By Dotcomabc

Oct 11, 2009 12:18pm

President Obama Repeats Promises to Gay and Lesbian Community

At St. John's church this morning, President Obama heard a sermon in which the pastor said, “Our God demands boldness from us.”

The sermon came just hours after President Obama delivered a speech to a gala benefiting the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights organization. Obama has been criticized for being insufficiently bold on concrete actions he will take to fulfill campaign promises regarding gay and lesbian rights issues.

"I'm here with a simple message: I'm here with you in that fight," President Obama told roughly 3,000 attendees of the $250-a-seat black-tie dinner at the Washington Convention Center. "For even as we face extraordinary challenges as a nation, we cannot and we will not put aside issues of basic equality."

The president said that "nobody in America should be fired because they're gay, despite doing a great job and meeting their responsibilities. It's not fair, it's not right. We're going to put a stop to it. And it's for this reason if any of my nominees are attacked not for what they believe but for who they are, I will not waver in my support because I will not waver in my commitment to ending discrimination in all its forms.

"Do not doubt [that’s] the direction we are headed and the destination we will reach," President Obama said. "We have made progress, and we will make more."

"I thought it was a forcefully delivered argument for full equality, but very slim on the details," said attendee Richard Socarides, a former special assistant to President Clinton.

By now in Obama's presidency "there should be more," Socarides said.

HRC president Joe Solmonese, however, lauded that "President Obama told LGBT Americans that his commitment to ending discrimination in the military, in the workplace and for loving couples and their families is “unwavering.”  He made it crystal clear that he is our strongest ally in this fight, that he understands and, in fact, encourages our activism and our voice even when we’re impatient with the pace of change.

 “But these remarks weren’t just for us,” Solmonese said. “They were directed to all Americans who share his dream and ours of a country where no one is denied their basic rights, in which all of us are free to live and love as we see fit.”

Solmonese called it "a historic night when we felt the full embrace and commitment of the president of the United States. It’s simply unprecedented."

President Obama didn't make any new proposals or offer any timelines for when he would enact old ones.

Though breaking news headlines from other media outlets proclaimed that President Obama Saturday night pledged to end the "don't ask-don't tell" ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the US military — "I will end 'don't ask-don't tell,’” he said to a standing ovation — that pledge is almost 2 years old.

Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which supports overturning the policy, said in a statement that "an opportunity was missed" in the president's speech since "the President did not outline a timeline and specifics for repeal. The 65,000 gay and lesbian service members–who put their lives on the line and who remain impatient with the pace of progress–deserve to know when their commander in chief and Congress plan on getting rid of this law."

On NBC's “Meet the Press” Sunday, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, backed the president's policy and deliberativeness, saying the policy needs to be overturned "with thoughtfulness and with care and with a buy-in from the military."

In November 2007, President Obama said, "America is ready to get rid of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. All that is required is leadership."

So far, however, many gay and lesbian rights activists have been disappointed by what they see as lack of leadership on these issues, if not downright hypocrisy.

In June the Obama Justice Department filed a brief in support of the Defense of Marriage Act, which upset gays and lesbians by seeming to compare the illegitimacy of same-sex couples to that of incestuous couples.

And an official with the Log Cabin Republicans, a GOP gay and lesbian rights group, last night questioned how the president could promise to repeal "don't ask-don't tell" while the Obama Justice Department fights the organization's lawsuit challenging it on behalf of Alexander Nicholson, a former U.S. Army Human Intelligence Collector who speaks multiple languages, who was discharged six months after 9/11 because he's gay.

The president acknowledged criticism in his speech. "I appreciate that many of you don't believe progress has come fast enough," Obama said. "I greatly appreciate the support I've received from many in this room. I also appreciate that many of you don't believe that progress has come fast enough. I want to be honest about that because it's important to be honest amongst friends."

Last night President Obama referenced his presidential memoranda from June in which he extended some benefits — though not health, retirement, or survivor benefits — to the same-sex partners of federal employees.

Several gay writers were quite critical of the speech. Andrew Sullivan called much of the speech "campaign boilerplate. This speech could have been made – and was made – a year ago." Sullivan said Obama's "major achievement – the one thing he has actually done – is invite gay families to the Easter Egg Roll” at the White House.

Of the president's remarks that he'd called on Congress to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages from other states, Sullivan wrote, "Does he think we're fools? He has done nothing to advance this."

Wrote Dan Savage, "Imagine all the wonderful things this guy is going to accomplish if he ever actually gets elected president. In other words: sorry, folks, nothing new to see here. Pledges, promises, excuses. Lip service."

President Obama pledged last night that "You will see a time in which we as a nation finally recognize relationships between two men or two women as just as real and admirable as relationships between a man and a woman."

Of this, John Aravosis, the editor of AMERICAblog.com, wrote, "The president claimed that he's for treating gay couples just like married couples. Then why is he against letting gay couples marry?" He concluded, "All in all, the evening was a disappointment, but not unexpected. President Obama doesn't do controversy, and we, my friends, are controversy. So, the bad blood between this administration and the gay community will remain, and continue to worsen. It's unfortunate, but at some point you have to have enough dignity to say enough is enough. The Obama administration doesn't respect our community, and doesn't respect the seriousness of our cause. It's our job to hold them accountable. And we will."

Conservative critics assailed President Obama even talking to the group. Family Research Council President Tony Perkins called "shocking … the radical cultural changes that the President promised to this audience."

"What the President neglected to mention was that all of this will be forced on the American people who in the last election gave the President a mandate to fix the economy," Perkins said, "not enact radical social policy changes such as allowing homosexuals to serve in the military."

Special guests at the dinner included Lady Gaga and cast members from the Fox television show “Glee.”

- jpt

User Comments

How can Obama be such a fierce advocate for gays and still not have the guts to support gay marriage.
He is no different really than many in the GOP–many of them support civil unions and want DADT repealed.
Obama once supported gay marriage in the 90′s. As he rose the political ladder he flip flopped.
Why do gays give him a pass on that?
He doesn’t have the backbone to make hard political decisions.

Posted by: ollie | October 11, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Obama will get to DADT once he is safely re-elected.
Which means it might not happen.
The LGBT is naive to believe he will do anything that controversial before 2012.
I hope they enjoy the bones Obama tosses them.
He knows they have no place else to go.

Posted by: kyle | October 11, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Obama could have signed an executive order to stop the firing of gays in the military–it would have taken less time then a round of golf or datenight in NYC.
Obama has his priorities you know.

Posted by: tyler | October 11, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

When is Obama going to prove how bold he really is.
Announce that he is for gay marriage again like he was many years ago.
Go into the black churches and lecture them about their bigotry toward gay people.
Can’t see that happening.

Posted by: millie | October 11, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Careful what you wish for… DADT is one of the obstacles for reinstating the draft.

Posted by: LC | October 11, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

As a female who has served in our military the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy is BEST FOR EVERYONE. Military life is different. Living arrangements and duties are different than normal lives. I did not need to know what your sex was nor did I want to in order to serve my country. This political agenda is wrong for the military. Stop making it more than it is.

Posted by: Colleen | October 11, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

The British Army allowed gay and lesbian soldiers to serve years ago. The Brits have trained one of the most formidable armed forces in the world so it idiotic to suggest that the USA can’t do likewise. It’s only a matter of time and frankly it will only improve our combat readiness.

Posted by: oliphant | October 11, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

BO is REAL good at making promises… hehehehe….

Posted by: Vet1973 | October 11, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

So BO WHEN are you going to pretend t push this issue…… oh yeah…. AFTER you get re-elected…. MAYBE

Posted by: Vet1973 | October 11, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

“Repeats Promises”….. this is kind of like a man who keeps cheating on his wife……. and she keeps falling for it………….

Posted by: Vet1973 | October 11, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Obama is such a bold Commander in Chief and such a self-proclaimed “fierce advocate” for gays that he uses Congress as a cover for his lack of leadership and lack of courage.
If he cares so much about gays in the military he could sign an immediate executive order to stop DADT.
But like health care which Obama dumped in the laps of Congress–he passes the DADT buck to Congress.
Obama is not a “fierce” anything.
It’s time the gay community wakes up to that fact like the rest of the world has.

Posted by: lily | October 11, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Obama is going to drag his feet until after 2010 when he loses the supermajority.
Then he won’t be responsible for the failure of repealing DOMA and DADT.
Wake up LGBT!!!
Obama needs your money and your votes.
He uses you like he uses everyone.

Posted by: hank | October 11, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

What kind of respected Nobel Peace Prize winner (hee heee hee) is against gay marriage?
Doesn’t make sense…

Posted by: pami | October 11, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

How do Obama’s Hollywood peeps justify him not supporting gay marriage or immediately stopping the firing of gays in the military?
They don’t have the guts to publically call him out.
Obama can stall with DADT but why doesn’t the cool, progressive,bold, Nobel winning president support gay marriage?
What’s he afraid of?

Posted by: lanny | October 11, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Obama turns his back on his base AGAIN… And they come crawling back to him like a battered wife… PATHETIC!!!

Posted by: jafo | October 11, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Going slow on this is a simple matter of respect for our military. Repealing needs to be done, it is the right thing to do, but it is asking much of our military culture to accept it and I appreciate Obama is not being cavalier about it. At this point, the military has seen that eight years of Republican control didn’t change the movement DADT started towards integration and they should be ready to accept it. But that doesn’t mean their concerns should be brushed aside with the same quick action as Obama struck the Bush Administration’s procedures opposing the Freedom of Information act.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“Obama is such a bold Commander in Chief and such a self-proclaimed “fierce advocate” for gays that he uses Congress as a cover for his lack of leadership and lack of courage.

But like health care which Obama dumped in the laps of Congress–he passes the DADT buck to Congress.”
lily | Oct 11, 2009 1:20:19 PM
Heaven forbid, he’s letting the representatives of the People in Congress make the laws. It’s almost like he read the Constitution or something – doesn’t he know that he’s the decider and should just go from the gut and stay the course?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

“Obama turns his back on his base AGAIN… And they come crawling back to him like a battered wife… PATHETIC!!!”
jafo | Oct 11, 2009 1:35:16 PM
Nowhere near as bad as the ‘small government fiscal conservatives’ who lined up for Bush in 2004…

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Obama lies to EVERYONE. I can’t believe any were so dumb as to fall for his empty words.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 11, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

“Going slow on this is a simple matter of respect for our military.”
So this will take more than 25 minutes?

Posted by: .223 | October 11, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

He is committed to stringing folks
along. If he was really committed the executive order would be signed and the ink would have been dry before the dinner. I am not a supporter of homoseuality but as a retiree from the military I have served with some gay military members who were good and took pride in what they did and signed on to do the job. It is time to end the dont tell dont ask BS Mr. President. Just Do it dont throw the gay military members under the bus just to sting them along to get votes.

Posted by: S Haywood | October 11, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

The Don’t Ask. Don’t tell policy is plain out wrong. We have gay and lesbian troops already serving in our military just like every other country. We choose to make them serve in the dark as lesser beings. Some of which has been killed in combat and never got to live their lives to their fullest. It they have the courage to serve our country then we should do what the army teaches which is be all they can be. That includes their right to live their lives with whom they choose. I served 12 years in the military and was gay. I got out because I no longer had to passion to risk my life for an organization that wanted me to live a lie.

Posted by: Jay | October 11, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Promises promises…
I’m guessing sometime in 2012, probably after Nov4th, Obama will suddenly decide he is for gay marriage.

Posted by: kyle | October 11, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I have a nephew (4th generation military) serving in the army. I know how hard their jobs are; I know the sacrifices they are making.
As for gays in the military —
As that very conservative Republican from Arizona Barry Goldwater once said:
you don’t have to be straight to shoot straight.”
Really, people need to get a grip on reality.
We are in the midst of fighting two wars, and people are against gays in the military?
Sorry.
But if gays are willing to put their lives on the line for this country, who are we to say no?
Thank God they are willing to risk their lives in defense of America.
ARE YOU???

Posted by: abby | October 11, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Obama is going slow on DADT to show respect for the military?
Like leaving our troops stranded in Afghanistan while Obama tries to make up his mind whether to send more support or get them out?
Obama is avoiding DADT because it is controversial.
He can’t let anything else jeopardize his Obamacare legacy.
Everything else is on the back burner even our troops.

Posted by: larry | October 11, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

While the President’s ratings have moved little since he won the Nobel Peace Prize, skepticism about the Nobel selection process has grown . Fifty-eight percent (58%) now see politics in the process, up from 40% a year ago.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

He’s going to repeal DADT one day.
Like Obama and Gibbs love to say–their plate is full.
In the meantime LGBT people, please continue to send money and stick around to vote in 2010 and 2012.
Your money is good enough but Obama thinks marriage should be between a man and a woman. What a fierce advocate.

Posted by: lily | October 11, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Overall, 49% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance. Fifty-one percent now (51%) disapprove.
At least 60% of the five members of a Norwegisn committee approve.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

He’s the president.
He could immediately stop gays from getting kicked out of the military.
Then try to repeal DADT later.
Most gays know that–which is why many are losing patience.

Posted by: max | October 11, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

It’s just like when Bush claimed he was going to protect America from terrorists prior to 911.

Posted by: Tor | October 11, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Tired of the tslk in many aspects and no action. The democratic party might think the are in the drivers seat but with all the Americans hurting in their wallet and losing their homes and The war in Afghanistan up for review LOL we are in a big mess. I am so tired up the promises being empty when it comes time to see if they were done. Unless America is just blind and enjoys the spiral we are in even when it affects me a new change needs to come to Washington next month. This is absolutely ridiculous. Don’t promise do it or don’t then say what you need to say. One tired employed worker here and tired of watching my neighbors lose their homes and businesses. It is bad when you go to the grocery store and see the sheer number of people who are homeless or begging for money for food. Even our state and of all things the Federal Government is now laying off people. My goodness.

Posted by: Steve | October 11, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Just add the LGBT community to the long list of people duped by Obama.
I’m sure the CEO’s, unions, lawyers, Phrma, and other special interests are
very happy.

Posted by: kyle | October 11, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“Going slow on this is a simple matter of respect for our military.”
So this will take more than 25 minutes?”
.223 | Oct 11, 2009 1:49:02 PM
? Meanwhile, back in reality, it has obviously taken longer than 9 months.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“Like leaving our troops stranded in Afghanistan while Obama tries to make up his mind whether to send more support or get them out?”
larry | Oct 11, 2009 2:03:00 PM
Since Obama has taken office he has increased the number of troops in Afghanistan by 50%, continued the increase in drone strikes (including in Pakistan, which he was mocked for suggesting during the campaign – until the Bush administration saw the wisdom in it and began doing it), and fired the current general to put in place a new strategy (a somewhat unprecedented removal). I suppose in Republican fantasy land that is “leaving our troops stranded.”
For better or worse, Obama has given Afghanistan a great deal of attention and support.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Jhw, I suggest you go look at the MANY RACIST HATEFUL RANTS OF REVEREND WRIGHT IN HIS CHURCH—SO PROUD OF HIS BEHAVIOR HE TAPED HIS OWN NONSENSE WITH HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF HIS SUPPORTERS SCREAMING THEIR SUPPORT IN THE BACKGROUND. Hateful doesn’t even to begin to describe these huge number of bigots (mostly black) screaming their support of their #1 bigot.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 11, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

“Overall, 49% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance. Fifty-one percent now (51%) disapprove.”
Fascist Hyena | Oct 11, 2009 2:14:47 PM
So even with the worst recession since the depression, two hot wars that have dragged on for years, and months licking the third rail of healthcare reform, Obama has higher approval ratings than Clinton and about on par with Reagan at this point in their tenures. Wow. I’m sure he’ll take that.
(Although as a minor point, how do you define “voter” in a non-election year? Or more specifically – how does Rasmussen? No one knows, that’s their little black box adjustment they don’t like to talk about.)

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

“Jhw, I suggest you go look at the MANY RACIST HATEFUL RANTS OF REVEREND WRIGHT IN HIS CHURCH”
PotatoeGater22 | Oct 11, 2009 2:34:15 PM
I have. Have you actually listened to some of them IN CONTEXT, or just the little snippets? Wright is a jerk who subscribes to absurd conspiracy theories, but while I don’t like him I’m not going to condemn a US Marine for that. And neither do all the white folks who sat in his pews (you did actually watch a few of those vids right – not just the snippets fed you by the right wing?).

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Do we really want outwardly gay or lesbian soldiers in the bunk next to straight soldiers? At least the article did not write the phrase “gay rights advocate”. The word rights presupposes that the action is a a basic human right. Most of the basic religions of the world have not accepted this type of behavior.

Posted by: merchantilist | October 11, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Gee, we’ve got a lot of Rock Stars and very few people who are considering the legal side of the topic.
The simplest question is going to be about what kind of laws will be made and enforced with gays openly serving and demanding quotas in the workplace.
This is going to cost more than George Bush’s wars to get things under control once the door is opened. Watch and see.
Do you have men and women sharing showers and housing in the military? No. ….and for good reason. But Barak offered up the self-esteem of our troops in order to avoid a public confrontation with obsessive-compulsives, and that issue will now be more important than life itself to the liberals until until our entire system of law is designed around a liberal aristocracy isolated from the public by alternating use of gays and goons to shut the people up.
It will be ugly but you know, we got the government we deserve.

Posted by: Greg | October 11, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

How does everyones preference increase our readiness? No I do not remember that during our training that preference had anything to do with my training. So why then do I need to know what your preference is?

Posted by: CC | October 11, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“The simplest question is going to be about what kind of laws will be made and enforced with gays openly serving and demanding quotas in the workplace.”
Greg | Oct 11, 2009 2:51:16 PM
Demanding quotas? What scary fantasy land do you live in? Gays have been openly serving in the private workplace for years with no more problems than anyone else.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Even gays and lesbians who serve in the military and put their lives on the line don’t have equal rights. Very sad side of our nation.

Posted by: agnosticsocialist | October 11, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

More haste, less speed. Fools rush in, etc. etc. Kudos to Obama for deliberating on important issues.
The average do not understand the actions/perspectives of the brilliant.

Posted by: SundaySyndrome | October 11, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

-Even gays and lesbians who serve in the military and put their lives on the line don’t have equal rights. Very sad side of our nation.-
Don’t be so down. Look how quickly Guantanamo was closed.

Posted by: Be happy | October 11, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

A Military life and workplace is different than a civilians. How often do multiple civilians live in the same tent bunkhouse, foxhole? Military do on a regular basis. In order to keep order noone needs to know what your interests are. It makes for a very uncomfortable circumstance.

Posted by: CC | October 11, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

While I realize that many gay and lesbian activists are disappointed, and I don’t blame them or begrudge their disappointment, I seriously think a little perspective is in order. I seek equal rights for all citizens, too. But when I look back at the Bush and Clinton admins, I do see progress that we shouldn’t just sweep under the rug or minimize. IMHO, President Obama, his cabinet and his admin, alongside some Dems in Congress, are moving on several fronts, doing their best to fix a wide range of ills, many of which border on catastrophe– and they are criticized on nearly every front for moving either too slowly and deliberately, or too quickly.
So what have past Presidents done in regards to gay and lesbian rights? Well, the Bush administration nearly declared open war on the gay community–Bush threw himself and his office squarely behind FMA and his Justice department refused to hire and actually fired gays and lesbians or anyone who had any ties to organizations that might associate with gays and lesbians. Prior to Bush, Clinton signed DADT and DOMA. Now, we have a President who campaigned on and has stated repeatedly that he supports gay and lesbian rights and will work to end DADT and DOMA. He also went to the HRC, took the podium, and advocated on behalf of the cause in front of the entire nation, in an effort to win over hearts and minds, IMHO, and it was televised on C-SPAN. That actually IS a big deal, whether or not one thought the speech did or did not do or say enough. We’re not even at the one-year mark, folks.

Posted by: Alyson | October 11, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

-Now, we have a President who campaigned on and has stated repeatedly that he supports gay and lesbian rights and will work to end DADT and DOMA.-
Campaigning and stating: wash, rinse and repeat…He could just you know, end it. He is the CINC, or so I’m told.

Posted by: Any Day Now | October 11, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

“Jhw, I suggest you go look at the MANY RACIST HATEFUL RANTS OF REVEREND WRIGHT IN HIS CHURCH”
PotatoeGater22 | Oct 11, 2009 2:34:15 PM
I have. Have you actually listened to some of them IN CONTEXT, or just the little snippets? Wright is a jerk who subscribes to absurd conspiracy theories, but while I don’t like him I’m not going to condemn a US Marine for that. And neither do all the white folks who sat in his pews (you did actually watch a few of those vids right – not just the snippets fed you by the right wing?).
Posted by: jhw539 | Oct 11, 2009 2:39:46 PM
*** I have no idea why the potatoe decided to bring up Reverend Wright, but I agree with jhw’s take– and I can add that since I live in Chitown and have friends who go to that church, I’ve been there, and I was welcomed, and I didn’t feel discriminated against. I’ve also shook Rev. Wright’s hand (at a baptism) and while he is of a certain age and school of thought and is provocative and seems to subscribe to some out-there theories , you know, he smiled and was nice. That doesn’t mean I agree with him, or defend him– but I think the church gets a really bad rap that it doesn’t deserve, as does all black theology The choir is amazing– and I’ve gone back just for that. And the church has done amazing outreach in the community. Here most LGBT defend Reverend Wright as he welcomed gays and lesbians into the church and Trinity had one of Chicago’s first church-run HIV/AIDS ministries. Toward the end of 2007, Wright voiced his opposition and disgust of anti-gay violence in a sermon following news of the murder of Trinity’s openly gay choir director Donald Young. People are complex.

Posted by: Alyson | October 11, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

He could just you know, end it. He is the CINC, or so I’m told.
Posted by: Any Day Now | Oct 11, 2009 4:09:39 PM
Without pushback or anyone getting hurt, with full buy-in from the military and Congress? And you live in which galaxy??

Posted by: Alyson | October 11, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Most of the basic religions of the world have not accepted this type of behavior.
Posted by: merchantilist | Oct 11, 2009 2:49:43 PM
***
You may not have ever visited here but we believe in the separation of church and state, and the pursuit of happiness. Some religions, and states, deny women equal rights, too. And some subscribe to a favored or chosen group of people or a caste system.

Posted by: Alyson | October 11, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

As a female, would you want a guy to watch you while you shower or undress? Probably not. As a female, would you want another female with the same thoughts in mind watching you shower or undress? Again, probably not. Now imagine being away from home for months at a time with no opportunity for a sexual outlet. Now the tension is heightened in those situations of showering and undressing. Of course it’s the same thing for the guys to. It’s not a good situation no matter how you look at it, male or female.
So the military had to come up with something. They didn’t say your sexual orientation had to be one way or another. Just don’t tell people as it may make someone uncomfortable in certain situations. The policy is not meant to say that being homosexual or bisexual is bad. It is just to aid in the living and working conditions while in the military. It’s like forcing a non-smoker to live in a room with a smoker. It doesn’t work out.
We all know it would be beyond wrong to house all heterosexuals and homosexuals separately. I don’t see that there is a way that a compromise could be met without hurting somebody’s feelings somewhere. So the military was forced to accept the lesser of two evils. That’s the cold hard truth people.

Posted by: ThinkAboutIt | October 11, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

As usual, Obama is focused on the most pressing national issue confronting Americans at the moment. (rolls eyes)

Posted by: Stacey | October 11, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

the president produces many words.

Posted by: Michael R. Brown | October 11, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

How is it “radical social policy” to allow homosexuals to serve in the military? Homosexuals have been serving in militaries for thousands of years, and in America’s for at least 200. Everyone knows it; most people don’t care.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 11, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Why does Obama keep dodging the most pressing issue of the time: the economy and helping our youth find jobs. He truly is a disappointment and will not get my vote in the next election.

Posted by: michael hall | October 11, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Why does anyone care who each of us are we are all born into this world as the person we are to be, all persons are equal, straight gay bi transgender all the same. As for religion bashing the gays I think they need to look at their own faluts first like hatred, envey, and being unable to stay in those sacraid marriges that they want no others to enjoy.

Posted by: tealtripod55 | October 11, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Poor Jhw hasn’t figured out that not only is Reverend Wright an issue in racist churches but so are all the idiots that sat in the pews without walking out. In otherwords, every member of Wright’s/Obama’s church is just as quilty as Wright.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 11, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

The Poll I read said that 51% are against Obama with 38% stating that very against Obama while only 31% say they support Obama making Obama with a negative 6% score despite all the manipulation that is known in polls for dems. If the elections were held today, Obama would be tossed out. I want him tossed in jailed myself and hope that many more catch on to what Obama is actually doing.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 11, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

The Poll I read said that 51% are against Obama with 38% stating that very against Obama while only 31% say they support Obama making Obama with a negative 6% score despite all the manipulation that is known in polls for dems.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | Oct 11, 2009 5:34:11 PM
That sounds like the Rasmussen* daily Presidential Tracking poll on acid. Try this instead:
49% at least somewhat approve of Obama’s job performance. 51% disapprove.
38% strongly disapprove and 32% strongly approve, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index of -6.
Other job approval polls:
Approve / Disapprove
56/37 Gallup
56/34 CBS News
56/40 Ipsos/McClatchy**
56/39 Associated Press/GfK
50/41 Quinnipiac
52/36 Pew Research
50/42 FOX News
52/40 National Journal/FD
*Choice pollster of conservatives
**Tied for most accurate pollster in the 2008 presidential election results

Posted by: Numeros | October 11, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Every wife beater “promises” he’ll never do it again. And they always end up in the ER the next time. Are you tired of being the battered wife in your relationship with the “Messiah” Democrats??? How many beatings can you take before your dead? Obama is more than willing to find out. Save yourselves, grow a pair, stand UP to the bully… And THROW HIM OUT!!!

Posted by: jafo | October 11, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Wondering will the gays bunk with the women and the lesbians bunk with the guys. Only seems appropriate.

Posted by: wondering | October 11, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Obama’s biggest accomplishment so far as president? Winning the Nobel Peace Prize-
Jay Leno
The LGBT community should not expect the Ditherer In Chief to repeal DADT or DOMA any time soon.

Posted by: ollie | October 11, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Posted by: jafo | Oct 11, 2009 7:17:45 PM
***
I find it difficult (impossible) to take seriously your mocking of the President as the Messiah (you sound envious of his charisma) when the GOP elected (barely) a rich oil cowboy with whom they’d like to have a beer and he did his utmost to destroy the country– see the economy, two wars, the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and so on– all the while with good (I give the benefit of the doubt) yet grossly misguided intentions. And wasn’t it Bush and his office pushing FMA? His Justice department not hiring and actually firing gays and lesbians? Did he make a speech at HRC? And how did the rule of law fare under GOP rule? Think Dems would be happier and feel safer with McCain at the helm rather than Obama? Seriously? Did you read Frank Rich’s op-ed about McCain today? Check it out.
As for your exploitation of the true tragedy of domestic violence to make a trifling and partisan political point– wow, that’s messed up.

Posted by: Alyson | October 11, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

You know promises only go so far actions speak louder than words I was taught. The American people are growing tired of empty promises. However we are taking note of the Presidents attempt to cleanup the big mess that was left for him. He is a good man with good intentions. Bright and Articulate but that only goes so far. Actions. Not Words. They are getting old.

Posted by: Steve | October 11, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

That speech by Obama was worthy of a Nobel prize.

Posted by: Woody | October 11, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Obama deserves to be pulled in different directions.
He’s being caught in all kinds of lies and empty promises.
Obama is a mega-liberal that pretended to be a centurist just to get elected.
Why those savy independents couldn’t see through the fluff and fancy talk I will never understand.
Obama must wink at the liberals while talking to the moderates/conservatives.
With every speech he must have his fingers crossed.

Posted by: millie | October 11, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Alyson,
Ronald Reagan said it best: “It’s not that my liberal friends are ignorant, it’s just that they know so much that isn’t true.”
The tired argument of blaming Katrina and 9/11 on Bush is silly on so many levels. Should we have blamed the bombing at Oklahoma, the USS Cole, and the first WTC bombings on Clinton because they happened while he was President? No, but rather, our lax ancient Roman look-alike society for not being vigilant and arrogantly presuming that we can prosper while we decay from within. Here’s another great quote: “A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within” (Durant on the fall of the Roman Empire).
Mother Nature put one on us and we got sucker punched by radicals because we presume that we are untouchable and incapable of falling like the Roman Empire. Local and federal governments BOTH, were unprepared for both Katrina and 9/11.
Our guards have been down for far too long because we were and still are a presumptuous society no different than the ancient Romans before their great fall.
So who’s to blame for the Dec. 26, 2004 tsunami that killed hundreds of thousands? Blaming one person for Mother Nature’s fury is absurd. Give it a rest already it’s old, tiresome, and childish. Only in crackpot America do such ridiculous accusations stick – because we’re a bunch of dumb whities. That’s just how it went down and the infighting and rampant institutionalized immorality I see in America is a carbon copy of the Roman Empire’s self destruction.

Posted by: Tired Arguments | October 12, 2009, 5:12 am 5:12 am

When the gay community says “Obama gives a great speech but it yet to even come close to delivering” then they are going to be on the lookout for one thing and one thing only: results.
It should be interesting to see how this plays out – the Obama marketing machine (saying what people want to hear) versus the cold reality of producing (as in doing what Obama says he is going to do). The gay community smells a rat and they are about to respond.
This administration is likely to go down in history as the “Duping of America.” The ether is wearing off – and a couple of very vocal communities are starting to say “the Emperor has no clothes.”

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | October 12, 2009, 7:14 am 7:14 am

He finally went to church? That should be the story!

Posted by: Ferd | October 12, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Posted by: Tired Arguments | Oct 12, 2009 5:12:06 AM
Before you go on about natural disasters, it would be nice if you could read, or comprehend what you read. Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, I wrote. That means clean up and rebuilding. And I didn’t bring up the incompetence going into 9/11, you did. And I was pretty nice and didn’t say two “grossly mismanaged” wars on borrowed money with no sacrifice asked of anyone other than the troops and the economy, eventually– I just said two wars, but the subtext was there.
Catch a clue, Tired. Catch a clue. I do agree that your stuck on the same old, same old and that your moniker fits, but don’t project that on to me unless you want to be a bit more honest. Some of us look to the past to weigh progress and to learn not to repeat mistakes. Open your eyes. Would Dems and their causes be better off under McCain or Bush? No. I was responding to jafo, as a Dem, and you say nothing about his ridiculous post? That tells me all I need to know…
Did you read Frank Rich’s op-ed about McCain yesterday? Check it out.
As for jafo’s exploitation of the true tragedy of domestic violence, during Domestic Violence Awareness month, to make a trifling and partisan political point– wow, that’s messed up.
And your tired defense of it isn’t much better.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Tens of thousands of gay rights activists marched Sunday in Washington (without lying about their numbers to ridiculously inflate them) to show President Obama and Congress that they are impatient with piecemeal progress. They’re fighting at the federal level for across-the-board equality,and I applaud their efforts as I think with this particular president and Congress, they have a real shot.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Alyson,
Do you live along the Beltway? Or do you live in the ABC Newsroom?

Posted by: Tired Arguments | October 12, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

“Poor Jhw hasn’t figured out that not only is Reverend Wright an issue in racist churches but so are all the idiots that sat in the pews without walking out. In otherwords, every member of Wright’s/Obama’s church is just as quilty as Wright.”
Quilty?
Is that a quality of being warm and snuggy?
A quality of combining exceptional penmanship with a fondness for Olde English colloquialisms?

Posted by: Ryan C | October 12, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

“Tens of thousands of gay rights activists marched Sunday in Washington (without lying about their numbers to ridiculously inflate them) to show President Obama and Congress that they are impatient with piecemeal progress.”
Demanding their rights regardless of who is in office. I like that.
The right wing would have marched against Bush’s spending that they say they were so against but FoxNews did not tell them to.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 12, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Alyson,
Do you live along the Beltway? Or do you live in the ABC Newsroom?
Posted by: Tired Arguments | Oct 12, 2009 4:09:47 PM
__________________________________
“Tired Arguments” must be one of those people on here every day or every week and using different names so as to not appear obsessive about being here.
Alyson’s excellent arguments (delivered under her name) must be overwhelming the spammer, so he has to use personal attack . . . because there is nothing else.

Posted by: tierra | October 12, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

I believe that some standards should not be changed.Icould agree with what gays want if they could reproduce without Alterations.

Posted by: Tomglee | October 12, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

“tierra”: There was no personal attack – it was a simple question because I’m curious.

Posted by: Tired Arguments | October 12, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Alyson’s excellent arguments (delivered under her name) must be overwhelming the spammer, so he has to use personal attack . . . because there is nothing else.
Posted by: tierra | Oct 12, 2009 6:14:36 PM
Thanks Tierra.
Tired, nope and nope.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.