Gibbs on Capitol Hill Protest: “I’m Sure There’s a Jon Voight Joke in Here Somewhere”
Asked about the several thousand protestors who gathered on Capitol Hill today to protest Democratic health care reform legislation, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs joked about one of the actors who was a featured speaker at the rally, saying, “I'm sure there's a Jon Voight joke in here somewhere, given he was one of the featured speakers, but…my father always told me my mouth would get me in trouble, and I have a feeling if I acted on the line that I'd like to give you, I'm almost positive that it would.”
Voight spoke at the rally, decrying the White House’s "radical Chicago tactics,” as did John Ratzenberger, better known as Cliff Clavin from the TV show Cheers.
Many members of Congress, including Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn., were featured as well, as was conservative talk radio host Mark Levin.
Pressed further for a response to the rally, Gibbs said that “anybody that watches (the rally) is struck by the fact that there's a rally going on without a solution on their side.”
Referring to the House Republican health care reform bill introduced this week, Gibbs said, “they've rolled out a piece of legislation — and I use those — I hesitate to even say that. It's — it's a series of old ideas that — that wouldn't cut the amount of money government spends on health care nearly to the degree that other bills would. It fails to provide the necessary insurance protections that families and businesses need to assure them that, if they get sick, their coverage isn't going to be dropped or they — they and their family won't be discriminated against because of pre-existing condition. And it fails to cover virtually anybody in the country that already doesn't have insurance.”
Gibbs said “many in the Republican Party have wanted to be active in this debate, and the piece of legislation they've come up with, I think, is disappointing as a process in this debate and disappointing for millions of Americans that wanted help in finding affordable health care.”
A reporter asked Gibbs if it’s legitimate for protestors just to demonstrate even without a solution to say they don't like the approach the administration and the Democrats are pursuing.
“Absolutely,” Gibbs said. “But this is a representative democracy. I assume they came to Washington to try to solve problems like small businesses that are dropping health care coverage because it's not affordable. So demonstrating is fine. It's well within your constitutionally protected rights in this representative democracy. I would also mention that, if you were a representative in that democracy, it might also be good to have a solution that addresses some of those problems.”
Gibbs later clarified for a reporter that he was not referring to Voight’s performance in Deliverance.
-jpt

Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
===Gibbs later clarified for a reporter that he was not referring to Voight’s performance in Deliverance.===
So, what line was he thinking of?
Posted by: Axey | November 5, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Protest? What protest?
Bow? Obama didn’t bow.
I’m surprised Gibbs even admitted there was a protest.
Posted by: Kyle | November 5, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Isn’t the White Houses dismissive response, disconnect with americans and attack style exactly what Obama campaigned against?
Posted by: Oscar | November 5, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
The immaturity coming from this WH is disturbing. And, the media plays right along with it.
Posted by: jennifert7 | November 5, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
A great poster at the rally today:
“We are only 12 months away from fundamentally changing Congress”
Kudos to Michelle Bachman for rallying thousands on short notice to protest government takeover of health care.
Palin/Bachman 2012
Posted by: bailey | November 5, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Do we really want to let the government run our health care?
Taxpayers paid $24K per car in Cash/Clunkers.
The gov’t was 93 million doses short with H1N1 vaccines.
They screwed up a flu program!
Posted by: millie | November 5, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
“Gibbs later clarified for a reporter that he was not referring to Voight’s performance in Deliverance.”
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Ryan C | November 5, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Of course it’s legitimate for protesters to protest — we HAVE a solution. That would be to leave the system in place.
This “solution” is a disaster with trillion dollar costs that Dems are hiding. My solution? Scrap it and start over.
Posted by: beth | November 5, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Lets see if the Gibblet is laughing in 2010……….
Posted by: mickey maoist | November 5, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
GIBBS….THEY HAVE A SOLUTION.
First get rid of the idiot in the White House and YOU.
Second, get rid of the Congressmen and Congresswomen that cannot reduce the size of Government and spending NOW.
Third, install competent Leaders that want to protect America and its taxpaying citizens as well as its poor and low income, unskilled citizens.
Fourth, secure the borders to reduce the social costs of taking care of illegal immigrants.
Fifth, reduce the power of the labor unions and their drag on US businesses and job creation.
Sixth,Turn the economy around FIRST before attempting any NEW social programs.
Seventh, cap legal medical malpractice claims (tort reform)
Eight, if Medicare and Medicaid have ANY COST REDUCTIONS AVAILABLE TO FUND ANYTHING ELSE…FIRST, MAKE THOSE REDUCTIONS AND USE THE SAVINGS TO PAY DOWN DEBT.
ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO HEAR ABOUT, ROBERT????
Posted by: RUFUS LEVIN | November 5, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Pass it Dems and watch your seats fly away in 2010. The majority of Americans are against this legislation. The Dems won’t listen and yet they accuse the GOP of just saying no! Well, in this case, more Americans have sided with the GOP, unless poll numbers lie.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Gibbs is the most unentionally hilarious press secretary in history.
The abc V series about Obama is exactly on the money when it comes to media strategy.
Keep the funny stuff rolling Jake.
Posted by: Stop Already | November 5, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
RUFUS LEVIN —- Great post.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
The dems know they are done just by what happened on Tuesday…..that’s why it SO important to get this passed, of course when the repubs take over in 2012 they will stop it. Nothing is unusual here—dems mess it up, pubs clean it up………it’s a no brainer
Posted by: lyineyes1956 | November 5, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Pass it Dems and watch your seats fly away in 2010. The majority of Americans are against this legislation.”
Hat tip to Numeros for the compilation
“Favor/Oppose Public Option
48%/42% NBC/WSJ Oct. 22-25
61%/38% CNN/Opinion Research* Oct. 16-18
57%/40% ABC News/WaPo Oct. 15-18
62%/31% CBS News Oct. 5-8
50%/46% USA Today/Gallup Oct. 16-19
53%/42% Ipsos/McClatchy* Oct. 1-5
57%/39% Kaiser Family Foundation Oct. 8-15
61%/34% Quinnipiac Sept. 29-Oct. 5
55%/38% Pew Sept. 30-Oct. 4
46%/37% Rasmussen** Oct. 2-3″
Posted by: Ryan C | November 5, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Ryan C —– Nice try Ryan. I said this legislation not the public option, that is 2 entirely different things and you know it. Where’s your numbers on THIS legislation?
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 42% now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That’s down from 45% a week ago but unchanged from two weeks ago.
Fifty-four percent (54%) now oppose the legislative effort, up three points since last week.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
USA Today says “Six in 10 say Obama’s proposal, if enacted, would not achieve his goals of expanding coverage to nearly all Americans without raising taxes on the middle class or lowering the quality of health care. For the first time, a majority disapprove of the way he’s handling health care policy.”
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Thirty-five percent (35%) of American voters say passage of the bill currently working its way through Congress would be better than not passing any health care reform legislation this year. However, a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that most voters (54%) say no health care reform passed by Congress this year would be the better option.
This does not mean that most voters are opposed to health care reform. But it does highlight the level of concern about the specific proposals that Congressional Democrats have approved in a series of Committees.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
“Nice try Ryan. I said this legislation not the public option, that is 2 entirely different things and you know it.”
The public option is the main piece of legislation right wingers are screaming about.
And the American public wants the public option.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 5, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Well, in this case, more Americans have sided with the GOP, unless poll numbers lie.
lfrichar | Nov 5, 2009 2:59:53 PM
Poll numbers rarely lie. It’s usually the people who deliberately misstate the questions and inferences from them who are the liars.
Posted by: jhw539 | November 5, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Ryan C —– What part of the examples I gave you did you not understand? I can’t be anymore clearer. I know, it doesn’t fit into your scheme of things and it gives the appearance the majority want this legislation, but you can’t deny the facts and they are right there in front of you. I can get more if you would like.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
jhw539 — OK, I will play. Here is what I said and Ryan denied it: “The majority of Americans are against this legislation.”‘
Can I be any clearer?
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Ryan,
REALLY? The American people know the government is incapable of doing anything, and if you and the other liberals had any sense of reality you would see that. You and the other flat earthers are too busy pushing that “climate change” line of crap and all the other anti free market propaganda
Posted by: Scott | November 5, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
“”"”"confused by the various bills being prepared, and are generally distrustful of politicians – and who can blame them after the last 8 years.”"”"
Posted by: tierra
And the past 9 months! Pelosi has been around a while and there were 5 different bills being floated around. Then the were 3, Reid, Baucus and Pelosi. There are still 3 but Pelosi got these AARP and AMA idiots to sign on which only makes it seem even less credible. No big deal, a seat shake up in 2010 will be good for us.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Maybe the people that the Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey couldn’t but should have found don’t have a phone. No jobs and No health care – certainly points out the great work the republican party can do.
Their only contribution to the work force is the army jobs. Good health coverage but at a horrible cost to our friends and neighbors
Posted by: Tony B | November 5, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
It would b inersting to know how many protestors in DC today work for Insurance companies or other firms that might benefit by maintaining the status quo.
Posted by: Tony B | November 5, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Tony B —- Het Tony, the Dems have quite the majority right now and have you seen anything worth a crud pass yet? How long will it take for you to come to your senses? They haven’t done anything with their super majority they’ve embraced. Oh, I stand corrected. They passed the new law so they could replace Kennedy to keep their majority. Wow, if it is for them, they are quite fast aren’t they? Are you catching on to it yet?
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Tony B — Have you read the GOP bill? Have you read Ton Coburns bill? Or, are you doing exactly as many and taking everything Pelosi is saying as the truth? Do you really believe they can come up with 5 different bills and 4 of them somehow come under Obama’s requirement, but now they are looking to pass the most expensive? Keep drinking!
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Tony B —- Incentives, positive reinforcement. Penalties, negative reinforcement.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“The American people know the government is incapable of doing anything,”
And yet you right wingers are desperate to be in charge of it.
“You and the other flat earthers are too busy pushing that “climate change” line of crap and all the other anti free market propaganda”
10 of the hottest years on record since 1997
The luddites on the right wing would prefer to protect polluters and not look to invest in new technology.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 5, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
“The majority of Americans are against this legislation.”‘
______________________________________
I don’t think so. I think the majority of Americans still don’t really know what’s in ‘this’ legislation, are really tired of the misinformation and bickering – and would like to see what the final outcome really is – and they do support a public option, no doubt about that.
Posted by: tierra | November 5, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Hey, how great can the mean old Republicans plan be?
It only costs like, what 60 some billion?
We gonna Rahm through the mother of all spending bills for over 1.25 trillion dollars (then we have to add back 250 Billion we are hiding) and really give America what it deserves!
That the Republicans are willing to spend such a paltry amount says a lot about how spiteful they are.
Plus the Republicans want to limit lawsuits and bring tort reform. Don’t forget that trial lawyers need jobs too America.
And the V healthcare plan is nothing like our plan either.
And Anita Dunn is not a lizard!
Posted by: Axe | November 5, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I wonder how long they can treat the opposition (and really almost anyone who doesn’t fall in line with them) with utter contempt before it starts to hurt them. This recent election may be a clue as to how that is going to work out for them in the future.
Posted by: Chiara | November 5, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Great article Mr. Tapper…finally a journalist who deserves the title!!
Posted by: ross | November 5, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“”"”10 of the hottest years on record since 1997″”"”"
Posted by: Ryan C
I get a kick out of this. Yes, they are, but we are cooling not warming from 1998. Also, do you think it is man made? See, anyone against the notion of man made global warming is usually labelled a right winger and doesn’t want to clean up our society with new technology. Here’s a plan: Let’s drill anywhere and everywhere we can WHILE establishing wind, wave, solar, etc. The mere notion we are drilling will cause OPEC to take notice and speculation for future oil will show more supply n the way, which would lower prices. Meanwhile, we establish our new technology and soon we tell OPEC to charge what they want while we have enough for us. Obama said he had a 10 year plan, but we have heard nothing since he took office. See, we’re all not right wingers, but to even think man can change mother nature is ludicrous.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
How much do you think Gibbs gets paid to say this stuff with a straight face?
Posted by: Shane | November 5, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
“Yes, they are, but we are cooling not warming from 1998.”
While the rate of warming has slowed over the last 10 years, the earth has not gotten cooler.
2005 was the 2nd hottest year after 1998.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 5, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“tierra—- What part of the polls I posted did you not understand?”
_____________________________________
I understand the poll you posted very well and my interpretation of those polls is different from yours – if you have disagreements with my interpretation you can try to counter them.
“The majority of Americans are against this legislation.”‘
______________________________________
I don’t think so. I think the majority of Americans still don’t really know what’s in ‘this’ legislation, are really tired of the misinformation and bickering – and would like to see what the final outcome really is – and they do support a public option, no doubt about that.
ALL the polls show a majority of Americans supporting a public option – up until recently they were never assured there would be one.
Posted by: tierra | November 5, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
I’ll take the Republican solution over the costly Democrat solution thank you.
Posted by: Jenny | November 5, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
tierra —- My posts are black and white and need no interpretation. Those polls I posted were on this legislation, not the public option. Lie all you want to support your party, but don’t pull the BS “interpretation” crap. There was absolutely no reason for interpretation.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
If you geophysicists want to debate long-term warming (or cooling for that matter) please realize that temporary shifts are really meaningless.As far as recent warming,the fact that ocean temperatures have not changed in the past 10 years would indicate that what ever warming that took place is insignificant(as reported on NPR).However, even the claims about recent years being the warmest on record are not accurate.Can anybody give me an example of one of Dr. Hansen’s gloom and doom predictions that has actually occured? Can anybody explain why Al Gore’s prediction of more (and more violent) hurricanes secondary to global warming has not happened?What is Boyle’s Law?
Posted by: Nephron | November 5, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“”"”Sorry, there are still people left with functioning brains.”"”"”
Posted by: tierra
Please, when you find one, let us know.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“There was absolutely no reason for interpretation.”
___________________________________
Now you’re showing your ignorance of polling, the format of the questions asked and the milieu in which it takes place. Do some research.
Posted by: tierra | November 5, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Tierra: It bears reposting so here it is: “”"”The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 42% now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That’s down from 45% a week ago but unchanged from two weeks ago. Fifty-four percent (54%) now oppose the legislative effort, up three points since last week. “”"”
do you wish for me to interpret this or did you find that functioning brain we talked about?
Posted by: lfrichar | November 5, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
“You seem to think hysterical right wing media erases everybody’s memory of recent history. Sorry, there are still people left with functioning brains.”
There has been a great deal of mainstream media and liberal opinion journalism in the past 48 hours discussing the serious dangers facing Democrats as evidenced by Tuesday’s results.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
I don’t believe Pelosi would schedule the vote unless she has the votes for passage. I believe the bill will pass with 218 votes, after a careful pairing votes so that those considered most vulnerable in 2010 will be able to cast a “no” vote while knowing that the measure will pass.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
“There was absolutely no reason for interpretation.”
___________________________________
Now you’re showing your ignorance of polling, the format of the questions asked and the milieu in which it takes place. Do some research.
The majority of Americans consistently support a public option. For a long time there has been no assurance a public option would be included in the final act.
When Americans are still unsure of what is going to be in a final bill – why would they support it?
Posted by: tierra | November 5, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Cap n Trade is theft on a massive, global scale.
Posted by: Janet | Nov 5, 2009 4:45:26 PM
______________________________________
Nonsense. You think one web site is going to present to you all the answers regarding greenhouse gases and global warming? You’ve been duped. Study some legitimate research.
Posted by: tierra | November 5, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Looks like the “6 page glossy brochure” has morphed into 230 pages and the “countdown” may end soon:
“A 230-page draft was obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press. A spokeswoman for Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said changes were still being made before the bill would be finalized in time to offer as an alternative when Democrats begin floor debate on their bill, possibly at the end of this week.”
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 5, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Man’s greatest arrogance: “I control the earth’s climate!”
(Now recycling I’m in favor of and practice wholeheartedly.)
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 5, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
“Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., told the crowd, ‘Republicans have better ideas to give you more choices, more freedom in health care, access for everybody…”
Just another in a long list of GOP lies about HC. The GOP plan would only cover an additional 3 million people and provide no protection from insurance companies cutting loose serious ill customers.
The Dem plan would add coverage for over 10 times that many people.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 5, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Wow, the ny post just published the Obama/Pelosicare numbers:
“First, we need to get past the misleading accounting games. Each bill is routinely “scored” for its 10-year costs from 2010-19. Yet this includes several years when the spending wouldn’t yet have kicked in. According to the Congressional Budget Office, fully 99.9 percent of the Pelosi bill’s costs would hit from 2013 onward. Similarly, 98.3 percent of Reid’s spending would come after 2014.
Reid: Championing a fiscal nightmare.
If you start the tally when the bills’ spending would actually start (in 2013 for the House bill and 2014 for the Senate bill), then the bills’ real 10-year costs become clear — and are remarkably similar.
The CBO reports that, in their true first 10 years, the House bill would cost $1.8 trillion, and the Senate bill would cost $1.7 trillion. Pelosi would raise Americans’ taxes by $1.1 trillion over that period, while Reid would hike them by $1 trillion.
And the House bill would siphon about $800 billion from Medicare to spend it elsewhere, while the Senate bill would suck out about $900 billion.”
These people will do and say anything to jam it down our throats. I would check out the rest at the nypost.
Posted by: Janet | November 5, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
chiara:” wonder how long they can treat the opposition (and really almost anyone who doesn’t fall in line with them)” — You have a short memory if you can’t remember that this was the very policy by which Bush ran his WH for 8 yrs. Back at cha!
Posted by: mangalor | November 5, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
“Looks like the “6 page glossy brochure” has morphed into 230 pages and the “countdown” may end soon”
Only 4 months after promised.
The bill’s “reforms” which are mostly giveaways to insurance companies include letting insurance companies move to states with less regulation and sell their policies from there, there is no requirement regarding pre existing conditions and basically this bill will “save money” by not covering any additional people and allowing the insurance companies to provide less coverage for the same money.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 5, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
“My solution is for the government to stay the hell out of my life.”
Then do ONE THING to get govt. out of your life. Stop driving on any road built by any govt. Can you do that? It’s just one little thing to show that you stand by your principles.
After all, the govt. not only builds roads, but it maintains them -so tell them to take their roads and go to blazes. Stop supporting the govt. control of roadways which is just another way to take away your freedom to drive anywhere you please.
After all, why let the govt. tell you which side of the road you have to drive on or that you can’t leave the roadway and take off over the countryside?
Can you do that one little thing to show other Americans how easy it is to get govt. interference out of their lives?
And if you can do that one thing then we can start talking about weaning you off of fire depts, police depts, water and sewage services and schools that get govt. funds.
GOOD LUCK!
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 5, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
We have the VERY best Health Care in the World.
The issue is insurance. Can anyone say FEMA ? and Flood insurance.
We see how well the Federal Goverment handles insurance. WHY would anyone want a Federal Employee to handle your medical insurance???????
Posted by: Gale Marshall | November 5, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
ifrichar:”There was absolutely no reason for interpretation.” — Any time conservatives and republocos are involved ‘interpretation’ is critical. As evidence I cite the great job this group of baffoons did when they interpreted all available data to finally determine that WMDs could be found around every corner in Iraqnam. To this day cons and repubs fear scrutiny of any type.
Posted by: mangalor | November 5, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Meanwhile, on the amateur foreign policy front:
President Obama came into office insisting that his administration would press hard and fast to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But after nine months, analysts and diplomats say, the administration’s efforts have faltered in part because of its own missteps.
As Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made clear during her Middle East trip, which ended Wednesday, U.S. officials are now promoting new tactics — what they called the “baby steps” of lower-level talks — to bring the Israeli and Palestinian leaders together for direct talks.
But the dynamics have changed since Obama named a special envoy to the region on his second day in office and tried to make a fresh start. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, whom the administration once would have been happy to see undermined, has been strengthened — while Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, whom the administration had hoped to bolster, has been weakened.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
“The majority of Americans are against this legislation.”‘
Can I be any clearer?
lfrichar | Nov 5, 2009 3:28:52 PM
Polls do NOT clearly show that “the majority of Americans are against this legislation.” But perhaps you could clearly define what you mean by “this legislation” – which bill has been polled on?
Posted by: jhw539 | November 5, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Did I say “amateur?”
Daniel Levy, a veteran Israeli peace negotiator now at the Century Foundation in Washington, summed up the administration’s efforts in recent days as “amateur night at the Apollo Theater.” He said the administration did not game out the consequences of its demands on the parties — and then flinched. “They just dug deeper and deeper their own grave,” he said. “All of this talk of negotiations doesn’t cut the mustard in the region.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Americans have spoken again and again. We DON’T WANT your health care package ! Fix the things that need fixing, like tort reform, ect… Quit trying to jam something down our throats that we have no interest in. Just wait until 2010. There are going to be a whole bunch of liberal former Congressional people and Senators looking for work. Just the way it should be. Oh, and Gibbs. I can’t say what I really think of this clown, because you wouldn’t print it. Let’s just say he is the “simplest” tool I’ve ever seen.
Posted by: XD9 | November 5, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
We do not have the best health care in the world. But this so called health care bill will not make what we have any better it only covers the uninsured and unless you havent had insurance for the past 6 months you are not eligible to get public option. So we are forcing those who dont have insurance to buy insurance. Those protests were to try to get the option for everyone.
Posted by: earl | November 5, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
since when is a solution required to argue the point that the pelosi/reed bills are bad???
those two bills are bad, period! i have no solution and i don’t need one. Nothing at this point is better than wasting trillions of dollars.
Actually, here’s an idea, FIX THE ECONOMY!! Unemployment’s almost at 10%, and “fixing” health care will not change that!!!
It’s the economy, Stupid!
Posted by: jnewhouse | November 5, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
The Republican bill is nothing more than a political ploy designed to counter Democrats’ real efforts toward health care reform. Even writers at the American Spectator are totally unimpressed.
Posted by: Alyson
Agreed but there are a few good ideas that get zero play from the Dems.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | November 5, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Wow, the ny post just published the Obama/Pelosicare numbers:
“First, we need to get past the misleading accounting games. Each bill is routinely “scored” for its 10-year costs from 2010-19. Yet this includes several years when the spending wouldn’t yet have kicked in. According to the Congressional Budget Office, fully 99.9 percent of the Pelosi bill’s costs would hit from 2013 onward. Similarly, 98.3 percent of Reid’s spending would come after 2014.
Reid: Championing a fiscal nightmare.
If you start the tally when the bills’ spending would actually start (in 2013 for the House bill and 2014 for the Senate bill), then the bills’ real 10-year costs become clear — and are remarkably similar.
The CBO reports that, in their true first 10 years, the House bill would cost $1.8 trillion, and the Senate bill would cost $1.7 trillion. Pelosi would raise Americans’ taxes by $1.1 trillion over that period, while Reid would hike them by $1 trillion.
And the House bill would siphon about $800 billion from Medicare to spend it elsewhere, while the Senate bill would suck out about $900 billion.”
These people will do and say anything to jam it down our throats. I would check out the rest at the nypost.
Well said. This is madness and must but voted down. Tort reform has to happen before anything else for the system to be streamlined.
The problem is the trial lawyers are the number one donors to the Democrat/Government machine.
The Republicans had better stop this or they are done as a party. This is outrageous.
Posted by: yamal | November 5, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
As I have said here before: I am a practicing Nurse Practitioner in the state of NJ. I’ve practiced for nearly 20 years in this capacity, in many, many different health care delivery systems. My friends are in the field of health care and there are many, many people that I’ve developed close associations with along my career.
NOT ONE BACK THIS BILL. NOT ONE !!! NOT ONE !!!
It’s bad for the economy, it’s bad for the health of this community we call America and it’s very bad for the practice of medicine, which is so much more than dispensing pills….it’s an art and a science….OBAMA will never get this.
Call your doctor. Call your NP. Call your pharmacist.
ASK THEM.
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 5, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
“NOT ONE BACK THIS BILL. NOT ONE !!! NOT ONE!” — More insurance industry rubbish from the extremely gullible. A group of NW doctors are touring the country refuting this talking point and revealing the fact that MOST medical professionals want some form of health care legislation that covers ALL Americans. The good thing is the right has been lying to America for 8+ years and intelligent Americans know this and aren’t going to buy it anymore. As always, the right wing minority will revel in their cluelessness.
Posted by: mangalor | November 5, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“As I have said here before: I am a practicing Nurse Practitioner in the state of NJ. I’ve practiced for nearly 20 years in this capacity, in many, many different health care delivery systems. My friends are in the field of health care and there are many, many people that I’ve developed close associations with along my career.”
Its supported by the AMA.
The Nurses Unions prefer single payer versus this effort.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 5, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
How dare celebraties voice their political opinion. You’d never hear politics from Sean Penn, Whoopi, Rosie O’Donnell, Jane Fonda, David Letterman…shall I continue?
Posted by: Zeke | November 5, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
The only way the taxpayers will get a good health care program is if congress and yes, even the president have the same health care as the rest of the country. This is what the protesters should be fighting for. I guarantee we would have good health care, medicare and prescriptions. Also, they need to be on Social Security, I bet then we would get a cost of living raise. Oh I forgot there is no inflation for SS receipants, but apparantly there is for congress since they voted themselves a 6% cost of living increase. How dare this administration cut medicare by 500 billion dollars. I have an idea, how about cutting the president’s air travel by 500 billion.
Posted by: Linda | November 5, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Pretty cheeky of Gibbs, considering the President’s own “plan” is about 2.5 pages of goals.
Why can’t he just say, “I know some people disagree with us and we respect that, but….” ?
Posted by: MayBee | November 5, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
It’s not very often I get so mad that I feel like crying, but now is one of those times. These are everyday folks, worried about what this healthcare bill could do to the ever increasing deficit, worried about how it will affect them, angry that abortion will be covered with FEDERAL funds, and so on and so on…and what do they get? A WH spokesman who has no respect for anyone and has no clue what it means to have a “real job” and live in a “real world”. Why are these people (and millions of others) concerned about this bill? Why have all these people come out to protest? Because they haven’t been told ANYTHING. There is so much junk in this healthcare bill, so much spending and no proof of “cutting costs” besides the tired old “waste, fraud and abuse”. The administration has gone back and forth on what the bill contains, how much it costs, who it covers, etc. to the point that we, the American public, the people who pay the taxes to support their pork laden butts, have NO IDEA what to believe.
The liberals nearly have a stroke every time someone says the slightest bad thing about Obama, but it’s perfectly fine for him and his little frat boy crew in DC to make fun of anyone and everyone they choose to. Boy, that’s really showing some class.
Posted by: Shoe | November 5, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Here’s some wonderful news:
..But Democrats are likely to fall far short of their goal of passing legislation in the full Senate before Copenhagen as Boxer’s bill lacks enough support for full approval.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
“According to PEW, most Americans don’t think we have the best health care in the world.”
Lemme see…although they’re against the Dems’ current bill, that doesn’t matter because they don’t know what’s in it. But on the other hand they’re really up to speed on other nations’ healthcare. (And of course it’s a certainty that if the Dems’ bill passes, ours will improve.)
Works for me…
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
here’s the joke – Gibbs says “I’d like to give a shout out to Voight”
Posted by: Lynne | November 5, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
President Obama’s own Organizing for America has organized call-in protests and letter writing protests. All to support a non-specific health care reform.
When OFA asked people to sign letters pledging *support* for reform, there was no bill written, no specific plans. OFA didn’t even ask supporters to demand specific reforms- just to support whatever Obama would eventually say he wanted.
Last month they organized a call-in drive, to flood Congressional offices with “support” for the Obama plan. Which is not even specific enough to say if there is a public option on the table.
That’s ok with Gibbs, but going to Washington to be against the current bill is not?
They need to learn to listen to and acknowledge the validity of criticism, even if they eventually disagree.
Posted by: MayBee | November 5, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
I for one can’t wait for them to vote on this bill. Then we’ll finally know which Blue “lap” Dog Democrats with have the bullseye on their back in just under 12 very short months!
Posted by: T-Man | November 5, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Did Gibbs give a “shout out” before the presser? Just axing.
Posted by: Jeff | November 5, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Ryan:
The AMA represents less than 20 percent of practicing physicians.
Nurses unions represent less than 6 percent of professional nurses. The “nurses” unions are comprised mostly of nurses aides or home health aides.
Once again smoke and mirrors from the WH. I know from my own experience that health care professionals are united AGAINST this bill.
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 5, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
You are so correct Allyson. Morons have been given WAY too much respect. Starting with 1600.
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 5, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
The amateurs parade before us, with the security of the nation and the lives of our troops in the balance:
When it was reported that Abdullah was thinking about withdrawing, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s response was inane: “We see that happen in our own country where, for whatever combination of reasons, one of the candidates decides not to go forward. I don’t think it has anything to do with the legitimacy of the election.” So, Afghanistan is just like America — candidates decide “not to go forward.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
And suppose Sarah Palin has said that?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
*had* said that.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
If the election of a Democrat in the White House and Dems in Congress hasn’t done anything else, it’s shown what a bunch of hypocrites liberals/Dems are when it comes to protests. When it’s anti-war or any other type of left wing protest, no matter how irrational it is, it’s fine. If it’s conservatives protesting a so-called “health care bill” it’s terrible.
Posted by: MissButterfly | November 5, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
I am so tired of the claims that the Republican Party have no solutions. Have they been asked to come to the table to present an alternative without be shot down with being called racist, selfish, greedy, etc, etc, etc. I have never in my life seen such leaders acting like such stupid childish fools. Its time for the country to pull together and QUIT fighting. When someone really comes up with solutions they will not only gain the support of the American People they will have their loyalty for a long long time.
Posted by: Nancy | November 5, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
And by the way: does your carbon footprint increase when you get really fat?
“WASHINGTON: Former US vice president Al Gore, who has campaigned relentlessly on green issues, is on track to become the world’s first “carbon billionaire” amid claims of profiting from the climate change agenda… Gore’s personal fortune has risen from 1.2 million pounds to an estimated 60 million pounds, according to a report in the Daily Telegraph newspaper.”
Does anybody want to tell us whether Mr. Gore’s profits are “obscene?”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 5, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
“And suppose Sarah Palin has said that?”
Sarah would never say such a thing about “our neighboring country of Afghanistan.”
Posted by: WWW | November 5, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Robin Gibbs would be better served as a comedian on SNL. His defensive quips are wearing thin. Then again, it can’t be an easy job being the mouthpiece for an administration such as the one we have now.
As for his comment about small businesses that are dropping health insurance because it’s not affordable, I think he’d best check some facts. As co-owner in a small business, we pay 100% of our employees health insurance. And so does another small biz owner friend of mine. And we do it at our own expense.
That smamry comment about Voight’s performance in Deliverance speaks volumes. Deflect Deflect Deflect. So very sad.
Posted by: Rebecca | November 5, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
“As co-owner in a small business, we pay 100% of our employees health insurance. And so does another small biz owner friend of mine. And we do it at our own expense.”……If that’s true then I would like to thank you on behalf of your employees and the people of America that may want to convince their employer to follow your model……..I understand that you may not want to face a law that requires you to do that which you already provide, but surely you recognize that not all businesses are as enlightened as you.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 5, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
I am getting tired of the old “pre-existing conditions” line that is coming out of Gibbs and all the other Dems mouth and ate up by every sucker out there that doesn’t understand insurance and why you buy the level of coverage that is appropriate for you.
The biggest scam is when someone doesn’t carry insurance right now, gets sick, knows it and then applies for insurance either through their employer or they buy it themselves and then provide claims to cover their expensive procedure/treatment. These frauds thought they could get away with not paying for insurance or buy a policy that was the bare minimum coverage and then they cry that they had their insurance pulled because of a pre-exisiting condition. Complete fraud and you suckers fall for it everytime Gibbs or Obama repeat it like Liberal Orthodoxy. These people are bilking the system.
And Democrats want to destroy the best Healthcare system in the world, because some fraudulent hucksters pull at their heartstings. Liberals always have such good intentions, but such awful outcomes. The laws of unintended consequences will bite us all in the tail. That is why I am not a Lib any longer.
Posted by: Brian | November 6, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
As a Canadian, I shake my head at the way the far right has ruined civil discourse in the United States. We have a conservative Prime Minister, and I and the majority of left wing Canadians would never shout vile language at the leader of our country. Its alright to disagree with Obama’s policies, but the personal attacks are disgusting. What kind of person thinks its okay to hold a sign comparing health care reform to the Dachau concentration camp?
Posted by: Chris | November 6, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am
This is typical of the Obama administration and his yes-men. When the GOP has a hollywood star like Voight show up at one of their rallys, they make a joke of it and try to minimize their presence. Yet when liberal toadie suck-ups like Oprah, and the rest of the famous liberal ilk “visit” the whitehouse, or speak on Obama’s behalf, somehow their credibility is actual and sincere. But to be honest, nothing the Liar-In-Chief says or does surprises me anymore.
Posted by: Machod | November 6, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am
When the GOP has a hollywood star like Voight show up at one of their rallys, they make a joke of it and try to minimize their presence.
_______________________________________
He refrained from making a joke about John Voight, but implied one could be made. Is there some joke that’s supposed to be made about John Voight? I don’t get this exchange at all. What was Tapper’s point? What was Gibbs’ point?
Posted by: tierra | November 6, 2009, 4:20 am 4:20 am
Ignorant Republicans – we will pass a health care bill without you – and only 20% of voters now consider themselves Republicans – you are out numbered now – and you will be out numbered in 2010. Your greed, racism, and un-Americanism is showing who you really are. Real Americans care that their fellow citizens are dying because they don’t have health care. Your treatment of the President of the United States is appalling and hateful – you should hang your heads in shame. Christ will judge you – the bible says “What you did not do for the least of you, you did not do for me.”
Posted by: Kate1149 | November 6, 2009, 7:04 am 7:04 am
The thing about Gibbs is that when he is being funny no one laughs.
When he does he double-talk-shuffle he is a complete frigging joke. The irony is that he is being serious.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | November 6, 2009, 7:42 am 7:42 am
Chris says “What kind of person thinks its okay to hold a sign comparing health care reform to the Dachau concentration camp?”
____________
This is not even close to the personal attacks that come from the left to the leadership of this country, past and present. This may have been in bad taste but it was far from a personal attack against the President or the Democratic leadership. On this blog and others the vile things that are said about the Right are astonishing.
So where is your concern when the left is personally attacking the right? Or is this selective outrage? If it complies with your point of view then, well, they get a pass. if it is even slightly distasteful and doesn’t comply you blame the right has ruined civil discourse in the United State”
I walk away shaking my head because you seem to have missed the real juicy stuff and are stopped dead in your tracks on a quip.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | November 6, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am
Anyone who thinks health care is the issue here is wrong. Its money period
They don’t give a rats A$$ about us. If however, we die close to 65 and they tax the you know what out of us that is a win win. It solves the social security problem and the deficit.
Wake up. These snake oil salesmen need to go. Bring out the National Razor. Wright on the mall. Line em up Joe!
Posted by: Mr infidel | November 6, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am
It is absolute hypocrisy for anyone on the left to talk about “vile signs” when the last 5 years the left was worse. I am not even a Bush voter or even a republican. All I can say is if the Statists pass this bill and Cap & Trade the “progressives” (are they going by this now or is it liberal?)will be a perminate minority in government. When we are losing 500,000 jobs a month, I would think jobs and making a living so people could AFFORD TO EAT without standing in line for 5 hours at a food bank would make more sense than this health care plan.Get a job get insurance! What a concept, and something that the Republican bill does that the Statist bill doesn’t is it actually lowers COSTS and is not going to cost 2.4 trillion like Pelosicare!
Posted by: David L. Indiana | November 6, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
The problem is, Gibbs, that the current reform bill isn’t a solution either.
In fact, it’s worse.
Nice intention, to tell everyone that someone else will pay, but all it will do is eat up the people’s money.
Posted by: Anthony Rose | November 6, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am
“anybody that watches (the rally) is struck by the fact that there’s a rally going on without a solution on their side.”
Note to Gibbs: The solution will become clear in 2010 and 2012.
Posted by: axlenut | November 6, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
We need reform. HR 3962 isn’t it.
It wasn’t it at 1017 pages and it’s not it at 2032 pages.
The Old Testament is fewer pages than this. HELLO?????
Posted by: PFMinTN | November 6, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Jon Voight need to “rally” his daughter’s support for his “rotten arse”. (ANGE DON’T ALLOW THIS IDIOT TO INDOCTRINATE YOUR CHILDREN, KEEP THEM AWAY FROM THIS IDIOT…WE DON’T NEED ANY MORE OF THEM). She doesn’t even want him around, so what make you think You can tell me anything. Get some decency and a clue Voight, YOU GET YOUR PHILOSOPHY AND BELIEFS FROM “ANOTHER COUNTRY” BECAUSE YOU DON’T LIVE IN OUR WORLD ….the last movie I watched of yours was in the 1970′s because Walken was in it….
Posted by: sara | November 6, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
“Chris as a Canadian” the far right as you call them who have reduced the civil discourse in this nation are taking lessons from their friends on the left. What scares those on the left is even as we shout we also use facts and truth. Yes our emotions are high because we see the end of America as we know it. This congress and administration has our nation on a one way ticket to hell and we want to stop it. The republicans have offered a helth care bill but try to get it in the lamestream media. The dems want control of people because that equals power.
Posted by: John | November 6, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Protests ‘without a solution’ Mr. Gibbs? You mean like the “final solution’ that the Democrats have for seniors? Deny them medical care and accelerate their demise? This will eliminate costs to the government for medical care. It will reduce costs for social security payments (the old will die sooner). It will also increase estate taxes. The elderly will die with larger estates so they will be over the limit. So the ‘final solution’ that is obama care is quite similar to Hitler’s ‘final solution’ to the Jewish problem. Eliminate them. You are too fat to be a good Goebels stand-in. You are right. Republicans don’t have a solution to kill the elderly. We defend the right of the individual to the health care that they have paid medicare premiums for. Government as evil care denying HMO? That’s your plan? That’s how you are ‘reforming health insurance’? Good luck with that. By the way which group will you target next for early demise? AIDS carriers? Those with high cholesterol? Diabetics?
Posted by: kwills | November 6, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
So now the White House press secretary has taken it upon himself to be a political pundit? I thought his job was to answer the questions the press asks…not to run his yap like he’s turning in a performance on the Leno show.
Posted by: Momma | November 6, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Smug. Smarmy. Rookie…
Posted by: jonec1200 | November 6, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
“Smug. Smarmy. Rookie…” You just described George Bush’s first year. And Ronald Reagan’s first year. And Bill Clinton’s first year. And Teddy Roosevelt’s first year. And Herbert Hoover’s first year. etc, etc, etc
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 6, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Lies, Lies, Lies. Gibbs you lie.
The Democrats have no Health care plan
their bill is an assault on freedom and an act of tyrany. This bill is a threat to America more severe than any terrorist. The Republicans offered several very good plans that were shot down by Dems and the media never covered it.
Posted by: Roger | November 6, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
“I thought his job was to answer the questions the press asks…”… Then you don’t know a whole lot about the office of White House Press Secretary. They are responsible for providing public information, fielding questions (notice the work “fielding” not necessarily “answering”) and presenting the administration’s position. They are the communication arm of the President and his administrtaion……Didn’t you ever watch the “West Wing”? You should you could learn a lot about how govt. works.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 6, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Well at least we know Gibbs understand that it is a represntative democracy…but he doesn’t understand that its not our job to come up with the solution…its the job of the people we represent…when their solution doesn’t meet the needs of the majority we hire(vote) for someone else…i don’t understand why the dems in the white house can’t understand that …in fact they loathe it because they tghink they are smarter than everybody else
Posted by: phillysmart | November 6, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
I think they do have a solution. The elections of 2010.
I just hope the Democrats continue to ignore what is happening. It will make the task of replacing the tax and spenders just that more easy.
Posted by: saintknowitall | November 6, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Kate1149 said “Christ will judge you – the bible says “What you did not do for the least of you, you did not do for me.”-
Christ was speaking to the Church, not Caesar. Plus, what happened to the lefts desire for separation of church and state? Are you going to force non-believers to to follow Christ’s teachings?
Posted by: saintknowitall | November 6, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
“…when their solution doesn’t meet the needs of the majority we hire(vote) for someone else…i don’t understand why the dems in the white house can’t understand that…”
Of course they understand that – how do you think they got into the White House? And those of you chomping at the bit for 2010 – you can’t even win a heavily Republican House district. Old Bill Hoffman will tell you – don’t go counting your victories before the vote.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 6, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Gibbs said the line that I’d like to give you”..
I think we have identified the problem. You see Mr. Gibbs we don’t want “a line”. We would like you to answer the questions without sounding like a smart mouthed 4th grader making personal attacks on those that disagree with your boss’ beliefs and policies.
Posted by: saintknowitall | November 6, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
“what happened to the lefts desire for separation of church and state? Are you going to force non-believers to to follow Christ’s teachings?”
Of course not, that’s not our bag. You have to look to the GOP for the “only Christians need apply” sign on the door.
But just because we don’t think that religion should be an institution of the state, doesn’t mean that it’s not a part of our personal philosophy.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 6, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
OBWAN222 – Well if you will listen to your democratic leadership, that is EXACTLY what they are saying. The One is even talking about the Bible.
Posted by: saintknowitall | November 6, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
“The One is even talking about the Bible.”
Yeah, so….. There’s no law against talking about religion (although the cons will try to convince there is). The law says you can’t write religion into the law.
Besides what makes you think that Christians have a monopoly on love for their fellow man? Laws that provide for the less fortunate don’t have to be inspired by the New Testiment.
“You shall honor your parents and regard the relatives, the orphans, and the poor. You shall treat the people amicably. You shall observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) and give the obligatory charity (Zakat).”
“Once the Buddha and Ananda visited a monastery where a monk was suffering from a contagious disease. The poor man lay in a mess with no one looking after him. The Buddha himself washed the sick monk and placed him on a new bed. Afterwards, he admonished the other monks. “Monks, you have neither mother nor father to look after you. If you do not look after each other, who will look after you? Whoever serves the sick and suffering, serves me.”"
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 6, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
“After the use of that term…”
Oh get YOUR mind out of the gutter. It’s a simple word like bang or backdoor or melons or any other word that can sound dirty to people with dirty minds.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 6, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Since when does the press secretary give talking points about the bills being presented in Congress?
If the press secretary is now part of the propaganda machine, can we believe anything coming from the Whitehouse?
Posted by: NC77 | November 6, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Small clarification with large distinction; we live in a Representative Republic, or maybe even a Democratic Republic. Not a Democracy. We are represented by people who are hemmed in by law (the Constitution).
Posted by: Rich | November 6, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
“Since when does the press secretary give talking points about the bills being presented in Congress?”
OH, like since, forever.
If you don’t believe me maybe you’ll believe Bush’s Press Secretary:
Q: Define your job for me. I know Scott in the book says that his job — he believed his job was to advance the agenda of the President of the United States.
MS. PERINO: Sure it is.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | November 6, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I see that Obama, Pelosi & Reid continue to miss the point of the 2008 election. They misread this election at their peril. The emperor’s glow is not transferable . What the MSM has not discussed are the many local elections for town and county offices that took place on Tuesday. Many democratic incumbents have been turned out of office. The Democratic Weschester county executive was defeated by a large margin. The Nassau county legislature went Republican after eight years of Democratic majority. A Popular Nassau county executive is in a virtual tie for reelection necessitating the impounding of the voting machines and a recount. These local election results were repeated in statewide and local races in Pennsylvania and throughout the United States. If you were an incumbent Democrat this year, your reelection was much more difficult. The electorate is frustrated and angry; they are tired of being lied to and lied about. Ignore the electorate at your peril. They will have the last word in 2010. election.
Posted by: Al | November 6, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Gibbs is a disgrace to this country, and Obama for selecting him as press sec’t
Posted by: Barberqueen | November 6, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
If any of the health care reform naysayers find themselves without health insurance coverage one day, they can call Jon Voight or Jon Ratzengerger to help pay their medical bills and keep them from going into bankruptcy because of medical bills.
Posted by: Ron | November 6, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
“Deliverance” was funny.
Posted by: Brian | November 6, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I read Gibbs’s remarks and immediately conjured up the image of Rush Limbaugh squealing like a pig.
Posted by: TheOldSchool | November 6, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Obwan222 – You have no moral authority anymore. Give it up.
Posted by: saintknowitall | November 6, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
OBWAN222 – so let me get this strait, if the Bush administration did it, it is OK for the Obama administration, right? 2 wrongs make a right? Unbelievable. But that is the logic you liberals use all the time.
Thought you voted for change. LOL
Posted by: saintknowitall | November 6, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Clown Giggs never has a coherent answer…Such an idiot!
Posted by: Linda C in Cal | November 6, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
I can’t wait until 2010/2012… Deliverance
Posted by: CB | November 6, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Not to worry – Gibbs won’t even warrant a footnote in history. I have to agree that his fourth-grade smarmy comments are grating – evidence of weak parentage.
Posted by: ElDiaOctavo | November 6, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
What spin! “anybody that watches (the rally) is struck by the fact that there’s a rally going on without a solution on their side.” Is it OK to ridicule the voices of warning when it’s obvious that the government is on a course to disaster? This is ridiculing just because there is no rational way to do what the administration’s is hell-bent on doing. An analogy would be this: The government is trucking down the road and ignores posted signs that the bridge ahead is not structurally sound enough to support the load being hauled. The trucker ignores the signs because there are no alternate routes posted and is hell-bent on delivering the load in one trip. So he blows past the signs. The bridge in this analogy is the economy. The economy is supported by the privately employed work force that is dwindling. The load is the growing government workforce, entitlements, health care for the uninsured,… basically everything that the government relies upon the private sector to pay for through taxes. Since the bridge is loosing it’s private sector strength it is doomed to fail under the approaching load. So just because the alternate plans are not so grandiose by themselves does not mean there are no alternatives. The load on the truck needs to broken down into smaller loads to succeed in the delivery. These protester understand the need for reform and the ultimate objective of quality health care for all. We can never achieve that by being irrational and putting on blinders.
Posted by: TX_MBell | November 6, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Gibbs needs to understand that many of us do not find him amusing or trustworthy. He had best watch his backside.
Posted by: Leadrunner | November 6, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Whine, complain. Loved the prior 8 years. Found no reason to demonstrate then as we moved into depression territory. Yes I have been to the brainwash right wing stations. I hope I covered it mostly.
Posted by: J. Richter | November 6, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Doesnt Gibbs ever get dizzy from all of the spinning? He probably was born dizzy, so that is normal for him.
Posted by: NTexas | November 6, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
1. Go ahead, Mr. Gibbs, ridicule half the nation by ridiculing one of the speakers that represented them yesterday. That last-century-Alinsky tactic is getting really old, kind of like continuing to blame our nation’s first 21st Century president for all the ills of the 21st Century.
2. Gibbs dismissal of one Republican bill is the only public explanation I know of on record discussing any alternatives. (Wyden’s? Why not? Mackey’s ideas? Why not? What would Mayo Clinic suggest? Why not?) My point is this: A methodical, public deliberation by Congress is a vital primary step for substantive change. The Worst.Congress.Ever arrogantly slid right past a transparent review of our health care system and the best ways to improve it, and instead patched together this Frankenstein in their backrooms.
The nation deserves a full, documented review of all the issues and alternatives and for Congress to be on record on why they won’t work.
That’s why I stood at my Congressman’s office yesterday with another 100 folks — in solidarity with others across the country and those on the Capitol steps — to say “Kill the Bill”. Start ALL over and do it right.
Posted by: Carol | November 6, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
I read Gibbs’s remarks and immediately conjured up the image of Rush Limbaugh squealing like a pig.
Posted by: TheOldSchool***************************
and if it sounds like one, it must be one….
Posted by: Spacerook1 | November 22, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm