Dems Gang Up on McChrystal
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: With members of Congress set to huddle at the White House this afternoon to discuss Afghanistan strategy with President Obama, leading Democrats are ratcheting up criticism of Gen. Stanley McChrystal for publicly discussing his recommendations to the president as part of the strategic review.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last night told Charlie Rose that McChrystal should be making his arguments only in private.
"Let me say this about Gen. McChrystal, with all due respect: His recommendations to the president should go up the line of command. They shouldn't be in press conferences," said Pelosi, D-Calif.
Pelosi also had praise for Vice President Joe Biden's view — that al Qaeda should be dealt with in Afghanistan through the use of more drone strikes and special forces, not additional troops.
"Let me say this: The vice president's views are ones that widely shared," Pelosi said.
This morning, Sen. Jim Webb, a former Navy secretary and a veteran, said it was "pretty odd" that McChrystal gave an interview to "60 Minutes" and spoke to a London think-tank about his recommendations, even as President Obama deliberates on the best way forward.
"At a time when people were meeting in the White House discussing Afghanistan, he was giving a speech in London," Webb, D-Va., told MSNBC. "I thought that was pretty odd."
At a forum last night, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates said decisions regarding troop strength should not be made as part of a public debate.
But Gates said his comments were "absolutely not" aimed at McChrystal, and he voiced his support for the general's leadership in Afghanistan.
McChrystal's grave assessment of the situation in Iraq was leaked to The Washington Post last month. The Obama administration has resisted calls from members of Congress to have McChrystal testify in front of Congress on his recommendations before the president makes up his mind.
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Somebody tell Pelosi that accusations and lies about the CIA should be done in meetings and not press conferences televised internationally. What a hypocritical wench. McChrystals recommendation is exactly the same as the previous General. Now that the Dems fired one General to install their own and he agrees with the previous, it’s time to smear him and get rid of him too. The Dems have no backbone or stomach to win this war. Well, they told us that publically about Iraq too didn’t they? Support the troop increase or bring our troops home and embarrass us throughout the world.
Posted by: lfrichar | October 6, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
“”"”"”"Sen. Jim Webb, said it was “pretty odd” that McChrystal gave an interview to “60 Minutes” even as President Obama deliberates”"”"” Well Mr. Webb, we veterans and many civilians find it “pretty odd” Obama is galavanting all over Europe trying to repay his Chicago buddies with the olympics while a General is requesting more troops and you are not granting them. What a group of hypocrites.
Posted by: lfrichar | October 6, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
A decision to actually “go to war” is one thing, but a decision to support your General with resources is a no brainer. This is an embarrassment. This administration has less military and war experience than any administration in recent history. Listen to your Generals and grant the request you imbeciles.
Posted by: lfrichar | October 6, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Its funny how all over sudden, the house and congress become experts on military warfare. With no common sense or enything else. Gen. Patton (WWII)had to deal with the same incompetence, Gen. McChrystal is facing now.
Posted by: Lizzie | October 6, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
we are the laughing stock of our enemies. we are letting micheal moore , cindy sheehan, george soros and nacy pelosi run this country into the ground while the president seems to be more concerned about the olympics in chicago.
Posted by: catman | October 6, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Civilian rule over the Military is a wise safeguard provided by the Constitution, with the foresight and hindsight of the framers.
Funny how the right can talk about the constitution and the founding fathers then totally ignore it, and them, when it fits their agenda.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
One controversy after another with this administration.
Posted by: LongT | October 6, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
thinking…sounds like its your agenda.
Posted by: catman | October 6, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
If McChrystal HADN’T talked about it on 60 minutes, the President would still be “thinking about it” and no one would know what is going on.
McChrystal, PLEASE KEEP US INFORMED!
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 6, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Thinking, don’t waste your breath. These people are not patriots. I actually used to believe they were. I think they’re radicals that only show their loyalty when their people are in position of power. It’s them or nothing. I wonder where we’ve heard this before. Oh, that’s right…the terrorists!
Posted by: David | October 6, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
If McChrystal HADN’T talked about it on 60 minutes, the President would still be “thinking about it” and no one would know what is going on.
****************************************
Seems to me that Afganistan was one of the first decisions that Obama made. I also remember that it was totaly ignored under Republican rule for about 7 years.
Gen. McChrystal report was made under the request (order) of the President.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
the dems are getting downright nixonian. don’t like the guy in the position…replace him with someone you think will better suit your position…when he doesn’t tow the line, trash him and ask for someone different. eventually, you might get someone who tells you what you want to hear. so, if patreaus was “betray us” what is mchrystal?
Posted by: davidfrat21 | October 6, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Pelosi should have gone to the CIA
and voiced her concerns about the
situation there and not air it on tv
before getting her facts. How do you
spell hypocrite?? That would be PELOSI.
Posted by: wis134 | October 6, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Interesting, Its ok for the VP to openly state his position, but not the guy whose actual JOB it is to carry out the mission?
Every single day this administration and this liberal love fest of a congress display just how out of touch they are with reality.
I would echo lfrichar’s comment about Pelosi’s mouth. Typical, Typicasl, Typical Liberal -> “Do AS I SAY, Not as I DO”
By the way NANCY…
It is hard to convey a private message in a conversation that only has ONE participant!
Posted by: Mike_C | October 6, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Interesting, Its ok for the VP to openly state his position, but not the guy whose actual JOB it is to carry out the mission?
****************************************
It seems to me that the President is the Commander in Chief of the Military, and the VP being 1st in line for succession has more to say how the war is to be prosecuted then the General.
2nd it seems to me that the President hasn’t yet taken action on the recommendations made by McChrystal.
3rd McChrystal’s report was not taken lightly by the Democrats or the Republicans, that is there is little support for escalation of troop levels or even staying in there.
4th if the President should choose to support the recommendations of the General, he has made the political environment of doing so more difficult.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Boy, this really burns me up to hear these IDIOT liberals who don’t know their head from the hole in their rear end, try and tell the General how to run the war. The number one job of any president is as commander in chief, yet Obama’s top priority is getting the Olimpics for his criminal buddies in Chicago, and destroying our health care system. He should be impeached for dereliction of duty. He is going to get alot of our boys killed. Oh yeah, before you all cry “where were you when Bush was president”, I was screaming about him as well, you all wouldn’t listen. You would just say “oh you’re just throwing Bush under the bus”.
Posted by: LeftyNOT | October 6, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
At least Biden and myself are on the same page…”drone strikes and special forces can get the job done.”
Posted by: Duality in Harmony | October 6, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
OK – lets see – the CIA info should be public and the military info should be private. Sounds like Barry and Nancy are scared of the left.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | October 6, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
It seems to me that the President is the Commander in Chief of the Military, and the VP being 1st in line for succession has more to say how the war is to be prosecuted then the General.
====================================
LOL…CLUELESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!
Biden is a career politician who never served in any capacity.
The concept that his assestment of prosecuted a war by using offshore techniques is to be taken as more influential than the presidential hand-picked commander on the ground is childish at best.
Perhaps rather galavanting around the country trying ram a now failed stimulator, cap & trade, and Obamacare down the country’s throat, perhaps he should have stayed in contact with his own choice to command.
So far Biden, Geithner, and the crew have been so right on with there assessment of things that that most common phrase coming out of this administration is “We misread it”
Posted by: Mike_C | October 6, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Rick Klein is Hannitys son
Posted by: bill | October 6, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
LOL…CLUELESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!
Biden is a career politician who never served in any capacity.
****************************************
I see then you do not believe in Civilian Control of the Military. That the Military should be allowed to go directly to the public to decide how to prosecute wars.
You really think that would work?
Talking about LOL
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
LOL…CLUELESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!
Biden is a career politician who never served in any capacity.
****************************************
I see then you do not believe in Civilian Control of the Military. That the Military should be allowed to go directly to the public to decide how to prosecute wars.
You really think that would work?
Talking about LOL
————————————–
Elected Leaders set the PolicY!
Military Leaders are the BEST to decide how to implement the policy!
You would trust someone like Obama to decide how to execute a war on a daily bbasis….Well, get ready for another Vietnam-like mess.
Once he decides what he wants to accomplish, he should hand it over to the milatry and give them whatever they need to accomplish the mission. An anniversary just passed this weekend of what happens when politicians try to “send a message” rather send an overwhelming military force to accomplish a mission. Know what it is ?
Posted by: Mike_C | October 6, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
“Gen. McChrystal report was made under the request (order) of the President”
I question the truth of that statement. Regardless, the 60 PAGE REPORT was submitted in August, and McChrystal had no response over a month later. How many times did Obama speak with the Olympic committee in Chicago? The man has his priorities all wrong. Our service men being killed NOW should take priority over the Olympics in 2016, and a healthcare plan that won’t be implemented until 2013 (because he knows if it goes into effect before then, he will be out on his rear).
But alas, it is not popular, so he can’t make a decision yet. PR is everything. Just look at the “photo op” at the Whitehouse yesterday. What MSM doesn’t report is the amount of Doctor’s that have resigned from the AMA because they DON’T SUPPORT GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTHCARE!
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 6, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Elected Leaders set the PolicY!
Military Leaders are the BEST to decide how to implement the policy
****************************************
The Policy has yet to be set. Congress which supplies the funds to support the policy, must be on board the policy, the public, which supports the Congress, must be on board the policy.
These are politcal facts that can not be ignored. The General’s actions were not helpful in his quest for support of his plans?
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Maybe we should send Pelosi and the rest of her democratic buddies. Obama hand picked this general the least they can all do is support him and our TROOPS!!!!
Posted by: karen | October 6, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
I’m glad that America has a Commander in Chief…that takes his time while committing fellow Americans to War…unlike the past administration, he is The Commander in Chief that knows how important it is to “make” policy regarding Wars..and what General has ever publicly held press conferences to discuss what he/she says to the President? McChrystal is wrong for this, and he has Forgotten who he Works for! Leftynot: Bush should have been impeached for derelect of his duties, and Bush was the one who got alot of “boys” killed for a worthless war…the Healthcare system in our country has destroyed our country already, and the Olympics weren’t for his Chicago buddies, but for America, and why should anybody listen to you…what’s your expertise….????
I’ll agree…..the public should not be debating “anything” on the war at this stage…It was debated 8 years ago…now that we are in there, WE have a Commander in Chief, yes, whether you like “him” or not…..We have one. End of story.
Posted by: sara | October 6, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
The General’s actions woke up a sleeping President who fails to grasp the situation.
This is EXACTLY why many of us were very very concerned with having this man as President. He is STILL campaigning, and has yet to understand it is time to actually govern.
I have no problem with his little party trip to try sway the IOC, but the perception he is creating is one of a perpetual campaigner. The problem is he has no idea what is campaigning for!
It was easy to criticize the previous administration, no quite as easy to sit there and make the call on your own!
This should have been already figured out, the possiblities were very limited and strategies could have been formed months ago for each of the possible outcomes.
Now, he simply appears weak, this is evidenced by the actions of many of our adversaries in the world. I wish I was wrong on this, but I am afraid his methods will continue to prove me right.
Posted by: Mike_C | October 6, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
“Gen. McChrystal report was made under the request (order) of the President”
I question the truth of that statement.
***************************************
It was widely reported, back in May when McChrystal took over command, that Gates ordered McChrystal to give an assessment of the war Policies in Afghanistan.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
lfrichar | Oct 6, 2009 11:30:33 AM
“lfrichar”; As a veteran, are you familar with the ditty “Loose Lips Sink Ships?” Any application here?
Posted by: bobj72 | October 6, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Ifrichar: Oct 6 …. if you’re a veteran, then Bush and Cheney are too! I’m married to a veteran, and he doesn’t speak as you do. Fraud.
Posted by: sara | October 6, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Just keep firing the ground commanders sooner or later you will get one that is a yes man,and will be the dog washer at the White House,while the war drags on or is lost.
Posted by: marion | October 6, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
It was easy to criticize the previous administration, no quite as easy to sit there and make the call on your own!
****************************************
Hmmm,…. Nearly 7 years without direction in Afghanistan and now you want instant reaction from the President. He asked for a reassessment from McChrystal, he now has that, along with many others, including the joint chiefs I am sure. Do you know what they have reported or said? NO? I didn’t think so. I just know that you are completely informed of the situation, options, and costs.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
I’m so glad he is taking his time to “decide” on a policy.
Im sure that comes as great comfort to those troops over there. Finally now, he is going to “take the time” to consider this issue.
As I said, all possibilities could have & should have been already analyzed and a series of possible policy/actions determined. As commander-In-Chief, It is Obama’s responsibility to make sure that has ALREADY been done. Certainly the administration should have known the current situation was a very real possibility and palnned accordingly!
Posted by: Mike_C | October 6, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
“Gen. McChrystal report was made under the request (order) of the President”
I question the truth of that statement.
***************************************
It was widely reported, back in May when McChrystal took over command, that Gates ordered McChrystal to give an assessment of the war Policies in Afghanistan.
**************************************
Thanks for proving that the statement was false. Unless you think Gates is the President!
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 6, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Gen. McChrystal report was made under the request (order) of the President”
I question the truth of that statement.
***************************************
It was widely reported, back in May when McChrystal took over command, that Gates ordered McChrystal to give an assessment of the war Policies in Afghanistan.
**************************************
Thanks for proving that the statement was false. Unless you think Gates is the President!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
How absurd an argument can you provide? Gates works for the President! This is really ridiculous.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
I can’t trust a sentimental strategy of
two wars from Joe and Nancy. GO McChrystals with 40,000 to win or withdraw the war.
Posted by: jr | October 6, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Im sure that comes as great comfort to those troops over there. Finally now, he is going to “take the time” to consider this issue.
****************************************
I am sure that it also provides great comfort to the troops might be sent over to consider the issue. Supporting the troops does not mean sending them into war post haste.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
How absurd an argument can you provide? Gates works for the President! This is really ridic..
The President did NOT make the order by your own words. Can you prove that he had even LOOKED at the 60 pages before McChrystal brought it to everyone’s attention? Or did he let Gates do it, and didn’t really know anything about it?
It is the same situation with the healthcare plan. Has he read it? Does he know what’s in it? Has ANYONE read it? Yet it is getting jammed down everyone’s throat without the allowing time for the truth of the bill’s cost to be exposed.
Everything that is on Obama’s agenda is a CRISIS, Crisis, Crisis. Except our soldier’s being killed daily because they don’t have the assistance they need.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 6, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I applaud Gen. McChrystal for talking about this; he knows this is risky for his career to go over the head of President Obama. I guess he is just tired of his soldiers getting killed because the President is sitting on his hands doing nothing. Soldiers die and Obama is trying to force feed us Healthcare. Parading Doctors in white jackets to the White House for a Photo Opp. This gut is just dangerous for America there is no other way to put it.
Posted by: batesba74 | October 6, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
The President did NOT make the order by your own words. Can you prove that he had even LOOKED at the 60 pages before McChrystal brought it to everyone’s attention? Or did he let Gates do it, and didn’t really know anything about it?
****************************************
Forget it. You know not what you are talking about. Do you know the President didn’t? Of course not. Now you throw in a bunch of conjecture which means you know nothing it.
Gates is the Secretary of Defense he is appointed by the President, works for the President, and reports to the President. He is in the chain of Command. Period.
Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Did it ever occur to anyone that the general probably had to have his appearance on 60 minutes approved by someone up the chain? Let the military do what they are proficient at; let the politicians do what they are good at – ruining our country; traveling around the world for face time, doing meaningless things; ignoring the will of the people.
Posted by: tired of it all | October 6, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
thank yu thinking…i feel so safe now and that my freinds serving in the military are safe because obama is in the chain of command. by only talking to the general once in sixty plus days it speaks volumes as to this administartions priorities. obviously the chicago olympics were of greater importance than our fighting men and women.
Posted by: catman | October 6, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
This govt is the most outrageous in the entire world. Why, of all people, should Pelosi have one iota of a second to be heard? She is NOT a veteran, has never been in war in Afghanistan, and has no knowledge of the situation at all other than what she has heard. I support McChrystal 100%. These pinheads in MY WHITEHOUSE MAKE ME PUKE!!!! THE SOONER THEY ARE GONE, THE BETTER OFF WE ARE ALL GOING TO BE.
Posted by: SouthernGrit | October 6, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
McChrystal’s actions show his frustration and determination to care for the men and women who serve under him, who put their lives on the line while politicians ponder and poster. The situation must be dire, indeed, for a man of his experience to speak out as he has. As a Marine mom, I thank him.
Posted by: pam | October 6, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
And just how does the stupid hypocrital Pelosi think the American people should be informed of what is going on in our govt? I stand up for what is right. Wasn’t BO’s and Pelosi’s words – TRANSPARENCY IN GOVT? I believe that was the word. HOORAY for McChrystal!!!!
Posted by: SouthernGrit | October 6, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Forget it. You know not what you are talking about. Do you know the President didn’t? Of course not. Now you throw in a bunch of conjecture which means you know nothing it.
**************************************
Libs, you gotta love them. They say something, it’s gospel. Conservative says something, it’s conjecture. Your English wasn’t so great on your reply.
**************************************
I am sure that it also provides great comfort to the troops might be sent over to consider the issue. Supporting the troops does not mean sending them into war post haste.
**************************************
Umm…conjecture….If you ask a soldier they will tell you they want protection NOW. The President has had this on his desk (conjecture, maybe it’s been on Gates’ desk) for over a month. In that time soldiers have been killed. It’s time to MAKE A DECISION!
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 6, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
So Pelosi and the democrats are saying that the American people should be kept in the dark, remain uniformed and get their information about the war from only one “official” source – the president. What happened to that whole freedom of speech thing? Are we not supporting that any more?
Posted by: What? | October 6, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Democrats publicly dumping on a General
what a surprise, Pelosi’s so pathetic I hope the people of California get rid of her.
Posted by: hkdakota | October 6, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Democrats publicly dumping on a General
what a surprise, Pelosi’s so pathetic I hope the people of California get rid of her.
***************************************
We need to get rid of a lot of them. I just hope our country can survive that long.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 6, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
lfichar- If I leaked out information regarding my a proposed line of strategy behind my boss’s back, then I would get fired. This General should get fired. In fact if they find he leaked the information he should be tried for treason. He should not be giving our enemy our potential strategy. He should not be embolding them with his contradiction to the COMMANDER AND CHIEF. This was clearly a political move and the armed forces need to stay out of politics. Stop the fear mongering. They always want more troops, and they always play on the public fear to get what they want. They are not the publics body guards for hire. They are the military that has a chain of command and it was clearly broken. They need to find who leaked the info and try them for treason.
Posted by: texas outlaw | October 6, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
What? Military strategy should not be public knowledge. I wonder what comments you had when Cheney had closed door talks regarding our energy policy with the Oil Companies. Soon after the price of gasoline skyrocketed. The Repubicans cried and cried and cried when someone suggested a time line exit of Iraq, saying it would give away our strategy and embolden our enemy, now they are just fine with a General leaking info about strategy, because it is they strategy they want. Hypocrates.
Posted by: texas outlaw | October 6, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Has the General been named as the source of the leak? Has anyone been named as the source? Did it come form the DoD or White House? Lots of calls here for the General to be fired based on the leak without even knowing who leaked it. Could it have been the White House looking to force their own hand in order to give cover from their own parties extreme wing? Could it have been from the DoD who was fed up with inaction? Those of you calling for the Generals termination, do you know who was the source of the leak? If it is found to be the White House, will you call for the termination of the President?
No one in the military appears on any type of television show or gives speaches in public without clearance from the DoD, not even Generals……. Who should be fired for approving his apearance? Gates or Obama?
How many troops have died since the report hit the President desk?
Posted by: Dave J USMC | October 6, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Well said Dave J USMC – Their inaction is inexcusable. 1 month is more than enough for the decision to have been made.
The General deserves another star.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 6, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Obama mentions Abraham Lincoln a lot.
But does he have the mindset of Lincoln to fight a war and win? OOPS! I forgot Lincoln was a Republican. Forget it, we don’t know what Obama is.
Posted by: John Demeter | October 6, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Over the weekend 8 Soldiers died when their outpost was attacked in a remotte area of Afghanistan. Air support and re-inforcements were not readily available. Would more troops have made the difference? We will never know…….
Posted by: Dave J USMC | October 6, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
It appears the General leaked the information because he hasn’t kept his mouth shut since. Who ever leaked the info wants more troops. Who ever leaked the info should be tried for treason. Why is the reporter not obligated to reveal the source or go to jail for aiding in treason? It was top secret information and it is grounds to be charged with treason. We don’t need a rouge General trying to drum up public support by fear mongering to pressure the administration into doing what he wants. That is exactly what this guy is doing.
Posted by: texas outlaw | October 6, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I can’t believe the comments from the “arm chair leaders.” First, in the military there is a chain of command. This is one of the most respected and adhered to philosophys of the military. Second, the general knows he is to follow the chain of command and that he was wrong to ask for more troops in a press conference instead of following the chain of command. Third, all those who are so quick to criticize the president need to check the facts. The President is always in communication with everyone he may ever need. He does not need to stay in the white house 24/7 to do his job. Even though this President is black, he still has the rights and priviledges of all other presidents. He can go as he pleases and anyone who thinks that his trip overseas in some way diminished his ability to act and plan has no idea how any simple organization works let alone the office of the President. Grow up people, it’s obvious too many of you are constantly grasping at anything you can in an attempt to degrade this President.
Posted by: Tsalagi | October 6, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
no one has to grasp at anything. the democrats have single handedly put the republicans back in play. this has been the lamest 9 months of an administration whose same party controls the house and senate ever.one meeting in 60 days with your general. where are our priorities.
Posted by: catman | October 6, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Im sure that comes as great comfort to those troops over there. Finally now, he is going to “take the time” to consider this issue.
****************************************
I am sure that it also provides great comfort to the troops might be sent over to consider the issue. Supporting the troops does not mean sending them into war post haste.
Posted by: Thinking
Since I know more than just a few and have relatives already in Iraq, I can persoanlly guarantee you that the men & women of the military are ready to do what is asked of them. They just do not want to feel like they are 4th or 5th priority on the President’s list!
As I stated, ALL the possible scenarios should have already been analyzed and possible responses drwan up. The president should have ALREADY had ample time to consider these and now we are at a post election outcome and the situation in country is getting worse, he should have his moves ready!
In the REAL world, we call that planning ahead. Talk to a REAL military commander and you will get a grasp on this concept!
Posted by: Mike_C | October 6, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Welcome to the United States of the Democrats. They have no interest in the rest of us (Independents, etc…). Next best thing to a dictatorship. Do it their way or else.
Posted by: TX_MBell | October 6, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Give him the troops or get them the hell out of there. Don’t leave them out to dry while your trying to make up your mind.
The more I think about this controversy with Gen. McChyrstal the more I believe he knew exactly what he was doing. You don’t become a four star Gen by being stupid. Maybe the situation is so dire in Afghanistan that he felt a fire had to be lit under Obama’s ass to get him to decide which way he wants to go.
Posted by: writewingnut | October 6, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
McChrystal is doing the right thing. Obama should have never chewed him out for his conference. He has every right to voice his opinion and keep the american people informed.
Posted by: Kyle | October 6, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
IMPEACH OBAMA FOR DERELICTION OF DUTY!
Posted by: Kyle | October 6, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
lives are on the line and a generals request was made over a month ago and the prez can find time to go to coppenhagen.
Posted by: catman | October 6, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
OK now everyone is saying to listen to the General and give him the soldiers he is asking for…But how many of these same people will be happy with that large amount of troops over there? This is why I believe the media should stay out of foreign affairs and let the army run the way it should be.
Posted by: THinking | October 6, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Why is Obama not sending in the Calvery to help out our soldiers fighting the barbarians? He would rather goes shopping in France and Coppenhagen than support our troops. How much time has he actually spend at his desk doing work? I fear the next three years, I have never feared for this country before in my entire life.
Posted by: TheKingHasNoClothes | October 6, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Edith Bunker – I mean Nancy Pelosi – should be the Last one to say anything about somebody talking about things in public. She is the biggest joke in Washington and be best served by just not saying anything.
Posted by: Bill | October 6, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I wish they’d all keep their mouths shut. The media is the instigater. If they’d report rather than instigate our silly dems & repubs could just do their job and quit worrying about “what will people think….oooh nooooo….”
Posted by: Cindy | October 6, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Since I know more than just a few and have relatives already in Iraq, I can persoanlly guarantee you that the men & women of the military are ready to do what is asked of them. They just do not want to feel like they are 4th or 5th priority on the President’s list!
*****************************************
That is what I love about you guys allways know someone who serves, but never serve.
I served and and I know Period. Stop talking for me. Want to talk about the military experience, whant to claim what they stand for, then serve dam it!
Posted by: Thinking | October 7, 2009, 1:57 am 1:57 am
McChrystal should have been fired not promoted. He was involved in the Pat Tillman cover up and should have been booted out of the Army when his role was found out. Big mistake on the Presidents part putting him in charge of anything.
Posted by: Trent | October 7, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am
It was said that President Reagan never met a defense system he didn’t like and Democrats never met a soldier they did. The more things change the more they remain the same.
Anyone who has worn stars on his shoulder is in a position to tell the General that he is wrong. The rest of us should shut up and listen. We might just learn a few things. That includes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi and a few others.
Posted by: oonogil | October 7, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Trent,
I’m amazed by people who think foot ballplayers and other entertainers are the most important people on the planet. Tillman was a soldier, he deserved that respect. The fact that he was a ball player shouldn’t make any difference to anyone.
Stop crying because Michael Jackson died, take the ‘3′ off of your car and accept that Elvis is dead.
Don’t use a dead soldiers name to make a political point.
Posted by: oonogil | October 7, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Ok those of you who don’t seem to understand anyting – even if it is right before your eyes. What is McChrystal up to? It couldn’t be that he is “politiking” with those that think like him (I.E. conservatives who would like war to be a continuing phenomenon) – could it? Why do these people push for a continuing state of war? Do any of you have any idea how much money those – that Republicans represent – make in times of war? We, the American people have to start figuring this type of world out and saying NO to these types of people. We need to continue to put our money into the “intelligence gathering sector” like we have been doing versus throwing it away in countries that are culturally and religiously obtuse to our definitions of freedom and liberty and independence.
Posted by: CND FOX | October 7, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
texas outlaw — Did it not occur to you General McChrystal is also the NATO Commander and he is required to brief Europe and our NATO allies? A simple request for troops is not endangering our supposed strategies at all. Our politicians are doing the same thing over here. McChrystal is showing great restraint as Obama’s friend by not resigning for lack of support.
Posted by: lfrichar | October 7, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Hey all, Obama has had since January 20th to devise “his” strategy on Afghanistan. General McKiernan, before he was fired by Obama, said he wanted more than the 21000 troops Congress authorized. So, to recap, Obama new in January we needed more troops, fired that General and handpicked McChrystal. After 3 months of an assessment, he says we need more troops. It feels like an attitude of “oh, that’s right we are still at war” from this administration. That 3 AM call, Obama failed that one!
Posted by: lfrichar | October 7, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
The Libs finally found somebody in Afghanistan that they want to fight! It’s Gen. McChrystal.
–This morning, Sen. Jim Webb, a former Navy secretary and a veteran, said it was “pretty odd” that McChrystal gave an interview to “60 Minutes” and spoke to a London think-tank about his recommendations, even as President Obama deliberates on the best way forward.–
You know what else is pretty odd? That Jim Webb cuddles up with the murderous Burmese junta by giving them a propaganda platform in his committee. Then he invites NO members of the democratic opposition. Worse yet, he LIED when he said Aung San Suu Kyi would agree to the US easing sanctions on Burma.
Posted by: Appeasement Czar | October 7, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm