Ft. Hood: Gen. Casey Doesn’t Rule Out Terrorism
The Army’s top officer, General George Casey wouldn’t rule out the possibility that the mass killing at Ft. Hood was an act of terrorism. I asked General Casey about warning signs that could have been acted upon and if this was a premeditated act of terrorism or if this is a case of someone who just snapped. Casey said, “I think we need to be very careful here on speculations based on anecdotes like that.”
“We all want to know what happened and what motivated the suspect, but I think we need to be very, very careful here in these early days and let the investigation take its course,” Casey told me on ‘This Week.’
General Casey told me on This Week that he’s worried that diversity could become another victim of Thursday’s mass killing at Ft. Hood. The incident was not the first case of fratricide by a Muslim and when I asked how the military plans to deal with this potential problem in its ranks, Casey said, “Speculation could potentially heighten backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers and what happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy, but I believe it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here. It’s not just about Muslims, we have a very diverse army, we have very diverse society and that gives us all strength. But again we need to be very careful about that.”
Watch video HERE:
- George Stephanopoulos
Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
To me his allegiance to his fellow Muslims on the receiving end of our bombs outweighed his allegiance to America the country of his birth. It really is as simple as that. He most likely viewed our foreign interventions as terrorist acts themselves and could not take the fact that he was about to become part of that injustice. After all it was preemptive and many civilians have been killed. I am not condoning his actions but rather viewing them from his mind if that is possible. Time to stop our cruelty because it is creating more enemies than we can imagine, as it should. It is a good thing we have two oceans surrounding us but even that may not stop them in the future.
Posted by: Huh | November 8, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
General Casey,
Why do you come on TV in a fighting man’s uniform? How can anyone trust you when you obviously are a deceptive person? Put on your dress uniform and act your grade!
Posted by: Rodney Peters | November 8, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
ABC Roudtable never answers the hard questions for health care as follows:
1. When we are short of doctors now, how do you prevent rationing when we bring a flood of people to free health care? It takes ten years to bring a doctor on board!!! Why doesn’t the bill call for influencing doctors to come to the USA by offering them $$$$.
2. If 500 billion $$$$ is taken out of medicare over the next ten years, how do you cover the 30 million projected to retire??
Posted by: Ron Tanski | November 8, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Terrorism? Of COURSE IT IS/Was!! He wasn’t yelling, “Sale at the PX”! There has been no mention of authorities checking out his Mosque?Imam. The connection HAS to be THERE!
Posted by: kim | November 8, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
General Casey, They pay you the big bucks for this comment? Of COURSE it IS Terrorism! Any one can see this, any one! Everyone is so worried about being Politically Correct! Screw PC! If it walks like a duck…..Your’e smart, fill in the rest!
Posted by: Duh!?! | November 8, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Hasan, the sole suspect in the massacre of 13 fellow US soldiers in Texas, attended the controversial Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, Virginia, in 2001 at the same time as two of the September 11 terorists.
The preacher at the time was Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Yemeni scholar who was banned from addressing a meeting in London by video link in August because he is accused of supporting attacks on British troops and backing terrorist organizations.
Hasan’s eyes “lit up” when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki’s teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday’s horrific shooting spree.
wrOng
For America
Posted by: sharon | November 8, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
When I was in the military, I had different uniforms for different duties. Does the General think that talking to the American public on TV on a Sunday in a studio setting really needs him to wear his battle dress? Shows some lack of judgment. But then, isn’t lack of judgment why no one blew the whistle on the killer given all the signals he was sending?
Posted by: John | November 8, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
What is this? So far they have come up empty on finding any connection to this guy and other terrorist’s. Fanning the flames.
Posted by: secondlook | November 8, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Ron, this story is about Fort Hood, not health Care!
Posted by: Phil | November 8, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
This makes me SICK!. He killed alot of people and because he has a Muslim sounding last name now all the armchair patriots jump on it. I think what this is simply is a MURDERING nut case. NOTHING more… What is next someone here is going to say he is Osama’s long lost cousin. I think WE IN THIS COUNTRY are far too much jumping on the terrorism excuse to justify our actions. The man went nuts, and trajically killed alot of young men and women. Why are we not calling the Seattle killing, or the Camp Leujene murder terrorism…. This is sick.
Posted by: DonsSemora | November 8, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
The military needs to take mental illness seriously. This man was showing signs of mental illness when he impossed religious beliefs into his counseling sessions. A rational person of any religion would not have done that. Sending him to Fort Hood to ship out to Iran was stupidity or arrogance. Forcing the mentally unstable to stay in the military puts our nation at risk.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
The potential symbolism of this of this horror might give us pause. The stress on the military from the longest sustained combat operation in American history has been distilled into a single American who embodies the many faces of this nation and its “war on terror”. Let us be cautious in the lessons we take from this sadness. There is more harm that could unfold.
Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
The terrorist court the mentally unstable to do their dirty work. They use these vulnerable people who are very needy emotionally and manipulate them to carry out the terrorists cowardly agenda. All persons entering the military should be given the MMPI to screen out potential mentally unstable people. I think the killers superior officers should also be given this test.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
The general needs to retire and start a hobby writing poems about dandelions and butterflies.
Posted by: EPU | November 8, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
It is horrible that there are people in this country that just want to label all Muslims terrorists. This guy obviously was stressed over his coming deployment to a war he made clear he was against and our armed forces were still forcing him to go. Once he had moved to Fort Hood in August he had been religiously persecute by his fellow officers and he lost it. People need to open their eyes and look at the whole picture not just a nut job delusion that any Muslim acting out is terrorist.
Posted by: Heather | November 8, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Terrorism: The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
————-
Sounds like terrorism to me, the guy didn’t go off the deep end strictly for personal reasons but political ones. After all if he just wanted to avoid going to Afghanistan he could have just injured himself, problem solved, he wouldn’t have been sent. If it was against any person in particular he would have injured that person, he didn’t, it was random, it was violence against a US policy and the icons (soldiers) that represent that policy.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | November 8, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Donsemora:
The shooter cried Allahu Akbar as he slew his unarmed victims in cold blood. Sounds like the calling card of a terrorist to me.
Posted by: EPU | November 8, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Posted by: Heather | Nov 8, 2009 11:41:27 AM
We have a volunteer Army, no one was forcing him to do anything that he didn’t willfully sign up for and take an oath to do. Do you think a soldier gets to pick and choose who he will fight and who he won’t? His moral conflict was no greater than any other soldiers moral conflict and if their moral conflicts are so great that they can’t uphold their oath the army is not the place they go.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | November 8, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Does the army around a medic to carry that many rounds when on an army base. The question is always who supplied him the rounds s the question to the generals in Afghanistan is where doe sTaliban get its ammunition.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | November 8, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
I think he had this planned for quite some time. I would call it terriorism. When he called out his Allahu Akbar. Our country needs to rethink who is allowed in our country. He will rot in hell for what he has done, and he deserves everything he gets. He should have no mercy. God Bless our United States of America.
Posted by: pjo136 | November 8, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Elsewhere, Casey says that the Army will revisit the issue of mental health as it refers to the multiple deployments.
History proves that such statements are worthless. A review will be made, Fort Hood officer staff will be interviewed, press conferenes will be held and in the end what will change – NOTHING.
Posted by: Beto | November 8, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Hello. Lets stop being untruthful and tell the truth for once even though it hurts. It was Terroism period. Bottomline.
Posted by: Steve | November 8, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
So because he was a Muslim it was automatically terrorism? Wow people.
So how about the hundreds a times a year in this country that a white guy shoots up some public place, that’s not terrorism right?
Posted by: CommonSense | November 8, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Why is General Casey’s flag patch have the stars on the left side?
Posted by: Mark | November 8, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
In our eyes this is a possible associated act of homeland terrorism. In the eyes of Muslims around the world this clearly an act of Jihad which is rationalized by the Qur’an. Jihad takes on many forms, information or al-Taqiyya (deception), education, then violence. The goal is always to transform the “Kafir” or non-believer to Islam faith or non-believing dhimmi.
In many ways, Hasan did Jihad by the book. Also, this the reason why al-Qaeda broadcast a video before any attacks of inhumanity. A good Muslim will study the Qur’an and the Sira or the life of Mohammad. The life of Mohammad is where the problem lies for Islam and for all other religions and cultures. Use history as a witness with the lens of Islamic conquest.
Make no mistake the Islamic external struggle is of religious, political, financial and cultural conquest and no one has to look no farther than to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan-Taliban, Pakistan, and the rest of Islamic states.
For the West this our struggle too, but for freedom, tolerance of thought and respect for all human kind.
Today, in order for Islam to be accepted as creditably religion of world peace and not a cult of Mohammad, it would require all believers to put the Sira and Book of Medina away and only hold the Book of Mecca as the faith.
In addition, the believers of the Islamic faith must seek to transformed their faith from the chains of thought of the Iron Age to Age of Peace and tolerance of all life.
Only then will Islam have the creditability and place in the world as a religion of peace.
Posted by: threeriverscrossing | November 8, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Hmmm…
This looks like another case where the U.S. Army needs to re-evaluate the deployment policies.
Yes, when you join you become a G.I. – “government issue,” and for the most part, you must do what your superiors order you to do, without question.
However, we are on the brink of 2010, and in the midst of another unpopular military action. Many soldiers are not happy with their duty assignments.
In particular, if an officer – especially a medical officer – expresses any type of dissatisfaction with assigned duties, the Army can simply reassign the officer, to something like supply, laundry, or motor pool, until the enlistment or service period ends, or the processing of a discharge; whichever comes soonest.
Instead, there are “good ol’ boys” in the Army who believe in the dictum – “Ya’ll do as I say, ya hear?” Or, “You WILL do such and such,” etc. Whether their leadership is good or bad, they relish controlling others.
Most people who have a lick of sense would express some concern for their safety and the safety of others, by asking questions of superiors who might fall into the impaired reasoning category.
Just because someone is a sergeant or an officer, does not mean that individual knows the safest and best course of action.
As a veteran of four years of U.S. military service, I know that far too many sergeants, and some officers, get waaay tooo wrapped up with and carried away by their authority and control over others.
One does not need to serve in actual combat to develop PTSD, (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder). There are dozens of things that could cause stress or trauma to you and not to me, and vice versa.
Major Hasan could easily develop transference and PTSD or Depression, simply by listening about the traumatic and stressful experiences of his patients.
The split second that others heard Major Hasan expressing dissatisfaction with his duties, the Army should have reassigned him to different work, while, they arranged for his discharge. Problem solved.
However, someone in the Army, who more than likely still is receiving a paycheck, either shrugged off the possibility of trouble, or made the decision not to do anything.
Worse yet, according to published reports, the Army knew SIX MONTHS AGO, that Maj. Hasan was not a happy camper.
Now, because of the Army’s intractability, and goof ball “good ol’ boy thinking,” many people are dead and wounded, and, more than likely, the Army will end up having to arrange for an execution, all because of people with higher rank not using their heads.
This is a very sorry mess.
Locally, it was a similar situation with Lt. Watada at Fort Lewis, where higher rank dullard thinking ended up costing the Army a lot of money and embarrassment.
When Lt. Watada expressed dissatisfaction with his impending deployment, the Army should have reassigned him to a paperwork job, while discharging him. It would have saved the Army $$ and a ton of embarrassment.
Posted by: WhistleBerries | November 8, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Well said, threeriverscrossing.
Posted by: Heloise | November 8, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Diversity is tearing this country apart. To much of anything is bad. To much diversity is bad. Being tolerant of those who are different is one thing and valuing diversity is another – do not confuse the two concepts. The idea of forcing differing people into a group isn’t really such a good idea. While it is true that a diverse group can be more productive and accomplish more than a less diverse group it is also true that such a group brought together by force will be less productive as the elements of the group fight each other. I suspect this is what the general in battle dress is afraid to talk about.
Posted by: Robert | November 8, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
CommonSense:
Start living up to your name – nobody here is saying that because he was a muslim it equates to terrorism. Didn’t you read the story? He mass murdered his unarmed victims because of a grudge against the war and he cried Allahu Akbar as he slew his unarmed victims. Open your blind suicidally political correct excuse for eyes.
Posted by: EPU | November 8, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
So all those posting here saying that nothing this man indicates that he deserves being called a terrorist, the next time I know of a man who speaks out openly against the war, places internet posting calling suicide bombers ‘heroes’, and jumps on a table armed to the hilt crying Allahu Akbar as he begins pumping lead into people’s bodies, I’m supposed to say ‘everybody calm down this is not a terrorist act, he only wants to reach out’. You’re crazy.
Posted by: EPU | November 8, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I know for a fact the military is willing to take peole with mental problems as I have a nephew who fullfilled his military obligations in Veitnam and had fullblown schizophrenia. How could the military not know. They need to train all military how to recognize and report unstable people so they can get the help they need.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
My nephew thought the CIA was bugging his car and the electrical appliances in his home. He threatened to kill his father, brothers and his employer. This is called mental illness not terrorism. I know another schizophrenic that talked to religious pictures on the wall and he was Catholic. This is called mental illness not terrorism. He also tried to kill someone and that was his mother.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Those of you that seem to think that this is just a random act of mental defect are just stupid. This man is as close to a terrorist as Osama bin laden is. He was a devout Muslim ranting and raving about how evil America is, he wrote about his beliefs, he stated that suicide bombers are heroes and he planned and carried out this terrorist action. Again, if you can’t see the terrorist in this guy then you are truly without common sense.
Posted by: Bill | November 8, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Deploying the Muslim major was a good idea. As a psychiatrist, he was not being sent to “kill” fellow Muslims. He was being put into a position where he could bring peace between U.S. forces and the civilian population where he was to be deployed – at least that’s what it looks like on paper. No. I don’t think his murderous actions had anything to do with his loyalties to Muslims or the U.S. army. His motives were strictly personal. Not uncommon to obscure the motive with the method. In the strict sense of the word, it was terrorism but it was not a sponsored act of terrorism. In short, the guy was pushed over the edge.
Posted by: Robert | November 8, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Please STOP this nonsense, I wonder why people are referring to the guide`s faith as if this was the first time this kind of things happen, how many soldiers did kill their counterparts in Irak and Afghanistan and nobody mentioned the case as an act of terrorism? Then why today people are referring to this man`faith or let`s call a spade a spade: All muslims are terrrorsts, which I think your are pushing forward people to believe, it`s really very sad.
Posted by: the truth | November 8, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I agree with you “Huh”
Posted by: wavesofgrain9 | November 8, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
pjo136
I agree with you also.
Posted by: wavesofgrain9 | November 8, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Anyone dressing up in his religious garb and not as a soldier in preparation for a mass execution with two guns, not one, yelling his “God is Great”. could not possibly be deranged or “snapped” as the bleeding hearts would claim. This was premeditated and no doubt “programmed” in accordance with a certain “religious” conviction or delusion. To hell with us the “infidels”, now the fellow soldiers are praying for his soul. I don’t believe all this and thinking that I am only having a nightmare…or secretly I hope…what has happened to America?
Posted by: mike edwards | November 8, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I would like to ask a question of those of you that complain about about rightfully calling this a terrorist act, you want to say he is insane, not a terrorist. Let me ask you hypocrites if upon learning that Timothy McViegh was a caucasin American from a Christian background did YOU offer to dismiss him as insane? Or did you immediately label him a terrorist? The latter I think but since this man is a Muslim you want to praise and forgive him for killing American soldiers. Shameful, all of you.
Posted by: Bill | November 8, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I wonder how many Muslims in America today view this man as a hero instead of a terrorist or even insane. I would venture it is more than half the Muslim population in favor of his actions.
Posted by: Bill | November 8, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
As I recall, the bombing of the Federal Building was initially blamed on terrorists, until they learned they were found to be homegrown terrorists. Your claims of Timmothy McViegh being a Christian are a little confusing. Are you claiming he blew up the Federal Building as a Christian Act? I thought he was angry about somthing that happened in the military.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
The day of 911 the Muslim people I knew said they were ashamed that day to be a a Muslim. I found myself that day comforting them as they were also hurting and I told them not to be ashamed and they were not to blame for what happened that day, and that all nationalities have mentally ill people who do terrible things.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
This is the worst Islamic Terrorist act in US soil, and it was perpetrated in one of our own Military Facilities. They had already tried several times at Fort Dix and at Quantico, and did kill a recruiter at Little Rock, Arkansas. Obama and the media can spin it anyway they want it, it is not going to fly.
Posted by: wizcat123 | November 8, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Not a terrorist act? Then according to this logic 9/11 wasn’t terrorist act either.
What do the killers have to do: contact the omnipotent media the night before? wear a sign on their torso with blinking strobe lights saying “terrorist committing terrorist act” signed and dated by two witnesses?
What a country we live in.
Posted by: EPU | November 8, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
This whole matter could have been prevented had the military superiors not tried to force this man to pertray his conscience and causing him to crack under pressure. The military has a history of refusing to acknowledge mental illness in our service people. He was mentally pushed to the brink by the military and I don’t want this covered up with oh, it is just terrorism. I want the military investigated and I want the people that allowed this to happen held responsible.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
This had everything to do with Islam. Wake up guys!
Fort Hood Shooter: “maybe the Muslims could stand up and fight against the aggressor”~
Posted by: Christopher Logan | November 8, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
A NY Post article said he used a laser-aiming gun during this slaughter. What kind of man/soldier stoops so utterly low?
Posted by: linda duckworth | November 8, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
I believe he just flipped out, after listening to horror stories from soldiers coming back from there,,,and he knew he was about to have to endure those same horrors.I would imagine American soldiers who are Muslim, would be seen as bigger targets to Muslims in Afghanistan or Iraq.Why do we continue tow lie wars we cannot possibly win? There is NOTHING to win.We are just spending money we don’t have and leaving a growing number of dead soldiers who die
for “Others ” profit, NOT the defense of this country.It’s ALL about money,,enough to kill 3,000 Americans and cover it up while pointing the finger and waving the flag. Washington was responsible for 911, every bit of it.
Posted by: tincup56 | November 8, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
When someone puts their hand on the Bible and swears to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth and then proceeds to lie under oath, does that mean it is the fault of the Christians? Give me a break! If I were this man’s lawyer I would plead him mentally ill. I believe there is sufficient evidence to back it up. Let us stop blaming the Muslims and start taking responsibility for our own mistakes. To cover this up will only lead to this happening again. The military screwed up!
Posted by: greenthumx | November 8, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Tincup, the military may have screwed up but it does not alter the fact that this guy is a home grown MUSLIM terr.or.ist. Pure and simple that is what he is regardless of what his lawyer might plead.
Posted by: bill | November 8, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Janet Napolitano says not to jump to conclusions about this soldier being a Muslim, just as she says not to worry about illegals coming across the border, we see how that is going. This administration says “don’t worry” and in the meantime things are falling apart, unemployment is at 10.2% but don’t worry, it won’t exceed 8%. Yeh, don’t worry and don’t jump to conclusions.
Posted by: bill | November 8, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
I think President Bush made some unfortunate comments about the Palastine people and Islamics prior to 911. For what ever reason, I don’t know but I wish he hadn’t done that. Mistakes were made and I hope we have learned something from the mistakes.
Posted by: greenthumbx | November 8, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
yeh greenthumb, there you go, just blame Bush, or the Catholics, or the Mexicans or the Pope for this mans actions but don’t dare blame him or the Muslim terrorists that attacked America. It sounds like you want to give him a pass or a medalfor MURDERING 13 American soldiers.
Posted by: bill | November 8, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Oh and greenthumb, go ahead and blame Bush for the bombing of the USS Cole, the first World Trade Center Bombing, the Barracks in Saudi, and the embassy in Kenya, but wait he was not president then, but maybe he said something as governor of Texas that made this Muslim soldier turn murdering ter.rr.orist. Hmmm. Hey, blame Bush for WWII, he was not born when that started.
Posted by: bill | November 8, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
In my humble opinion, I think it definately was terrorism. Now the question is how many more? And how many others who are not in the military? And how many others who do not believe in such behavior, but will turn and change their minds? Are Americans “sitting ducks”?
Posted by: myopinion | November 8, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Of course it was a terrorist act !!. This guy killed 13 Americans and injured 30. What other damage did this creep do? I fear for the soldiers he “counseled”. Stop making excuses for Hasan.My condolences to the families and friends of the victims. My best wishes to the injured.
Posted by: CW | November 8, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
It was terrorism.
Posted by: CW | November 8, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
We need to ask the slain victims’ families and the wounded victims what they would call this attack on them. What is their opinion? And let’s include all the witnesses to the immediate tragedy that weren’t physically wounded also. What do they think?
Posted by: wavesofgrain9 | November 8, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
And after the facts that were released so far (before the media stifled the rest), I call it terrorism.
Posted by: wavesofgrain9 | November 8, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
“”"”"It was Major Hasan, though, who increasingly felt let down by the military, and deeply conflicted by his religion, said those who knew him through the mosque. Duane Reasoner Jr., an 18-year-old substitute teacher whose parents worked at Fort Hood, said Major Hassan was told he would be sent to Afghanistan on Nov. 28, and he did not like it.
“He said he should quit the Army,” Mr. Reasoner said. “In the Koran, you’re not supposed to have alliances with Jews or Christian or others, and if you are killed in the military fighting against Muslims, you will go to hell.”
“”"”"Danquah assumed the military’s chain of command knew about Hasan’s doubts, which had been known for more than a year to classmates at the Maryland graduate military medical program. His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan’s “anti-American propaganda,” but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal complaint.”"”"”
It seems he had been denigrating American policies, and nothing was done. Now family says he was teased….
Posted by: wavesofgrain9 | November 8, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
They said he had planned to get a lawyer to get him out of the Army. One word AWOL or 4 letters AWOL. Cheaper and quicker than a lawyer.
Posted by: d | November 8, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Definitions can be helpful :
Terrorism – act of violence directed intentionally against CIVILIANS with deadly force.
Act of war – act of violence directed intentionally agaist a military force by someone displaying affiliation to the opposing force.
Treason – act deemed to be in support of an enemy force by someone affiliated by citizenship or military service to a particular “side” in a conflict or war.
In this case we can refer to this as Treason but not Terrorism. If he was to display his offiliation to an opposing force we could call this an act of war (while still being by definition treason). This is not a terrorist act as it targeted military personel.
Posted by: Shane Anderson | November 8, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Being in the profession that he was in, he should have recognized the signs and sought medical treatment for himself. Some people feel they are above that. And his fellow colleagues should have seen the signs also. I have to disagree with those that say his religious beliefs had nothing to do with what he did. I do believe he was not able to handle what life handed him, but to have called out the words that he did when slaughtering these people definitely had something to do with his religion and beliefs. On more thing. To call him a suspect or that he allegedly shot these people irks me. They were there and saw him do it and he was shot (not soon enough)by the police officer that shot him. I guess, innocent until proven guilty.
Posted by: d | November 8, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Webster’s New World Dictionary: (1) Terrorism (noun), the use of force or threats. (2) Treason (noun), betrayal of one’s country to an enemy. Could you please tell me the dictionary that you found your definitons in?
Posted by: d | November 8, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
General Casey,
It’s sad that you consider diversity more important than the safety of US Soldiers. Just keep Anti-American muslims out of the US military, that would not break my heart, nor the people who employ you (the tax payer).
As for the shooter, how did someone so anti-American acquire the high rank of major ?? Maybe you should be an HR director, and not a general.
To enlist islamic militants for the sake of so-called “diversity” is very poor judgement. We need American warriors, not HR directors. I hope you are not indicative of the sentiment they hold in the pentagon.
Posted by: PSteel | November 8, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Definitions can be helpful :
Terrorism – act of violence directed intentionally against CIVILIANS with deadly force.
Posted by Shane Anderson 9:12 P.M.
******
From Dictionary.com – terrorism -
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
To think it can’t be a “terrorist” attack because they targeted a military base is very simply false.
I wish George would get some guts and ask REAL questions. Why did our President act as if this was an add on talking point on his Indian summit? It is very scary that we have a President that thinks NOTHING is more important than his agenda. Even American’s deaths.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | November 8, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
MSM is downplaying that this guy was a Muslim. Wonder where those orders came from. George, can you PLEASE DO YOUR JOB????
Posted by: wheresmymoney | November 8, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Hasan is a terrorist, through and through. He just waited for the right opportunity to inflict maximum casualties. He is convinced he is going to heaven for this act of multiple killings.
Posted by: mtnviewvj | November 8, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Sure Casey thinks Hasan is a terrorist, but Obama will be too busy giving him a shout-out to care…
Shoutout to Mike!
Posted by: Homie Relations Officer | November 9, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
He seemed like a normal guy who liked to go to the strip clubs with light beer in hand and party. So what happened on the way to Asia?
Posted by: crawford | November 9, 2009, 5:50 am 5:50 am
The Muslims happen to be taking over the rest of the world and no one seems to be paying attention to it. You have a man in Iran who thinks he’s a portal to the next coming of Allah but the fact is Allah cannot show up until the earth is cleansed and by that I mean, everyone that is not Muslim, must be eliminated. I would like most of you people or all of you to actually go out and get a copy of the Koran, and it will explain to you exactly what must be done for the next coming.
If you are Muslim you must do what this man did. Wake up America we have been infiltrated by our enemies.
Posted by: canibeheard | November 9, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Casey said”
“What happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy, but I believe it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here.”
To hell with diversity. We don’t need muslims in the American Military.
Posted by: Billw3 | November 9, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
“It is horrible that there are people in this country that just want to label all Muslims terrorists. This guy obviously was stressed over his coming deployment to a war he made clear he was against and our armed forces were still forcing him to go. Once he had moved to Fort Hood in August he had been religiously persecute by his fellow officers and he lost it. People need to open their eyes and look at the whole picture not just a nut job delusion that any Muslim acting out is terrorist.”- heather
When someone joins the military there is always a chance that they may have to be deployed to a combat zone. If you don’t want to take the chance DON’T SIGN THE DOTTED LINE!!!!!
Posted by: MJ | November 9, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Hasan was a recent and frequent visitor at the local strip joint, enjoying lap dances and being known as a “good tipper”.
One dancer recounted that Hasan bought lap dances from her in a private room on Oct. 29 and Oct. 30 (…)
This is from a Euro article.( ) Did U.S. media hide this fact?( )
If you google “”911 hijacker strip joint”", you wil see that is EXACTLY the behavior the 911 attackers exhibited in the recent months before the terrorist attack on our country.
Posted by: wavesofgrain9 | November 9, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Mark: All US flags on military sleeves face that direction…it is a symbol of them running into battle…if they were running with an actual flag on a pole, which way would it be flying? It would look as it flew just like the one on his shoulder. Take notice of all military uniforms…that’s the way it is.
Posted by: tat | November 9, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Major Hasan “worked” on the Obama Transition Team…”WHY HAS THE MEDIA IGNORED THIS FACT?” Major Hasan, the shooter worked for OBama!!!
Posted by: Peter King | November 9, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
If anyone here, including bigotedly asking George S., has ANY proof there is ANY Islamic extremism involved in this tragedy, then they should contact the Fort Hood investigators. Posting hate messages here is the ultimate evidence you either are a hate monger, an ignorant person, or not patriotic enough to help the investigators.
You choose.
Posted by: mamf | November 9, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Can you imagine if this soldier was a white male who yelled “long live the Confederacy” during the attack? We sure wouldn’t have to look so hard for the media coverage about his background.
Posted by: Indiana Dave | November 9, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
WHY are authorities hiding the OBVIOUS??? I feel like I am in a madhouse–Hasan had a long history of Jihad ideology, his act was planned carefully. He gave away his belongings the same day and copies of the Koran, obviously expecting to die as an Islamic “martyr.” He even shouted the Islamic death cheer “Allahu Akbar” as he was busy pulling the trigger that slaughtered those around him. But NO!!! We must find a motive. Could it be Islamic Terror?? Gee…maybe….how will we know…this whole CHARADE is totally psychotic. Perhaps the perpetrators of 9/11 (many of them quite bright) were just “stressed out.” Obama WILL NOT call it Terrorism–he prefers being soft on Islam by labeling it “an act of violence.” DUH–if America and the rest of the world DO NOT HOLD ISLAM ACCOUNTABLE, there will be NO CHANGE. Are you listening, Obama?? Islamic terror now rages in some 15+ nations around the world, with absolutely horrific and barbaric acts committed virtually everyday. Hasan fulfilled his Koranic mandate…but the politically correct will sweep it under the rug, give it another name other than…….Islamic Terror, a term that is almost a redundancy in today’s world.
Posted by: marat | November 9, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
This was a terrorist attack … Why is the media downplaying this ??
Posted by: CW | November 9, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
I believe the only one trying to rule out terrorism is the Wimp in Chief.
Posted by: TxBoB | November 10, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am
When you report false stories like one man at Fort Hood acting alone shooting two handguns at the same time using 100 bullets as reported, it seems that reporters would feel immoral or guilty while facing the camera talking. You people up North need to go to a shooting range and shoot two semi-automatic guns at the same time while walking. Then reload them after you use the biggest clip available for that type of handgun bought from the gun store. Start shooting again while aiming at moving and stationary targets try to get away while you are reloading the guns. To the reporters that are not already in the Abyss, “Man looks into the Abyss and there’s nothing staring back at him. At that moment, man finds his character, and that’s what keeps him out of the Abyss.” – Wall Street (1987)
Stop reporting lies to America, check your facts, then double check. After that, use some logic and gut feelings. I am not a reporter and I know more than most of you. “Mike and the Mechanics “Word of Mouth”
Posted by: imabeliever | November 10, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
With the additional information coming out – terrorism and he is a traitor.
For “Common Sense” this has nothing to do with being a muslim – terrorism can be by any sect who teaches killing is okay – when you are a non-believer.
When any person – who goes into our military and puts his/her religious or political beliefs – as higher oath than their oath to America – pick any name you want – when they kill our servicemen.
My answer “traitor” and should be put to death with a firing squad.
Posted by: Ted C | November 10, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I’d like to ask comment writers Huh, Heather and CommonSense, whose common theme is anger at Americans rather than the obvious terrorist Hasan, do you think you could express equivalent sentiments about the home country in the Islamic world?
Posted by: Michael | November 10, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Battle Dress uniform on at least two separate Sunday morning national news programs?!?
I can only imagine the Pentagon focus group that was paneled on what Casey should wear. Sad.
Casey is a politician not a solder. I found his wearing Battle Dress for this forum to be disrespectful to the American public, the members of the Armed Forces, and to elected politicians.
Posted by: Brix | November 10, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
The reason he lame stream media won’t call it terrorism is it might make 0bama look bad. And they got a alot of PR invested in him…..
Also it looks like they knew about him but did nothing to stop him…..Another blunder by the liar and chief…It seems like these blunders happen almost everyday now…..
Posted by: dean | November 10, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
pjo136 said, “Our country needs to rethink who is allowed in our country.”
OK, well then I vote that you should be the first one to go. In fact, all right wing extremist ‘conservatives’ should be barred from this great country. You all over react in your knee-jerk way to this event, when in fact this is the FOURTH time a soldier at Fort Hood has gone on a shooting rampage this decade. The other three soldiers were not Muslims.
Posted by: Think | November 11, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Stars are on the left side because they are always closest to the heart.
Posted by: K | November 11, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
I’ve been reading all these blogs, and many American’s need to review their constitution and dictionary for the following terms.
1. Free speech
2. What’s the difference between terrorism and a criminal act
3. Constitutional Right to Bear Arms (including the victims)
I’m very confused how we can blame the Government for not preventing the act? If Hassan wanted out of the Army all he had to do was say the word. He was an officer, not enlisted. His service was linked to the free college education he recieved.
I’m upset at the the Press not checking their facts. Assuming this guy was suffering from PTSD with the P meaning Post, as in after you expreienced tramatic stress. He never deployeed, and he worked in a hospital as a couselor. I’m sure his college classes were much more stessfull than anything he ever experienced at work.
Posted by: Brice | November 11, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I share my favorite idiot quote of the week…
“This latest tragedy, at a heavily fortified army base, ought to convince more Americans to reject the argument that the solution to gun violence is to arm more people with more guns in more places,” the Brady Organization’s president, Paul Helmke, said.
Let’s break this down. “Heavily Fortified Base?” Have you been to Fort Hood? It’s not a prison or a castle. Most of Fort Hood is bordered with a wire perimeter fence that can easily be cut or climbed, and is never fully patrolled. After that only about 20 armed Military Police Officers are on duty. I assure all reading this; nobody on Fort Hood feels safe. Thanks to Bill Clinton, nobody can carry concealed weapons on a military base even if they have a license from the State they are in, and open carry is not allowed unless to or from a shooting range, and the bullets have to be locked in a separate container in a separate compartment of the vehicle. Guns can be kept in your on post quarters, but not in your barracks room if you’re single. They have to go in the arms room, and you have to get permission to get them out, and then you must wait for the Unit Armorer to open up the vault and issue you your gun.
Down range in a combat zone, everyone on base has a weapon and at least one magazine at the ready. They sleep with their gun and eat with their gun. The bases are surrounded with 10 foot high concrete barriers, guard towers every 50 meters, automatic weapons at the gates. Vehicles are searched thoroughly, and sometime take up to 10 minutes to get through. Stores don’t sell uniforms so Iraqi’s can’t buy them and pretend to be US Soldiers. Now that’s fortified, and everyone inside is armed. When an attack breaks out on the base, people don’t flee from the fight; they rush into it and suppress the danger.
Posted by: Brice | November 11, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Yes, a loss of diversity is a greater tragedy than a dozen people gunned down.
But an even worse tragedy? Having a zit when you’ve got a date… I mean that’s just awful. Oh, and the sniffles. And when your food is served to you cold.
Well, these might not be worse; but like General Casey I can’t actually differentiate between things.
Shoot me in the gut, or look at me funny; I’ll probably react the same because I can’t tell which is worse.
But I am smart enough to be a general it seems, so I’ve got that going for me… that’s nice.
Posted by: Gekkobear | November 11, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
“…what happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy, but I believe it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here” Seriously??? This guy should resign, clearly another high ranking idiot.
Posted by: Laura | November 11, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Did you see awards shows in 2008 when people talked about the U.S. troops? Most of the people in the audience would stand. This year, 2009, after the Fort Hood hoax was announced by the Department of Defense to the American citizens, most people did not stand at the awards like usual. I don’t think the awards audience appreciated being lied to this year.
Posted by: mollmaguire13 | November 12, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
I will admit I only read two pages of comments but I cannot believe howNONE of the ones I read even have a clue what they should be concerned about in this case. The Intelligence agency (CIA) knew of contacts this indiveivual made to the cleric overseas and never even shared that information with the man’s employer. Even within the agencies that are supposed to protect us there is turf wars and divisiveness. Until society (voters) learn how to focus on the important part of an issue (i.e. lack of communication and cooperation between our own agencies) instead of reacting emotionally to these “red herring topics” (i.e. “is this a terrorist act?) we will never make any bona fide progress towards our own safety. LOL! We mistakenly think we can change other countries cultures (Iraq, Afghanistan etc.) and we aren’t even capable of correcting our own.
Posted by: CND FOX | November 12, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
DUH! Domestic terrorism is one and the same as terrorism. He was and is a home grown terrorist. Like most domestic terrorists, he had a background in the military.I put him in the same category as Timothy McVey, only McVey was a skin head/Nazi, and based his hate in Christianity.Hasan has no direct connection with Al Qaeda, other than his views. Though Al Qaeda would gladly take the credit and praise him for his deed. What difference does it make to label him? What will that prove at this point? And frankly all the speculation and the constant media coverage just adds to the terrorists’ glory and empowers them even more. There are over 3 billion Muslims in the world and about 1% of them are extremists. Don’t ridicule a whole religion because of a few killers and extremists.
Posted by: Bea | November 12, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
It seems that Gen. Casey has an ostrich mentality and will accept the “terrorism” scenario only as a last resort. There are radical Muslims in this country plotting against us, while many of our highest public officials studiously look the other way. America will pay dearly for this naive belief system.
Posted by: Andrew Zaplatysky | November 12, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Major Nidal Hassan is a psychiatrist whose main prescription is counseling, not full course medicines. An excellent psychiatrist will listen to any patient to get the proper mental torments of the patient in order to treat him by counseling. Such psychiatrist will not be shaken by the horrible incidents he is about to listen to. His profession does not allow him to be moved by such things. If it so, he is not fit for that profession. In that context, if Nadal’s such failure was earlier notified to the concerned, he should have not been allowed to continue his duty. The man who is susceptible to religious fanaticism has already offered his brain for brain washing by fanatics. His profession seems to be a mask here.
All peace loving people unequivocally urge terrorism is the greatest menace of our time. And the brains and hands that work behind terror attacks belong to those who have no claim to call themselves human beings. Those who bring death to innocent people could not have had human emotions. So it is wrong to argue that there is good terrorism and bad terrorism. The subject of terrorism should not get any such lame excuses. As we can see, those actions have not defeated terrorism. Instead, they have bred and encouraged more terrorism.
Posted by: Prem Nizar Hameed | November 13, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
“Ft. Hood: Gen. Casey Doesn’t Rule Out Terrorism”
GEE, YOU THINK??!!
Posted by: M. Smith | November 13, 2009, 7:53 am 7:53 am
I think Heneral Casey is doing a fine job. I remember him when i was with the 1st cav in 1975 .He is to the point and serves as a commander far better than anyone General I know. He has my respect and gratitude for the service he has and is doing. If i could serve my country again , I would be honored to serve under General Casey.
Posted by: paul | November 13, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am
So–some think this guy is nuts, then if that is so, all adhereing to the his type of religion must be mentally ill. It was his religion—and the thoughts embedded in his mind from his religion that caused this terrorist act. There was a time, in the military, if one spoke out and did the things that this
terrorist did, you would have been OUT, WITH A DD and it wouldn’t have taken years for it. Of course there was no
political correctness in the old military. What in H— ails this military, and y not get back to investigation of someone who obviously
hated this country. I was in the Air Force, and when I was ordered to a small
base, I had to fill out papers, from the FBI, and they did go to my home town, questioned everyone I knew. In those days, one couldn’t have relatives in Europe. Oh, and my parents and Grandparents were also scrutinized. However, I did get a top secret clearance. Also, I was in communication, and when I got to this
tiny base, was told I wasn’t suppose to be there, however, the AP’s did some checking, and found out I was in the right place. I soon found out, no civilians were allowed on base, military only–even saluted when not in uniform. No one but no one got past the AP’s (Air Police). It was so tight that when food was delivered-the Air Force trucks would go out and have it transferred into AF trucks, back thru the gate etc. Well, needless to say we all took it in stride. However I didn’t like working underground, and being searched in and out. It was 100% tight.
Now have a good day.
Posted by: profficer | November 17, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am