By Kristina Wong

Oct 15, 2009 6:32pm

‘Cadillac Tax’ Slammed in New Health Care Ad

ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: A proposed tax on high-cost health insurance plans, the so-called “Cadillac tax,” is blasted in a new television ad by a union-funded group called Health Care for America Now (HCAN). “We all know that America needs health-care reform,” says the ad’s narrator. “But there is a right way, and a wrong way, to pay for it.” “Some senators say they want to tax so-called ‘Cadillac health-care plans,” the narrator continues. “But those proposals will also tax the benefits of millions of middle-class workers.” Watch it HERE. HCAN’s ad, which is dubbed “Right Way,” urges Congress to limit new taxes to individuals who make more than $250,000 per year. Under the Finance Committee bill which was approved earlier this week, a 40 percent tax would be imposed beginning in 2013 on the portion of employer-sponsored health plans exceeding $8,000 for individuals and $21,000 for families. Citing a preliminary analysis by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, HCAN warns that the tax is projected to affect up to 40% of health plans by 2019. The tax would be levied on insurers — rather than individuals — but economists expect insurance companies to pass the cost of the new tax to consumers in the form of higher prices.  Supporters of the “Cadillac tax” see it not only as a revenue raiser but also as a way to restrain health spending. The idea is that individuals and businesses would be incentivized to look for cheaper health plans if expensive ones were taxed. Critics of the “Cadillac tax” worry, however, that it would hit middle-income union members who have foregone wage increases for generous health care benefits. Critics also worry that the tax would have an inequitable impact, falling harder on employers with older workforces or that happen to be located in high-cost regions of the country.  HCAN’s new ad will air for one week on national CNN and MSNBC, broadcast and cable in DC, and during Sunday political programs in select states.

User Comments

“economists expect insurance companies to pass the cost of the new tax to consumers in the form of higher prices.”
Of course they will, they have no competition. Now if there were a public option, you can bet they’d first look to cut their quarter-billion dollar lobbying budget and perhaps trim the millions of dollars their CEOs get before passing it along.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 15, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Health care reform that doesn’t eliminate heath insurance companies, entirely, is NOT reform.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 15, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

“Health care reform that doesn’t eliminate heath insurance companies, entirely, is NOT reform.”
Rick McDaniel | Oct 15, 2009 8:43:01 PM
Nonsense. There are many countries that have shown a private industry can flourish alongside a public option, sorta like how the the USPS doesn’t crush FedEx or UPS. It has proven an excellent way to drive down costs and improve overall service. Private industry makes their profit by being more efficient than the public option, and subsidies are given to people to spend on the public option or private option as they wish, creating a level playing field by keeping the public option an un-subsidized entity.
(This is, of course, the type of public option that has been proposed, hence the CBO’s assessment that in 10 years time 90% of workers would still be in private plans.)

Posted by: jhw539 | October 15, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

The unions were Obama’s special interest group and they should be careful what they wish for it is about to slap them in the face.

Posted by: Downwithsocialism | October 16, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.