By Kristina Wong

Oct 19, 2009 6:19pm

Finance Bill’s Final Language: 1,502 Pages

ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf reports: In the weeks that the Senate Finance Committee was marking up Chairman Max Baucus’ health reform plan there was a lot of grumbling from Republicans that the process was not transparent enough because the Senators were considering a 262 page outline written in “conceptual” language, which is lawmaker’s attempt at plain English. Democrats on the Finance Committee, citing a Committee precedent, argued that the Baucus bill was more understandable in conceptual language than in legislative language, and pointed out that the Baucus bill was never more than one of two bills informing the final product in the Senate – that new bill, which merges the Finance bill with the more liberal HELP Committee bill, is being written behind closed doors. Baucus, lead HELP Democrat Chris Dodd and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are set to meet this evening with representatives from the White House to chart their progress. In other words – the Finance Committee worked for months to create a bill, which was then set aside as Democratic leaders went about writing it all over again. The fact that the Baucus bill has been shelved as Democrats go about the bill merger process did not keep some poor soul at the Committee office from having to take the Baucus bill’s conceptual language and turn it into legislative language. The result, with larger font and margins and double spacing, swells the product from 262 pages to 1,502.
The conceptual version: http://www.finance.senate.gov/sitepages/leg/LEG%202009/100209_Americas_Healthy_Future_Act_AMENDED.pdf
The legislative language version: http://finance.senate.gov/press/Bpress/2009press/prb101909.pdf That’s longer than the HELP Committee’s bill, which rang in at 839 pages and the House Energy and Commerce Committee version – 1017 pages: http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20090714/aahca.pdf Republican leaders have made an talking point of the length of bills, or as the Senate Minority Leader puts it in floor speeches – “…another thousand-page, trillion-dollar government takeover…”  It has been an effective talking point; moderate Democrats are insisting that whatever bill the Democratic leaders and the White House craft be online in legislative text for 72 hours before a cloture vote, a final vote in the Senate and a final vote from conference to reconcile it with what the House passes. That’s 9 days having a bill online so the public can read it.

User Comments

Yes, this bill is far too large. It should be voted down for no other reason than that. I mean, Republican bills were never more than two pages, right?
This is a ridiculous “story.”

Posted by: Matt | October 19, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

What is ridiculous is the constant compare to a repub bill. And that people don’t care our balance of power is not balanced. Wake UP!

Posted by: bits | October 19, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

If they have to hide in secret rooms to write the bill, then it must not be very good. Throw it in the dumpster where it belongs, so that the Dems have something to fall on in 2010.

Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

If they have to hide in secret rooms to write the bill,
Jeff | Oct 19, 2009 10:18:54 PM
Uh, the room is in the Capital, probably one of the dozens that have been used for over a hundred years to do exactly this. Nothing secret about it.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 19, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Yes, that people don’t care our balance of power is not balanced.

Posted by: BIS Computer | October 20, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am

How come I read on another network that The new ABC/Washington Post poll shows %57 of Americans support a public option…but no mention of it on The Note? Hmmmm. Could it be The Note prefers to highlight the Republican agenda? Do you think The Note is biased?

Posted by: Amy in Maine | October 20, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.