By Gorman Gorman

Oct 29, 2009 2:40pm

‘Top Line’ — Can the Obamas be Role Models Through Their Marriage?

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Among the very many interesting things about the cover story about the Obama marriage in the forthcoming issue of The New York Times Magazine is the fact that the Obamas chose to be cooperate with the story at all.On ABCNews.com's "Top Line" today, we asked the author of that article, Jodi Kantor, about the decision by the Obamas to agree to an extended interview about their marriage — something, it's fair to say, the First Lady Michelle Obama, Kantor said, felt strongly that it was important for people to realize that there is no such thing as a perfect marriage."She said that if being honest about her own marriage can help younger people then, it's worth putting herself on the line to do it," Kantor told us. "And she also says that she doesn't want people — she basically doesn't think that perfection exists in a marriage, and she doesn't want people to think it does. And I think the Obamas are highly aware that there are all of these beautiful, kind of lovey-dovey images out there of you know, the two of them looking unbelievably happy and content.""They were elected in part because they didn't seem like regular politicians, they seemed more like the rest of us and yet, [yet] everything in the White House is perfect and buffed to such a high shine," Kantor added. "So I think this interview was part of them … trying to serve as role models and connect with people."One of the most interesting exchanges came when Kantor asked whether it's possible to have an equal partnership in a marriage, when one of the partners is president of the United States.
Writes Kantor: Michelle Obama gave what sounded like a small, sharp "mmphf" of recognition, and the fluid teamwork of their answers momentarily came to a halt. "Well, first of all. . . ." the president started. His wife peered at him, looking curious as to how he might answer the question. "She's got. . . ." he began, but then stopped again.
"Well, let me be careful about this," he said, pausing once more.
"My staff worries a lot more about what the first lady thinks than they worry about what I think," he finally said, to laughter around the room.
The question still unanswered, his wife stepped back in: "Clearly Barack's career decisions are leading us. They're not mine; that's obvious. I'm married to the president of the United States. I don't have another job, and it would be problematic in this role. So that — you can't even measure that." She did add that they are more equal in their private lives — how they run their household, how they raise their children, the overall choices they make.Said Kantor, of that exchange: "I've interviewed the Obamas before separately and they're so eloquent. And it's very rare that a question surprises them, but they had kind of a moment."Click HERE to watch the full interview with Jodi Kantor.

User Comments

wow. Here we go. Obamas state run news is off again trying to save his image. Want a role model? My mom and dad 61 years, my uncle 56 years, my brother 40 years, my second brother 42 years, me 34 years. Do not need this guy and his wife for a role model. teach your kids yourself.

Posted by: Jim Rod | October 29, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Two wars, huge unemployment, millions without affordable health care,
bridges literally falling down, an educational system that produces citizens who can neither adequately think or even read, an epidemic of greed and lying, AND the national media locks onto stories like this. Even then the reporting is wrong. Where in the interview did either the Pres. or his wife hold themselves out as marriage role models?

Posted by: B. Bear | October 29, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

I always find it funny that the naysayers call it; “Obama State run news.” Again, it only shows that they only know what is “fed” to them and have no inkling of what is reality or what they are talking about.
For your benefit; ABC, is OWNED by the Disney company (DIS), which is publicly traded. NBC, is OWNED by GE (GE), a publicly traded company. CBS, which is publicly traded (CBS), is majority OWNED by Viacom (VIA)another publicly traded company. Finally, MSNBC is a partnership OWNED by GE (remember a publicly traded company) and MicroSoft (MFST) another publicly traded company. Oh yes!!! CNN is OWNED by Time/Warner (TWX), once again… another publicly traded company.
These are capitalist companies! There is a very good chance that even you own these companies within your own portfolio or within the mutual funds you hold!
So… where is this “state-run” business coming from?

Posted by: FS | October 29, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Blah Blah Blah, like anyone cares about their marriage. He is the President,not some Hollywood star. Oh wait could have fooled me…..

Posted by: suchajoke | October 29, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

What?! How dare he be married while there are problems in this nation! Next you’ll be telling me he has the temerity to raise children when he should be LOWERING — TAXES!

Posted by: T | October 29, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

FS, It doesn’t take a genius to see that the mainstream media,ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN and MSNBC are nothing more than a propaganda machine for the Democrats and Obama,no matter who owns them.They might as well go in together under one name,PRAVADA comes to mind.Fox news keep up the good work.

Posted by: Johnny L | October 30, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Make that PRAVDA,I said I wasn’t a genius.

Posted by: Johnny L | October 30, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Do we not have more important things to discuss, yes I am sure they will have a major impact on everyones current marriage, we will probably see a major decline in divorce and actually see Dads remain in all families for the benefit of all the children. We certainly know they will be a better example for marriage than the Clintons and on the same level as the Bush family. Now let’s move on

Posted by: Dave | October 30, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

JimRod, suchajoke & Dave:
Were you aware nearly 4 out of every 10 births are now to unmarried women? Maybe that’s not news on FOX, but it’s important news for the future of our nation.
According to childstats.gov, increases in births to unmarried women affect family structure and the economic security of kids.
Children of unmarried mothers are at higher risk of adverse birth outcomes such as low birthweight and infant mortality than are children of married mothers. They are also more likely to live in poverty than children born into married families.
If you care about issues like “taxes” or “welfare”, or little kids growing up in poverty, then yah, this IS an important issue.
Our President and his wife discuss the reality of marriage and how they make their children a priority. They actually DO serve as role models. How is that somehow “bad” or a waste of media space?

Posted by: CenterOne | October 30, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Real news about anything important isn’t entertainment — it’s complicated and boring. That’s why there’s so little of it on television, which from the beginning has been about persuading people to buy crap they don’t need. Cut the cable and free your mind! (Your precious children will grow up smarter too.)

Posted by: Gerhard Magnus | October 30, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.