President Obama on Afghanistan Strategy: “It Is My Intention to Finish the Job”
President Obama Tuesday said that he would be “shortly” telling the American people how he intends to proceed in Afghanistan and Pakistan, arguing that during the Bush administration the US did not have “either the resources or the strategy to get the job done” but it is his “intention to finish the job.”
The president provided a glimpse as to his thinking on priorities in the area by underlining that counterterrorism was the priority.
“It is in our strategic interests, in our national security interests, to make sure that Al Qaida and its extremist allies cannot operate effectively” in the region, the president said. “We are going to dismantle and degrade their capabilities and ultimately dismantle and destroy their networks.”
The president did not that “Afghanistan’s stability is important to that process,” but he did not emphasis nation-building. He made his remarks at an event in the White House’s East Room with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
Mr. Obama would not give a date for when he would make his address to the nation to explain his new strategy – sources say it will likely be next Tuesday, December 1, but nothing has been locked in yet – but he said he feels “very confident that when the American people hear a clear rationale for what we’re doing there and how we intend to achieve our goals, that they will be supportive.”
Polls indicate that public support for the president’s handling of Afghanistan is waning, with 48% expressing disapproval of the President’s handling of the situation in Afghanistan, 45% expressing approval, in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll.
Accused by Republicans of taking too much time to come to a decision, the president said today that “the review that we’ve gone through has been comprehensive and extremely useful.”
Making note that he was standing with Prime Minister Singh, the president said that the Afghanistan mission is important “not just to the United States, but it’s important to the world.”
“The whole world, I think, has a core security interest in making sure that the kind of extremism and violence that you’ve seen emanating from this region is tackled, confronted in a serious way,” he said, adding that the strategy has to be conducted as “part of a broader international community. And so one of the things I’m going to be discussing is the obligations of our international partners in this process.”
The president is expected to officially ask NATO to provide 5,000-10,000 more troops when NATO leaders convene next month.
Alluding to benchmarks requiring progress for the Afghan government and the training of Afghan security forces that aides say are part of the new strategy, the president also noted that part of the new strategy would “recognize that the Afghan people ultimately are going to have to provide for their own security, and so we’ll be discussing that process whereby Afghan security forces are properly trained and equipped to do the job.”
He added that “it’s going to be important to recognize that, in order for us to succeed there, you’ve got to have a comprehensive strategy that includes civilian and diplomatic efforts.”
The reporter who asked President Obama about his decision teasingly said, “I suspect you don’t want my colleagues and I to rely on leaks until next week,” an allusion to President Obama’s stated irritation about the leaks about his decision-making process.’
“Why stop now?” the president joked.
He added that after Thanksgiving “if there are further questions, that we’ll be answering them to the satisfaction not just of you but to the satisfaction of the American people.”
-jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Oh Good. I was afraid Obama was going to let a public speaking opportunity go by without bashing Bush.
Posted by: MayBee | November 24, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
“It Is My Intention to Finish the Job”
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Posted by: Sigmonde | November 24, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
finishing the job is the right strategy. time to take the gloves off or admit that our departure will subject women and girls to the taliban way off life, which is not liberal by nature.
Posted by: catman | November 24, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
“I suspect you don’t want my colleagues and I to rely on leaks until next week”
At least now the leaks may actually be accurate – you can be sure that movement towards implementing the strategy has begun, so there is actually something for you find out now.
Posted by: jhw539 | November 24, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
“Finish the job”
What does that mean? (1) Killing everyone there since almost all identify with the more radical elements. (2) Turning them into a democracy. (3) Burning all the poppies giving them no livelihood. Just a big waste of my and other’s tax dollars.
Posted by: Huh | November 24, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
you can’t help but laugh at this quaint little man
Posted by: mickey maoist | November 24, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
just pull us out now. It will give you more cash to shower on your cronies and save us a few bucks in the process.
Please pull the troops out now president Obowmao. Bush blew it, we get it, but you have been in charge for almost a year now.
Posted by: mr45percent | November 24, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
The amazing shrinking president. He grows smaller with every speech. What an ingrate.
Posted by: Krakatoa | November 24, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
We can not afford all of this.
Bring the troops home and stop with the radical money printing and monetizing of the debt. Get some serious people around you instead of the corrupt Chicago cabal and you may get some support.
As it stands now, this is the least transparent administration in history with the craziest bunch of appointees we have ever seen.
Posted by: Amika d | November 24, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Ok you who cannot figure it out. For once we have a President who will take the time to think things out and orchestrate a plan and not just be reactionary to purely military reuests. It also appears that this time, he will try to build some consensus with our allies and not just put us in a position where it is “us against the world”. I guess that most of you just do not recognize the difference between a President that actually thinks versus one that just reacts.
Posted by: CND FOX | November 24, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Morons? That is just rude.
It would be nice if President Obama could think and act without trying to either discredit or insult the former president. Obama looks petty and insolent with his puffery and lack of manners but, it appears his devotees have the same bad manners.
Posted by: Krakatoa | November 24, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
“I guess that most of you just do not recognize the difference between a President that actually thinks versus one that just reacts.”
My God, if he thinks that slow it’s a wonder he even thinks to get out of bed, and then has climb back in bed at night.
Posted by: J. Wilder | November 24, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
The amazing shrinking president. He grows smaller with every speech. What an ingrate.
_____________________________________
You obviously have not been watching his speeches, probably just sound bites.
Anyone who watched his recent speeches in Japan and China knows the speeches remain strong and inspiring.
Posted by: tierra | November 24, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
It would be nice if President Obama could think and act without trying to either discredit or insult the former president.
_____________________________________
Obama does both ‘think and act’ without discrediting Bush – almost all the time.
Posted by: tierra | November 24, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
He doesn’t have the stomach for what he would have to do, to finish the job.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | November 24, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Yet another little jab at his predecessor. IMHO, a sign of a small, petty man.
Posted by: Jen | November 24, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Yet another little jab at his predecessor. IMHO, a sign of a small, petty man.
___________________________________
He’s consistent. He attacked Bush’s approach all through the election campaign as abandoning the war in Afghanistan and not containing the people who attacked America on 9/11.
Posted by: tierra | November 24, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Yet another little jab at his predecessor. IMHO, a sign of a small, petty man.
___________________________________
He’s consistent. He attacked Bush’s approach all through the election campaign as abandoning the war in Afghanistan and not containing the people who attacked America on 9/11.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 24, 2009 3:44:30 PM
_____________________
Okay, I’ll revise my opinion then..he’s consistently a small, petty man.
Posted by: Jen | November 24, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
We can’t do links here but google you tube obama afghan policy of the debate with John McCain….it’s UNbelievable…
He says that he will act swiftly and send more troops to win the war and indicates that Bush of course is to blame for not surging there…he is a LIAR.
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 24, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
“”"Anyone who watched his recent speeches in Japan and China knows the speeches remain strong and inspiring.”"”
Posted by: tierra
What? Oh, maybe I should ignore the media reports of very little being done on his trip over there. If all we want is great speeches, he could do that via satellite and stay here. I took 3 speech courses in college and in 2 of them you tape your speech and then watch them in fast forward to see patterns. EVERY single Obama speech, when fast forwarded, looks like he is waving his head side to side as if he is saying no. Check it out sometime.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 24, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Rick McDaniel stated…”He doesn’t have the stomach for what he would have to do, to finish the job.” – I guess you’d like to just nuke the whole country, right tough guy? You Obama haters are PATHETIC!
Posted by: Gerald | November 24, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
“”"Obama does both ‘think and act’ without discrediting Bush – almost all the time.”"”"
Posted by: tierra
Several international speeches showed discredit to the previous administration. Will your honeymoon with this man ever end?
Posted by: lfrichar | November 24, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Obama….
The constant lying.
The childish whining.
The disgraceful bowing.
The staggering arrogance.
The poisonous radicalism.
The dangerous narcissism.
The astounding incompetence.
Obama wants to put as much of the private economy under government control as possible to create his nanny state utopia where he is the boy king.
Let’s continue to stand strong against Obama in every way and get Congress out of the hands of the insane Pelosi and Reid in 2010.
Obama is a smug, smirking con man. Nothing more.
Posted by: jackson | November 24, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
He not only has the stomach but the brains to do the job.While all of you are whinning about the time he took, did you forget Bush took one year to respond to requests for more men and he did not send enough and walked away from Afghanistan and concentrated on Iraq where we did not need to be nor did we need to send our soldiers to die there. You all have short memories or memories of convenience.
As for Mc Crystal, he was the one involved in the Pat Tillman debaucle where he claimed he died a hero to the family while he was killed by friendly fire. His parents persisted and he had to back down and apologize so he is no star either.I know navy men and army men who say he broke protocall by the way he made his request to the public first and then the President.
Posted by: talmag | November 24, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
“It is in our strategic interests, in our national security interests, to make sure that Al Qaida and its extremist allies cannot operate effectively”
If that is the case, then why would his administration choose to broadcast our country’s intelligence capabilities to the public via the upcoming KSM trial?
As he is the president, I want to believe him, but his track record does not give me confidence that he will put the countries best interests first.
Posted by: Peter | November 24, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“”"he broke protocall by the way he made his request to the public first and then the President.”"”
Posted by: talmag
1st, I was upset when the President and Gates fired the other General and put this guy in, but he is a General and they made that decision. I have not seen any media interviews where he actually broke protocol (I am a 20+ year retiree. I have seen interviews, but he didn’t discuss anything that would be considered breaking protocol. If he did, Obama siad ANY leaks would result in termination, so I think he’s OK with protocol. My problem is Obama picked McChrystal for this assessment and it’s been 3 months. Obama stated in May he had a strategy, which tells me that was a lie.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 24, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
An Obama promise means that he’ll do the exact opposite of what he promises. So when he says he supports the Afganistan War, he really means “the U.S. Forces only fly over Afganistan and drop bombs killing innocent women and children”..as he said in August 2007…did he ever apologize forthat comment? NO.
Posted by: Peter King | November 24, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
CND FOX, tierra, BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Posted by: JamesJ | November 24, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
If all we want is great speeches, he could do that via satellite and stay here.
Posted by: lfrichar |
He goes to China and does a televised town hall with hand selected Chinese “students” and the Hu makes it virtually impossible for a Chinese citizen to see it.
Does this mean that the Chinese have the same opinion about Obama talking to school children as the “loony” right?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | November 24, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
See James Fallows of Atlantic Monthly. It’s no secret that the WH press doesn’t dig particularly deep.
Posted by: @Octavia
Wow! So what significant events happened over there?
Posted by: lfrichar | November 24, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Obama is mentally ill with a severe form of narcissism.
The best thing in the world is to ratchet up the criticism of him. And things like SNL ridiculing him and the Olympic slap in the face are extremely helpful.
Obama will destroy this nation to preserve his ego. Dems MUST go in 2010 if this nation is to survive the destruction of Obama and the spoiled children, Marxists and anti-American hacks throughout his administration.
Posted by: Larreau | November 24, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
“He not only has the stomach but the brains to do the job”-pray tell what evidence is there since his election to confirm that?He didn’t remember meeting his brother,he didn’t know the difference between the Medal of Honor and the Medal of Freedom,he keeps bowing to foreign leaders without recognizing the consequences,etc.He hasn’t had the stomach to see anything through since his inauguration that hasn’t been pushed by Pelosi or Reid.If he is so smart why isn’t he a Phi Beta Kappa?
Posted by: Nephron | November 24, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
“”"”The problem lies in your shallow assessment of what may or may not have been gained. We don’t know yet. Should we just the military on as shallow criteria? “”"”
Posted by: @Octavia
A gain would have been China agreeing to discuss possible sanctions on Iran. As it stands, China has said they are not interested. I don’t know what your second sentence is telling me, but it could be my shallow view on things. Why is it some people have to jab at others. 1st, you question my 20+ years and then call me shallow. Clearly, whether you admit it or not, this trip did not have ANY significant achievements short or long term. If it did, the Obama crazed media would have certainly front paged them by now. Instead, many have done just the opposite.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 24, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
He added that “it’s going to be important to recognize that, in order for us to succeed there, you’ve got to have a comprehensive strategy that includes civilian and diplomatic efforts.”
**********
His first hint at the “war tax”?
Posted by: wheresmymoney | November 24, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
“”"”Should we assess the military on as shallow criteria? No? Why not?”"”"
Posted by: @Octavia
It wasn’t enoough to show disrespect to one 20+ year retiree, now you want the whole of the military. You continue to say “shallow” criteria. Obama used this trip as an excuse to delay his decision on Afghanistan, as he “prepared” for this trip. I would have hoped to see more gains come from it. So, let’s hear your “assessment of our troops. Wadda ya got?
Posted by: lfrichar | November 24, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
So who did we declair war on?? “Finish the job.”?
Posted by: joe | November 24, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
wheresmymoney — If he is leaning towards a war tax, it would certainly hurt his “no taxes for those under $250K” speech.
Posted by: lfrichar | November 24, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
“Obama stated in May he had a strategy, which tells me that was a lie.”
On March 27, 2009, President Obama, flanked by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, announced his new strategy toward the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Obama: “I want the American people to understand that we have a clear and focused goal…”
According to the BBC at the time:
“Mr. Obama has taken ownership of the Afghan war.”
“To achieve its goals, Mr Obama said, the US needed:
* A “stronger, smarter and more comprehensive strategy”
* Not to deny resources to Afghanistan because of existing commitments to Iraq – and here international help was needed
* To recognise the connection between the future prospects of Afghanistan and Pakistan”
Apparently, he’s been stammering and dithering since MARCH. He seems a little unclear and unfocused…
Posted by: Krakatoa | November 24, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
ifrichar, I’m sorry that another person on this blog would insult your service claiming a “win spin culture of the military”.The culture of the military is to carry out the orders of the Commander-in-Chief to the best of its ability.It is often a thankless job; I remember the disgusting treatment of Vietnam vets by people with the political orientation of some of the contributors to this blog.I salute your service.
Posted by: Nephron | November 24, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
It would be logical to assume that if any significant achievments occured the White House and the President’s political allies would be promoting them.
Posted by: Nephron | November 24, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Lets see- The Bush strategy – Standing Turkey shoot -War of attrition– Undefined Mission – Inadequate troops, Inadequate armour.
8 years in — no end in sight – no victory in sight !!! WW11 took less than half that time—–2009 Obama takes over- sends 23,000 additional troops then calls for a complete review of the War.What would you do?
Posted by: brian | November 24, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
How about looking for a victory.
________________________________
Throughout the centuries many peoples have looked for a ‘victory’ in Afghanistan including the second largest military force in the world at that time – the U.S.S.R.
It’s a lot easier said than done. And it may be impossible given the immense size of the country, the terrain and the culture.
The American and NATO troops are seen as ‘invaders’ by many, many Afghanis.
Posted by: tierra | November 24, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
If I had my way I would ship all the Democrat’s that called our troops murders during the Iraq war to fight the war in Afghanistan and send Obama to the front lines for his demonizing our troops in Iraq while Bush was in office. You idiot Democrat’s our troops are the same men and women that fought and died in Iraq. Afghanistan is the same war as the terrorist are the same as they were in Iraq.
Posted by: John Demeter | November 24, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
“It’s my intention to finish the job.” Gee, sounds like a George W. quote to me?
Posted by: Todd | November 24, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
If I had my way I would ship all the Democrat’s that called our troops murders during the Iraq war to fight the war in Afghanistan and send Obama to the front lines for his demonizing our troops in Iraq while Bush was in office.
______________________________________
I don’t know anybody who demonized the troops in Iraq. I know people who thought Bush and Cheney’s decision to attack was an atrocity . ..
Posted by: tierra | November 24, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Empty words from an empty man.
Posted by: NEVER vote dem again | November 24, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Gee, that reminds me of LBJ in 1965! Doesn’t anyone ever learn from our mistakes?
Posted by: JonF | November 24, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Empty words from an empty man.
__________________________________
An empty comment . . .
Posted by: tierra | November 24, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
OBL must be shaking in his boots. Now we have a real man in the WH, itching to prove his meddle. Unlike that slacker G.W. Bush, he’ll finish the job. Should be quite a speech on Tuesday. He’ll not only lay out a comprehensive war plan, soup to nuts, but justify continuing the battle to the American people.
Quite a high standard for the President to meet… I can’t wait.
Posted by: Terry | November 24, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
“Slacker G.W.Bush”-as I recall Lt. Bush flew supersonic jets-not an easy feat.What is Mr. Obama’s military experience besides having an uncle “who liberated Auschwitz”? Playing with toy soldiers?
Posted by: Nephron | November 24, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
“What would you do? ”
Act immediately to deploy the number of troops requested by the military commanders, make maximum effort to defeat the enemy, then figure out an exit strategy.
Posted by: Sigmonde | November 24, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Tuesday will be President Obama’s first presidential Q&A press conference in 5 months.
What’s the longest GWB went without holding a press conference?
thanks, SAE
Posted by: SAE | November 24, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Obama has shown he can’t handle the job. He has taken the MR. Nice Guy approqach and has made no progress anywhere in the world while groveling and bowing across the world. When you look at WWII and the actions of FDR, that was a President who had the backbone to lead us. Obama doesn’t have it and our countries reputation is suffering. Being liked is more important to Obama than doing the tough job.
Posted by: jschmidt | November 24, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
“Slacker G.W.Bush”-as I recall Lt. Bush flew supersonic jets—
——————————-
Surely we can’t compare sitting alert to defend the Continental US from attack, blasting out into the dark night at least once per alert tour, not knowing if it was an exercise or real scramble until hand-off to weapons control, in a single-engine well-known widow-maker, carrying a nuclear tipped missile, subject to an order to ram any bombers the might escape, and knowing all the while that a flame-out would mean a long swim in the gulf, in any way compares to being editor of the Harvard Law review. Just imagine the criticism of your editorial decisions from your fellow students! The stress!
Posted by: Terry | November 24, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Remember that major played by John Larroquette in the movie ‘Stripes’?
Posted by: LongT | November 24, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
LongT,ever been on a Board of Inquiry for a military airplane crash?Do you know what’s left after a military plane crash? Ever gotten seasick off Point Loma while waiting for the divers to bring up the bodies of aviators? Don’t ever compare military aviators to clowns.
Posted by: Nephron | November 24, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Regarding President Obama’s heroism . ..
Too bad neither Bush or Cheney served in Vietnam. And Bush especially since the government spent so much money training him as a pilot and then he failed to show for his physical and was grounded, and requested and received ground duty so he could work on an election campaign.
Posted by: tierra | November 25, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Obama’s delays and ditherings has shown weakness to the enemies, and has shown the people in Afghanistan that America may not stay the course. Obama was given many, many briefings on Afghanistan prior to even entering office. His delays against his proven Generals request has emboldened the enemies of America, and probally responsible for the death and injuries of numerous American soldiers in Afghanistan. Obama has never worked a real job, ran a real business, and never served his countries military. His Senate career was mostly about NOT voting for, or against, anything. I am disgusted with the far left lies, and their Marxism. Obama is running the Afghanistan war in the manner the Vietnam war was run. History repeats itself…… Just wait for the next energy crisis. The U.S. is now producing even less domestic oil, thanks to Obama and his Marxist friends pulling oil leases, shutting down offshore drilling sites, refusing to issue nuclear permits, and basically laying waste to the private sector. Your taxes are going up, up, up. In 2010 Obama will raise your taxes by allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire. I wasn’t happy with some of the things Bush did, but compared to Obama….Bush wins my accolades 10 fold.
Posted by: jon | November 25, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Obama’s delays and ditherings has shown weakness to the enemies, and has shown the people in Afghanistan that America may not stay the course.
__________________________________
Not nearly as much as Bush and Cheney!
They dithering on Afghanistan for 7 years – putting it on the back burner to simmer while al Qaeda and the Taliban regrouped and gained strength – with serious consequences for our troops and the people of Afghanistan.
Posted by: tierra | November 25, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
This stagecraft of Obama is sickening. Stretching out the whole thing for so long and then finally LEAKING. What an idiot that man is.
Posted by: tanarg | November 25, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Obama isn’t a Marxist! That would require that he have a coherent political philosophy. Instead he is the ultimate flim-flam man who has pulled the wool over America’s eyes once too often.
He should be voted out in 2012, and we should realize that if someone comes onto the scene talking too good to be true – then we are probably right and they are as full of crap as Obama is.
The only die-hard fans are the 20′s somethings that are looking for replacement for their parents in the US government. Boy are they on the wrong track!
Posted by: JonF | November 25, 2009, 5:15 am 5:15 am
“It is in our strategic interest, in our national security interest, to make sure that Al-Qaeda and its extremist allies cannot operate effectively in those areas,” he continued……………………………
Also We’re going to downsize government – cut costs – create new jobs – and balance our budget that won’t budge. Now Foolks with all the Good News Black Friday is coming up. Go out and Buy, Buy, Buy, and Spend, Borrow, and Charge Up all that you haul. You will make Your President, Congress, Geitner & China so very happy to know that our Bail-Outs & Tax cut Schemes for the Corporations, Banks, Wall Street, & Auto was the Right Thing to Do. We got bigger & better things planned JUST FOR YOU Next Year. HEALTHCARE for example! TRUST Me! Would I Lie?
Posted by: kiotikid | November 25, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Sure Obama. Navy Seals captured a terrorist leader and your administration is going to prosecute the seals for giving the terrorist a bloody lip while he was being captured IN COMBAT. This should prove to all AMERICANS you are not about protecting us but trying to open your arms to your people. The Muslim terrorists. Yes I said it cause I have had eneough.
Posted by: Jim Rod | November 25, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I wonder what Obama’s definition of “finish” is?????
Posted by: lfrichar | November 25, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
I promise you Obama sending thirty five thousand more troops to Afghanistan to preserve there right to grow poppies, which America is the leading nation, heroin users. American boys losing life and limb, its the only assets they have poppies. What else are we fighting for?
Afghanistan has twenty five million people and can’t find an army to protect themselves, means they don’t and never did want an army just War Lords.
Hatti has nothing so you don’t see America helping them they have nothing to offer the money makers of America, just Poverty and that has no monetary Value. If they had Oil Or Poppies we would be up to our necks in Hatti. They only have beggars and Dirt.
As long as we have war they can declare marshal law on the populous a great government tool to take away freedoms from the from the populous.
I for one can’t take I promise you to the bank for money or I solemnly swear to buy a home they want some down payment, plus interest, plus Assets.
I Sloemnly swear and I promise you makes a Liar out of any Man.
Posted by: thwatco | November 25, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Jim Rod, were you criticizing Bush the past 7 years as he cut-and-ran from Afghanistan? If not, go away, your criticism is as hollow as Cheney’s.
Posted by: Bucket of Cold Water | November 25, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Get a grip Propaganda is National and political bunk. From what is posted its the same old game its left or right’s fault think about whats right for you and it will be right for the Majority of the people. Politics is the Perk Kings in Washington’s game and the have us caught up in the wake, be a man think for yourselves, don’t try to make Opinions come True.
Posted by: thwatco | November 25, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
He cannot decide because he is wooried about his fund raising. We have kids over there fighting for this guy to sleep in peace here in America and he thanks them with nothing but words.
Posted by: Jim Rod | November 25, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Oh – Finish the job? Does that mean more military will be tried for giving the terrorists a bloody lip? OHHHH ABC is not reporting that story – sorry
Posted by: Enough Already | November 25, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
What an IDIOT he hasn;t finished one thing he has stared while in office, all he has done is have a blast blowing our hard earned dollars trying to make him look good and has failed at that—-what a moron!!!!!!!
Posted by: countrygirl_74 | November 25, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“were you criticizing Bush the past 7 years as he cut-and-ran from Afghanistan? If not, go away, your criticism is as hollow as Cheney’s.”-posted by Bucket of Cold Water
—
Here’s a little bucket of cold water for you. It doesn’t matter if someone did or did not approve of President Bush’s handling of Afghanistan.
This is the United States of America, where all citizens have the right to question, praise or criticize any elected official they want.
Just as those who did criticize President Bush, those who wish to criticize President Obama are equally free to do so.
I myself did not approve of President Bush neglecting the war in Afghanistan through much of his time in office. But I also approved of much that he did do. Al Queda no longer has open training bases there. I call that a success.
I will reserve judgement on President Obama’s plans until I hear them. If I don’t approve, I will make my views known.
If you don’t appreciate the freedoms all American citizens have, I’m sure you can find some two-bit, dictator-controlled country that will take you in.
Posted by: malcat | November 25, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Not nearly as much as Bush and Cheney!
They dithering on Afghanistan for 7 years – putting it on the back burner to simmer while al Qaeda and the Taliban regrouped and gained strength – with serious consequences for our troops and the people of Afghanistan.
————–
Why is it when someone complains about President Obama so many of his supporters come back with “….not as bad/much/etc as President Bush?
Seriously, is that the best we can say about President Obama….that ‘he’s not as bad as President Bush?
If that’s all, then we are in deep, deep, DEEP doo-doo!
I don’t want the current President to be constantly considered ‘not-as-bad-as’. I want every President to do the best he/she can.
I want them to live up to their campaign promises. I look at a political campaign as one heck of a long, tedious job interview. It’s time we Americans insisted that the people we ‘hire’ do the job and do it right.
I’s sick and tired of politicians lying through their smiles and then going back on everything they said.
I’m talking about all politicians. I don’t give a mule’s backside what party they belong to.
Posted by: malcat | November 25, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
tierra – “Not nearly as much as Bush and Cheney!
They dithering on Afghanistan for 7 years – putting it on the back burner to simmer while al Qaeda and the Taliban regrouped and gained strength – with serious consequences for our troops and the people of Afghanistan”–
Speaking a s military member who was in the persian gulf (Quatar), let me say that you are simply clueless in your comments. We never “Cut and run” from Afganistan – we have been engaged in that fight for several months longer than the conflict in Iraq. Afganistan is a dispersed ground war (sort of like flipping rocks to look for a scorpion) while Iraq was a more conventional conflict. During my stay in the persian gulf, there was as much imphasis placed on the ongoing Afgan war as there was in Irag, even at the height of the US drive to oust Sadam Hussain. If you haven’t notices, the taliban have NOT regrouped and gained strength since we went into Afganistan. In the decade preceeding 9/11, Al Quaida was responsible for no less than 7 major attacks.. since beginning the conflict in Afganistan they have not managed any additional acts of significance against civilian targets. I don’t consider that cutting and running. One note though, since the anauguration of Obama, The death toll of American troops in Afganistan has tripled. Wonder why that is??
Posted by: arkievet | November 25, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Malcat…here is a bucket of cold water right back at you and everyone who “has an attitude” like yours. Until American get more up to date and better educated on the key/prime issues that face our nation AND learn to think rationally with long term vision and goals in mind – they really should just keep their mouths shut. Knee jerk, emotional, reactionary responses to soundbites has resulted into a divisive, partisan political mess that keeps sound positive strategies from being enacted. The shallow thinkers of America – with the the loudest shrill voices – are our worst problem(s).
Posted by: CND FOX | November 25, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
The government is so concerned about this war in Afghanistan. But you know what I’m concerned about? I’m concerned about our soldiers, especially the ones who don’t come home at all and their loved ones.
http://ketiva.com/Politics_and_Government/obamas_ministers_argue_over_troop_reinforcements.html
I found this interesting though…
Posted by: billy37 | November 25, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
The U.S. is now producing even less domestic oil, thanks to Obama and his Marxist friends pulling oil leases, shutting down offshore drilling sites, refusing to issue nuclear permits, and basically laying waste to the private sector. Your taxes are going up, up, up. In 2010 Obama will raise your taxes by allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire. I wasn’t happy with some of the things Bush did, but compared to Obama….Bush wins my accolades 10 fold.
Posted by: mike | November 26, 2009, 6:11 am 6:11 am
The only die-hard fans are the 20′s somethings that are looking for replacement for their parents in the US government. Boy are they on the wrong track!
Posted by: direct quotes | November 26, 2009, 6:30 am 6:30 am