Peace Prize Politics: 6 Key Questions
EmailThe big one, of course, WILL IT BACKFIRE ON OBAMA? The President played good defense in the Rose Garden, deftly deflecting the critics by agreeing with them: “I do not feel I deserve to be in the company” of other Nobel winners. Perfect pitch. The President not only had to say he was humbled, he had to appear to mean it. His body language this morning certainly conveyed that sense. He appeared almost embarrassed by the honor. That will help focus more of the criticism on the Nobel Committee than the White House.
WILL NOBEL COMMITTEE GET ITS WISH? ie. A strengthened US diplomatic hand with Iran, North Korea over their nuclear programs. WH aides hope and expect that it will help by further isolating Iran and North Korea. It’s likely to make IAEA director Mohammed El-Baradei’s job easier for at least a few weeks, and it should also encourage our European partners. But will it move Putin? Unlikely. China? Not at all.
DOES PRIZE TIP BALANCE EITHER WAY ON AFGHANISTAN? If the truly hasn’t made up his mind, will it be a little harder for him to resist Petraeus and McChrystal? Might he feel a subtle pull to counter praise from the dovish Nobel Committee by accepting the hawkish recommendations of his military commanders? Or does this reinforce his wariness to double down on this war? My guess is that any Nobel effect is marginal at most. Some middle ground still seems most likely.
HOW ABOUT HEALTH CARE? Our pollster Gary Langer points out that Nobel prizes for political figures aren’t usually met by broad public support. But the prize is likely to encourage Obama supporters who’ve lost some of last year’s enthusiasm as the health care debate grinds on, and it may give him an extra point or two of job approval. All that helps a bit, especially in the crunch when the President has to convince loyal House Democrats to swallow that excise tax on insurance policies or a conference report without the public option they crave. What it won’t do: stop the insurance companies, hospitals and Catholic Bishops from declaring war if their problems with the Committee bills aren’t fixed.
WILL CONSERVATIVE CRITICS STRIKE A CHORD OR SEEM PETULANT? I’m torn on this one. As my friend Keith Appell has shown the Nobel jokes write themselves. Limbaugh’s having more fun today than he did last Friday. It could work. But I think John McCain created the template for the GOP with his more considered response: simultaneously skeptical and patriotic.
SWELLED HEAD FOR PRESIDENT? As noted above, no public sign of that yet. But he had plenty of confidence to spare before today – and last week’s trip to Copenhagen displayed more than a touch of hubris. Hard to blame the guy if this went to his head. He’ll just have to be careful about showing it.
- George Stephanopoulos
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention 
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
The simple fact is that the Nobel Committee can give the prize to whomever they choose. Everyone else will just have to deal with it. It’s not like this is the first controversial Peace prize. What’s the big deal? As usual it’s not really a big deal, but everybody blows it out of proportion… return to your desks and get to work! Put your money in the bank and stop using your credit cards if you can’t pay them off at the end of the month, and try to contribute to a better world!
Posted by: Jakbo | October 9, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Forget about the judgement of the Nobel cmmte. What does it say about Obama that HE thinks he deserves it enough to actually accept them damn thing?
Posted by: James Wigderson | October 9, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Obama = SWELLED head syndrome.
the Copenhagen trip was more than a touch of hubris — it was ALL hubris.
Posted by: x | October 9, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
James: Well, he said he was humbled by the honor. An appropriate response if you ask me. Personally I think Americans should be proud, but some people think that being patriotic, something that was very fashionable only a few months ago, is old.
Posted by: Jakob | October 9, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
The wingnuts are going over the cliff.
John Bolton suggests that George Bush would be a more deserving winner.
Posted by: doug | October 9, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
What a petty, sniping little article: taking it for granted that Obama will be harmed by getting a prestigious prize. George should be ashamed of himself for the obnoxious tone – but being in the beltway bubble, of course he can’t see how small this makes him look.
Posted by: Marc | October 9, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Obama HIMSELF said he doesn’t think he deserved the award.
I AGREE.
So why should he accept an award he doesn’t even think he deserves?
Obama and I, two haters I guess.
Posted by: David from WI | October 9, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Never in my life have I seen someone awarded with so much (the U.S. presidency and the Nobel prize)and not really accomplished anything. I guess this is a sign of the times – spin, spin and spin counts for much more than accomplishments. The media certainly adds to this by annointing Obama as the Chosen One (Messiah).
Posted by: nybellhead | October 9, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Are you kidding me??? This award is a joke. He certainly did nothing within the first nine days of taking office to derserve it ( and nothing since!) But this is the same Euro-liberal committee who gave this award to Yassir Arafat and Jimmy (Y’all racists”) Carter. The Nobel Committee, like most liberal groups, rewards whatever weakens America!
Posted by: country cuz | October 9, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Who is this George fellow, ever been elected or worked for a living? I understand he plays to the Hannity FOX News Crowd…keeping his options open?
Posted by: Patrik | October 9, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
I believe the Republicans are jealous..
Posted by: DirtyShame | October 9, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Féliciations aux É.U.
FRANCE SUPPORT USA!! BRAVO! USA IS STARTING TO SHINE AGAIN!
Posted by: PICSOU | October 9, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Jakob– thinking that Obama doesn’t deserve it has nothing to do with being patriotic or not.
Example: a few years ago, the Colts (my team) played the Steelers in a playoff game. The Steelers were up, and the game seemingly over when Troy Polamalu intercepted Peyton Manning with a short amount of time left. The call was challenged, and even though Polamalu clearly intercepted Manning, overturned, giving the Colts back the ball. They drove down the field, scored, and then drove back down the field to put them in the position to kick a field goal. Now, the Colts are my team, but I found myself hoping that Vanderjagt missed the field goal. Not because I’m not a fan– I love the Colts– but because I didn’t want us to take a playoff win away from a deserving team just because of awful officiating. The kicker missed the FG, the Steelers went on to win, and the NFL later admitted that the interception shouldn’t have been overturned. I was upset that we lost the game, but glad that we didn’t advance in the playoffs undeservedly.
When somebody stands to take something away from somebody else because of unfairness or poor judgment, reasonable people don’t want to see that happen. But nobody ever accused Obama supporters are being reasonable, so go ahead– celebrate your Nobel prize-winner. But don’t you dare accuse us of being unpatriotic for not reveling in ill-gotten gains.
Posted by: CH | October 9, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
REPUBLICANS SAY YES YES YES TO ONLY ONE THING :
MORE TROOPS! WE WANT MORE WAR! WE WANT MORE TROOPS!
Please Mc Chrystal make it public so that we can have more money with the war industry. MORE TROOPS! SHAME ON REPUBLICANS! SHAME ON REPUBLICANS! SHAME ON REPUBLICANS!
Posted by: PICSOU | October 9, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Obama said this is a call to action. The prize is implied to be given to someone to took action and did something. A prize is not given as an encouragement, but as a reward for success.
Posted by: wtf | October 9, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Has Obama “earned” the award? Certainly not, but sometimes a committee wants to encourage green shoots and reinforce a trend and influence future trends rather than merely acknowledge the past. It is the Nobel committee’s prerogative.
Posted by: Greg | October 9, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I am absolutely thrilled for the President. For those who disagree–you’ll get over it!!!!!!! You are jealous that it was not bestowed upon you.
Apparently GOD approves. Amen!
Posted by: Lynda | October 9, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
George, are you hung over from your Hannity interview? Backfire? Come on.
Posted by: newz4i | October 9, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
GEORGE! WAKE UP ! REPUBLICANS ARE DESTROYING YOUR COUNTRY!
Posted by: PICSOU | October 9, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
The committee erred when a prize was awarded for encouragement instead of giving it a reward for success to action.
Posted by: wtf | October 9, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Wow, George. I didn’t realize you were a Fox News supporter until right now. I’m very proud & happy. You, on the other hand seem to need a reason to complain?
Posted by: tessieroo | October 9, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Obama embarrassed the United States by accepting this award.
He is clearly mentally ill with a severe form of narcissism. Unfortunately, the nation is going to continue suffering mightily under his delusions.
This will not be good for the U.S. over the long term. The quicker we can rid ourselves of the narcissist Obama, the better America and the world. It begins with the 2010 elections. Wake up, folks.
Posted by: Monique | October 9, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
FROM GERMANY : GERMANS SUPPORT USA!BRAVO TO YOUR PRESIDENT!
Posted by: Heike | October 9, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Pres. Obama was in office 12 whole days when the nomination period closed on Feb 1, 2009.
What did Pres Obama accomplish is 12 days to even be nominated, much less win a Nobel Peace Prize?
When a Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Yasser Arafat, I knew something was very wrong with the selection process.
It’s just gotten worse.
This is why Nobel Prizes are not taken seriously.
Will it backfire on Obama? Almost certainly.
It’s just another example of the messiah complex.
It’s another undeserved honor heaped upon Obama.
His legacy will be disappointment,disillusionment, and despair.
Posted by: MisElaineous | October 9, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
George, get a grip. You can’t let the President enjoy this for a few hours before questioning it. Do me a favor and write something enjoyable for once.
Posted by: J. | October 9, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
AT LEAST THE STIMULUS PACKAGE AND THE HEALTH CARE REFORM DON’T KILL PEOPLE, IT SAVE PEOPLE’S JOB AND LIVES.
REPUBLICANS WANT ONE THING : MORE WAR AND MORE PEOPLE TO BE KILLED
Posted by: Lena | October 9, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
This award smells like something from the playbook of Obama’s boss George Soros designed to lull the world by weakening America.
Posted by: Jackson | October 9, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
I VOTED FOR GOP and I regret so much! THEY SUPPORT JUST THE MORE TROOPS.
NO more republicans!
Posted by: NOtoGOP | October 9, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
This is a joke. Once again, the Nobel Peace prize is worthless.
Posted by: ata2d | October 9, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
What…hamas wasn’t availabled?
We got punked…..
Posted by: Reality2009 | October 9, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
It is the typical republican response, and shows how much hatred is really in this party. No matter who wins this prize, it is a great honor. All Americans should be rejoicing that it was bestowed on an American sitting president. But no, we cannot allow that is this screwed up country. The right will denounce, cry, whine, belittle, instigate hate, spew their typical racist rhetoric, and otherwise keep to their typical agenda. And we are fighting terrorist abroad?
Posted by: Chuck | October 9, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I don’t like the fact that a sitting U.S. president has been given this award, particularly when our soldiers are fighting in foreign countries. Are they trying to influence his decisions? I wonder if it is against our constitution or the powers of the president (or something) for him to accept this award at this time.
Posted by: Susan | October 9, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
So what! It doesn’t mean that much. Never really did. Carter and Arafat got the peace prize for attempting to bring peace to the mideast and they’re still going at it. Nobel himself was reticent about how it would be ‘used’.
Posted by: LongT | October 9, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
If you think people are jealous about Obama winning the Nobel Prize you are wrong. The sinking feeling I get is the award has been degraded. ( on top of Al Gore winning the prize ) It would have been more appropriate to wait ten years after the administration had been completed and where scholars could have analyzed all the decisions. In the future, when a deserving scientist wins the prize it will not carry as much prestige with me.
Posted by: Jablabla | October 9, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
While Obama continues to screw around, troops are dying because of his indecision and incompetence.
Obama is a disgrace.
Posted by: Beth | October 9, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
What did Obama do in his first two weeks to merit this award? They should call it the Nobel “False Peace” Prize.
Posted by: False Peace | October 9, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Everyone, even those who believe Obama is wonderful, must think that his getting this award is kind of odd. All he has done at this point is give a few good speeches.
Posted by: Susan | October 9, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
A Nobel peace prize for giving good speeches?
I think the Nobel Committee just devalued their award a bit.
Posted by: Open-Mind | October 9, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
CH: He was awarded the prize, deservedly or not, so he humbly accepted. I think it would have looked worse if he had rejected. And in any case, that would have accomplished nothing. You think the committee would have said, OK, great, we’ll select the number two on the list? No, he would have embarrassed himself. So, he accepts and knows that the expectations are up. That’s it. Keep arguing that he didn’t deserve it and see where it will get you. I have never said that he deserved it, but why the fuss?
Posted by: Jakob | October 9, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
“Never in my life have I seen someone awarded with so much (the U.S. presidency and the Nobel prize)and not really accomplished anything. ” : Please explain how he was “awarded” the presidency. Last I checked our republic votes for the leader of the free world. So by majority of the citizens of this great country he earned the presidency, he wasn’t awarded it. Thats like saying the Steelers were awarded the Super Bowl last year. By the way, the Nobel Prize is not something you campaign for so why blame Obama for winning it? I love the irrational hatred for a guy in a country that spouses Judeo Christian values. Jesus is clapping with approval I’m sure.
Posted by: gammaraygus | October 9, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Never in my life have I seen someone awarded with so much (the U.S. presidency and the Nobel prize)and not really accomplished anything. I guess this is a sign of the times – spin, spin and spin counts for much more than accomplishments. The media certainly adds to this by annointing Obama as the Chosen One (Messiah).
I agree with this posters blog as copied above! The only thing I see that can be done is to PRAY PRAY PRAY and wait until his term is up and then PRAY PRAY PRAY and VOTE VOTE VOTE!
Posted by: DONNA j. | October 9, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
This award is not a good thing for America and will only serve to deepen the growing feelings around the world that Obama is an empty suit and poser.
Obama needs acccomplishments to gain the respect of Americans and the world, not fluffy accolades.
Get to work, Obama, and actually DO something, anything.
Posted by: Jackie | October 9, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Maybe George is being objective.
Posted by: LongT | October 9, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
I can’t believe that people are complaining because our President received the Nobel Peace Prize. I guess no matter what he does they will have criticism of it. I’m proud of him…he is a decent man and trying to get our country on the right track. Bush Cheney ruined this country and nothing much was done or said. Now it seems every step and every word from this president is criticized. I am ashamed of some of the remarks I see on these posts. It is one thing not to agree with the president, it is another to be so hateful and mean. It seems no one discusses anything rationally anymore, it’s just ranting and screaming…like Rush and Limbaugh. It’s a disgrace. No wonder our country is in such a mess.
Posted by: Barb | October 9, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
He appeared almost embarrassed by the honor.
HE SHOULD BE!…I KNOW I AM!
Posted by: STEVE | October 9, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Sam’s Bottom Line: When ABCNews.com is running an opinion piece as front page lead, it means all the editors are at lunch and the columnists are drawing straws for the top slot.
Posted by: Yukon Sam | October 9, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Can AMERICANS BE PROUD OF THEIR COUNTRY ONCE ? It seems that americans are against their own country.
I don’t get it I’M FROM CANADA WE SUPPORT SO MUCH OUR PRIME MINISTER.
I DON’T GET IT, THE ANTI-AMERICANS ARE THE AMERICANS CITIZENS ? PLEASE EXPLAIN ME, from CANADA WE just don’t get it.
Posted by: Geneviève | October 9, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
“You can’t let the President enjoy this for a few hours before questioning it”
OBAMA HIMSELF QUESTIONED THE AWARD.
HE DOESN’T THINK HE DESERVED IT.
Get back into reality.
President Obama shares the view of Americans who DON’T think he earned it.
The far left are losing their minds and have gone off the deep end and are falling faster and faster.
Oh lets call Bush a war criminal and then get mad when people call this president names. Oh no its Obama it might hurt his feelings.
ITS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRESS TO QUESTION THE GOV’T at least George is doing what so many of the rest of the press are not.
I may not agree with George many times, but I can respect him for asking questions that SHOULD BE ASKED more than the rest of the main stream media.
Posted by: David from WI | October 9, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Even in la la Obamaland, the Chicago Tribune.com poll shows that a whopping 72 percent of readers say Obama should not have recevied this award.
Obama cheapens America with his arrogance.
Posted by: Larreau | October 9, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Monique: You are a prime example of what I’m talking about.
Posted by: Barb | October 9, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Well what else has he done to promote world peace? Just what is the basis for this award? The only reason I can think of is to influence his decisions.
Posted by: Susan | October 9, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
WHY AMERICANS AREN’T PROUD OF THEIR PRESIDENT ?
THEY JUST REJECT ANYTHING that come from him, EVEN WHEN IT’S GOOD FOR THEIR COUNTRY.
PRESIDENT OBAMA : CONGRADULATIONS! USA IS STARTING TO SHINE AGAIN.
Posted by: Geneviève | October 9, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
This is a travesty. It shows how worthless this award really it. Arafat, Gore, Obama? What happened to the people who actually did something, like the political prisoner in Burma or the Mothers in Ireland who both received one years ago when it meant something. To put these yahoos in this class should be embarassing.
Posted by: betsy | October 9, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Ahem…I thought you had to have a body of work in whatever field a Nobel prize was awarded. To award this based on a hope that he gets something done is literally childish and naive in the extreme.
It’s not that I don’t like Obama, but its kind of like a new employee winning Employee of the Month during the first week on the job!
Posted by: lovedori | October 9, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
What should O do with the prize everyone including himself knows he does not deserve? (Remember O supporters he was only 12 DAYS into his presidency when he was nominated,what had he accomplished other than wearing a tux?) If he were truly anxious to prove he was all that, he would refuse it and quiet the controversy.What about the prize money? Donate it to one of the humanitarian organizations that lost out to him.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 9, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Man, so much Obama-hate. It’s hard to tell just how much President Obama has or has not succeded at things, what with all the venom spewing from the righties.
Posted by: knowerseeker | October 9, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
The election of Obama was a national movement that became an international inspiration. Its overriding themes were give diplomacy a chance/war as a last resort; we can only succeed if we all work together; and a return to the decency and ideals at America’s core. It was a tidal wave that swept the country and globe with a new hope. His incredible movement won the prize, not the accomplishments of the presidency, yet.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 9, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
get over it folks, he got the prize – he is the president – he will get health care through – We are a dying country thanks to republicans. Obama will do what he can but the days of red white and blue are over . We are no longer the United States of America – we are just part of the Americas – central south and middle. Our best days are behind us.
Posted by: cjr | October 9, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Gee, America sure is full of hate. Just look at all these comments. Maybe the world sees Obama as positive symbol for America instead of all the ugliness that people like Rush and the GOP spew. The conservatives won’t be happy until they elect another dictator like Bush. It’s called being a “sorry loser” you cry-babies.
Posted by: sanedemocrat | October 9, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Not sure how you win for something you may do in the future. I can think of some people who are more deserving. He was picked after being in office for two weeks? What has he done? I am a bit disappointed in this process now.
Posted by: Deborah | October 9, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Unemployment approaching 20 percent.
Troops dying while Obama dithers.
Dollar sinking.
Deficit exploding.
But REJOICE, people! Our savior Obama has won a prize!!
mmmm, mmmm, mmmm.
This worship is a fools game, Kool Aid Kids, that is going to destroy America in the long run if left unchecked.
2010 and 2012 can’t come soon enough.
Posted by: HH | October 9, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
President Obama called for the end of nuclear weapons across the world. Isn’t that enough to win a peace prize? IMHO, since the US is the only country to ever use “the bomb,” it shows leadership for President Obama to begin a serious nuclear disarmament process.
Posted by: Julie | October 9, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Is this not just another example of welfare for the elite???
Posted by: jafo | October 9, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Americans just love their president, don’t they.
Posted by: NotAnAmerican | October 9, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Guess this is just more of the GOP backlash, from across the pond.
There isn’t much other explanation for it, frankly.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 9, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
George, it seems that obama is heading towards this “just talk” label sticking to him. Is this a good thing?
Moku
Posted by: moku | October 9, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
I don’t like this at all. It just doesn’t feel right. Obama is in the process of determining/weighing the mission in Afghanistan and whether or not to send more troops after a request has been made and he gets the Nobel Peace Prize. This is so surreal.
Posted by: Susan | October 9, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
GERMANY WANT TO SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT!
BRAVO USA! BRAVO!
Posted by: Heike | October 9, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Obama HIMSELF said he doesn’t think he deserved the award.
I AGREE.
So why should he accept an award he doesn’t even think he deserves?
Obama and I, two haters I guess.
===========================
BUT HE STILL WILL GLADLY ACCEPT IT.
Posted by: Jeff | October 9, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
“WHY AMERICANS AREN’T PROUD OF THEIR PRESIDENT ?
THEY JUST REJECT ANYTHING that come from him, EVEN WHEN IT’S GOOD FOR THEIR COUNTRY. ”
After eight years of, not only honest criticism, but INSANE RANTINGS against George W Bush you are out of your minds to think a president is immune from being criticized for ANYTHING he does.
New to politics are you? They are criticized for doing ANYTHING and doing NOTHING!
Nothing new and why do so many people think Obama should be immune from the same treatment ANY politician gets.
He is a president after all not a King.
Posted by: David from WI | October 9, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
George, you are making me ILL. Why do you hate President Obama, why? This is a great honor for the country and the president, but you always look for the negative. Please leave your commentary out of the news. You need to quit this foolishness.
Posted by: justbeingme | October 9, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Americans just love their president, don’t they. Wow, the lengths people are going to reduce this president to zero. Notsurprising at all.
Posted by: NotAnAmerican | October 9, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
How much worse could this have been timed, coming as it does on the heels of so much “nada” criticism?
Just as that was starting to die down, this award begs the very same questions – from both left and right – over precisely what the President has accomplished thus far.
Posted by: Lisa | October 9, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
We live in the era of fame without accomplishment…we have Paris Hilton, John and Kate plus Eight and a President who hasn’t been around long enough to get anything done.
Posted by: scritamc | October 9, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I have always been a GOP voter. I’M A SHAME OF THE GOP politics now more than ever!
Posted by: Heike | October 9, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
While I agree that he does not deserve the award he will accept it anyhow, why the heck would he turn down a photo op like that?
Posted by: Emmy | October 9, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I say CONGRATULATIONS PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA!!!! I support you, this country supports you (except for the small amount of GOP haters) and the world supports you!!! Whether the haters want to see it or not, Mr. Obama has stepped out to try to meet with leaders across this great world and has reached out to them for us all to work together for peace in the world. That is why he won.
If this was Bush the GOP would be hollering it is well deserved when in fact Bush has never really been for world peace. He never reached out to our adversaries to make amends unless forced to do so, and usually him being forced means he didn’t do or he did it with a grudge.
Again CONGRATULATIONS PRESIDENT OBAMA!
Posted by: ahem | October 9, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
George, If I didn’t know better I would think you worked for FOX NEWS, are you interviewing with them or something ?? The reaction to Obama’s selection is quite sickining !! The jealousy and Republican vemon is tearing our country apart !!!!! Work together people, do not tear each other down.. It’s know wonder why some countries do not like us because we do not know how to act and treat each other with class and respect!!!!
Posted by: Cathy | October 9, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I cannot believe the ignorance of some people. And as an American, I’m proud. Not that Obama won the award. Rather, because it shows that the United States has regained its standing in the world. That merely by speaking, rather than invading a country, and bullying allianating the world we can actually get things done. I’m sorry to say, whoever is critizing this award needs to take a good look in the mirror and asks themselves why are you different than the Taliban or Hamas? You root for people to fail, not to win. And in doing such, you are NOT an American.
Posted by: MomKat | October 9, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Monique | Oct 9, 2009 1:36:07 PM posted “This will not be good for the U.S. over the long term. The quicker we can rid ourselves of the narcissist Obama, the better America and the world. It begins with the 2010 elections. Wake up, folks.”
First, people become annoyed with the call to “wake up” just because they nmay disagree with your politics.
Second, how do you “know” this will not be good for the US in the long term, and that our president is “clearly mentally ill”?
Check out the definition of “projection” in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It’s a defense mechanism for maladaptive behavior – a refuge used by extreme right wing zealots who cannot cope with reality.
Posted by: green.goddess | October 9, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
The Republicans should just say: “Congratulations Mr. President” and take pride in the recognition our country has received by this award. Instead they continue their drumbeat for failure and their politics of “No”.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 9, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I am sure there are people who will always have negative things to say about President Obama, no matter what. I myself am not a goose stepping follower, but I will recognize that since the Nobel Committee deemed him worthy I will agree. What did Ang Sang Sui Kyi do?, what did the Dalai Lhama do? What did Nelson Mandela do? the answer is nothing, but bring voice to a dire situation, be it in Burma, tibet, or then apartheid south africa. President Obama has brought voice to a new beginning to diplomacy instead of naked aggression, as we saw demonstrated in the previous administration. Did Al Gore personally stop global warming? no, but he brought voice to an issue to long ignored. It is not in the total accomplishment that brings the rights to this award, but the voice that brings to the front burner issues that need to be addressed. I applaud President Obama, and know that it will not solve all the problems, but it will add credence to his call to continued diplomatic efforts.
Posted by: Joe | October 9, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Consumer confidence has fallen for six straight days. Just before last week’s report on unemployment, 32% said the economy was getting better. Now, just 26% hold that view while 49% say the economy is getting worse.
But thank God King Barack won a Nobel. Whew. We can rest easy now.
Back to the basketball court for more fun and games, hey Barack?
Posted by: The Obama Fraud | October 9, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
REPUBLICANS SAY : NO no no no not again we want him to fail!
Posted by: George | October 9, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
REPUBLICANS JUST GOT A SLAP IN THE FACE! OH no no no no we want him to fail and the country with him!
Posted by: George | October 9, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
How long do you suppose Obama has known that he was nominated? Did the possibility of getting this award enter into his decision about the missile defense system in Europe? Is this why he is dragging his feet about more troops in Afghanistan? Come on, even those of you who voted for Obama have to wonder. Maybe you like his decisions, but don’t you think they should be based on what is best for America?
Posted by: Susan | October 9, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Foreign leaders are congratulating Obama IE politics.
BUT….
The international press is not being so kind.
Wake up and smell the roses, the world does not change with hope but actions.
Lincoln ACTED
Gandi ACTED
Martin Luther King ACTED
Even Al Gore made a movie and won an Oscar.
Obama TALKS…. and talks… and talks.
His poll numbers are still dropping an it shows his glow DOES wear off.
The world will WAKE UP TOO.
Posted by: David from WI | October 9, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
America = land of equal opp NOT. Look at these posts. More like land of multiple standards and truth skewing, depending on who is in question. Even Germans have more respect for the US prez.
Posted by: NotAnAmerican | October 9, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
REPUBLICANS ARE NERVOUS! THEY WILL MAKE UP A NEW STORY TO MAKE OBAMA FAIL!
Posted by: JenniferfromARIZONA | October 9, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I USED TO BE A GOP VOTER AND I REGRET! THEY JUST WANT THE PRESIDENT TO FAIL!
Posted by: JenniferfromARIZONA | October 9, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The Obama con continues.
And the Kool Aids Kids keep moaning, cheering adoring the one who has accomplished nothing.
Keep sleeping, kids. We’ll wake up you up in 2010.
Posted by: Jas | October 9, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
REPUBLICANS SAY : “no no no no no not again WE WANT HIM TO FAIL IN THE HEALTH CARE REFORM. WE GOT PAID BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES FOR THAT! OH NO DON’T GIT HIM THIS PIZE!
Posted by: JenniferfromARIZONA | October 9, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Wow – 12 days in office as President and he was choosen to be the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize? What on earth did he do in 12 days?????? Am I missing something here. It’s not that we don’t want our President to get this award but really – don’t you have to earn it first. This is crazy.
Posted by: Michelle | October 9, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Without any significant achievement even progress on world peace he initiated, it is premature to award President Obama this year Nobel peace prize.
If I were he, will defer to accept this honor until some progress on the resolution on middle east crisis,war/fighting,world nuclear disarmament seen.
Posted by: hiko | October 9, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
REPUBLICANS SAYS : WE WANT MORE TROOPS !
WE WANT MORE WAR! WE DON’T CARE ABOUT USA WE CARE ABOUT OUR POCKET!
Posted by: JenniferfromARIZONA | October 9, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
SNL got it right with the parody of him not accomplishing any of his promises. His speechwriters deserve the Nobel Peace Award. If he has an ounce of integrity, he would not accept an award he did not deserve.
Posted by: Sue | October 9, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
“What did Pres Obama accomplish is 12 days to even be nominated, much less win a Nobel Peace Prize?”
He got Bush and the neocons out office. That did more for world peace than anything!
Posted by: Mike | October 9, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Unemployment approaching 20 percent.
Troops dying while Obama dithers.
Dollar sinking.
Deficit exploding.
But REJOICE, people! Our savior Obama has won a prize!!
mmmm, mmmm, mmmm.
This worship is a fools game, Kool Aid Kids, that is going to destroy America in the long run if left unchecked.
2010 and 2012 can’t come soon enough.
Posted by: HH | October 9, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Americans are very strange. Many hope this president will fail but when he – and America – gets this honor (recognizing the international stature of the US following the Bush disaster) they belittle it. No wonder TV evangelists and Rush are taking over the country!
Posted by: Musquash2 | October 9, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
YES, THE REPUBLICANS ARE THE ANTI CHRIST: THEY WANT JUST ONE THING MORE TROOPS! MORE TROOPS! MORE TROOPS!MORE WAR!
Posted by: Amanda | October 9, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
“The Norwegian Nobel Committee’s deadline for nominations was February 1, just 11 days after Obama’s inauguration. ” So he wins the (supposedly) prestigious award that is the highest honor for work toward peace….for working eleven days….and people said AIG did’nt deserve THEIR bonuses!!LOL
Posted by: dainmezron | October 9, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
What is with all of this negativity? I thought we were all Americans. I’m proud to be an American and to have another American president be honored with such an award. The slogan says “buy American”…I think we need to “support an American – our president”. One more thing black, white, or hispanic, President Obama was elected by the majority of the country, which if you haven’t notice is not all black.
Posted by: TxCowgirl | October 9, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Wouldnt it be unconstitutional for BO to accept this…..
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
Posted by: vet1973 | October 9, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Congratulations to President Obama on winning the Nobel!
He is loved by all humans and should be Emperor of the Earth, as well as a living god.
Wait, I take that last part back about emperor and living god. It would be nice for him to put a lightning bolt on Bin Laden though.
Posted by: D | October 9, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
If the President make a decission to send more troop to fight Al-quaida or continue to support war in other part of the world such as Iraq etc…
Should the Nobel Committee recalls the Nobel Peace Prize?
Posted by: DNCA | October 9, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Obama must feel sort of cheap right now. Almost feel bad for the guy.
Posted by: False Peace | October 9, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Let’s end this argument and agree that Obama didn’t earn the award and that other, more deserving nominees were overlooked in order to make a political statement. Why is that so hard for Democrats to swallow?
Posted by: Peso the dog | October 9, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
OK, let me understand what some of you seem to think. Even though many countries have lost respect for our country, they all like us because Obama is our president. Are we truly running a popularity contest? Do you think that there aren’t still people out there who want to kill Americans? It isn’t just the republicans who are questioning what is going on, Obama has lost a lot of support from independents (and even a few democrats) as well.
Posted by: Susan | October 9, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
The instant I saw it I thought it was some kind of April Fool’s joke. I still can’t believe it.
Posted by: Qwikness | October 9, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Oh I get it, we are all supposed to love Obama because he was elected our president. I wonder if you were making that same statement when Bush was our president.
Posted by: Susan | October 9, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Obama is not nearly as popular as the fawning Kool Aid Kids would like to believe.
Polling today =
Overall, 49% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance. Fifty percent now (50%) disapprove.
Posted by: Kyle | October 9, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
What a joke the Nobel Peace Prize!!! Now we get why he has held off sending those needed troops to Afghanistan. This committee needs to get a clue-if there is no one who deserves the prize then don’t give it.
Posted by: whogiveslife | October 9, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Well, what I don’t understand is that he was nominated after 11 days of being in office (what I heard). 11 days in office? What did he accomplish in 11 days? I guess being the 1st black president is an accomplishment, but for a Nobel Peace Prize. “Peace” what an ironic term in this country right now. And mostly over him. I guess if all he accomplishes is causing another civil war among the Americans will it be revoked?
Posted by: april | October 9, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Obama is a disgrace for accepting this award. He diminshes America with his continuing narcissism.
This fool has got to go. It begins with the 2010 elections.
Posted by: Lao | October 9, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Thomas Sowell in his 1995 book “The Vision of The Anointed, Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy” describes why the Euro-socialist Nobel committee would select a same minded socialist Pres. Obama, immediately after his election. These are the same Euro-socialists who gave this award to Yassir Arafat and Jimmy Carter. The Nobel committee decision is another clear attack on American values, just as the so called Community Reinvestment Act was an attack on the US financial system that within just nine years has caused a worldwide recession/depression. The European Noble committee subverts its own charter of rewarding accomplishment, taking funds away from the truly deserving, voting its approval of the election of a socialist US president. They court disaster and we are fools to abandon American principles of liberty and democracy for the illusions of undefined change.
Posted by: Abrazos | October 9, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
“The instant I saw it I thought it was some kind of April Fool’s joke. I still can’t believe it.”
The white house thought it was a joke too. I don’t understand why so many posters are so angry at the people who are as surprised as the white house was.
This is a joke and Obama doesn’t think he deserves it either.
I guess accepting an award he didn’t earn is the change he talked about.
So he will accept an award he doesn’t think he deserves.
Yes he can.
What a brave new Obama world we live in.
Posted by: David from WI | October 9, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
I’m getting the strange feeling that Republicans are feeling a little bit crabby about being voted into oblivion.
Posted by: Archie | October 9, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I suppose Neville Chamberlain should have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his “good intentions” in 1938. Or perhaps Germany’s Great Leader should have been considered that year?
This act today cheapens the true value of the award. What a farce!
Posted by: SilverEagle2002 | October 9, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I’m hearing a lot of sour grapes. And George– since when does winning a Nobel back fire? This is a ridiculous premise. The United States as a whole is being awarded for recognizing how much damage Mr. Bush did and thereby electing a President that whole heartedly wants to reverse this damage!
Posted by: John Beetle | October 9, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Patrik….the George fellow was Bill Clinton’s former communications director (and was pretty darn good at it). He has more political insight in his little pinky than 90% of the people running their mouths on TV and radio today. His job in the Clinton Administration was to assert how media coverage would affect perception of the President and how best to react (spin) events in Clinton’s favor…which is exactly what he does now.
Have you ever taken a look at Clinton’s historical approval ratings? Even most objective conservative pundits (if there is such a thing) would agree that he generally knows what he’s talking about.
Posted by: CJ | October 9, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
The GOP has hope.
Sarah Palin could win the Nobel prize for literature.
Posted by: doug | October 9, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Wow Nobel Prize for nine days work! awesome! I wonder what his prize will be when the dollar crashes!
Posted by: AlfonsoM | October 9, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Don’t necessarily disagree with the tactical assessment, but there was something disturbingly protean and obsequious about that first paragraph. “Perfect pitch. The President not only had to say he was humbled, he had to appear to mean it.”
Tactics & short-term gains aside, are there any reasons why one would actually feel humbled and slightly embarrassed? Are we to assume that if the writer were honored alongside Nelson Mandela, Elie Wiesel, Doctors w/o Borders, he’d feel entitled to let it go to his head? And any affectation of humility would be just that?
He shouldn’t have refused it. But hopefully any future “Nobel effect” extends beyond shock jocks and pollsters. (Too bad this prize doesn’t come with the ability to render Inhofe mute on the Senate floor.)
Posted by: anon | October 9, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Can anyone spell fraud? OBAMA
Posted by: Lawrence Brown | October 9, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Posted by: SilverEagle2002 | Oct 9, 2009 2:31:21 PM posted “what a farce”.
Please enlighten us. Is there something “wrong” with promoting peace?
I encourage you to read “Three Cups of Tea” by Greg Mortenson. This man developed successful techniques for fighting war in Afghanistan that are being adopted by the US military today – building schools, repairing wells, rebuilding a civil society to counteract extremism.
Surely you know there has been a positive evolution in technology and military strategies since the 1800s. Again I ask, what’s wrong promoting peace as part of our new strategy?
Posted by: Center One | October 9, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
i think all americans should be proud of this president who inspires not only amreicans but the entire world. i am proud to be an american and i am happy his mission of hope is being recognized.
wake up america we have a great one on our hands.
Posted by: marty | October 9, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
While the Nobel prizes in the sciences and arts do seem to be based on real merit, the peace prize is apparently subject to the political and social popular whims of the day.
This years America’s election of not only a black man but, even more important, a liberal’s liberal, must be rewarded.
Posted by: MizFW | October 9, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
BTW, THIS AWARD WAS GIVEN OUT BY PEOPLE IN ANOTHER COUNTRY. SO, WHY ARE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY ALL ROUSED UP OVER IT. YOU ALL DON’T GET ALL HEATED UP OVER THE MTV, VH1, BET, HIPHOP, EMMY’S, OSCAR AWARDS
Posted by: Jeff | October 9, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“I’m hearing a lot of sour grapes. And George– since when does winning a Nobel back fire?”
The UK Guardian might give you a fresh insight. Not exactly a right wing Obama hating website/paper.
They are more level headed then those voters that did vote for him.
They didn’t or couldn’t. Little different prescriptive and they have many concerns.
Posted by: David from WI | October 9, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
It is amazing to me that the rest of the world appreciates the impact this President of the United States has had, so much more than many here do! The comments I’ve seen from elsewhere state that the fact that he has given people all over the world the feeling that peace IN the world is possible makes it a good choice for this award. He has never given the impression that he is more deserving than anyone else, and knows the responsibility that even this award entails. Congratulations, Mr. President! I, for one, am proud of you and proud to be an American.
Posted by: Shelleyt | October 9, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
George be careful, do not question anything about Pres. Obama or you WILL be called un-american, racist and won’t get a call anymore from the White House early in the morning, or have those calls stopped?????
Posted by: Lizzie | October 9, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Congrats Obama…As an American I am proud that one of our own (American) recognize for his accomplishments! Being voted into the President of the United Stated is a big accomplishments period. For those who say he hasnt accomplish anything you are just not looking/unaware of his/dont care of his accomplishments. Taking on a huge task and trying to fix a mess is a huge task and it will never happen over night ESPECIALLY IN AMERICA. America has ALWAYS BEEN SLOW in progress and we are reminded of that with all the negative crap talk and all of the “no’s from the Republican party. Also the scare tactics and less information, education, and common sense. If you look in Americas history, slavery didnt end overnight, civil rights didnt come overnight, equal pay for women still has its struggles, healthcare, immigration has ALWAYS been an issue, glbt movement. Again all of these are social movements to our society that has taken some time. An elected term of presidency is for four years …let him do his job in four years and the next election will be determine his success. It is funny how other coutries can appreciate, respect, and award our sitting president. However, some Americans just simply hate a President that the majority of Americans put in office and believe he can get the job done. I guess the Americans with real jobs in management and a reality check knows that you cant turn a company and its culture around with the snap of your finger tip. Now imagine a democracy with a capitalist(money driven society) rumpage running America into the ground. It is not easy turning that around and if you think it will happen overnight….I have a bridge to sell ya!
Posted by: us citizen | October 9, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
is there peace in chicago ?
Posted by: whatpeace | October 9, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I hope Obama pays taxes on the $1 million—-atleast some good can come from it no matter how tiny.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 9, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
It is hard to find someone who did more to change the prospects for peace last year than Obama. His vision of solving problems from a platform of respect and mutual understanding has rightfully been acknowledged. As a result, new dialog has opened up with Russia, Iran, Pakistan, South American and African countries, the Mid-East, and more.
But more important than such specifics is the widespread attitude that what we have in common is more important than our ideological, cultural, or religious differences.
The fact that someone (or some people) nominated him in February is irrelevant since the Nobel committee most likely made its final decision this week. However, a world shift happened with Obama’s election.
The whole world was behind the U.S. after 9/11 but our divisive response squandered that unity. Now the world is behind Obama and his respectful vision of a world where being human is the more important than what divides us. It seems like a good moment to celebrate this achievement.
Posted by: Jeffrey | October 9, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
FROM GERMANY : GERMANS SUPPORT USA!BRAVO TO YOUR PRESIDENT
Posted by: Heike | Oct 9, 2009 1:36:29 PM
You forgot to say, germans overwelmingly voted for the right wing in the last election and dumped the left. With 50% unemployment, and more people on Harts4(welfare) and the rest who pay more than 50% in tax and trying to leave the country, America was once their destination, but now the are looking for other places, like Australia and New Zealand.
Posted by: Lizzie | October 9, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
It is so sad that the French, Germans, and Canadians are more supportive of the US and our president than many of us are. For shame! Can US citizens not just once get past partisan political drivel and stand united in their pride in this country?
Of course President Obama deserves the Nobel Prize. He is the first leader we’ve had in a long time who understands the importance of, and advocates for, cross-cultural awareness, respect, appreciation, and sensitivity.
I am embarrassed that so many of my fellow Americans exhibit a narrow-minded, ignorant, even xenophobic mindset vis-a-vis both domestic and foreign policies.
Posted by: Nancy | October 9, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
This is perhaps the most “politically motivated” award I have seen out of the Nobel Committee in the past 30 or so years. I am not questioning whether President Obama deserved it or not, as I am not qualified to make that determination.
What I will say, however, is that the timing of all of this is odd, premature, political, etc. Is the European community not injecting their wishes into American politics? Many would agree that they are. Finally since the early part of the Clinton administration have we turned the bulk of our attention to sorely needed domestic reform – that we now find the world grabbing at us (and the President, of course) demanding our attention.
If so, it would perhaps have been a bit more appropriate for President Obama to have turned down the award and said “perhaps at a later time.” By accepting this award, it puts the President in an awkward position regarding his actions in the world – Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, etc. It also puts him in an awkward position relative to his European counterparts (heads of state of German, Britain, France, etc.) – at a time when President Obama is currently more popular in these countries than the current leaders are.
I think President Obama would be the first one to admit that the Nobel committee would best have waited a few years. All this will do is add a few more gray hairs and an incredible tightrope for him to walk on the world political stage. Its not fair to the President – and not fair to this country.
Posted by: Jon F | October 9, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Hey Hey Hey is it so soon that we forgot the real news of the week…Tom Delay getting booted from SO YOU THINK YOU CAN DANCE? For all you nay sayers just wait till the Rush Limbaugh Aerobics series comes out on Blu-Ray. That will be the definitive “who deserves what” moment!
Posted by: Steve | October 9, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
George, I’m getting more and more disappointed in your “leanings”. You used to be unbiased. Now it seams you have critism only for President Obama. Unless you go back to your objective self, I will soon tire of your opinions.
Posted by: Cindy | October 9, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Yes, I think President Obama should have won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Peace obtained from power. Power obtained from peace is the American Mandate.
Our chance for peace in the world has been enhanced
The keywords being changing America’s image a concern of all the Americans that won the prize.
The Talban is sounding off because this lessens those who hold sympathy for them!
Humanism; opposed to what Americans were originally labeled!
Posted by: Roy Goins | October 9, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
All I can say is, “WoW!” There’s a list a mile long of folks who have already dedicated an entire lifetime to their Humanitarian efforts who get passed by for this honor year after year. Considering the names of past winners he now shares the honor with after only two weeks as President, anyone of us could qualify for a vote next time around.
Posted by: grimbillyandmandy | October 9, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
A Nobel Prize for Obama just proves that they can give it anyone and they have. They gave it to former president Jimmy Carter and Yasser Arafat. Two People who wnat to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. Obama has done nothing anything to deserve as he said.
Posted by: Herb A | October 9, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Optimism is the essence in him/
Broadminded views of democracy/
And true spirit of humanitarian ethics/
Merge in his unquestionable diplomacy/
A wind of change emanates from him/
Let us hope that an American President holding the Nobel Peace Prize will not indulge in any war or atrocities at least for the next three years. I think the Nobel committee might have taken a thought provoking decision by looking forward to a peaceful world in the offing. Now the Prez will think twice, unlike his predecessor, before he orders his military forces to show a war mongering reality show on someone’s land. And let us also hope that he will control his spy agencies from fingering the external affairs.
On the other hand, his intentions are good. And if the past offers some inspirations to move forward or some lessons to learn, we should take them with us for the present and for the future. Otherwise leave them behind forever. Obama might have gone through this. And he seems to be in the White House to remove some black spots from the minds of people at home and abroad. Optimism is the essence of his speech. Abraham Lincoln once told he had destroyed his enemies by making them friends. And his bold step helped eradicate slavery. Obama seems to follow him. Of course any outcome is not expected overnight. In politics, political opportunism is dangerous. Even if he and his like minded are sincerely on the move towards peace and tranquility, the hardliners from every part of the world await chances of their wrong steps .Religious interferences some times deviate the process of a good proposal or they come as stumbling blocks. People who are committed to the peace initiatives must be brave to take up all such challenges, if they really want to translate their vision. All the peace loving citizens of the world hope that the long standing conflicts may come one by one in the funeral queue with an epitaph.
Posted by: Prem Nizar Hameed | October 9, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Unfortuantely, while in the dentist’s office, the TV was tuned to Fox News. The hyperventilating over President Obamas’ being awarded the Nobel award for peace spoke volumes about the right wing Republican network.
I, myself, was surprised that the president was given this award so early in his presidency, but, to insult the presidents’ intentions or that of the Nobel Peace prize committee is so very, very small.
The president was very humble in accepting this award. In some respects, he truly deserves it for keeping his head and his cool while all around him, both the right and the left, just carp, carp, carp because he doesn’t do their bidding.
Maybe the folks in Oslo recognize the difference in tone from this administration that at least is reaching out to the rest of the world to reach some accord, and the previous administration who wanted to do it all alone, and to hell with anyone who dissented.
Posted by: findlayway | October 9, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
To read and take in the flood of opinions and criticisms is amazing… The man did not “run” for the Nobel Peace Prize. The committee clearly was sending out their message to the world by choosing him. To express outrage and call down shame on the man who has “accomplished nothing” as president is the true outrage. Give the man some space to breathe. He’s working on it. But no one is going see results in such a short time especially if that someone is president of these very troubled and divided states. Stop blaming and judging and trying to make news. Try to support change and participate in a positive way.
Posted by: Jo | October 9, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
they have to change the rules…..
Posted by: vmax14 | October 9, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
they have to change rules…..
Posted by: vmax14 | October 9, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
No this will not back-fire on the President resolve to do it right, he will do as he has alway done, his efforts will succeed—Once again the Republicans with all their efforts to undermine this President has fail.
Posted by: we'r1 | October 9, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Of course Bush would have been a better choice than O’Bama. As bad as everyone thinks he was, he did more good for Africa alone than O’Bama has done for ANYONE!
Posted by: M. Summer | October 9, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
They felt sorry for Obama on the olympic thing so lets give the idiot a prize, go europe.
Posted by: earl | October 9, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
As the headline read today in the E.U. Obama Wins Noble Peace Prize! WT* I think that says it all. Now post!
Posted by: lovingpolitics | October 9, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
To say this is too much, too soon…is an understatement. Personally, I can’t think of anyone deserving of the award, so when you don’t have any candidates, I suppose they went with someone who has spoken the most about peace…which President Obama has given more speeches internationally than anyone else. He has also thrown his country ‘under the bus’ more than any other leader and apologized more than any leader should, so rewarding an American President for weakening his countries standing in the world can only be seen as a positive for those that want what we have.
So, if he doesn’t achieve his goals for peace and other nations don’t reciprocate to his call for peace…will they take the award back?
Sorry, but talk is cheap. We need to see results before we just give away such awards. By selecting President Obama, the award has been severely cheapened.
Posted by: Gary | October 9, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Obama is getting credit from the Euro-socialists for his blame America Tour. He is spending our country into massive debt and devaluing the dollar in favor of a world currency. His policies have emboldened our enemies and made us less secure at home. He should have received the Fiedel Castro Prize for Anti-American activities not the Nobel.
Posted by: Jsck | October 9, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Well, Obama is not the undeserving idiot to get the Nobel award–Carter, Arafat, Gore got it to. It says more negative about the losers on the Nobel committee than Obama if that is possible.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 9, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
WELL, NORWAY IS A SOCIALIST COUNTRY, NORWAY NEVER WAS ABLE TO DEFEND ITSELF MUCH LESS STOP THE AGGRESSION OF EITHER OF THE 2 WORLD WARS, WAS OCCUPIED BY THE NAZI’S FROM 1940-1945, HAS JOINED NATO AND BEFRIENDED THE US FOR PROTECTION. GETS ITS “FREE” MONEY FROM THE EXPORT OF NATURAL GAS AND OIL FROM ITS NATURAL RESERVES, WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE SUPPORT OF its SOCIALISTIC LIFESTYLE. COMPARED TO THE UNITED STATES WHO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE PEOPLE AND DEMOCRACIES OF/IN THE WORLD BOTH MEN AND WOMEN. THE UNITED STATES JOINED AND THEN ENDED THE 1ST WORLD WAR, JOINED AND WON THE 2ND WORLD WAR, OTHERWISE NORWAY WOULD BE A GERMAN SPEAKING COUNTRY TODAY, AS WOULD MUCH OF EUROPE AND PERHAPS THE US, THE MIDDLE EAST WOULD LIKELY ALSO BE OCCUPIED BY GERMANY. SOUTH KOREA WOULD BE COMMUNIST, ALSO CHINA WAS DEFENDED BY THE US AGAINST JAPAN IN WORLD WAR 2, And PERHAPS CHINA WOULD BE JAPAN TODAY IF NOT FOR THE US. THE US ALSO AIDED THE RUSSIANS AGAINST GERMANY IN WW2, ATTEMPTED TO STOP COMMUNISM IN VIETNAM BUT POLITICALLY DECIDED STRATEGY INSTEAD OF MILITARILY DECIDED STRATEGY SCREWED THAT ONE UP. HELPED IRAN IN THE 1960-1970′S, HELPED IRAQ AGAINST IRAN IN THE 1980′S, HELPED KUWAIT AGAINST IRAQ IN THE 1990′S AND THE AUGUSTINIANS IN THE 1980′S DEFEAT THE RUSSIANS. LET’S NOT FORGET SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY IN THE MIDDLE EAST SURROUNDED BY WACO’S, AND OUR RELIEF EFFORTS AROUND THE GLOBE. WHAT COUNTRY IF ANY HAS HELPED ANY OTHER COUNTRY OR THE WORLD, IT’S STABILITY OR IT’S INHABITANT’S MORE THAN “US” THE UNITED STATES ALL OF THIS TAKING PLACE BEFORE THE “ACORN ASSISTED” ELECTION THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE IN 2008, UNFORTUNATELY IT APPEARS AS THOUGH THE NEW NORM IN THE WORLD IS THAT AWARDS ARE GIVEN TO THOSE NOT DESERVING FOR DEEDS NOT PERFORMED IT HAS BECOME VERY PERVERSE AND IT IS UNFORTUNATE. A CERTAIN LEVEL OT TARNISH HAS BEEN APPLIED TO THE NOBEL PRIZE WITH THIS LATEST PRESENTATION. I GUESS IT IS LIKE OUR DOLLAR WHICH IS ALSO WORTH LESS SINCE THE CURRENT RECIPIENT HAS BEEN IN OFFICE DOING HIS BEST TO COLLAPSE OUR WAY OF LIFE SO THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE BUT TO ACCEPT THE SOCIALIZATION OF THE UNITED STATES, IT IS AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HIS ADMISSION OF HIS NOT YET SUCCESSFUL INTEREST OF A SOCIALIST UNITED STATES.
Posted by: TRUTHFUL 1 | October 9, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Obama said he did not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize because he had done nothing to deserve the award. Does that mean that Norway gave Obama the award because they have found a new found belief in Affirmative Action?
Posted by: james | October 9, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
I am surprised how people like George can not think.
George, the world doeanot think like you American. The Nobel commity chose him because he has the courage to try to break away from the Rambo philosophy of you american and think about peace.
simple
Posted by: leche | October 9, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Americans dont realize that the world think different from them.
Then world think about peace and harmony american think but war war and segregation.
Posted by: leche | October 9, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Why is so difficult to see all respect United States get from the World. It seems that people here don’t realy care about the World. This World has changed since Obama took this office. Look at middle east, people are seriously want to sit down and solve these problems now. Look at Iran issue, the government of Iran promised to let UN inspect their nuclear sites. Look at Iraq, we see less violences now. I am sure this is a start of good things to come. Why we can not support all these and see the potential of solving these serious world problems. Yes all credits should go to Obama. Obama leads this country the way he way he was raised and people around him all this time. His background is unlike any other Presidents and this is disrespect to all Africans. The most diminishing factors in all this is how people don’t want to accept diversity from other origins. Obama is great leader and no matter what few narrow minded people think. It is amazing even how so called wise people remained quite about these. The media have to do better job, Report what you want people fill about you and be human.
Posted by: ed | October 9, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
The following remarks that I found are not comedy, but are true reflections on the ridiculous award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Obama. The fact that the nomination was made within two weeks of his becoming president makes this as much of a cult statement as any other “Hollywood” idol contest. This and the Al Gore award take all credibility from the Nobel committee.
Ezra Klein: Obama also awarded Nobel prize in chemistry. “He’s just got great chemistry,” says Nobel Committee.
Adam Bromberg, CRC: Nobel Prize Committee must be staffed by out of work comedy writers.
Kristina Hernandez, CRC: It was the Beer Summit that put Obama over the edge.
Posted by: Carol Z | October 9, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
I think Pres. certainlydeserved the Nobel Peace Award. In his short term in office, he has accomplished more than Pres. Bush did in 8 yrs. in the White House.
We
are lucky to have such a great president…..Who has the ability to talk to the people without reading from cue cards.
Posted by: alice | October 10, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
No, I do not think Obama deserves a Nobel Peace prize. The fact that it is under such debate is evidence enough that he does not. He, himself, even admits it! So why accept it? He has done nothing (yet) to deserve this prestigious award. Even Bill Clinton has done more for peace this year than Obama! How can ANYONE say Obama deserves it when Ghandi hasn’t even won it!? Talk is cheap folks! And now I guess a Nobel Peace Prize is too!
Posted by: MW | October 10, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize is called God’s grace. None of us deserve much of what we have and what we get. But I love it when God’s grace
intervenes and delivers to a person what we may think is undeserved. When will we realize that we can disrespect the office of president all we want, but when God wants to move in a person’s life, He DOES WHATEVER HE WANTS TO DO AND NOBODY CAN STOP HIM! Keep talking Rush, and all Americans who disrespect the authority set over us by God! I love it when God starts fighting battles and calling the shots that we think we can call!! Let’s face it folks, We are not controlling diddly
squat!!! TO GOD BE THE GLORY!! I LOVE IT WHEN HE BRINGS HIS PLAN TO FRUITION!!!
Posted by: Praising God | October 10, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
President Obama, CONGRATULATIONS! This is divine, a mark of great destiny.Please, remain humble. Urgliness and hatered will continue to raise it’s ugly head. When all is said and done, after your two terms, history will judge you as one of the greatest leaders the world has ever had. Keep faith and remain FOCUSED.Our prayes are with you and your beloved family.
Posted by: Philobed | October 10, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Congratulations to President Obama! I, an American, am proud to have a leader who has put the United States back in the world map. The outside world sees what Americans inside of the country do not want to see. They only see COLOR.
Posted by: Laura | October 10, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Barack getting the award shows how corrupt and misguide the committee is. It a perfect example how leftist think that peace is achieved through weakness. Barack’s action has and will continue to make the would less safe. I just hope his missteps does not kill millions of people like appeasers have in the past. Of course the left in past sins have killed millions or stood by as millions were killed in the past I do not expect Baracks or the Nobel committee, to be any different. After all, so far Barack has not found a leftist dictator that he does not like.
Posted by: fred | October 10, 2009, 2:48 am 2:48 am
When our soldier’s come home, We will see Peace. When the homeland is safe, We will feel Noble. Whe our nation is recognized as one, We will have the prize.
A comment by an unemployed taxpayer.
Posted by: marcie parler | October 10, 2009, 3:08 am 3:08 am
I think He truly deserves it he is the best president we ever had and to all those who don’t agree then you need to give your heart to God so you can start praying for him.
Posted by: David Armstrong | October 10, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am
Ridiculous. Obummer is waaay out of his league. The media in concert with big money NAU globalists put this puppet in office. Now the Nobel Peace Prize. O.M.G. NO. Just no.
Posted by: NopeNotJealous | October 10, 2009, 3:18 am 3:18 am
Yes Obama should have won the Nobel Peace Prize! If he was a white man the question would be ask. We never question the big mess Bush left this country in. No country respect th United States, now they believe in us again. Get with the program!
Posted by: Bobbie Moore | October 10, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am
I’m afraid, this is like giving a newborn baby with long legs the Olympic gold-medal in 100 m hurdles – just because it looks like s/he has the means for winning it.
With due respect: Mr. Obama has still failed to resolve some of the most shameful things he, admitedly, inherited from his criiminally insane predecessor.
And he has still failed to put acts behind his words in Middle-East –
suggestion: stop American money-flow to Israel unless 1967 borders are re-established and the land a water disputes resolved – under UN control!
If he is willing to do that – THEN he may deserve the prize.
Posted by: joboost | October 10, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am
Good analogy about the Colts/Steelers game. It made a lot of sense and a good way of doing it. Trouble is many think with their feelings and not with sense.
We need to stop the labeling and just read more think more and then speak.
Wonder how that would be be, thinking before speaking.
Posted by: SH | October 10, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am
A man authorizes more HELLFIRE missile strikes on Pakistani and Afghani villages than his predecessor, and receives a peace prize? This smacks of political manipulation and an influence campaign by elitist, non-Americans to force our President into a narrow decision lane. At least it is a gentler influence campaign than the Madrid train bombings, which forced change to the outcome of the Spanish elections and the untimely withdrawal of Spanish forces from involvement in Iraq. Anybody check to see if Al-Qa’ida or the Taliban had infiltrated the NPP selection committee?
Posted by: K. Daraa | October 10, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
The citizens of the United States embarrass me by begrudging our own president this award. For eight years we have been the laughing stock of the entire world–and now continue to be. I guess no matter how outstanding our president, we still cannot shake loose the shackles of delusion and derision. We had rather laugh at one man’s hope for peace than look inside ourselves for the empty hole which once was filled with the same. Do not ask yourself what Obama has done to deserve this; ask what you, yourself, can do to regain the God-given gift you have lost. For it is only in our hope that we will be saved.
Posted by: Mary | October 10, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Of course the “Right-whiners” are complaining now…after 8 years, President Bush won “the shoes”, and after only 9 months President Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize….LMAO!
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | October 10, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Since Obama himself realizes that he doesn’t deserve the award it would make sense for him to decline to accept it. Who knows, maybe that would encourage the lunatic leftists on the Nobel committee to make more careful choices in the future. The monetary award has no value since it will cost the President more to go there than the award is worth and besides, who would want to be in the company of Jimmy Carter and Al Gore ?
Posted by: Ron | October 10, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
The most homest response on this issue was from his daughter, Malia, “Daddy, you won the Nobel Peace Prize, and it is Bo’s birthday.” Can we expect that he will awarded this year’s Heisman trophy? Why not an honorary Oscar for lifetime achievement?
Posted by: James | October 10, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
I am amazed at how many Rush Limbaugh’s are out there. Shame on you for bashing the President’s honor. If one of you were so honored would you accept or give it back. I am certain it would not be the latter. Kay.
Posted by: kay | October 10, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Of course President Obama doesn’t deserve the Nobel Peace Prize since he hasn’t accomplished anything. I don’t blame the president for being embarrassed for receiving the award. The Europeans are just thilled at the prospect that the U.S.A. has moved into a Western European, extreme, leftward direction that believes in appeasement over confrontation.
Posted by: Barry | October 10, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Does anybody foresee the current Nobel Peace prize awarded to president Barack Obama an indication of handling IRAN on a better level?
Posted by: Arsalan Tayyab | October 10, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
On October 10, 2003, Ebadi was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for her significant and pioneering efforts for democracy and human rights, especially women’s, children’s, and refugee rights. She was the first ever Iranian, the first Shia Muslim, and the first Muslim woman to have received the prize.—-and yet many in this country want to go over there and kill innocent people out of fear..
Posted by: bibob | October 10, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
George,
Why don’t you ask the average American
that is complaining who the last 5
people were that received the Award.
Bet NONE can tell you..
Posted by: bibob | October 10, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Once again, the reactions to stories like this show us what is wrong with America. Our nation is so divided that we not only question the reasoning of those that differ from us, we reduce ourselves to openly criticizing each other. Both the President and Mr. McCain question the timing of the award, because they know that no one can accurately predict the future. Yes, Mr. Obama projects a lot of hope, but he has all of congress to move in order to get anything done. Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain are trying to work together in an unprecedented fashion for former rivals, in an attempt to bridge the gaps in our society, but they are failing because “We the People” refuse to let them succeed.
We need to start looking at the arguments of those on the other side and incorporating their concerns into a comprehensive move forward, or we will continue to slide backwards into civil unrest.
Posted by: Marc | October 11, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am
Glad to see Michael Steele’s RNC and its cabal are keeping their promise of differing with Obama’s policies rather than attacking personalities. Fat Chance.
Posted by: Swami | October 11, 2009, 7:40 am 7:40 am
Nice to see Obama joining the ranks of past winners such as Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and Yassir Arafat….
Posted by: TxBoB | October 11, 2009, 7:42 am 7:42 am
From Germany. I think it’s just super. The Commitees is completely free in his decision. President Obama stands for the future. Congratulations to the U.S..
Posted by: Juergen | October 11, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am
George W bush and republicans deserved the Nobel prize, they acomplished a lot, started two wars, bankrupted home, make the world hate us for being so fanatic religious, health care pices skyrocketing oh my God now i realize that they did more than Obama to be awarded.LOL
Posted by: Arturo | October 11, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
The question is did he accept it? If not, why all the slamming of the guy? As for nothing accomplished, are you serious? I guess if you try hard to not see something, then most certainly you won’t. The power of the mind and wasted energy of prejudiced hearts. Have a blessed day everyone!
Posted by: Darryl | October 12, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am