By Jacqueline Klingebiel

Nov 7, 2009 4:18pm

Baby Joins House Health Care Debate

Well this is a first…ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports:
 
Rep. John Shadegg hoisted a cute, bald little baby today on the House floor, employing a unique prop to argue that the Democrats health reform bill will be paid for by future generations. “I wish this was my granddaughter,” said Shadegg. “This is Maddie (the seven month old daughter of his chief of staff) but Maddie believes in freedom.” “Maddie likes America because we have freedom here and Maddie believes in patient choice health care. She has come here to say she doesn't want government to take over health care. she wants to keep her plan. He went on: “Maddie knows if this bill passes, she knows her mom's health care will go away and won't be around for five years. If the bill passes then no more health care for her mom because it has to change. Maddie wants patient choice. She doesn't want her mom's premiums to go up. She doesn't want her mom's taxes to go up by $730 billion, do you, Maddie?” he asked the baby. “She wants America's health insurance companies to have to compete with each other. she believes in choices. but most of all, she says, don't tax me to pay for health care that you guys want. If you want health care, pay for it yourself, because it's not fair to pass your health care bills on to me and my grandchildren.” The display brought a rebuke from Rep. David Obey from Wisconsin, who was presiding over the chamber. “The chair is aware to happy have the guest referred to but the gentleman is reminded not to refer to guests of the house,” said Obey. Rep. Henry Waxman, who is running the debate for the Democrats, was less kind to Shadegg. That was a remarkable child,” said Waxman of Maddie, “and a great ventriloquist,” he said of Shadegg, for holding the baby at the podium and speaking for her.UPDATE: It was not as overt as Shadegg giving his floor speech through the baby, but Democrat Pete Stark brought up his two children, twins Andrew and Hannah (age 8), when he gave a speech supporting the health care bill.

“I encourage each of my colleagues to join me in voting yes and I can assure you these guys,” he said motioning to the kids, “aren't going to have to pay for it in the future.”

User Comments

How pathetic to use a baby like that to try to fight something that will benefit generations to come. How would he like that little baby to die for lack of affordable healthcare or that baby’s parents to go bankrupt because of huge medical bills? What kind of future would that be for a baby growing up in this country? By the time he grows up there will be no such thing as affordable health care unless reform is passed. We need to pass this bill for the future of that little one and all the other children of this country.

Posted by: Donald | November 7, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

how dare he presume to speak for an infant?! he was certainly free to say that his aide didn’t want the bill because he was afraid that his child would pay for it. pretending that he was aware of the conscious thoughts of a baby makes him look like an idiot. what state is he from?

Posted by: justsane | November 7, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Donald- how do you know this bill will benefit generations to come? What if this bill is so costly that it bankrupts the country and only the rich like our politicians can afford health care leaving you with rationed medical services. You make statements that you can not guarantee. Is that worth risking your life for?

Posted by: tamika | November 7, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

John Shadegg’s top two industry donors are “health professionals” and “insurance” who gave him about 50,000 in the 2009-2010 cycle (see opensecrets). No word on how much of that he’s giving to Maddie.

Posted by: Ray | November 7, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Pitiful….indoctrinating hate, greed selfishness and pitting a baby against other Americans….Sorry and shameful. It was a sickly looking baby at that. And “Maddie” would probably pay 2/3 of her paycheck for insurance unless she was born with a silver spoon….that’s likely since her parents allowed her to be used for their point of view.

Posted by: sara | November 7, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Disgusting and inapropriate no matter which side you’re on. And can you imagine someone in congress actually changing their minds based on someone flashing a baby at them? You read the bill and then do whats right for the country.

Posted by: sarah mcnulty | November 7, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

What a disgraceful tactic, even for a politician. And where were the parents? What kind of parents would allow their child to be exploited like that?

Posted by: El Pajaro | November 7, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

hey how about the dem who had his two children up there? where is your outrage for that. You think two eight yr. olds can read this bill and support it? Get a clue whats good for the goose and all that. Oh wait, he is a dem so it’s okay but not for a repub. Like I said before, get a clue.

Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | November 7, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

We need healthcare reform because if you don’t think you’re paying for the people that don’t have it because they can’t afford due to job loss and the people that do work but wages are too low and premiums too high then you’re kidding yourselves. People will still fill emergency rooms and go to the doctor and not be able to pay the bills and guess who pays for it??? You when the insurance companies raise your premiums to make up for the loss. Credit issues don’t worry people anymore as they are already losing there houses, can’t afford to pay their bills which are also medical bills. Wise up people social medicine works great in other countries, there isn’t substandard medicine or medical treatment…everybody pays, everybody gets taken care of EQUALLY. There isn’t a perfect answer for everything but there should be a requirement that we can get medical/dental treatment it should be a given. And people feel that obese or ill people should pay more…give it a though some are in that situation because of poverty, it’s cheaper to buy that mac & cheese than the fruit &/or vegetables. Processed food is cheaper and filling and causes obesity and illness so it’s a catch 22..like a said no perfect solution, but everyone deserves medical/dental access…

Posted by: kay | November 7, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

I read one article where those who “Can’t afford” insurance will be heavily subsidized (my tax dollars at work). Those who have employer provided (yet pay dearly for it) insurance will get no subsidies (and we’ll be paying for others to get it).
SO – the family with 70K in income, will be paying something like 15K. OK – well my hubby and I make about 70K a year together so after taxes we get to keep about 40K. Now – we’re going to pay 15K with no help plus higher taxes to pay for others….So I imagine at least half our net income will be ours. How wonderful to it will be to work full time, and part time jobs and still get to keep maybe 30K of our salary. 3 people on that…woot woot, lets plan a cruise and overseas vacations. Eventually lying back and taking minimum wage jobs will be more lucrative. Nice Gov’t that will allow that to happen.

Posted by: Charlotte | November 7, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Hey Ray — Did you check to see how many Dems are being “cared for” by the trial lawyers who don’t want tort reform? They victimize the victims (ambulance chasers) and costs us all plenty.
Doctors pay dearly for malpractice — there are not too many doctors who try to make mistakes — but it happens. But they all pay — and the trial lawyers get rich rich rich. Thank you Dems for no tort reform. Hypocrites.

Posted by: pcafe | November 8, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

“Doctors pay dearly for malpractice — there are not too many doctors who try to make mistakes — but it happens.”
And instead of trying to give them a free pass we should be looking at ways to enforce proper medical standards. Like medical boards that actually police doctors with multiple “bad outcomes” instead of protecting them or ignoring them.
Like doctors that decide to have a couple of drinks even though they are on-call, because they don’t think anyone will need them overnight. When you say “it happens” are you including those cases in your assessment? ..or just heroic TV doctors?
Doctors are humans and sometimes instead of making small boo-boo’s they really screw up royally.
You guys claim to be on the side of “the people” so let the people hear the evidence and make a decision – not the politicians.

Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 8, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Republicans make ridiculous arguments. First they claim govt will provide mediocre services and quote the postal system as the example, but then claim that public option will bankrupt private insurance companies. I wonder why ? if govt’s plan is so pathetic, why would anyone opt for it? and if no one opts for it, why would private companies go bankrupt ?
I wonder who they really care ? American people or health insurance companies ? if the private system was so good , why doesnt everyone have health care in the “best” nation on earth ? why does health care in US rank 37th among all nations on the planet? and no one has ever fought against the term “pre-existing condition”

Posted by: fromCA | November 8, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

“I wonder who they really care ? American people or health insurance companies ?”
All they really care about is saying the worst thing possible about the people that kicked their tails in the last election. To them, nothing is reasonable unless they get the credit, nothing is worth doing that might help the country when the other party is in power and nothing is too silly or slanderous to say as long as it’s directed at their favorite targets.

Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 8, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

How pathetic to ignore the real debate. The lawmakers passed laws in the past that put us into this health care crisis and are deflecting the blame to the private sector. When the government effort falls on its face (like everything they try to micro-manage) who will they blame? Will they blame their short-sited predecessors, the private sector that had be railroaded into being the scapegoat, the oppositions warnings that would be claimed as self-fulfilling when they take power, or will there be anything be left of our nation that won’t be foreign owned or controlled? There was a baby raised to make a point. But the point is lost since the future reality is considered too extreme to think possible. This nation is on its way to collapse because those driving are on a wreckless joy ride.

Posted by: TX_MBell | November 8, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

It took politicans DECADES to ‘craft’ laws that has affected Americans adversely…the president has to unravel this decades old mess……Now this is why our country is on the path of collapse…..I remember the “trickled-down” economics of the 1980′s….I remember my neighborhood being cared for and proud and “loyal” workers to their companies…..until all were “dragged” from under them while the Republicans threw Middle Class Americans under the bus. Yes, I remember! I remember the Deregulation of Large companies and the financial institutions of this country…..leading to lower wages and hanging families out to dry with their “outsourcing” to third world countries for bigger profits….I remember when Americans signed Contracts for credit cards, and the Contracts were binding…..I remember when families were torn apart by “latchkey” kids, because their parents had to work 2 low-wage jobs just to make ends meet…..I remember when companies Took care of those that took care of them! Yes TX_MBell…I’m old enough to Remember what AMERICAN WAS ONCE ABOUT……IT’S PEOPLE!!!!

Posted by: sara | November 8, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Is it also “pathetic” to drag out people in wheel chairs to further the Left’s cause?

Posted by: Kathy | November 8, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

What isn’t? But what I really love was that on the program today, Donna Brazile was seated at the the point (moderate) position opposite Mr. Stephanopoulos . Finally, finally finally, Mr. Stephanopoulos has admitted that in comparison with his own view of world politics, Donna Brazile looks surprisingly moderate.

Posted by: Jim Jordan | November 8, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

George Stephanopoulos’ view of world politics and his “moderator role” are both tainted by his participation in the President’s inner-circle – He is part of the “in-crowd.”

Posted by: pcafe | November 8, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

It won’t be paid for by future generations, as this is the last generation with an opportunity to do anything about the national debt. The debt will double to $24 trillion by 2019, and Obamacare will do its bit to get us there.
The CBO warns the current level of debt to be unsustainable, so what is unsustainable times two? Or, Ux2= Socialism!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | November 8, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

No wonder he has a baby speak for him… Everybody would laugh at this drivel coming out of a middle-aged paid-for lobbyist. You can always pin this lack of judgment on a baby’s ignorance of a reality larger than its playpen!

Posted by: treblig56 | November 8, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

As far as DEBT, if you rolled back the Reagan, GWB tax cuts to the wealthy (and Medicare Part D)the DEBT would be less than half what it is, reducing current expenses (debt repayment and medicare expenses) at least 350 billion $ this year alone.

Posted by: treblig56 | November 8, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

EXACTLY WHAT WE NEED!!!!! Another goverment program! Really, why should I think anymore. I don’t need to work, because I can just get unemployment. Don’t need to work because I’ll get healthcare from the goverment. Don’t need to work because I’ll just use my foodstamps to eat. Have some pride people. Get off your lazy bums and be respectable again!

Posted by: capnbob | November 8, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

One of the biggest conservative arguments against universal health care is that government can’t do it better than the private sector. OK … hands up … all those who think the private sector has been doing a good job on holding health care costs down so far. Hmm. Not many hands.
I spent 8 years as a claims analyst for Blue Cross Blue Shield and know that the private sector has perverted health care. This doesn’t mean I support the current health care proposal, however. But, I do support universal health care.
Whenever this debate comes up, conservatives always point fingers at perceived failures of universal health care in either Canada or the U.K. But they’ll never discuss Australia – which holds health care costs down to 1% of its GDP. They don’t have a perfect system. But private sector health plans don’t have anything to crow about either.

Posted by: Alec | November 8, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

One sixth of our GDP is gobbled up by health care, the most expensive in the world, but do we get the best result? No where close. Republicans oppose reform for two reasons: Insurance Co contributions and they oppose everything the Democrats are for. They don’t care about the country, only regaining power.

Posted by: Javalation | November 8, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Telling us what a helpless baby is thinking about politics and the deficit is probably as good a strategy as the vicious far-right types can come up with. (She looks like a very sweet child, so I expect she’ll grow up to be a Liberal.)

Posted by: Cassandra | November 8, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Reps are just disgusting, if they had it their way the streets you use today in your city would be toll roads, privatized and full of holes from the “cost effectiveness” = profiteering. And the owners of the roads would have billions of dollars and the people would be in financial trouble from paying for all those “Invisible hand of the market” services…
Disgusting little prop they did, especially when the bill is meant to protect those future generations from what the current and past generations have done to them.

Posted by: albalma | November 8, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Someone should bring in a little poor baby and say, “this baby needs health care right now, but because her parent’s come from a poor family that had to go into debt 60k each to obtain bachelors degrees so that they could work administrative jobs they were laid off from, she won’t be getting an H1N1 shot. Please wish her luck this winter. Her name is Sarah, and I really don’t know what she wants in terms of this health care bill because she’s too young to speak.”

Posted by: S.H. | November 9, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Sara, how does telling the truth indoctrinate hate ? Are you obtuse to the fact that with Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, young people will not only have to deal with massice debt, they will also cope with a healthcare system that will cause many to wait for doc appointments just like in the UK and canada. can any supporters of reform tell us how you can add 46 million to the rolls of the insured that will not pay market rates will make coverage drop in price ? Javalation, why did canadians have to sue their own gov’t to open private healthcare clinics ? It’s because it sucks, the supreme court agreed, now, less canadians will have to come to America for treatment. If it repubs that want to stay in power, they would vote to give away Trillions to the masses to buy votes like dems do. How long will the country survive by letting the ignorant masses steer the ship ?

Posted by: bob | November 9, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

I’m independent but can one of you Dems answer me this? What ever happened to “ASK NOT what your country can do for you BUT WHAT YOU CAN DO for your country?
I think the socialist democrats won’t be happy until we are a WELFARE NATION where everyone is jacked into the Matrix nourishing themselves on the teet of the US government.
The bigger the government the smaller our freedoms and liberty.
We need health care reform but it seems to me that this isn’t actually about health care reform anymore…it’s about “our side” winning…and, in that case, we the people lose.

Posted by: the Shrike | November 9, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I would rather see our tax dollars spent on helping the people within our borders. Why are the same people complaining on the trillion + that will be spen on a war we didn’t need. Oh that’s right we did it to make sure we would have access to cheap oil. That’ obviously working out well.

Posted by: poolez | November 9, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

fromca, you are a fool to think gov will play on a level playing field. First, they are putting rules in place that will hurt the private companies like forcing them to take on a sick insured. How long would Vegas stay in biz if they were forced to let gamblers see the card before the bet was placed. Can you buy a totalled car and force your auto insurance pay to fix it. Most importantly, not only do the feds not have to profit, they can lose money every year and force taxpers to pay for it. Ever hear of Amtrack, post office, medicare, medicaid, social security ? The gov plan also penalizes companies by forcing them to pay taxes into gov healthcare as well as forcing medical companies to pay billions into obama care. How long would Ford be in business if Ford had to cover GM’s losses every year. Pelosi is a liar, if not, can any of her defenders explain her lie of Obscene profits, you losers have no clue what heatlh insurance companies profit margins are. When Bush was in office it was obscene oil profits, about nine percent. Now it’s healthcare company profits she is lying about.

Posted by: bob | November 9, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Hm…a baby as a prop….point well taken. Its obvious that those in Congress who voted for this shame of a health care bill dont give a rats a** about future generations and the level of taxation that will be levied upon them…pathetic, heartless losers.

Posted by: angus | November 9, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Wait a second—The Democrats brought children in also and cried that they will die unless they get National Health Care, which is way more devious since the Democrats are millionaires and those kids will never have to pay for anything. So why does ABC News only mention the Republicans???

Posted by: Peter King | November 9, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

What a stupid ploy! The only thing the crazy communist Republicans are is a bunch of power-mongers. THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! (Just ask the 50 million Americans WITHOUT healthcare.)

Posted by: jmb | November 9, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

That REPUBLICAN is a LOSER!

Posted by: us citizen | November 9, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Why is it conservatives couldn’t care less that their grnadchildren will be paying for useless wars, yet don’t you dare try to spend a dollar that actually benefits common Americans?
I honestly believe most Americans can’t think for themselves any longer…..the lack of common sense and critical thinking is scary…..

Posted by: dk | November 10, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Could the American voter please remove their head from their partisan ### and vote all of these losers out of office? Please? Please? Please?

Posted by: dk | November 10, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am

“EXACTLY WHAT WE NEED!!!!! Another goverment program! Really, why should I think anymore. I don’t need to work, because I can just get unemployment. Don’t need to work because I’ll get healthcare from the goverment.”
Same old fallacious arguments… no body is asking for “free” healthcare ? People want a plan which really “covers” them, not one which betrays them when they really need it, using the term “pre-existing condition” .. If govt can provide one.. so be it.. who is stopping the private sector to provide a better one ?

Posted by: fromCA | November 10, 2009, 4:47 am 4:47 am

ObWan222, if a doctor drinks alcohol on call they should have their medical license taken away.
Medical boards do investigate cases and each quarter my state’s medical board review is full of doctors with substance abuse, quality of care, and other problems who are stripped of their licenses. You would have to look far and wide to find other groups who police their industry as rigorously as medical boards. Any patient can complain and it will be investigated. Here in North Carolina, many of the investigators are former State FBI investigators.
Every day I work I see many expensive tests performed as part of defensive medicine. Unfortunately, I frequently have to recommend them myself. All a trial lawyer has to show is that a “preponderance of the evidence” (NOT beyond a reasonable doubt”) shows that the doc “fell below the standard of care.” Well, guess what – 50% of the time a doc’s care is below the average. By definition – the average is 50%. So trial lawyers have a bonanza. Did you know that studies have shown that 75% of all breast cancers can in retrospect be identified on the prior year’s mammograms, in their subtle early form? Can you say, “Delayed diagnosis?” Then you have semi-retired docs happy to testify that the breast cancer should have been seen, for only $500/hour plus expenses for their expert testimony.
Here in my city we diagnose about 10 new breast cancers a week – that’s a potential new lawsuit every day of the week. That is the industry that we are trying to shine a light on. Trial lawyers gave nearly 10% of the amount of money that ALL INDUSTRIES in health care gave on all issue combined from 2003-2007 (source: maplight.org). They are in control of this issue. That is why the new House Health Care “reform” Bill denies federal monies to states that cap malpractice awards. The democrats are poisoning any attempt at real reform.

Posted by: SmallBiz | November 10, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Alec – you say you spent 8 years as a claims analyst for Blue Cross. So your job was to deny claims or study trends to try and save money for your company, right?
Now look at social security. Going broke. Medicare – about to cut payments 21% across the board. Everything running out of money.
Look at this country, in a terrible fiscal crisis, spending ourselves to oblivion with absolutely no restraint. Everyone talks about the financial “bubbles” that occur afterwards like we should have seen that one coming. Like giving home loans to people who can’t possibly pay them, and foisting the loan off on someone else. Well, how does that differ from the trillions in debt that this country is accruing? And expanding entitlements dramatically at the same time? This country is not sustainable. Not with spending like this.
If we have things to learn from Australia, please post them. But Aussies have a very different sense of health entitlement from Americans. Their health habits are different. For example, they have much less defensive medicine because lawsuits are rare. Unlike in America, where one in 1 physicians are sued each year. This leads to a frenzy of advanced, expensive tests that drive costs through the roof.

Posted by: SmallBiz | November 10, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Oops that number is 1 in 6

Posted by: SmallBiz | November 10, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

A biggest conservative orgument against universal health care good job on holding health care costs down so far.

Posted by: Health Care | November 11, 2009, 6:24 am 6:24 am

Shame on Rep. Shadegg for trying to pull a stunt like that. The child is barely out of the womb and she’s being used as a tool in one of the most grotesque displays of political and moral incompetence I’ve ever heard of in Congress (yes that includes the Bush years).
Kids, babies no less, should never have to think about “patient choice” and “mom’s premiums.

Posted by: Alex | November 18, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.