Obama Calls for Further Review of Missed Warning Signs & Motives of Fort Hood Shooter

An Islamic, jihadist terrorist infiltrated the U.S. military. Any attempt to present it as something other than what it clearly is, is treasonist and worthy of impeachment. Ooops, my bad. It’s Bush’s fault!

Hasan was a muslim sympathizer. Our president is also a muslim sympathizer.
The defenders of political correctness do not want to categorize this event as an act of terrorism because by doing so, they are acknowleging that moderate, successful, mainstream American muslims are potential terrorists. It’s ok for the head of DHS to categorize Ron Paul supporters as potential terrorists but heaven forbit muslims get painted with the same brush.

The “quick to judge the cop in Cambridge” Hussain Obama says we need to investigate Hasan’s motives. When the muslim nut-case started indisrimainately shooting U.S. soldiers while shouting “Allah u akbar” it’s pretty clear what his motive was – to stop the enemy “infidels” from waging war on islamic turf. Duuuh!!

Listen barack, there is nothing to study, everything is plain as day……. well, maybe not to you.
Here is a tip, know your enemy!!

President Obama? Is there anything at all that your going to get accomplished during your only term that doesn’t make a majority of American’s “gasp” every morning?
Tina

“All of us should resist the temptation to turn this tragic event into the political theater that sometimes dominates the discussion here in Washington. The stakes are far too high.”
The gall of him saying that the day after him and Holder make the announcement about the 9/11 trials.

The Blamer-in-Chief say let the Blamer-in-Chief investigate whether the Blamer-in-Chief’s administration screwed up?
Sure sounds reasonable.

The fear of reprisal and the ridiculous blinders put on everyone worried about being politically correct kept this terrorist in the military.
Not all Muslims are terrorists but most international terrorists are Muslim. It’s a fact, it’t the world we are living in. You can’t change a jihadists mind by hugging him or her. Learn it. Live it.

Perfect, just like Democrats. Lets study the issue, that was already investigated to figure out what was already known to understand what was understood. Then have a meeting, on the meeting about the meeting when the meeting will be held, and another meeting on when that meeting where it will be held, and another meeting on when it will take place! Then make policies and pass laws on a bill that was 1000 pages long and never read that is full of pork and pet projects to make a new branch of government that will need more people who need a paycheck and fed bennifiets that is funded by newly created and increased taxes on the people.
I once seen a bumper sticker that said, “Government, if it ain’t broke, fix it til it is!” So true nowadays.

Is Obama delusional?
Does he believe this stuff or is he just trying to convince everyone to buy it?
Motives and possible missed warning signs? What?
I’d say Obama is in a full blown panic.
He knows this was a terrorist attack on his watch. And his new pc FBI blew it.

Let me guess what Obama’s response will be. All or some of the below:
-ban guns (even for military folks)
-eliminate “don’t ask don’t tell” and recruit more gays for the military
-ban certain guns (even for military)
-more diversity in the military (maybe more money for muslims, gays, women, foreigners, etc to join up)
-classes and diversity training instead of basic training in the military
-punish any perceived prejudgice, racism, or bad taste more than actual killings
-a more extreme hate speech bill that will apply to everyone- except a member of a minority faith, the enemy, members of the administration, or anyone of a non-white racial or ethnic identity or “straight” sexual orientation.

Obama seems to care more about the Muslim terrorists than the American people. Outrageous !!

President Obama’s speech in Japan was outstanding.

Tierra – Nope you got it all wrong. Theres a bunch of lazies in this group saying post this, post that, under their names. Like a sweetie, I type for them. Sorry if my space bends you out of shape. Have a nice day.

The army has alot to answer for. They could have weeded this guy out. There were plenty of signs. They promoted him with no interview or security check. He was becoming more radicalized and nobody noticed. So yeah, it has to be looked into.
By the way, 9/11 Commission decided not to assign blame for the failures. But they sure should have. Bush & Co had info from Clinton and reports right under their noses which they blew off.
The investigation has to be carried out. For too long the army has manipulated, covered up, failed to provide proper equipment, failed to provide proper care to wounded personnel, etc, etc, etc, etc.

By the way, 9/11 Commission decided not to assign blame for the failures. But they sure should have. Bush & Co had info from Clinton and reports right under their noses which they blew off.
Posted by: ibivi | Nov 14, 2009 5:42:29 PM
Somewhat related to this, there’s an interesting new book out called “The Ground Truth” by John Farmer,senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission, dean of the Rutgers School of Law and former attorney general of New Jersey. I haven’t read it yet but apparently Farmer offers proof offers further proof that Cheney lied about the events of 9/11. In addition, the FAA and NORAD altered critical documentary evidence to support the lies that Cheney told. There’s a review of the Book in the NYT sunday book review called “The lies they told.”
“Perhaps nothing perturbs Farmer more than the contention that high-ranking officials responded quickly and effectively to the revelation that Qaeda attacks were taking place. Nothing, Farmer indicates, could be further from the truth”
Farmer’s verdict: “History should record that whether through unprecedented administrative incompetence or orchestrated mendacity, the American people were misled about the nation’s response to the 9/11 attacks.”
Farmer explains that his hope is to lay some conspiracy theories to rest “by identifying and establishing the deception that actually did occur.”
Sounds very interesing.

If you have issues with Ron Paul, put them out there so we can debate them instead of meaningless slander.
Posted by: Huh | Nov 14, 2009 6:32:09 PM
First, I’m not the slanderer, but I actually was just reading something about Ron Paul’s son, Rand and the possibility that DeMint might challenge McConnell as Senate Minority leader.
“…Bowling Green ophthalmologist Rand Paul declined to say if he would support McConnell for another term as Senate GOP leader if he is challenged by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-South Carolina.
“I like both of them, and I don’t know that I could make a judgment. I have to win the primary first,” Paul said in the interview. “So I don’t think I’d make a judgment on how I’d vote for a leader, but I think obviously Kentucky having a leader is good for Kentucky. “
In a statement Wednesday, [Trey] Grayson [in next year's Republican U.S. Senate primary] said Paul’s remarks are a sign that he is more beholden to his “Libertarian donor base” than to his constituents in Kentucky.”
So, Kos (yes Kos of Daily Kos) thinks this means there’s still signs of a deep split in the GOP as DeMint has backed Rubio in Florida, Hoffman in NY-23, Chuck DeVor in CA, Toomey in PA. What do you think?

Scarletti – The more oversight the better. The Federal Reserve was one of chief architects of this financial collapse so they should receive considerable scrutiny. Obama pretty much put everyone that was responsible in the economic asset bubble’s buildup (Larry Summers, etc.) into his economic team so thinking that they will fix things is a pie-in-the-sky dream. This is particularly true since they are trying to do more of what led us to this economic mess, namely borrow and spend.
As far as Rand Paul goes: We need people like him because he is honorable. As far as supporting DeMint or McConnell: that is his business, and I have no real opinion on it. I would hope that he supports people that have integrity, and I am sure, judging by his father’s character, he will.

Mr. Obama, Ft hood killings is not something to study,but to avoid in the future.

The thirteen soldiers massacred at Fort Hood represent the first terrorist attack in US soil since 9/11. Obama and his administration are trying to downplay the entire thing for political reasons. I am not a Bush fan, but let’s face it, for seven years the Bush administration kept us safe without a single terrorist attack, it only took Obama 10 months for the first terrorist attack to happen, of all places in one of our own military installations, amazing isn’t it? We are right back to the same mentality before 9/11. Democrats do not know how to fight terrorists.

attack should not be turned into political theater,
Posted by: wizcat123
then tell republicans to shut up and not make it one

To AmericanPatroit:
Don’t ask “When will the Congress will stop this IDIOT-IN-CHIEF?” But ask when will THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA stops HELPING THE IDIOT! When will they ask him a tough question! I had a long lists of questions I wanted to ask during the campaign, but I had no chance to ask.
Without the help of the MSM, this PROPAGANDA-IN-CHIEF, FUNDRAISER-IN-CHIEF, CAMPAIGNER-IN-CHIEF, ORGANIZER-IN-CHIEF … how can he be our president?
He seemed scattered. He had no clue. He delay and delay and delay. No wonder he voted “O” most of the time when he was senator. No jounalists ever asked him a question regarding this, so strange! joke.

I feel so sad for the family members of the dead soldiers.
Posted by: talk from sf
what’s truly sad, is that everyone who seems ‘so concerned’ about Iraq & Afghanistan now from the ‘right’ , didn’t bother to open their collective mouths for 8 years to voice an opinion of dissent about the insane and criminal conduct and policies of Bush/Cheney