More on the Success of Predators in Pakistan
Following up on our post yesterday looking into the improved success of Predator strikes against al Qaeda and Taliban forces in Pakistan, I spoke to a couple senior administration officials who added to the conversation.
While not confirming the numbers from the unofficial Long War Journal analysis indicating more al Qaeda and Taliban have been killed in 2009 than in 2007 and 2008 combined, a senior administration official says, "I wouldn’t dispute that there have been more senior as well as mid-level operatives from al Qaeda as well as affiliated groups killed."
Are there more drones in the region than there were before President Obama took office?
"There's an enhanced capability," the official said, "an increased capability."
A senior US counterterrorism official confirms for ABC News that "al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups have lost some of their top leaders over the past year. It’s clear they’re feeling the pinch. Our understanding of these groups continues to grow. That’s a good thing for us and a very bad thing for our terrorist enemies.”
Somewhat wryly — the Predator attacks are seldom discussed publicly — the senior administration official said, "whoever’s dropping these things, theyre being quite successful."
The administration official said the improved success was "partly a result of the maturing of the capabiliies, a maturing of the intelligence," and an improvement in "the cooperation that exists out there as a result of recognition among different elements of the US and the Pakistani governments of a shared concerned and interest in eleimating some of these individuals and groups."
As a Pentagon official told us yesterday – pointing to US counterinsurgency forces in Afghanistan and Pakistani forces on the other side of the border – the administration official agreed there has been a "successful squeeze" of those in the border region, leading to better intelligence, though he said "I don’t want to point to any single element, there's been a lot of pressure being applied leading to opportunities that are being seized upon, and also leading to a lot of mistakes by the enemy."
Some in the Pentagon who support Gen. Stanley McChrystal's push for up to 40,000 more troops for a more aggressive counterinsurgency effort in Afghanistan fear that some White House officials are so pleased with the success of the Predator strikes they are likely to support Vice President Biden's push for a narrower counterterrorism strategy, without considering that counterinsurgency efforts are part of recent successes in Pakistan.
Does the senior administration official think counterterrorism would be the right focus given the success of the Predator program? He was non-committal.
"You're trying to do certain objectives that are very sutiable for certain instruments of power," he said. "We want to make asure we understand what out goals are, what our objectives are, and apply our capabilities accordingly. I don’t think anybody believes individual programs or capabilities are going to be sufficient to deal with the array of challenges out there," including "kinetic strikes, military training of Afghan forces, economic development."
"Al Qaeda needs to be destroyed," the administration official said. "It needs to be destroyed as an organization, as a means of inspiration, as an infection of other peoples and groups. Whether its in the Fatah region, or in Afghanistan or whether it's in other places in the world. It is their goal to destoy; they are bent on the destruction of innocents."
Significantly, the administration official said "as we talk about other groups, such as the Afghan Taliban, there may be different types of strategies to be employed. But in terms of al Qaeda — which is a transnational phenomenon which has infected that theater — they're not redeemable."
The following senior terrorist figures have died within the past year or so:
* Khalid Habib (veteran combat leader and operations chief involved with plots to attack the West; deputy to Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri, al-Qaeda’s #3);
* Rashid Rauf (mastermind of the 2006 transatlantic airliner plot);
* Abu Khabab al-Masri (al Qaeda’s most seasoned explosives expert and trainer, and the man responsible for its chemical and biological weapons efforts);
* Abdallah Azzam (senior aide to Sheikh Sa’id al-Masri);
* Abu al-Hassan al-Rimi (led cross-border operations against Coalition forces in Afghanistan);
* Abu Sulaiman al-Jaziri (senior external operations planner and facilitator);
* Abu Jihad al-Masri (senior operational planner and propagandist);
* Usama al-Kini (Marriott attack planner and listed on the FBI’s terrorist most wanted list);
* Sheikh Ahmed Salim Swedan (involved in the attacks on the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania;
* Abu Sulaiman al-Jaziri (senior trainer and external operations plotter);
* Baitullah Mehsud (leader of the Pakistani Taliban);
* Yahyo (leader of the Islamic Jihad Union);
* Ilyas Kashmiri (senior al Qaeda operations planner).
Note: it’s not a typo that two Abu Sulaiman al-Jaziris are on the list. There were two, and now there are not.
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Re: Unnamed Sources
Jake, you may want to take note of this report:
The New York Times reports today White House officials told congressional leaders they opposed the legislation pending in the Senate Judiciary Committee that would shield reporters from jail time for failing to reveal sources. The Times cites “several people involved with the negotiations.”
It adds that the administration sent to Congress “sweeping revisions” to the bill that “would significantly weaken its protections against forcing reporters to testify.”
Posted by: SjB | October 2, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
A Promise made by Obama.
Posted by: Thinking | October 2, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
What happened? Tic….tic….tic…..I’m not hearing anything! Usually, this is bombarded with wingers. Where are you? In all seriousness, you can but applaud this effort. Obviously no one should cry for joy with respect to killing humans, but these are far closer to savages than they are humans. I always wonder why they hide from being killed when they claim they will be rewarded in Heaven. Doesn’t everybody want to go to Heaven? And if they hate us that much, why would they want to kill us knowing we might go to Heaven? You see, it all makes no sense whatsoever. If only the youths being indoctrinated would be able to ponder these questions.
Posted by: David | October 2, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
the ‘right’ only cares about nonsense,
success in Afghanistan, foiling terrorist plots here in America mean nothing to them, health care for millions…. meaningless to the ‘right’..
hate and fear are their stated policies and goals
Posted by: TnT | October 2, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
I’m against this war for the first time.. and predators can’t fight the war.. it is a prelude to aggression on both sides..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | October 2, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Looks like the prelude to set up the American citizens for a pull-out in Afghanistan. Lots of public smoke to make such a major military decision, Stunningly public. It just gets curiouser and curiouser.
Posted by: SjB | October 2, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
The irony of course is that the admin that has no problem launching missiles from afar that kill not only the terrorist targeted, but anyone else in the immediate vicinity (which I don’t have a problem with) is the same one that is looking into prosecuting CIA officers who used aggressive interrogation tactics approved by their bosses to gain intelligence as opposed to just killing them without getting any information out of them. Seems like common sense is missing in all of this.
Posted by: Jason | October 2, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
aggressive interrogation tactics approved by their bosses Posted by: Jason
it’s called torture, it’s illegal, and it wasn’t necessary to get information
Posted by: YO | October 3, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Just a point of clarification in the article.
The article lists ‘Fatah,’ when it should have been FATA.
‘Fatah’ is the militant group in Israel/Palestine. FATA means ‘Federally Administered Tribal Area’ in Pakistan.
Posted by: HH | October 6, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm