By Jaketapper

Nov 13, 2009 4:45am

The Presidential Planner Abroad (While You Were Sleeping)

ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports: President Obama landed Friday afternoon in Tokyo and has a busy agenda after an overnight flight. Mr. Obama and Prime Minister Hatoyama of Japan will hold a bilateral meeting and an expanded bilateral meeting at the Kantei, the principal workplace of the Prime Minister of Japan. This is the second in-person meeting for the two leaders, following their sitdown at the United Nations General Assembly in September. "The President will first thank them for their renewed commitment to Afghanistan," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said teeing up todays meeting, "They'll talk about the international economy, climate change, as well as North Korea and non-proliferation." The White House says that it is likely the President and Prime Minister will discuss the controversial Futenma base issue, but did not anticipate an agreement coming out of their meetings today.  As part of a 1996 pact, aiming to reduce the US military presence in Japan, the US and Japan agreed to relocate the Futenma Air Base in Ginowon city within seven years. The plan for an off-shore facility in Northern Okinowa has been met with resistence from environmentalists and local residents, who just this week turned out to protest the move in advance of Obama's visit. "I think that there has been progress on the specific basing issue of Futenma which I’d hasten to point out is one operational subset of a huge, healthy and very complicated alliance relationship," a senior administration official said today, "I realize that that subset issue gets a great deal of attention in Japan but what I was alluding to is a more substantive process where by at a political level our two governments can explore how the US-Japan alliance which has flourished over the course of 50 difficult years can be revitalized and can be adapted to meet the challenges that we face now and can reasonably expect in the future." The two leaders will then hold a joint press conference and afterward have a private dinner. The President will spend the night in Tokyo. — Sunlen Miller

User Comments

Okinawa.

Posted by: kelli | November 13, 2009, 5:43 am 5:43 am

Jake:
Most Americans dont sleep like they used to. Insomnia brought to us by the commander in chief.

Posted by: mjishernameo | November 13, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Obama used that exit strategy Gibbs spoke of.
Obama exited to Asia.

Posted by: drjohn | November 13, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

“They’ll talk about the international economy, climate change, as well as North Korea and non-proliferation.”
Global warming, not climate change.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

The public has seen it, and the public is appalled:
“PRINCETON, NJ — More Americans now say it is not the federal government’s responsibility to make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage (50%) than say it is (47%). This is a first since Gallup began tracking this question, and a significant shift from as recently as three years ago, when two-thirds said ensuring healthcare coverage was the government’s responsibility.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 13, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Obama still doesn’t seem to grasp that the collective Election Night reverie is over, and that now we are waiting for him to lead us in real time. Sure, a little bit of hubris was probably inevitable, but it led Obama to conclude, despite what he said back then, that the historic election had been about him. When in the end, as always, it was about us.
That night began to reveal an unfortunate truth: having reached a pinnacle on the day he was elected, Obama’s popularity and relationship with the American people had nowhere to go but down. That’s a difficult adjustment to make, and is reminiscent of the apocryphal story about the obsessed fan and her friends who worshipped and followed the Rolling Stones. One night, the fan finally got to spend the evening with Mick Jagger. After she emerged from the hotel the next morning, her friends asked her how it went.
“Well,” she said, “he was alright. But he’s no Mick Jagger.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 13, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Could the President please apologize to Japan for all of the nasty things America did to them in WW2?
Or, apologize for thrusting upon them a free, democratic, capitalist society?

Posted by: J House | November 13, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Ms. Miller,
We can all agree they may have talked about ‘climate change’…do you mean the weather?
climate change= weather
global warming= Al Gore’s religion

Posted by: J House | November 13, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Could the President please apologize to Japan for all of the nasty things America did to them in WW2?
__________________________________
Did you know that before the two atomic bombs were dropped on civilian cities, the United States fire bombed 67 cities in Japan – cities the size of Cleveland, Miami, Baltimore, Fort Worth . .. 67 cities mostly with wood construction?
Typically at least 1/4 of the city (often well over 50%) was destroyed. This literally burned to death hundreds of thousands of civilians.
We’re talking about the intentional burning to death of hundreds of thousands of civilians.
Former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s comment on the bombing was this: (General Curtis) LeMay said that “If we’d lost the war, we’d all have been prosecuted as war criminals.” “And I think he’s right,” says McNamara. “He, and I’d say I, were behaving as war criminals.” . . . ”
I know, it’s old history – 2nd world war – but is part of the history of the United States.

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Global warming and the effects of man-made greenhouse gases . . .
These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.
But what would they know, compared to say . .. anonymous posters on a blog?

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Did you know
Posted by: tierra | Nov 13, 2009 11:41:17 AM
Yes. You said it yesterday.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 13, 2009 11:48:13 AM
Glad I was able to provide you with some historical context to go along with your political bias.

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Global warming and the effects of man-made greenhouse gases . . .
These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.
But what would they know, compared to say . .. anonymous posters on a blog?
Posted by: tierra | Nov 13, 2009 11:47:35 AM
I can’t contradict what scientists say, but I can google “scientists question global warming” and read.
Who knows what the real truth is. There certainly is plenty of controversy to pass around. I can only do my best in my tiny little sphere of influence and for now that’s good enough for me.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Glad I was able to provide you with some historical context to go along with your political bias.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 13, 2009 12:03:33 PM
It was context I didn’t know about, so in that sense I appreciate you bringing it up.
However, I never made a political statement about it either way. That was someone else.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

“I can’t contradict what scientists say, but I can google “scientists question global warming” and read. ”
You can google and read about alot of things on the internet.
It does not make them true.
For example:
TP: “The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) — a front group of big utilities and coal companies — is no stranger to fraud. During the summer’s House debate on cap-and-trade legislation, lobbyists working on behalf of the coal group sent forged letters to members of Congress, and lied under oath about it. Now, ACCCE is trying to exploit Veterans Day by misrepresenting veterans groups in an email to supporters:
With Veterans Day around the corner, we wanted to take a moment to reflect on all the military personnel who are involved in ensuring our country is protected.
Energy security is one issue that has become increasingly important to our veterans. In fact, national veterans groups Votevets and Operation Free are urging the government to become more energy independent and less reliant on foreign oil.
We can do this by using the abundant domestic fuels we already have. With more than 250 billion tons of recoverable coal reserves, the United States has more coal than the Middle East has oil.
The letter implies that VoteVets and Operation Free support ACCCE and its dirty energy agenda, but the the two groups are actually vocal backers of clean energy legislation. VoteVets excoriated ACCCE for citing them in the email, writing that VoteVets “will never advocate the continued use of carbon based fuels” and that ACCCE is trying “to hijack America’s Veterans” in “an act of despicable hubris.””

Posted by: Ryan C | November 13, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Tierra, I don’t need a history lesson from you.
Of course we firebombed Japan, as we did Germany.
Do you know what the Japanese did to the Chinese in Nanjing, before the war?
Or what they did to Malaysian and Singaporeans under their occupation, etc?
What is your point?
My question is, should the President apologize to Japan for US actions in WW2?

Posted by: J House | November 13, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Fascist Hyena is at it again. The entire comment posted Nov 13, 2009 10:38:42 AM is actually taken from Steven Stark’s blog at the Boston Phoenix.

Posted by: WWW | November 13, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

BTW, Tierra,
I’m commenting from KL, in Malaysia…you know, one of the countries OCCUPIED by the imperial Japanese in WW2.
My Malaysian Chinese wife’s grandmother watched as Japanese troops humiliated, beat and killed the locals.
But, as you say, we should all feel bad about the means in which we brought it all to an END.
There are many people in this world that cannot understand your minset…especially those that suffered under brutal oppression like my wife’s grandmother.

Posted by: J House | November 13, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Tierra, I don’t need a history lesson from you.
____________________________________
Surely, you’re not saying the firebombing to death of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians by the United States was a noble thing?
We get so haughty and self-righteous about Hussein using chemical weapons and killing about 10,000 people (during war) – and we used chemical weapons (napalm) to exterminate hundreds of thousands of civilians and injure thousands upon thousands more?

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

“Fascist Hyena is at it again. The entire comment posted Nov 13, 2009 10:38:42 AM is actually taken from Steven Stark’s blog at the Boston Phoenix.”
He really is a dishonest right winger, stealing other people’s work is low.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 13, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Tierra,
You are making it up as you go along.
It is you who uses the word ‘nobility’ to describe war. it is a dirty business…we finished it, and we didn’t start WW2.(are you in 4th grade? Don’t they still teach the facts about history?)
And if you knew anything about chemical weapons and international law, you would know napalm isn’t one of them.
Besides, the incendiaries used on Japan and Germany were phosphorous-based, primarily.You are clueless.
Who is being ‘haughty and self-righteous’ about Hussien’s use of poison gas on the Kurds?
Surely you are not saying that was a good thing, or inconsequential.
Let me ask you, just so we know your mindset-
Was the Hasan attack a terrorist attack?
If a man stands up in a room full of soldiers and shouts ‘Allah Akhbar’, then murders them by whatever means, is he an Islamic terrorist?

Posted by: J House | November 13, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Moral equivalency. Turning the other cheek. Seeking justice. Disguising revenge under the cloak of justice. Corporate vs. individual responsibility. All very tough subjects.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“I can’t contradict what scientists say, but I can google “scientists question global warming” and read. ”
You can google and read about alot of things on the internet. It does not make them true.

Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 13, 2009 12:46:17 PM
Agreed. And the keywords I used lead you to scientific opinions questioning global warming.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Tierra,
I guess you fail to understand some fundamental facts about WW2-
You see, they were trying to kill us and take over territory in many countries. We responded.
If they had had the atomic bomb and the means to turn our cities into ashes, believe me, THEY WOULD HAVE DONE IT.
Our system of govt, the productivity of our nation, our resources and our technology and most important, OUR WILL, won out against tyranny.
As it did in Saddam’s Iraq.

Posted by: J House | November 13, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

You see, they were trying to kill us and take over territory in many countries. We responded.
Posted by: J House | Nov 13, 2009 2:10:54 PM
You do understand the concept of war crimes right J House?
Like Saddam Hussein killing about 10,000 people with chemicals during the Iraq/Iran war was a hideous war crime right?
And you know that the United States firebombed hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians to death with napalm?

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Were charges ever brought? Was there a trial? Was there a conviction?
Or are you just condemning someone because you ‘know’?
Posted by: tierra | Nov 13, 2009 11:59:26 AM
To my knowledge, the United States was never charged, tried or convicted of war crimes against Japan – much like Greg Craig.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

To my knowledge, the United States was never charged, tried or convicted of war crimes against Japan – much like Greg Craig.
___________________________________
Not only that, an hour ago you didn’t even know this had taken place during WWII. That’s how tightly scripted the bogus, ‘we’re clean – everybody else is evil’ lie is maintained.
And of course . .. shhhhhhh!
Never admit to any faults, and if you do surely never apologize, or offer a honest look in retrospect – maintain your image that ‘we are perfect, we are the only decent folk on the planet, it’s them that are evil, we are the best . . .rah, rah, rah . .. etc’.
Great way to understand the world and its complexities. Great way to get people to really like you.

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

To my knowledge, the United States was never charged, tried or convicted of war crimes against Japan – much like Greg Craig.
________________________________
McNamara confessed.

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

To my knowledge, the United States was never charged, tried or convicted of war crimes against Japan – much like Greg Craig.
________________________________
McNamara confessed.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 13, 2009 7:04:11 PM
Try to follow the bouncing ball, tierra. McNamara was Vietnam, not WWII.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Never admit to any faults, and if you do surely never apologize, or offer a honest look in retrospect – maintain your image that ‘we are perfect, we are the only decent folk on the planet, it’s them that are evil, we are the best . . .rah, rah, rah . .. etc’.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 13, 2009 7:02:35 PM
Your dissatisfaction of our country and hero worship of Obama as a world citizen is obvious. But it clouds your judgement.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Great way to understand the world and its complexities.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 13, 2009 7:02:35 PM
“Special Japanese military units conducted experiments on civilians and POWs in China. One of the most infamous was Unit 731 under Shirō Ishii. Victims were subjected to vivisection without anesthesia, amputations, and were used to test biological weapons, among other experiments. Anesthesia was not used because it was believed to affect results.
“To determine the treatment of frostbite, prisoners were taken outside in freezing weather and left with exposed arms, periodically drenched with water until frozen solid. The arm was later amputated; the doctor would repeat the process on the victim’s upper arm to the shoulder. After both arms were gone, the doctors moved on to the legs until only a head and torso remained. The victim was then used for plague and pathogens experiments.” -Wiki

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Try to follow the bouncing ball, tierra. McNamara was Vietnam, not WWII.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 13, 2009 10:15:43 PM
_________________________________
Whipped Peas your lack of knowledge (and apparent inability to do proper research) makes it very difficult to have a sensible conversation.
McNamara was both.
He entered the Armed Forces as a captain in early 1943, serving most of the war with the AAF’s Office of Statistical Control. One major responsibility was the analysis of U.S. bombers’ efficiency and effectiveness, especially the B-29 forces commanded by Major General Curtis LeMay. He left active duty in 1946 with the rank of lieutenant colonel.
It is this context McNamara stated about the fire bombing of 67 Japanese cities and the incineration of hundreds of thousands of civilians: “(General Curtis) LeMay said that ‘If we’d lost the war, we’d all have been prosecuted as war criminals.’ ‘And I think he’s right,” says McNamara. “He, and I’d say I, were behaving as war criminals.”
McNamara went on to be President of Ford Motors and then Secretary of Defense (under Kennedy and Johnston) and later head of the World Bank.

Posted by: tierra | November 13, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

That WAS off the top of my head. Sorry for the insult. Cheer up. You look good and I look bad. You should be thanking me for being so uninformed.
So I appreciate your patience but I’m still up for a little back and forth.
‘And I think he’s right,” says McNamara. “He, and I’d say I, were behaving as war criminals.”
“On April 17, 1972, I’d say I drove home at 3 am completely drunk.”
Both are confessions. The United States was never charged, tried or convicted of war crimes against Japan. Japan’s leaders were tried in the Tokyo Trials in 1946. After all, “History is written by the victors.”
Besides McNamara was in his mid-80′s when he made that statement. He was (probably) half daft and feeling like the grim reaper was looking over his shoulder. In fact, he probably should have been in a confessional.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 13, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Both are confessions.
_________________________________
Again, a lack of thorough thinking on your part Whirled Peas.
What we have in the fire bombing of 67 Japanese cities and the incineration of hundreds of thousands of civilians by the United States case are TWO things:
We have a confession.
And we have the physical evidence. All of this has been documented and authenticated.
As you probably know, the United States via the CIA helped to overthrow a number of democratically elected governments around the world – and replace those democratic governments usually with repressive military dictatorships.
It’s very important the United States properly understands and acknowledges its history – in order to correctly assess both its failures and its successes.
There has been lots of brainwashing going on.
Great country, some disastrous policies – and some evil deeds, just like everybody else.
One might think of the acts of terror and terrorism against the original peoples of America, the acts of terror against african slaves . . . these are part of Americas history as well.
The liberation of Europe, part of American’s history, first man on the moon, finally giving african americans, native people and women the vote – American history.

Posted by: tierra | November 14, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

What we have in the fire bombing of 67 Japanese cities and the incineration of hundreds of thousands of civilians by the United States case are TWO things:
We have a confession.
And we have the physical evidence. All of this has been documented and authenticated.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 14, 2009 12:10:18 AM
______________________________________
“Presidents Roosevelt and Truman justified these tactics by referring to an estimate that seven million American troops would be killed if Japan had to be invaded. Additionally, the Japanese had intentionally decentralized 90 percent of their war-related production into small subcontractor workshops in civilian districts, making remaining Japanese war industry largely immune to conventional precision bombing with high-explosives.”
History is full of bad things around the world, tierra. To focus only on the United States is to ignore most of history as we are less than 300 years old. We have to stop being expected to apologize for everything bad or wrong we have done – especially during wartime, which I believe is what J. House was saying in his original post.
WWII was not Iraq. It was a “legally declared war.” We were at war with Japan who attacked us first. McNamara and LeMay were following orders from their superiors. I find it interesting that you did not bring for the information that “the Japanese had intentionally decentralized 90 percent of their war-related production into small subcontractor workshops in civilian districts.” Did you willfully withhold that?
Lemay said he expected to be tried for war crimes if Japan had won. As I said, history is written by the victors. Roosevelt and Hoover backed them up. Roosevelt would have been guilty of war crimes had we lost.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Pease | November 14, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Pease | Nov 14, 2009 1:29:58 PM
I’m glad you’re able to brush off the fact the United States firebombed to death hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians so easily. Nevermind the dropping of 2 atomic bombs on civilian targets.
And I’m glad you’re able to find excuses and justifications for that. People all over the world can find justifications for the evils they perpetrated.
And I’m sure you can find good justification for the terror done to native americans, and the terror perpetrated on african slaves and so on . .. and the overthrow of elected democracies.
That after all is the goal right – not to acknowledge or address wrongs committed, but to rationalize them and bury them. And for heaven’s sake, don’t even think about apologizing or attempting to right wrongs.
Right? That is your America.

Posted by: tierra | November 15, 2009, 3:25 am 3:25 am

Posted by: tierra | Nov 15, 2009 3:25:15 AM
You want to discuss it legally or morally? Decide.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 15, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

And I’m sure you can find good justification for the terror done to native americans, and the terror perpetrated on african slaves and so on . ..
Posted by: tierra | Nov 15, 2009 3:25:15 AM
The country was founded through the result of religious persecution. Using your silly line of thinking, it would then be England’s fault that Americans ended up in the New World in the first place. And then you’d have to go all the way back through the history of England since several groups invaded England and drove out the group before them.
The shippers in the Slave trade were, in order of scale, the Portuguese (and Brazilians), the English, the French, the Spaniards, the Dutch, and the North Americans. Why aren’t you railing against them?
If you want to go back in time, as it seems you do, perhaps you should look at your own ancestors and find out who they replaced to establish their own sovereignty. Everyone replaces someone with varying degrees of violence to do it. Someone suffers, regardless.

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 15, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 15, 2009 6:24:39 PM
Obviously your parents taught you nothing about owning up to your own mistakes, but to always try to deflect the blame onto someone else.
Great, we need more like you in the world.

Posted by: tierra | November 16, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.