By Kristina Wong

Oct 22, 2009 7:50pm

From the Fact Check Desk: Did McKiernan’s Troop Requests Just Sit on Bush White House Desks?

Jake Tapper and Luis Martinez report:

Responding to Vice President Cheney’s accusation that President Obama is “dithering” by taking time to assess a new strategy in Afghanistan, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs earlier today said  “the vice president was for seven years not focused on Afghanistan. Even more curious given the fact that an increase in troops sat on desks in this White House, including the vice president's, for more than eight months, a resource request filled by President Obama in March.”

Is that accurate?

It’s a bit more nuanced than that.

The troop requests to which Gibbs referred were made by then-Gen. David McKiernan. McKiernan started off making individual requests for brigades, and that list kept growing.

Officials from that time say that demands in Iraq prevented the Bush administration from fulfilling the requests until just before Bush left office. (Prioritizing troops to Iraq over those to Afghanistan is, of course, a choice.)

In his first interview after being fired by Defense Secretary Gates over the summer, McKiernan told the Washington Post about his appointment to command ISAF troops in Afghanistan in June 2008: "There was a saying when I got there: If you're in Iraq and you need something, you ask for it. If you're in Afghanistan and you need it, you figure out how to do without it."

In retrospect McKiernan’s troop requests ultimately added up to roughly 30,000 more troops, a combination of combat units and support troops.

Throughout most of 2008, the Bush administration tried to get NATO countries to fill that gap, though they had to have known that would be a challenge.  By the late summer, 2008 Bush administration officials realized NATO wasn’t going to come through. 

In September 2008 that led the Pentagon to order 2,000 Marines to replace Marines sent to Afghanistan in January as a one-time deployment.   At the same time, it also ordered in the first of the additional four combat brigades that McKiernan had requested.  This unit of 3,700 soldiers would arrive in January, 2009 and had been originally scheduled to deploy to Iraq.

In December 2008, President Bush sent 2,800 troops to Afghanistan from an aviation brigade that McKiernan had also requested.

So as McKiernan’s outstanding requests for more forces accumulated throughout 2008 to roughly 30,000 soldiers, President Bush sent at least 6,800 troops – months and months after the requests had come in.

By March, President Obama had ordered 21,000 more troops to Afghanistan – which can be seen as roughly the outstanding balance of McKiernan’s original request.

So Gibbs’s claim that for “eight months” McKiernan’s request for troops “sat on desks” isn’t accurate.

But those request weren’t exactly being met with the urgency Cheney has suddenly decided President Obama must meet, lest he be seen as “dithering.”

– Jake Tapper and Luis Martinez

User Comments

Interesting, and thanks.
Though Obama is well past acting with urgency, and ‘suddenly’ doesn’t really apply any more.

Posted by: MayBee | October 22, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Thank you Jake. Seeing that you look into makes me have some (still little) faith in journalism today.

Posted by: doesitreallymatter | October 22, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

“‘I assume that the war in Afghanistan is over, or is the contention that you have that it continues?’ she said to a reporter.
“A few moments later, she said: ‘This isn’t about the duration of the war. The war in Afghanistan is over.’”
–Nancy Pelosi, April 2005

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 22, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

I agree. Nice job, and thanks for the info.

Posted by: Danny | October 22, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

I for on don’t beleive anything I read on the news media they are in the bathtub for Obama. adc cbs cnn nbc c/span 1 2 npr all liberal loons.

Posted by: DANIEL | October 22, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Jake can you tell obama the past is gone. And to live in the present and think about the future.
Why does Bush did it make it ok?
This only makes obama look more like bush. Or is this a way to make bush look good?
Or just a distraction from health care.

Posted by: Point the finger | October 22, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Once again Jake prooves that he is one of the last honest journalists out there. Ask a question, gather “the facts” and then disclose all those facts in a well written article! Nice work!

Posted by: FoundingFathers | October 22, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

I want to know at what point Barack Obama was brought into war planning.
I remember it was a very active transition period for him. When did the Pentagon and the WH start asking for his input?

Posted by: MayBee | October 22, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Thanks, that sheds some light. Winning in Iraq obviously required resources that would have been welcomed in Afghanistan. As they could be spared, they were redeployed — under both administrations. Now that Iraq is far less a drain, the reasons for delays in meeting requests for more troops in Afghanistan are less apparent.

Posted by: everysandwich | October 22, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

This is all a bunch ofB>>> S>>>. Bush did a good job in Irac now ODUMA lies again as usual,because this idiot does not know what to do next. Where is his prompter he may answer someone else es reply All BS.

Posted by: Joeray | October 22, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

If the Dems get backed into a corner just bring up Bush right?
The Dems are turning out to be a bigger joke than they claim the GOP to be.
The Dems keep saying how bad the Bush years were but now they are in office they and their most ardent far left fans are turning out to be a joke.
Wow what a thing be a far right fascist (according to the far left loons) or be a laughing stock by most.
Keep blaming Bush and the GOP it helps you look far less foolish. Yeah right. Just because many people hate or hated the GOP does not give the Dems a magic pass. Here is a little secret Mr Gibbs people can hate BOTH parties and make them BOTH a joke (the Dems are in power however so you guys get the attention, sucks to be the party in power or didn’t you get that memo?)
Sorry to be the one to tell you sir.

Posted by: David from WI | October 22, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

The piece above reveals Cheney has the ultimate hypocrite. His administration prioritized Iraq and left Afghanistan to simmer on the back burner until it boiled.
Al Qaeda and the Taliban had time to reestablish themselves, and we’re paying for that now – so are our troops.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

doese everyone think that disions made during war should be snap dissions? god way ti get alot of people killed, and alot of money wasted. Obama is doing the right thing.

Posted by: bayou salado | October 22, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Questions:
Isn’t it a fact that the enemy opposition has increased in Afghanistan and decreased in Iraq over the last 8 months?
Isn’t it a fact that the deaths of our soldiers has almost doubled in Afghanistan when compared to last year’s deaths?
Isn’t a fact that Obama said in March that they had already thoroughly evaluated the Afghanistan war and had a plan that did not seem disturbed by the Afghani elections?
Isn’t it a fact that Bush did his best to help in Obama’s transition by offering all of their help and to keep quiet about policies he chose to keep?
I guess it seems a lot more nuanced that what was presented here. Thanks.

Posted by: SjB | October 22, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

So, Cheney is saying the incoming administration should’ve paid more attention to intelligence advice from the previous administration? The same sort of attention he & Bush gave to the info regarding Al Queda? Wasn’t there some silly doc with a misleading title like, “Al Queda determined to attack on US soil?”

Posted by: tiredgirlie | October 22, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

sorry useing one hand does’t work very well for me:correction it’s good, not god, sorry for my spelling.

Posted by: bayou salado | October 22, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Mr. Obama seems to be blaming everyone but himself for all the problems of this world.

Posted by: young_voter | October 22, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

This man lost all my respect when he decided to “blow smoke” and claim hundreds of thousands of people have been helped by their actions on mortgage foreclosures! It’s a crock! It’s a lie! Bring on 2012 because this man is a liar! Gift of gab – sure! Liar – oh most definitely!

Posted by: Michael W | October 22, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Don’t forget it was the Bush administration (Rumsfeld) who said the United States had the resources to fight wars on two fronts.
Turns out he was wrong. While resources were directed to Iraq by that administration, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were steadily regrouping in Afghanistan (and of course across the border in Pakistan).
They should never have been allowed that opportunity.
Again, the Bush administration’s very questionable decision to shift resources to attack Iraq plays a key role, as does the heavy right wing propaganda campaign to convince America Hussein was involved in 9/11.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

S/B
NO It isn’t a fact!!

Posted by: Sharonkathleen | October 22, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Does anybody still listen to Cheney’s rantings? This desperate old man is an embarrassment all to himself and his sidekick, George Bush. Afghanistan was not a priority to them because Saddam had WMD and was responsible for 9/11.

Posted by: what667 | October 22, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Bush realized early on that Afghanistan was a lost cause. Not a lost war, just a lost cause. He failed to get Osama, so there was no major point to be made in nation building. It was somewhat important, because there was still a chance Osama could be located and taken out, and because Pakistan needed to be persuaded to help out, but he felt Iraq was more important. That was Barack Obama’s major point about Bush, but it missed the point. In Afghanistan the US could hold its own, and Al Qaida was, in fact driven out, so the war was not “lost”. In Iraq, to withdraw would have given Al Qaida the victory, the US, the loss, of the war. To withdraw from Afghanistan now would give the Taliban, and Al Qaida the victory and the US the loss precisely because of their resurgence. Do you get the nuaunce here? It is major, but will escape the understanding of most. Iraq was won, at some high cost, but won. Afghanistan could not be won, but until now it was not lost. It now must be won.

Posted by: JSB | October 22, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

The Bush/Cheney administration took the emphasis off Afghanistan (where it belonged) and attacked not-involved-in-9/11-Iran (trying to out-macho Daddy Bush, I guess). Brilliant. So we’ve wasted lives and a fortune setting up the mess we’re in now. And Cheney thinks he has an expert’s view of the war in Afghanistan? He helped to screw up all chance of our coming out of this well and he opted out of patriotic action during the war being waged when he was young. How many deferrals did he get to avoid fighting in Viet Nam? He should blush every time he plays patriot.

Posted by: Cassandra | October 22, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

“Nice article.Great to see honest reporting at ABC.”
_______________________________
Let’s see about that ‘honesty’ in reporting.
McKiernan – appointment to command ISAF troops in Afghanistan in June 2008.
Since June 2008, McKiernan’s troop requests (to the Bush administration) add up to roughly 30,000 more troops, a combination of combat units and support troops.
“President Bush sent . . . 6,800 troops – months and months after the requests had come in.”
Okay, there is the truth . . . since June 2008 McKiernan requested 30,000 troops. Bush sends 6,800 troops – as Tapper puts it – “months and months after the requests had come in” . ..
Seems pretty clear.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Jake,
I am unashamedly a conservative.I don’t believe that you are.Yet,I appreciate your reporting. It is fair and I thank you for that.Keep up the good work.

Posted by: C.S.Skudlarek | October 22, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Figures, Cheney is BS’ing us again.

Posted by: Jim Bob | October 22, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Obama – like a divorcee who claims innocence 24 x 7! I had nothing to do with it – it was all his/her fault!

Posted by: Michael W | October 22, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

I can almost hear the stirring words of Winston Churchill:
“We shall go on to the end, even though I inherited this mess from my predecessor;
we shall fight in France,
we shall fight on the seas and oceans,
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, and even though my predecessor should have done a lot more,
we shall fight on the beaches,
we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight in the hills;
we shall never surrender, but if my predecessor had done a better job I might not even have to consider surrender as an option”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 22, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

my cat died it must be G Bushes fault

Posted by: Russ | October 22, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

“Obama – like a divorcee who claims innocence 24 x 7! I had nothing to do with it – it was all his/her fault!”
___________________________________
More like a divorcee who – when faced with his ex-partner shrieking to media “it’s his fault, it’s his fault’ – responds with some information to counteract the shrieking.
Cheney should crawl off into his hole. He has no moral ground after abandoning Afghanistan to launch a highly questionable attack on Iraq, after a highly questionable propaganda campaign to gain public support.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

It’s refreshing to see some logical thought in the mainstream media (coming from tapper)… and it’s also very very rare occurrence! Cheney always was straitforward and logical.

Posted by: bob s | October 22, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

GWB rightly tried and waited for NATO to really come on board as he was pretty busy with a surge in Iraq that was still going on and being more and more successful. If Afghanistan was the place to be, how come NATO did not step up to the plate. GWB knew there was a deficit in troops, but hell, Europe would suffer more from a Taliban/Al Q victory than the US.

Posted by: mad dog | October 22, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

“Throughout most of 2008, the Bush administration tried (?)to get NATO countries to fill that gap, though they had to have known (?) that would be a challenge. By the late summer, 2008 Bush administration officials realized NATO wasn’t going to come through.”
Hey Jake, can we get a fact check on these little gems? I know you’re still smarting from your last press conference smackdown, but you’re gonna have to try a little harder to not look like the petulant child you are.

Posted by: jeanettejaz | October 22, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

“GWB knew there was a deficit in troops, but hell, Europe would suffer more from a Taliban/Al Q victory than the US.”
__________________________________
Again, the deficit in moral ground to start attacking the current President.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Jake,
Petulant you are, along with its associated displays of insecurity and bullying. Why ABC News tolerates your biases on their programming dime is beyond me. What does George S have to say about your behavior and reporting? Is he proud of you? I would doubt it very much.

Posted by: Ren from Baltimore | October 22, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

What’s the matter Ren? Can’t stand it if your boys are seen as perfect? An idiot would have to know Cheney is talking out of both sides of his mouth on this one.

Posted by: secondlook | October 22, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

“Europe would suffer more from a Taliban/Al Q victory than the US. ” Interesting but wasn’t it ‘Al Q’ that attacked us on 9/11?? If they were the threat to the U.S., what was Bush doing in Iraq in the first place?
Oh, I remember, WMD’s. Or was it that he was cleaning up after Dad?

Posted by: Jeff | October 22, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

“Bring on 2012″ Don’t be in a rush, he’s just going to win another term. Republican voters will be down to 10% of total voters by then.

Posted by: Jeff | October 22, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Almost a year since elected, and they STILL blame everything on Bush….its no wonder people do not take responsibility for their actions when the highest office in the land doesnt either!

Posted by: angus | October 22, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Jake Tapper, I appreciate your journalism!!! Thank you for standing up for the sake of the telling the truth.

Posted by: luvg-d | October 22, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

From the time McKiernan made his requestuntil Bush left office, how many GI’s were killed? How many since Obama took over?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 22, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Notice how the other major point made in Cheney’s speech is being “overlooked”?
Rahm Emmanuel said that Obama had to “start from scratch” on Afghanistan because the Bush administration had developed no strategy.
Cheney said that’s a total falsehood. He said in his speech the Bush administration did develop an extensive study of and strategy for the war in Afghanistan and handed it over during the Obama transition.
So one of them’s lying.
Of course, there will always be those who will never believe one side or the other no matter what the proof. Then there are the rest of , the majority, who would believe proof, no matter who it favored.

Posted by: MizFW | October 22, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Another story by the Obama news network (ABC) trying to blame Bush for Obama’s failures. Obama hasn’t doen ANYTHING since he’s been in office except give lip service.

Posted by: bo | October 22, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

The bush White House is the single most horrific thing to infect this nation in my lifetime. I have little doubt of the amateurish findings that have been uncovered and I have little doubt that we will learn of so much more. Unfortunately I also have little doubt that President Obama has the backbone to unleash the prosecution that SHOULD be set upon the bush officials who infested the White house for 8 long and horrific years.

Posted by: NoWarmongers | October 22, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Why doesnt Cheney just disappear…….He and his daughter are doing us no good as a country.

Posted by: Jay | October 22, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

“Cheney said . . . the Bush administration did develop an extensive study of and strategy for the war in Afghanistan and handed it over during the Obama transition.”
__________________________________
You’re leaving out a small fact here – Cheney said the Bush administration IN THE FALL OF 2008 “dug into every aspect of Afghanistan policy” assembling a team that reviewed all options and recommendations – IN THE FALL OF 2008.
So, they sat on Afghanistan for 7 years and then – just in time to lose their grip on power – put together a plan.
Sorry folks, it doesn’t cut it.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Unless your question is just rhetorical , why don’t you simply ask Bush and Cheney. Unlike the Obama child those two have the guts to give you an honest answer.

Posted by: rplat | October 22, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Quick, somebody ask Cheney why we’re even still in a war after 8 years. Add to that a second one.

Posted by: secondlook | October 22, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

“Quick, somebody ask Cheney why we’re even still in a war after 8 years. Add to that a second one.”
_________________________________
Exactly, Bush and Cheney had the two wars for 8 years and couldn’t end them – and now the right wing thinks Obama is supposed to fix it all in 9 months.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Gibbs says this administration is creating and saving jobs yet the numbers don’t lie. 15 million unemployed and many more to come.
He’s a habitual liar and more lies to come. How can anyone trust him? I was punked into voting for this den of clowns, but now it’s too late. Mr. hesitant President, send the damn troops and quit campaigning. The election is over and you stand a better chance of winning the mega lottery than getting another term.

Posted by: david p | October 22, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

“Exactly, Bush and Cheney had the two wars for 8 years and couldn’t end them – and now the right wing thinks Obama is supposed to fix it all in 9 months.”………. No, they don’t think Obama is supposed to fix their mess. They’re just looking to stir up more garbage. What blows my mind is anybody buying it.

Posted by: secondlook | October 22, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Hey david, do you understand the concept of nobody has a crystal ball in the WH and the best they can do is “predict” what will play out in a nasty recession? If somebody could pull jobs magically out their backside we’d never have a recession. It all remains to be seen.

Posted by: secondlook | October 22, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Obama has done nothing?Look,I dont like the guy,BUT,You cant be serious..Look at the stock market. Look at the housing numbers.Cash for Clunkers? Tax credits for first time home buyers? Hes done more for the people who keep this country running, (the working class) Than ANY Bush,Jeb included!

Posted by: oregonIndy | October 22, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Mr. Obama has been President for 10 months and was elected almost one year ago. Yet he continues to blame Bush and can’t seem to develop a policy of his own. How about President Obama doing SOMETHING! Failing to act while placing blame on his predecessor is getting old.

Posted by: John M | October 22, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

someone who is doddering shouldn’t be pointing fingers about dithering..This would have been a moot discussion if cheney had kept his trigger happy fingers off the afganistan war and let us finish it..instead of authoring his own “crusade” to Iraq…imagine if we had just polished off the taliban and alqeda in afganistan…how many of our soldiers would still be alive and not dead or severely wounded…if we wanted to listened to his advice we wouldn’t have kicked his ass out-please try to fade into obscurity-where is the “nuance” Jake?????

Posted by: cowgirl | October 22, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

“It’s a bit more nuanced”, Jake says. Let’s look at the Bush-Cheney record on this concept. Bush to Biden pre-Iraq invasion, JOE, WE DON’T DO NUANCE. Please don’t wrap Cheney in that defense.

Posted by: B. Bear | October 22, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

someone fire up the microwave and put an end to cheneys monolog…get the hook out and jerk him offstage…as he doesn’t seem to realise …ITS OVER for you Mr. Cheney…you blew it!!!

Posted by: cowgirl | October 22, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Now Jake can you fact check that lie ridden mess of a speech Cheney gave? Nah , didn’t think so. Media always misses the damn story. The story is not Gibbs, but the fact that an incompetent in regard to war and a draft dodging liar, has the audacity to call anyone afraid.

Posted by: gail | October 22, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Leadership is taking charge and dealing with the hand you’re dealt…not whining about it. Imagine if President Lincoln would have sat around and cried about inheriting slavery rather than leading the country out of it…Obama is a complete joke, Cheney farts more leadership than Obama will ever have. God help us!

Posted by: Tom | October 22, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Leadership is taking charge and dealing with the hand you’re dealt…not whining about it. Imagine if President Lincoln would have sat around and cried about inheriting slavery rather than leading the country out of it…Obama is a complete joke, Cheney farts more leadership than Obama will ever have. God help us!
Posted by: Tom | Oct 22, 2009 11:17:35 PM……….. I’m sorry but you must be mistake about who started this little fight here. I believe it’s a very rude former VP that thinks he can still call the shots after his term is over. After HE blew it too I might add.

Posted by: secondlook | October 22, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Leadership: Someone who gets drunk and shots their hunting partner in the face with a shotgun…in my kneck of the woods..thats called a “moron”

Posted by: cowgirl | October 22, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

No one at ABC seems to think it important that Scooter, “convicted liar”, Libby also was warmly received at the Cheney gala with his own award.
He did have the decency to look a little embarrased. Even Rummie showed up. No mention of that either. You neo-con folks should note that before accusing ABC of being left-wing.

Posted by: B. Bear | October 22, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Just the lib media trying to devert attention from Obamo while he lingers on the request to send more troops or not, just pull them out if it takes this long for monkey ears to make up his mind. Bush has been out of office for nearly a year, yet the Pres. and the mdia morons keep bring back something that doesn’t matter now because they can’t be responsible for their own action. Typical brown nosed media freaks.

Posted by: bill | October 22, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Jake-He asked for 30,000 and got 6,000- so Gibbs is not accurate? How about not sending enough troops for 7 years of Bush Admin after 9/11?
Stop being an cheerleader for the Bush administration, or just follow John Stossel to Fox News where you would feel more comfortable doing so!

Posted by: Fred | October 22, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Why doesn’t the Obama Admin. release the open records of the meeting with CEO of 7+ banks that involve his key people back in 2008? Talk about transparency? What transparency, there has been more law suits filed against this Admin. for open records that any Admin. in history, and we are only 10 months into the current Admin. One other question, Why doesn’t Obama want to release the White House visitor log since he has been office? Tranparency my rear end…..

Posted by: rukidding 55 | October 22, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

admit it… everything that we told you was going to happen happened. this guy spent more than anyone, took over indust(ries), constantly apologizes for our hard work, and WILL raise taxes with cap n trade as well as the bush cuts repeal, look it up it will have an impact on you. this admin. is a joke. face it. largest pole drop in 50 years. tele sales boy will be gone in 2012 and thank goodness!

Posted by: stickman | October 22, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

The best argument for you libs would be citing Obama’s leadership and accomplishments…it speaks volumes that you can only go back to your typical sniveling school yard nonsense about Bush/Cheney…how can you clowns look yourselves in the mirror is beyond me.

Posted by: Tom | October 22, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

“everything that we told you was going to happen happened. this guy spent more than anyone”
____________________________________
There was a $1.2 Trillion dollar deficit left on the table for 2009 BEFORE Obama was even sworn in.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Tom, does Fox pay to rent your brain or did you just give it to them? How embarrassing it must be to still be defending the worst Administration in history by trying to deflect responsibility from the Bush/Cheney cut-and-run strategy in Afghanistan. How utterly embarrassing…

Posted by: Reality Check | October 22, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

President Obama promised during the election to make U.S. military aid to Pakistan conditional on anti-terror efforts – he has done that and we are seeing the results in Pakistan right now.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

dither: to act nervously or indecisively : vacillate, the very definition of the 7 years of the 8 year war in afganistan…Afganistan has our presidents full attention, unlike the previous administration, oh yes he does have to spend sometime on our collapsing economy and health care crisis, which occurred on the cheney bush watch, lets see as I recall -they were dithering in Iraq….while all else burned

Posted by: cowgirl | October 22, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Nice attempt at spin Tapper. If I didn’t know better I’d think you worked for FOX

Posted by: dan | October 22, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

“There was a $1.2 Trillion dollar deficit left on the table for 2009 BEFORE Obama was even sworn in.”
False. The $787 billion stimulus is entirely Obama’s doing, as is the cost of the two automotive bailouts.
Obama is giving us an average deficit of $900 billion for each of the next ten years. He owns them, and it’s yet another thing that he can’t blame on Bush. But it’s in his nature to try, because he is a moral coward.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 22, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Well Tom, on his second day he passed the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Like he said he would. He’ll pass some form of health care reform. Like he said he would. He will be opening the WH visitor logs – which nobody past has done. They’re working on Gitmo – only come to find out they had no files on the people being held. Soon he’ll sign the Matthew Shepherd hate crime legislation. I’m sure there are many other policy changes he’s done. And last but not least? Putting out about a million fires, swatting republican fussy flies off constantly, and trying to run two wars. Now, if you’d like to completely judge a president in the future on what they manage to do in 8 months? I’m sure we can return the favor on the next guy on your side.

Posted by: secondlook | October 22, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

“How about not sending enough troops for 7 years of Bush Admin after 9/11?”
We sent enough for Nancy Pelosi to declare the war over in April, 2005. And Americans weren’t dying at the rate of forty per month.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 22, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

“as is the cost of the two automotive bailouts.”
_________________________________
Nonsense, Chrysler and GM both received bail-outs before Obama was inaugurated.

Posted by: julieterra | October 22, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Well, I agree that NATO even some other countries should share some military support fight against terror. I, American are tired of world look us as world police and fingerpoint us of something wrong. If we send huge number of soldier much soon then it will hurt our budget so bad due to very expensive logical support as we may need some extra for future problem. So Obama should start share work load and send some instead of blame on Bush. We want catch Bin Laden for attack NY Twin even want destroy Tabian problem. I remembered Bill too chick to said Yes to firing missile attack Bin Laden so Is Obama too chick?

Posted by: snow | October 23, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am

“We sent enough for Nancy Pelosi to declare the war over in April, 2005. And Americans weren’t dying at the rate of forty per month.”
_____________________________________
I didn’t see Pelosi under any “Mission Accomplished’ banner primping for the cameras.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am

love it. Cheney has no credibility. That we have two wars still waging is a testement to how badly they were run for 8 years. They Cheney show is over. WE saw it played out for 8 years. It left us with a crumbled economy, two wars gone bad, and huge debt for NOTHING. Bush and Cheney didn’t fix the banks, or bail out an automaker saving hundreds of thousands of jobs. What DID Bush and Cheney do for their billions spent???? we KNOW what Obama did and yeah, I think i’d rather save teh economy than kill the economy trying to save the debt, which, if the economy died, yeah, we’d have no debt, but we’d also have no banks and 40% unemployed so realy wasn’t a great deal Bush and Cheney left us with. That he thinks he’s an authority on anything other than running your country and your military in the ground is amazing. I think that’s why they did so poorly. Delusional.

Posted by: seriously | October 23, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am

actually, no, we DID have debt, walking into this thing we had debt, from Cheney and bush. We should not have, but we did,and it’s a real mystery what their Trillions went toward.

Posted by: seriously | October 23, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am

“I didn’t see Pelosi under any “Mission Accomplished’ banner primping for the cameras.”
Had you been paying attention you’d have seen her primping for the cameras in the Capitol building telling reporters that the War in Afghanistan was over. Let me know if you want me to drag out the quote yet again.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 23, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Now Jake can you fact check that lie ridden mess of a speech Cheney gave? —BINGO!!!! Tell me, why the scrutiny only on Obama? Anyone getting sick of this? Bush got a wash for everything. And no scrutiny. Bush never did a thing when congressional hearings for predatorial lending practices. Never lifted a finger “let the bad banks fail” – he causes this meltdown – no scrutiny. But then the media puts a microscope on anything Obama does. Amazing. Cheney and Bush running the wars into theground ,no scrutiny. Obama is just assessing a situation and everyone is down his throat. Dear Lord, let the man breath! He has done so well with so much HUGE stuff that everyone just gave Bush a pass for. LEAVE HIM ALONE for a minute and half, huh? And Dear lord, of all the people to play judge…cheney!!!! LOL!! Are you kidding me?????? THis is ridiculous!

Posted by: Where was all the interest back then | October 23, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Now Jake can you fact check that lie ridden mess of a speech Cheney gave? —BINGO!!!! Tell me, why the scrutiny only on Obama? Anyone getting sick of this? Bush got a wash for everything. And no scrutiny. Bush never did a thing when congressional hearings for predatorial lending practices. Never lifted a finger “let the bad banks fail” – he causes this meltdown – no scrutiny. But then the media puts a microscope on anything Obama does. Amazing. Cheney and Bush running the wars into theground ,no scrutiny. Obama is just assessing a situation and everyone is down his throat. Dear Lord, let the man breath! He has done so well with so much HUGE stuff that everyone just gave Bush a pass for. LEAVE HIM ALONE for a minute and half, huh? And Dear lord, of all the people to play judge…cheney!!!! LOL!! Are you kidding me?????? THis is ridiculous!

Posted by: Where was all the interest back then | October 23, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Obama has worked quite hard. You’ll remember Bush had already taken 3 weeks holidays at his ranch by September of his first year (2001) and returned to Washington in time to be caught completely off guard by 9/11.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

“So, they sat on Afghanistan for 7 years…”
Again, see Pelosi, N., April 2005. She thought it was over. By that time not a single Democrat had called for more troops.
If you want to re-invent history to your liking, bear in mind that there is a public record out there that won’t go away.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 23, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

“Again, see Pelosi, N., April 2005. She thought it was over. By that time not a single Democrat had called for more troops.”
______________________________________
Democrats were a minority in both houses and the Republicans held the Presidency, the Congress and the Senate in 2005.
Quite trying to shift blame from where it belongs.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

The most telling thing here is McKiernan’s quote: “There was a saying when I got there: If you’re in Iraq and you need something, you ask for it. If you’re in Afghanistan and you need it, you figure out how to do without it.”
Afghanistan was the ugly stepchild of the Bush/Cheney regime. They were utterly focused and resourcing Iraq as Afghanistan drifted. We were told Bin Laden was dead, then alive, then mortally wounded… Bottom line: Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda and their hosts the Taliban were never finished off when we had them on the ropes. 7 years later, they’ve regrouped and are even more of a threat. Thanks for nothing Darth the Ditherer!

Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

“While resources were directed to Iraq by that administration, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were steadily regrouping in Afghanistan (and of course across the border in Pakistan).”
No they weren’t. Al Qaeda was not in Afghanistan at all; it went in great numbers into Iraq and was defeated there in detail. As you may recall, in Pakistan there came a drastic change in regime when Musharraf was ousted, and in any event neither Bush nor Obama has ventured to send any other than special ops forces and drones into Pakistan.
If Afghanistan was being “neglected” for 7 1/2 years, why did Nancy Pelosi think the war there was over in 2005? Why didn’t she say it was being neglected?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Wow – an almost truthful article from ABCNEWS on the Bush Administration that doesn’t bash it, or hide facts! I am impressed. My son was part of the Marine MOR that went over in that request last year, and they kicked *ss… so part of what you should also include is that after 3 – 4 months of the Marines slaughtering the enemy in South Afghanistan, the need for additional troops at that point in time was reduced. What should also be said is that when the election approached in late last year, when Bush made it clear that he would defer to the NEXT President – whomever that may be – to make the decisions even prior to entering the WH – that all focus on Afghanistan was dropped, troops stopped going over, units were brought home – and pretty much all of the turf our force won in the summer – was taken back by the Taliban – thus requiring the original troop request needs to continue on. Had we stayed and maintained – rather than left and then shown a VERY WEAK face to the enemy, we wouldn’t need as many troops as we now need to go win it back again.!
Oh – and you should also have mentioned that Congress (DEM Controlled) started cutting the budgets/not approving them for the troop increases back home for recruitment, so enlistment was severely impacted until the noose was loosened. You can only feed troop requests, if Congress approves the $$.
Other than that – pretty good piece. A

Posted by: clr | October 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

“The automotive bailouts were done under OBAMA’S “regime”
________________________________________
12/19/08 8:22 AM EST
“President George W. Bush stepped in Friday to keep America’s auto industry afloat, announcing a $17.4 billion bailout for GM and Chrysler, with the terms of the loans requiring that the firms radically restructure and show they can become profitable soon.”

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Leadership? where were bush and cheney during the 911 crisis? Bush was hiding behind a childrens book and then hidden in an airplane, and cheney was hiding in a bunker below the white house, while thousands of americans were dying…how long did it take them to come out of hiding and address their fellow country men? Is that your definition of leadership? They were and are cowards of the first order.

Posted by: cowgirl | October 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

“On December 19, 2008, President Bush used his executive authority to declare that TARP funds may be spent on any program he personally deems necessary to avert the financial crisis, and declared Section 102 to be nonbinding. This has allowed President Bush to extend the use of TARP funds to support the auto industry.”

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I thought we loaned money to auto makers. Not gave them a bail out.

Posted by: secondlook | October 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

I think most of you are just lost. Most everyone is not happy with how the Bush years ended…. But WOW, listen to you defend this guy we call pres. I would not trust this guy cooking my burger at mcd’s. He never did anything and it shows. He has a completely super leftie agenda and that much is obvious. I don’t care if it’s super left or super right…. It’s super wrong. It has become painfully clear this racist professor defending, Franlin Davis mentored, Rev Wright following, Bill Ayers apologist, USA hating, communist czar having, overated, overhyped, never had a job socialist is doing no good! Calling bond holders speculators. Your grandma may own GM or Chrysler bonds. The only speculators I see are you crazy and uninformed folk that still follow this bad idea called Obama. Get over it. Just because you blame Bush for everything from burning the chili to being satan himself does NOT give this whatever he is the right to change 200+ years of hard work trying to make things better. He is not god. He is a man. A man with no history of the qualifications to be pres. It shows admit it.

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

“Most everyone is not happy with how the Bush years ended…. ”
__________________________________
It is unfair to compare President Obama with President Bush because Bush and the Cheney regime were such a disaster.
Obama has worked quite hard. You’ll remember Bush had already taken 3 weeks holidays at his ranch by September of his first year (2001) and returned to Washington in time to be caught completely off guard by 9/11.
Strange that the tired old right can’t seem to get past buzz words and speaking points that are so thin they STILL are including ‘Ayers’ and Wright’ – old news by any standards, and VERY dubious when it was first used.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

“old news” “real news” what’s the dif right? None of those guys (and MANY unmentioned) mean anything. Remeber when Barry said….”Judge me by the people who surround me”? I guess I shouldn’t take his word for much then huh?

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Obama has worked quite hard. You’ll remember Bush had already taken 3 weeks holidays at his ranch by September of his first year (2001) and returned to Washington in time to be caught completely off guard by 9/11.
Oh your right again, I guess family trips around the world technically don’t count as “vacation”. Score one more for you.
Tell me though…. You said “Obama has worked quite hard”….
At what? Saying he’s sorry? Spending money? Appointing communist czars? which one?

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

‘Ayers’ and Wright’ are old news by any standards – same as George Bush’s business failures and combined use of cocaine and alcohol.
Still the right wing has so little legitimacy and material, it continues to pull out those two names.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

” I guess family trips around the world technically don’t count as “vacation”.
_____________________________________
The President was on official business which you know quite well. The children were on school vacation and their trips were paid for by the family.
Again, you’re grasping at straws and making your arguments look pretty thin and phony.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

See julie, what you don’t get is I never voted for bush. HE spent to much, HE handled the war poorly, HE along with Carter and Clinton moved the CRA right along. None of that was good either. However, you have complete blinders on. It’s like your team is 1-3 and you are betting your life savings on your team winning the super bowl. He is not your team….. I am, we are.. not Barry or Bush see? I get it BUSH WAS BAD. Why are you so willing for this guy to be worse?

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Name three things good ol Barry has done you are not happy with? Can you?

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Come on play devil’s advocate. You can do it….. If you have to you can cut and paste what I said.

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am

” I guess family trips around the world technically don’t count as “vacation”.
____________________________________
You cannot make weak, slanted arguments like this and then expect people to think you have accurately assessed the situation – nor expect people to respect your judgement or your opinion.
That’s the problem stick.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Defense Secretary Gates, initially appointed by Bush “said the strategy Obama laid out for Afghanistan in March was the FIRST real strategy America has had in Afghanistan since the ’80s.”
That is a remarkable statement. Think about it. Bush and Cheney never developed a strategy for Afghanistan! And it shows and Obama is addressing that now.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 23, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

McKiernan’s Bush-era troop requests were not “met with the urgency Cheney has suddenly decided President Obama must meet, lest he be seen as ‘dithering?’”
Obfuscation poses as analysis and investigation! It’s MCCRYSTAL, not just CHENEY, who’s saying that the troops must be sent promptly or Afghanistan will likely be “mission failure” … and Petraeus is pretty much agreeing with McCrystal (although in more diplomatic terms)! Making decisions promptly to use resources in Iraq rather than Afghanistan (as the Bush people did) is NOT the same as deferring decisions (as Obama ADMITS he is is doing). In other words, making a decision someone else doesn’t like is not the same as refusing to decide because one is afraid someone else might not like what one decides. Bush may or may not have made bad decisions, but Obama is definitely dithering.
Further, McKiernan’s Bush-era requests didn’t carry urgency comparable to McCrystal’s because the situation in Afghanistan has only more recently deteriorated. Indeed, the relative quiet and apparent US success in Afghanistan allowed candidate Obama to chirp that Afghanistan was a “war of necessity” on what he mistakenly believed to be a “no political cost” basis. He’s chirping a different tune now.

Posted by: Ken McKenna | October 23, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Official business? Who are you Bobby Gibbs?
(Obamas Head to Paris for Family Vacation)Originally posted Friday June 05, 2009 10:25 AM EDT
People Mag.
Wild!

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Things will come to pass on the AFPAK situation and the Health Care Thing that will demoralize all the hard core supporters of the president… I seriously doubt you will show up for the mid terms… the dirty little secret is that there wotn be relief for the middle class there will be taxes on health care etc etc IM no conservative there hasnt been anythign accomplished yet

Posted by: JG | October 23, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

President Obama begins vacation on Martha’s Vineyard with round of golf
BY David Saltonstall
DAILY NEWS SENIOR CORRESPONDENT
Monday, August 24th 2009, 6:40 PM
“Official Business”

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am

WASHINGTON — The top military commander in Afghanistan is asking for up to 80,000 more American troops even as he warns that rampant government corruption there may prevent victory against the Taliban and al-Qaida, according to U.S. officials briefed on his conclusions.
Even with additional troops, McChrystal concluded that corruption still could let terrorists turn Afghanistan back into a haven, according to officials at the Pentagon and White House.
_________________________________
So the White House is correct in weighing the situation – given McChrystal’s own assessment.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Maybe this source is better…. Sorry!
Sept. 8, 2009 CBS news.
Obama Girls : How They Spent The Summer
Bo Obama’s Busy White House Dog Days
(AP) If Malia and Sasha Obama write “How I Spent My Summer Vacation” essays as they head back to school this week, oh, the stories they can tell.
“The tweens have prowled the Kremlin in trench coats, roamed a Harry Potter movie set in London, and studied slave history in Africa as they racked up tens of thousands of miles crisscrossing the Atlantic Ocean, time zones and international borders with their parents this summer”.

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Am I getting anywhere yet? Do you see that both parties stink, and it just so happens that this guy, who came after the worst guy, is even worse? Maybe? Can you even consider it?

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

“Am I getting anywhere yet? Do you see that both parties stink, and it just so happens that this guy, who came after the worst guy, is even worse? Maybe? Can you even consider it?”
__________________________________
I’m not convinced about the Republicans yet. Tell me why they stink.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Sarcasm huh? Well it’s bedtime for me. I hope you take a closer look at what’s happening and realize it’s not all BUSH BUSH BUSH. Maybe….. just maybe…. Barry isn’t perfect. Maybe there were some serious problems….. Maybe he makes them worse. All I ask is you consider it like I did Bush 1&2, Clinton, Carter, all the way back. Remember he works for us. Is this what you signed up for?

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am

president bush sent the troops he could spare because iraq was his priority. right or wrong that was his choice. the war their has been pretty much won and troops have been available to shift for months. thus the charge of dithering. President obama needs to make a decision quickly and it needs to be correct. that is why he was voted in to office.

Posted by: GB | October 23, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am

The best argument for you libs would be citing Obama’s leadership and accomplishments…it speaks volumes that you can only go back to your typical sniveling school yard nonsense about Bush/Cheney…how can you clowns look yourselves in the mirror is beyond me.
Posted by: Tom | Oct 22, 2009 11:42:11 PM
***
And how you can project the clown and school yard nonsense thing onto others is beyond me, but whatever. Not everyone possesses self awareness.
I do get sick and tired of the whole accomplishment thing. Things aren’t nearly as dire as you’d like to think–
Since his inauguration the President has removed barriers to responsible scientific research involving human stem cells, signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, signed legislation expanding children’s health care (SCHIP), established the White House Council on Women and Girls, pushed for enactment of the Matthew Shepard Act, which expands hate crime law– and he’s about to sign the bill, doubled the troops in Afghanistan and ordered an assessment as part of a thorough policy review pertaining to the war in Afghanistan, secured $5 billion in aid commitments for Pakistan “to bolster the country’s economy and help it fight terror and Islamic radicalism” within the country, engaged the Muslim world in a manner wholly underappreciated by right wingers but important nonetheless, led a meeting of U.N. Security Council heads of state, a first for a U.S. president, which resulted in the adoption of a resolution focused on stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, signed the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (the largest conservation effort in 15 yrs), put into place the framework for an auto industry recovery including an allocation of $2 billion in stimulus cash for advanced batteries systems, singed U.N. convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, signed credit card bill of rights, put $75 billion toward helping homeowners mostly via TARP funds, banned lobbyist gifts to exec branch employees, singed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act which dedicates funds to alternative energy research, highway projects, and Health IT, the stimulus bill and Obama’s first budget dedicates money to high-speed rail, the Attorney General has directed federal prosecutors Monday to back away from pursuing cases against medical marijuana patients, signaling a broad policy shift that drug reform advocates interpret as the first step toward legalization of the drug, President Obama also signed the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act into law today, the Dow is UP; the Nasdaq is UP ; in May, U.S. home prices rose for the first time in THREE YEARS; in June, new home sales rose 11% and as we move into the last quarter of 2009, home sales figures have risen on average all over the nation meaning there are signs of recovery; Health Care Reform likely with some sort of “public option” will become law before year’s end. Regulatory reform on Wall Street will take awhile and it’ll be a slug fest, but that’s going to happen too. While some feel it’s not happening fast enough, the administration is sticking to the status of forces agreements with Iraq to pull out our forces on time, and while we may not meet the deadline, Gitmo will be closed and no longer serve as a recruitment tool for those who wish to destroy us; and the world views America more positively again. World opinion has noticeably gone back up. And while transparency may not be where we want it to be, this admin is the most transparent to date. Not perfect, not even good enough *yet* but a few steps in the right direction.
Oh, and as hopesprings52 pointed out Defense Secretary Gates, initially appointed by Bush “said the strategy Obama laid out for Afghanistan in March was the FIRST real strategy America has had in Afghanistan since the ’80s.”
He also has said he very much enjoys working with Obama, but that’s neither here nor there, I suppose — the point is the President is also the first to develop a real strategy for Afghanistan which I hinted at but didn’t spell out. It may be taking him longer than you’d like (though you’d likely complain no matter what) but somehow I doubt it will be simply about “muddling through.”

Posted by: Olivia | October 23, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

well done Olivia

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

tiredgirlie – Sorry to say (NOT), but Clinton should’ve paid more attention to HIS intelligence advice regarding Al Queda, as was identified in the 9/11 Commission Report.
BOTH parties had their eyes off the target… and “We the People” paid, and are paying, the price.

Posted by: Fed_up_with_BOTH_Parties | October 23, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am

julieterra – I disagree. We DO have the resources to FIGHT two, even three or four wars. What we DON’T have the resources for is to languish while the politicos in Washington try to “politic” their way into office, and then “politic” their way through the wars we’ve engaged in.
The war in Iraq IS over; what we’re doing there now is NOT what we went in there for.
The war in Afghanistan COULD be over, but we’ve refused to give the commander’s (and their troops) on the ground the resources they need to close the deal.
Yeah, we CAN fight MULTIPLE wars on MULTIPLE fronts, but we have to have the right LEADERSHIP in the position of the Commander-In-Chief of the US Armed Forces.
Sadly, Obama is FAR WORSE than the previous Administration in THAT respect.

Posted by: Fed_up_with_BOTH_Parties | October 23, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Please don’t force me to do this, I am tired: The fact is I don’t agree with half the “accomplishments” you bring up. SCHIP is designed around the worst income levels and will become just as bad a medicare part d
” engaged the Muslim world in a manner wholly underappreciated by right wingers but important nonetheless”
I am proud of my country I am sorry you are not STOP apologizing.
“led a meeting of U.N. Security Council heads of state, a first for a U.S. president, which resulted in the adoption of a resolution focused on stopping the spread of nuclear weapons”
The U.N. is a scam, we know that from every administration regardless of party. Nuclear weapons? Get real!
“Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (the largest conservation effort in 15 yrs), put into place the framework for an auto industry recovery including an allocation of $2 billion in stimulus cash for advanced batteries systems,”
“singed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act which dedicates funds to alternative energy research, highway projects, and Health IT, the stimulus bill and Obama’s first budget dedicates money to high-speed rail”
Really? these are good things? The stimulis programs are a joke at best. Even the Dems are starting to come out and admit that.
” the Dow is UP; the Nasdaq is UP ; in May, U.S. home prices rose for the first time in THREE YEARS; in June, new home sales rose 11% and as we move into the last quarter of 2009, home sales figures have risen on average all over the nation meaning there are signs of recovery”
Recovery? Where do you live? Markets are up? What levels did you invest at?
“Health Care Reform likely with some sort of “public option” will become law before year’s end. Regulatory reform on Wall Street will take awhile and it’ll be a slug fest, but that’s going to happen too.”
This is the obvious joke, Reform? No. Government healthcare? Yes. Mandating pay via czar? Yes. Show me in the constitution where any of this is warranted. Please.
“Gitmo will be closed and no longer serve as a recruitment tool for those who wish to destroy us; and the world views America more positively again.”
Obama is the recruitment tool. Play nice he says. He is the weakest of any Pres in history. I guess the views of the world have changed so much those guys we keep catching that want to blow us up in our own country just have a bad attitude.
Sorry for any errors but there was a whole lot of B.S. to sort through and had to be quick. Goodnight all.

Posted by: stickman | October 23, 2009, 2:11 am 2:11 am

“Yeah, we CAN fight MULTIPLE wars on MULTIPLE fronts, but we have to have the right LEADERSHIP in the position of the Commander-In-Chief of the US Armed Forces.”
___________________________________
I’m tired of financing the military/industrial complex. Iraq was an unnecessary war.
How much money do you want to pay out for these wars?

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 2:12 am 2:12 am

“The fact is I don’t agree with half the “accomplishments” you bring up.”
_______________________________________
That’s good, that means you agree with half of the accomplishments – that’s quite a lot.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Markets are up? What levels did you invest at?
___________________________________
stick you’ve got to do some real research. Stay away from your People magasine ‘facts’

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 2:17 am 2:17 am

Mr. Tapper and Mr. Martinez,
During the relevant period, did the U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan tell President Bush they were afraid they would lose the war if they didn’t get the requested troops? I don’t think so.

Posted by: DRJ | October 23, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am

“During the relevant period, did the U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan tell President Bush they were afraid they would lose the war if they didn’t get the requested troops?”
_____________________________________
Seven years under Bush and Cheney and they still hadn’t won the war.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Obama, Rahm, Gibbs, Axelrod, they are all such despicable Chicago punks.
The sooner we are rid of this criminal gang, the better.
2010 they can be made lame ducks. 2012 they can be kicked to the curb.
They have denigrated the office since day one.

Posted by: Mike | October 23, 2009, 3:47 am 3:47 am

listening to Cheney whine is pathetic, if he and Bush had accomplished as much as he implies, he wouldn’t need to try so desperately hard to justify his 8 years, and he wouldn’t have to send his shrill daughter out to lie for him.
the proof is the state of the country at the end of the Bush/Cheney years… a disaster at best, and at worst, criminal negligence and malfeasance that demands investigation and trial.

Posted by: Oh Yeah | October 23, 2009, 3:56 am 3:56 am

“Mr. Tapper and Mr. Martinez,
During the relevant period, did the U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan tell President Bush they were afraid they would lose the war if they didn’t get the requested troops? I don’t think so.”
This pretty much says it all… And this was years after we entered Afghan. They understood not to even bother asking because Chaney & his fellow neo-cons got it so wrong by diverted the war effort to another country rather than finishing the job in Afghan. where Al Queda was based.

Posted by: jk | October 23, 2009, 4:00 am 4:00 am

In his first interview after being fired by Defense Secretary Gates over the summer, McKiernan told the Washington Post about his appointment to command ISAF troops in Afghanistan in June 2008: “There was a saying when I got there: If you’re in Iraq and you need something, you ask for it. If you’re in Afghanistan and you need it, you figure out how to do without it.”

Posted by: jk | October 23, 2009, 4:02 am 4:02 am

The situation in Iraq evolved towards rapid (too rapid) troop reductions, so Obogus has resources to play with that Bush and Cheney did not.
Simple arithmetic seems to be beyond journalists and other liberals. “Nuance” not required. Or useful.

Posted by: Brian H | October 23, 2009, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Throughout most of 2008, the Bush administration tried to get NATO countries to fill that gap, though they had to have known that would be a challenge. By the late summer, 2008 Bush administration officials realized NATO wasn’t going to come through.
—————————
Despite that the Afgan war is an international problem and is such acknowledge by the NATO countries, NATO’s contribution to this war, except for the USA, is lousy. After all, why should the other countries go to all of the trouble and put their troops in harm’s way when we are willing to do it for them?

Posted by: Beto | October 23, 2009, 4:25 am 4:25 am

What I find “nuanced” is less Gibb’s statement than it is this article’s take on it. I find it disheartening that the reporters never simply and clearly give the facts about the conflicting claims: What was the maximum number of additional troops requested by McKiernan during the Spring of ’08, and about what month was this maximum request forwarded? If close to 40,000 troops were requested approximately 8 months before the Bush administration approved it, then Gibb’s statement is true. If not, it is false. The “why” the troops were or were not moved is moot; both administrations would have plenty of reasons to not rush to send more troops overseas. Though very important, IT I NOT THE STORY. What needs to be resolved in this case is this: if Gibb’s statement is true, either both administrations “dithered” or they both had good reaon to “wait,” making Cheney’s statement disingenuous. On the other hand, if Gibb’s statment is not anywhere near true, then we should consider electing a new president.
Dear Mr. Tapper and Mr. Martinez: C’mon guys! Get your game on!

Posted by: Joe | October 23, 2009, 4:50 am 4:50 am

Obama can only sing one tune: “It’s Bush’s fault.”

Posted by: John Kantor | October 23, 2009, 4:52 am 4:52 am

Oops. I had better “get my game on” too. Of course I should have written “IT IS NOT THE STORY,” instead of “IT I NOT…”
Sorry guys.

Posted by: Joe | October 23, 2009, 4:54 am 4:54 am

get a life gibbsy, tell barry to grow up, accept responsibility and make some tuff decisions- its wahts called serving as our president

Posted by: realman1963 | October 23, 2009, 5:13 am 5:13 am

The 21,000 troops being sent are not combat troops as MyCrystal requested.
Obama ran on the motto “Bush undersourced the war in Afghanistan”. Leaving 8 troops to be slaughtered in an undermanned and remote outpost means Obama is undermanning Afghanistan.
More troops have died in Afghanistan in the year Obama has been in office than in the prior 7 years combined.

Posted by: karen | October 23, 2009, 5:41 am 5:41 am

It was obvious that the focus wasn’t on Afghanistan and NATO wasn’t going to pick to slack for America, after all the rest of the world knew that this war was a sham. Bush sat on his hands from the very beginning; remember when he was being told we were being attached he just kept reading a children’s book. Then after 911 he let the friends and family of the Bin Laden’s go and gave Bin Laden a 4 month head start, all while trying to put blame on Iraq. Obama is no better, he renewed the Patriot Act and is now expanding the War even though the President of Afghanistan was recently quoted as saying there are no Al qadia in his country. Yet all you pro war people say remember 911. Well I remember how we left all the rescue workers down by denying their claims for serious health problems sustained from the dust of 911 and any moneys that were allocated ran out in 08. America is disgrace. It amazes me how many people still believe this is a war about catching the perpetrators of 911 and it’s not, 14 of the hijackers were Saudi’s and later on we found out that a Pakistani Military Commander wire transferred money to one of the 911 hijackers. Also Bush had prior knowledge of the 911 plot many months before it all went down. There is this video on U Tube that explains all lot about who is behind the curtain or the scenes pulling all the strings to rope us into WW3, its called Zeit-geist. The only terrorist are US citizens and politicians that believe were at war to fight people who want to harm us and that is just stupid. Americans are the terrorist of the world!

Posted by: louie | October 23, 2009, 6:03 am 6:03 am

The same people who are complaining about Bush letting the request sit on his desk.. were probably yelling about the war..at the time.. it’s easy to criticize the sitting President.. and guess what lefties ‘It’s our turn to criticize!!’….

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | October 23, 2009, 6:08 am 6:08 am

I am so sick of this administration acting like a bunch of elementary & middle school kids. “He did it too!” “Well, he did this” “I don’t like xyz so I won’t play with him/her”. It’s time for them to GROW UP. (And Cheney needs to keep his mouth shut – it isn’t right for someone who was in his position to criticize the new administration. Even though he’s been right about someone else, it’s not his place to say so. People not elected need to bring these things up).

Posted by: ellsbells930 | October 23, 2009, 6:36 am 6:36 am

Stickman said “Name three things good ol Barry has done you are not happy with?” ooh – I can!!!!
1. Going around the world “apologizing” for us. We don’t need to apologize to anyone.
2. Pushing this health care “reform”
3. Taking over the auto companies.
4. Thinking he has the right to determine salaries in a non-government company.
5. Pushing ‘cap and trade’
That’s 5 right off the top of my head – without even thinking about it. I’m sure I could come up with 5 more given another couple of minutes.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | October 23, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Obama had made a decision,he simply refuses to announce it until after the November elections. Until then the talking point is “prudent” and “deliberative”. Just ask Jooooohhhhhnnnnn Kerry!

Posted by: pauldia | October 23, 2009, 6:45 am 6:45 am

Has anyone ever calculated how much it would’ve cost to put up a terrorist fence around all of the lower 48 to protect us from terrorism vs. fighting terrorist wars on their home turf? At least at home, we have some control of the ground on which we stand and our airspace and could have a much better chance of fending off attacks. I’m beginning to conclude that Afghanistan is another Vietnam. We can never win there.

Posted by: Rob | October 23, 2009, 6:49 am 6:49 am

“Throughout most of 2008, the Bush administration tried to get NATO countries to fill that gap”
…which is one thing that Liberals were beating Bush over the head with. They insisted that our allies needed to contribute more; it shouldn’t be just our own men dying. It was part of John Kerry’s infamous “Global Test.”

Posted by: I'm Not a President, but I Play One on TV | October 23, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 29% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-eight percent (38%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -9.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 23, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

listening to Emanual and Axelrod whine is pathetic, if they and Obama are accomplishing as much as they say, they wouldn’t need to try so desperately hard to justify his 9 months in office, and Obama wouldn’t have to send his shrill advisors out to lie for him.
the proof is the state of the country at the end of the Obama, Emanual, Axelrod years…so far, it’s looking like a disaster at best, and at worst, criminal negligence and malfeasance that demands investigation and trial….
jc

Posted by: joe cassidy | October 23, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

“… the Constitution allows for many things, but what it does not allow is the most revealing. The so-called Founders did not allow for economic freedom. While political freedom is supposedly a cornerstone of the document, the distribution of wealth is not even mentioned. While many believed that the new Constitution gave them liberty, it instead fitted them with the shackles of hypocrisy.”
–Barack Hussein Obama, Columbia thesis
*sigh*

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 23, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Being a President looked pretty easy, didn’t it obama? How does it feel now that you are under scrutiny from a rival political party and even your own? You think you can do a better job than any previous President? PROVE IT NOW!

Posted by: Jenny | October 23, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Stickman also said “Please don’t force me to do this, I am tired: The fact is I don’t agree with half the “accomplishments” you bring up… I am proud of my country I am sorry you are not STOP apologizing.
Poor Stickman. You kinda remind me of my grandfather who claims to be independent now after watching Glen Beck– and yet, he’s as partisan and conservative as they come. You definitely sound conservative. To me that’s an outdated ideology, especially economically.
As for the patriot, love of country allegation– it cracks me up that a certain breed of so-called patriots are wholly in favor of policies that have nearly destroyed the ideals and economy of our country. For many of us who weren’t alive when Carter was president and barely remember Reagan, being proud of your country doesn’t require being close-minded, scared of change or people with exotic names or unwilling to acknowledge that America isn’t perfect. I’m proud of my country, and one thing I’m very proud of is that we were able to self-correct after making a HUGE mistake– we elected President Obama after getting stuck with Bush in 2000(despite the fact that he didn’t win the popular vote) and then (gulp) re-electing him (shame on us, though I wasn’t responsible for the debacle.)
Anyway, my investments are modest, but my mom invests and is doing well. She gives me tips and stuff so I know the Dow and Nasdaq are up and that she’s been making money. The recovery will take time, and I wish the stimulus had been larger and more focused on jobs, and even more focused on energy, but they did some great things with the money– things that will make a difference for my generation. And I’m hopeful that a jobs bill is coming (cue the conservative shrill)
The main reason I came back on here this morning is I forgot to mention an accomplishment– David Brooks has an op-ed in the NYT today about education reform.
As for something I don’t like that Obama has done, the number one thing is his efforts toward bipartisanship. Republicans don’t understand that sort of thing so it’s been a colossal waste of time and effort. I also wish he’d move toward repealing DADT and doing away with DOMA very, very soon. And I wanted a single payer health care system. But, overall, I’m glad we’ve moved out of the dark ages.
Baby steps.
I’m off to work but carry on with the wild rumpus…

Posted by: Olivia | October 23, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

“At some point, you own your presidency. At some point it’s your rubble. At some point the American people tell you it’s yours. The polls now, with the presidential approval numbers going down and the disapproval numbers going up: That’s the American people telling him.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 23, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

George S.-smart move this morning to have Anne colter on to support the republican side…what a hoot, don’t they have smart women in the republican party? Oh thats right, shes one of those nut cases on the fringe (of reality) susan collins and Snowe are mainstream….apparently colters fan club resides on trappers site…no one hear subscribes to reality and the truth

Posted by: cowgirl | October 23, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 29% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-eight percent (38%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -9.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Oct 23, 2009 9:43:03 AM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Looks like the President must be doing something right the past 3 days. The entire set of Rasmussen data is listed below.
Looks like major movement from Strongly Disapprove to Strongly Approve.
1) Strongly Disapprove down 2%
2) Strongly Approve up 2%
3) Somewhat Disapprove down 1%
4) Somewhat Approve unchanged
4) Total Approve up 2%
5) Total Disapprove down 3%
Date—Somewhat Approve / Somewhat Disapprove—Strongly Approve / Strongly Disapprove—Total Approve / Total Disapprove
23-Oct-09—-20% / 12%—-29% / 38%—-49% / 50%
22-Oct-09—-21% / 13%—-26% / 39%—-47% / 52%
21-Oct-09—-20% / 13%—-27% / 40%—-47% / 53%
Change——- 0% / -1%—–2% / -2%——2% / -3%

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 23, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

The White House is like a bunch of little kids whining, “But they didn`t do it either.” or “Don`t look at me I didn`t start it”.
We do not want a President that whines and points fingers, we want a President that knows and accepts what job he is getting into and fixes things and makes things better.
If Obama can`t do that, then resign.

Posted by: Shirley | October 23, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

“More troops have died in Afghanistan in the year Obama has been in office than in the prior 7 years combined.
Posted by: karen | Oct 23, 2009 5:41:07 AM
_____________________________________
Nonsense. Why this need from the anti-Obama types to lie or fail to do any credible research?
Voice of America
22 September 2009
“More than 200 American troops killed so far this year. That is 25 percent of all the U.S. military deaths in Afghanistan since the war began.”

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Presidential Job Approval
54/39 Gallup
49/50 Rasmussen Reports
50/46 USA Today/Gallup
55/43 CNN/Opinion Research
57/40 ABC News/Wash Post
49/45 FOX News
53/41 Marist
52.4%/43.4% RCP Average*
*Don’t be fooled by imitators. This is the most current REAL RealClearPolitics Obama Job Approval average.

Posted by: Numeros | October 23, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

SNL used to do a skit called “Doug and Wendy Whiner.” It appears that those characters have gone to work for the Obama Administration.

Posted by: Steve | October 23, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

The White House is not ‘whining’, it’s defending itself against the partisan political attacks from the last (shamed)Vice-President.
Retired General Paul Eaton, senior adviser to the National Security Network:
“The record is clear: ex-VP Cheney and the Bush administration were incompetent war fighters. They ignored Afghanistan for 7 years with a crude approach to counter-insurgency warfare best illustrated by: 1. Deny it. 2. Ignore it. 3. Bomb it. While our intelligence agencies called the region the greatest threat to America, the Bush White House under-resourced our military efforts, shifted attention to Iraq, and failed to bring to justice the masterminds of September 11.
“The only time Cheney and his cabal of foreign policy ‘experts’ have anything to say is when they feel compelled to protect this failed legacy. While President Obama is tasked with cleaning up the considerable mess they left behind, they continue to defend torture or rewrite a legacy of indifference on Afghanistan. Simply put, Mr. Cheney sees history throughout extremely myopic and partisan eyes.”

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see how the fact that Bush delayed troops to Afghanistan makes it okay for Obama to delay. Wasn’t Obama very critical of they way Bush failed to prosecute the war in Afghanistan during the campaign? Didn’t Oama say Afghanistan was the necessary war, and appoint McChrystal to take over and determine what needed to be done to win the war, and all the talk about how he was going to get in there and do what needed to be done in Afghanistan. Now, yes, he DITHERS, and more boys die because they are not getting the support they need. Either get the necessary troops over there to win this thing, or get the heck out of there! Stop wasting lives!

Posted by: mbs | October 23, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Thank you for cutting through the spin to report to us exactly what happened. Keep it up.
Now more than ever, we rely on you to give us an honest accounting of those who are in power.
(And, although I sent it other ways, I’ll say it here: Thanks to your decision-makers for standing up/against Obama’s attempt to censor Fox from the television pool for the Pay Czar segment yesterday. I fear it won’t be the last important choice you folks have to make to preserve free discourse. All the best.)

Posted by: Carol | October 23, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Obama is like a 5 year old with his “but he did it first” response to EVERYTHING….
Never takes ownership, constantly fibs..
I raised kids and I’m telling ya, this one would have been slapped and put in time out long ago…. sick of it..

Posted by: mjishernameo | October 23, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Posted by: mjishernameo | Oct 23, 2009 3:04:00 PM
The White House is not acting like a child, it’s defending itself against the hack partisan political attacks from the last (shamed) Vice-President.
Retired General Paul Eaton, senior adviser to the National Security Network:
“The record is clear: ex-VP Cheney and the Bush administration were incompetent war fighters. They ignored Afghanistan for 7 years with a crude approach to counter-insurgency warfare best illustrated by: 1. Deny it. 2. Ignore it. 3. Bomb it. While our intelligence agencies called the region the greatest threat to America, the Bush White House under-resourced our military efforts, shifted attention to Iraq, and failed to bring to justice the masterminds of September 11.
“The only time Cheney and his cabal of foreign policy ‘experts’ have anything to say is when they feel compelled to protect this failed legacy. While President Obama is tasked with cleaning up the considerable mess they left behind, they continue to defend torture or rewrite a legacy of indifference on Afghanistan. Simply put, Mr. Cheney sees history throughout extremely myopic and partisan eyes.”

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Interesting to note today’s daily job approval changes:
Approve: up 2 points at Rasmussen, up 3 points at Gallup.
Disapprove: down 3 points at Rasmussen, down 2 points at Gallup.
Did Cheney’s “dithering” comments end up backfiring on him? Who knows, but it’s food for thought.

Posted by: Numeros | October 23, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

WHY ARE YOU STILL ON THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION? FOR GOD SAKES ITS ALMOST A YEAR. WHEN CAN THEY LET GO. CHRIS WALLACE (FOX NEWS) THEY ARE THE BIGGEST WHINERS WE HAVE EVER SEEN IN THE WHITE HOUSE. AND THE MSM PLAYS ALONG

Posted by: karen | October 23, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

“Interesting to note today’s daily job approval changes:
Approve: up 2 points at Rasmussen, up 3 points at Gallup.
Disapprove: down 3 points at Rasmussen, down 2 points at Gallup.”
_______________________________________
Interesting, and that guy on here who is always pushing Rasmussen’s polls hasn’t mentioned this?
I guess it’s clear he’s just pushing his own personal political agenda regardless of the facts.

Posted by: julieterra | October 23, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Neo-cons shrilly decry Obama’s “blaming” Bush-Cheney for our problems. Fine, but under their standard the responsiblity for 9/11 falls squarely in their lap..not Bill Clinton’s.

Posted by: B. Bear | October 23, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

I am a DEM but I do believe the OBAMA WH lied on this issue. The former ADM laid out the plan for the then candidate OBAMA and HE AGREED ON THE PLAN, BUT ASKING THE BUSH AD. NOT TO SPEAK OUT.
Now they acted like they didn’t know anything about the AFH. WAR. No, Obama should act like a president, not like a dirty chicago politican who played dirty tricks.
After 20 years of support of the DEM PARTY, I swiched to INDEPENDENT. I disagree with the OBAMA POLICIES a lot. This is not a race issue, it is disagreement on policies. (I am minority immigrant from a communist country 25 years ago where we had no FREEDOM OF SPEECH and it was horrible when you lost it !!!)

Posted by: gee | October 23, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

I admire JAKE TAPPER !
Long live FREEDOM OF SPEECH !

Posted by: gee | October 23, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Leadership is taking charge and dealing with the hand you’re dealt…not whining about it. Imagine if President Lincoln would have sat around and cried about inheriting slavery rather than leading the country out of it…Obama is a complete joke, Cheney farts more leadership than Obama will ever have. God help us!

Posted by: Tom | October 23, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Posted by: gee | Oct 23, 2009 4:36:14 PM
Whatever Cheney says now, if you do even a shred of research you won’t exactly get the sense that the Bushies were grabbing the bull by the horns on Afghanistan. Period. You might want to read the statement from National Security Network Senior Adviser Gen. Paul Eaton (Ret.), who served more than 30 years in the United States Army and from 2003-2004 oversaw the training of the Iraqi military. It’s been posted on a couple threads here and you can google it. In fact, see julieterra’s post at {Posted by: julieterra | Oct 23, 2009 2:01:28 PM}
Personally, I think Gibbs was spot on.
And just for the record, nobody’s freedom of speech has been jeopardized. Nobody has been censored. Somehow I doubt you’re from a communist country as you claim. It seems like it’s just part of a schtick. Truth of the matter is because of freedom of speech, we all have the right to use our filters and common sense, and label Faux News as we see fit. I see it as propaganda and total crapola. It makes me feel good that the admin hasn’t been duped into thinking that FNC has integrity or balance or truth on its side. It’s a bent news organization. Nobody has tried to stop them from doing their bent thing, and it’s not like smart people didn’t already think Fox News fans were gullible and less intelligent than, say, Jon Stewart or Colbert Report fans.

Posted by: GwenTenn | October 23, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Is that it libs? The same old tired and whiney blame Bush crap? Please, tell me you can do better…You could easily win the argument by citing Obama’s leadership and accomplishments, so go ahead and lay it on me…….crickets chirping……nuff said!
Checkmate!

Posted by: Tom | October 23, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

“Interesting to note today’s daily job approval changes:
Approve: up 2 points at Rasmussen, up 3 points at Gallup.
Disapprove: down 3 points at Rasmussen, down 2 points at Gallup.”
_______________________________________
Interesting, and that guy on here who is always pushing Rasmussen’s polls hasn’t mentioned this?
I guess it’s clear he’s just pushing his own personal political agenda regardless of the facts.
Posted by: julieterra | Oct 23, 2009 3:31:14 PM
Oops, I just noticed the Rasmussen Disapproval rate is down 2 points, not 3. Thought I’d better correct my mistake before “that guy” jumps all over it.

Posted by: Numeros | October 23, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Only fools like Bush/Cheney rush in without obtaining all of the pertinent facts. They rushed us into the Iraqi war from which Iraq and this country will probably never recover. Obama should take the time to make sure that Afghanistan has a stable government in place before sending anymore of our troops there.

Posted by: johnnylee | October 23, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Lather rinse repeat, Tom. Talk about the “same old tired and whiney crap.” See Olivia’s post from last night: Posted by: Olivia | Oct 23, 2009 1:40:57 AM
She added education reform (see David Brook’s oped in NYT today.)

Posted by: GwenTenn | October 23, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

How is it whining to highlight Cheney is a hypocrite?
And Faux News is not really a news organization but a policy spewing arm of the far right. It is is one thing to criticize our government, journalists should do that, based on facts. But news organizations do not try to organize people against the government as Fox News has repeatedly. That is acting as a political organization.

Posted by: Lydia | October 24, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Hey Steve.
Obama’s Approval Rating matches Reagans to a T for the same number of days in office.
psst.
Real Clear Politics is a GOP front website.

Posted by: aDCBeast | November 25, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Jake Tapper,
Your logic skills need some work.
as you reported, Bush43 let a request for 30K troops sit on his desk.
“So as McKiernan’s outstanding requests for more forces accumulated throughout 2008 to roughly 30,000 soldiers, President Bush sent at least 6,800 troops – months and months after the requests had come in.”
What about “ACCUMULATED” from your own words don’t you understand ?

Posted by: aDCBeast | November 25, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.