By Gorman Gorman

Nov 13, 2009 8:24am

The Din: Afghanistan Looms for Obama, but Palin Dominates Another News Cycle

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Think President Obama misses being on American soil?

Democrats, in November, are looking for new ideas to pay for health care… and Republicans are now warring over abortion, too… there’s rumblings inside the top levels of the administration… a major Gitmo announcement is coming Friday… we’re about to get in deeper in Afghanistan, but only if it brings us closer to the way out… George W. Bush wants smaller government…

But this is Sarah Palin’s world — and that’s really all we can see from our porches right now.

There may be no better example of the power and perils associated with the former governor of Alaska than what we’ll see over the next week.

There is precisely one superstar in the Republican Party — and she happens, by choice, not to hold elected office, or feel as if she owes much of anything to anyone in the party establishment. (And you thought tea parties might be dangerous?)

On this Friday the 13th, the Palin craze is starting a few days earlier than anticipated — with Oprah and an early copy of the book coming before the Barbara Walters interviews next week.

According to the AP, which got hold of a copy of “Going Rogue” a few days early, Palin writes she was “bottled up” by the McCain campaign, and decries the “jaded aura” of political operatives.

This breaks some china — and is specific enough for dispute: “She says that most of her legal bills were generated defending what she called frivolous ethics complaints, but she reveals that about $50,000 was a bill she received to pay for the McCain campaign vetting her for the VP nod,” the AP’s Richard T. Pienciak writes. “She said when she asked the McCain campaign if it would help her financially, she was told McCain’s camp would have paid all the bills if he’d won; since he lost, the vetting legal bills were her responsibility.”

And, cue: “To my knowledge, the campaign did not receive any bill from Gov. Palin for legal expenses connected to her vetting, nor did the campaign ask her to pay any vetting-related expenses,” Trevor Potter, a lawyer for the McCain presidential campaign, told USA Today’s Kathy Kiely.

Drudge has an excerpt from the section on Nicolle Wallace pushing for the Katie Couric interview: “She just has such low self-esteem,” Wallace is quoted as saying of Couric. “Katie [wants] people to like her… She wants you to like her.”

Writes Palin: “Hearing all that, I almost started to feel sorry for her. Katie had tried to make a bold move from lively morning gal to serious anchor, but the new assignment wasn’t going very well.”

ABC’s Kate Snow, on “Good Morning America” Friday: “Last year, she had a campaign bus; this year, the bus will be wrapped with the front cover of her new book. . . . It’s payback time.”

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos: “There’s no question that this book tour can put her in a position to run.”

Get set: “The rollout for former Alaska governor Sarah Palin’s highly anticipated and score-settling memoir began Thursday with all the orchestrated stagecraft, wild accusations, inconvenient leaks and media fascination that characterized her campaign as Sen. John McCain’s running mate during the 2008 presidential race,” Jason Horowitz and Michael D. Shear write in The Washington Post.

The responses from former McCain aides are mostly anonymous — so far: “John McCain offered her the opportunity of a lifetime, and during the campaign it seems that, for all of her mistakes, she is searching for people to blame,” said one former senior official in the McCain campaign. “We don’t need to go through this again.”

Another broadside, in Palin’s interview with Oprah, on the fallout from the Couric interview: “The campaign said, ‘Right on. Good. You’re showing your independence.  This is what America needs to see and it was a good interview,’ ” Palin said. “And of course I’m thinking, if you thought that was a good interview, I don’t know what a bad interview is, because I knew it wasn’t a good interview.”

(She goes easy on Levi Johnston, and Levi thinks he knows why: “She knows what I got on her. It’s a smart move on her part,” Johnston said Thursday, at the Fleshbot awards. Yes, it is what you think it is. You absolutely, positively, cannot make this stuff up.)

The president is in Japan Friday, and held a news conference with Prime Minister Hatoyama Friday morning.

On Afghanistan: “I don’t think this is a matter of some datum of information I’m waiting on,” the president said. “It is a matter of making certain that when I send the young men and women into war, and I devote billions of dollars of US taxpayer money, that it’s making us safer.”

And on the Gitmo announcement: “I’m absolutely convinced that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad will be subject to the most exacting demands of justice. The American people insist on it. My administration will insist on it.”

More on that front, per the AP: “An Obama administration official says accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be sent to New York to face trial in a civilian federal court. The official tells The Associated Press that Attorney General Eric Holder is scheduled to announce the decision later Friday morning.”

On the president’s agenda Friday, per ABC’s Sunlen Miller: “The White House says that it is likely the President and Prime Minister will discuss the controversial Futenma base issue, but did not anticipate an agreement coming out of their meetings today.”

Looming over everything is Afghanistan.

Getting out, as we get deeper in: “President Barack Obama is seeking an approach to eventually ending U.S. involvement in Afghanistan even as he weighs a possible expansion of the American military role in the conflict,” Bloomberg’s Edwin Chen and Viola Gienger write.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates: “How do we signal resolve and at the same time signal to the Afghans as well as to the American people that this isn’t an open-ended commitment?”

AP dispatch from Friday morning: “President Obama aimed Friday to shore up relations with a new Japanese government vowing to be more assertive with its U.S. ally, even as he grapples with sending more U.S. troops to Afghanistan.”

“The key sticking points appear to be timelines and mounting questions about the credibility of the Afghan government,” an administration official tells ABC’s Jake Tapper. “After years of substantial investments by the American people, governance in Afghanistan must improve in a reasonable period of time to ensure a successful transition to our Afghan partner.”

Anyone shocked that he’s after middle ground? “President Barack Obama wants to blend together elements of the different troop-increase options presented to him Wednesday to formulate a new strategy for the Afghan war, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday,” The Wall Street Journal’s Peter Spiegel writes.

What else Gates is saying, on all the leaks: “Everybody out there ought to just shut up,” he said, per ABC’s Kirit Radia.

What the president is saying: “We’ll give you the strategy and clear mission you deserve,” Obama said at his stop-off in Anchorage, per ABC’s Rachel Martin.

Casualties of the war over the war: “The Obama administration’s internal debate over Afghan policy has escalated into a battle of media leaks that’s straining relations between officials who’re seeking a major troop increase and those who want a more limited approach and a greater focus on domestic priorities,” McClatchy’s Jonathan S. Landay, Dion Nissenbaum and John Walcott report.

“The feud also has poisoned ties between the top U.S. military commander in Afghanistan and the U.S. ambassador in Kabul, and left the administration struggling for leverage to press Afghan President Hamid Karzai to appoint untainted officials to his new government, attack corruption and share power with the parliament and provincial officials.”

RNC scrambling, then action: “The chairman of the Republican National Committee announced late Thursday that he is unilaterally ending coverage of elective abortion u nder the RNC’s Cigna health-care plan,” per ABC’s Teddy Davis.

“Money from our loyal donors should not be used for this purpose,” said RNC Chair Michael Steele in a written statement. “I don’t know why this policy existed in the past, but it will not exist under my administration. Consider this issue settled.”

Per Politico’s Jonathan Allen and Meredith Shiner, who broke the story Thursday: “Federal Election Commission Records show the RNC purchases its insurance from Cigna, and two sales agents for the company said that the RNC’s policy covers elective abortion. As of Thursday, the RNC’s plan covers elective abortion — a procedure the party’s own platform calls ‘a fundamental assault on innocent human life.’ ”

On health care — liberal groups targeting Democrats, again: Health Care for America Now has new TV ads launching, in Nebraska and Arkansas. From the release going out Friday: “The ads customized for each state and titled ‘Debate’ will run for one week starting today in Fort Smith, Jonesboro, and Little Rock, Arkansas and in Lincoln and Omaha, Nebraska. The total advertising buy is approximately $310,000. The spot explains that while the nation has been discussing health care reform for months, it’s now time for the full Senate to begin its official debate.”

As first reported by the AP’s David Espo: “[Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid is apparently considering an increase in the Medicare payroll tax rate for workers with incomes of more than $250,000 a year, Senate aides said. One idea is to increase the tax rate by one-half of 1 percentage point, to 1.95 percent for high-income people, with an expectation that the government could raise $40 billion to $50 billion over 10 years,” Robert Pear reports in The New York Times.

W. speaks: “I went against my free-market instincts and approved a temporary government intervention to unfreeze the credit markets so that we could avoid a major global depression,” former President George W. Bush said at the unveiling of the George W. Bush Presidential Center at Southern Methodist University, per ABC’s Devin Dwyer and Evan Harris. They write: “And without mentioning President Obama by name the former President did have some rather pointed comments for the current Administration claiming that generally ‘history shows that the greater threat to prosperity is not too little government involvement, but too much.’ ”

“As the world recovers, we will face a temptation to replace the risk-and-reward model of the private sector with the blunt instruments of government spending and control,” Bush said, per Joseph Curl of the Washington Times.

More adieus: “The White House counsel, Gregory B. Craig, has told associates that he intends to step down from his post on Friday, putting to rest long-running speculation about whether he would remain as President Obama’s top lawyer,” Jeff Zeleny writes in The New York Times. “Mr. Craig had been at the center of controversial decisions over whether to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as well as revising administration policies on the interrogation and detention of prisoners. For months, questions have circulated inside the White House about his status, but an official said early Friday that Mr. Craig had made the decision to resign.”

ABC’s Jake Tapper: “Craig will be replaced by attorney Bob Bauer, who has served as President Obama’s private attorney. Bauer will start work in December, so as to help create a seamless transition.”

In Massachusetts, with few distinctions, some endorsements: “Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York, a Medford native, is endorsing City Year cofounder Alan Khazei,” per The Boston Globe’s Matt Viser. “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is set to endorse US Representative Michael E. Capuano, a coup for any challenger to [Martha] Coakley, who is seeking to become the first female US senator from Massachusetts.”

Boosting a 2012er — David Brooks really likes Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.: “If you wanted a Republican with the same general body type and athletic grace as Barack Obama, you’d pick Thune,” Brooks writes in his column. “Republicans are still going to have to do root-and-branch renovation if they hope to provide compelling answers to issues like middle-class economic anxiety. But in the meantime, people like Thune offer Republicans a way to connect fiscal discipline with traditional small-town values, a way to tap into rising populism in a manner that is optimistic, uplifting and nice.”

The Kicker:

“Are you tough enough to come here to Massachusetts … So Stephen, are you willing to come?” — Senate candidate Alan Khazei, D-Mass., in a challenge to Stephen Colbert — and looking for a way to get another debate.

“I wouldn’t say they’re making up numbers, but there are no standards or consistency.” –  Nevada Controller Kim Wallin, a Democrat, to the Las Vegas Sun, on how the stimulus is being tracked.

For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s blog . . . all day every day:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/

Intern for the ABC News Political Unit:

The ABC News Political Unit is now seeking full-time spring 2010 interns in Washington, D.C.

The paid internship begins Monday, Jan. 4, 2010, and runs through Friday, June 4, 2010.

Political Unit interns attend political events and contribute to stories for the politics page of ABCNews.com. They also help ABC News by conducting research, maintaining our calendar of upcoming political events, and posting stories to ABCNews.com.

In order to apply, you MUST be either a graduate student or an undergraduate student who has completed his or her first year of college. The internship is NOT open to recent graduates.

You also must be able to work eight hours per day, Monday through Friday. Interns will be paid $8.50/hour.

If you write well, follow politics closely, and have some familiarity with web publishing, send a cover letter and resume to Teddy Davis, ABC News’ Deputy Political Director, at teddy.davis@abc.com, by Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, with the subject line: “INTERN” in all caps.

Please indicate in both your cover letter and the body of your email your student status and the specific dates and hours of your availability.

User Comments

Sorry Palinites…..Sarah is a liar and is proving she will throw anyone & all integrity under the bus for a dollar.

Posted by: today | November 13, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

“There’s no question that this book tour can put her in a position to run.”
What planet does the media report from? The same planet that told us Balloon Boy’s trip was a major breaking story?
This isn’t about Sarah Palin anymore, I think she signalled she was done with elective office when she resigned from being governor of Alaska, this is about the …I don’t know, incompetence? of the national media which creates “stories” to drive up ratings. Do you guys know how much contempt Americans of all parties hold you in?

Posted by: Amy in Maine | November 13, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

create stories for Sarah Palin….didn’t have to…She gave us the stories..LOL and yes, she is irrelevant…I think “the media” and some of us just wants to have a little fun with the most self-centered, irresponsible, ill-equiped, ill-educated person in American politics…McCain should be ashamed of himself for putting us and her in this position. Settling scores Sarah, Grow-Up, and go home and continue your little life that has “only 5 chapters”. This is self-serving at best!

Posted by: sara | November 13, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

No, Rick. Palin does not “rule.” The only place I ever see her mentioned is on ABC. She may sell a lot of books, because people like you will read them, but she is the same clueless wingnut she always was.
Maybe you should look for news a little more outside your usual hyping grounds.

Posted by: jock59801 | November 13, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Palin is not nearly as bad as so many would like to make her out. But, she is not ready to be president.

Posted by: Shane | November 13, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Yes, Palin does rule, and no amount of media lashing can keep her down now. Just like no amount of media adulation towards BO can keep him up.
Should Palin choose to run in 2012, provided the liberal socialists have not completely destroyed our economy by then, she could overtake obama.
BO was elected on nothing more then speeches and slogans.
If unemployment continues to rise (which is likely considering that NOTHING he is doing is going to stimulate our economy), liberals could be in for some real change come 2012.

Posted by: Dave | November 13, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

No surprises here. We simply can’t stand seven more years of the last year.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | November 13, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Shane
What makes someone “qualified” to be the most powerful person in the world?
An ability to flawlessy read a teleprompter?
An ability to possess the most liberal voting record in the senate (even further to the left of an outspoken socialist senator from VT) and convince the electorate that you are a moderate?
An ability to be involved in a scandal to secure yourself a 2 milllion dollar mansion with a convicted slum-lord tony rezko (someone who was also your senate campaign organizer)?
Or an abililty to attend a black-liberation theology church that preached anti-American sentiment, only to have a fawning media allow you to justify your attendance there for 20 years because you “weren’t aware that those things were being said”?
BO is a liar and a socialist. He is an empty suit.
Palin fought corruption when she became governor on both sides of the aisle. She sold the private jet and fired the private jet. Those are enough “qualifications” for me. She is the only politician that I have seen in a loooooong time that really was for the people she served.

Posted by: Dave | November 13, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

No matter the topic, right wingnuts will somehow find a way of bring up President Obama in their comment.
That’s part of their Obama Derangement Syndrome (ODS)

Posted by: New Wave | November 13, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Personally, I think Sarah Palin (and those like her) scare the livin’ excre.ment out of the “establishment” in Washington, be they GOP or Democrat.
She’s not beholding to anyone, which means she doesn’t owe anyone, which means she says what she WANTS to say, not what the “machine” tell her to say – in contrast to the sophomore Senator-become-President who owes EVERYTHING to the senior members of his party (Pelosi, Reid, Clinton), and therefore bends to THEIR wishes, rather than “We the People.”
Yeah, Sarah may or may not have been the best choice for VP, but I’m GLAD to have those like her taking their shots at the office.
The last one I can recall was Ross Perot, and he elicited much the same worry from BOTH of the political parties that have hijacked our country.
It’s time for the INDEPENDENTS (the REAL majority in America) to take full control of the Office of the President of the United States (POTUS), AND both houses of Congress.
It starts in 354 days!!!

Posted by: Laughin_All_The_Way | November 13, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

“It’s time for the INDEPENDENTS (the REAL majority in America) to take full control of the Office of the President of the United States (POTUS), AND both houses of Congress.” -Laughin_All_The_Way
I take it that you and your cohorts have been asleep for the past decade.

Posted by: New Wave | November 13, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

New wave
Laughing all the way is 100% correct.
BO’s campaign somehow raised 800 million dollars (and then donated 1 million dollars to ACORN, but was “overlooked” by the media) and you don’t think he doesn’t owe people?
He owes the entire corrupt chicago, pay to play swamp, that he crawled out of.
Palin is beholden to NO ONE, and without the mismanagement of the mccain camp holding her back, she is going to become more powerful everyday.

Posted by: Dave | November 13, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

seroiusly, if Sarah palin is your best hope of a comeback…I won’t even have to campaign or donate for 12 to be in the bag…You are making this too easy…

Posted by: cowgirl | November 13, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Gov. Palin is the answer for America to regain it’s footing; domestically and internationally, as this “Man-Child” is running around the world looking for people to kiss his butt because he is the first Kenyan African to be president, even though that is all he’s done and will do..is be black. Obama is a complete disaster domestically and internationally. Obama has made the Inited States the laughing stock in the world. We need mature leadership back; and that will be Gov. Palin and Gov. Romney in 2012.

Posted by: Peter Smith | November 13, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

I am happy to be called anything but a republican…whos brand now represents, the most ignorant, undereducated, paranoid, and never marriesd outside the “family”…you people need some new Genes in that pool…

Posted by: cowgirl | November 13, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Sarah Palin-is the answer to the question…how much worse could it be after George Bush????

Posted by: cowgirl | November 13, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

gary – Gee, I’m sure glad that everyone ELSE is happy that the most powerful nation on the planet has joined the ranks of the impoverished. I’m more than SURE that they’re happy with our choice of [sic] “leadership.
BTW, since when do we judge the competency of OUR President by the opinions held by foreigners?
Maybe in 2012, we can just count THEIR votes, and ignore those of Americans. That should REALLY make them happy… and whatever’s good for THEM is obviously good for us, right?

Posted by: Laughin_All_The_Way | November 13, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Yawn….Next right wing rant(s) please

Posted by: New Wave | November 13, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

We were already impoverished by the $5 trillion in debt that Bush II left us, the $1.4 trillion his dad left us, and the $3 trillion that Reagan left us. That’s about 90% of the entire national debt racked up by three Republicans.

Posted by: gary | November 13, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

New Wave – Just for clarification… is the “right wing” anyone who sits to the right of Obama, or who sits to the right of home plate?
I mean, in a baseball stadium, sitting to the right of Obama could be ANYONE who is sitting left of the nose-bleed section of the right field bleachers, well before you get back to the seats behind home plate (e.g., center), and LONG before you start heading towards the right field bleachers.

Posted by: Laughin_All_The_Way | November 13, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

zzzzzzzzzzzzz…let us know when Palin makes it to the White House…okay?

Posted by: New Wave | November 13, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

gary – How many of those checks had CLINTON’S name on them? For that matter, how many had ANY president’s name on them?
Answer: NONE! Congress spends money, not the Executive Branch.
How many of those checks were co-signed by Obama? Oops!!!

Posted by: Laughin_All_The_Way | November 13, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

gary – Damned!! ANd it was such a sweet sound bite passed out by the left wingnuts…. Oh well. Back to the Kool-aid trough….

Posted by: Laughin_All_The_Way | November 13, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

The budget process starts with the President submitting one to Congress.
The president can then veto any budget that Congress passes, like in 1995 for example, when Clinton vetoed the Republican passed budget three times before they passed one he liked.
Why would Clinton’s name be on budgets signed into law by Republican presidents?
Clinton also ran four surpluses in a row, but you probably already knew that.

Posted by: gary | November 13, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

geez, the last one who dominated the news cycle like this was….Anna Nichol smith….same appeal as far as I can see…maybe she could run as palins sidekick…lets face it, the republican party has no talent intellect or ideas and just appeals to the lowest common denominator

Posted by: cowgirl | November 13, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

The same people who lamented that Sonia Sotomayor is not qualified to be an SCJ are claiming that Palin can be President of the US.
What gives?

Posted by: New Wave | November 13, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

This is one of Sarah Palin’s recent speeches, and I agree with her.
“I do not know what you choose, but as for me, I choose freedom. My freedom is being traded or all kinds of causes: for health care reform, for campaign finance reform, for immigration reform, for global warming/climate change, for bailouts of the government and their Wall Street pals, for banking reform, and even for partisan gain by Democrats and Republicans, “liberals”
and “conservatives”, and for lots of other causes and reforms. NONE of these causes or reforms is equal in value to my freedom and my freedom, which I own inherently, is beyond the jurisdiction of political parties, governments or corporations. I love peace, I love my country, I believe in a civil society, I believe in open and fair public debate, and I believe in the democratic process. I value my freedom more than life itself, for freedom is the greatest gift I can pass on to my progeny, against which all other promises are pale and meaningless. I am sovereign and free and this has not one thing to do with any human document or law or earthly power, I own this freedom and if I choose to submit to practices that make me less free I choose a path of self-destruction and I choose to betray my sacred obligation to my family, my nation and to my progeny. I choose to live in freedom from fear. Fear is a mind killer; it is the handmaiden of slavery: it is better to be bold and perish than to live on in fear. I fear only God. The cause of freedom is not a calculation of probabilities, it is a matter of principle, it is not a matter of what may or may not succeed but what is or is not right, proper, and necessary.
I fear neither failure nor death itself, I hope in my God and I obey my conscience towards my nation and my progeny. To stand for freedom, come what may, is itself a reward and if all I receive is the honor of having stood, even if at the cost of my very life or all I hold dear in this life, I have received enough for any man in this life to be content with…

Posted by: John Austin | November 13, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

In a bold move, Sarah Palin has silenced her Critics by resigning her position as Governor of Alaska. (She saved much money for Alaskan Citizens). This may actually be a convincing moment in the History of American Politics. As a Freedom Person, she will be able to receive $50,000 to $100,000 per speech and with her new book, Sarah will be worth $$$. Sarah deserves this Money…She did it on her own without help from Election Contributions. How many other Politicians could say this?
What is Sarah doing? (Running for President. That is why Sarah wrote her new book. Sarah is ½ Billion Dollars in debt to her Attorneys…just to prove her innocence concerning Morals). Sarah needs the $$$ to achieve the run for President in 2012. Sarah Palin is Libertarian. God Bless Her!
She compares her decision to a Basketball Player who passes the Ball to a Teammate for the good of the Team. It is rather like a double reverse Hand-off in Football. Sarah plans to start an Organization for Children until the 2010 Elections, fight for good Candidates to get elected in 2010…and she will get the…
“Ball back”. She also wants to start a Grassroots Movement for a 3rd Party…Libertarian. Sarah calls it the “American Party” or “Liberty Party”. (Conservative, Constitutional).

Posted by: John Austin | November 13, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Obviously, libs would rather focus on Palin bashing and avoid facing the painful ineptitude of Obama’s War.

Posted by: keys2truth | November 13, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

It would appear that all the ‘common folk’ that are being insulted and denigrated by spin doctors and elitist are rallying behind her. Too bad the elitist and dependents of the ‘Daddy’ state have forgotten who’s back their easy living is riding on.

Posted by: TX_MBell | November 13, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

John Austin
What the heck is she talking about? Healthcare reform endangers her freedom? Say what? Truly, I read your whole post quoting Mrs. Palin’s speech and it makes absolutely no sense to me.
Truly, I wish I knew where you were coming from, honestly I cannot understand how your freedom could be compromised by having healthcare.

Posted by: Amy in Maine | November 13, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

REmarkale, you have KSM coming to NYC, for the mother of all circus, with likely severe consequences for the city, you have a President who can’t make up his mind, about a war he said
he supported, a health care plan, than relies on honorous taxes and jail time
for those who can’t comply. A stimulus
that hasn’t worked for the stated purposes yet Sarah Palin is the dumb one

Posted by: ian cormac | November 13, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Sarah Palin is a breath of fresh air. She is honest, sincere and scares the living daylights out of the liberals. Even more importantly, she knows what a budget is and how to balance one – something Obama can’t seem to grasp. The liberal media attacks on Palin were sickening. Just because she lived in a different environment, just because her speech reflected a bit of regional dialect, just because she didn’t fit in with the status quo of stuffy lying politicians, it didn’t mean that she wasn’t skilled enough to be VP. Look at what we’ve got as President. A man with NO experience, a man who pulled off the biggest bait and switch scam ever and has nearly brought our great country to its knees. We are losing our liberties yet he’s worried about giving constitutional rights to terrorists! I hope Palin runs for office and I’ll be first in line to vote for her.

Posted by: grannysunni | November 13, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

>>>Truly, I wish I knew where you were coming from, honestly I cannot understand how your freedom could be compromised by having healthcare.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | Nov 13, 2009 5:04:01 PM<<<
Amy in Maine – your freedom of choice will be compromised by the health care reform. If you choose to not purchase health insurance you will face penalities. You'll be charged fines and possibly be sent to prison. The government will force you to comply or else… Many people over the years gave their lives for the sake of our country, to uphold our freedoms, to help us have a better country, a better life. And with one fell swoop, this administration will erase all of that.

Posted by: grannysunni | November 13, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

“she knows what a budget is and how to balance one”
It isn’t that hard to balance a budget that gets 80% of its revenue from oil taxes when oil is over $100 a barrel during your term.

Posted by: gary | November 13, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

If Palin is elected as President, the whole world would laugh at the United States, period.

Posted by: joy | November 13, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

grannysunni
Do you have a driver’s license? Do you own a car? Is it registered? Do you have collision insurance? (Because if you operate a car without a license, drive an unregistered vehicle or don’t have car insurance, you are breaking the law.) Living in society means following the law, to the extent it doesn’t violate your freedom of speech, to assembly, to practice your religion. A law requiring people who earn money to pay SOMETHING towards health insurance makes sense, considering our health care system is NOT FREE. Even if you currently do not have insurance, if you get sick I pay for your health care. I don’t wanna pay for your care. Get insurance.

Posted by: Amy | November 14, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.