‘Top Line’ — Would Liberals Sink Health Care Reform?
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: If President Obama ultimately accepts a health care bill that doesn’t include the public option — as White House aides are strongly hinting — the move will be predicated on a big gamble: That liberal Democrats won’t sink reform by opposing such a measure.
That leaves backers of the public option doing everything they can to let the White House know they’re serious. On ABCNews.com’s “Top Line” today, Darcy Burner, executive director of the American Progressive Caucus Policy Foundation, said enough House members — and at least one senator, Sen. Roland Burris, D-Ill. — feel strongly enough about the issue that they’ll vote to sink any bill that doesn’t include a strong public-run option to compete with private insurers.
“You can’t pass a bill through the House of Representatives that doesn’t include a public option. The votes aren’t there, and we saw Sen. Roland Burris actually draw a fairly bright line in the sand very recently saying he will not vote for a bill that doesn’t include a public option,” Burner told us. “[The president] wants the bill to pass. If he wants the bill to pass it’s going to have to include a public option. There’s no other path,” Burner added. Burner’s organization is joining with other liberal group to press Democratic leaders and the White House to include a public option in the final version of a health care bill. Compromises that have been floated — such a “trigger” that would create a public option only if promised savings don’t materialize — aren’t acceptable, Burner said. “How much worse does it have to get? We’ve got people going bankrupt. We’ve got people dying,” she said. “That doesn’t cut it from the perspective of the members of the House who have drawn the line. They have said they want a robust public option from day one.” Burner called on President Obama to lobby moderate Democratic senators on the public option — or at least get them to rule out joining Republicans in filibustering a bill that includes one. “If the White House wants a health care bill, the most straightforward way for them to get one is to apply pressure on the handful of [moderate] Democratic senators. That pressure needs to be applied to have them support — or at least not filibuster — a public option. That’s the most straightforward way for them to get the health care bill they need.” Burner, who narrowly lost House races in Washington State in 2006 and 2008, said she won’t be a candidate in 2010 — but isn’t making commitments beyond that. “I have promised my spouse I wouldn’t run in 2010,” she said. Click HERE for the full discussion with Darcy Burner. Also on today’s program, we chatted with New York Times columnist Gail Collins, the author of a new book: “When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 to the Present.” Collins gave her take on why it’s been so difficult for the president to turn his campaign energy into governing action. “It was so easy when the question was, ‘Do you really hate George W. Bush?’ and everybody kind of rallied around that,” Collins said. “When the question is, ‘Which of the many health care plans would you like, and how much money do you think should go into the paying off people to get new policies, and what about the public option, or should there be a trigger option?’ That stuff is hard to imagine riotous crowds marching to the barricades for. It gets very complicated. We always knew that was going to be a weirder and harder thing to do.” Watch the interview with Gail Collins HERE.
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
What do you call reform?
Posted by: Thinking | October 19, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Yes. What Republicans are not considering is that while Democrats will own any reform passed, Republicans will own the status quo if they succeed in killing any reform. And in three years time, three years of employers passing along health care cost increases and scaling back benefits, that will be a huge liability. A liability that some of the more cynical liberals in Congress would love to hang around the GOP’s obstructionist neck.
Posted by: jhw539 | October 19, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
how would the Republicans ‘own’ anything if the Dems can’t even get members of their own party to support it?
Posted by: stdntDrvr | October 19, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
National health Care is the only true reform. Anything else is a smoke screen.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 19, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“how would the Republicans ‘own’ anything if the Dems can’t even get members of their own party to support it?”
stdntDrvr | Oct 19, 2009 4:09:20 PM
A unanimous NO vote and a filibuster is a very clear message. Republicans can play pass the buck all they want, but obstructing anything proposed by the Democrats is literally the only thing they’ve done. And people have noticed.
Posted by: jhw539 | October 19, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
How many more times do they have to hear that the people want the public option?? This is getting tiresome! The Independent party is looking better and better!
Posted by: booty | October 19, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
jhw539 the last time I looked Democrats had 60 votes in the senate. That gives them a filibuster proof majority. If a filibuster ensues, it will be Democrats who kill health care reform.
Posted by: j0112 | October 19, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
“jhw539 the last time I looked Democrats had 60 votes in the senate. That gives them a filibuster proof majority. If a filibuster ensues, it will be Democrats who kill health care reform.”
j0112 | Oct 19, 2009 4:24:02 PM
BWHAHAHAHA… Sure thing there. In Right Wing Math if 100% of Republicans oppose reform and 4% of Democrats oppose it the Democrats killed it!
Nope, the buck NEVER stops with the Republicans. They’re responsible for absolutely nothing, ever, Amen.
Posted by: jhw539 | October 19, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
This is an emotional issue for many Americans. As Consumers we should be able to compare the cost and quality of health care services. How much is a specific surgery at one hospital, as compared with another?
Posted by: dana | October 19, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
I would love to go on medicare now but i’m too young. I got diagnosed with a cancer syndrome so now I can’t change my job until I can go on Medicare because nobody will take me.
My employer provisions a health insurance company for which they pay dearly. Every other year its been a new provider. This is just a royal pain, processes never stay the same and you have to go thru whole new approval/authorization process to see your oncologists all over again.
Take notice that oncologists are always specialists and as such you must BEG permission to see them and receive their care.
I won’t mention the #@#%% insurance company that didn’t pay my bills reliably during my chemo. Or the other company that you could only reach after enduring torturous voice response menus that occasional just out and out hang up on you.
It’s difficult to understand why people out there think what we have is so great. let me advise you to never consider living in Florida and failing to buy homeowner insurance if you’re so cavalier about it all.
Posted by: trueblue | October 19, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
I don’t know what kind of health care reform will come out of this session, but I strongly suspect it won’t be much. There is, however a silver lining behind this very dark cloud. I am reminded of the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Don’t be embarrassed if you’ve never heard of it, there really isn’t a hell of a lot to remember about it; a mere pittance, really – a scrap of leftovers tossed out to “American Negros” (in the parlance of the age) in order to appease them. But it made the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – the one we remember – all-the-more easier seven years later.
We’ll live to fight another day.
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Posted by: Tom Degan | October 20, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am
The President would do well to remember his promises to the folks who elected him and stop catering to the folks who will never vote for him.
It’s time, Mr. President, to stop flapping your gums and walk the talk.
Maybe his wake-up call is for Liberals to begin voting against him. Until the President gets serious about supporting Liberals, there’s no reason why Liberals should support him. Many of us are beginning to wish we had voted for Hilary. At least, she is WYSIWYG. Obama is becoming very disappointing.
Maybe Hilary will get a second crack at the Presidency after all.
Posted by: Sammy | October 20, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I do agree with all of the ideas you have presented in your post. They’re really convincing and will certainly work. Still, the posts are very short for newbies. Could you please extend them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.
Posted by: tacho justierung | September 29, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm