<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House vs. Fox News, Part 34</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:49:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWW</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90930</link>
		<dc:creator>WWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90930</guid>
		<description>Posted by: PotatoeGater22 &#124; Oct 14, 2009 3:42:53 PM
FACT: Fox News Channel LIED. Period.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | Oct 14, 2009 3:42:53 PM<br />
FACT: Fox News Channel LIED. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90925</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90925</guid>
		<description>So Obama will talk to Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Taliban ... but not to Fox News.  He will talk to Castro, Ahmadinejad, and Chavez ... but will not do an interview with Brit Hume?  Perhaps Obama will only speak to those with whom he feels most comfortable.  Hmmmm.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Obama will talk to Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Taliban &#8230; but not to Fox News.  He will talk to Castro, Ahmadinejad, and Chavez &#8230; but will not do an interview with Brit Hume?  Perhaps Obama will only speak to those with whom he feels most comfortable.  Hmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90921</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90921</guid>
		<description>The White House is just following the Saul Alinsky playbook.  Don&#039;t worry about it Fox ... just keep reporting the facts &amp; don&#039;t react to their sophomoric tactics.  You are the top-rated cable news network for a reason good reason.  Keep it fair &amp; balanced ... you&#039;re doing a better job than your competitors.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House is just following the Saul Alinsky playbook.  Don&#8217;t worry about it Fox &#8230; just keep reporting the facts &amp; don&#8217;t react to their sophomoric tactics.  You are the top-rated cable news network for a reason good reason.  Keep it fair &amp; balanced &#8230; you&#8217;re doing a better job than your competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoeGater22</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90917</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoeGater22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90917</guid>
		<description>WWW wrote:  Last month, Fox News Channel ran full-page ads in three major newspapers claiming that ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN missed the story of the TEA party protest in Washington. That was a blatant, boldface lie.
I ask again, how do you Fox lovers excuse conduct like this?&quot;
Because Fox news showed some morals pointing out FACTS----the other sites should be better knows as propaganda cites that have consistently ignored to flat out lie about the GROWING NUMBER oF PEOPLE FED UP WITH THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENT showing up to protest at the teaparty rallies.   Fox reported and advertised the facts---they are willing to show the number of people showing up speaking out the government while the other stations tried so hard to sweep it under the carpet.  Bias in media, lies in media in masse.....coming for the numberous Obama proganda cites.  To bad so many don&#039;t realize only a handful of individuals own all the media sources and that the value/money for media doesn&#039;t come from adverterising persay anymore (hence the propaganda cites continued lying for Obama which is forcing viewers away) but in the MEDIA&#039;S ABILITY to MANIPULATE THE PUBLIC INTO BELEIVING LIES THAT BOTH OBAMA AND HIS PROPAGANDA CITES PRINT/SPEAK.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WWW wrote:  Last month, Fox News Channel ran full-page ads in three major newspapers claiming that ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN missed the story of the TEA party protest in Washington. That was a blatant, boldface lie.<br />
I ask again, how do you Fox lovers excuse conduct like this?&#8221;<br />
Because Fox news showed some morals pointing out FACTS&#8212;-the other sites should be better knows as propaganda cites that have consistently ignored to flat out lie about the GROWING NUMBER oF PEOPLE FED UP WITH THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENT showing up to protest at the teaparty rallies.   Fox reported and advertised the facts&#8212;they are willing to show the number of people showing up speaking out the government while the other stations tried so hard to sweep it under the carpet.  Bias in media, lies in media in masse&#8230;..coming for the numberous Obama proganda cites.  To bad so many don&#8217;t realize only a handful of individuals own all the media sources and that the value/money for media doesn&#8217;t come from adverterising persay anymore (hence the propaganda cites continued lying for Obama which is forcing viewers away) but in the MEDIA&#8217;S ABILITY to MANIPULATE THE PUBLIC INTO BELEIVING LIES THAT BOTH OBAMA AND HIS PROPAGANDA CITES PRINT/SPEAK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PotatoeGater22</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90914</link>
		<dc:creator>PotatoeGater22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90914</guid>
		<description>ABC, what is wrong with you people.   Fox&#039;s story of Obama&#039;s speech to kids was perfectly legite.  The story was absolutey factual and indeed Obama was forced to change his teaching plan demanding kids answer what they would do to help Obama.   Perhaps, if the bots and supposed journalists at ABC bothered to read a bit of history such as Hitlers targeting of youth to help him in 1933 Germany....that journalist at ABC would understand why such demands of Obama of school kids should be very troublesome and why Obama had to change his teaching plan once snagged.   ANY PRESIDENT DOING TO THIS KIDS SHOULD IMMEDIATELY BE STOPPEd for not only Hitler and obama have done such things---but so other dictator thugs Chavez and Castro.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC, what is wrong with you people.   Fox&#8217;s story of Obama&#8217;s speech to kids was perfectly legite.  The story was absolutey factual and indeed Obama was forced to change his teaching plan demanding kids answer what they would do to help Obama.   Perhaps, if the bots and supposed journalists at ABC bothered to read a bit of history such as Hitlers targeting of youth to help him in 1933 Germany&#8230;.that journalist at ABC would understand why such demands of Obama of school kids should be very troublesome and why Obama had to change his teaching plan once snagged.   ANY PRESIDENT DOING TO THIS KIDS SHOULD IMMEDIATELY BE STOPPEd for not only Hitler and obama have done such things&#8212;but so other dictator thugs Chavez and Castro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan C</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90908</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90908</guid>
		<description>===Anybody ever consider that FauxNews is so darned popular because far right-wingers sit on their butts and watch more television that more educated people?===
There is something to that.
FoxNews has the highest percentage of heavy watchers (8 hours or more) of any of the 24/7 news networks.
Anyone watching that much right wing garbage will eventually believe it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>===Anybody ever consider that FauxNews is so darned popular because far right-wingers sit on their butts and watch more television that more educated people?===<br />
There is something to that.<br />
FoxNews has the highest percentage of heavy watchers (8 hours or more) of any of the 24/7 news networks.<br />
Anyone watching that much right wing garbage will eventually believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SjB</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90904</link>
		<dc:creator>SjB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90904</guid>
		<description>Truly, this president has been correctly labeled by The Nation as, &quot;Whiner-In-Chief.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly, this president has been correctly labeled by The Nation as, &#8220;Whiner-In-Chief.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lfrichar</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90899</link>
		<dc:creator>lfrichar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90899</guid>
		<description>Is Obama just worried about answering questions from O&#039;Reilly?  I would think such a &quot;skilled speaker&quot; would be able to trash O&#039;Reilly.  Sooner or later Obama will have to go on Fox or he will look like a complete idiot.  The most televised President won&#039;t go on one of the most popular shows.  As good as Obama thinks his policies are, I would expect he could defend them against any media hack.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Obama just worried about answering questions from O&#8217;Reilly?  I would think such a &#8220;skilled speaker&#8221; would be able to trash O&#8217;Reilly.  Sooner or later Obama will have to go on Fox or he will look like a complete idiot.  The most televised President won&#8217;t go on one of the most popular shows.  As good as Obama thinks his policies are, I would expect he could defend them against any media hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90895</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90895</guid>
		<description>I read and listen to both sides of the political issues of today. Problem is as long as we allow corporate donations to reelection campaigns and corporate lobbyists to be the only people to be heard by our elected officials, things will always be the same. The politicians only care about saving their jobs. Neither side of the aisle is representing the people who elected them. They represent the big businesses that fill their campaign coffers. This has got to change. Whether they be democrat, republican, liberal, conservative, most are bought and paid for by corporate intrests including insurance companies, banks, drug companies, wall street, and the list goes on. Change this and the american people may finally be heard.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read and listen to both sides of the political issues of today. Problem is as long as we allow corporate donations to reelection campaigns and corporate lobbyists to be the only people to be heard by our elected officials, things will always be the same. The politicians only care about saving their jobs. Neither side of the aisle is representing the people who elected them. They represent the big businesses that fill their campaign coffers. This has got to change. Whether they be democrat, republican, liberal, conservative, most are bought and paid for by corporate intrests including insurance companies, banks, drug companies, wall street, and the list goes on. Change this and the american people may finally be heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justj joey</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90891</link>
		<dc:creator>justj joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/10/white-house-vs-fox-news-part-34/#comment-90891</guid>
		<description>......did you ever think we would reach the day when folks would send in their comments about the White House damning...excluding...call it what you will, a television news network because it is &quot;one sided&quot;....unfair...or, hell, maybe un-American.  Might I suggest that the Obama administration start doing some work...other than the simple PR of the Presidency, and WE will decide who we read and we watch, and we listen to? Stay out of OUR f r e e
domains!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;did you ever think we would reach the day when folks would send in their comments about the White House damning&#8230;excluding&#8230;call it what you will, a television news network because it is &#8220;one sided&#8221;&#8230;.unfair&#8230;or, hell, maybe un-American.  Might I suggest that the Obama administration start doing some work&#8230;other than the simple PR of the Presidency, and WE will decide who we read and we watch, and we listen to? Stay out of OUR f r e e<br />
domains!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>