s disgraceful that these guys make all this money…and whats worse is they will probably blow it all on expensive houses and huge pools and maids and cars and football teams and hookers and booze. Right after they pay all those taxes that come out of those bonuses. Damn these wall street tycoons!
Posted by: Don | October 18, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
The deception of American Capitalism can be better understood by reading “The Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look At The Federal Reserve” by G. Edward Griffin.
Posted by: DeepThinker4U | October 18, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Think about what they’re doing? I’m sure they DID think about it. Just like how they thought about what they did to the banking system before they gambled everyone’s money away.
Why are these guys not in jail?
Posted by: Hosfac | October 18, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Certainly all Marxist like Axelrod find the entire concept of a bonus offensive. Note note though that multi-million dollar celebrity salaries and big west coast mansions don’t fall under this scorn, only adoration. Where’s the BS czar?
Posted by: TheAmalgamator | October 18, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Gee Mr. Axelrod, Bank bonuses are offensive?!?! So is giving out unqualified mortgages for years, by your own Barney Frank who brought down millions in retirees money in the stock market.
Posted by: Anna | October 18, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Socialism IS offensive. It kills personal initiative and makes slaves of us all. Government is not the answer but it’s usually the problem.
Posted by: fedup_11 | October 18, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
======================
What’s offensive are politicians with million dollar book deals, selling our on their integrity and country.
======================
And how about the salaries of liberal Hollywood actors, rock musicians and athletes – who contribute nothing to society.
======================
This socialist/communist administration is out to create class warfare between corporations and workers.
Posted by: N Waff | October 18, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
I’m of the opinion that if Congress would do what they should, and audit the Fed, the real circus would begin. Ron Paul 2012.
Posted by: Jake | October 18, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
As someone who was just a peon in many financial institutions who got no bonuses or salary increases for the hard work I put in on getting business in either in the savings or the loan side. How many people get laid off so that these clowns who make poor financial decisions get bonuses for running the company in the ground? The worst thing is that this type of behavior shows up when we have a crisis about every 20 to 30 years. Look at the savings and loans shoddy and illegal business practices which made the FSLIC go bust and all the savings and loans became banks with the same results now for the FDIC. Will the FDIC survive this? It is not clear but I do know that the funds that it needs to close down banks are getting low. How do I know about the FSLIC failure? I was employed by a savings and loan which was shut down on a Friday evening and reopened as a different savings and loan on Monday morning. I was suppose to be off that Friday an hour earlier but for some reason had to stay and was told at the time of closure that we (the workers) had no job anymore and were lucky that the institution who bought us would still employ us (note: The new owners did not buy the loan portfolio of the shut down business). I was loaned to the RTC (Resolution Trust Corporation) to take money from accounts that were not insured properly maybe it was at the minimum $250 to $750, I also took one account that was over $100,000 because the ownership exceeded $100,000 limit. While I was working at the location which was previously the main offices for the failed one, they were finding loan documents all over the property even in the restrooms and I know that they could not find them all. It did not always work out for the employees in other take overs. Who took the old business down? Those who controlled the business, the executives who accepted the rotten loans which artificially boosted what the earnings of the company for them to receive higher bonuses. If that is not looting what is, these were the great individuals who if they left the institution would be hard to replace. If I was a lowly employee and did half the crap that those in management did, I would be fired yet they keep these people on who knew fair well what they were doing to the company.
Posted by: Rachel M | October 19, 2009, 1:51 am 1:51 am
I believe that much of this money rally should have been returned to the share-holders. They are, in the end, the ones who own the company.
And, most of the shares in these companies are owned by pension funds, particularily municipal pension funds.
So, most of this money should have been distributed as dividends. That would have gone a long way toward making the pension funds solvent.
Posted by: Vincent Anthony Ettari | October 19, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Someone please let the government know that “we the people” are not completely blind. When media drawn attention brings light to such appauling issues there will be a certain level of inflation to the facts. News has to sell right? With that aside, there is only so much makeup you can use to cover the blemish you have created. Confess to your mistakes and give us the appropriate actions we as tax payers so honestly deserve. Truth be told, you are all biting the hand that feeds you and many other empires have fallen for following the same path. “Leadership is a privilege to better the lives of others. It is not an opportunity to satisfy personal greed.” – Quote by Mwai Kibaki
Posted by: dfwwm31 | October 19, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am
The bank bonuses are offensive, but even more offensive is that fact that the British simply banned them, saying large bankers bonuses encouraged extreme risk-taking, and our government has done NOTHING.
Axelrod’s statement is like the mother of a spoiled brat apologizing for her kids bad behavior.
DO something about it, White House!
Posted by: The_Mick | October 19, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am
This is beyond offensive, it is obscene. Goldman Sachs, just like the others received federal bailout money which they used to fatten their company’s nest. Whether or not Goldman Sachs was in financial trouble or not. If we had a financial meltdown, with Citibank, BOA, AIG going belly up, Goldman Sachs would have gone down the tubes too just like Lehman Bros. Especially so, when Goldman Sachs was one of the prime recipients of federal money that was given to them by AIG which received it from the federal bailout. Last but not least, Goldman Sachs, Wall Street, Banks and Insurance companies all operate much like a Ponzi scheme, they use other people’s money to make money and pay investors. If everyone who had money invested with Goldman Sachs, the banks, etc., wanted their money at the same time, Goldman Sachs would collapse as they do not have enough money to pay everyone. To suggest or say that these bonuses are deserving and needed to keep “talent”, is simply a pathetic excuse to rob the church box since nothing they have demonstrated indicates a talent so unique or of such incredible skill or knowledge that the company would fall without them. There are tons of people with MBA’s from some of the best schools that these same worms come from, that can just as well do the same job for real world wages. They have a job, pay them a salary that is in line with what we pay other similar, well paying professions. These kinds of bonuses simply are an afront and an insult to all working Americans. It is simply disgusting that they can even attempt to defend this. Regulate all these or we’ll soon find ourselves again in another crisis, much worse than any other.
Posted by: Jake | October 19, 2009, 6:20 am 6:20 am
P.S. If we allow Goldman Sachs and others to continue business as usual, then all we are doing is validating that same behavior that caused the financial crisis. Why is different from what Goldman Sachs is doing that Bernie Madoff did? Like Madoff, Goldman Sachs doesn’t have enough money to pay everyone off who wanted their money. However, they get a free pass because they are a company that is not privately owned. What difference does that make? What is the difference between what Madoff paid himself and what Goldman Sachs pays their CEO’s and other top management people? It is still the same, excessive and with other people’s money. They use investor’s money and the profits from those investments since without that they would not have any money, or even exists for that matter. Madoff does the same thing, he goes to jail, Goldman Sachs does the same thing and don’t because it’s labeled as bonuses to “employees”. Same thing with banks and their interest rates…Louie the loanshark charges 25% interest, he goes to jail, banks can charge 30% and up and don’t because they are a “bank”? All these guys are crooks, whether as individuals or as a company. This two sided standard has it’s roots in the favortism given to them by Washington and the bribes given to our representives by them. Yes, it’s a bribe, again the two sided standard being used, one a contribution, the other a bribe, same thing. They receive money from these special interest to do nothing or something for them and it’s called lobbying and contributions. A cop receives money for not doing something or for doing something and it’s called a bribe. Tell me the difference, please.
Posted by: Jake | October 19, 2009, 6:50 am 6:50 am
Why does George S.and Axelrod keep slamming Goldman. They were forced to take the tarp money, they didn’t need it. They have paid all the tarp money back along with billions of dollars in interest to the government. Axelrod never seems to mention that. It’s like highway robbery. Axelrod forgot to mention the bonuses that he, Pelosi, Reid, etc. are taking this year. They certainly aren’t cutting back.
Posted by: Dutchgirl | October 19, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
I think POLITICIAN pay and health benefits are obscene as well Mr. Axelhead. And – getting Ms. Pelosi her own plane, at the expense of the soliders in the field is obscene Mr. Axelhead. What a board of directors decides to pay their CEOs – I could care less about… If citizens don’t like it – they will move their business. It is NOT the business of the Govt to run. Stop throwing stones at glass houses, and police your own corruption Mr. Axelhead.
Posted by: clr | October 19, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
When it comes to being “offensive,” who would know more about it than Axelgrease… professional con-man and flim-flam artist.
Posted by: I.M.Pistov | October 19, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
I enjoy This Week and watch it each week. However this “interview” with Axelrod was annoying. Axelrod gave a speech, occationally interuped by Georges questions – which were completely ignored -and George allowed it. Sad. When a subject answers a questions from the press by responding, “the real question is…” you know you just allowed your subject to pivet to what they are there to sell and not respond to the question.
In all fairness, as much as I like George, his questions to Axelrod were phrased in such an extreme, George knew he would never get an acurate response. Next time I’m fast-forwarding to the Roundtable.
Posted by: Brix | October 19, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
He’s just pis*ed off that he’s not on that Gravy Train!
Posted by: Gunrunner | October 19, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Why don’t the Dems Go after the NAZI Collaborator George Soros’s money? In his own words he related in an interview that he pointed out the Jews to the NAZI’s in Hungery when he was a 15 year old. Wonder how many Men, Women and children he helped kill?
Posted by: Gunrunner | October 19, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Don’t you people know why AIG got the Money? Who do you think insures the The Senate and House Pensions? What a bunch of Maroons!
Posted by: Gunrunner | October 19, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Big banks have the money and thousands of lawyers because the US government gave it to them. Until it makes it to a court or bacomes a case this is just posturizing by Axelrod to make the public sheep complacient. Even then it will take years before it makes it anywhere.
If any typical business in the US collapsed the US Government would not bail them out. This is the reward to the US Taxpayer for helping the banking industry out, less dividends in your 401K and more money in their pocket. Thank your Senators and Representatives the next election.
Posted by: Funny Guy | October 19, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Like most pointy heady beaurocrats, who have never made an honest dollar, Axelrod doesn’t get it. The markets will work given the chance. Sure some limited amount of regulation is needed to make sure everyone plays fair, but after that, the government should stay out. We should applaud the banks for making such a fast turnaround.
Posted by: prone2xs | October 19, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Axelrod is one of Obama’s buddies from the Chicago Political Machine…you can pretty much take your clue from there.
Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
What’s offensive is that former Clinton White House staffer is taking instructions from current White House Occupant and refuses to report on the current WH communication director who is an admirer of one of the worst mass murderer of 20th century. Now that’s offensive!
Posted by: JB | October 20, 2009, 6:53 am 6:53 am
Back to the gutter, Gunrunner | Oct 19, 2009 3:23:28 PM
Posted by: Robin | October 20, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am
Get real Dutchgirl | Oct 19, 2009 8:37:37 AM – you are comparing ther yearly mega-lottery winnings of Wall Street to a politician’s remuneration? That’s the problem with Wall Street – they are massively out of touch with reality (and with the anger of Main Street)
Posted by: Robin | October 20, 2009, 7:19 am 7:19 am
If anyone actually thinks these bonuses will be spent in our economy they haven’t been paying attention to all the reports of how these bankers keep their money invested…they’re not going to spend much of it.
Furthermore, the “we have to pay them these bonuses to keep good talent” rallying cry is total BS – if this was the case, why is it that so many of these banks were so well run by this “great” talent, why did so many banks fail and need bailouts? These people are being paid bonuses they don’t earn or deserve. While their job may be difficult, it’s not that much more markedly difficult than mine to justify the obscene salaries and bonuses they earn.
The same is true of most every large corporation in the country…the everyday workers are the true engines behind the companies, yet they are getting paid less and less, while these greedy bums run the companies foolishly and collect huge sums of money
Posted by: ChrisInNH | October 20, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Mr. Axelrod accurately commented on the issue of Wall Street bonuses but what about all the Government favorites and kickbacks like Chris Dodd, getting his loan, Barney Franks and his personal Bank getting money, etc??
Posted by: ChicagoBob | October 20, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
I think all of you should be making exactly the same amount of money. Not me though, but all of you should. There is no way what you do can in anyway justify the amount pay you receive. You should all be grateful, and give your earning to the WH, because they, and ONLY they, know whats best. But not for me though, my salary is good where it is.
Posted by: dillholedemo | October 20, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Why doesn’t GEORGE ask some REALLY REALLY TOUGH QUESTIONS. This administration wants SOFTBALL questions asked, and if you do ask TOUGH QUESTIONS, they boycott you. What a bunch of THUGS…. they are controlling the media and LOVE EVERY MINUTE OF IT. We are being had…. they tell us what we want to hear, not what is the truth. Only Fox News DIGS deep and finds things that we Americans NEED to know. What happned to investigative journalism??? That is LONG GONE. What a sorry mess the major media outlets are. SCUM BAGS..
Posted by: Joy | October 20, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
It’s only offensive because he’s not getting it!
Posted by: Gunrunner | October 20, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
The big money that these folks are making are binding employment contracts. If the company fails as a reulst of thir ineptitude, they will be fired!!.. I was these people to make billions of dollars that they will use to buy stuff that puts people to work or these funds wil be invested so that other companies have funds to grow. This is economics 101!! They just want the class conflicts that will -iss you off!!
Posted by: arnold | October 20, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Sorry – “I WANT these people to make money, etc and “result from their ineptitude” -
Posted by: arnold | October 20, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I think the “O” word Mr. Axlerod was seeking is acttually “obscene”. These bank execs have no shame!
Posted by: DaveM | October 20, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
let them have their bonuses, just add a copy of the History of the French Revolution. 300 million poor hungry peasants can really mess up a rich persons day.
Posted by: jfabins | October 20, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
i’m not sure most people are aware that congress doesn’t “vote” themselves a payraise. actually, the law was changed a while back, and now they have to vote NOT to take a payraise, which is automatic. and guess what, they’re getting another payraise this year. i’m not saying it’s the same as the bank bonuses, but isn’t congress taking a payraise insulting?
Posted by: davidfrat21 | October 20, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
They pay themselves big bonuses because they can. The Board of Directors are happy to give away the stockholder’s money because there is nobody to stop them. Their stock is owned by millions of small investors through their 401K or mutual funds and they probably don’t even know they own them. The stock owners should sue the Board members for wasting their money.
The pay for executives has gotten outrageous because nobody is watching the store. The Board is made up of big time execs who want to continue the whole greedy system. The law should stipulate that each and every shareholder should have a vote on these executives. You cannot trust the Board to act responsibly obviously.
Posted by: drdale | October 20, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
First off, the fake outrage by team Obama needs to end. How many remember hearing the fact that the Obama Admin leanded on Chris Dodd to put a loophole into a spending package allowing for such payouts. Secondly didn’t Goldman Sachs repay their TARP funds? I know earlier this year I had read stories they were trying to pay it all back. If they have then the Obama Admin needs to stay away from this and needs to keep their mouths shut.
Posted by: mikemcdon321 | October 21, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am
They don’t deserve these fat bonuses. They haven’t learned a thing from last year. To use the “excuse” that these people are doing a hard job they need these bonuses to retain the employees is nothing but a sham. I ain’t buyin’ it and no one else should either. It’s pure and simple bull crap. There are plenty of people looking for jobs and they could find many college educated people to take these positions. Don’t tell me they can’t. And to those of you who commented on the economy and how the money will come back to us – DON’T MAKE ME LAUGH. They’re already stated that we’ll NEVER see all the money back. NEVER…………….
Posted by: Cindy | October 21, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Thanks Mr Axelrod for calling out Fox News. They are not a news organization, they are a wing of the republican Party. Indeed it can be argued that without a real leader in the Republican party, Fox has become the leadership. Its pathetic.
Axelrod is a big part of the team that kept us from living on road kill due to the depression we were about to enter at the hands of the Republicans.
Feaux New is not news, It is the Republicans opinion of the news.
20% of Americans now consider themselves Republicans and I know why.
Posted by: Rick | October 21, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Axlerod is a typical Democrat. He does not want anyone to succeed without help from the government. His ilk thinks that what is yours should be shared with everyone else, and you do not deserve bonuses. It is unfortunate that Democrats do not see the real truth in success. I do not mind big business giving out bonuses. how else do they retain management personal? Big business will never be allowed to succeed under the Democrat rule in Washington.
Posted by: Lara | October 21, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
News flash to current Administration; pick up a good dictionary, open to the page that lists the word ‘Hypocrisy’ and pay attention for a ‘change’. Obama certainly had no problem pandering for money from the same bankers he hypocritically helps and chastises in the same breath. We are not confused; attempts at manipulation and social engineering useless. This Administration can certainly boast about transparency; I can see right through them.
Posted by: Banderman | October 21, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Maybe it’s time they stopped holding interviews and press releases about it – and starting “acting” on it. Tying compensation to stock value started this whole mess as now the executive has motive to pump the value with little regard to long term viability. Business as usual…
Posted by: 1enlightened | October 21, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Moby…a bonus is taxed at 38% by the federal gov’t. That doesn’t count any state or local taxes. I doubt they would add up to 60% but it will probably be around 45-50% in totality.
Back to the topic at hand, it’s none of the government’s business what a private company payes their employees. Yes, you gave them money but you don’t own them. Here’s the lesson Mr Axelrod: don’t give them anymore money.
Is it absurd what they pay out in bonuses? Yes. But so are professional athletes’ pay/incentives and Hollywood actors and actresses. Where’s the outrage towards these “greedy” people?
Posted by: Independent63 | October 21, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Axelrod making any salary is offensive! Now there is a huge waste of money. I wonder if he ever received any bonus money throughout his career? I wonder……
Posted by: Survivor61 | October 21, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
These bonuses are akin to saying, “thanks for running us into the ground, and getting those taxpayer bailouts! Heres your cut!” I will never, ever, as long as I live, go to another large corporate “bailout” bank again. If this is how they treat the people who kept them in business, by raising our interest rates and still denying loans, handing out billions in bonuses for nothing less than driving themselves to the brink, than who needs them. Its a slap in the face, and a wake up call. This is capitalism at its worst.
Posted by: Klatu | October 21, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Offensive yes – so are sweetheart loan deals to US Senators who control the banking industry
Posted by: jamescbuilder | October 21, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Obama has ordered them to cut their pay if they where bailed out. The new socialist leader has struck. Next we will be ordered to stop drinking filtered water.
Posted by: Jim Rod | October 21, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Taxation without representation,,,,,,every cent they get is our tax dollars wasted and NO representation to show for it,,,,have they ALL forgotten history ?
Posted by: R. Taylor | October 21, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
The message from the White House inre to castigating FOX is about intimidating the other news outlets. Watch, the next bit in this drama will be a major net will have some small inconsequential criticism of Obama to make it look good. Unfortunately much of the mainstream media already bows to the White House. I give Jack Tapper credit at ABC, he showed real guts bucking the Disney corporate line and going after Gibbs at the press conference the other day inre to FOX comments. Of course, ABC didn’t even run with the story their own reporter pursued. And obama accuses FOX of not reporting the news.
Posted by: country cuz | October 22, 2009, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Another 520,000 laid off today abc cbs cnn msnbc c/span 1 and 2 npr will tell us the economy is getting better forgot nbc the biggest who– we need more dems to destroy this country.
Posted by: DANIEL | October 22, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Last night Betsy Stark reported once again that with the cut in salary and bonuses these firms were worried about a “brain drain”. I can’t believe you let that one go by without a challenge. These people must live in a bubble. Such conceit and right of entitlement! Aren’t these the very brains that brought these companies to the brink of destruction? Do they honestly think that there aren’t other americans capable of turning these companies around? I say let those brains drain. We could use a fresh approach and perspective from someone outside of their inner circle. They are lucky to still have a job. I for one will be happy to see those brains go right down the drain
Posted by: Sheila | October 22, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
I think pro athletes on losing teams should get their outrageous salaries slashed. I am offended by pro athletes and movies stars who make over $20-$30 million year for just playing sports and acting in a movie or two. Really, $20 million for throwing and catching a ball? $20 million pretending to cry? I really think the Obama and the government needs to get the pro sports industry and the movie industry in control while the iron is hot
Posted by: John | October 22, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Let me get this straight, first they took my money (without my permission)and gave it to companies (without the consent of the stock holders, you know, the owners). Now they are telling those companies (most of which are still privately owned) how much to pay their executives. What we are witnessing is the hostile takeover of America. Jefferson always said the greatest threat to America would not come from the outside, it would come from within.
Posted by: FessupFed | October 22, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Cut the Bonuses to $0 so that they can’t donate to R & D fund raising parties.
Posted by: Freedom | October 22, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Just change the word from “bonus”to “fine”", please.
Posted by: dehai | October 22, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
How about the government slashing it’s own pay for helping us get in this spending mess!! What about the Freddie and Fannie bonusES paid and the Senators and Congressmen WHO supportED all those 100% laons for people who had no income, no job or the financial ability to own a home in the 1st place. Barney Frank & Maxine Waters to name a few. Get rid of all the Congressman & Senators and start over becuase they all have had part to play in this financial mess we find ourselves in!!!! HAVEN’T SEEN ANYONE IN CONGRESS TAKE A PAY CUT YET!!! What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!!!
Posted by: bob | October 22, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Can we claw back the pay the congress received when they screw up? I don’t care about party. How about the money the left and right made on any AIG or other bailed out companies.
They DO get paid with OUR money correct?
Oh shhhh shhhh that doesn’t work with anyone that the left ‘likes’. No no no its only who politicians demonize right?
What a idiotic political stunt. How about we but the entire congress UNDER OATH one at a time and question them SEPARATELY on what they each knew and did with this economic mess. Don’t let them see or hear each other in the process. The perjury charges alone should put the fear of US in them don’t you think.
Oh no no no the left would never agree to this the fantasy is ONLY the right can have greedy politicians. No we can’t destroy the illusion that the Dems of the 21st century are for the poor of middle class more than that GOP.
That would just be to damaging to the Dems self perpetuating mythology. What party would people join to ‘think’ they are ‘doing’ something or ‘helping’ someone. How will people sleep at night when their discussion is shattered regarding the Democrat party?
Is it time for someone to bash Bush again? Oh that’s right the GOP are greedy monsters right. OK just assume you are correct how does that make the Dems not just as inept or susceptible to greed or corruption as the GOP politicians???? It doesn’t? People just ‘think’ they are some how more human?
Wow what a wake up call independent hearings with arresting powers would be for so many.
Posted by: David from WI | October 23, 2009, 4:15 am 4:15 am