Health Insurance Air War Begins
The insurance industry declared war on the President's health care efforts on Sunday. Now the bombing’s begun. ABC’s Teddy Davis has the details: The insurance industry is now on the air in multiple states attacking Democratic health reform proposals as bad for seniors, according to an independent ad tracker. The ad does not focus on yesterday’s methodologically questionable report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Instead, it focuses on the impact to seniors of proposed cuts to Medicare Advantage. “Is it right to ask 10 million seniors on Medicare Advantage for more than their fair share?” asks the ad’s narrator. “Congress is proposing more than $100 billion in cuts to Medicare Advantage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says many seniors will see cuts in benefits.” Democrats have targeted Medicare Advantage for cuts because the private insurance companies which administer the program receive 14 percent more per patient than traditional Medicare. The insurance industry is correct, however, in claiming that seniors on Medicare Advantage receive various extra benefits such as vision, hearing, and dental in addition to certain cost-sharing arrangements not available under traditional Medicare. Independent experts say that seniors on the Medicare Advantage program could lose some of those benefits, or face higher premiums, if the government reduces payments to insurers. Evan Tracey, the head of the independent Campaign Media Analysis Group, the ad tracker which observed the insurance industry’s new spot, says the ad signals that there may be another “big wallet” coming into the television ad war over health care reform. “Anything they have done before this Medicare Advantage spot was more or less cheerleading health care reform,” said Tracey whose firm has detected the ad on the air in Colorado, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania. As seen in the embedded video, the ad is also airing in Missouri. Up until Sunday, when the ad started running, President Obama and congressional Democrats had succeeded in keeping the insurance industry at the bargaining table with the promise of tens of millions of new customers. The insurance industry grew nervous, however, that the Finance bill does not do enough to bring healthy young people into insurance risk pools. Although the Finance bill which was approved earlier today includes a requirement that all adults carry insurance, members of the Finance Committee adopted an amendment during mark-up by Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., which postpones and reduces penalties on people who do not comply with the individual mandate. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the number of legal nonelderly residents with insurance coverage would rise from 83 percent now to 94 percent over the next decade under the Finance bill. Karen Ignagni, the chief lobbyist for the insurance industry, said Monday that insurers cannot afford to stop discriminating on the basis of pre-existing conditions if participation rates do not get into the “high 90s”. While Democratic strategists would prefer it if the insurance industry were still on the sidelines, Democrats are hoping that the insurance industry’s 11th hour decision to fight reform and issue a skewed report will succeed in rallying Democrats behind President Obama’s top domestic priority, including, possibly, some version of a government insurance option. UPDATE: Ad Airing in Six States A source familiar with the insurance industry’s ad buy confirms that the Medicare Advantage spot is airing in six states: Louisiana, Colorado, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania. The states were selected to target the constituents of Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., and Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
One can’t help but think that any industry with so much extra cash on hand to sponsor studies, send out legions of lobbyists, mount media blitzes and fill the coffers of congressmen… is making too much. How about putting that cash to work to lower premiums and give decent coverage to average Americans?
Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 13, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
From the Center for Responsive Politics
Senator Mitch McConnell:
1) $ 2 million in political campaign contributions from the health sector
2) Kindred Health Care, Humana Inc, Blue Cross, and GalaxoSmithKline.
Charles Grassley:
1) Blue Cross, Select Medical Group, and Amgen.
Mike Enzi:
1) Blue Cross, Amgen, Merck & Co, and Goldman Sachs.
Senator Olympia Snowe:
1) $ 360,000 from the health sector
2) Aetna Inc., Spectrum Medical, and Goldman Sachs.
Senator Richard Lugar:
1) $ 177,000 in political campaign contributions from the health sector
2) Eli Lilly Pharmaceuticals and Blue Cross/Blue Shield
Orrin Hatch:
1) $ 977,000 from health care sector
2) Blue Cross, Amgen, Eli Lilly Kindred Health Care
Jim DeMint:
1) Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Cancer centers for the Carolinas, and the United Health Group.
Isn’t it interesting that we are being forced to make political campaign contributions through our Health Insurance Premiums?
And, that those contributions are helping our rates to go up!
What a country!
Posted by: ErnestNM | October 13, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
hopesprings52: kinda makes you think that insurance companies aren’t too big to fail! They are running scared, as they should be! I’ll give them as much sympathy as they’ve given us.
Posted by: jks | October 13, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Proponents of Health care reform must now raise our voices so that the people we hired, work to do our will and not that of the Health care insurance companies. The insurance companies will ratchet up the volume to keep the status quo.
Posted by: Young Utah | October 13, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
say goodbye to decent health care. i will pay a fine of 700 a year and get insurance when i am sick. that beats 16000 a year any day. if you cant beat them or join them and milk the system like everyone will. what a joke.
Posted by: catman | October 13, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
You lie tv ad voice over person. There’s not a complete bill signed into law yet.
Posted by: noorman11 | October 13, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
How can you live saying “help your neighbor” and not walking the walk. I think the complete phrase is: “help your neighbor, but not with my taxes”
Have a nice day.
Posted by: Salvia | October 13, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
If you are getting close to or are retired medicare advantage plans do a whole lot more than regular medicare Obama says you get the same from regular medicare, again [YOU LIE].
Posted by: earl | October 14, 2009, 7:10 am 7:10 am
What comes first? Our mortgagae payment or our health insurance payment? will this cause more home forclosures?
Posted by: txapples | October 14, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
SIngle payer will be included in the health care bill and it will be passed. President Obama and others were elected partly to reform health care. The president is being too quiet on reform issues. He’s letting every one have their say. Now that the naysayers have hung themselves, he will introduce single payer as part of healthcare reform. Watch and see!
Posted by: jks | October 14, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Welfare,Food Stamps,Government housing,Earned Income Tax Credit and now Free Health Care.Why would anyone want to work? What a country.
Posted by: Johnny L | October 14, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
The Advantage plan with Medicare was introduced by the republicans……..without being paid for…..it was only designed to pay more to the Private, profit driven insurance industry…..before this clause was enacted by the Republicans, Medicare prescription care was good enough….didn’t hear complaints from Seniors then….MEDICARE WAS MADE LAW BY A DEMOCRAT, REMEMBER!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: sara | October 14, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, wants to include a version of a government option called a co-op owned by insured members. What a wonderful idea says Mike Oliphant whom manages Utah health insurance plans for http://www.benefitsmanager.net/utah-group-health-insurance.htm . This may encourage competition from private health insurance carriers. But I fear it will fail ultimately if there is no TORT reform because the same liability costs that plague medical professionals and health insurance carriers will be like a fast cancer growth within the co-op plan. A government option wouldn’t allow legal suite against the plan but will with medical providers. Doesn’t anyone see that we need TORT reform to protect the cost outcome? See what Utah has done with health care reform
Posted by: Mike | October 14, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm