Rangel Ethics Probe Expands
ABC News' Jonathan Karl and Rick Klein reports:
The House ethics committee announced today that members have voted to expand their inquiry into House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel’s financial irregularities, to include changes he made to financial disclosure statements.
It’s the latest in several expansions of the Rangel probe over the past year, and it comes as Republicans are stepping up pressure on Democrats to remove Rangel, D-N.Y., from his powerful post atop the tax-writing committee.
The House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct also said in a brief statement that it has authorized nearly 150 subpoenas in the Rangel investigations, has interviewed 34 witnesses who have accumulated some 2,100 pages of transcripts, and reviewed more than 12,000 pages of documents. Those details suggest a more aggressive investigation than previously known.
GOP lawmakers used the announcement of an expanded probe to renew their calls for Rangel to step aside pending the ethics committee’s findings.
“If you don’t drain the swamp, you’ll end up with a lake,” said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the top Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. “This isn’t an isolated incident — it’s a pattern-of-behavior.”
House Democrats yesterday voted to deflect a resolution offered by Republicans that would have stripped Rangel of his gavel.
This is the third time the committee has opened up new areas of investigation into Rep. Rangel’s conduct. To recap:
On July 31, 2008, the committee launched a “review” of:
- Rangel’s four luxury rent-stabilized apartments in New York. These are apartments that Rangel enjoys for about half their market value at a time when others in rent stabilized apartments are facing evictions as the city cuts down on rent control.
- Rangel’s use of official Congressional stationary to raise money for the City College of New York’s “Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service”. The letters were sent to those with business before the Ways & Means Committee and were seen by some as a not-so-subtle shakedown.
On September 24, 2008, the committee voted to conduct an official investigation into the rental-controlled apartments, the fundraising for the Rangel Center and two additional issues:
- Rangel’s failure to disclose or pay taxes on a no-interest loans Rangel he received to buy a condo at the Punta Cana Yacht Club in the Dominican Republic.
- Rangel’s failure to disclose or pay taxes on $75,000 in rental income Rangel received from the Punta Cana condo.
On February 10, 2009, the committee voted to re-authorize its investigation of these matters in the new Congress.
And today, the committee voted to once again expand its investigation to include:
- Rangel’s failure to report more than $500,000 in assets on his financial disclosure forms required from all members of Congress.
Back in November of last year, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi told reporters that she expected the ethics committee to complete its investigation by January 3, 2009. Ten months after that deadline passed, it appears the Rangel investigation is nowhere near over.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Charlie gets to write the tax laws. Pelosi wanted the committee to have this investigation done by January 2009. Maybe she meant 2010 or maybe she just fibbed. Maybe she is just like Charlie
Posted by: jamescbuilder | October 8, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
“Democrats are leading the effort to turn the most closed, corrupt Congress in history into the most open and honest Congress in history,” Nancy Pelosi 2006
Posted by: L Trotsky | October 8, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Dont’ these Dems have any shame???
Posted by: wis134 | October 8, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
“Democrats are leading the effort to turn the most closed, corrupt Congress in history into the most open and honest Congress in history,” Nancy Pelosi 2006 Posted by: L Trotsky>>>>>>> LOL LOL LOL
Man thats funny.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | October 8, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
If any of us plain citizens did anything close to what this idiot has done in our jobs relating to ethics we would have been shown the door long ago. Time to take the right of politicians to investigate themselves on these ethics problems and give the responsibility to a real law enforcement agency they would have wrapped this all up by now and filled charges.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | October 8, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Pelosi is just as corrupt as Rangel. Why did they agree to give funds back to ACORN come Nov. 1, 2009 or is this a joke?
Posted by: bailedout | October 8, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Another tax evader?
So much for Nancy’s
“Most honest, open, ethical government.”
I always noticed the higher the stack of bibles sworn on, or more eloquent slogans sworn to are usually made by the biggest liars.
You lie.
. . . ab
. . .Lancaster, Taxifornia . . .push 1 for english
Posted by: a.b. normal | October 8, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Rep. Rangel keeps trying to bring back the selective service draft (without school deferments).
If he was successful in this the voters would remove him.
Posted by: a.b. normal | October 8, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
wow, whatever happened to the senate’s probe into diane feinstein’s back door funneling of federal contracts to her husband’s (Mr. Blum) construction firm? In which of course she partakes of the profits also.
Now that’s what i call corruption, malfeasance, betrayal, and all the other bad terms rolled into one.
She carried a snub nosed nickel plated 38 in her purse as the mayor of SF.
She is for gun control. For you that is.
ab
Posted by: a.b. normal | October 8, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Dont’ these Dems have any shame???
Posted by: wis134 | Oct 8, 2009 6:00:33 PM
_______________________________________
Do the names David Vitter and John Ensign ring any bells? I’m not trying to defend Charlie Rangel as I feel he is a crook and should be removed from office but lets call it like it is here…….and across the board.
These people who make the laws should be held to a higher standard. All 3 that I named should be looking for a job in the private sector.
Posted by: dk | October 9, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am
This guy is a pathetic, worthless excuse of a joke. The people of New York’s 15th district must be the stupidest in the whole country! To keep casting votes for this old peace of garbage!
Posted by: JV | October 9, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am
Minnesota isn’t smart enough to elect a competent senator, and the 15th congressional district isn’t smart enough to elect a clean compentent representative.
Posted by: JV | October 9, 2009, 3:03 am 3:03 am
Another person trying to hide money / not pay taxes, running the tax-writing committee? There is a difference between having an affair and evading the tax man, particularly when you can influence the outcome of any tax code changes.
Posted by: tired of it all | October 9, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am
D.K….what exactly was David Vitter supposed to have done?
Posted by: bo | October 9, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am
Lawmakers should be held to a ‘higher standard’? I’d be happy if they were held to the ‘same standard’!
Posted by: LongT | October 9, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I hope Ms. Pelosi sticks by her buddy, Charlie. The closer the better. Then they can go down in flames together.
Posted by: Tom Beebe | October 9, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
You would think after a year they could produce something? Oh ! I forgot it is a Democratic Ethics committee. Charlie donated $20,000.00 to each of their campaign funds,you really think they are trying? Talk about a conflict of interest,Where is Nancy’s Ethical congress? Oh! I forgot she pays her husband a $100,000.00 a year for advice.No wonder they just voted themselves a 8% budget increase.
Posted by: marion | October 9, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm