By Gorman Gorman

Nov 10, 2009 10:50am

Dede’s Revenge: ‘We’re Going to Work Against’ Palin and Others

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Just when you thought you wouldn't have to spell "Dede Scozzafava" anymore, the Republican nominee in that upstate New York special election is back — lashing out at Sarah Palin and others who worked against her bid.

In a revealing interview with The Washington Post, Scozzafava, a member of the New York State Assembly who lost her leadership post in the wake of her election loss, talks about what it's like to see her name turned into a verb (Gov. Charlie Crist, R-Fla., is the next candidate in danger of getting "Scozzafaved.")

She attacks Palin, R-Alaska, for endorsing the Conservative Party candidate, Doug Hoffman, even though Hoffman doesn't even live in New York's 23rd congressional district.

"How can Sarah Palin come out and endorse someone who can't answer some basic questions," Scozzafava tells the Post. "Do these people even know who they are endorsing?"

And Scozzafava has this message for the Club for Growth and other Republicans who are vowing to bring down moderates.

"There is a lot of us who consider ourselves Republicans, of the Party of Lincoln," she said. "If they don't want us with them, we're going to work against them."

User Comments

Yay, Dede! Finally, a moderate Republican grows a spine. I hope she disavows Rush Limbaugh next, then kicks Glenn Beck in the pants.
On second thought, that might save the Republican Party. Never mind.

Posted by: Amy in Maine | November 10, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

It’s really sad to see how uninformed many Americans are. Of course, they are not shy about showing their ignorance.
Dede can count on Palin’s cooperation. Palin is her own worst enemy. Let her alone and she will destroy herself and the Republican Party as well. A basic win/win situation for America.

Posted by: Doppelganger | November 10, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

OK, this woman is not a “moderate.” She is a far leftist moonbat who was even more leftist than the Democrat, Owens. Dede friggin’ ENDORSED the Democrat, and she wants to call herself a Republican?
Who is she going to recruit to help stop Palin? Palin is already hated by the establishment GOP and the Left. Palin’s conservatives supporters are still going to behind her, so it’s not like Dede is changing anyone’s mind here. This woman is a bitter old prune who’s mad that conservatives are rightfully retaking back the GOP from leftists who want to blur the lines and and keep advancing socialism.

Posted by: Brian | November 10, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

It’s a typical meme. Out of touch politician who still smells of smoke from the backroom filled with corrupt party insiders gets taken out by reformer and corruption fighter Sarah Palin. “Victim” joints the anti-Palin movement.
There will come a time when those who have not stood for integrity, principle and good governance will all be in one party and all those who are not will be in the other party. You will be able to tell them by the “I hate Palin” buttons they’ll be wearing.

Posted by: ReaganTMan | November 10, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Corrected Post:
It’s a typical meme. Out of touch politician who still smells of smoke from the backroom filled with corrupt party insiders gets taken out by reformer and corruption fighter Sarah Palin. “Victim” joins the anti-Palin movement.
There will come a time when those who stand for integrity, principle and good governance will all be in one party and all those who don’t will be in the other party. You will be able to tell them by the “I hate Palin” buttons they’ll be wearing.

Posted by: ReaganTMan | November 10, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

There are far more dangerous divisions within the Republican Party between fringe extremists and moderates than anything publicized among Democrats.
The GOP and the press play those up, but it’s the GOP that is crumbling from within. Just look at the ridiculously named “Tea Party Party” in my state of Florida.

Posted by: Matt | November 10, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

ReaganTMan
Sarah Palin stands for good government? Really? Where does resigning from your elected office because your job is too hard fall on the good government scale?

Posted by: gary | November 10, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

The issue is two fold. One you have the people who will say anything and do anything to be elected for their own personal gain (Dede pretending to be a Republican for example) and then there is the hatred for all “others”. Others being anyone who does not think like you or me. We need to understand the country must come first and not any indiviudal and it is best to have different points of view. I praise the abundance of ideas and detest the ignorant rants by all sides.

Posted by: Rich | November 10, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

“Do these people even know who they are endorsing?”
Ironically, a lot of people would say that about YOU Ms. Scozzafava.
Well I guess as a recovering lifelong “moderate” Democrat, there seems to be lot of US who will work tirelessly against ‘them”, the radical leftists who take their cues from a divisive, ultra radical marxist President, and whom YOU Mrs. Scozzafava directly worked for in the last election. Now you stand there proud of your bald-faced betrayal and making threats????

Posted by: fish story | November 10, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

For Dede and her supporters: You can support abortion rights and still be a Republican. You can support gay marriage and still be a Republican. However, when you support anything other than small, limited government and fiscal conservatism, you are no longer a Republican and should not run as one for political office. This is true of many Republicans these days and Dede is no exception.

Posted by: Dave | November 10, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Gary….Palin never resigned because the job was ‘to hard’, she resigned to ‘pursue’ other options.
While on the campaign trail she still conducted work for the state she was recieving pay from. Unlike Obama (that resigned from his State Senate position) that went on the campaign trail for 24 months, continued to draw a salary from his state, and was a ‘no show’ in his state’s responsibilities.
If you don’t like Palin then admit it, but don’t lie about her.

Posted by: david | November 10, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I’m not sure why the Republicans are so ticked off at Dede. She endorsed a candidate of another party for congress from her district. That is exactly what George Pataki, Sarah Palin, Tim Pawlenty and Rush Limbaugh did. The difference is she waited until there was no Republican candidate in the race to do it…

Posted by: Coloradem | November 10, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

When you’re sworn in for a four year term, you don’t have “other options”. You have a trust with your constituents to complete your term, you don’t quit halfway through because it’s too hard, or you realize you could be getting rich instead of solving the problems of your state.
If you think those are admirable qualities for a politician then by all means slap a Palin 2012 sticker on your bumper.

Posted by: gary | November 10, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Sorry Dede, the “Going Rogue” book title has already been taken. It’s funny that liberals refer to Owens’ 4-point victory as a NATIONAL referendum on big government health care now, but then when a liberal in Republican’s clothing is outraged that Sarah Palin took her down faster than she would an elk in Alaska, she is angered about Demographics?
To all RINOS out there, Palin has the time, the popularity, and resources…and has 100% backing of the conservative majority in this country.
Moreover; she left Governor to STOP the insane liberals in Alaska from filing anymore phony ethics complaints against her – 18 in one year costing Alaskans millions of dollars.
Well, their constant harrassment of Palin is now only backfiring on THEM. Because her power now and choices are limitless and everytime a liberal or feminist (or a not-very-attractive woman like Scozzafava) says something negative about her, I smile even wider.

Posted by: Steve | November 10, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Palin resigned because she and her staff had spent every waking moment fighting ludacris ethics complaints. Also, there were numerous others lined up by liberal groups determined to destory her. They were never going to end.
She felt that it was a terrible use of the taxpayer’s dollars to continue, so she stepped down. Imagine, a politician who actually says they are acting in the people’s best interest…and they really are! This woman became gov and fired the private chef and sold the private jet, she is NOT your typical politician.
Meanwhile, barry in chicago was making back alley deals with tony rezko to secure a 2 million dollar mansion for himself (rezko, obama’s former senate campaign organizer is now a convicted felon). BO is truly ‘change we can believe in’. America needs to wake up.

Posted by: Dave from KC | November 10, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Gary
I actually have a Palin 2012 bumper sticker. Do you really believe what the obamamedia is telling you?
Palin sold the private jet because she said it was too “over the top”, she fired the private chef because she said the service was “unneccessary”, and now sylists from her VP campaign have come forward saying they had to remove price tags on clothes before giving them to her because she complained they were “too expensive”.
Given all that, you think she suddenly became overwhelmed with greed? It doesn’t add up.
She could be the next Ronald Regan. Given the left’s hatred of her coupled with the media’s treatment of her the 2 appear to be more similar every day.
Hang on liberals, it’s about to get interesting.

Posted by: Dave from KC | November 10, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

What? John Clavis, methinks YOU are the empty head. Regan had more intelligence than your entire party contains!
Take your flame bait and try spreading it over someone that might believe it.
It’s really an interesting ploy that you have there. Take all the adjectives that apply to you and your ilk and try to make them stick on the opposition. Sounds a lot like Alinsky to me.
Keep spinning. It’s the only thing that will keep you warm next November.

Posted by: Medbob | November 10, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

A Palin candidacy would guarantee the reelection of Pres. Obama. You really think someone who couldn’t answer softball lob questions from a lightweight like Katie Couric, or for that matter out-debate a moron like Joe Biden, is qualified to run the country?

Posted by: gary | November 10, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

“a terrible use of the taxpayer’s dollars”
The taxpayers didn’t save anything when she resigned, since the lawyers and staff who were defending her are all still Alaska state employees.

Posted by: gary | November 10, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Bring it on DoDo.

Posted by: KansasGirl | November 10, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Gary
Did you actually watch the VP debate? All of the pundits on the liberal networks said it was a tie (which means Palin won). Palin was a 2 year gov and biden was a 35 year sitting senator. Pretty impressive if you ask me. Especially considering 70 MILLION people were watching expecting her to fail, and the next day it was revealed that biden had said 14 inaccurate things.
As for the couric interview when Palin stumbled when asked what she read, the media took that and ran with it.
But somehow the week earlier, when couric interviewed biden, the media forgot to cover it.
He was not only unaware of who was president when the 1929 stock market crashed, he was under the dilusional impression that “Roosevelt went on television to calm everyone down”. Riiiight.
Gary, you are just another casualy of the media’s willful agenda to crucify Palin and cover for obama.
Do you remember when barry said he had “been to all 57 states”? Of course you don’t, because the media ignored it.
Imagine if the hick from alaska had said that.

Posted by: Dave from KC | November 10, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Let’s see….
Dede Scozzafava vs. Sarah Palin… which one will be victorious????
Well this is a no-brainer. Scozzafava and Palin in a competition for the heart-and-soul of the Republican Party? Dede is not in the same realm as Sarah Palin as far as influence. Sarah may not be the next President, but she will surely be one of the most influential voices.
Who might Dede’s allies be in this endeavor? Dede has been thrown away, because she never ascribed to Republican values. She is just not important to the state party, much less a national influence.

Posted by: Debra | November 10, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

hey DeDe, check it out. As a conservative I can tell you ” bring it on”. You are a disgrace to the “Republican” party. You may as well just declare yourself a liberal democrat and get it over with because your no different than one of them. You are no more a threat to the conservative movement than any other liberal democrat with your socialistic ideals so get over yourself. You lost the backing of the Repubs because your a traitor to your parties beliefs. Now please, just go away quietly, your embarassing yourself even more. Stop being so vindictive you triffling liberal traitor.

Posted by: george | November 10, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Scuzz balls like Dede are RINOs pure and simple. She is a LIBERAL (just look at her voting record) not even a moderate. Good riddance!

Posted by: Hildegard Lee | November 10, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

“Did you actually watch the VP debate?”
I did. I especially liked the part where she winked at me.
C’mon Dave, if the media failed to cover Biden’s gaffes how did you manage to hear about them? Are you accessing some super secret news source unknown to the rest of America?

Posted by: gary | November 10, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Scozzafava tells the Post. “Do these people even know who they are endorsing?” —-
I think the appropriate answer is YES.. and even more important than that, they know who they ARE NOT supporting. They are not supporting a “so called republican” who supports Obama’s stimulus, his healthcare debacle, TARP, unfettered abortion rights, gay marriage, Cap and Tax, gun control, and tax increases..
A moderate is someone who falls on both sides of the fence on various issues.. not someone who is lock step with the far left on every issue but puts an R by their name anyway..
There is NOTHING moderate about Dede.. if she wants conservative support, then perhaps she should consider being conservative on a few issues.

Posted by: arkievet | November 10, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Gary
No, I am not accessing any super secret news sources, I just read up on my own other then the big headlines the following day.
For instance, MSNBC/CNN were obsessed with Palin’s winks, FOX was obsessed with Joe the Biden’s inaccurate statements. All 3 news organizations are very biased.
I just researched who was truthful and who wasn’t. That was a BIIIGGG win for Palin in the truth department. But people like you could not get past the winks, which is why we have a socialist who HATES America in power right now.

Posted by: Dave from KC | November 10, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

gary–”A Palin candidacy would guarantee the reelection of Pres. Obama.” —-
Here’s a news flash – unemployment is 10.2% and rising. “True” unemployment (U-6 figures) are at almost 20%. The stimulus has “already provided most of its intended affect” (quote from an actual WH report on the stimulus) and the WH has now stated that unemployment will in all probability exceed 11% and may not improve for 2 to 3 years. Obama has spent more in 10 months than Bush did in 8 years. Gitmo is still open, we are still in Iraq. For 2 months, Obama has failed to take action on the advice of the General HE appointed in Afganistan.. all while we have lost MORE US troops in Afganistan than at any other time during the conflict. Healthcare is being shoved down our throats even though a majority of American’s DO NOT support the current version of the bill. and now Dems are discussing Cap and Trade (also known as the biggest “job killer” in our history). Corruption is rampant in the Dem ranks, we have more “czars” appointed than cabinet members – actually more than all other presidents combined. A government that can’t get a swine flu vacine to the people on time – now want us to trust our healthcare to them. An administration who can not account for how 80% of the TARP money was spent now thinks we need another “stimulus package”…
Bozo the clown could run against Obama in 2012 and it would not guarantee his reelection.
I am old enough to remember Carter.. and well versed enough to know the results of other Democratic presidencies when they were allowed to pursue their agenda. Providing that the country is still in existance, 2010 and 2012 will mean the beginning of yet another 2 decades of republican majority… just as it has every other time the dems have tried to run the country.
Face it – their policies FAIL MISERABLY.

Posted by: arkievet | November 10, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

If the conservative “majority” in this country all adore and love Sarah Palin so much that she will inevitably sweep to victory, why did McCain lose the last election by a fairly clear margin?
Do you honestly think Barack Obama has some kind of Time Lord brain control ray? While he did benefit from heavy turnout from the black community, it isn’t like that was the decisive factor.
I think it is instead that a lot of people find Sarah Palin disturbing and don’t want her as a leader, and don’t agree with her articulated positions, but did agree with Obama’s. If you nominate her in 2012, expect to lose.

Posted by: T | November 10, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Arkievet,
It was a Republican president and a Republican Congress that created every problem you’re now trying to blame on Obama. Unsustainable spending and debt, opening Gitmo, getting us into Iraq and Afghanistan without an exit strategy, failing to do anything on health care, rampant corruption among Republican congressmen, a government that couldn’t get the bird flu vaccines out in time, an administration that can’t account for hundreds of billions in Iraq spending, etc., etc.

Posted by: gary | November 10, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I am so sick of people ripping on Sarah Pallin & usually INCORRECTLY.
Get the facts straight or shut up.
She is the best thing for the Conservative Republican party since Ronald Reagan. She is smart, attractive and has a huge following-sorry Dems, you don’t have anyone except a lot of followers of a President, who is out to destroy our country. Wake up America…..

Posted by: azmare1 | November 10, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

First not all Conservatives are 100% behind Palin-I am very conservative from a very red southern state & no one around here is all tingly over Palin. Use any spin you want she quit-period-doesn’t matter why, you don’t cut and run. My issue with Palin is I believe that in a national election she is unelectable as is Mitt Romney, Huckabee, Newt for sure, Rudy-all the also rans. I don’t know who the answer is-Bachmann is a possibility, Perry is a possible, & I have heard a dozen other names mentioned. Palin supporters tend to drive others away-when she initially was chosen I liked you, but her own actions sank her ship with me, then her obsessed supporters-pushed me the rest of the way. RINOS like Dede need to go, politicians & liberals can laugh or joke or ignore tea party conservatives all they want, but we took 2 Governors from them this time-not to mention a couple of other elections, 2010 is coming.

Posted by: Victoria_29 | November 10, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

So, when she was a Repub. who would have voted against health care reform, she was alright. Now that the Armey/Palinites are forming a third political party, she is dog meat.
It’s illogical to call a convert bad things when someone lowered the boom on them from inside their own party. You should oprn your eyes to the truth. Repubs have a big problem. The fringers and extremists are forming their own party. none of them would have voted Democrat. Aol would have voted Repub. So a weak base loses it’s core and a smaller lesser party gets self satisfaction. I say, oh, good. 2010 can not get here to soon.

Posted by: secreg756 | November 10, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Hoffman did not live in the district because they gerrymandered the line to put him out of the district, I understand. I honestly don’t know if that was done by the Rep’ or Dem’s.
As for party division, the Daily Kos is telling it’s readers to not give money to the DNCC as it may go to moderate Dem’s. MoveOn say it will actively work against moderate Dems who voted against the Health Bill. Sounds like a pretty serious division to me. A lot of money flows from these two. Sounds like a pretty small tent to me.
As for Sarah, she would have been a far better VP than Biden and Pres. than Obama. However, that is a very low bar. While I like and admire her, I don’t think she should be on the ticket in 2012. I do hope she works for the Party, though. i fear the media has done far too much damage to her. They always do when they really fear a Republican who they think can really connect with the folks.
I would like to see Jindal, or Pawlenty, perhaps. Or someone brand new. We will see.
I doubt that Owens will get reelected, by the way He campaigned against the Health Bill and then promptly voted for it. I think people are really getting tired of being lied to.

Posted by: Mac | November 10, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

hey dede…..you couldn’t even carry Palins high heel shoes…………you pathetic excuse of a woman………..

Posted by: danr2960 | November 10, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Democrat heads explode whenever Palin’s name is mentioned. Sarah Palin has integrity, something the dumocrats have little of …. Palin 2012

Posted by: James | November 10, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I love it how all these Palin lovers gloss over her humongous political deficiencies.wink wink.

Posted by: franktheliberal | November 10, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

gary,
When does “it’s all the fault of George Bush” end? Do you have a time when it is Obama’s fault?
Obama was for Afghanistan, for TARP and hasn’t figured out a better idea than Bush for Gitmo. He was against the surge, which worked, and he would have had a much worse problem now if Bush had done what he wanted i.e. no surge.
Obama voted against Mccain’s bill to regulate Freedie and Fannie in 05/06 leading to the credit default. Obama had plenty of opportunities to prevent what has happened. He was extremely shortsighted and wrong.
Just tell me when it is Obama’s fault, please. Ever? 9/11 was a gift to Bush from Clinton as was a recession. Not once did Bush blame anything on Clinton. He rolled up his sleeves and got to work. When will Obama?

Posted by: Mac | November 10, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Who are you going to believe–Palin or the people who actually live in Alaska? Palin’s popularity had dropped to 20%; the Lt. Governor was doing her job from the time that she first got McCain’s attention because she was so busy promoting herself; a poll was taken in Alaska and it was found that 80% of the voters felt she was corrupt and dishonest; Palin had so many ethics complaints because she was unethical–cheated on her taxes; lied about what she stood for and how she voted; took bribes and gifts; used Government money to build her house on the lake; fired anyone who disagreed with her. Some of you posters just refuse to check facts and just believe her lies. Palin quit because she was so unpopular in Alaska; did not want to do the job she promised to do; and she saw the chance to make more money. Thank heavens there are honest people who are not motivated by the almighty dollar.

Posted by: Sandra | November 10, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

The republicans embraced Scozzafava and rejected Hoffman. The republican party chose her as their candidate, funded her campaign with $900,000 and supported her until she quit. So why is she whining?

Posted by: tennessee | November 10, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

So blaming Clinton for Bush’s problems is OK, but it’s not OK to blame Obama’s problems on Bush, gotcha.
“Obama voted against Mccain’s bill to regulate Freedie and Fannie in 05/06″
This never happened. The bill died in committee (a committee that Obama was not a member of) and was never voted on by the entire Senate. Maybe you should be asking the Republicans, who had the Senate majority in 2005/06, why it was killed.

Posted by: gary | November 10, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Sandra,
Could you please source your charges? This is the first time I have heard almost all of them.

Posted by: Mac | November 10, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Nothing brings out the left wingnuts like the mention of Sarah Palin. And to think, she’s going to be on the national stage for at least a decade. I’m loving it.

Posted by: Janet | November 10, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Lets see DeDe made her own bed. Is she..was she a Republican or a Republican? I don’t see her values in line with a “True Republican or Conservative”.
Dede was found out, she was careless in her views, leopards spots do not change, her true colors started to show…what she really stood for once found out she was PO’D, she then withdrew, and went further and really proved herself by supporting a democrat. This person now has the audacity to blame her demise on someone else? DeDe I have some news for you…you’ve been Punked. It’s unfortunate we have to deal with a democrat.. the one you supported who has already broken campaign promises, but what goes around comes around, it’s temporary.

Posted by: A Dining Room Table | November 10, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Gry,
I stand corrected. You are right. It did not make t out of committee. However, the Democrats were 100% dead set against it.
This from Bloomberg,for the whole story. Below is an excerpt.
Back in 2005, Fannie and Freddie were, after years of dominating Washington, on the ropes. They were enmeshed in accounting scandals that led to turnover at the top. At one telling moment in late 2004, captured in an article by my American Enterprise Institute colleague Peter Wallison, the Securities and Exchange Comiission’s chief accountant told disgraced Fannie Mae chief Franklin Raines that Fannie’s position on the relevant accounting issue was not even “on the page” of allowable interpretations.
Then legislative momentum emerged for an attempt to create a “world-class regulator” that would oversee the pair more like banks, imposing strict requirements on their ability to take excessive risks. Politicians who previously had associated themselves proudly with the two accounting miscreants were less eager to be associated with them. The time was ripe.
Greenspan’s Warning
The clear gravity of the situation pushed the legislation forward. Some might say the current mess couldn’t be foreseen, yet in 2005 Alan Greenspan told Congress how urgent it was for it to act in the clearest possible terms: If Fannie and Freddie “continue to grow, continue to have the low capital that they have, continue to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios, which they need to do for interest rate risk aversion, they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic risk down the road,” he said. “We are placing the total financial system of the future at a substantial risk.”
What happened next was extraordinary. For the first time in history, a serious Fannie and Freddie reform bill was passed by the Senate Banking Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets.
Different World
If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market would likely have not existed.
But the bill didn’t become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn’t even get the Senate to vote on the matter.
That such a reckless political stand could have been taken by the Democrats was obscene even then. Wallison wrote at the time: “It is a classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit. The Democrats and the few Republicans who oppose portfolio limitations could not possibly do so if their constituents understood what they were doing.”

Posted by: Mac | November 10, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Sorry, above post should have read, gary.

Posted by: Mac | November 10, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Gary, before you put negative comments against Gov.Palin, please read the actual facts, it is just showing that your knowledge about political and social issues are outdated. I have been years living in Alaska, and when Sarah Palin became governor, she was able to got rid of corruption within her party. Perhaps, you are among those corrupt alaskans who were out of job and that is why you hate Palin. Palin resigned from work because of Libs senseless attacks in tring to discredit Palin. Tell you what, those extreme libs and corrupt GOP represent the minority of the american population and yet, it seems that they have the loudest mouth and have more rights and privileges. I wish God himself will personally take over the governance of the United States and the world so that all evils and corrupted people will be exterminated by natural death,and then there will be true peace and tranquility on earth.

Posted by: Ray06nd | November 10, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Scozzafava resigned her position as Minority Whip. Coincidence? Unlikely.

Posted by: MaxL | November 10, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

poor little “RINO” !! Its time to rid Republican party of all the “RINO’S” – Republican In Name Only

Posted by: Hoops10 | November 10, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

I think Deidre needs to be honest with herself and those who previously supported her. She backed out of the race and endorsed the Democrat in the race at the behest of Representative Israel and Senator Chuck Schumer. That is not the act of a loyal Republican. Dede needs to change her party, since she really has little in common with it. As for Sarah Palin resigning, she did so after ethics complaint after ethics complaint(virtually none of which went anywhere)had caused her to rack up half a million in legal bills. Alaska has a very low threshold for filing such complaints and does not reimburse the accused official for expenses incurred. She could do little about that debt burden while still governor, due to legal limits on earning outside income, so she had to leave. Ms. Palin had enemies in the Republican and Democratic Parties in Alaska who were more than happy to pile on.

Posted by: Walter | November 11, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

I am truly proud to be living in this country..I have been in some other countries helping people. They all wanted to know what America was like. They felt we were the riches people ever and would just about done anything
to come here..I have a respect for Obama, but that does not say I agree with every thing he does..Mrs Palin is smarter than people want to admit. Those people that stand for the people of this wonderful nation scare those who want to play the power game..I voted for once and will again…..

Posted by: Wilburn | November 11, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am

What’s Scozzafava going to do to “bring Palin down?” Sit on her?!? Otherwise, she certainly doesn’t have the POLITICAL weight to affect Palin. She can rent herself out to the already prostituted mainstream media, but they’re losing their influence, too, Dede. Good luck with your vendetta against your own freakin’ party, you RINO traitor!

Posted by: Charlie | November 11, 2009, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Hey Dede, get over it.
Look at Palin – beautiful, successful, accomplished, great family life, etc.
And what do you have to show for?

Posted by: Ethan | November 11, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

How juvenile of her.

Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | November 11, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

This woman is not a moderate, and never has been. She’s a liberal, straight up. She was so far to the left that the Daily Kos endorsed her. A vote for her is like replacing George Washington with Benedict Arnold. Once in power, she’ll betray her own party, every time. She’ll make Arlen Specter look conservative in contrast.

Posted by: DesScorp | November 11, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Revenge somehow has a way of coming back on you & biting you in the a–. It would be better to sit down & think about why the conservatives did not want to support you. In order for the Conservatives to get back in power they are going to have to loose some of these moderates who vote with the Liberals on really serious issues. It is sort of like when Collins & Snowe voted against their party on some really serious issues which ended up making things worse. This woman ended up backing a Democrat in the 23rd district & did you see the video of the SEIU labor guy hugging the Democrat. She has taking help from Acorn before so that tells you right there she is a liberal herself.

Posted by: egw | November 11, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

DeDe may want to consider herself a “Moderate” Republican; but her actions are way left of “Moderate”! Maybe she should go the way of Arlen Spector!! Granted, I think the Republican Party needs to get more centered than Right. The downfall of the Republican Party has been the FAR Right Wing of the Party dictating what is “right” and the Moderates and some of the “little left of moderate” folks not speaking up and making a case for more middle of the road thinking. The core of the Republican Party is independence FROM government! Less taxes,pride in ownership of American goods and services,the ability to make our own decisions without Big Government “guiding” us along the way. Let the businessman make and keep his money so that he can hire your neighbor that has no job, so that you will not have to pay higher taxes to support your unemployed neighbor through Medicaid and welfare! I could go on…

Posted by: Jeanette | November 11, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Republicans won’t be subverted by Democrats in Republican clothing.
People who are Anti Palin are simply fearful that her non beltway, level headed style of politics will upset their rigged system.
That’s why the media tried to make light of her before she could get a foothold. Only it didn’t work, and it won’t work.

Posted by: Dave Beal | November 11, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

This woman is not a Republican any more that the Democrat she backed in this race! I hope she does try to take on Sarah because she will lose big time against such a popular person as Sarah.

Posted by: bobfromacworth | November 12, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.