Abortion Deal Clears Way for Health Care Vote
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: House Democrats reached an agreement on a contentious abortion provision overnight that appears to clear the way for a final vote on health care legislation today. The agreement will allow a vote on an amendment, authored by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., and Rep. Brad Ellsworth, D-Ind., that would bar funds going toward abortion under both the public option and any private plans that participate in the new insurance exchange. A similar amendment was rejected in committee earlier this year. But a group of roughly 40 Democrats who oppose abortion rights threatened to sink the entire health care bill without the provision, which explicitly extends the so-called “Hyde amendment” barring taxpayer dollars going toward abortions to the new entities created under the health care measure. “From day one, my goal has been to ensure federal tax dollars are not used to pay for abortions and to provide Americans with pro-life options on the exchange. And I am proud to be part of an effort to make this goal a reality,” Ellsworth said in a statement. Democratic leadership aides say the agreement puts them in striking distance of securing a majority for the health care reform bill. But, with at least 15 Democrats already saying publicly they’ll vote “no,” the tally will be close. In a critical boost, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops endorsed the amendment today, after a series of meetings with top House leaders last night. The Stupak-Ellsworth amendment goes further than House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other abortion-rights supporters wanted, but House leaders desperately want to pass the bill today. Planned Parenthood put out a scathing statement early this morning condemning the amendment. “This amendment would violate the spirit of health care reform, which is meant to guarantee quality, affordable health care coverage for all, by creating a two-tiered system that would punish women, particularly those with low and modest incomes. Women won’t stand for legislation that takes away their current benefits and leaves them worse off after health care reform than they are today,” said Cecile Richardson, Planned Parenthood’s president.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Great!
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | November 7, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
R.I.P. America
Posted by: Pittsburgh Patriot | November 7, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Why is Hawaii being exempt from having to have this health care bill pushed down their throats? Why does Hawaii only have 8% of their residents uninsured? All they did was mandate all employers must provide coverage to all full time employees. Why dont all the states adopt this law? This would solve the problem without having some crazy 1.4 trillion dollar debt. Pretty simple but affective and if congress does not like this idea it is obvious they want to take over our medical system. Why aren’t we demanding that they demonstrate they are even capable of cutting 500 billion dollars in waste from the Medicare program.
Posted by: marie | November 7, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
ON THE ISSUE OF ABORTION IF IT’S YOUR CHOICE WHY DO WE HAVE TO PAY!!!!!!!!!!!
If the American Government is for the people I would like to know which people? that is!
Posted by: Eileen-fire2lite | November 7, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
How nice. Our lawmakers are writing legislation that doesn’t include consideration for the health of the woman. In other words – I guess even if she’s going to die this is out. Even if she’s pregnant with a child that can’t survive birth she’s not covered. If she’s raped she’s not covered. I have been transported back to the old days.
Posted by: secondlook | November 7, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
This is an idea whose time has come. Thank you Mr President.
Posted by: Scott | November 7, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Eileen-fire2lite wrote: “ON THE ISSUE OF ABORTION IF IT’S YOUR CHOICE WHY DO WE HAVE TO PAY!!!!!!!!!!!
If the American Government is for the people I would like to know which people? that is!”
==============================
You DON’T have to pay. Since the bill “would bar funds going toward abortion under both the public option and any private plans” can’t you tell the answer to your own question?
Posted by: The_Mick | November 7, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Enjoy the house victory, cause it will never pass the senate with a public option.
Posted by: mark | November 7, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Ahhh! Amerika! Where the law of the land is a paper democracy! The (vocal) minority always rules!
Posted by: Vicki | November 7, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
OK. I’m pro-choice, however, I can agree with not covering abortion. After all, how many abortions do you need? I would hope you would only need one in your lifetime.
Posted by: Cindy | November 7, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I’m for this as long as birth control is covered. I’m tired of women getting the short end of the stick when it comes to healthcare. Mammograms, pap smears and birth control should be covered just like men are covered for penile disfunction and other male reporductive illnesses/diseases.
Posted by: Josephine | November 7, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Although I consider myself a liberal in most circumstances I do support the amendment that would not cover elective abortion. The Pro-Choice is spouting off about the health of the mother. In cases of the health of the mother abortion is allowed by the amendment (threat to the mother’s health, rape and incest). Most abortions are elective and unnecessary. Why should American tax payers pay for elective abortions for individuals who don’t practice birth control? Healthy women who are pregnant and find that fact inconvenient can pay for their own abortions. Organizations like Planned Parenthood can raise funds from their supporters to help defray the full costs of pregnancy termination.
Posted by: Paul Wall | November 7, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
I’m very confused. I have no problem with taxpayers not paying for elective abortions even though I’m basically pro-choice. But I thought that the law ALREADY didn’t cover that procedure unless the mother’s life was in danger, the other was a rape/incest victim, etc. So I can’t figure out what this new amendment means. Does it mean the government stop paying for those termination now?
Does anyone really understand this?
I’m also with *secondlook*. There is no way I want to pay for some old geezer to get “performance pills”!!! I’d FAR rather pay for an abortion for a rape victim.
Posted by: xtch3 | November 7, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Abortion deal clears way?
Wait a minute!
Section 222. Essential Benefits Package Defined.
Page 109, line 7-line 8, (e) Abortion Coverage Prohibited As Part Of Minimum Benefits Package.
Hmmm, Minimum Benefits Package, gee, could that mean that it will not be part of the government insurance since the ‘Public Option’ would be considered a minimum benefits package. Just what part of “Abortion Coverage Prohibited as part of minimum Benefits Package” do Republicans and Tea Party enthusiats ‘Don’t Understand?’
Posted by: Angie | November 7, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
What about the baby’s choice?
Posted by: Max | November 7, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Sorry Paul, I see you agreed to that.
I have anger issues on this topic. I’ll own it.
I apologize.
Posted by: secondlook | November 7, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
So what? Either a court challenge will overturn that part of the legislation, activists will force the government to provided Federal funds through some other government mechanism to compensate, or some rider on another 2000-page piece of pork-filled legislation that no one has time to read will reinstate it. Nothing in Washington changes – it’s the same tired political sleight-of hand with a new set of smoke, mirrors, and illusionists.
Posted by: Publius | November 7, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
The people in Congress are so entrenched in the game, they have lost all perspective. I cannot believe grown people act so stupidly and selfishly as to create such hardships for the people in this country, with absolutely no thought to any ramifications. Except of course, they voted themselves exempt from participating in any health care overhaul. I hate them all and wish them all great hardships in their lives.
Posted by: vlk | November 7, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I don’t understand why it wouldnt be covered. WE ALL make mistakes and if something was to happen to a woman one day and she was raped and couldnt afford to get an abortion then what she has to remember what happened to her for the rest of her life by looking at that child. You guys dont understand. AND MOST PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD AN ABORTION DO USE BIRTH CONTROL….ignorant idiots.
Posted by: Harderthanyouthink | November 7, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
On the issue of illegal immigration? Have you heard anything?
Posted by: Lesly | November 7, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Section 222. Essential Benefits Package Defined. Page 110, line 9-line 16, (A) ‘Abortion for which Public funding is Prohibited’.
Gee, this talks of which is already under law so there is no change in the law that already exist.
While the Section 222. Essential Benefits Package Defined. Page 110, line 17-line 24, (B) ‘Abortions for which public funding is allow’
Gee, and this talks of which is already in the law so there is no change in the law that already exist.
In both cases if refers back to the law that already exist and that the Republicans have already passed.
So there is no change regarding the laws of Abortion in the Health Insurance Reform Act regarding public funding.
So what lies are the Republicans and the Tea Party trying to spread now?
Posted by: Angie | November 7, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Did the 72 hour waiting period already begin, with the amendments?
Posted by: fishguru00 | November 7, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Section 222. Essential Benefits Package Defined. Page 110, line 9-line 16, (A) “Abortion For Which Public Funding Is Prohibited.”
This is clearly according to what the law Passed by Republicans already states and nothing is changed regarding Public Funding Prohibited in those cases.
So what part of Page 110, line 9-line 16 Don’t Republicans and Tea party enthusiats don’t understand?
Posted by: Angie | November 7, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Wait a minute….President Obama in his Sept. 10 address to Congress said that “no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions.”???? So, why does this bill include funding for abortions? Oh, that’s right….he LIED!
Just like he lied that his plan won’t add “one dime” to the deficit. This plan’s recent score by the CBO is 3 TRILLION DOLLARS. See, what he’s doing is saying “his plan”…so technically he’s not lying because HE doesn’t have a plan. This is Nancy Pelosi’s plan, but he’ll vote for it anyway.
We CANNOT trust our government…this is all about power. Which is why they’re trying to rush it through. This was never about providing health care to the uninsured and lowering costs. GOV’T has never lowered the cost of anything!!!!
Posted by: MLM411 | November 7, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Obama and those tunnel vision Democrats
sold their souls to the big insurance
companies. This will ultimately ban abortion in the U.S.
Posted by: bokwop | November 7, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
How did this 2000 page, 1.2 Trillion monstronsity come down to an abortion debate? What about the money? What about the jobs lost in the private sector by those who work for insurance companies or doctors or businesses that can’t afford the additonal taxes. What about an American’s “Right to Choose their doctor, their insurance, their hospital”. In this bill, private insurance will wither at 2013. It will be a government option. We will all be trapped in a system run by bureaucrats, a one-size-fits-all healthcare. This is not America. There will still be people denied care because it’s too expensive, just like Canada or England. So what will we have gained except a bigger bill and more government. It’s preposterous!
Posted by: Gary | November 7, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Nothing in the Health care reform changes what is in the Abortion laws regarding Public Funding.
Page 110, line 9-16, (A) Abortions For Which Public Funding Is Prohibited. Clearly states that what is Not allowed in public funding is according to the laws already on the books.
Page 110, line 17-24, (B) Abortions For Which Public Funding Is Allowed.
Clearly states what the Law already on the Books regarding Public funding is not changed, but only according to what the law that already exist states.
There is no change in the law regarding public funding of Abortions.
Posted by: Angie | November 7, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Why don’t the dems care about the burden we are passing on to our children? It is the most selfish lot I’ve ever seen.
Posted by: jonny | November 7, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I love how they (congress) said it will lower cost. How much lower what is a dollar amount (including raised taxes on everyone)? This will never lower cost. We will just be taxed higher.
Posted by: coastlinecascott | November 7, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
It’s nice that they have gained the support of Catholic Church. This will mean a great deal to all practicing Catholics in this country. I am hoping this bill passes. After the embarrassing spectacle put on by the Tea Party and the Republicans who supported this I am hoping for resolution that will stop the drama and lies we saw and heard two days ago. The holocaust posters and the open displays of bigotry only serve to make the Republican Party look bad. Lets hear from Republicans that have class, not these over the edge Right Wing drama queens and kings.
Posted by: Sharonkathleen | November 7, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
It’s ALWAYS the rape scenario that’s mentioned to advocate ‘choice’ and never the drunken whoring scenario. Which is more likely? 0.00001% of people don’t want abortions from rape to be allowed. Yet that is how things are spun. It’s a tired and useless spin. Here’s a suggestion for health care: CREATE JOBS AND LET PEOPLE FOOT THE BILL THEMSELVES THROUGH THEIR OWN HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE.
Posted by: me | November 7, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
People who are for this 2000+ page bill have no idea how sorry they are going to be. The freakin’ bill is so large, I can’t even bring it up on my computer to read it. There is no way the people in the House have had time to read it & understand it – but what else is new.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | November 7, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
To all of you pro-life people. I hope you take care of all the children that the parents dont want. You preach pro-life but don’t explain what the women is to do once she has the child and no money to take care of it and no love in their heart to give to the unwanted child.
Posted by: Jeanette | November 7, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Great, this is way past due. One special interest group, Abortion rights advocates, shouldn’t get to piggy back their highly controversial agenda to deperately needed health care reform. It was ridiculous in the first place to risk this important legislation in this way. If it so important, then let the abortion provision stand on its own and have a separate vote on it. Common sense is back, at least for a while.
It’s now time for the faithful to quit transferring their faith to the conservatives, and prove that they understand that biblical principles go far beyond the short-sighted Republican agenda. We have the abortion provision, now support the bill!!!!
Posted by: Daryl D | November 7, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
secondlook wrote, “How nice. Our lawmakers are writing legislation that doesn’t include consideration for the health of the woman. In other words – I guess even if she’s going to die this is out. Even if she’s pregnant with a child that can’t survive birth she’s not covered. If she’s raped she’s not covered. I have been transported back to the old days.”
Oh pooh! Too many women use abortion as a convenient means of birth control. Those women will still have plenty of options. Don’t be so dramatic.
Posted by: JustMe | November 7, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Here’s my 2 cents.
I am pro-choice but I don’t think I could ever bring myself to have one. However, I am a single mother and I understand how incredibly difficult that can be. I believe no one should have to go through that if they aren’t ready or willing to. I don’t understand why you wouldn’t want the health care plan to provide abortions for women who want them. Think about it, if women don’t have the option to have an abortion that would cost taxpayers, I don’t even know how much probably roughtly $400?, then you are going to be spending around $10,000 to pay for the woman to have the child and who knows how much if the woman has to go on welfare to support the child she didn’t want in the first place. Sure, she could put the child up for adoption and I would support this choice over abortion but it is not my choice. Your argument makes no sense.
Posted by: Elizabeth | November 7, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
The entire bill should be aborted and anyone stupid enough to vote for it should not be called a Representative. They should be replaced with someone with a brain.
Posted by: DadR | November 7, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Lets not lose sight of today’s mission in the overall scheme of things. We’ll never all agree on every single point but if you care about reform at all, we must get a bill out of the House. It will not be the final product by a long shot. Any house bill puts the ball in the Senate’s court and the sooner the better. The Senate is the tuff nut and if the House waits any later in the year, the Senate won’t get it done this year and if not this year, likely never. The Republicans’ plan is to delay, get it into an election year and then kill it for another generation. There are sincere opponents of abortion, immigration, etc but most don’t care whether its these issues or chicken pox or whatever – just confuse and raise fear and keep any progress at bay.
Details can and will change in the Senate and again in Conference and later in the courts. The real key is to move the process forward
Posted by: Marv | November 7, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
I’m a Democrat & while I support choice for women, I am fine with this. If a woman can’t get an abortion, I am fine with giving her welfare for 18yrs and paying for the child’s education and medical care that whole time too. Either way it screws a Republican, so I’m good.
Posted by: Ha Ha Ha Ha | November 7, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
I must say haha, I believe you are in the minority. Most repubs I know think abortion should be outlawed and welfare should be abolished. I don’t know who said but I agree, conservatives only care about you when you’re inutero and then don’t give a rats ass until you’re old enough to go fight the wars they won’t send their kids to fight.
Posted by: Elizabeth | November 7, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
YES TO PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY WHICH IS MISSING MUCH THESE DAYS. THE DAYS OF EXCESSES ARE OVER!!!!!! I am glad abortion is off the table. We taxpayers should not be responsible for people’s “mistakes”. A child is never a mistake in my opinion.
Posted by: cheri | November 7, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Nobody seems to care about what God wants anymore.
Posted by: cheri | November 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
IF YOU THINK HEALTH INSURANCE IS EXPENSIVE NOW, WAIT TILL ITS FREE
Posted by: DEAN | November 7, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Cheri, if you want to believe in god knock yourself out but you can’t push your beliefs on to anyone else. If you’re pro-life then don’t have an abortion. I value children as well, I have one. I know child abuse is not restricted to any one class but have you ever stopped to think if child abusers had had the option to have abortions they wouldn’t be beating their children today? Let’s face it, many people choose not to have children because they simply don’t want them. These people should not be forced to have children they don’t want that result from accidental pregnancies. No form of birth control is 100% effective and accidents do happen. I’m not talking about the women who use abortion as their bc, they are psychotic. But those are the minority of those who seek abortion.
Posted by: Elizabeth | November 7, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
cheri – Nobody seems to care what Mickey Mouse wants either…. both are fictional characters, albeit “god” does have a bit more age on the mouse.
Posted by: Laughin_All_The_Way | November 7, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
“Desperately want to pass” today. Why ? What is the rush ? Given this healthcare fiasco represents 1/6th of the economy , and couple that with the Wall street financial crowd, we’ll be bankrupt before the next election.
Posted by: cfiman | November 7, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Cheri: “Nobody seems to care about what God wants any more.” Are you serious? God gets what God wants. If He didn’t want there to be abortion there would be none. Isn’t what “God wants” simply a convenient way to push your agenda onto others? I believe in God and I don’t use His name to score cheap political points.
Posted by: Paul Wall | November 7, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Laughin_All_The_Way | Nov 7, 2009 2:40:54 PM—Who cares about republican politicians? Like they care about this nation. They are all paid off by health care/insurance lobbyists to defeat accessible health care to all Americans. This bill will SAVE trillions in the long run while republicans want to do nothing which will COST trillions in the long run.
Posted by: Paul Wall | November 7, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Sinces the Catholic church is so active in creating public policy through political activity, do they pay taxes, or are they still tax exempt? What of us who are not followers of this church? Must we be forced to follow their beliefs?
Posted by: Carol Sylvia | November 7, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Although I am definitely pro-choice and feel a woman’s right to an abortion must be protected (I’ve also had an abortion more than 20 years ago), I think we need a health care bill NOW with a public option or co-op option. Whatever it takes is a good start. If no federal $ for abortion guarantees that folks won’t lose their homes when they get sick, that’s a sacrifice we need to be willing to make to move health care reform along. Abortions aren’t too expensive. Condoms are available cheap or free almost everywhere in the USA.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl | November 7, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Another defeat for the rights of the individual provided under the law that make abortions legal. Closed minded, tunnel visioned, linear thinking politicians once again prove that the law and peoples rights don’t matter. Although the bigger picture view will be accomplished, proof that idiots are alive and well in Washington is glaringly apparent.
Posted by: mrgmorgan56 | November 7, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
I think every “right-to-lifer” (anti-choice) person should be REQUIRED to adopt a child out of the foster care system.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl | November 7, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Carol Sylvia – We need to do TWO things. We need to 1) tax ALL churches, as they are no different than any other business in America, and 2) rescind the tax deduction for “contributions.”
Absent the FINANCIAL rewards they’ve enjoyed for centuries, these industries will dry up in short order.
Posted by: Laughin_All_The_Way | November 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Let them do as they wish. The voters will speak in 2010 and 2012
Posted by: Steve | November 7, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
If taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay for abortions because they feel it’s the woman’s fault, then by that logic they also shouldn’t have to pay for anything done to someone who smokes, eats every fatty, sugary food they can stuff their face with (the entire south and midwest), or someone who engages in other high risk activities that cause taxpayers to pay for their bad behavior. But since the people making these laws are fat, smoke, do drugs, and have improper sexual relations with interns, children, high-priced prostitutes (taxpayers pay for that too) and all that, they’ll cut out any funding to underpriviledged and especially minority women whenever they can. Fantastic. Can’t wait for this to pass and to get sh!+ on by these stupid pigs again.
Posted by: Ginny | November 7, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Now let’s watch Lieberman Mr Cigna, and Evan Bayh
Mr Wellpoint destroy the whole thing.
Posted by: hybridhealthcare | November 7, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Just curious, is there any country where women’s rights are recognized completely or at least equally to those of men? Is there one single country? A single one where women’s interests are protected or at least represented fairly in government and social decision making? Is there ANY one?
Posted by: Ginny | November 7, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
What upsets me about the ani-abortion Democrats and their pundits is that they do not want tax payers to have to pay for or go towards abortions. What I find funny those are my tax dollars too and I have no problem with a woman making a choice and under their health care plan if it is offered be allowed to use it. Because what happens when you have a victem of rape, or incest needing to possibly use their health care for this treatment, you take away their right to a payment that they may not be able to afford. There need’s to be an addendem added that there will be an exception to these kind of cases.
Posted by: Katie McClure | November 7, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
On Hannity’s America someone commented that there may be as many as 800 amendments to the Pelosicare bill that no one has read!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | November 7, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Abortion wasn’t in the bill, yet Planned Parenthood is furious that it has now been taken out?
Could it possibly be that we have been lied to by Obama and Pelosi somewhere along the way?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | November 7, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I still don’t believe the Democrats have the 218 votes needed to pass the bill in the House. They may be close, but there will be some defections in the end. Too many people, and not only Republicans, are opposed to the passage of this bill. I predict it will not pass today if a vote is taken, nor will it pass later.
Posted by: Amanda Moserski | November 7, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
This is exactly the problem that Obama KNEW he’s face with the public option issue. It had nothing to do with health care – but rather all the “other” issues that tag along with it when it becomes a government plan.
If the abortion issue ever becomes resolved here – and it may kill the whole bill do it its own controversy – we then will have all the illegal immigration activists take the podium.
Pelosi just had to have it her way! I’m surprised Obama let her do it. No better way to ruin a reform bill than to tack all these tangential issues onto it. The Democrats got greedy. They had health care reform in their hands and could have gotten it through. Once a “base package” was enacted, you could have added the issue laden public option. But you can’t fight for health care – and then deal with abortion rights and immigration reform at the same time.
It’s hard to believe that these people in Congress all these years didn’t know they were opening up Pandora’s box!
Posted by: JonF | November 7, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
For Republicans to take back control of Congress in 2010, democrats must use their votes now to pass this legislation that a majority of voting Americans do not want. So, everyone who has angst over this, just relax. We’re going to vote next November and we’re going to take back Congress in 2010 and then the White House in 2012 and repeal this Guinness-sized bill that democrats are cramming down our throats now and give our nation that’s supposed to be on an economic diet the affordable bill it wants and needs right now. In the vernacular of this moment: “Chill, everybody, who doesn’t want a government that can’t even make a H1N1 vaccine in sufficient doses for the masses to manage our national public health care system. We all know what we’re gonna next November and then in November 2012, and we will.”
Posted by: Rob | November 7, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Katie, you were not born with a baby in you. You can not have a baby with a man being involved. Therefor, a baby is not your body. It amazes me to think that women think that a baby is their sole possession. Women were trusted with the awesome responsibility of birthing a human being in their body yet some are so cavalier with that responsibility. Its funny that you want money to keep a baby and money to get rid of it. Women even want money to carry a baby for someone else. The common denominator is that you want Money! My apologies to all the wonderful moms who understand their role of human birth that love and nurture their children unselfishly. To them, children are not a possession or a burden, but without a doubt, the greatest earthly achievement bar none is to be a great parent.
In a 100 or so years, science will allow babies to be born outside the womb and relieve those women the burden of having to endure the trouble of pregnancy. Then men will be able to have a baby without the stress of dealing with the possessiveness and illogical rules that women have burdened men with. The tables will turn, and then where will women be without their legal crutch of Alimony and child support! Viva La Revolution!
Posted by: Bigshott | November 7, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Now that the government will not be paying for abortions, will they pay for the problems caused by unwanted pregnancies and botched illegal abortions?
Posted by: stu | November 7, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
miss type above sorry,
should read : you cannot have a baby WITHOUT a man being involved
Posted by: Bigshott | November 7, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
I am sure all the pro life will be more than happy to put money aside to support all these babies that will be born by force not choice and will go on welfare along with their mothers, food stamps, housing medicaid etc, so then don’t whine about your taxes going up. I guess you don’t mind your premiums going up each year to fund the vacations, big cars and planes etc for all the big shots in the health care industry. ) had a premature birth, baby in intensive care in an incubator for three months, mother in and out with complications from a c-section, the cost ZERO, the place ENGLAND, a 42 year old in with brain damage, six operations, still in the hospital for two months the cost ZERO, the place ENGLAND<,both in a hospital run by national health.My son who needs back surgery and is a US citizen the same surgery in England $20,000 in the States $60,000, he doesn't have insurance so will have to pay privately
Posted by: irene | November 7, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
irene, why do you assume that all babies
born because a mother couldn’t get a government paid for abortion will end up on welfare? some just might become scientists who find a cure for cancer, some might become doctors who give back to the community by providing inexpencive care, some may become police officers, military men and woman or congressman/woman or presidents. Why must people always use the fear factor to make their points?
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | November 7, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
If men had to be pregnant, speaking against abortion would be blasphemous. These decisions are made by men who have no clue what it is to go through anything like that. And I mean they want to save money, I’m quite sure that abortions are far far far cheaper then all those prenatal visits plus hospital stays for childbirth. This is a decision made solely on religious beliefs. From what I remember we are supposed to have a clear separation of church and state.
Posted by: Lib | November 7, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Of course the Catholic Church would support the Health insurance bill, because, as it is currently written, the Catholic church will save millions of dollars on providing for all of the illegal Hispanic members of their churches!!!!!
Posted by: sasyphras | November 7, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Bigshot, your right about us not being born with fetus’s in us. I have two great young adult children and am proud of how I raised them, my daughter is a strong independant women working to become a pgotographer as well as a Volunteer Fire Fighter. My son, he will be a Senior in High school next year and upon graduation plan’s to enrol in ROTC to get his degree and become a Marine Officer. I am pround to say that I raised these two wonderful spirits with no help from their father. Who by the way at every turn did not pay child support, or medical of any kind and at times dropped off the face of the earth to avoid either. There are plenty of men out there that walk away from their children, because they think it’s ok to play but not to pay. Then you Mr. Bigshot, come along and may be one of the one’s that condemn a woman because she has to go on welfare for assistance for her children. If you are anti abortion and think that having a child is heaven sent, then you should also be protesting the gene testing that is preventing future children from being concieved, becuase they carry the gene for Downs Syndrome, Autism, Mental Retardation, or other genetic disorders. You can’t be anti-abortion and not be a hyprocite about the other.
Posted by: Katie McClure | November 7, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Too bad congress could not be ABORTED,,,,,,they are a BIG part of the four pronged problem,,,the others being the insurance industry, the health care system and pharmaceutical companies, they are all infected with Greed,,,and the fertilizer that makes it ALL grow in cost to the American people,,,,,The all mighty LOBBY DOLLAR. There is no solution to keep things affordable if ALL parties involved do not make concessions,,,they cannot expect to maintain the GREED and waste they commit, and have the tax payers pick up the whole tab. Congress is responsible for it is they who have crawled into bed with the lobbyists from ALL these sectors,,BOTH parties,,,,,,,When will Americans wake up and see the real truth as it is,,,,BOTH parties are guilty of ALL the mess we are in, to support these crooks any longer would be insanity. They will NEVER represent the people as long as the are legislative prostitutes,,,why should they bribe the people,,,they can just rob us through “Taxation Without Representation”, give our tax dollars to corporate America in exchange for BILLIONS in lobby dollars for personal and party profit,,,they are traitors and ANYONE who supports them are accomplices.
Posted by: tincup 56 | November 7, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
I do not want my tax dollars used for abortion. But the government and planned parenthood will find a way around it and use them anyway just like they do now.
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Posted by: secondlook | Nov 7, 2009 11:06:04 AM “”How nice. Our lawmakers are writing legislation that doesn’t include consideration for the health of the woman. In other words – I guess even if she’s going to die this is out. Even if she’s pregnant with a child that can’t survive birth she’s not covered. If she’s raped she’s not covered. I have been transported back to the old days.”" ** Your remarks are slanted. The legislation does not deny women health care. It is just denying that our tax dollars not be used for abortions(unwanted baby). No one said anything about letting women die. As far as rape, that is a despicable act, and for the baby that would not survive birth due to no fault of the mother. These are terrible situations to be in and I would not want to be there. But these are situations that are not the responsibility of the government or anyone else’s if that person does not have insurance.
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Posted by: Jeanette | Nov 7, 2009 1:47:03 PM “To all of you pro-life people. I hope you take care of all the children that the parents dont want. You preach pro-life but don’t explain what the women is to do once she has the child and no money to take care of it and no love in their heart to give to the unwanted child.”*****First, they are not much of a parent(s) if they do not want the child they created and brought into this world. Second, there is always adoption if they do not want the child they created and brought into this world. Third, if they have no love for this child they should have never have created it and brought into this world.
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Posted by: Elizabeth | Nov 7, 2009 2:34:05 PM*****Your statement that if child abusers had had the option to have an abortion they would not be beating their child/children today is totally ridiculous. Abuse is a power thing to them. Did they sit around and say “Oh I think I will get an abortion so I want beat my future children.”
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Posted by: veggiegrrrl | Nov 7, 2009 3:06:58 PM***Abortion is not a health related issue. It is a choice you make for a choice you made.
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Posted by: Ginny | Nov 7, 2009 3:36:34 PM******What does where a person lives have to do with anything? I assume you are from the West or up North. Are you saying that there are not overeaters, smokers, drug users that live there? If these same type of people are making these laws and trying to pass this health care reform, I say vote their butts out because I don’t think they are qualified to be doing the running of our country.
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
HERE IS THE LAW THAT ALLOWS FOR ABORTIONS IN THE EVENT OF RAPE OR INCEST. A law called the Hyde amendment — which must be renewed annually — bars federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape, incest or if the mother’s life is in danger. An abortion is a choice if you get pregnant by any other means other than rape or incest. You made the choice you pay for the choice.
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Posted by: irene | Nov 7, 2009 4:49:22 PM “I am sure all the pro life will be more than happy to put money aside to support all these babies that will be born by force not choice and….”***I would prefer my tax dollars going to take care of baby “forced” to live (as you said) rather than going toward aborting one before it has a chance to live.
Posted by: d | November 7, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
“The health of a woman”? She’s killing her baby, and no one forced her to get pregnant in most of these situations! I’m a woman and I don’t want to pay to help do this. And why should we be forced if we don’t even BELIEVE in abortion? Pay for it yourselves. It isn’t even a health issue, so it shouldn’t be on the bill.
Good point Marie.
Posted by: G | November 7, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Harderthanyouthink-Abortions occurring because of rape are under 2% according to the statistics. As for “mistakes” by getting pregnant… we are not responsible for others’ actions and we should not have to pay. Especially when I do not agree with abortion, why should I be forced to support it by paying my tax dollars toward it?
Posted by: R | November 7, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Take it from a person that comes from a country that has totally free medical, America is better of for it. It still fall short of what it could be. But think of it like this. You should feel better to think you tax dollars are going towards the health of the people who cant afford private health care, then politicians tax payer funded trip to a holiday resort in Europe so they cant talk shop for about 1 hour followed by a week of sitting by the pool. Abortion can come later. You know it will its just like everything in America its little steps forward.
Posted by: shaun | November 8, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Govt Run Health Care is NOT Constitutional, so our freedom to health care is being stolen from us by Tryants! The Govt Run Health Care is about Control and Not Health Care.
Also on the subject of Abortion…it is nothing but the Murder of innocent unborn children.
Posted by: Neil Barrett | November 8, 2009, 6:16 am 6:16 am
And on the subject of our President…think he really cares about you? If he thinks it’s OK to kill innocent unbord children, why would he care about your health???
Posted by: Neil Barrett | November 8, 2009, 6:18 am 6:18 am
Term limits, term limits, term limits….2010,2012
Posted by: tired | November 8, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
vote them all out!
Posted by: tired | November 8, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
wow george get control of the boys- no one wants to listen to people so rudely talking over each other….us listeners can’t decipher a word…..no wonder it takes so long in congress…everyone speaks, no one listens…I’m changing the channel
Posted by: carrie | November 8, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Woohoo! as an American on Unemployment therefore not eligible for medicare and not able to afford a doctor or insurance Maybe I will be able to get healthcare for my fibromygia ridden body! Maybe I will be able to get the medications it takes for me to live day to day and pay my living expenses at the same time instead of having to choose.
Posted by: Wendy | November 8, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm