By Britt

Oct 9, 2009 1:14pm

Today’s Qs for O’s White House

ABC News' David Wright Reports:

David Wright:  The Republican National Committee has been less than magnanimous about this (The President winning the Nobel Peace Prize).  The Democrats are now comparing their reaction to the Taliban.  What do you think of that?  And how does this complicate the domestic political situation for the president?

GIBBS:  How does what complicate?

David Wright:  How does the idea of him winning this prize, if at all?

GIBBS:  I don't know that it complicates the domestic political situation.  I — I have not…

David Wright:  Does it raise expectations too high?  Does it contribute to the perception that he's, you know, all expectation and no — no results yet?

GIBBS:  Look, I — I think, as the president said today, this is a — this announcement today represents not the achievements of one person, but the hopes of millions and millions throughout the world of the life and the world that they want to live in, whether that's a world without nuclear weapons, a world without the spread of weapons of mass destruction, a world with peace in the Middle East, a world that addresses climate change. I think all of those things are what millions throughout the world hope that — hope that can be achieved, but understanding, as the president said today, that can't be achieved by one person.  It has to be achieved through the collective action of the world.  And that's what he'll continue to work on.

-David Wright

User Comments

On extending an Olive Branch to our adversaries, President Obama has been awarded one of the most Prestigious Awards in the World — The Nobel Peace Award. For his efforts and courage on a world stage to engage with the enemy, to sit at the table and break bread, to engage in peaceful dialouge with respect, and to extend to our “alleged” enemies an Olive Branch and not a Stick, the GOP jealousy ask — But, what has he done?
What he has done, in the face of much criticism, as stated above, is to extend an Olive Branch to our adversaries, because only peace can bring peace. He has fostered and ignited the will to good, which in turn, will increase goodwill around the world. In the face of ridicule, President Obama has set the tone and direction toward unity, cooperation and oneness, recognizing our interconnectedness with all nations around the world — that we are all brothers/sisters and souls of the one Great Life from which we have all originated from. This is a very big deal Indeed because it is a Consciousness change which will change the actions of men on earth.

Posted by: angellight | October 9, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Not sure how the Nobel prize will have any impact on his domestic stature. The majority of Republicans hold the Nobel committee in contempt already and consider them part of the liberal conspiracy that also includes all scientists, old Europe, Chavez, educated ‘elites’, Warren Buffet and reality. This award makes no difference domestically, but it does give America a bit bigger moral stick in international affairs.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 9, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

He’s read the words off a teleprompter from a starry-eyed, naive, 27 year old speech writer. Yay us!

Posted by: jennifert7 | October 9, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

clinics are being set up as we speak all over america to provide health services to republicans
and right wingers to help them deal with their blood pressure rising over the peace prize being awarded to Obama.
true to their commitment, Dems and Obama provide this medical service to all free of charge

Posted by: Sasquatch | October 9, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

I am sick and tired of hearing all this transnational crap from the Obama admin. The President of the United States is supposed to act in our best interests, not in an effort to bring all nations to the same level of respect or power in the global community. I am deeply offended when my president seeks to lower my country to the level of China, Russia, Burma, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, or any other one of these totalitarian regimes. I am ok we if try and put ourselves on the same level in international relations as democratic regimes like Canada, Britain, Israel, India, South Korea, just to name a few. I still believe in the exceptional character of our democratic republic and the constitution it was founded on, but let’s try and use that moral high ground as a bully pulpit to pressure the totalitarian regimes into change instead of appeasing them, and to encourage other democracies instead of persecuting them.

Posted by: Jason | October 9, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

“…and right wingers to help them deal with their blood pressure rising over the peace prize being awarded to Obama.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Are you kidding? Laughter is the best medicine and we’ve been having one huge belly laugh after another since this was announced!

Posted by: jennifert7 | October 9, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

If the Dems are comparing the GOP to siding with the Taliban, is that the bad Taliban that Pakistan is ready to go with war with or the good Taliban that obama wants to be partners with?

Posted by: DJ | October 9, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Gotta agree with jennifer7, after spending the last 3 days fighting this swine flu thing, Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize award has given me a BIG MUCH NEEDED LAUGH AND WAS JUST THE MEDICINE I NEEDED…LOL…

Posted by: Parallex View | October 9, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Obama is bound to win the MVP at the NBA finals–he’s got so much b-ball potential.
If the comics don’t have plenty of material on Obama now they never will.
It must kill them to have to keep silent for fear of angering the left.

Posted by: larry | October 9, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Ruth Marcus, being less than magnanimous:
“’Mom!’ my 12-year-old yelled from the kitchen. “President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize!’
“I told her she had to be mistaken.
“This is ridiculous — embarrassing, even. I admire President Obama. I like President Obama. I voted for President Obama. But the peace prize? This is supposed to be for doing, not being — and it’s no disrespect to the president to suggest he hasn’t done much yet. Certainly not enough to justify the peace prize.
“‘Extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples?’ ‘Captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future?’ Please. This turns the award into something like pee-wee soccer: everybody wins for trying.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 9, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

I haven’t laughed this hard since last week when the IOC snubbed superegos Michelle, Barack, and Oprah.
Obama, the Citizen Of the World, won another popularity contest.
And once again he did it with absolutely no significant achievements
other than being a great BS’er.

Posted by: kyle | October 9, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Nicholas Kristof, being less than magnanimous:
“So what do you think of President Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize? I’m nonplussed — I admire his efforts toward Middle East peace, but the prize still seems very premature. What has he done?
“Obama’s work on the Middle East, mostly through Senator Mitchell’s efforts, are sensible but haven’t produced any results yet. They certainly don’t match the intensive efforts that Bill Clinton made with his Middle East peace negotiations in the fall of 2000. Likewise, Obama’s efforts on nuclear disarmament/non-proliferation are important, but they are purely an aspiration. All the hard work is yet to come — and trying to renegotiate the NPT will be very hard indeed.
“In other areas, Obama has done little. He’s been largely absent on Sudan, Congo, Burma and global poverty and health issues, and doesn’t even have a USAID administrator….”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 9, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

There is nothing Obama, the Obamamedia, or the WH can point to other than speeches as to why he won this.
If he had the guts to stand up for the Iranians fighting Ahmadinejad–but he was afraid to interfere.
Even in the Honduras he stood with Chavez instead of the people fighting for democracy.
How is that inspiring millions?
What a joke.

Posted by: ollie | October 9, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Well he did once bow to a tyrant that treats women like cattle.
That has to inspire somebody.

Posted by: larry | October 9, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Tick tock…
Obama better close Gitmo on time.
And how can he possibly continue Bush’s policies now? No more renditions or indefinite detention.
No more drone attacks and bombing villages.
Pull all the troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Everyone loves us now.

Posted by: frank | October 9, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

obamacrat…I believe this award was made more of political reasoning than that of true accomplishments…but even you statement stretches the bounds of good taste…

Posted by: Parallex View | October 9, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

This just shows that you have to be a community organizer with ACORN ties, can read from a telepromter, make good use of Airforce One (at taxpayers expense) Promise everything to everybody and outsource all problems, so you can’t be blamed. And if you happend to be stuck with a problem, find someone else to blame it on.
I wonder why after this anouncement, the world is dumping dollars, do they know something, that we will soon find out????

Posted by: Lizzie | October 9, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

What is the reason for our unprovoked attack on the moon? Will the UN Security Council convene a meeting to discuss America’s naked aggression? Is Obama trying to start an interplanetary war?

Posted by: The Onion | October 9, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

The Nobel committee should be relieved that they will not be labeled racist like the IOC or anyone else that snubs Obama.

Posted by: pami | October 9, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

The Nobel committee should be relieved that they will not be labeled racist like the IOC or anyone else that snubs Obama.
__________________________________
Nonsense . . . again the right wing brings up race as an issue.

Posted by: tierra | October 9, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Right wingers grasping at straws . . .

Posted by: tierra | October 9, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Humility is not the POTUS’ strong point.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | October 9, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

BREAKING NEWS:
Obama to be given the CY Young Award for bouncing his opening pitch at the All Star game.

Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | October 9, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Obama named “Bowler of the Year”. for 2010

Posted by: millie | October 9, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

The committee was going to pick a liberal.
Too bad it wasn’t Bill Clinton–he really earned it.

Posted by: bailey | October 9, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

David,
“The Republican National Committee has been less than magnanimous about this (The President winning the Nobel Peace Prize). The Democrats are now comparing their reaction to the Taliban. What do you think of that? And how does this complicate the domestic political situation for the president?”
The only thing Democrats are guilty of is pointing out the truth.
The Republicans act like pouting children once again. But their comments have been given the seal of approval from their feared and exalted defacto leader Rush Limbaugh: “I think that everybody is laughing. Our president is a worldwide joke. Folks, do you realize something has happened here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about and that is he doesn’t deserve the award. Now that’s hilarious, that I’m on the same side of something with the Taliban, and that we all are on the same side as the Taliban.”
I think the more Republicans keep talking like this the more this complicates their “domestic political situation”. It’s all they have going on…mud slinging…talks of treason…the party of no…slowly but surely talking their way into irrelevance.
However, the Political Punch crew seems more interested in stirring the pot, inventing “domestic political situations”, looking for the mud and rarely calling out the Republicans on their constant hysterics and continue to treat their idea of the news like a high brow Drudge…kinda like Politico!

Posted by: Patrick in Chicago | October 9, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

An honest liberal at the HuffPo, being less than magnanimous:
“Whatever one might feel about Obama, he has not earned this singular award,” Russnow wrote. “Few American presidents have received it and of those who have it was bestowed after they’d been engaged in something special…. I believe it is enormously premature for Obama to be getting this great tribute, which to a certain extent cheapens the prior recipients and the work all of them performed over so many years.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 9, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Gibbs: this announcement today represents not the achievements of one person, but the hopes of millions and millions throughout the world of the life and the world that they want to live in
=============
No. It actually represents the opinion of a small committee in Oslo.

Posted by: MayBee | October 9, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

What the hell, let the guy enjoy it. The award will look good on his resume after the el’presidente gig ends.
This peace award and one dollar buys a happy meal, I think.

Posted by: bl | October 9, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

If President Obama had a shred of integrity, he would decline this award, saying that it is premature. He won’t.

Posted by: JimAK | October 9, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Republicans, acting like Kanye West. Big surprise.

Posted by: Flash Override | October 9, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

During election time we’ve come to accept that the banal nature of mankind will show itself. However, after the election is over, do we have to continue to rest in a bed of shameful meanness?
Will we be defined by what is the most vicious and mean-spirited parts of our nature? Will we be destroyed by foreign enemies, or will we implode by our own divisiveness?
We let issues be the arena that define our venom. Really, though, we don’t care about the issues: we care about being destructive. We want to destroy each other. And we’re not satisfied until someone’s meat is served up on the platter for the dinner of our conceit. Our conceit is simply grounded in the belief that we can overpower “them.” This never-ending need to overpower is rooted at soul level.
But “Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” (Proverbs 18 :16) Pride bares within itself the seeds of destruction.
Issues are straw men to prop up the fight. When one set of issues goes away, another set will emerge, but the fight goes on.
How much better it would be to find within ourselves that part that is capable of love. There resides within all of us an energy that is capable of embracing that which is different from itself. That energy does not simply embrace that which is different, it values that which is different. In fact it is the fusion of life’s yin and yang that create the very life force itself. Within the cloak of sameness, differentness must be found in order for the life force to manifest itself. When we can embrace another’s struggle to find something of our own, then new creation emerges.
If we could learn this life principle, then we [and all nations] could “… beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.” (Micah 4:3)

Posted by: Rev. C. Mark Ealy | October 9, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Just like the goofballs to ignore the abundant–and hysterically funny–criticism, even ridicule, from the left.
Obama inherited the award from Bush.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 9, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

There go the French, acting like Republicans again:
“Obama meritait-il le prix Nobel de la paix 2009?
Oui – 30%
Non – 70%”
(Le Figaro)

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 9, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

They’re all oui-oui-ed up.

Posted by: PD | October 9, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

…Rush Limbaugh: “…we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about and that is he doesn’t deserve the award. Now that’s hilarious, that I’m on the same side of something with the Taliban, and that we all are on the same side as the Taliban.”
Posted by: Patrick in Chicago | Oct 9, 2009 4:40:11 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well, the depth of the true colors, of the leaders of the Republican Party finally comes out.
Or did it?
Could it be that there is something even more sinister resides deep in hearts and souls of Limbaugh, Beck and the like?…you bet there is!
These people hate humanity. They want nothing less than total domination over other humans.
They hate the ‘Teachings of Jesus Christ’. They hate Jesus himself.
This is clear to anyone who has studied the relatively few ‘Spoken Words of Jesus’ and compares them to the ‘statements and actions’ of the far-right Republicans.
The Republican philosophy, platform, and preferred way of life are exactly ‘anti-Christ’. They are ‘anti-Christ-ian’ in the purest sense of the word!
And the far-right…well as we can see, they are like ‘Satan Incarnate’!
Why do we know this?…Because Satan hates the ‘Teachings of Jesus’ AND Jesus as much as they do!

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 9, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Headlines:
OBAMAMESSIAH WINS NOBEL PEACE PRIZE AFTER NOMINATIONS CLOSE 11 DAYS AFTER ASSUMING OFFICE.
US BOMBS MOON IN NAKED ACT OF IMPERIALIST AGGRESSION.
What makes it all hysterical is that they are not headlines from The Onion.

Posted by: Robert Gibbs | October 10, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

There was a lot said yesterday. I think reasonable cases can be made for different positions– that the award was premature and needs to be earned in the future, that the award involved politics and a weighing in on America during the Bush/Cheney years, and that the award was deserved by President Obama, as surprising as it was, and makes a lot of sense given his vision and his role as an idealistic yet pragmatic game changer on the world stage. I also think the statements put out by both the RNC and DNC were over the top, but I really liked this the entry regarding the prize from Juan Cole at his Informed Comment blog. Here’s an excerpt–
“The Right in the US objected to Obama getting the peace prize on the alleged grounds that he had not yet done anything to deserve it. But the Right in the United States is to peace as velociraptors were to vegetarianism. They don’t believe in the ideal for which the award stands in the first place. And they find President Obama laughable, so they can’t imagine him getting any awards. They have underestimated him badly and will probably pay a price for that. They misunderstand the Nobel Peace Prize and its history…”
Read the whole thing as well as Andrew Sullivan’s blog on the topic (“All over the world”
“But the Right in the United States is to peace as velociraptors were to vegetarianism– ” that cracks me up. So true!

Posted by: Alyson | October 10, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Another good point from Paul Raushenbush at Beliefnet:
“The committee especially cited the approach he has had to nuclear weapons as evidenced in the speech in Prague; and his willingness to directly engage the Muslim world in his brilliant speech in Cairo. Anyone who domestically dismisses these efforts will have explain why America has risen in the past ten months to be the most admired nation in the world after having fallen during President Bush’s terms.”

Posted by: Alyson | October 10, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.