Oct 4, 2009 11:28am
Cokie on Polanski: ‘Just Take Him Out and Shoot Him’
Our roundtable weighed in on the debate over Roman Polanski's arrest – should he face justice?
“Roman Polanski is a criminal, Roberts said. "He raped and drugged and raped and sodomized a child. And then was a fugitive from justice. As far as I’m concerned, just take him out and shoot him.”
You can watch it HERE on our Greenroom.
- George Stephanopoulos
Email
Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Pro-Obama?
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
I say, why did she go to Nicholson’s house with him alone after not liking the first photo shoot, and what kind of parents allow that? Maybe we should shoot them.
Posted by: LM | October 4, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
I could not agree more. He’s admitted his crime tho claims consensual but children cannot consent to be the victim of a crime. He’s disgusting – as are his sympathizers.
Posted by: Megan | October 4, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Obviously, Polanski thought he would get a free pass, and he didn’t. He was living in a bubble, and it’s finally popped. He should have stuck it out in France, but now he has to own up to what he did or did not do – i.e, he’s the same before the bar, and it’s time for the trial.
Posted by: Patrick | October 4, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
The producers would do well to remember that THIS WEEK has a long and distinguished record as a program in which issues are illuminated with informed opinion. Every time that Ms. vanden Huevel makes an appearance in the program she unfailingly diminishes this record. I have watched TW for many, many years with satisfaction undiminished except for the instances in which she appears. You can do better than to invite someone who, as is the case of Ms. vanden Huevel, obscures issues by personalizing them and who cannot stop herself from drafting other panel members into her sparring web: “I know, George, you won’t agree with me” (repeatedly), or “Matt, you’re wrong ,” or the many times in which the constitutional sky falls (today’s instance was on the subject of civilian oversight of the military). And that was just today (Oct. 4, 2009). If Ms. vanden Heuvel would apply her considerable talents to issues without the indicting asides, she would be a contributor to TW’s luster. So far, I see little evidence of this potential. In the interest of full disclosure, I’m a registered Democrat, voted for Mr. Obama, and remain supportive of his presidency, which I suspect puts me on similar sides of issues, but I would hope without self-righteousness and a demeaning tone.
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
I was about to express dispair over the hijacking of my favorite version of proffessional and informed debate by Katrina Vanden Heuvel and her low blow opening salvos followed by incessant rammbling until an informed panelist respnds with substance. Mark said it well enough. I would rather listen to Peggy Noonan’s emotive diatribes any day.
Posted by: Rob | October 4, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
The punditarati should always emphasize that Polanski pled guilty, and fled when he heard that the bargain was being nixed by the judge. You should infor the public that the judge does not make the deals, but can always disapprove them! And, in law, you can’t appeal a judicial decision as a fugitive.
You have to appear before the judge. So even if Polanski had a basis to appeal, he still must appear in the U.S.
before a U.S., or California judge
Posted by: Vince | October 4, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Give him a “radical bobbittization” and then a jury can decide how to punish him appropriately….. :)
Posted by: Anon | October 4, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
And since when has George Will ever added anything to the discussion on This Week? The problem I have with Mr. Will is that his responses are entirely predictable and always drawn from the Heritage Foundation book of talking points.
Lets talk about the compitition for the Olympics for a minute. Chicago is a place with a beautiful lakefront, but nothing to compare to the beaches of Rio. America put put forward the popularity of Barack Obama. Brazil put forward the popularity of their president, known internationally simply as “Lula”.
Brazil rightly pointed out that summer Olympics have never gone to South America. Plus, the Olympic committee was well aware of how the restrictive visa policies of the U.S. would make it difficult for visitors to the games. The later was in fact probably the deciding factor.
Obama did what was expected of the American president and took a day to make the pitch for having the games in America. The theories I heard from your panel today were drival.
Posted by: John | October 4, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I see the Queen is not amused. It would have come across much more humorous if she would have said “Off with his head!”.
Posted by: CybScryb | October 4, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
LM,
That is really, really sad of you even to think that. You’re blaming the 13-year-old girl whose expectation was that she was getting photographed by a major director for a national magazine?
Even if she did want it (she cannot consent — a concept you seemingly cannot comprehend), Polanski would certainly deserve more than the 43 days he served. His acting like he’s the victim is truly disgusting.
Since you think this is okay, please tell us when you believe child rape or even unforced (again, there is no consent) pedophilia should be okay?
Posted by: TheEngineer | October 4, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
I’m glad to read that I’m not alone. George, please stop inviting Katrina Vanden Heuvel to appear on the show. I’m a liberal, I cringe every time she opens her mouth and she adds nothing of substance to the conversation.
Posted by: SMO | October 4, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
What everyone is missing is what the victim herself is saying – that matters most as she feels it should be over now because she is constantly being victimized by the DA in Los Angeles by constantly reading and re-reading the court transcript of what happened to the press. She said she is over it and wants it over for her family. She has forgiven him and her mother. This tells me the DA should just drop it and let him remain a fugitive. In these economic times why are we costing taxpayers millions of dollars to extradite and then prosecute (yet again). Polanski never wanted to return to the U.S. so just let him live and die in Europe and let this poor woman alone to live her life happily with her family in Hawaii. I’m not condoning what happened and yes think it is disgusting, but if we can let Bin Laden off for what he did to thousands of people and not make him pay by truly hunting him down and making him stand trial then quit spending our taxpayer dollars on something even the victim wants dropped. Cokie, who I normally admire, made a very stupid comment today that added no value to the conversation. It was a comment more fitting to Peggy Noonan’s normal annoying drivel.
Posted by: Carolee Crowley | October 4, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Mark’s comments are the kind needed when people on opposite sides of the political fence are discussing a controversial issue.
There is no need for the kind of bitter, profane, name-calling idiocy we see far too much of on both sides.
Issues like Afghanistan and health care reform are extremely tough. They need to be discussed intelligently, based on as many facts as possible.
Posted by: Wayne Corey | October 4, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
LM–
Seriously, you’re questioning why a 13-year old girl made an iffy decision? Because she’s a thirteen year old girl who has been taught that adults are trustworthy people! She wasn’t an ADULT, not that you could blame an adult woman in that situation either–it’s a disgusting attempt to deflect blame that you have engaged in. I heard the same tripe from Mike Tyson’s lawyers–”well, she shouldn’t have come up with him”. Fine. But he shouldn’t have raped her. One of those things is a bad decision. The other is a felony. Guess which one.
Yes, her parents also made a bad decision–I made a bad decision earlier to have pizza instead of soup for lunch. It doesn’t mean that this decision should have led to this young woman’s complete & utter violation. Roman Polanski is nothing but a child molester–he’s admitted a liking to “very young girls” in the past, going so far as to “date” Nastasha Kijinssky (I’m sure I spelled that wrong) at age 15. If he hadn’t made flippin’ “Chinatown,” he would be another scummy old man rotting away in prison…
Posted by: juls | October 4, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Carolee Crowley- The person victimizing this woman is not the DA its Roman Polanski.
Polanski’s refusal to face up to the charges and subsequent decision to flee the country, is the reason she’s still having to hear the accounts.
It’s disgusting to think we are expected to let Polanski go simply because time has passed. He raped a child, he should be punished.
Posted by: Kavan | October 4, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Way to state your opinion Ms. Roberts, my sentiments exactly!
Posted by: david | October 4, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
It’s been clear for some time that Roberts is an elitist who doesn’t believe in the American system of justice. Interesting that for her the Hollywood artiste should be subject to vigilantism while her pals, the cheney-led thugs who okay-ed torture, shouldn’t even be compelled take a break from the Washington cocktail/dinner-party circuit. To apply a quote a famous felon, Leona Helmsly, the law is for the little people.
Posted by: Tristan | October 4, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
PLEASE say you’re joking! In this day and age do we still blame the victims … Even the THIRTEEN year old ones … For the crime of rape? Shame on you!
What’s even more disgusting and disturbing to me is that media LIBERALS, who are supposed to be championing the causes of women, children, and victims of injustice are rushing to Polanski’s defense! Shame on you!
And then there are those who think the victim’s forgiveness means we shouldn’t prosecute the crime! Even Republicans know that the rule of law is not only for the benefit of the victims but for the benefit of society. Shame on you!
Posted by: Karen | October 4, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Carolee, it’s the State of California vs. Polanski. Judges and juries hand out sentences, not victims. Rape is a heinous crime against the entire community. Polanski admitted he committed child rape,then fled, which is another crime for which he should be tried.
Posted by: Tristan | October 4, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I’ve worked with thirteen year old girls who would come on to any man and have more sexual experience than most grown women. I’m not saying what he did was right but thinking these young girls are so innocent is not facing the facts. Obviously her mother was thrilled with the attention she was getting from someone who might be able to start a career for her. Her mother is culpable too.
Posted by: Jean | October 4, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
It is not consentual if she was drugged and drunk!!!!but lets not shoot him, I mean I don’t even care if he does any more than 5 days in the prison showers with the general population oh with no soap on a rope
Posted by: debbie | October 4, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
I don’t watch This Week; it’s hard enough to read the transcript without having also to deal with the fatuous condescension of the commentators — even those with whom I agree. And this week’s version is more obnoxious than usual. Why ANYONE listens to these ill-informed idiots is beyond me. I seriously doubt than any of them has a clue as to what’s going on outside of Washington DC, and I don’t care where they actually live. Apparently, no opinion within the borders of the US matters if it is also outside the borders of the nation’s capitol and/or conflicts with theirs. I think the capper was Cokie Roberts’ suggesting Roman Polanski should be killed — which is about her normal level of surface babble. Never mind the details of the case, Cokie, since they might not jibe with your childish understanding of it; it’s just “Off with his head.”
Posted by: Kyle Michel Sullivan | October 4, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
SMO,
The victim had to forgive him to move on with her life. Aside from the trauma, his buddies in the media (especially the European media) blamed her for the incident. Who wouldn’t want to get away from that. However, the fault here isn’t hers. It’s Polanski’s…for fleeing justice in the first place. Should he be rewarded for extending her trauma?
Are you proposing that we let every pedophile off if their victims wish to move on with their lives? In addition, Polanski was already convicted. Should we let felons know that if they avoid incarceration long enough, they’ll get a pass?
Posted by: TheEngineer | October 4, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
What a double standard. He did what he did………drugged her, raped her…a child and here comes the Hollywood crowd to “pity” up for him. I am going to puke. Cokie Roberts has her head on straight…..as for Whoopie, again, I could puke. Not “rape-rape”…why of course not……….he drugged her first…and that is not “rape”. Good old Hollywood, always showing its true colors. If this was a child or racial minority…raped by a right wing conservative…..oh yeh. Picture it.
Posted by: ljsteere | October 4, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Cokie Roberts has crossed a line with her vicious and ridiculous comment about Roman Polanski. She should not be allowed on network TV if she can’t control her anger and is incapable of being reasonable and articulate.
Posted by: jayce | October 4, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“And then there are those who think the victim’s forgiveness means we shouldn’t prosecute the crime!” It’s not that she forgave him, it’s that she said that every time this gets in the press, she and her family have to suffer humiliation and harassment by the media. So basically we are punishing her for reporting the crime. Obviously it was horrible that he did what he did, but why punish the victim more by making a huge media spectacle about it? And if he had any decency, he’d come back and get this over with.
Posted by: mallory | October 4, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Punish Polanski to the max! Are we surprised that other creepy little old men like Woody Allen support him. They’re equally scummy……
Posted by: Judy | October 4, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
There was failure on all parts in this situation. Polanski’s judgment is the most obvious. Girl’s parents letting her get into that situation in the first place. Justice system reneging on its plea bargain for Polanski. And although I don’t agree with Cokie’s tongue in cheek assessment, I do agree that justifying the rape of a child deserves punishment under any circumstances. I have nothing but sympathy for Polanski’s pregnant wife’s murder. But you don’t get a pass for a casting couch call on a thirteen year old under any circumstances.
That having been said, the victim has requested that this be dropped. I think we should take that into consideration along with the broken plea bargain agreement from the late judge.
Posted by: Mr. Universe | October 4, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Why did other countries let Roman Polanski live free and make a lucrative living when he was an admitted child molester? I say anyone who stands up for him should be ashamed of themselves. He is an admitted criminal and should be in jail,I don’t care how many years have passed or his victim has forgiven him,he owes a debt to society that must be paid.
Posted by: Betty McNeil | October 4, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
This is appaling. Who the hell is Cokie Roberts to make such a judgment? She has a voice only because of her Southern gentry roots, and seems pretty well bent as a male bashing feminist. For God’s sake is it that important to make a blood sacrifice of this old man to make a political point? The girl was underage in America, but not in much of the rest of the world. Her mother placed her in a risky situation to make money and she just happened to encounter a man who has just undergone a trauma most of us will never encounter. Does that exonerate him? Certainly not. But neither does it justify a hanging… or a shooting as Cokie would have it. Give her the boot, already! She obviously has an axe to grind.
Posted by: J Robinson | October 4, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Carolee, the victim is only a witness in this case. This was a crime against the laws of California, so it’s the state’s case. Of course the victim, now grown, would like this attention to go away from her and her family. BTW, she did receive $500,000 from Mr. Polanski years ago. And as far as Bin Laden goes, please tell us what you know about the government reducing efforts to find him. I can’t find out anything since the plans are secret.
Posted by: On The Other Hand | October 4, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
No problem with that, take him out and reagy the fireing squad and while were at it line up all these horney school teachers men and women, all the cheating senetors, representives, govenrs and everyone lese who molests a child be it parent, family memember what ever.
Posted by: tealtripod55 | October 4, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
I’ve met Polanski and his wife. I’ve met the Samantha Geimer and her husand.
I believe Polanski is an honest, kind, thoughtful man and, yes, I would trust him with my teenage daughter. I had lunch with Polanski and my two children several years ago.
Polanski is not a pedophile. He is not a threat to society. He is not a sex criminal. He made a dumb, stupid, unforgiveable mistake thirty years ago.
At some point the bloodlust and vengence oriented exaggerations have to be tempered by an attempt to understand the times…. and Polanski.
He did not imprison his victim for decades in a tent behind his house and impregnate her. He did not rape her daily with her ankle chained to a tree. He did not seek out other victims. He is not a serial rapist. He did not use the revered mask of the voice of God to slowly maneuver his victim into bed over a period of months.
Please balance the specific facts of this case with real life. This is not an abstract fight against sex slavery, child pornography, and sex offenders in which Polanski is a convenient object of scorn.
Polanski is a good father to his teenage children.
Posted by: Reasonable2 | October 4, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Roberts was right. I can’t believe the outcry from the Hollywood Left and assorted morons that defend this garbage.
Posted by: Bill | October 4, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Do you think the fact he gave her $600,000+ in 1994 affected her forgivness in anyway (that’s $25 in today’s dollars)
Posted by: Dave K | October 4, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Oops $825K
Posted by: Dave K | October 4, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
I agree totally with Cokie Roberts. The arrogance and hypocrisy of the hollywood elite, and friends of Polanski is just another sign of the deteriorating morallity of this country. The only travesty that should have been corrected at the time was allowing a plea bargain for him at all. A thirteen year old was drugged, raped, and then the charges reduced as part of a plea bargain. That was the real crime. The fact that it took 30 years to arrest him is the second crime. He should have been in jail and never given the opportunity to run. Justifying this girls rape as Not Rape is almost as imbecilian.
Posted by: Chuck | October 4, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Jayce,
I imagine you’re just trolling. However, as child rape is still a capital offense in some states, and as execution by firing squad is still in effect in Utah, I see nothing wrong with her statement. Rather, those in the media who are treating that dirtbag as the victim are the ones most of us see as ridiculous.
Posted by: TheEngineer | October 4, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Thanks Cokie!
It is imperative that rapists and other felons know without doubt that fleeing will not benefit them — eventually, they will have to return and face prison. If Polanski gets away with this, there will be more than one victim here.
Last week, a man in upstate New York got 20 years for molesting 3 teen-aged boys. Polanski should be facing 20.
It’s scary to think that peole like Harvey Weinstein have a good deal of power and influence in our society.
Posted by: Lindsay | October 4, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I’m not familiar with the details of the Polanski case, but it is remarkable to see this kind of response from Cokie. She fires away like David Brinkley in his later years. Must feel at this stage of her career she’s earned the right to rip away.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 4, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
the really nasty charges were dropped, even though she testified that she was sodomized as well. He did that to a 13 year old folks. He deserves exactly what the judge was going to give him and probably more.
Posted by: mad dog | October 4, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
What’s to debate ? The guy committed a felony on a 13 year old. Bring him to the U.S. and throw him in the slammer for at least 5 years.
Posted by: ron | October 4, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Put him behind bars with other sex offenders.
If he were in the sandbox territory, he’ll be taken to the square on a Friday and off goes his head.
Posted by: ana rosario | October 4, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
They should shoot him. He raped her in every possible part that can be raped, whilst she said no and was drugged. That is rape.
Oh, and she was 13? Well, god, that’s child rape.
But he did the Pianist. That’s a wonderful movie. Yeah, that’s fine, let him go.
By the by, I’m a libertarian. More conservative fiscally, but tend to side with the liberal perspective on social matters such as gay marriage, stem cell, environment, etc.
Our political opinion should mean nothing. It’s rape. It’s child rape. It’s wrong. She should be punished for saying shoot him? Anyone who is justifying what this man did should never be interviewed on any matter of importance ever again.
Posted by: Eric | October 5, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Roman Polanski should come to America to deal with the case against him. I don’t know the facts–that is up to a judge or jury to decide. But it is clear to me that he should answer the serious charges.
As for Cokie Roberts, she has moved into the Fox “News” world. Bill O’Reilly did not specifically advocate for the murder of George Tiller, but he created a legitimacy for his murder. Cokie Roberts has done the same thing for Roman Polanski. ABC is better than that.
Posted by: smoker1 | October 5, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Can somebody please tell me where exactly she’s is residing, specifically which DA office would be responsible for prosecuting her on charges of “felony charge of inciting injury to persons”.
I’m serious. I want to personally refer this for prosecution.
—
Parenthetically the best place to shoot him would be on Umschlagplatz in Warsaw. One more Jew, who cares, right Cokie? Get her a gun and ship her there with Polanski.
What a piece of human you know what!
Posted by: directore | October 5, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am
LET’S LET THE LAW DECIDE THIS MESS.I FOR ONE, AM GLAD THEY GOT HIM. AND I FOR ONE HOPE HE GETS HIS JUST VERDICT.NOW I FOR ONE AM GOING TO WAIT, NOT GET STRESSED AND ENJOY THE FALL WEATHER WE IN IOWA ARE HAVING.
HAVE A NICE DAY !
Posted by: BETTY | October 5, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Cruella de Vil reporting. “Ah, it’s good to be queen!” (or at least high and mighty Cokie.) Rolling those syllables graciously to her colleagues. Then yelling down at the cowering peasants. When at last the dreaded shudders had closed. And once again the townspeople would try to live happily ever after.
Posted by: Jerry Rosen | October 5, 2009, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Why the new anger from Cokie when this is a very old case? It sounds like Cokie sent viewers a big anger package. Because she was unwilling emotionally to sort out and make better sense of the feelings behind the emotions of what she was saying. She made what sounds like a sarcastic objective statement loaded with subjective anger. She regifted a bunch of complex feelings and said Let them the audience deal with it. But unfortunately it really wasn’t the right gift for her audience. It was simply the only gift she could find. When in reality it sounds like there were several much more valuable gifts she could have given if she would have been willing to first look at her statement and then instead of punishing with it, elaborate on what she felt. It sounds like she felt angry. As if she felt that she wanted to make her anger provoke real feelings with the audience. Why did she personally feel so much new anger for such an old case? Certainly there must be new cases where new anger would make sense.
Posted by: Jerry Rosen | October 5, 2009, 4:33 am 4:33 am
13 years old people. THIRTEEN. He was found GUILTY and CONVICTED. The fled before the sentencing.
There is not defending that and the fact he is successful after is an excuse!?!?
DRUGGING and RAPING A THIRTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL? Its no wonder people have such revulsion for elites and their arrogant ‘different rules apply to us’ attitude.
Hollywood types that would defend this man, as well, show, once again, how morally bankrupt many in that industry can be. And some of them think THEY are morality superior? Those that would defend his actions only show themselves to be the ones that are delusional and morally inferior.
No wonder middle and rural America (among others) thinks the coast elites have questionable values and lack moral direction.
DRUGGING and RAPING A THIRTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL PEOPLE.
Posted by: David from WI | October 5, 2009, 4:45 am 4:45 am
We have something called the rule of law which disallows execution for crimes other than murder and requires a trial by jury for ALL crimes. For Cokie to make a statement like “just take him out and shoot him” is extremely irresponsible. At the least, she should be suspended without pay for a couple of weeks.
Posted by: jan | October 5, 2009, 6:02 am 6:02 am
Cokie, you go, girl! And to those of you who disagree, the penalty for rape was execution for over a century. Because there are false accusers, the penalty may be unduly harsh. In this case however, the sodomite plead guilty but was unhappy to serve a prison term.
Posted by: Crawford | October 5, 2009, 6:19 am 6:19 am
LJSteere – way to go. Nice to reduce it to politics. Look up Roman Polanski’s politics. I bet you’ll be surprised. I’ll wait while you do it.
As for those of you agreeing with Cokie Roberts, perhaps you should move to Saudi Arabia where this sort of thing happens all the time. I’d NEVER condone what Polanski did. However, taking someone out and shooting them is NOT the way things are done in America. Want to shred the constitution?
Posted by: J. Allendale | October 5, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Why are they always the SAME talking heads? DC is full of pundits, why not shuffle the deck a little, instead listening to the same predictable opinions all the time?
Posted by: I.M. Pistov | October 5, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
I think Roman Polanski is ready for a leadership position in ACORN, once he finishes his jail time.
Posted by: Willie12345 | October 5, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Had the person accused been a Roman Catholic priest or bishop, those asking for leniency for Mr. Polanski, would be screaming at the top of their lungs for extradition and a trial.
I guess, as usual, the much touted open-minded sharing of opinion and insight, stop where law and opinion disagree with their opinions.
What he confessed to was criminal, so now it’s time to pay the price he has so handsomely avoided for the past 30 years. The $500,000 forgiveness from the unfortunate victim and her mother have no bearing on the rule of criminal law.
Posted by: John Provinsal | October 5, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
“It wasn’t rape rape” – Whoopi Goldberg
Posted by: Alex | October 5, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
I totally disagree, ljsteere. She was quite reasonable and articulate. Who has to give a crap about a pedophile, a sexual predator? No one.
She’s just expressing what a lot of people watching have expressed. Polanski is a waste of space and should have been in jail decades ago.
Rape is rape. Rape of a child, especially heinous. I don’t care what they do with Polanski as long as he faces justice in our courtrooms and ends up in prison.
His ‘art’ wasn’t worth the crime he committed. And considering his comments a year on the lamb, I’m sure that this child wasn’t his only victim.
He got away with it with money and power. If he was Joe Shmoe, he would have been immediately incarcerated and you wouldn’t be crying over him.
Posted by: JR | October 5, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Cookie Roberts has hid her holier than thou fascism pretty well, until her Polanski comment. But her desire to be judge, jury and executioner shows that she is no better than Hitler or Polanski. I don’t condone Polanski, I just think that fascists are worse.
Posted by: R.J. | October 5, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
I for one would like for the US government to bring Polansky back,but not to be sentenced in California,bring him to Texas for sentencing.
Posted by: marion | October 5, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Cokie was both reasonable and articulate… You just aren’t required to agree with her. Her comment was not ridiculous: vicious, maybe. Possibly appropriate? Probably.
Posted by: Sean Bahner-Guhin | October 5, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Moral relativism is alive and well in the United States; Polanski pleaded guilty and fled justice 32 years ago. Our legal system is not based on Germanic law and the state must punish Polanski for his despictable crimes against a 13 year old girl. Those defending Polanski must not be parents or are just ethically dead.
Posted by: James | October 5, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Polanski pleaded guilty and fled the country. It’s not important if the judge would rescind the plea bargain. He pleaded guilty and fled. We don’t have to bring up the rape charges anymore; just the fled justice charges. The victim would not have to address him fleeing the country and the court could still hand out severe penalties.
Bring him home and crush him. Remember the press, DA and others (at the time) reacted as if the 13 year old was the instigator. It doesn’t matter. The adult knew the law and broke it.
Posted by: Mark G | October 5, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
In this day and age, the child would have been taken away from her parents for being allowed to hang out with an older man unsupervised and this sort of thing happens.
Posted by: Wayne | October 5, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Shootings too good for him! Fry his nasty ass!
Posted by: A flaming liberal | October 5, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Polanski needs to be taken out and hung as a criminal. He pled GUILTY people and then fled the country. He admitted to the rape and druging of this 13 YEAR OLD. The crime was committed when she was 13!!!! The hoolywood so called elete who think they are like gods and want him freed probably did the same thing and want him cleared so when they are caught can get the same treatment.
Posted by: Jim Rod | October 5, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Oh, that Cokie!…
Posted by: Dan K | October 5, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
I am disappointed with Cokie Robert’s comments. The last thing we need in American is vigilantism inspired by the self-righteous. I am not on Polanski’s “side”—I am simply against emotional diatribe and projection (as in, “The Bad is in the Other, Not in I”) when what we need most from Americans is compassion and empathy. We are on a slippery slope here. America can blast its way out of power with all of this projection, or retain it’s ability to empathize and try to understand opposing points of view, such as that of the French.
Posted by: classyferret | October 5, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Liberals are at it again. Trying to blame the victim. This clown was found guilty and admitted it by stating it in detail. Now he needs to serve his time – if he ever gets to court. Get with the program or stay out of the subject matter if you cannot comprehend it. Or do you people just base everything on your “Feelings”?
Posted by: Cinderella | October 5, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
If we allow Whoopie and all her Hollywood idiot friends s to say what they want on TV why shouldn’t Cokie Roberts have a turn. I think she speaks for the general public – Whoopie and Debra Winger certainly don’t.. Of course, if it was an animal that was mistreated, they be all over the TV saying “string up the abuser of animals; they don’t deserve to live!!” A little perspective from Hollywood would be a nice change. This guy is a pedophile, plain and simple. He ran from his punishment and has been living the good life. It’s way past time for his punishment to take place.
Posted by: EJ | October 5, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
It’s a double standard. He’s Hollywood so it’s ok. Her mother was with her, she was 13, her mother drove her there and was in the house when all of this happened. Her mother has been very quiet on this issue. She should be charged for contributing to delinquency of a minor. A 13 year old can’t consent to sex with an adult even with her parents permission.
Posted by: Clt | October 5, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Actually, I thought Cokie Roberts was being quite reasonable and articulate. Roman Polanski has exhibited such a high degree of arrogance and absolutely no remorse for his actions in all of the years that have passed. And surely his attorney at the time of the original plea agreement must have advised him that the judge is under absolutely no obligation to accept a plea agreement if he finds that the agreement does not sufficiently punish the defendant.
Posted by: Reekie | October 5, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
I agree with Cokie
Posted by: Jeckhardt | October 5, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Well, I wonder where Cokie really stands on this issue.LOL.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 5, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
He is a sex offender. He lured, drugged and raped a 13 yr old girl.
He could have spared the victim this further scrutiny had he stayed and taken his punishment.
If she is traumatized again, it’s his fault.
The hollywood community supporting him is sickening.
Whoopie needs to simply shut up.
Posted by: MisElaineous | October 5, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
i agree with cokie. shame on hollywood for supporting this pedophile
Posted by: catman | October 5, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
She is right. Polanski is a sick freak who does not deserve any leniency. Hope he gets extradited and rots in jail. No excuse for what he did.
Posted by: XD | October 5, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Oh, please, ljsteere. Cokie Roberts is the most sensible panelist on This Week. Thank, you Cokie, for your sensitivity to the widespread abuse of girls and women. It is truly shocking to see celebrity women defending a man who raped, drugged, and sodomized a thirteen year old child. For women to be on the same side of this issue as Woody Allen is mind boggling. The fact that Polanski is a successful director is no excuse for judging him with a different standard. If he were simply John Q. Public, how would he be judged? How can women EVER expect to curb the crime of sexual abuse that scars its victims for life if they are going to give a pass to some of these criminal perpetrators depending on their profession? What if this thirteen year old had been you, your daughter, sister, or mother when they were that age?
Posted by: FranSC | October 5, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Oh no, don’t shoot him, Put him in jail with some big con who can discuss this anal rape consent/nonconsent dilemma in a reasonable and articulate manner, and, you know, work it out with him.
Posted by: J'Aime Jackson | October 6, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
J Robinson,
What does this have to do with male bashing? And by the way, feminists are not male bashers. As Sally Kempton said, “I became a feminist as an alternative to becoming a masochist.” Feminism is literally the belief that women should have the exact same rights as men. That’s it. So if you have a problem with that, maybe it’s because you’re insecure with your masculinity. This isn’t about “angry dike feminists.” It’s about the rape of a 13 year old child by a 43 year old man. You try to defend Polanski because of the hardships he endured, but that’s no excuse. A normal person doesn’t go out and rape children because they are “traumatized.” He’s always been a pervert and has even spoken about his penchant for “very young girls.” I don’t care how old he is now. He needs to finally pay for this crime. If he had served his time when he was supposed to this wouldn’t be an issue, but he ran away like the coward that he is. By the way, have you read the little girl’s testimony? (He plead guilty). It’s pretty difficult to read, but I think you’ll gain some new perspective. What if it was your daughter? He needs to be punished not to prove a political point, but to show victims of sexual assault everywhere that they matter and that they deserve justice.
Posted by: Kristen | October 6, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Polanski was a known fugitive for this many years. Why is Cokie so adamant now about him ‘being shot?’ Perhaps, Cokie should have been speaking up about this for the last few decades then.
For what it’s worth, Polanski should be brought back and face his sentencing. He could appeal, that is the American judicial system right he has. But he should be also charged with evading arrest because of fleeing, that should be tacked onto his sentence. The courts hopefully won’t give him a light/no sentence for being a good person, blahblahblah all these years, that would only create more of these fugitives exploiting that type of situation, fleeing before sentencing because they would know if they lived without getting caught for crimes elsewhere then they will go free. That is wrong, Polanski should get a harsher sentence because of what he did in leaving the U.S….
Posted by: Mike in L.A. | October 6, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
SMO: just b/c the victim wants to let it go does not make it okay to let it go. It is a crime against all of us when things like this happen. Plus, you are setting up a dangerous precedent to allow one man to go b/c he is a fugitive and not others.
Posted by: NB | October 6, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
It’s really distressing that in the 21st century, humans’ best problem solving plan is barbaric violence. We’re not Neanderthals. We’re sophisticated thinkers who certainly should have learned by now that when you sow violence, you reap violence, and you’ve solved nothing. I was saddened by Cokie’s remark.
Posted by: Pat Arnold | October 6, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Much better hearing it on video than reading it. Thanks Cokie for saying what most of us feel.
Posted by: matt | October 6, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
You go Cokie! For justice to deserve its name it must be blind. When Americans come to believe that there is two systems, one for talented liberals and one for the rest of the great unwashed masses, it will mark the end of our Republic. …And one of these liberals, I believe a creator of Miramax Studios, had the temerity to say that Hollywood has a better sense of what is right than the rest of the Country. Scum like him need a good dose of reality.
Posted by: James | October 6, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Why not just castrate him, which should be the standard punishment for any and all men sex offenders! This to take place in short order, meaning immediately! I bet my paycheck were that the case, this crime would quickly decrease. I also suggest that it would be a greater deterant than the death penalty, especially so, here in the USA where guys sit in jail while the lawyers milk the system dry! Yes, I am speaking as a male, and please you ladies outhere, start a campaign for that punishment to become law! Besides, how can America with a good conscience, have its military all over the fighting, at the cost of trillions of dollars to liberate people from a live of depravaty while every few seconds a woman is raped in the “good” old USA? Yes, this from and by the Nation under God? America, for God’s sake stop making Christianity look more evil that paganism, please? Yes, generally speaking America is more and more the spectacle of and to the world of a nation almost completely unhinged going down a step hill, ever faster as one hears a civil war going on all over America especially right there in DC! Let me suggest additionally, America will fail all over the world simply becasue its own house is in complete disarray! God Almighty will see to it tht America fails, even though that there is a constant demand of God to bless America. That is not how my God of Scripture operates, right? America, wake up as the hour is way past, yet, still a window of opportunity to turn around and do the right “thing”
Posted by: H. D. Schmidt | October 7, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
Cokie Roberts is right. More criminals should just be shot instead of society having to house, feed, clothe, educate, entertain, coddle them. The Manson crowd, for example is still being coddled by our society. Many killers are living a relatively nice life in our jails.
Posted by: Virginia | October 7, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
One of the most rational quotes I’ve read regarding Polanski’s arrest was from the famous French director & producer Lus Besson, “This is a man who I love a lot and know a little bit,” Mr. Besson said in a radio interview with RTL Soir. “Our daughters are good friends. But there is one justice, and that should be the same for
everyone. I will let justice happen.” He added, , “I don’t have any opinion on this, but I have a
daughter, 13 years old. And if she was violated, nothing would be the same, even 30 years later.”
(Try & argue against that, Woody Allen)
Posted by: tiredgirlie | October 7, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Roman did agree to the crime together with a reduced sentence. The two go together. The judge altered the coarse of events and should assume some blame for the resulting fugative status.
A thirteen year old was not a child 100 years ago. God made them able to rear children. She may not be so innocent. Roman has also contributed much more than Cokie to the art of the world professionally. This is not to commend Roman for his distasteful act.
Posted by: Robert | October 7, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Hooray for Roberts! Polanski’s type of person should not be allowed to continue his raping of underage girls. He is a pedophile.How many did he rape in Europe? I do not want to feed, house, clothe, entertain, or support in any way, a sexual predator of children. The Manson killers are also still being supported by us. They have no redeeming values. They should have been exterminated long ago. Our jails are overcrowded because we believe they can be redeemed. Stupid.
Posted by: Virginia | October 8, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
How many people who are blaming the victim and/or her parents now would do the same if Polanski had not raped a 13-year-old girl but murdered an adult man at the time?
Just wondering…
Posted by: sockswoon | October 8, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
As a recent film school graduate, I find I am forced to go against many of my peers and agree with Cokie that Polanski should be punished for his crimes. I lean more toward putting him in prison for the rest of his life than her suggestion, though.
I don’t give a damn that his victim forgave him, either. That is her choice, but the law is still the law. If Roman Polanski is let off the hook, it will set a dangerous precedent for future criminals who victimize children.
I also have to wonder, what would Hollywood be saying about him if he wasn’t a filmmaker.
Posted by: Blake | October 8, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Way to go Cokie! Decent people agree with you.
Posted by: Kathy in Pa. | October 8, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
In my opinion, Cokie Roberts should issue an apology for her “take him out and shoot him” comment. But the apology shouldn’t be to Roman Polanski. Rather, it should be to the American people for legitimizing hyperbolic, inflammatory rhetoric that appeals to the basest emotions rather than reason and intellect. And since “This Week” is a reflection of ABC News it’s important that the focus be on facts and information, not on fueling a feeding frenzy. Yes, I think Roman Polanski should be extradited to face judgement according to establish U.S. legal principles. And I think the reaction of the French government and media has been repulsive. I think Cokie Roberts and I agree on where we should end up with this. I just hate to see contributors to This Week treading ever closer to the kind of garbage that flows so freely from the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Keith Olberman, Glenn Beck and Rachel Maddow.
Posted by: Kent | October 8, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
I can only imagine what kind of reception the diminutive Mr.Polanski will recieve inside the California penal system. I’m sure he’ll find a suitable roommate or roommates that will be understanding of his rape convicton of a juvenile…. They may also wish to join in on his involuntary therepy sessions…
Posted by: Richard V | October 8, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Polanski pled guilty, he said what he did was wrong, when he found out that the judge didn’t agree with the sentence the DA agreed to he left. He did this because he could not change his plee. He has been trying to work out a deal with the DA for years but they were unwilling unless he came back and went to jail first. It’s the same as working out a deal with a burglar at your front door. If you let him in he promises he’ll only take twenty dollars from you and won’t shoot you. Would you take that that chance?
Posted by: headtech | October 9, 2009, 7:33 am 7:33 am
Polanski should go to jail for what he did. Think about your own daughters or nieces or neighbors that age and he has no excuse. His defenders like Whoopi Goldberg absolutely disgust me.
Posted by: Midtown Mike | October 9, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am
I agree with her completely. Polanski is a criminal and he should be shot, or at least he should spend the rest of his life in jail. Pedophiles and rapists deserve no mercy. I applaud Cokie Roberts for expressing her opinion!
Posted by: James B. | October 10, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Reasonable2 says it is just a “dumb mistake” to drug, rape, and bugger a 7th grade girl and that Polanski is really a good guy…
Tell me Reasonable2, if you’d been druggedand buggered by Polanski would you still think he was such a nice guy? If it were your 13 year old child drugged and poked with Polanski’s appendage in her behind, would you still support him?
Posted by: James B. | October 10, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Cokie made an overstated sidebar comment and “somehow” it is deemed as crucial enough to surface on the ABC web portal! Why does ABC even bring such off the cuff remarks to the attention of the general public when made during the pre-program commentary?
If ABC is desperate to cover timely news events – re-focus on such crucial topics as the economy, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, health care reform, environmental concerns, drug addiction and rampant violence, etc. etc. rather than the constant flow of idiotic ENTERTAINMENT TRIPE over and over and over???
Posted by: Arianna | October 10, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
There is nothing the child could have done or parents failed to have done that makes Polanski’s crime more acceptable/understandabble.
PERIOD
Posted by: Michael S | October 10, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Cokie Roberts did not cross the line, Polanski did!
Posted by: Annie | October 10, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Yeah, like the US has the moral high ground. We need to hold our Hollywood directors to a higher standard than our priests, torturers and murdering politicians.
Posted by: Bill | October 11, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am
It is now six days since this blog was first posted. Have just learned that Polanski is “depressed” in jail, and his attorney is concerned. Well, Whoop de Do…”the mills of the gods grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine”. Maybe he should be “sentenced” to depression for each of the 30 years he has been running away to Opulence and World Adoration!!!
Posted by: virginia | October 11, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
You go, Cokie!!!
Posted by: Scottsdale Bubbe | October 11, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Right on, Cokie!
Posted by: Buster Douglas | October 12, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
I agree with Cokie 100%. I don’t care if it was 30 years ago that Polanski did what he did. There should NEVER be a “statute of limitations” for the stealing of someone’s innocence! It was wrong then, and it’s still wrong now!
Posted by: Sabrina | October 12, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Thanks God! that she is devoted catholic, other wise, she will be decapitating all pedophiliacs including
Catholic priest, with Popes included.
Posted by: Rock4 | October 12, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
As long as there’s Cokie Roberts and the media there’s no need for a legal system or for Alice in Wonderland either.
Posted by: Media Fan | October 13, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am
What Polanski did was horrible. And while it is fun for the talking heads to pontificate and emotionalize about it, what about the thousands of children that are still being abused every day by unrepentant molesters? Should we shoot them all?
I’m personally in favor of it… I just want to know how liberals can demand that everyone give up their guns so we can have Utopia, and then shriek, “Shoot him!” when they get a tiny glimpse of the evil underbelly that is in all walks of society, from the ghettos and trailers to the mansions of the elite.
Posted by: Bea Jones | October 13, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am
It’s hard to comprehend that this is the same Cokie Roberts that used to report for NPR!
No matter how disgusted we may be with Polanski’s actions, an emotional, vigilante-level outburst like that surely doesn’t belong on any show that tries to claim credibility as a forum for intelligent debate. Any right wing conservative would likely be skewered for behaving that way.
I wound up finding this video/column only because when a severe storm report took me to the ABC News web site. I’ll make sure to avoid such a sad excuse for “commentary” in the future.
Posted by: Alex | October 13, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Not to defend the guy, but if i was told that my sentence would be spend 40 days in jail and then probation, and I completed that time only to have the judge then change his agreement due to peer and public pressure, then I might decide that there really isn’t any justice and hit the road too. The state of California made a firm deal, then reneged on it, and they should be willing to honor their agreement no matter who likes it or not
Posted by: Ronzander1 | October 13, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
The victim’s testimony is available online, and she states that she repeatedly told him “No” and begged him to stop and take her home. He disregarded her refusal and took her orally, vaginally and anally. It was 100% non-consensual. It would have been rape even if the victim was 40. Furthermore, there is evidence that he has done this many times with victims even younger than this one. I agree with Cokie, but then I usually do.
Posted by: MIke | October 13, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
This is probably not the right thread, but I agree with the previous posters about Katrina Vanden Heuvel. I tend to vote Democrat, but I can’t stand her self-righteous, prosecutorial style. She’s a left-wing Rush Limbaugh without the sense of humor.
Posted by: MIke | October 13, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
About the plea deal: A plea deal is an agreement with the prosecutor’s office for a sentencing recommendation. Judges are not bound by them. Judges can, and do, overrule them. Furthermore, the transcript of Polanski’s plea is available online, and he is told several times that the judge is not bound by the deal, and asked if he wanted to plead guilty anyway. He said yes.
Posted by: Mike | October 13, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Cokie is right to demonstrate outrage. Roman is a fugitive and admitted rapist, an adult man who used drugs, position and flattery to sodomize a child. Surely, he had his pick of opportunistic legal aged women who would have loved to have used the jacuzzi at Jack’s place. His is a planned act of predatory defilement.
He is not excused by his craft or his associates. I do hope justice is served.
Posted by: Neville | October 15, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
People, get a life! Don’t crucify her for her beliefs.
Posted by: sue | October 15, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I have no emphaty for all the perverts, I think because of this Polanski the Japanese child pornography became more popular in Japan.
Posted by: marilou tortona | October 16, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Thank You Cokie!
Posted by: John Q | October 16, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I live and work in Hollywood. The list of 100 sympathizers is not the general consensus in Hollywood, not even close. Almost everyone wants to see Polanski in jail.
The majority of the 100 Hollywood sympathizers on the list are washed up and not relevant anymore. If they were real men or women of substance they would go on cnn,msnbc or fox to explain their defense of a child rapist.
Posted by: John Q | October 16, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
viscious and ridiculous comment?…since when did calling the drugging, rape and sodomy of a child by a pedophile become a viscious and ridiculous comment…it is the TRUTH…and last i checked we have free speech and i say good for you cokie…you bring the gun and i’ll pull the trigger…sooo glad he can’t work here anymore…his movies were trash anyway
Posted by: sukiyhtaky | October 17, 2009, 5:33 am 5:33 am
Cokie Roberts hasn’t crossed any line and what she said wasn’t vicious. She was spot on. In fact, she was very articulate. I understood her position perfectly and I agree with it. No 13 year old can be held accountable for a situation of this nature. The burden of this crime falls solely on Polanski. This may be justice delayed, but it will be justice served.
Posted by: Paula | October 18, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
John Q., it is heartwarming to know that the majority of people in Hollywood do not agree with the perverted 100 but where are their voices? They should speak up and be counted. I think Joy Behar (who I usually never agree with) has spoken up. Good for you Joy. That took some guts.
Posted by: Paula | October 18, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Yes George, SMO is a liberal and she CRINGES everytime this woman is on your program, so PLEASE STOP! Well, we all know that liberals rule and her orders should be followed! Do you hear me? NEVER do it again!
Can’t wait until this administration is GONE! Send George and his libs along too!
Posted by: Kristen | October 19, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
What message is it sending to the children out there who are 13 right now? That they have no rights? That if they do get raped it’s their fault? He was the adult. End of story. He is responsible for his misconduct. I remember Hollywood trying to pass it off as a kind of “love story” when it happened. That is a sickness that they are trying to spread. As they loosen the ratings of movies, add porn and many sexual deviancies to movies pretending that it is the norm. With no care about the influence it is having on our society as a whole. We have to step up for our lives and the lives of the children who are coming up behind us. What is true and good? What is honor? Commitment to do what is right? Standing up for their values and fighting to keep their freedom instead of giving in to complacency?. Will they know what that means? We have to bring them up with a reason to have hope for their future.
Posted by: JJ | October 20, 2009, 5:18 am 5:18 am
I agree with Cokie. People who abused children should received the death penalty. Period.
Posted by: kgh | October 20, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I think Polanski should do time in the prison shower, so he’ll know how it feels to be overpowered, raped, and sodomized. There are probably many more of his victims who never came forward. There has to be punishment for the crime or this will set a very dangerous precedent.
Posted by: Barbara | October 21, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Do people honestly still watch This Week? Goodness, I stopped watching right after watching George and Charlie (Gibson) sabotage the final debate between Obama and Hiliary.
Remember that debate? Both candidates wanted to discuss the issues but, were prevented because George and Charlie only allowed comments on rifts and barbs highlighted during ABC’s coverage.
Posted by: cctidepools | October 21, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Polanski should be a 30 year old ghost by now.Genius he is not, creep more like it.He makes movies,for money.Rape a kid go to hell.Bring him to trail,and hope he gets 20 years to life.
Posted by: e barrera | October 21, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
What Polanski did is despicable. But–why so much time, money and energy is devoted to it –while –as we write–thousands of babies and children are abused, starved and murdered in their families while the law and children protective services claim to be understaffed and ovewhelmed by number of cases.
CA has no money for anything–but found resources to chase an old man ==76-for ancient crime.
Same about the ballon family. Yes, stupid–but again–their ‘crime’ is talked and talked about–but not the tens truly neglected kids in some slumses.It is all to keep moronic public busy (same for Idol, Dancing of the Stars, reality shows)while the thieves of Wall Street are stealing our money.
Posted by: Janina | October 21, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Can’t disagree with her.
But prison will do.
Posted by: inspector Fu | October 22, 2009, 5:40 am 5:40 am
Child abuse is often linked to animal abuse. In one of his earliest films, Polanski stoned a kitten to death. So if he spends his remaining years in prison, I won’t lose any sleep for him.
Posted by: rhd | October 22, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Why did our goverment decide to try get him now? I wish they could put the whole movie and fashion indusry on trial for child molestation, he’s just a small thorn in a much bigger thorn patch, Cokies’ comment is simplistic. There is a bigger picture we the people will never be allowed to see.
Posted by: lizzie | October 22, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
To those of you that say leave it (him) alone……….
It was not your 13 year old daughter (or neice or friends daughter) that was drugged, raped and sodomized.
If it were, do you truly believe you would be for “leaving him alone” or “letting it go” or just continue to let him live out his life (in high style) in another country?
Do you really believe we believe you would?
Posted by: PMC | October 22, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Hmmm, so Cokie wants death for Polanski, yet when Sister Dianna Ortiz was raped by a death squad in Guatemala, Cokie took the side of the death squad and said the nun must be lying. Real consistency there, Cokie. Your sister must be turning over in her grave. Apparently, Barbara was the only one from the Boggs family with brains and compassion..
As for Polanski, let the legal system decide his fate, as it should have years ago.
Posted by: Jeff | October 23, 2009, 7:28 am 7:28 am
Perhaps Cokie was sniffing something unusual, but we should expect something more even-handed from someone in her position. Perhaps she should be just taken out – to a desk job.
This has nothing to do with Polanski, although, having worked in Hollywood back then, it was certainly an untamed period and 13 year olds who were dressed up to look like 20 year olds were known to be enticing. They still are. Our society wants it both ways: Puritan and oversexed. That ain’t real!
Posted by: anonymot | October 23, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
They should boot Whoopi (“it isn’t ‘rape-rape’”) off The View, and replace her with Cokie Roberts.
Posted by: JimFromTX | October 23, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Why is there still a discussion on this? The man broke the law and made the problem worse by fleeing to Europe
and we are suppose to act like nothing happen? He is a grown man, was a grown man when he chose to break the law and was convicted but decided he did not like the sentence he was going to get, so he chose to flee. Just put his sorry butt in jail and get on with life.
Posted by: Elaine Walker | October 23, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
That cocky is real threat for our society! She must be taken to court. Looked at her -she is calling for banditism, armed banditism!
Our feminists are losing their mind compLetely!
Posted by: Madam Prostakova | October 24, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Cokie Roberts lost me as viewer when she said social security was a tired old issue (the only issue Democrats had in the 2004 campaign.) Has Polanski been charged or convicted of any other offenses? Seems to me the girl was pimped out and charges should have been brought against her parents. I say , if he hasn’t done anything else, leave him alone.
Posted by: cregis | October 24, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Why did she go to Nicholdson’s house?
Uh, BECAUSE SHE WAS A CHILD, and didn’t now better.
Even young women in their 20′s are too naive; can be lured; and will believe whatever men will say to them.
Posted by: Gula | October 24, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I agree with Ms. Roberts.
Posted by: Ken | October 26, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
God will issue justice. Humans try and fail.
Posted by: Lisaloo | October 26, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Wow, very professional Cokie Roberts .. “Just take him outside and shoot him” .. doesn’t take much to be an analyst these days huh…
Posted by: Dan | October 26, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
If Ms Roberts is concerned with older men taking advantage of young girls, she ought to look a little closer to home. She is married to the brother of Mark Roberts, one of the most infamous sexual harassers in Harvard University history. He is a professor at the Public Health school there and has regularly had sex with masters-level students there. The Government school at Harvard well not let him teach there because of his behavior around women students. The Public Health school has lower standards.
Posted by: Daniel | October 26, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
I couldn’t agree with Mark’s comments more. Ms. vanden Huevel is a sarcastic, arrogant person who acts like her word is gospel. She does not belong on THIS WEEK, I think MSNBC with Keither Obermann & Chris Matthews is more her style. All of them are sarcastic know-it-alls.
I can’t stand vanden Huevel and don’t know why she’s invited on, who cares what she says.
Posted by: Barbara T. | October 27, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Right on ljsteere..you’re so correct. The Hollywood crowd are a bunch of degenerates anyway. How can Whoopi (who I like), defend this guy, “it’s not rape-rape?” What is it?
Also, I guess Jayce belongs in Hollywood too. Cokie should be “reasonable & articulate.” Why should she, was Polanski “reasonable” when he raped and drugged a 13 yr old? He admitted he did it, he’s a sicko..he should be shot.
Posted by: Barbara T. | October 27, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Yes, what were her parents doing? She was a child.
Posted by: Christy Ross | October 27, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Typical liberal thinking that maybe the perp is the victim. Disgusting! No one one would dare assume that position had it been their own child.
Posted by: Rick | October 27, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Much rape, even the really violent stuff, goes unreported. The victims don’t want the event to become the one indellible part of their identity – the only thing they’ll ever be known for even among friends and family. I can see it.
Posted by: Denise | October 28, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
“I’m not saying what he did was right but thinking these young girls are so innocent is not facing the facts.”
Jean, are you for real?
We’re not talking about, “these young girls”, but a specific child thirty some years ago.
Who cares what you’re thirteen year olds have done. We’re not talking about your thirteen year olds are we?
Have you read any of these transcripts?
A child begging to go home sounds a little different than the disingenuous picture you paint.
When we’re talking about A, lets stick to the subject. Telling me that B does this or that is convoluted, apologetic and asinine?
Posted by: zepa21 | October 28, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
cokie roberts disgusts me. this UTTERLY entitled WHITE FEMALE has had it easy since birth; all because of a man, her father, who was political royalty. she has lived a life filled with abundance; yet all she seems to do is trash men and continually victimize women. she has ZERO idea as to what real life is about and has gooten what she has because of a man; her father and her mother and her name; not because she ever had to do anything on her own.
that said, while roman polanski may have done a bad thing; his own victim has for decades been through with whatver happened. oh, and by the way, her own MOTHER left her alone there with multiple grown men for a “photo” session. uh huh. now that’s normal.
aside from that, roman polanski’s life had been filled with unimaginable horror from birth, including losing his mother in the holocaust, having his 81/2 month pregnant wife, sharon tate, so gruesomely murdered, that 40 years later, she and those who were also so gruesomely murdered that night are remembered as among the victims of the most gruesome crime in america.
meanwhile, cokie roberts has managed to breeze along in her life, with her requisite minor bout of breast cancer (of course- such a female victim), yet due to her profound sense of entitlement, she, apparently, acting as god, has summarily dictated what should occur with polanski; his own victim’s wishes be damned. you know, cause “women’s victim advocate” and empress roberts deems it so.
she is truly a rotten person, who needs to get off the throne. as kathy griffin so aptly said about oprah winfrey “no, oprah, that’s not a stigmata, it’s a paper cut.
Posted by: francis | October 28, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Ms. Roberts is exactly right as far as what the public sentiment should be. Obviously we cannot go ahead with an execution but she seems to correctly see the disgust that we should all have for this child molester and
“Hollywood” types” that always forgives their own for disgusting acts.
To let him go unpunished would be to reward his flight from justice. Why doess Whoopi always seem to be on the wrong side of common sense and doing the right thing. Thanks Cokie!!
Posted by: Jim | October 29, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
I think Ms. Roberts comments are totally right. I don’t care how old the girl is, how good she looks, he tried to get her drunk, gave her drugs, raped and sodimized her. But yet you judge Ms. Roberts comments about a man who thinks very little of women and his “right” to persue them by any means necessary. Some of you people are sick too.
Posted by: A.W. | October 29, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
I think it is unfortunate when people complain about the tax costs involved with bringing a child sex offender to justice( or any sex/violent offender for that matter )What do we pay taxes for? I think that bringing offenders to justice is a worthy expense, especially when it sets a tone towards future offenses and how they are dealt with. I happen to live in a state where a new ball stadium is being proposed on tax payers dollars( even for people like me who do not utilize the stadium )and it make me angry that so much distracting furor is raised in American media over frivolous crap like sports when people go hungry, women and children are raped and racism and domestic violence go under the ” tax help ” radar. This nation needs to keep it’s prioroties straight. When we protect our most vulnerable members of society whether from others or themselves( as in the teen consent laws), we will have a better world.
Posted by: Leah | October 29, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
I agree 100% with Cokie Roberts comment on Roman Polanski. He is a fugitive from a horrific crime against a child – drugging, raping & sodomizing a 13 yr old girl.
Posted by: Bobbie | October 30, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Ask yourself WHY the media has basically steered clean of any criticism of this weird little man for decades, and tends to support him now, with the exception of Roberts, and then ask yourself why the shooting of a guard at a holocaust museum was blared all over the news for two weeks.
Posted by: Truth | October 30, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Cokie Roberts told it like it is! I’m sick of hearing about these perverts raping children. Time to bring the hammer down!
Posted by: Deborah | October 31, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I read the transcripts of the 13 year old victim. What he did was a despicable crime and he should be punished according to criminal law. Period, end of discussion. Jaycee Duggard had long ago forgiven her rapist…no one suggests that he be forgiven. Is it because he’s just a pedophile and not a FAMOUS pedophile? I agree with Cokie. Save us all a lot of costs and just shoot him. A comment for Jean…Shame on you! The young women you work with, no matter how promiscuous, ARE VICTIMS. Someone violated them and destroyed their innocence. Read the transcript for yourself and tell me you feel no desire for justice.
Posted by: Sharon | November 2, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
This is ridiculous. It’s been over 30 years.The man’s wife had just been savagely murdered. He paid the girl a settlement.Doesn’t the American judicial system have more important uses for the taxpayers dollars.Let him go , slap him on the wrist and be done with the whole sorted misunderstanding!!!
Posted by: jeff | November 3, 2009, 6:18 am 6:18 am
Cookie look at the support the libs dems are giving him also hollywood, Maybe you should change your mind. Or you could fall out of grace.
Posted by: DANIEL | November 3, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Hollywood needs to be shot for supporting this rapist all these years.
Posted by: jimmy37 | November 3, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Maybe all those teachers who had sex with students should be set free. At least those kids consented to the relationship. Some have even married their teachers when they finally got out of jail.
Of course, these teachers never directed any award winning films…let them rot in jail.
Posted by: e-man | November 3, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I am a male of middle age, and I think it is repulsive, for a human being to lure in such an innocent , vulnerable , female, and intoxicate, the poor thing, and perform perverted sexual acts…
He should be fed to the lions..
The animal kingdom does not engage in such heinous practices…
I am a liberal, and whats right is right…
Wrong is wrong, and he committed an egregious crime against a minor, and society….
Put him a the same cell with Madoff, or the sickos from guantanmo bay Security guards, who humiliated the Ahfgans, or Iraqis…..
Posted by: byron | November 3, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Cokie Cokie Cokie;
Such harsh words for such a dignified journalist. We know you are an icon for ABC and NPR, the self acclaimed liberal media champions for sextual alternate lifestyles in America and you say such things. Shame Shame Shame.
Polanski is just the dirty side of the very same lifesyles you have embraced. Now you have to say something that is “bar room” talk, on air to make everyone think better of you. Your not kidding anyone. America is suffering and will continue to pay a haeavy price as you allow and dare I say promote the moral decay with the apathetic acceptance of immoral lifestyles.
Truth is America just heard the ugly side of liberal NPR and ABC. Might as well sign off as Cokie Roberts spokes person for ABC or NPR.
Posted by: tmorey | November 3, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Posted by: SMO | Oct 4, 2009 2:13:17 PM:
“…if we can let Bin Laden off for what he did to thousands of people and not make him pay by truly hunting him down and making him stand trial then quit spending our taxpayer dollars on something even the victim wants dropped.”
No one’s advocating letting Bin Laden off. When we lay hands on him, he’s going to die, with or without a trial. So with that roofie-using little bugger in Switzerland. The press covered for him back then, but now even they have to admit that what he did is something we don’t let people get away with. It doesn’t matter if he paid that girl and her parents off… what he did was something that we don’t want people thinking they can buy themselves off of going to jail for. Cokie Roberts finally slipped and said something sensible. The law of averages dictated it, I guess.
Posted by: loupgarous | November 4, 2009, 2:23 am 2:23 am
I don’t have a problem with what Cokie said except for the form. Those are her beliefs and I believe Mr Polanski is a criminal and coward that needs to be prosecuted to the maximum for his crimes.
Posted by: Kadub | November 4, 2009, 5:04 am 5:04 am
Ms. vanden Huevel’s response to the governors races is all too typical. Just snarky, Liberal pap. C’mon George, the show already oozes Liberalism, is she really needed??!
Posted by: cbinflux | November 4, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
RE: Cokie’s comments
Alec Baldwin would be proud.
Posted by: cbinflux | November 4, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Do you hve a daughter? Actually, Carolee, he did want to come back to the U.S. to be “honored” in the film industry, to receive an Oscar etc. . So, while I do agree that it has to be horrible for the victim to see and hear it publicaly again,–HE COMMITED A VIOLENT PERVERTED and COWARDLY CRIME on a child. And, just because she “says” that she doesn’t want him brought to justice doesn’t mean that she trully feels that way—more likely its just that she does not want herself or her family to be publicly talked and wrote about. You obviously do not understand that a victim of this type of crime truly never “gets over it”. And yes the parents should take some responsibility as well for letting her go there and be by herself with him, but come on…let him go with a pat on the back. I don’t think so. And, as for all the celebrities who “support him and praise him” I am extremely disappointed and disgusted in people who I thought had some type of morals and sense of justice. He has not incurred any type of punishment for his crime. Granted, after what Charles Manson did to his wife, and that fact that he was in a concentration camp–I personally believe that he needs extensive therapy and then sentenced to do comuunity work. But, he has to be held accountable for the crime he committed. And how do we know that he did not do this to someone else–who was so afraid of being in the public eye (and after seeing what happened to the victim in the press, I dont blame them) that they never told of what he did to them. Really, just let him be free??
Posted by: Patty | November 4, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
shoot roberts.
what an idiot.
Posted by: smith | November 4, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Like George Will or not…I think of him as the ultimate conservative….an honest man, intelligent enough to actually understand what is meant by conservatism….though a difficult doctrine there are fewer and fewer people in the United States who understand its implications…instead we have Rush Limbaugh spewing his lungs out telling us that he is a conservative.
I kind of wish George Will’s methods were adopted by conservatives than Rush Limbaugh’s..Will is a real conservative, Limbaugh is a real idiot.
I am not a conservative.
Posted by: TruthSaves | November 4, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Cokie Roberts finally said something most people across the board can agree with. I’m still trying to figure out how Ms. Roberts got the nick name … Cokie.
Posted by: OIFVet@USC | November 4, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Who in the hollywood crown has defended him?.
Posted by: wayne | November 4, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Cokie Roberts should BE FIRED for acting as judge and jury. Why is ABC acting on it????
Posted by: MTGBANKR777 | November 4, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Ms. Roberts..you go girl. tell them like it is. Some people don’t like the truth.
He is a criminal and should be charged as such. What is wrong with some of you people? He raped a child then fled the country. He should serve time.
I can’t believe that some of Hollywood elite are backing him. Let it be their Mother, daughter, sister, friend. They’d change their tune.
Posted by: Amy | November 5, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
He, Roman, shall certainly get his due; regardless of the outcome via the U.S. justice system. God shall see to that.
Posted by: bill | November 5, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
I think Cokie Roberts was absolutely correct. Maybe if we used the “one bullet” theory more often we could simply get the message across, rather than the bland justice we hand out these days.
Posted by: David Corbin | November 6, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
CASTRATE him (no anesthesia) shoot him and THEN Hang Him! And that’s too good for the pervert!
Posted by: chris76108 | November 6, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Cokie Roberts was thinking her statements were in line with the audience. Most have a more critical thinking process and don’t indulge the emotional side of this case. Hopefully, Cokie is never on a jury. She could never take any information without adding her own opinions. Roman Polanski made lots of money starting early in his career. He is arrogant, not very likable as a person, but the most important person is the victim. She still counts! If she doesn’t want a trial then so be it. Well, almost. I would fine him for not paying her years ago 10 times the original amount plus interest and her attorney fees, college for her children, pay all her bills off and if he has anything left donate it to charity and he can get a job like millions in this country have done. That is much better than putting him in prison. We are too eager to imprison a person. That is cruel and mostly excessive to warehouse people. He will be free and he has many friends. Now he can have them take care of him.
Posted by: Marlayne Madison | November 6, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Cokie is being reasonable, If the 13 year old AND her mother were swayed by a very articulate ACTOR, No Wonder! If I had stars in my eyes then heaven help me, there but for the grace…
Look, this man acted like an animal toward this little slip of a girl, she said take me home, he sodomized her. Clearly, Clearly he should go to jail.
I like the guy, I feel sorry for him, he’s lived his life on the outside, that’s what happens when you don’t take your medicine when you are supposed to.
Posted by: Ebarisch | November 7, 2009, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Only if Cokie stands behind when he’s fired upon! Her comment, no matter how one feels about Polanski, is unprofessional and in bad taste. Come to think of it, so is she.
Posted by: La Chatte | November 9, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Shooting him would be too fast let him suffer in prison for life with a “large” cellmate.
Posted by: Howard Grizzle | November 9, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Well if people who molested kids got shot it would sure cut down on repeat offenses.
Posted by: Jersey Dave | November 9, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
To whom it may concern,
That $500,000.00 that was agreed to be paid to the girl Polanski raped as a settlement “still hasn’t been paid”, moreover, not only is Polanski a rapist, he is a deadbeat too. He left the US and fiqured that he would never pay. Well, drag him to the US to take his medicine by the criminal justice system for what he did.
Posted by: SELAWRENCE | November 9, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
When you find yourself being swayed politically by Hollywood types just remember they are the same ones who are the most vocal in support of Polanski and demand his freedom.
Posted by: Gary | November 9, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Let’s hear it for Cokie! My sentiments exactly!
Posted by: kevin | November 9, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
I wonder if the French people would be so supportive of Polanski if he had raped a young French girl instead of an American.
Posted by: Janet | November 9, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
This is a pointless and useless witch hunt. It’s being used to deflect attention from the criminals who should be in prison: Politicians.
Yes, Polanski is a dirtbag, I agree. However, I’m in the bar business, and it’s a fact that Mothers do dress up their 13 y/o daughters to look & act much much older. We get them in the club usually W/mom. Of course I’m in Los Angeles. I can’t blame the daughters, but I can’t have the mother’s arrested either. ONLY the kid gets in trouble. So? My point? Why is it only Polanski? Why is the mother not being charged for reckless endangerment or some other charge. They’ve (mother & daughter)admitted that this was a set up/plan (the seduction, the dressing up, etc) & they got exactly what they wanted, well I guess not exactly. Neither mother or daughter got a career out of it. So, mom pimped her daughter out & as usual, the guy gets the blame. Typical of the puritanical streak that rules the USA.
In the future you might want to look at the legal age of consent in other countries. Heck even in ours in the past this girl would’ve already been married w/kids. We now consider anyone under 18 unable to make sexual decisions. Of course TV tells us something different and kids actions prove it.
Let Polanksi die, it looks like it won’t be long. Quit wasting money, hell, even the woman in question admits it wasn’t his fault entirely.
Perhaps if parents would parent we wouldn’t have this kind of incident. But no matter what, SHOOT HIM? This from a woman that who cheerfully supports torturing each and everyone of us if it allows her to continue her privileged life.
Posted by: CRG | November 10, 2009, 7:12 am 7:12 am
Polanksi would have gotten 45 days if he had just stayed and done the time originally. Now it’s a global flap, and people want to take his life, if not by firing squad, then by imprisonment until death. I find this ludicrous. He should just do his 45 days and be done with it.
Posted by: Julis Keyser | November 11, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I think Cokie is brilliant, especially for her comment on a pedophile, who raped and drugged a 13 year old girl! I don’t care who he claims to be! He’s a criminal, period!
Posted by: Elizabeth | November 11, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Polanski is a movie director, so I’m SURE Cokie Roberts merely meant he should be shot by a camera!
But personally, I think he should be shot by a firing squad, and I suspect there would be plenty of volunteers.
Posted by: Bill Principe | November 12, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
She said “raped” twice in there
Posted by: Shiggity | November 15, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
What Cokie needs here is to exercise wisdom, not kneejerk reactions. Yes, Polanski is disgusting and deserves to be put away. It’s disgusting that people defend him. But to say that we should take someone out and shoot them implies that you don’t care about the law…that’s vigilante justice. It also implies that such criminals can never be rehabilitated, which is not true. The solution doesn’t begin when you shoot someone. It begins when they learn right from wrong, which should be in the home or at the church, synagogue, or mosque, etc…admittedly, not after they’ve committed child abuse. But no one is beyond hope…even Polanksi.
Posted by: Bob | November 15, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
What Cokie needs here is to exercise wisdom, not kneejerk reactions. Yes, Polanski is disgusting and deserves to be put away. It’s disgusting that people defend him. But to say that we should take someone out and shoot them implies that you don’t care about the law…that’s vigilante justice. It also implies that such criminals can never be rehabilitated, which is not true. The solution doesn’t begin when you shoot someone. It begins when they learn right from wrong, which should be in the home or at the church, synagogue, or mosque, etc…admittedly, not after they’ve committed child abuse. But no one is beyond hope…even Polanksi.
Posted by: Bob | November 15, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Rape is rape. Eaven if the guy is a talented Hollywood director.
I wonder if the folks in H’wood would feel differently if Polanski fed their daughters some drugs and raped them?
I guess it would depend on who did the raping and how that might help their careers.
Posted by: father of a daughter | November 16, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
I think CR “articulated” her point perfectly. It’s high time someone on network TV gets overtly worked op over such a travesty as this and call a spade a space. Kudos to her.
Posted by: elooper | November 17, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Ms. Robert frequently makes angry remarks about men. Advocating violence is definitely over the line and is no better than the loose talk of right wing radio hosts. But I think even people like Roberts, probably of minimal intelligence, should be able to say dumb things without reprisals. It is still just speech.
Posted by: Forshorn | November 17, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Blame the 13 year old girl (victim) and her parents not the old pervert….. who drugged and raped a child….. he should be sent to prison forever….
I can not believe people justify this kind of perversion.
Posted by: Kevin | November 17, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
These pundits express moral outrage, rightfully, that a minor would be subject to a sexual attack. Yet, they never express dismay that we put our children at risk of death in wars (US enlistment age is 17), or send our adult troops to areas where they will inevitably kill children who are either forced into combat or casually dismissed as “collateral damage.” Surely the latter types of child abuse deserve at least equal moral outrage.
Posted by: Joe | November 19, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I love how people stand up for Cokie and either don’t know or simply forget that she’s Roman Catholic.
How many priest and bishop pedophiles/rapists does the Roman Catholic church protect?
If Cokie has such a problem with pedophiles/rapists then why does she follow a religon that not only protects them but keep them living in luxury?
Funny that she doesn’t talk about that paticular issue, eh?
Posted by: Averre | November 20, 2009, 2:35 am 2:35 am
Polanski admitted guilt and paid $ to the victim. Yes?
The justice system reneged on it’s deal. Right?
The parent(s) of the child failed to responsibly supervise their teen daughter.
Why isn’t Roberts saying that the justice system and the child’s parents should be taken out and shot?
Because it’s easy for angry feminists to blame everything on the man. It’s their reliable, boring M.O.
She’s playing to the camera and looking for attention/publicity.
Her words are irresponsible but predictable since Hollywood and D.C. are indistinguishable. The Politics Of Publicity.
Posted by: David Gregoire | November 20, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Cokie Roberts’ comments were hers to express freely, and as they don’t rise to the level of someone shouting FIRE in a crowded theater, they seem OK to me. How reasonable people can speak of Mr. Polanski’s actions as anything but the most vile and criminal doesn’t seem OK to me. Anyone ever having a daughter of 13 would certainly also be acting negligently, if not criminally, if they left her in the private company of Mr. Polanski since this rape. See yourself as the parent of such a victim. Would you then be likely to say it wasn’t a crime?
Posted by: paul callanan | November 20, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
I’m pretty sure Cokie Robrts has had second thoughts about being so frank in stating what many other people would agree with.
Polanski should be shut up in a very dark place for a very,very long time
Posted by: phritz | November 21, 2009, 1:51 am 1:51 am
Mr. Will is the only one who understands the concept of “innocent until proven guilty”. It’s no surprise that Cokie Roberts would summarily dispense with our system of justice (unless or until she was charged with a crime). “This Week” has become a waste of time ever since David Brinkley left. Young Mr. Stephanopoulos should never have been allowed on the show, let alone as moderator. He never did learn any manners, and interrupts anyone and everyone who tries to talk about anything other than what might happen in the future. Only Mr. Will usually has anything interesting to say, and he always does so with taste and civility. Any day now, the show will revert to “who will be the next president?”, and I’ll stop watching again.
Posted by: Bruce | November 21, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Amen, Cokie! I was beginning to think I was the only person in the world who saw this disgusting rapist pedophile for what he is! It sickens me to hear the Hollywood elite do nothing but make excuses for this rapist. We give this guy awards? We praise his artistic “genius”? I guess because he’s a filmmaker, and North American’s are so star-struck and celebrity obsessed, his criminal behavior can be excused. And is it any wonder so many ridicule France? They harbor this loser and act as a place of refuge for all manner of human garbage.
Posted by: Jeff | November 22, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Thank goodness someone can actually speak the truth about Polanski and state how they feel!
The difference between Coki Roberts who speaks of her justifiable distane for the dispicable acts of Polanski and someone like Kristina Van Den Huevel is that Coki expresses her feelings as just that. Van Den Huevel assumes her feelings are enforceable as the law based on nothing other than her feelings.
One is civilized and the other is not.
Lets have more Cokie Roberts in the world and less of the hot air from Katrina!
Posted by: John Q. Public | November 25, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am
pervert polanski still hasn’t slithered out from under the rock that he is hiding under in europe. today is 25 nov 2009. VINCE above gets my vote with: “Give him a “radical bobbittization”….then….”
why don’t they have a jury of the VICTIM’s peers to decide what happens to childabusers? the VICTIM’s peers KNOW things, and are not the stupid nut jobs who whine around on behalf of the vicious perpetrators because he looks nice in his suit today.
Posted by: Cokie IS Right! | November 25, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
She said rape twice….
Posted by: VoteRonPaul | November 27, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
This does bring up the point of trying children as adults for crimes. I agree that minors cannot be considered as giving consent for sex with adults. How is it then that we try young children “as adults” for some crimes? It’s a disgrace.
Posted by: Savechildren | November 27, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Polanski did the crime then he should do the time. This is a direct insult to our criminal justice system when Polanski fled and basically laughed in our faces. Always making sure he avoided extradition in his travels, except this time. Polanski needs to serve his time for the initial crime of rape and then be charged with fleeing the country to avoid his sentence.
Posted by: Craig | November 27, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
I believe Cokie Roberts got it right, Roman Polanski is a sexual deviant, a rapist, and a pervert who deserves to be jusged in the United States for his crimes. As soon as he is extradited to the United States, justice will be served when he is properly sentenced.
Posted by: D. Moore | December 1, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Cokie Roberts doesn’t work on ‘network TV’, she works on NPR, an organization not driven by the need to profit from cheap sensationalism. Child molesters should be locked up, and the key to their cells should be thrown away. I’m as liberal as they come – I’ve voted for the most liberal Democrat in every election in my life. Roman Polanski is ‘Eurotrash.’ Lock him up and forget him.
Posted by: BenFranklin | December 2, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Mark, If TW stops having Katrina vanden Heuvel on the panel, I for one (but I’m sure there are many) will stop watching TW.
Posted by: Jaycee | December 2, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am
The girl was 13 and her mother is an idiot. Who lets a 13 year old girl go to a party like that? Polanski did 45 days in a mental ward and the deal was with the judge ( now deceased) that he would face NO jail time other than the 45 days he did in the mental ward. The judge was beginning to change his mind, Polanski found out and fled the country. So what do we do with a 76 year old man who’s victim wants this all to go away. He should serve time according to the laws back in the day when the crime occured. He probably will not return to the US voluntarily and France does not extradite their citizens for any reason. I expect he will settle with the US for house arrest in France or possibly some time in a French prision.
Posted by: Jamie | December 2, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
And, Jayce, what “line” would that be, and who writes it, exactly? Did I miss part of the first amendment that establishes this “line” you speak of as an abridgment? She’s speaking in something called “hyperbole” — and I’m sure you’ll excuse the lady for being angry when she hears a little girl was drugged, threatened, and raped by a pervert ignoring her cries of, “Stop! Stop! Stop!” Go and read the transcripts of this little girl’s testimony. Maybe you’ll have some understanding of it — or maybe you’ll wish you were in Polanski’s shoes.
Posted by: Millard | December 2, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
All you vindictive people area as bad as Polanski. His crime was not against “society”. It was against a particular girl who does not want him prosecuted. Even if she was not capable of informed consent way back then, she is capable now. Should we spend millions to prosecute a case that the victim does not want prosecuted, just to make a name for a hot-shot prosecutor and satisfy the sadistic temperament of Cokie Roberts. The victim says NO – so but out you self-righteous Hippocrates.
Posted by: Bob | December 2, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Amen Cokie!
Posted by: Right Wing Extremist | December 4, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
True words. They SHOULD take him out and shoot him. Or better yet make him think he can run away as they’re putting his on the plane to the U.S and shoot him then.
Posted by: steph | December 4, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Easy cokie
You may not be invited to many celebrity parties with that tone!!
Posted by: Steve | December 5, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Jayce….
Kudos to Cokie for saying what all other network news “folk” are too afaid to!! Of course she’s angry! This rapist has been “free” or “on the run” for YEARS! I say turn the rapist over to his victims’ father and family… let them “Have at him.” !
Posted by: Kim | December 5, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I remember some of her interviews a few years back. She seemed like a half-wit back then and I guess that first impression holds true from what we see here.
Apparently her elitist parents, a Congressman and an Ambassador/Congresswoman, got her her the gig on the news. She is the typical elitist media hack that loves to hear herself talk – babbling about something and thinking she is making sense. Whatever, they all give themselves awards and such and we’re supposed to be impressed. Well, we’re not.
Posted by: Mark | December 6, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
And Cokie Roberts is a ‘reporter?’ If she did any true investigating she would know that her statements regarding Polanski are closer to the exaggerated hype and distortion surrounding this case. Do your homework Cokie.
Posted by: bgdk | December 7, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
I am with Cokie on this one. If he raped my child in this fashion I would shoot him myself. He knew what he was doing and he thought he was above the law. (Not unlike some of our celebrity athletes and politicians.) This man is a fugitive from justice. He is the type of man often profiled on Americas Most Wanted. Has anyone wondered if he stopped this perversion while on the lamb in Europe for the last 30 years? Chances are that he continued his life style, perhaps paying for sex with children in this lucrative global industry. If so, what happens to these kids to keep the story quiet? The only reason Polanski is defended is he is accomplished in other areas of his life. But you dont get off the hook because you made some good movies and lots of people liked the movies. It says something dark about us that we did not boycott his work, or that we allowed him to continue his work.
Posted by: Steven W. Vande Lune | December 8, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Right On! Bout time someone told what should happen to those that attack kids. He could still be doing it you know, face it.
Posted by: Beezo | December 9, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Right On! It’s time someone in the media said what should happen to these people that hurts kids.
Posted by: Beezo | December 9, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
MISS C. ROBERTS IS ENTITLED TO HER OPINION AND I RESPECT HER WORK BUT I THINK IT WAS IRRRESPONSIBLE TO AIR IT!!! THOUGH I KNOW MR. POLANSKY IS A “MONSTER”, EVERYBODY NEEDS TO BE TRIED AND CONVICTED!!! THAT’S WHAT A RESPONSIBLE JOURNALIST SHOULD SAY!!!! m. a. mcnamee – old town alexandria, va.
Posted by: minedga a. mcnamee | December 10, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Polanski deserves the same treatment on his broken ass. Bubba is waiting at San Quentin and there won’t be any discussion about ‘art’ as in cinema.
There may be a brief discussion about quality control of petroleum jelly based products. Polanski will eventually become a spokesperson for Jonhson & Johnson.
Posted by: riz451 | December 10, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Cokie Roberts is terrific. Always on point, doesn’t mince words and never gets carried away with emotion over thought. One of the great journalists of our time and she alaways sounds so dignified.
Posted by: steve e. | December 10, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Jayce – Cokie Roberts crossed a line? The problem with the US is people like you. We should give child molestors ZERO warning. If you violate one time, you should be killed. Anything less is ACCEPTING AND PROMOTING child molestation. You would rather we let these people go, and rehabilitate them? I swear if I heard you say this in public I would take off my belt and beat u in the face til you couldnt talk no more. He admitted his guilt, skipped sentencing, and now u want to give him another shot? I will give him 3 shot right to the cranium. SHOOT ROMAN POLANKSKI NO APOLOGY.
Posted by: Phil | December 11, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
I find it amusing that all of these people are suggesting that the victim of R.P. was uninformed about what she was expected to do.
A famous quote from Marilyn M. after the movie (some like it hot) was a success can’t be entered here because of it’s raw sexual content.
All who that are screaming for R.P.’s head ignore her mothers part in this tragedy
Posted by: George Mcpheron | December 11, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
EVERY PEDOPHILE SHOULD BE SHOT! There is NO excuse for abusing children in any way, shape or form, regardless if it is sexual, physical, emotional, etc. in nature. Perpetrators & parents alike MUST be held accountable for their actions or lack thereof! Children are innocent and need to be protected by society as a whole and not just in THIS country, but world-wide. We should just let Polanski stay in Europe?? I wonder how many victims he has there? He is a SICK individual and so is ANYONE who comes to his defense.
Posted by: BAB | December 11, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
What did Cokie think of the Mary Kay LaTourneau matter?
Posted by: Truth2Power | December 12, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Were you self righteous folks to actually read the transcripts as I have. You would realize that the victim had already engaged in sex as well as recreational Quaalude us in times prior.
While intercourse with a child is wrong, of course. Angelica Houston who came to the door that night said that she neither looked 13 nor did she look scared but rather “sullen”.
The way the victim’s mother found out was the older sister overheard the 13 year old retelling this to her boyfriend over the phone. The same boyfriend she had been having sex with for over a year.
Again, not saying what happened was right but at some point one must look at the facts. Roman Polanski served the court ordered term. He only fled when the judge stated that he was now going to tack on more time and then deport him.
It was a misconduct, period. The issue of ‘double jeopardy’ comes in to play. He has already been tried, convicted and served the *original* prescribed term.
Posted by: Dan Wade | December 13, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am
I’m w/ Cokie on this 1
Posted by: jeff | December 13, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Cokie is of course correct.
Posted by: Dick Handlet | December 18, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
What could be more reasonable and articulate than suggesting we take him out and shoot him?
Are you proposing that we house him for a period of time on our own dime and then turn him loose on the general public again?
Option two seems to be the solution that is vicious and ridiculous. The fact that you believe a person like Roman Polanski could be “rehabilitated”
makes me believe you have lost touch with reality.
Posted by: Scott | December 18, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
This “child” had done the same drugs before, and had sex before with an ongoing boyfriend when she went to the photo shoot with Polanski. He was then subjected to a mistrial that makes the Amanda Knox trial look like a judgment of Solomon. Some of you should stop hating foreigners long enough to look at the facts in some of these cases. Some people, including Cokie Roberts, should read up on what actually happened before shooting their mouths off.
Posted by: Legal Eagle | December 18, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
“Polanski admitted he committed child rape,then fled, which is another crime for which he should be tried.” Polanski admitted sex with a minor. He did not admit more serious charges. He was told he’d be offered a plea bargain. The judge went back on his promise. The judge mishandled this trial so spectacularly that defense and prosecution BOTH filed a motion to have him taken off the case.
Posted by: Legal Eagle | December 18, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
My fifteen year old niece has been having sex with her boyfriend for months. We might not like it, but it really is not uncommon. Some of you need to get out more. And why was this kid’s boyfriend, with whom she had already had sex, never accused of rape? Could it be there wasn’t enough publicity in it for the judge?
Posted by: Marcus Km | December 18, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
That was scary comment to make, even if it was a real crime that was committed, a news anchor such as Cokie, should try to use better words to describe her anger at the justice system. I agree that anyone who commits a really bad crime should have something unpleasent happen to them by actually being shot reminds me of someone standing in front of a firing squad and getting shot to death, that image isn’t a good one.
Posted by: Stephanie | December 19, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Well said, Cokie. Well said.
Posted by: jggrimm | December 20, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
He should come back here and take his punishment, with interest. A percentage for each year that he was a fugitive should be added. As he is already an old man, he couldn’t serve enough time before his death, so perhaps we should throw in a little torture. Cokie’s “shoot him” is much more humane that what I would have in mind for him.
Posted by: Lou Curry | December 20, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
She did cross the line, words spoken from public person should be chosen more carefully.
Posted by: MDM | December 22, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
She must think she is the judge or something. Complete irresponsibility;
someone instigating vigilantism on public media. Regardless of his conviction and sentence. Someone taking him out and shooting him would be murder and not justice. That is something the courts need to decide, not some smug news reporter. It would be something else if she said she believed the judge should sentence him to death. But this is over the line. She should be fired. Cookie Roberts, you just need to resign before it is too late. What is it time for the mad lynch mobs to start taking control?
Posted by: what | December 22, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
I always did like Cokie Roberts! Now, I remember why. She got it 100% correct. Take him out and shoot him!
Posted by: sarah | December 23, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Cokie Roberts, by advocating homocide/cold blooded murder, you are no better than Polanski himself. In fact, you are worst.
Posted by: Kate | December 23, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Hey, do what she said…
Posted by: DonaldTrump | December 23, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Maybe some should shoot her for; A. Not being a neutral reporter, I personally don’t care about HER opinion. B. That horrendous 1970′s haircut, modernize already!
Posted by: CarpeDM | December 24, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
I am very surprise that Ms. Cokie Robert will make such comment. I think, she was having a bad day for some reason.
I think Ms Roberts is Catholic, do Catholics shoot people who have committed sex crimes? By that logic, what should happen to all those Catholic priests who have committed sexual offenses. I do not think even George Will will make such sorry comment.
Posted by: Isaac Essel | December 25, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Roman Polanski is a criminal. He should be extradited back to the U.S. and stand trial for child molestation. And, for those in Hollywood who are supporting him because he is a friend and a “brilliant director”, I say “Shame on You”!
Posted by: Janet | December 29, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Even if this child wasn’t 13 but an older woman of 20, 30 or 40- that creep Polanski still drugged her and then raped her. RAPED HER WHILE DRUGGED! That is against the law! However, she was 13 and unable to legally consent to the sex even if she hadn’t been drugged and given alcohol. He fled the country and that is against the law, too. A Nation of law cannot allow such behavior to go unpinished… Period.
Posted by: Michael | December 29, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Give us all a break- why has someone tried to make this issue into the tired “liberal vs. conservative” finger pointing b.s.? Roman Polanski is a DISGUSTING CHILD MOLESTING PIG who committed a crime and needs to be prosecuted. If someone is too stupid to agree, then they’re not a liberal, they’re just stupid.
Posted by: Redwoman | December 29, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Strange how Cokie wants a summary execution for Polanski — don’t you think her beloved ACLU would have a problem with that? — but was critical of the Bush administration’s kid-glove treatment of Guantanamo detainees.
ABC is reporting that
• Al Qaeda in Yemen radicalized the young man who attempted to murder the 300 people on Flight 253, and provided his bomb
• Two of the four top leaders of al Qaeda in Yemen were detained at Guantanamo until November, 2007 when they were turned over to Saudi Arabia and then set free after supposedly being rehabilitated.
• Now U.S. officials say these men have shown they pose a much greater operational threat than al Qaeda in Pakistan or Afghanistan.
Clearly, Bush’s policy on releasing Guantanamo detainees was too lenient.
Posted by: Jessica Tufts | December 30, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am
he’s already been found guilty of this crime. why hasn’t the sentencing phase started?
Posted by: ant | December 31, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
drop the whole thing because the victim says so? i don’t think so. if that were the case, then domestic abusers everywhere would get off without punishment when the wife/gf forgives him. ridiculous.
Posted by: birdy | December 31, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I think all who SIN should be taken out and Shot in the Foot..with a Sling Shot…what about all the Babys that have been killed by their own Mother’s!…Where the Justice For Them..
Posted by: debra | January 2, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am
In a just world for what he did, and the 8th amendment notwithstanding, Polanski would be whipped till unconscious. Through malice aforethought, he defiled and victimized a young girl for his own personal amusement and pleasure. A decent society cannot abide such horrific abuse. While I will be pilloried for the above, in essence a variant of Hamurabi’s Code (an eye for an eye), if enforced, would drastically reduce crime overnight. We should start with Roman — aptly named for both the crime and punishment.
Posted by: Wings_of_Man | January 3, 2010, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Jean, let me see if i have this straght. because you have worked with 13 year old girls and some of them have flirted with men, this 13 year old girl deserved to be drugged and sodomized by a grown man. You and all those apologists for this vile rapist Polanski are disgusting. BTW, would it be o.k. if polanski sodomized your 13 year old daughter? How about you Carolee, can someone rape and drug your little girl or is just o.k. for someone elses child to be violated?
Posted by: Leo Snyder | January 5, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
This lady is just a JERK! Everything that Romie did is AOK with me. He should not be shot. Unless it’s for one of my favorite mags. If it is, Then Shoot away!
Posted by: Kevin Jennings | January 6, 2010, 2:04 am 2:04 am
You will not shoot this man! He can hide in my closet….I mean cabinet….I mean duffle bag…..Oh, Crap!
Posted by: Kevin Jennings | January 6, 2010, 2:08 am 2:08 am
If Charlie Manson had escaped to Europe after the butchering of Polanski’s wife, Sharon Tate, he might well have gone on to marry and become an upright member of his community. Would Polanski and his Hollywood friends be arguing that it all happened 40 years ago and we should all just move on? After all, what good would be served by dragging poor Charlie back to LA after all those years….
Posted by: Bubba1984 | January 7, 2010, 1:24 am 1:24 am
I couldn’t agree more with Cokie on this. Polanski is a piece of garbage pedophile! Regardles of whether or not this young 13 year old girl went to his house of her own free will or not, and regardless of whether she posed for for explicit photos or not….it is ILLEGAL to give drugs to minors and it is ILLEGAL to have sex (consentual or not) with minors!! Anyone who sympathizes with Polanski is a digusting individual. I’d be happy to loan Cokie my gun and even spring for the bullets!!
Posted by: Jeagan | January 7, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Jayce has it right (left?) – how on earth can a legitimate human be outraged by what Roman Polanski did to this 13 year old girl. We have to look for the nuances that makes this behavior “reasonable”, like the 9/11 attacks. If you look hard enough with the proper glasses on you can see that the perpetrator is really the victim and black is white, etc. Shame on you “little people”!~!
Posted by: Honest John | January 7, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
By now, one and all should know that IF “the deed” is done by someone in the leftist liberal camp, the ‘the crime’ a mere ‘blip’. Thus people such as ‘Che’ and ‘Mao’, who were demonstrably brutal murderers, should be seen as ‘enlightened’. Come on folks, get with the agenda here!!!
Posted by: Honest John | January 7, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
It is OBVIOUSLY the girl’s fault – Roman is after all a leftist liberal icon. It wasn’t “rape rape”, that only happens when the sicko is NOT a leftist liberal. You know, like Che, Castro, Mao etc are not “murderer murderers” – their intentions were noble. And hey, the “jihadists”, they hate Bush, so whatever they do can’t be toooo bad. I think Cokie just had a delusional moment of sanity and decency – damn her!
Posted by: Honest John | January 7, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
RAPE IS A CRIMINAL ACT PUNISHABLE BY LAW. SO POLANSKI IS A CRIMINAL AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED. PUT HIM IN JAIL AND REST ASSURE HE WOULD BE MAIMED BEYOND
REHABILITATION, BY FELLOW INMATES WHO HATE RAPISTS….ESP. TO A 13-YR-OLD
CHILD. HAVE SEEN SEVERAL….WORKED IN A REHAB HOSP.
Posted by: RACHEL R. | January 8, 2010, 4:57 am 4:57 am
jayce, Roberts should be angry, we should ALL be angry that a pedophile has been living free for so many years in France. If I ever go abroad, I will NOT visit France! Goldberg’s films are off my list. How dare she? How dare you? Yeah, I’m pi**ed that having wealth gives felons a free pass. Polanski needs to face the court in CA, have an added charge because he fled, serve his time and if he is still alive, register as a sex offender.
Posted by: Bob | January 10, 2010, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Polanski is a pathetic pedophile sex offender. Anyone that supports this filth is just like him because they condone his behavior. His movies weren’t THAT great, and even if they were it does not excuse his behavior. Like all pedophiles, he is trying to blame the victim.
Posted by: Bob | January 10, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
I agree totally. It is about time that someone speaks candidly about the injustice in this country.
Posted by: Scott Harrison | January 12, 2010, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Whoopi Goldberg does not embody an advanced understanding of children or any great desire to raise them properly. Whoopi’s daughter Alexandria had a child when she was 14; so in spite of her success, Whoopi was far from a model mother. Maybe by blaming the victim in the Polanski rape case Whoopi is absolving herself by proxy for not protecting her own daughter from a sexual predator. Just a thought.
Posted by: aog | January 12, 2010, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Cokie Roberts did not crossed the line she is 100% right vicious no and ridiculous no she knows how to control herself she does not have any anger she is all but reasonable and articulate.
Posted by: Rufina Main | January 12, 2010, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
After reading these comments…most I only read a few words.
I’m convinced we should keep all children indoors until 18, punish all parents of teens up front for having kids, bomb France immediately, castrate all men that think or do anything sexual, end network fake news, and not allow anyone in TV to have personal opinions about anything…the recent new phrase “Duh” stands out as a simple explanation to all this attention to something so meaningless…(Cokies comment). Who cares what any of us think and what she thinks either for that matter…I love this stuff.
Posted by: Bud | January 14, 2010, 12:42 am 12:42 am
One thing extra…related to what the “Victim” said.
“The best revenge is to forgive your enemies…it screws with their head”
Americans always want revenge for the “victims” but ignore the ones that don’t want that…we have no business deciding what should be done about this. It is a matter for her to decide.
Posted by: Bud | January 14, 2010, 12:51 am 12:51 am
I am a survivor of sexual abuse and I say GO COKEY! If a few of these characters were taken out and shot on the courthouse lawn, it would make life a lot safer for the rest of us. Instead they get to run loose for years, hurting other children, then they get a slap on the wrist, and finally the “justice” system turns them loose to do it again! Rape a child, get the needle, or go to jail until the day you die. That and that alone would be justice for the victims of this heinous crime.
Posted by: Crystal Rose | January 18, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
There’s something disturbing about people who claim to want to execute child molesters in a country where it’s very often difficult to execute even convicted murderers and yet our far from perfect legal system has probably executed innocent people. The comment by Cokie Roberts is just flippant and stupid.
Posted by: CassandraT | January 19, 2010, 7:23 am 7:23 am
Cokie Roberts stock just jumped up 25 points in my book…
Posted by: twinstick | January 19, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Right on, Cokie! I’ve been a lawyer for 30 years and I couldn’t agree more!
Posted by: Michael Bond | January 19, 2010, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Cokie is right! The 40 something year old man drugged and raped a 13 year old girl. Have you read the transcript of her account of the incident? I mean, he repeatedly vaginally and anally raped her, and she protested and tried to get away. This was not a “date” or something. So to quote Whoopie Goldberg, who I adore, it was “rape rape.”
Posted by: wtf | January 20, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
The imposed sentence that Polanski fled from was only 90 days, I believe. Now Cokie thinks he should be executed?! I find that hilarious.
Posted by: stompermc1 | January 20, 2010, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
He will never come back to the US to be tried, lets forget about this case now and focus on something more relevant to today.
Posted by: Songjiang ESL | January 21, 2010, 12:52 am 12:52 am
I might agree to that,
IF you FIRST shoot EVERY LAST child murderer in our prisons.
Shoot them first, THEN we’ll talk.
Posted by: DMead | January 21, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am
wow,
did cokie roberts just become a fan of the death penalty?
Posted by: rwolfman | January 21, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Ok liberal press and Hollywood defenders of Polanski.
Let’s turn this around and say that it was YOUR 13 year old daughter that was raped by this “artist.”
Would you still feel that he has “done enough suffering?” and should be dropped of all charges?
I didn’t think so.
Posted by: Joe American | January 21, 2010, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Then dig the SOB up and shoot him again. Cokie can anchor my newscast anytime she wants.
Posted by: Robert Irmas | January 22, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am
I like my newscasters to at least try to remain objective. BTW, when did Cokies’ opinion matter?
Posted by: Randy | January 23, 2010, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Do any of you people know that Polanski is wanted under a bench warrant, and any one wanted under a bench warrant can be shot on sight by a bounty hunter. Cokie’s right, save our taxpapers a tremendous amount of money. He’s had thirty years, enough is enough.
Posted by: Millard | January 23, 2010, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
All Cokie did what echo the sentiments of most (90%) of the public. That leaves the other 10% of bleeding hearts to criticie her. Guess what, most people belive ALL pedophiles should be shot. We’ve seen enough “politically correct” treatment of them, especially when they have some kind of notariaty.
RAPE is RAPE. SHAME on Whoopie,I’ve lost ALL respect for you. Hurrah for Cokie.
Posted by: Comeon | January 24, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
I agree with Cokie 100%.
Posted by: Michael L. Philips | January 24, 2010, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Frankly, Robert’s comments appears to mirror the mentality of many people in the country that still believe in back wood’s justice…”lynch the #$@%$$@#. And that’s the kind of person allowed to appear on national TV as a political commentator.
Posted by: J. Lawson | January 25, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Wowwee wow…we got Bin Laden living free and easy like royalty…thanks george!!!… and this goof is worrying about Polanski? She wants to kill the guy? Really? Hey,it was a long time ago,the girl admits to not really telling him she was under age, everybody was high back then, Polanski was an idiot with a lot of money and a lot of blow…like everybody in the fast lane that these folks were living in, and he admits to being an idiot.And the girl is an older woman now and wants this to just go away. So what’s the deal? He was supposed to get 90 days and pay the mother off ,who instigated the whole thing anyway, she was a bigger user that the daughter,but he heard that some zealous California States Attorney was going to recommend life or something crazy. So he took off….And this Cokie Roberts wants to kill the dude? Wow. Was she even around back then? It was a whole different time. People did the most crazy and stupid thing with each other, older girls with young guys and young girls using older guys.I was 17 and my girlfriend was 25 and stunning,she was a dancer. I still think about her 50 years later.Of course she dumped me,I was a child,but… It was a different world,I sure wouldn’t want to be young in this one. No one is saying the dude is a saint or anything but killing him? Really?
Posted by: GP | January 26, 2010, 1:12 am 1:12 am
I went through just about all of the comments and haven’t really found one that has told me much. Does anyone know what the plea-bargain deal was or why the judge backed out and planned to send this guy up the river – before the trial? I will admit that I have opinions just like everybody else. Like folks are saying, protect the victim. I get the feeling most of these people complaining just like to hear themselves talk.
Posted by: James L. | January 26, 2010, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Amen Cokie! Not just Roman Polanski, but any & all who drug, rape &/or sodomize a child should be shot. If the American justice system would implement the (quick) death penalty we would definitely see a decrease in these cases!
Posted by: Wendy | January 27, 2010, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Hey George, good luck getting that job at the White House. I might agree with some of the sentiments, but you know the government. They plan to spend $1B of my tax money on a trail of the 9/11 guys that have confessed. They ‘may’ be convicted and then will appeal for about 20 years. Then, either we will let them go or feed them. Now, clarify what the difference in this and the Polanski thing. Oh yeah, Polanski ‘may’ have done things to a young girl, while these guys murder children and folks from 60 countries. Good call.
Posted by: James L. | January 27, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
What jayce? What are you talking about? This is the first impressive thing that Roberts has stated in years. Polanski is a criminal. Polanski did rape and sodomize a young girl. Polanski did run from justice. AND people like you, unintelligent as you may be, defend the loser. Look, jayce, if you can’t handle an opinion that doesn’t completely lick Polanski’s boots then get lost.
Posted by: Mike | January 28, 2010, 7:07 am 7:07 am
Randomly advocating extrajudicial execution for crimes where no state in this country applies the death penalty is irresponsible and unprofessional. Roberts should retract the remark. Recommending that people you simply don’t like be killed is no way to conduct yourself on television.
Posted by: JP | January 28, 2010, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
It is unfortunate that Cokie Roberts said take him out an just shoot him. The rule of law will be used and he will either be extradited to the United States or he won’t be. He will go to prison if he is extradited to the U.S. and there he will die. I suggest to all that the rule of law be used in anything regarding Roman Polanski. The longer Polanski is able to drag this out the longer he stays free and the closer he comes to dying a natural death, which would save a lot of money for the U.S. because it costs a lot to house a prisoner. Let’s hope he dies before he is extradited so the U.S. doesn’t have to spend the money and time dealing with sending him to prison.
Posted by: Peter Marks | January 29, 2010, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Polanski is a fugitive from the U.S. judicial system. He is accused of raping a child. These facts are not in dispute.
His “brilliance” as an artist or his admirers’ belief in his innocence is irrelevant. He needs to be extradited and tried, plus any applicable time for his jumping bail.
That being said, it would be less expensive to simply shoot him.
The Council has ruled.
Posted by: The Council | February 1, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am
The victim wants this dropped.
More big fuss is hurting her.
Supposedly the amount of further
jail time to be served would be
puny anyway. Not worth the legal
cost to taxpayers. This seems to
be more about tabloid media hype
than equal enforcement of law.
If you think the Roman Polanski thing
is bizarre, look at this other case
and ponder the rationale.
An Oklahoma foster contractor family
raped a foster girl as a GROUP and
after the criminal conviction, the
Judge decided not to give them ANY
prison time OR FINES because one is
the family’s breadwinner and putting
him in prison would be a hardship
for the family.
Judge Ray Dean Linder gave the parents
10-year suspended prison sentences, but
required Penny Tyler to actually serve
60 days in the county jail.
Have you ever heard of a family
all convicted of raping one child
allowed to continue being parents
and allowed to claim breadwinner
and family obligation hardships
to avoid prison??
At least they were convicted in
a criminal court, that’s more than
most accused parents get!
Family Courts are corrupt and remove
mostly kids who should not be removed.
All it takes is a social workers attitude!
Rumour, innuendo, caseworker perjury
and hearsay are all used to make
85% of the cases which are garbage
or “make work” cases to pad the
statistics and qualify for more funding.
The “”Child Protection”" INDUSTRY
actually does more harm than good.
They long ago went way past the
“slippery slope” regarding second
guessing parents.
Some points to ponder about the Oklahoma case:
This family raped a foster kid
( as a GROUP! ) and the system wants
to keep them together as a family??
They don’t give most blood parents
that kind of consideration!
They REMOVE kids from blood
parents for almost NOTHING!
Are they going easy on the rapists
because they were “”insiders”" as the
states certified chosen contractors?
Are they going easy to keep the adoption
subsidy money flowing through the state?
(Nah, they’d get that with new placements.)
Going easy on them so the state
is not asked to hand back the BONUS
money the state got for letting these
“”superior”" people adopt the kids?
(Nah, They can and do get that all over again!)
Is it possible that this is a move to avoid
big civil suita and even more huge cash
payouts for other kids where the agency
made them “orphans of the living” only to
put the kids into genuine danger?
(Bingo!)
Working to keep this group rape family
together while tearing apart thousands
of other families over imaginings and
hysteria is just plain assenine.
But it’s more “”fun”" to worry about Polanski, right?
Posted by: Greegor47@gmail.com | February 3, 2010, 7:03 am 7:03 am
Go Cokie
Posted by: Starfire | February 3, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Teenagers frontal lobe is not fully developed. That is why they make bad decisions and that is why we hold parents responsible for their teens.
Take the parents and Mr. Polanski’s heads as far as I’m concerned.
Posted by: doodoo | February 5, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Polanski was found guilty by a court of law.
Polanski fled the US to avoid sentencing.
Why does everyone debate whether or not he was guilty? HE WAS FOUND GUILTY BY A US COURT OF LAW.
It is offensive that people offer justification for his fleeing — and try to make this a debate over whether or not he was guilty. EVERYONE in prison is not guilty. Guess they should all run away too.
The real embarassment here is that the US let him run around Europe for years without trying to extradite him.
The American Legal system may not be perfect, but it should be respected. If the situation was reversed, and he was found guilty in a French or Swiss court and fled to the US, there would be no end to the angry demands that we respect their legal system and send him back.
Posted by: SamiJ | February 9, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Why is this even a debate. He confessed. He fled from justice. End of story. I agree with Cokie Roberts for once. Give me 10 minutes and I’ll allow him 5 minutes of that for prayer.
Posted by: Dale | February 10, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am
It is commendable that the victim has forgiven the perpetrator and her mother. However, what does this have to do with the State’s need to punish the admitted offender, a 40-something offender who had sex and gave drugs to a 13 yr old? The Prosecutor often charges crimes where the victim does not wish prosecution. And if this same event happened today, Polanski’s punishment could be life in prison. An adult must be treated as someone who can control his own actions; the 13 yr old is not an adult and does not have the facility to consent. Most parents of such a 13 yr old would agree with Cokie Roberts; wouldn’t you??
Posted by: PJ | February 11, 2010, 6:50 am 6:50 am
Weeelllll- I am shocked! I fully agree with Cokie for once. Amazing how she gets bashed for this comment, but it’s OK that those people on talk shows, etc, who have defended Polanski say it’s not a big deal because…they say it so calmly and make an intelligent argument?? What the heck?
Posted by: Loretta | February 13, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Roman Polanski should face the same justice as somebody doing the same crime but without much money and fame faces. Why doesn’t the US go drag him by his feet out of Switzerland and throw him in the same cell as other child rapists in California. He sure will have plenty of company.
Posted by: John Smith | February 14, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Perhaps a more fitting punishment would be for Mr. Polanski to have to watch Cokie Roberts 24/7 in his cell….
Posted by: EB | February 15, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Oh, if only they could have panned to far left Nation editor Van Den Huevel after that shocking statement from her fellow leftist, albeit one not as Marx-y.
Darn.
Posted by: Jon | February 15, 2010, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
What about the story floating around that Polanski was enticed (Entrapped,a good defense, if the girl had been law enforcement) and that he was being blackmailed for 5 million dollars. That Superior Court Judge, who had been a Justice of the Peace where Republic Studios was, had a great honorable reputation
Posted by: richard Fusilier | February 16, 2010, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Polanski is a pervert and should be given the same opportunity to experience the depraved actions he visited upon a thirteen year old girl. Namely, a drugging and raping and sodomizing. A ten or twenty year sentence in one of our better country club prisons like Leavenworth, ( a little facetiousness here), should provide that opportunity very well.
Posted by: Ron Cee | February 17, 2010, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Sorry Cokie but shooting is to good for him. He should be d-emasculated (as in all genitalia removed)and put in with the “general population” of the worst prison in the country.
Posted by: Shelby Roderfeld | February 17, 2010, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Well LM….nothing like blaming the victim. She was a child. A child. He was a grown man with drugs and a sick mind. No…the blame is all his. He is the one that chose to take advantage of a young girl. He should take his consequences. BUT…do NOT blame the victim. How archaic of you!
Posted by: Ala | February 18, 2010, 5:25 am 5:25 am
The [now] woman who was Polanski’s victim wants it forgotten so that she and her family may get on with their lives.
I can sympathize with that desire. Here’s the thing, though…pedophilia has a very high rate of recidivism. In other words, it is highly unlikely that Polanski can/will just ‘see the light’ and stop molesting children.
So, even if the victim of long ago is ‘over it’, what of the children there may been since, and probably will be in the future? Do they not deserve justice, or a reprieve? Must they be made to suffer…? It is a sickness and a crime. Seriously, in what country are there no children?
Posted by: Patrice | February 23, 2010, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Roman Polanski, did a horrible thing a LONG time ago. His victim does NOT want this all stirred up.
THE basic problem is all the HIPOCRITES that Can’t FORGIVE.
This world of Perfect credit and Perfect lives does not exist.
YOU can’t take the 1960-1970′s and act like all was normal because it was not.
Anymore than you can compare your life to yoru parents. Different time’s wrong is wrong and riht is right.
BUT this system of “perfect” must go away.
Even though I believe he should pay a fine and do good community service.
Putting everyonein jail is what is wrong with our justice system.
Put them out on a farm and you will see mor good come from that then the GREED our system has developed. Amen
Posted by: Laurie Yanda | February 24, 2010, 7:36 am 7:36 am
Shoot Him already!! GO COKIE!!!
Posted by: Fan of Cokie | February 25, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Interesting. I’m not one to normally read anything about entertainment though.
Posted by: Frankie Fernendez | October 18, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am