By Lindsey Ellerson

Oct 9, 2009 12:22pm

Obama “Surprised” and “Deeply Humbled” by Nobel Peace Prize

ABC News’ David Wright, Yunji de Nies and Sunlen Miller report:


“Well this is not how I expected to woke up this morning,” the president said off the bat, remarking that just five hours before his press secretary woke him to tell him the news that he had won the Nobel Peace Prize.


“I am both surprised and deeply humbled by the decision of the Nobel Committee. Let me be clear, I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations.”

President Obama acknowledged that he doesn’t feel that he deserves to be in the company of those who have won this prize in years past.


“To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize, men and women who’ve inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace.”


The president said that throughout history the award has “has not just been used to honor specific achievement; it’s also been used as a means to give momentum to a set of causes.”


Obama said this is why he will accept this award, “as a call to action, a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century.”


Using the opportunity to outline his global agenda – the president reiterated his desire for a world without nuclear weapons, for all countries to take responsibility for climate change, and to pursue a new beginning among people of different faiths, races, and religions based on mutual respect, and a commitment to realize the right of all Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security.


“And even as we strive to seek a world in which conflicts are resolved peacefully and prosperity is widely shared, we have to confront the world as we know it today. I am the commander in chief of a country that’s responsible for ending a war and working in another theater to confront a ruthless adversary that directly threatens the American people and our allies. I’m also aware that we are dealing with the impact of a global economic crisis that has left millions of Americans looking for work.  These are concerns that I confront every day on behalf of the American people.”


The president said that some of the work confronting the administration will not be completed during his presidency – some, like nuclear weapons will “not be completed in my lifetime,” he said.


“But I know these challenges can be met, so long as it’s recognized that they will not be met by one person or one nation alone.  This award is not simply about the efforts of my administration; it’s about the courageous efforts of people around the world. “


The president opened with a funny – and lighthearted – anecdote from this morning in which his two daughters, and the Presidential dog, put the news of his win in perspective.


“After I received the news, Malia walked in and said, “Daddy, you won the Nobel Peace Prize, and it is Bo’s birthday.” And then Sasha added, “Plus, we have a three-day weekend coming up.” So it’s — it’s good to have kids to keep things in perspective.”


The president will travel to Oslo, Norway, in December to accept the award.


-David Wright, Yunji de Nies, and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

The Politico:
“President Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize is quickly turning from a singular honor into a gold-medal headache, as even supporters call it premature and critics say it proves he’s a darling of the international elite.”
forcing young, healthy people to buy health insurance…slashing Medicare Advantage for the elderly poor..tripling the previous record deficit…but the Darling of the International Elite!
Has a nice ring to it.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 9, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

I have to admit that was Obama’s best attempt to actually sound humble.
If we hadn’t already heard a million times how “it’s not about me”.
Must have taken every bit of inner strength to not talk about his historic climb to the presidency. No need for TOTUS–he’s got that life story memorized and so do we.

Posted by: pami | October 9, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

If Obama could only claim that he fought for the rights of the Iranian people dying in the streets for freedom.
Or fought for the people of Honduras.
Obama has done nothing really except make empty promises. If anything he has sided with the dictators instead of the people.

Posted by: ollie | October 9, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

“forcing young, healthy people to buy health insurance”
I am surprised a conservative would suggest that young people should not prepare themselves for eventualities dealing with medical care.
I guess if Obama said something about water being wet, the right would insist that was in fact dry.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 9, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Obama thought his star power and charm could win him the Olympics.
Turns out it won him the Nobel Prize.
That and an apology tour.
The Nobel will forever be diminished by giving it to Obama or anyone that has so little achievements.

Posted by: larry | October 9, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

“forcing young, healthy people to buy health insurance…”
Fascist Hyena | Oct 9, 2009 12:41:20 PM
Excellent. So when they show up in the ER with a broken leg, take up weeks in the ICU from a motorcycle spill, or need very expensive treatment for testicular cancer (a young, healthy man’s disease – just ask Lance Armstrong), society won’t have to pay for it.
The choices are:
1. Making everyone contribute to insurance.
2. Letting free loaders sop off those who so contribute via the ERs.
3. Letting foolish young adults literally die from treatable illness and injuries. (The public will still have to pay for the disposal of bodies simply as a matter of public health.)
Those are the ONLY three options. Which one do you prefer, 2 or 3? Do you have any base to your bumpersticker opinion?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 9, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

This really shows how the “peace prize” is a joke, even more than when Arafat won it. This character Obama has done nothing yet (well nothing for peace and not much for good.)
Where will he give the money or will he line his own pockets? For example: he could give the money earned from his “peace prize” to the families of soldiers killed, to displaced people in Iraq/Afghanistan, the families of civilians killed by drones in Pakistan, to people wrongfully detained in secret prisons or Gitmo, or to the crime-ridden impoverished people in his hometown of Chicago.

Posted by: Ed | October 9, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

“To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize, men and women who’ve inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace.”
Didn’t Al Gore win this? Barry I agree but don’t sell yourself short.

Posted by: 'Un-Amercican' | October 9, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

“I guess if Obama said something about water being wet, the right would insist that was in fact dry.”
Ryan C | Oct 9, 2009 12:50:48 PM
You have to admire how Obama has magically turned Republicans into zealous defenders of Medicare. Republicans now insist that Medicare program does not have a cent of waste to trim and demand that it continue without change or evolution forever. Just a little while ago they were insisting it was on the road to bankruptcy and before that it was a socialist imposition.
That’s magic.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 9, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

If young people do not get health insurance you will be the first to complain about the cost. The only way to reduce the health care expenses is to see that everyone has coverage. You know that but refuse to accept it. I want the public option as I have dealt with insurance companies and the only way to keep they under wraps is to have choice. They are a business making 400% in profits these last years and they don’t care about you or your health. Any company that drops people and gives a bonus should be condemned. That is what Obama is trying to get fixed so open your minds for a change and realize what is going on.

Posted by: talmag | October 9, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

He’s got the Humble act down like Uriah Heep.

Posted by: mesquito | October 9, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Nobel Peace Prize for 2009
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.
Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama’s initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.
Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population.
For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world’s leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama’s appeal that “Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.”
Oslo, October 9, 2009

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

The Nobel committee is consistent. They always give this award to people who hate America.

Posted by: drjohn | October 9, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Me thinks the European Liberals are getting worried about Obama’s poll numbers in American…Even Obama is “surprised” with this award………

Posted by: Parallex View | October 9, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

apparently the under educated know nothing about why and for what the peace prize is awarded???????

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Doesn’t the Bible say that the Humble will inherit the earth.
Congratulations Mr. President.
Leave those rightwinger in the fire of hell.
If America is so great, since when was it not a elitist country. It loves power, being number 1, being called on to solve problems. Well we now has a real man who is leading this great country.
To be negative of your leader is to be a true product of Satan, hmmm wasn’t be once called a nation of devil worshippers – is that the image we want to regain.
Not me I love my President and God Bless America.

Posted by: JCKnows | October 9, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Me Thinks…its the republicans who are worried about the presidents poll #s, and the honor of this award….guess its back to screaming at town halls and tea partys for you…to try and get some attention…

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

At least Obama will have something to brag about and give speeches to the international community about when he is booted out of office in 2012. The part I really love about the award citation is that it is awarding him for his “efforts” as opposed to awarding him for achievements. Did you know that he was nominated for this after only being in office for 11 days as the deadline for nominations is Feb 1st?

Posted by: Jason | October 9, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Republicans and the ‘right’ thrown into a fit of apoplectic hysteria by the awarding of the peace prize to Obama…..
how many bogus tea party folks will take a plane to the ceremony to scream and disrupt

Posted by: 007 | October 9, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

His win of the Peace Prize simply continues the path that, over the past few years especially, gives rewards whether deserved or not.
In the high schools around my area, the “top 10 in the class” has been dropped for fear that it would make others feel “inadequate”.
Look no further than the sports and entertainment industries. Everyday we have forced down our throats these young, painfully rich, idiots from Hollywood who have never “done” anything in their lives of substance, yet are put up on pedestals and given awards anyway.
Education, hard work, and ACTION (not just words) are quickly becoming passe. Why? Because we now live in a world of gimme-gimme-gimme with nothing in return. Why bother getting a good education? What’s the reward? God forbid should you be singled out for achievement-someone may be offended and left to feel inadequate. It’s much easier to just stay home, eat your Cheetos, have many kids (better benefits), and get your Food Stamps, Medicaid, Welfare, tax credits, etc. from the government. There’s plenty of taxpayers to cover for you, right?

Posted by: Shoe | October 9, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

cowgirl..How about explaining the justifications; and or, policies that has resulted in tangible evidence of world peace, abolishing or reducing standing armies, holding peace congresses etc.. behind Obama getting the Noble Peace Prize to us “less educated”…and PLEASE do not quote the statement provided by the “Committee” expounding his “efforts.” Efforts are intangible promises…

Posted by: Parallex View | October 9, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

since this is not american idol..we don’t get a vote on who gets the peace prize..they do not have to meet your criteria or mine…this is a pointless conversation…

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

“The Republican Party has thrown in its lot with the terrorists – the Taliban and Hamas this morning – in criticizing the President for receiving the Nobel Peace prize,” DNC communications director Brad Woodhouse told POLITICO.
So, when Libs like Sen. Chuck Schumer gleefully consider each troop death in Iraq putting the DNC one vote closer to Senate control, we are not supposed to question their patriotism.
But when Conservatives are relieved that Mayor Daley’s cronies will not be able to feast at the taxpayer trough while building the Olympic village, or mock the absurdity of Obama winning a Peace award for accomplishing nothing–then WE are the Traitors.

Posted by: Libs and the Lying Liars Who Elect Them | October 9, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

007 asks: “how many bogus tea party folks will take a plane to the ceremony to scream and disrupt[sic]”
The answer would be none. First, there are no bogus tea party folks, they were there, so they aren’t bogus or made up. Second, none of us could give a crap about the award, we are just pointing out the absurdity of it all.

Posted by: Jason | October 9, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

“You have to admire how Obama has magically turned Republicans into zealous defenders of Medicare. Republicans now insist that Medicare program does not have a cent of waste to trim and demand that it continue without change or evolution forever.”
Perhaps you are a bit premature with that assessment.
Though Steele and a few Republicans have tried to cynically cast themselves as defenders of Medicare hoping to grab some uninformed seniors, the base and leadership flipped out at ANY defense of the entitlement.
2010 is going to be interesting.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 9, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Just what he needs, an award to feed his already HUGE ego and for what? he hasn’t accomplished anything and this was determined two weeks into his taking Office.

Posted by: Scott | October 9, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

for people who don’t give a crap….but continue to be outraged…heres a case of toliet paper and a doggie pooper scooper…you are going to need it…and who said i have no sympathy for you right wingers????

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“Me thinks the European Liberals are getting worried about Obama’s poll numbers in American”
That would be strange since his poll numbers have been stable for the past month.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 9, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

considering the fact the only negative comments from around the world have been from Hamas, the taliban, and the republicans…you have joined a select group…even the president of Iran was moderate in his comment. sanity and the republican party have parted ways

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

there are no bogus tea party folks
Posted by: Jason
LOL…… sad that you refuse to ‘fess up to the lobbying/corporate funding and sponsorship of these misguided dupes of the right

Posted by: 007 | October 9, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

cowgirl…Your response to my inquiry, says it all…Thank You…

Posted by: Parallex View | October 9, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

ryanc…Stable???? That’s like asking someone if they want the good news or the bad news first…LOL…For a million bucks, who wants to settle for stable??

Posted by: Parallex View | October 9, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

do you know who won the prize in 2008 and why he won it????

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

MARTTI AHTISAARI
2008 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
for his important efforts, on several continents and over more than three decades, to resolve international conflicts…ever heard of this guy?????

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

It’s much easier to just stay home, eat your Cheetos, have many kids (better benefits), and get your Food Stamps, Medicaid, Welfare, tax credits, etc. from the government. There’s plenty of taxpayers to cover for you, right?
Posted by: Shoe
nothing like wide brush stereotyping and paranoia, you left out ‘welfare cadillacs’ ..
it’s wonderful to see someone like yourself expressing sentiments of such compassion and concern.
off to the FEMA camps with you to be ‘re-educated’

Posted by: Sasquatch | October 9, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Three decades of work vs. 9 months of promises…Yep, I can see the correlation………………….

Posted by: Parallex View | October 9, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Yes, and obama has accomplished more in his year…by promoting and encouraging dialouge around the world than he did in 3 decades…what does that say???

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

When will “The One” be canonized or beatified? Will the Pope issue a special bull and allow Barry to become a saint immediately? Change the rules so we can worship him while he is still alive. It is not fair for us mortals to have to wait decades to worship “The One”. Will famous Mullahs please let us know if “The One” is the Hidden Iman, the Madhi? This guy is not human. He is some kind of diety. I want to light a candle for Barry now. Barry, peace-be-upon-you, please grant us our prayers.

Posted by: Ed | October 9, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I notice Obama tried to deflect some of the absurdity of him winning the Nobel by telling cute comments from his kids.
Like he’s a regular, humble kind of guy that’s just a victim of circumstances.
He’s just too wonderful for his own good.

Posted by: millie | October 9, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

We’ve now reached the point where RNC press releases sound remarkably like mainstream news commentary instead of political P.R.
“The real question Americans are asking is, ‘What has President Obama actually accomplished?’ It is unfortunate that the president’s star power has outshined tireless advocates who have made real achievements working towards peace and human rights. One thing is certain – President Obama won’t be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action.”

Posted by: I'm Not a President, but I Play One on TV | October 9, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

“We’ve now reached the point where RNC press releases sound remarkably like mainstream news commentary instead of political P.R.”
That’s what happens when you watch too much FoxNews.
You start noticing that RNC press releases sound exactly like the FoxNews reporters.
Thinking people see that phenomenon and recognize that FoxNews is reporting RNC talking points.
Right wingers look at that phenomenon and assume the RNC got it from FoxNews.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 9, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

The world has turned upside down. But, then, the Prize has gone to Arafat, an AIDS conspiracy loon, and other lovelies. What a shame the President’s self-regard is being rewarded. Truly a President for our times!

Posted by: Michael R. Brown | October 9, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

I don’t know where you live, but all those around me have benifited from the stimulus packages, my brother bought a hybred he hadn’t planned on. a friend bought her first house because of the stimulus, and I and my co-workers had jobs instead of unemployment, and thankful to pay taxes because we had a income….what alternative universe do you live in????

Posted by: cowgirl | October 9, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

What? No prize for Physics as well? Obama has stated repeatedly his intention to “restore science to its rightful place” in America. Based on the Committee’s new standards of achievement in the field (good intentions vs. actual accomplishments) I would think Obama deserves the Physics prize as well, no? Talk about double standards!

Posted by: Woody | October 9, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

The award of this year’s Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals, and probably deep embarrassment by the President himself.
Rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan intent. It was clearly seen by the Norwegian Nobel committee as a way of expressing European gratitude for an end to the Bush Administration, approval for the election of America’s first black president, and hope that Washington will honour its promise to re-engage with the world.
Instead, the prize risks looking preposterous in its claims, patronising in its intentions, and demeaning in its attempt to build up a man who has barely begun his period in office, let alone achieved any tangible outcome for peace.

Posted by: Obama: World's Greatest Celebrity | October 9, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

As the world responded with a mixture of surprise and amazement to the announcement of President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize, Nobel insiders revealed that the President’s “beer summit” at the White House put him over the top.
“The committee was definitely split down the middle right up until the end,” said Agot Valle, a Norwegian politician and member of the five-person Nobel committee. “Some of them were still quite upset about that nasty business with the Somali pirates.”
But, according to Ms. Valle, “someone brought up the beer summit, and we all agreed that that was awesome.”
Ms. Valle said she hoped that Mr. Obama’s victory would be seen not only as a victory for him, but “as a tribute to the healing power of beer.”
Ms. Valle acknowledged that the President’s win was widely considered an upset, with most pundits having expected the prize to go to Mad Men or 30 Rock.

Posted by: Huff | October 9, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Boy oh boy. Listen to the right wing carp over this . . .

Posted by: tierra | October 9, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I didn’t know we had an ACORN Chapter in Oslo.

Posted by: Sunnyr | October 9, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

I dunno if I would want to be in the company of the last 3 winners, Jimmy Carter, Algore and Yasser Arafat. This Prize used to mean something and brought prestige to the winner. Now it’s a freaking joke and the Oslo jerks are the punch line.

Posted by: Sunnyr | October 9, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

The prize should have gone to Bush for his guitar strumming during Katrina.

Posted by: tierra | October 9, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

President Clinton has to be chewing nails.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | October 9, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

“I dunno if I would want to be in the company of the last 3 winners, Jimmy Carter, Algore and Yasser Arafat”
Yasser Arafat won in 1994.
Jimmy Carter won in 2002.
The right wing …stuck on stupid.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 9, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

This is ridiculous — embarrassing, even. I admire President Obama. I like President Obama. I voted for President Obama. But the peace prize? This is supposed to be for doing, not being — and it’s no disrespect to the president to suggest he hasn’t done much yet. Certainly not enough to justify the peace prize.
“Extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples?” “[C]aptured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future?” Please. This turns the award into something like pee-wee soccer: everybody wins for trying.

Posted by: Ruth Marcus | October 9, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Apparently, they now give out a Nobel Peace Prize for good intentions. Unless I have missed something, President Obama has not yet achieved a nuclear free world — which was also, by the way, Ronald Reagan’s good intention. He has not yet achieved peace between Israel and the Palestinians — a prospect the Israel Foreign Minister recently dismissed as years away. He has not yet tamed the nuclear ambitions of Iran, which has responded to outreach with deception, defiance, bloody crackdowns and missile testing. He has not yet pacified Afghanistan — preferring, so far, to dither and fidget. He has not yet removed the nuclear threat of North Korea, the world’s wackiest, totalitarian nuclear power. He has not yet solved the problems of global warming, achieved a free Tibet, ended the slaughter in Congo, lifted the oppression of Burma or settled the conflict in Darfur.
At first I thought the announcement of the prize was a joke. On further reflection, the Nobel Committee has made itself a joke. It has decided to give a ribbon before the race, a trophy for aspiration, a gold star for admirable sentiments. Which means that the decision it made is entirely, purely, solely political. Members of the committee like Obama’s goals and rhetoric. And since they aren’t American citizens, this is the only way they could vote for him. In the process, they have forfeited any claim to seriousness. Peace — the kind of peace that keeps people from being killed and oppressed — is an achievement, not a sentiment. The Nobel Peace Prize Committee can no longer distinguish between the two.
Intending to honor Obama, the committee has actually embarrassed him. Europe’s slobbering embrace of Obama is really the worship of its own reflected image — both are critical of America and elevate diplomatic process and promises over outcomes. Americans prefer their honors to come with achievements.

Posted by: Michael Gerson | October 9, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

George W. Bush launched a “preemptive” war. Now the Nobel Committee is trying for “preemptive” peace. I had always thought the way these things worked was that you helped bring peace or democracy to some corner of the globe first, and then you won the Nobel Prize. But this year, the Nobel Committee has turned that logic around: It clearly likes what Obama is trying to do: on nuclear disarmament, climate change and Middle East peace—and so, in a “preemptive” strike, it’s giving him the award now, in hopes that doing so will boost his chances of success later. It’s an interesting idea. Perhaps next they’ll start giving Oscars not to the people who have made the best movies of last year, but to the people who have the best chance of making the best movies next year. After all, once you’ve already made the movie, you no longer need the encouragement.

Posted by: Peter Beinart | October 9, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Did Barack Obama earn this Nobel peace prize? Obviously not. The world’s stockpile of nuclear weapons (the main specific area of his “work” named in the citation) hasn’t decreased by one that I’m aware of since he took office. He hasn’t made a dent in the Middle East yet. Iran hasn’t suddenly seen the light.
And, yes, there is the irony that he is in fact a war president, even now consulting with his top military people and – if I had to guess – preparing to send more troops, not fewer, to Afghanistan.
It must be said that it hasn’t been a great year for peace any way you slice it – how many years are? Still, I’d have to say there were many better choices.
So you have to wonder whether the Nobel committee has its tongue part-way up its cheek here. Or that the prize needed some star power. Or that they just really hated George Bush and wanted to make a point. Or something. I see that the fellow in charge said that “it was because we would like to support what he is trying to achieve”.

Posted by: Michael Tomasky | October 9, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Good move posting reasonable liberal critiques of this Nobel prize, right wingers.
The posts from your own commentators are just far too racist.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 9, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

How to Win the Nobel Peace Prize In 12 Days:
January 20: Sworn in as president. Went to a parade. Partied.
January 21: Asked bureaucrats to re-write guidelines for information requests. Held an “open house” party at the White House.
January 22: Signed Executive Orders: Executive Branch workers to take ethics pledge; re-affirmed Army Field Manual techniques for interrogations; expressed desire to close Gitmo (how’s that working out?)
January 23: Ordered the release of federal funding to pay for abortions in foreign countries. Lunch with Joe Biden; met with Tim Geithner.
January 24: Budget meeting with economic team.
January 25: Skipped church.
January 26: Gave speech about jobs and energy. Met with Hillary Clinton. Attended Geithner’s swearing in ceremony.
January 27: Met with Republicans. Spoke at a clock tower in Ohio.
January 28: Economic meetings in the morning, met with Defense secretary in the afternoon.
January 29: Signed Ledbetter Bill overturning Supreme Court decision on lawsuits over wages. Party in the State Room. Met with Biden.
January 30: Met economic advisers. Gave speech on Middle Class Working Families Task Force. Met with senior enlisted military officials.
January 31: Took the day off.
February 1: Skipped church. Threw a Super Bowl party.
So there you have it. The short path to the Nobel Peace Prize: Party, go to meetings, skip church, release federal funding to pay for abortions in foreign countries, party some more.

Posted by: Tommy DeSeno | October 9, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Go Claire (McCaskill, a moderate Democrat from Missouri). She writes, under the heading of “The Twilight Zone”–
“I feel that I’m in an alternative universe. For eight years some people called anyone who disagreed with the President’s foreign policy or war in Iraq unpatriotic. Then in the course of two weeks, those same people cheer when the United States does not get selected for the Olympics and boo when our President is the unanimous choice for the Nobel Peace Prize. Go figure.
Congratulations Mr. President for standing up to the scorn and derision of your opponents in the election when you firmly stood for the proposition that strength meant being willing to talk to your enemies, not just your allies. Thank you for the confidence and wisdom to say that a hand will be extended when their fist is unclenched. And thank you for understanding that our national security rests on our principles, the example we set for the world, and our alliances along with the excellence and strength of our military, rather than exclusively the latter. God Bless America.”

Posted by: Alyson | October 9, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

I thought it was BS that can never be topped when Mr. Obama was eleted. But this Nobel Peace Prize to Mr. Obama is the most BS thing I have seen in US history.

Posted by: young_voter | October 9, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

The award is also an example of what Nobel scholars call the growing aspirational trend of Nobel committees over the past three decades, by which awards are given not for what has been achieved but in support of the cause being fought for.
Thorbjørn Jagland, the committee chairman, made clear that this year’s prize fell in that category. “If you look at the history of the Peace Prize, we have on many occasions given it to try to enhance what many personalities were trying to do,” he said.
________________________________________
Thank you.

Posted by: tierra | October 9, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I’m sure the families of all the Iraqi and Afghani civilians killed and wounded by Obama are THRILLED at Obama’s win. Hooray for Peace!

Posted by: Mary | October 9, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

The best part is trying to imagine Bill Clinton’s reaction. Think of it: Carter has one, Gore has one, and now Obama. This is not going down well in Chappaqua, you may rest assured.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 9, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Asst Secretary PJ Crowley quote (Crowley is a spokesman for the State Dept.):
“Certainly from our standpoint this gives us a sense of momentum–when the United States has accolades thrown its way rather than shoes.”

Posted by: Alyson | October 9, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

===Well this is not how I expected to woke up this morning,” the president said ===
I hope this is a typo and not a direct quote from our president.

Posted by: Axey | October 9, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

“Boy oh boy. Listen to the right wing carp over this . . .”
Marc Lamont Hill will be surprised to discover that he’s a right winger.

Posted by: PD | October 9, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

So let me get this straight.
Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize but he had no time to meet with a REAL peacemaker, the Dalai Lama, at the White House?

Posted by: Jenn | October 9, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

I really think they should close this Nobel Peace Prize shop, stop its operation, investigate for questionable conduct. I hope some of the past winners will return the 1.4 millions that they had won. Who is the lobbyist who donates the money anyway?

Posted by: young_voter | October 9, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

I really think they should close this Nobel Peace Prize shop, stop its operation, investigate for questionable conduct.
______________________________
Try learning a little something about the organisation before you presume to condemn it.
The award is also an example of what Nobel scholars call the growing aspirational trend of Nobel committees over the past three decades, by which awards are given not for what has been achieved but in support of the cause being fought for.
Thorbjørn Jagland, the committee chairman, made clear that this year’s prize fell in that category. “If you look at the history of the Peace Prize, we have on many occasions given it to try to enhance what many personalities were trying to do,” he said.

Posted by: tierra | October 9, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

It seems most of these guys are socialists in some form.
Norwegian Nobel Committee Members (as of October, 2009)
* Thorbjørn Jagland (chair, born 1950), member of Parliament, President of the Storting and former cabinet minister for the Labour Party. Member and chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee since 2009.
* Kaci Kullmann Five (deputy chair, born 1951), former member of Parliament and cabinet minister for the Conservative Party. Member of the Norwegian Nobel Committee since 2003, deputy chair since 2009.
* Sissel Rønbeck (born 1950), deputy director, Norwegian Directorate for Cultural Heritage (Riksantikvaren), former member of parliament and cabinet minister for the Labour Party. Member of the Norwegian Nobel Committee since 1994.
* Inger-Marie Ytterhorn (born 1941), former member of Parliament for the Progress Party. Member of the Norwegian Nobel Committee since 2000.
* Ågot Valle (born 1945), member of parliament for the Socialist Left Party. Member of the Norwegian Nobel Committee since 2009.
The Labour Party is officially a social democratic party committed to social democratic ideals. During the last 20 years, the party has included more principles of market liberalism in its policy, allowing for privatization of government-held assets and services and reducing income tax progressivity, following the liberal wave of the 1980s.
The Labour Party profiles itself as a progressive party that subscribes to cooperation on a national as well as international level.
This may or could have been a protest or a truer form to the Nobel Peace Prize.
The International Gandhi Peace Prize, named after Mahatma Gandhi, is awarded annually by the Government of India.
As a tribute to the ideals espoused by Gandhi, the Government of India launched the International Gandhi Peace Prize in 1995 on the occasion of the 125th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. This is an annual award given to individuals and institutions for their contributions towards social, economic and political transformation through non-violence and other Gandhian methods. The award carries Rs. 10 million in cash, convertible in any currency in the world, a plaque and a citation. It is open to all persons regardless of nationality, race, creed or sex.

Posted by: young_voter | October 9, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

I feel Obama is very deserving of the
Nobel Peace Prize. He has worked from
the start of his term to bring relations
back from countries that George Bush had
destroyed. He is very intelligent and
thinks before he speaks. George Bush
was not smart enough to be President.
He ruined peace relations with many
countries. I am glad the other countries
feel the same way I do.

Posted by: P.A. Powers | October 10, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

as one that follows these things… the appearance of it is unsettling even if the president qualifies I mean the movie “a Beautiful Mind” where the guy won the peace prize for Economics was more realistic

Posted by: JG | October 10, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I am no conservative but getting the award for “not being George W Bush” is sortof embarrassing… in this country we used to earn things by wrote

Posted by: JG | October 10, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

I’m sure the families of all the Iraqi and Afghani civilians killed and wounded by Obama
Posted by: Mary
- of course this post was made to have some fun with what used to be said about Bush by the ‘left’.
Blaming Obama in any way for Iraq lacks all credibility even in jest, and says more about the person trying to ‘be funny’ by drawing an inane analogy.
perhaps, the more salient point is the attempt to cover the terrible crimes and strategic blinders, foreign policy debacles and more.
there has been a concerted effort by conservatives, republicans and the right wing to ‘clean up’ what they consider to be a Bush legacy of achievement, while ignoring the current calamitous state of America the Bush administration left.
There are, for sure concrete results that can be seen from the last 8 years of republican policy.., and, they are, to be kind, not impressive from a domestic or foreign policy perspective, indeed, one may argue that the Bush administration has come as close as any enemy to destroying america.
While it is difficult to imagine any politicians in our government not beholden to ‘special interests, it is the republican representation that has done the most damage to american society to crush the middle class. The GOP has now staked it’s claim and policy, to nihilism and hatred of working america.
The healthcare reform policies and the vehement anti-Obama rage for the Nobel award only bring clarity to the paranoia, xenophobia, abject hate that now permeates the ‘right’.

Posted by: Flash Forward | October 10, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am

He may have been given The Nobel Peace Prize, but he didn’t earn it. Neither did that senile old goat Carter!

Posted by: JV | October 10, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

A SMILE IS CERTAINLY IN ORDER, BUT KNOWING THAT PROBABLY THE COMMITTEE IS MADE UP OF WAY OUT LIBS ANYWAY – WHY THE HELL NOT?

Posted by: Jimbo | October 10, 2009, 6:49 am 6:49 am

Since the Nobel Peace Prize committee is made up of members of the Norwegian Parliament, the Prize has become Norway`s method of becoming a voice in world politics.
Norway is a far out of the way, cold, wet, small nobody country in the world and their egoistic politicians must feel slighted for no one listening to their lofty, intellectual Nordic wisdom. Hence they use the Nobel Peace Prize as their only way to inject their politics onto the world stage.
Instead of calling it the the “Nobel Peace Prize”, they should change the name to the “Norwegian Politics Prize”, given the person who most reflects the political opinion of the Norwegian parliament.

Posted by: Bill | October 10, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

I personally think we all are ignoring the sacrifice that President Obama will make in accepting the reward. It’s a really long trip, but I’m sure the President will do it selflessly.
Perhaps there should be a prize for accepting the prize, too.

Posted by: dave | October 10, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Paul Raushenbush at Beliefnet:
“Anyone who domestically dismisses these efforts will have explain why America has risen in the past ten months to be the most admired nation in the world after having fallen during President Bush’s terms.”
Juan Cole:
“But the Right in the United States is to peace as velociraptors were to vegetarianism. They don’t believe in the ideal for which the award stands in the first place.”

Posted by: Alyson | October 10, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

The best part is trying to imagine Bill Clinton’s reaction. Think of it: Carter has one, Gore has one, and now Obama. This is not going down well in Chappaqua, you may rest assured.

Posted by: WPclassifieds.net | October 10, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Norway is a far out of the way, cold, wet, small nobody country in the world and their egoistic politicians must feel slighted for no one listening to their lofty, intellectual Nordic wisdom.
Posted by: Bill
oh my, – sounds like an upcoming ‘right wing’ rationale for invading Norway, … the nerve of them, to make an independent decision without the OK of America..best to turn Norway into a parking lot.

Posted by: Sasquatch | October 10, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

it is a shame that someone who opposed removing a vicious dictator [Saddam Hussein] is considered a person of peace, an absolute joke from people with little heart and no brains.

Posted by: Hasan Faris | October 10, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

the committee that decides who will receive a Nobel Peace prize every year can decide on whomever they please, so it would be silly on more levels than one to criticize Obama for winning one

Posted by: Sam Kaufman | October 11, 2009, 4:09 am 4:09 am

There is absolutely nothing humble about Barack Obama.
Neda Soltan should have won the Peace Prize.
The Nobel Committee has reduced itself to a bad joke.

Posted by: drjohn | October 11, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Neda Soltan should have won the Peace Prize.
Posted by: drjohn | Oct 11, 2009 11:56:48 AM
The thing that most bothers me about right wingers is their willingness to exploit people and goodness and courage for their partisan, less-than-noble causes. Children in a classroom, Jesus, and now Neda Soltan. Beyond the fact that Nobel prizes arent’ awarded posthumously, what really bothers me about the Nobel for Neda campaign is that it seems really exploitative and disrespectful of Neda’s courage and humanity. Neda was a very courageous young Iranian woman who can no longer speak for herself. To use her and her death as a symbol for someone else’s partisan and divisive political beliefs feels deeply wrong. It doesn’t surprise me that a commenter here would go there, but it’s sad.

Posted by: Alyson | October 11, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

There is absolutely nothing humble about Barack Obama.
Posted by: drjohn
why don’t you explain how he’s not ‘humble’

Posted by: espirto | October 12, 2009, 3:04 am 3:04 am

I DID NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA AND AM TOTALLY OPPOSED TO HIS IDEAS, BUT THE PRIZE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM. ALL IT IS, IS THE LIBS IN NORWAY TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE FIRST EUROPEAN THINKING LEADER OF THE USA TO PUSH THEIR AGENDA.

Posted by: Jimbo | October 12, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.