Today’s Qs for O’s WH – 11/23/2009
TAPPER: While we're on the subject of the deficit, the president said last week, "I think it's important, though, to recognize, if we keep adding to the debt, even in the — even in the midst of this recovery, at some point people could lose confidence in the way the U.S. — in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession." What steps is the president prepared to take to get us out of this hole?
GIBBS: Well, again, we'll broaden this just slightly. For the entirety of our administration, we've dealt with, in many ways, dual challenges. How do you get the economy back on track? What do you have to do to both create economic growth, which then is what you have to have in order to create job growth, as well as understanding a dramatic change in the past decade in our fiscal situation? So, obviously, both of those are — have to be taken into account. Like I said a second ago, the biggest driver in — the two biggest drivers were tax cuts and prescription drug benefit, programs that weren't paid for. The second biggest driver is a downturn in our economy. So, first and foremost, the president will focus on what can be done to get our economy moving again, what can be done to help spur the creation of jobs, and continued economic growth. And like I said, I think the conversation in some ways has been changed. The discussion that's being had now, as you know, is — is how to pay for health care.
TAPPER: That's — but, I mean, that's not really any major — I mean, so the answer to what can be done to get us out of…
(CROSSTALK)
GIBBS: Well, first and foremost…
TAPPER: … get the economy back in…
GIBBS: Well, first and foremost, that's — that's — yes, that's — a downturn in the economy caused by the recession, a change in tax receipts is, first and foremost, what can be done. Obviously, there are meetings that continue today in — in terms of putting the budget together for next year, understanding that the president believes that we are going to have to continue next year to balance what has to be done to create — continue economic growth and create demand for jobs, as well as balancing our fiscal situation, which the president also said last week in those interviews.
TAPPER: Right, but how — OK, understood, the economy, getting the economy back on track, that will increase revenues. But the president said specifically, even if — when the economy bounces back and — and…
(CROSSTALK)
GIBBS: Well, and — and — but you've heard the president talk quite a bit about the fact that we most assuredly have to get our fiscal house in order. Again…
TAPPER: Right. But what does he — what does he think should be done?
GIBBS: Well, that's the — they're working on putting together the budget for next year. One of the first things he talked about was taking into account the massive amounts of money that the government spends on health care each year, which passing health care reform over the next 10-year period cuts about $130 billion, according to the Senate bill, out of the deficit.
TAPPER: Right, well, that's $13 billion a year. That's not even a quarter of what we — what we borrow from China every year.
GIBBS: Well — but if you don't start somewhere, you're not going to get anywhere. I think the president understands that we've got, again, very dual challenges that have to be addressed in getting our economy moving again, as well as taking into account our long-term fiscal health.
-jpt
Email
Obama: 'Now Is the Time For Common Sense Action'
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
Why isn’t the MSM reporting on the cover up by the Obama Administration in regard to the firing of Inspector General Walprin?
He was fired after investigating misuse of AmeriCorp funds by one of Obama’s friends–Mayor Kevin Johnson.
This is how Obama is going to change the way Washington does business?
Posted by: hank | November 23, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Spending on health care has to be brought under control. The US cannot afford to spend a trillion dollars PER YEAR more than the average first would nation with nothing to show for it (same life expectancy, or lower, even though we smoke less!).
Once health care is no longer wasting a trillion dollars a year from the economy, taxes have to go up. Across the board. No one likes taxes, but if you want to live in a first world nation you have to pay for it. And taxes now are at a completely unsustainable and historic low point. Even Reagan didn’t slash taxes this low on the wealthy or exclude as many people from the rolls entirely (although he started both trends).
But the chances of Obama coming out with this reality now? Not a chance. There are still too many idiots who live in a bubble of complete ignorance who think they are ‘over taxed’ (while paying the lowest total taxes in the first world and the lowest in the US for almost a century).
Posted by: jhw539 | November 23, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
“I spend every waking hour, when I’m talking to my economic team about how to put people back to work”.
He’s so brilliant.
What if Palin had said something so dumb?
Posted by: mick | November 23, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
If the prescription drug coverage is such a budget buster, it is within this Congress’s power to cancel it, and within the President’s power to ask that be done.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
In an interview last week Obama said “at some point people will lose confidence in the economy”.
Huh? Obama is so far out of touch and disconnected from regular working/unemployed Americans.
Who has confidence in the economy–his friends at Wall Street? They sure aren’t hurting.
Posted by: millie | November 23, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
The thrill is gone.
Can’t you feel it?
It’s all Obama’s baby now.
The economy, the war, the debt, terrotist attacks, the lousy health care bill.
He owns it all.
Posted by: larry | November 23, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Is English a second language for Gibbs?
Posted by: Bigguy | November 23, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
The GOP Congress has indeed become the best Congress money can buy! I do not think that many of us are really surprised by this but the question is “what do we do to overcome this long-time problem?”
Saturday night’s Senate Vote Just to have a debate on Healthcare, was a small victory for the “agents of change” (democrats) and reflects very poorly on the state of the Party of No & Fear that they would not even allow a debate on this issue to move forward — thereby belying the title of being the greatest deliberative body on earth!
It is noteworthy, that in the past, the Party of No & Fear, also fought against Social Security Reform and Medicare, and true to form or color, they are fighting against healthcare reform today! Yes, Social Security and Medicare are subject to abuse and fraud, but there is a reform in the healthcare bill to address this problem! Millions depend on Social Security and Medicare and they are glad that it is there. They want it improved upon not done away with.
The naysayers have even tried to Sabotage the reform by introducing a phony abortion debate (we all know Nancy Pelosi will never allow the choice of having an abortion or not to become obsolete) , the other phony womens’ issue (how time appropriate) introduced (I smell a rat) into the debate — is that of Mammograms and the fear that we are somehow on our way to healthcare rationing. Yet most of us are already aware that we are experiencing healtcare rationing every time someone is denied healthcare because of a Preconceived Condition or some other phony condition like they weigh too much, etc. The aforementioned debates are false and designed to produce fear, to immobilize and to paralyze the masses to do nothing. We must come to recognize that “Fear is the dark ones’ most powerful weapon against the light because the energy of fear not only forms a barrier between the consciousness and the soul, it refuels the darkness to keep it thriving.” [Matthews Messages].
We must also recognize that “as money has in the past ministered to personal and family need, so in the future it must minister to group and world need. The time has now come when money must be re-valued and its usefulness channelled into new directions. The voice of the people must prevail, but it must be a people educated in the true values, in the significance of a right culture, and in the need for right human relations. It is therefore essentially a question of right education and correct training in world citizenship – a thing that has not yet been undertaken.” [Money, The Medium of Loving Distribution, A Compilation from the books of Alice A Bailey ]
Thank God for the Agents of Change who try to make a difference in the lives of ordinary human beings, whose intentions and Duty are to uplift the conditions of the people and to serve the people…. They try to raise the minimum wage, they try to extend unemployment benefits, they try to make sure there is clean water and clean air, but its hard and there is always a fight from the best Congress money can buy, whose mission is to stall and to obstruct and to incite fear! And, at this time in our history, like so much else, Healthcare reform is Crying Out for Change. And, as Science teaches us to do nothing and to be static only leads to decay — only leads to death.
Posted by: Angellight | November 23, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
$300 million to buy a vote for Obamacare–to DEBATE ObamaCare.
And Gibbs says Obama is happy with how things are progressing.
300 million dollars
They act like America has an endless well of cash to spend. Reckless and shameful.
Vote them out in 2010.
Posted by: bailey | November 23, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
One thing for certain is sending money to fake congressional districts doesn’t do much nor does hiring workers to put facades on outhouses. The President has always talked of bubbles, yet we had cash for clunkers and still have tax credits for home buyers. It is not so much giving someone a few grand but what the few grand actually cost when it is borrowed and sent through one Government agency after the next is staggering.
My grandparents and parents always said that you cannot borow your way out of debt yet all the spending being done is with debt and the debt we are incurring is not being spent by the actual debtors (us) but by a bunch of bueracrats who as usual think they know better than us.
Posted by: david | November 23, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
I don’t know where you all live, but in California I know I’m overtaxed and it hasn’t helped our economy any. We also need less government “programs” sucking us dry.
Posted by: wow | November 23, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
“No one likes taxes, but if you want to live in a first world nation you have to pay for it.”
Who hasn’t been paying for it?
“The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 62% believe tax cuts are a better way to create jobs and fight unemployment.
“Only 21% believe that additional stimulus spending is a more effective tool. Earlier this year, as the first stimulus package was being debated in Congress, 62% of voters wanted the plan to have more tax cuts and less spending.
“Given a different choice today, 51% believe canceling the rest of the stimulus money would create more jobs while 32% say spending the money would be the better approach to job creation. These findings are consistent with earlier polling.
“Most Americans say that, generally speaking, increased government spending is bad for the economy. Earlier this year, before the unemployment rate had reached its current highs, 45% wanted to cancel the rest of the stimulus spending while just 36% disagreed.
“While voters believe that tax cuts and stopping spending is the path to job creation, the Political Class disagrees. (SURPRISE!)
“Sixty-nine percent (69%) of those in the Political Class say that spending the stimulus money would create more jobs than canceling the remaining stimulus spending.
“Fifty-five percent (55%) of the Political Class believes that new spending will create more jobs than tax cuts…”
Posted by: Krakatoa | November 23, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
If the prescription drug coverage is such a budget buster, it is within this Congress’s power to cancel it, and within the President’s power to ask that be done.
Posted by: MayBee | Nov 23, 2009 3:16:25 PM
As well as raise taxes. Those two things are within their power to do.
-eliminate prescription drug coverage
-cancel Bush’s tax cuts
-raise taxes
-leave Iraq
-leave Afghanistan
-raise tarrifs on foreign imports
-eliminate sending money to other countries
-eliminate the Dept of Education
-evict the United Nations
-sell California to the highest bidder (optional)
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
ROFLMAO!
Rasmussen’s new made up metric, Political class versus everyday Americans.
I thought he had shelved it but I guess his paying audience of right wingers demanded its return.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
What working person who PAYS TAXES honestly says I want to raise my taxes because I don’t think they are high enough?
I have a mortgage and college payments and responsibilities to my family. I just want my government to be as responsible and frugal as I have to be.
Posted by: wow | November 23, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
ROFLMAO!
Rasmussen’s new made up metric, Political class versus everyday Americans.
Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 23, 2009 3:47:43 PM
At least he’s not fact-checking Saturday Night Live skits… ’cause that would be REALLY dumb.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“What working person who PAYS TAXES honestly says I want to raise my taxes because I don’t think they are high enough?”
Because deficits in government are no more advisable then having them at home so if you want a program, you have to pay for it.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Standard Chartered Plc, Aletti Gestielle SGR, HSBC Holdings Plc and Scotia Capital Inc. say the dollar will depreciate as much as 6.4 percent versus the euro. About $12 trillion of fiscal and monetary stimulus, the world’s lowest borrowing costs and a record $4 trillion of government bond sales between 2009 and 2010 will weigh on the currency, they said. So will the nation’s 10.2 percent unemployment rate and signs that the economic recovery may falter, they said.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
RCP average Obama approval among voters: 46.7%.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Gibbs either just lies or he is clueless , but it is not helpful to anyone to let slide statements like “the downturn in the economy was due to the recession “.
Posted by: nat turner | November 23, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Gibbs forgot to mention the HUGE upcoming Jobs Summit that our University President Obama is going to hold in December. That will get everything going. Kumbya!
According to the WH Blog, the Stimulus already has us on the right track right? Can’t you just feel it?
Posted by: Aaron | November 23, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Because deficits in government are no more advisable then having them at home so if you want a program, you have to pay for it.
===========
Unfortunately, if you don’t want a program, you still have to pay for it.
The problems come from people who want the programs and are promised that someone else will be paying for it.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Translation: “I don’t know.”
Posted by: Monty | November 23, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Because deficits in government are no more advisable then having them at home so if you want a program, you have to pay for it.Posted by: Ryan C
****************************************
That’s the point Ryan……….I don’t want these “programs” that are inefficient and poorly run. Is there an opt out clause because right now I see our money being very poorly managed.
Posted by: wow | November 23, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“The problems come from people who want the programs and are promised that someone else will be paying for it.”
But you could say that about all government financing.
I don’t want my tax payers supporting ______________! is a frequent refrain.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
“If you would like a graphic example of the fiscal disconnect characterizing the liberal establishment currently running the country, the front page of today’s New York Times provides it. The lead story has a two-column head, “Federal Government Faces Balloon in Debt Payments.” The subhead alludes to the very real possibility that interest on the debt in ten years might exceed $700 billion, up from $202 billion this year.”
$700 billion in annual debt service. More money paying debt service every year than Bush spent in six years in Iraq. Where in the world does Obama–or anyone else–think that money will come from?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“That’s the point Ryan……….I don’t want these “programs” that are inefficient and poorly run. Is there an opt out clause because right now I see our money being very poorly managed.”
Why not an opt out clause on defense spending?
How about education spending?
Such a system would be a budgetary nightmare even when used on a small scale (ie a small town or community)
See that was my point, we don’t get to pick and choose which programs we support.
We get to pick and choose our representatives.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
True. The Iraq War: $915 billion and counting…
———-
Yes, @Octavia, and that isn’t going to go away just because we start spending more money on other things.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
But you could say that about all government financing.
==============
Absolutely, which is why I think we need to be very careful with what the government promises to fund, and how.
As the prescription drug benefit demonstrates, it is very difficult to get rid of a program once it has begun, even as the current President and Congress rails against it.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
As experts debate the potential speed of the US recovery, one figure looms large but is often overlooked: nearly 1 in 5 Americans is either out of work or under-employed.
According to the government’s broadest measure of unemployment, some 17.5 percent are either without a job entirely or underemployed. The so-called U-6 number is at the highest rate since becoming an official labor statistic in 1994.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
According to the WH Blog, the Stimulus already has us on the right track right? Can’t you just feel it?
Posted by: Aaron | Nov 23, 2009 4:13:23 PM
Yes. The stimulus has already stimulated about as much as it’s going to. Of course, many of the shovel-ready jobs will be kicking in soon. Just as soon as the owners skim most of the profits off the top of the money awarded.
“The government’s economic stimulus spending has already had its biggest impact and probably won’t contribute to significant growth next year, a top White House adviser said Thursday.
“Christina Romer, the chair of President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, said the initial jolt of the $787 billion stimulus expanded the economy in the second and third quarters of this year. But she said the remaining spending will simply keep the economy from slipping.
“”By mid-2010,” she said, “fiscal stimulus will likely be contributing little to further growth.”" -Jim Kuhnhenn, Associated Press Writer
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“tax cuts…programs that weren’t paid for.”
True liberal stupidity…you let the person who earned the money keep more of it by way of a tax cut and you get from the libs that it isn’t paid for…forget the fact that tax revue went up after the bush tax cuts…more money came in after the tax, then before the tax cut and the clueless libs scream and yell…why don’t you libs just voluntarily pay more in taxes and leave the rest of us alone….I have to justify keeping more of what I earn????liberal stupidity
Posted by: HobokenJohn | November 23, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
RCP includes in its average three polls of voters. Today’s Obama approval in those polls are 48%, 46%, and 46%.
If anyone knows of any other polls of voters, please direct us to it.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
But you could say that about all government financing.
I don’t want my tax payers supporting ______________! is a frequent refrain.
Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 23, 2009 4:21:46 PM
Which is why elected officials are SUPPOSED to listen to their constituents. They don’t. They live in a bubble in Washington.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
“If you would like a graphic example of the fiscal disconnect characterizing the liberal establishment currently running the country, the front page of today’s New York Times provides it”
If it doesn’t appear in 36 pt bold font with a red siren how will right wingers know its important?
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
“Spending on health care has to be brought under control.”
According to the Dean of the Harvard Medical School, the proposed legislation won’t.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Top down government spending only puts money into the bank accounts of already wealthy individuals. How are all these pork programs, bailouts and God knows what else being handed out to lobbyists any different than the “military-industrial complex”? At least with honest government contracts, thousands of defense industry and related workers have jobs.
The only way we see any benefit from the free market system is if the companies have to make money the old fashioned way…EARN it!
Posted by: RR GOP | November 23, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
See that was my point, we don’t get to pick and choose which programs we support.
We get to pick and choose our representatives.
Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 23, 2009 4:31:21 PM
The majority of whom SEEM to forget who sent them there once they get inside “The Bubble.” At that point, they are more concerned about staying there. Then we have to start all over again in the elections.
The problem is that they actually go to Washington. They should have to stay in their own district and watch C-Span like the rest of us! Then they can vote online! (/sarc – sort of)
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
“RCP includes in its average three polls of voters.”
Again why call something the RCP average when RCP has nothing to do with it?
Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 23, 2009 4:52:46 PM
It doesn’t say “the RCP average.”
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
That’s true too: The Iraq War:$915 billion and counting… and how much inefficiency, waste and war-profiteering was found again?
==========
I’m gong to ask again- how does this argument work, exactly?
The government already spent too much money we don’t have on something I didn’t want, so now it’s only right they spend more money we don’t have on something I do want. Is that it?
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Which is why elected officials are SUPPOSED to listen to their constituents.
==========
Well, its also why you hope your fellow constituents exercise some common sense.
“You’re going to get something and someone else is going to pay for it” isn’t sustainable, even if it wins votes.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Tax Returns: A Comprehensive Assessment of the Bush Administration’s Record on Cutting Taxes
By Joel Friedman and Isaac Shapiro
_____________________________________
Written/revised: April 23, 2004
Anything new on that?
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
I’m gong to ask again- how does this argument work, exactly?
The government already spent too much money we don’t have on something I didn’t want, so now it’s only right they spend more money we don’t have on something I do want. Is that it?
MayBee | Nov 23, 2009 4:59:50 PM
No, its more like pointing out the guy dropped sand into the engine while changing the air filter, broke the water pump belt and then ran it until it seized solid doesn’t have much credibility to criticize your mechanic’s recommendation to replace the water pump and drop the oil pan to clean and check for damage.
Republican dogma destroyed the economy. And their solution? More tax cuts – just like all of those under Bush that DIDN’T WORK.
Posted by: jhw539 | November 23, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“I’m gong to ask again- how does this argument work, exactly?
The government already spent too much money we don’t have on something I didn’t want, so now it’s only right they spend more money we don’t have on something I do want. Is that it?”
The argument goes that the Republicans aren’t going to get away with blowing hundreds of billions of dollars on an ill-advised war while charging it on a Chinese credit card and then tell us there’s no more money for the social programs and reforms we’ve wanted for years. You can forget it. We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both. That’ll learn ya.
Posted by: Skip | November 23, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Factcheck. on right wing;s fav talking point
“Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain has said that the major tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003 have “increased revenues.” He also said that tax cuts in general increase revenues. That’s highly misleading.
In fact, the last half-dozen years have shown us that we can’t have both lower taxes and fatter government coffers. The Congressional Budget Office, the Treasury Department, the Joint Committee on Taxation, the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers and a former Bush administration economist all say that tax cuts lead to revenues that are lower than they otherwise would have been – even if they spur some economic growth. And federal revenues actually declined at the beginning of this decade before rebounding. The growth in the past three years that McCain refers to brings revenues back in line with the 40-year historical average as a percentage of gross domestic product.
It’s unclear how much of the growth can be attributed to the tax cuts. Capital gains tax receipts did increase greatly from 2003 to 2006, but the CBO estimates that they will level off and decrease in the next few years. The growth overwhelmingly resulted from a sharp rise in corporate tax receipts, the cause of which is a topic of debate.”
The lesson as always?
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Which is why elected officials are SUPPOSED to listen to their constituents.
==========
Well, its also why you hope your fellow constituents exercise some common sense.
Posted by: MayBee | Nov 23, 2009 5:03:45 PM
Good point. All the more reason to stay involved and vote. We all know what happens when the majority realize they can vote themselves entitlements.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Is there an opt out clause because right now I see our money being very poorly managed.
Posted by: wow | Nov 23, 2009 4:20:07 PM
___
That’s true too: The Iraq War:$915 billion and counting… and how much inefficiency, waste and war-profiteering was found again?
*************************************
I find it humorous that you would think I would take issue with that. Any waste leaves less money for what is truly needed. Although I certainly hold hope for the happiness and freedom of the Iraqi people.
But can you imagine how much better government would be if it could be run efficiently. Think how that would benefit our economy and our people.
When I watch our Congress at work it just saddens me. I believe they have no concept of how hard Americans have to work for the dollars they spend so freely.
Posted by: wow | November 23, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
“It doesn’t say “the RCP average.”
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 23, 2009 4:58:04 PM”
Really?
“RCP average Obama approval among voters: 46.7%.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Nov 23, 2009 4:10:16 PM”
Again why invoke RCP for an average he is creating?
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
“The argument goes that the Republicans aren’t going to get away with blowing hundreds of billions of dollars on an ill-advised war while charging it on a Chinese credit card and then tell us there’s no more money for the social programs and reforms we’ve wanted for years. You can forget it. We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both. That’ll learn ya.”
Bravo!
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
This admin is a joke and so are those that still support it.
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | November 23, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“Again why call something the RCP average when RCP has nothing to do with it?”
RCP does have something to do with it: RCP selects those polls for inclusion in its average, and it identifies them as being polls of registered or likely voters. It also identifies as such those polls that do not distinguish between voters and non-voters. Because I consider that voter polls provide a more accurate picture of the sentiments of the electorate as opposed to the public at large, I present the average of those polls.
I also do it because it never fails to infuriate the lower orders, and what could be more fun than that?
In conclusion, I’ll continue to do it.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both. That’ll learn ya.
Posted by: Skip
**************************************
The problem Skip is those folks who pay taxes for the programs you want, aren’t making the money they made in a good economy. Therefore the government isn’t getting the taxes they need to pay for your programs. When there are more takers then givers your idea doesn’t work. Get a job.
Posted by: wow | November 23, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
“It doesn’t say “the RCP average.”
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 23, 2009 4:58:04 PM”
Really?
“RCP average Obama approval among voters: 46.7%.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Nov 23, 2009 4:10:16 PM”
Again why invoke RCP for an average he is creating?
Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 23, 2009 5:21:08 PM
That’s not the post I responded to. It was this one, which has since been removed. Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 23, 2009 4:52:46 PM. Get your nits straight.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
@Octavia
The problem is the credit card has hit its limit…sorry!
Posted by: wow | November 23, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Oh wow. I missed this. Skip answered it much better than I did. Thanks, Skip! Wish I’d just said that! You rock my world.
(Let’s see if someone gets wee wee’d up that I said that after the freak out when I said I loved the President– and I do.)
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 23, 2009 5:31:58 PM
Oh, get a room. ;-)
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
He has no plan. He’s never had a plan. He has “hope and change” and we now have despair and tyranny.
Posted by: jennifert7 | November 23, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
@Octavia As others have pointed out, it doesn’t work that way. We all get stuck paying for something we wouldn’t choose to pay for.
======
Absolutely.
But the difference is between things we are already committed to, and things we are yet to be committed to.
Planning on spending more money because we already spend too much may be satisfying on some level, but that doesn’t make it something we can actually afford to do.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
“The argument goes that the Republicans aren’t going to get away with blowing hundreds of billions of dollars on an ill-advised war while charging it on a Chinese credit card and then tell us there’s no more money for the social programs and reforms we’ve wanted for years. You can forget it. We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both. That’ll learn ya.”
Bravo!
Posted by: Ryan C | Nov 23, 2009 5:22:46 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Republicans “blew” all that money on the war? Ya’ll better check again–that, unlike this health care garbage, was supported by nearly all of congress (dems included) and a majority of Americans.
Posted by: jennifert7 | November 23, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
As others have pointed out, it doesn’t work that way. We all get stuck paying for something we wouldn’t choose to pay for.
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 23, 2009 5:24:35 PM
Basically, elections have consequences.
One side complains – the other side does what they want to do anyway. Everyone pays.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
One side complains – the other side does what they want to do anyway.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 23, 2009 5:50:36 PM
Oh yeah, unless they have some reason to compromise.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
You can forget it. We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both. That’ll learn ya.
=========
No, it will break us financially.
Bush left office with 21% approval partially because he spent too much. Republicans lost Congress partially because they spent too much.
Apparently, nobody is learning, but we will be paying.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
You can forget it. We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both. That’ll learn ya.
=========
No, it will break us financially.
Bush left office with 21% approval partially because he spent too much. Republicans lost Congress partially because they spent too much.
Apparently, nobody is learning, but we will be paying.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
“that war was supported by nearly all of congress (dems included) and a majority of Americans.”
Also, we won it, and as a result we have a stable, democratic ally in the heart of the Arab Muslim world.
On the other hand, the failed stimulus, which cost more than Bush spent on the entire war, accomplished nothing.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Right on cue.
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 23, 2009 5:56:09 PM
I try not to disappoint my “fans.”
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
“We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both.”
Not me. The programs will be funded with borrowed money, and your kids will repay it through their taxes. That’ll learn ‘em.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Chinese credit card and then tell us there’s no more money for the social programs and reforms we’ve wanted for years. You can forget it. We’ll enact the programs anyway and you can help pay for both. That’ll learn ya.
=========
Bush left office with something like 21% approval, in part because he was labeled a big spender. The Democrats came into office promising fiscal responsibility.
“That’ll learn ya” is hardly what they’d promised.
Sadly, it appears nobody is learning anything.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Also, we won it, and as a result we have a stable, democratic ally in the heart of the Arab Muslim world.
________________________________________
You’re very naive . .. ‘stable’ not at all; ‘democratic’ sure for a few more months before it degenerates into civil war . ..
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Apparently, nobody is learning, but we will be paying.
Posted by: MayBee | Nov 23, 2009 5:55:56 PM
It’s ok if the cause is viewed as virtuous… liberals have been pushing the propaganda since FDR. They get to decide was is virtuous and what isn’t. And if you disagree, the buses arrive to dissuade you.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
“We’re going to work with members of Congress to try to come up with sensible and reasonable measures that might spur economic growth…,” White House press spokesman Robert Gibbs told a daily news briefing. (11/23/09)
BWWWAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAHAAA!!!!!
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Oh yawn . .. the Republicans yap on about overspending by the Democrats – when their President just presided over the largest increase in the national debt every seen under a President’s term.
Same old nonsense and hypocrisy – same old tactic. You guys were pathetic in office, we’ll be digging out for centuries.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
“In conclusion, I’ll continue to do it.”
Not exactly news at 11.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 23, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Jake
Must be frustrating to get a nonanswer to your question. The way he avoids a direct answer to your question is so obvious.
I would get tired real quick of having to go into a room, knowing that some idiot is going to stand at a podium, and give propaganda and ramble on.
Hold their feet to the fire Jake. Keep asking and if he doesn’t answer, ask again.
Posted by: James | November 23, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Oh yawn . .. the Republicans yap on about overspending by the Democrats
*****************************
Do you read the news? We have a bad economy, huge debt, no jobs and the Chinese are cutting up our credit card.
There is NO MORE MONEY to spend.
Posted by: wow | November 23, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
the Republicans yap on about overspending by the Democrats – when their President just presided over the largest increase in the national debt every seen under a President’s term.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“Their” president? Oh no, we ain’t taking ‘em. He belongs to you.
Posted by: jennifert7 | November 23, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
And on what basis do you call it “failed”? Specifically… because it’s “on track” to do what it was designed to do– I agree with that.
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 23, 2009 6:19:36 PM
“President Obama went directly to the public today in his first weekly address since moving into the White House, making the case for his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package that he hopes to sign next month.
“Obama spends his first Saturday in office working on his economic plan. ‘I have proposed an American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan to immediately jumpstart job creation as well as long-term economic growth,’ the president said.” -ABC News, January 24, 2009
We’ll probably want to read this again just to be sure we understand what the President said:
“I have proposed an American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan to immediately jumpstart job creation…”
Epic fail.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
There is one thing you never have to personally partake in if you disagree with it, and that is a tax cut.
Posted by: MayBee | November 23, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Jake, what did he say? How can anyone keep from jumping out of their seat and trashing the place, come on now, this has been going on for 8 months that he answers questions like this…I could NEVER have the patience you have, never…I’d be locked up.
They have NO CLUE how to improve the economy. Or worse, they do have a clue and are choosing to ignore the fix.. Which is it?
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 23, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Economist Robert J. Samuelson:
“Now comes the House-passed health-care “reform” bill that, amazingly, would extract more subsidies from the young. It mandates that health insurance premiums for older Americans be no more than twice the level of that for younger Americans. That’s much less than the actual health spending gap between young and old. Spending for those age 60 to 64 is four to five times greater than those 18 to 24. So, the young would overpay for insurance that — under the House bill — people must buy: Twenty- and thirtysomethings would subsidize premiums for fifty-and sixtysomethings. (Those 65 and over receive Medicare.)”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 23, 2009 6:31:47 PM
_______________________________
You’re cherry picking information – just like your ‘honest’ Cheney
January 10, 2009
US president-elect Barack Obama sought to cool down expectations from his incoming administration Saturday, saying the most serious crisis since the Great Depression gripping the United States will probably get worse before the economy starts to improve.
But he expressed confidence Americans will overcome the current difficulties.
“Recovery won’t happen overnight, and it’s likely that things will get worse before they get better,” Obama said in his weekly radio address.
“But we have come through moments like this before … And I am confident that if we come together and summon that great American spirit once again, we will meet the challenges of our time and write the next great chapter in our American story.”
The comments came as new data released Friday showed US unemployment surged to a 16-year high of 7.2 percent as a deepening recession pushed employers to shed a massive 524,000 jobs in December, capping a yearly loss of 2.6 million.
Source: Raw Story
Obama has consistently said recovery would not be easy, nor a quick fix . . and that thinks might get worse before they get better.
The right wing cherry simply cherry picks to make it sound like Obama could wave a magic wand and magically fix the entire economy – not likely after the mess left by the previous administration.
Cheap tactics – as usual.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Good job,Tapper. We need more in the media to start asking tough questions.
Posted by: sjs5150 | November 23, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
More from Samuelson:
“Whatever the added burden, it would darken the young’s already poor economic prospects. Unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds is 19 percent. Peter Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget, notes on his blog that high joblessness depresses young workers’ wages and that the adverse effect — though diminishing — “is still statistically significant 15 years later.” Lost wages over 20 years could total $100,000. Orszag doesn’t mention that health-care “reform” might compound the loss.”
It’s a good time to be old and rich. No young person today will have a chance to have the life I’ve had. It’s a pity.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
That’s much less than the actual health spending gap between young and old. Spending for those age 60 to 64 is four to five times greater than those 18 to 24.
_______________________________________
That’s what insurance companies did – contracted insurance for the young, the healthy and the employed – and left the taxpayer to have to carry the burden of the aged, the sick and the damaged (vets).
The insurance companies skimmed off the cream and left the taxpayer with the rest.
Now that can be equalled out instead of the taxpayer carrying all the burden.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Health care legislation will not go through. Trust me.
Posted by: Jenny | November 23, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Cheap tactics – as usual.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 23, 2009 6:44:50 PM
“I have proposed an American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan to immediately jumpstart job creation…” -Barack Obama as reported by -ABC News, January 24, 2009
Epic fail.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 23, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Barack is WEAK. Uh we are going to cut the deficit by raising taxes in a depression and adding 30 million or so people to health insurance plans subsidized by the tax payer. What the hell are they thinking?
Posted by: Jason | November 23, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | Nov 23, 2009 7:34:42 PM
You’re cherry picking information – just like your ‘honest’ Cheney
January 10, 2009
US president-elect Barack Obama sought to cool down expectations from his incoming administration Saturday, saying the most serious crisis since the Great Depression gripping the United States will probably get worse before the economy starts to improve.
But he expressed confidence Americans will overcome the current difficulties.
“Recovery won’t happen overnight, and it’s likely that things will get worse before they get better,” Obama said in his weekly radio address.
“But we have come through moments like this before … And I am confident that if we come together and summon that great American spirit once again, we will meet the challenges of our time and write the next great chapter in our American story.”
The comments came as new data released Friday showed US unemployment surged to a 16-year high of 7.2 percent as a deepening recession pushed employers to shed a massive 524,000 jobs in December, capping a yearly loss of 2.6 million.
Source: Raw Story
Obama has consistently said recovery would not be easy, nor a quick fix . . and that thinks might get worse before they get better.
The right wing cherry simply cherry picks to make it sound like Obama could wave a magic wand and magically fix the entire economy – not likely after the mess left by the previous administration.
Cheap tactics – as usual.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
And obama said the stimulus package HAD to be passed to keep unemployment at 8% and to create 4 million jobs by the end of summer. Neither happened and Americans for generations have to pay for this EXPERIMENT in the white house.
The experiment failed so it’s time to go home now, obama, axlerod, emmanual, pelosi, reid and the rest of the incompetents. Get ready for the majority to take over.
Posted by: Jenny | November 23, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
“The need for us to act is now. It’s never been more urgent,” President Obama said, warning that “Recovery won’t happen overnight, and it’s likely that, even with these measures, things will get worse before they get better.”
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
“And obama said the stimulus package HAD to be passed to keep unemployment at 8% and to create 4 million jobs”
Posted by: Jenny | Nov 23, 2009 7:51:09 PM
____________________________________
Obama said neither of these things. If you say he did, provide the quote, the source and the date.
You Republicans will have to learn to do research and how not to lie.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
“the rest of the incompetents. Get ready for the majority to take over.”
___________________________________
We had 8 years of Republican incompetence – please – people are not that stupid.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
If only we can give away a few trillion more to the Friends of the V, we can bring prosperity to the world.
Please America, opening your wallet was not enough, we need you to open your veins.
And your children’s and grandchildren’s…
Posted by: Beholden | November 23, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
“I think it’s important, though, to recognize, if we keep adding to the debt, even in the — even in the midst of this recovery, at some point people could lose confidence in the way the U.S. — in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession.”
Obama gets a visit from Captain Obvious.
But since he is coached by Captain Oblivious nothing changes.
What we need is more debt!
Posted by: drjohn | November 23, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
“We had 8 years of Republican incompetence – please – people are not that stupid.”
We’ve gone from stupid to astonishingly stupid.
In a sense, you’re right. We need better. We need real fiscal austerity. We need Sarah Palin.
Posted by: drjohn | November 23, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Under the Bush administration the entire U.S. economy was driven to the edge of a precipice and over into complete freefall. . .
Will it EVER recover? That is really hard to say.
While Bush slept at the wheel, and buried the country in debt, the entire fabric began to unravel – the extensive overspending (of Bush and regular Americans). The gross consumer debt society. All of it driven so long and so hard on nothing it was in complete freefall off a cliff.
And the Republican right have the nerve to blame this on Obama . . .. you should be ashamed.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
“even in the midst of this recovery, at some point people could lose confidence in the way the U.S. — in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession.”
______________________________________
And all the while, the Republican right clamouring for failure – encouraging and cheering on that very loss of confidence. Country first my ass.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Obama approval, likely voters (Rasmussen): 46%.
Obama approval, registered voters (Quinnipiac): 48%.
Obama approval, registered voters (Fox News): 46%.
We’re talking Carter. We’re talking malaise.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 23, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Under the Bush administration the entire U.S. economy was driven to the edge of a precipice and over into complete freefall. . .
Will it EVER recover? That is really hard to say.
While Bush slept at the wheel, and buried the country in debt, the entire fabric began to unravel – the extensive overspending (of Bush and regular Americans). The gross consumer debt society. All of it driven so long and so hard on nothing it was in complete freefall off a cliff.
And the Republican right have the nerve to blame this on Obama . . .. you should be ashamed.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
RCP Average Approval Rating:
Obama Approval: 50.5%
Spread: +6.8
Reagan’s approval ratings fell BELOW 40% during his first term – and he was re-elected.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Some people really don’t understand . ..
Under the Bush administration the entire U.S. economy was driven to the edge of a precipice and over into complete freefall. . . a COMPLETE FREEFALL disaster . ..
Will it EVER recover? That is really hard to say.
While Bush slept at the wheel, and buried the country in debt, the entire fabric began to unravel – the extensive overspending (of Bush and regular Americans). The gross consumer debt society. All of it driven so long and so hard on nothing it was in complete freefall off a cliff.
Anything being done since has been primarily trying to stave off a complete collapse into depression . . .
And the Republican right have the nerve to blame this on Obama . . .. you should be ashamed.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Under the Bush administration the entire U.S. economy was driven to the edge of a precipice and over into complete freefall. . . a COMPLETE FREEFALL disaster . ..
Will it EVER recover? That is really hard to say.
While Bush slept at the wheel, and buried the country in debt, the entire fabric began to unravel – the extensive overspending (of Bush and regular Americans). The gross consumer debt society. All of it driven so long and so hard on nothing it was in complete freefall off a cliff.
Anything being done since has been primarily trying to stave off a complete collapse into depression . . .
And the Republican right have the nerve to blame this on Obama . . .. you should be ashamed.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Can anyone translate what Gibbs is saying here? I’m at a loss to understand any of what he said. I can’t figure out how that guy keeps his job.
Posted by: Max | November 23, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Reagan was fixing the economy not BANKRUPTING THE COUNTRY.
_______________________________
Are you kidding? Ronald Reagan increased the national debt by over $1.6 TRILLION dollars WAY back in 1980 dollars.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Reagan was fixing the economy not BANKRUPTING THE COUNTRY.
_______________________________
Are you kidding? Ronald Reagan increased the national debt by over $1.6 TRILLION dollars WAY back in 1980 dollars.
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Please you are going to Bush hate yourself and us into oblivion.
____________________________________
Under the Bush administration the entire U.S. economy was driven to the edge of a precipice and over into complete freefall. . . a COMPLETE FREEFALL disaster . ..
Will it EVER recover? That is really hard to say.
While Bush slept at the wheel, and buried the country in debt, the entire fabric began to unravel – the extensive overspending (of Bush and regular Americans). The gross consumer debt society. All of it driven so long and so hard on nothing it was in complete freefall off a cliff.
And the Republican right have the nerve to blame this on Obama . . .. you should be ashamed.
Anything being done since (by the current President) has been primarily trying to stave off a complete collapse into depression . . .
Posted by: tierra | November 23, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
The Democrats have been the majority in Congress since 2006 – since Obama has been in office they have had raise the debt ceiling — and National Debt has grown faster under Obama’s watch in the first year than any other President in history.
How long can he keep blaming Bush?
He goes out of the country bowing to world leaders and comes back plays golf on Saturday, then spends our tax dollars on a big State Dinner so he can thank his Hollywood friends. Does he every work — wait he likes all the photo ops.
All of this while unemployment grows and soldiers die in Afghanistan because he can’t make a decision (and he wants to spend more dollars we don’t have on a very poor Health Care bill).
Absolutely the worst President since Carter.
Posted by: susie | November 24, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm