Where was the East Wing?
ABC NEWS' Yunji de Nies Reports:A former White House staff member says had she been on the job, the now notorious White House crashers would never have made it into the State Dinner. Cathy Hargraves tells Newsweek that for years, her focus was to supervise guest lists and clear invitees into the White House. On the night of major events, Hargraves was a fixture at the East Gate portico entrance, greeting guests, vouching for those whom may have inadvertently been left off the list and turning away those who were not supposed to be there.But White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers has said no one from her office was at the gate at last Tuesday's State Dinner, when Michaele and Tareq Salahi slipped past security without an invitation. The couple spent up to two hours on the grounds, making it all the way to the Blue Room to shake hands with the President and Indian Prime Minister. Of course Rogers was at the dinner as well, even pausing at one point to speak with reporters about which designer dress she was wearing (Comme Des Garcons). But Hargraves wasn't at the gate, because she had resigned last June. She told Newsweek that when Rogers came in with the new administration, she changed her job, and revoked most of her responsibilities, essentially demoting her to a date entry clerk, prompting Hargraves to quit.
"I knew she [Hargraves] left but did not know they did not replace the job in the same way," a former White House official speaking on the condition of anonymity told ABC News, "That's really too bad – it really helps them to have this person because it is such a bear of a job but so important."
"It was Cathy who would input all the names, take all the responses, give them to the calligraphers who would address the invites, do the place cards," the former official said, "On game day she was a key link to Secret Service because she was posted at the East Portico with them because she was the most intimately knowledgeable of the list."
Hargraves said had she been there that night, the reality-tv hopefuls never would have made into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Desiree Rogers declined ABC News' request for an interview.UPDATE: The Secret Service says their initial investigation indicates that the breach occurred at the first of two checkpoints, after an officer allowed the couple to pass. The agency spokesman Edwin Donovan says the blame lies squarely with them.
"Bottomline: We're responsible. It could have been very easy to make a phone call or get on a radio and verify if someone was on a list," said Donovan, “This is still our responsibility as we've said from the beginning."
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
The media needs to get over this “fat cat” social faux paux.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | November 30, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
You’d think the White House was being run by a bunch of amateurs from Chicago… and you’d be right.
Posted by: Krakatoa | November 30, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Over on Huffington Post, Cathy Hargraves is being pilloried — because she was from the Bush administration. And they’re all blaming it, not on Desiree, (for being inept, in my own opinion) but all on the Secret Service. And believe me, the SS should be criticized plenty. But I also think Desiree Rogers is way more interested in being seen than in doing any work.
Posted by: Beth | November 30, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
It is only a social faux paux until somone gets hurt! This isn’t a social faux paux it is a security breach.
Posted by: jb | November 30, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
From Newsweek:
“when she [Hargraves] met with Rogers last February and went over her job responsibilities, she says, the new social secretary told her, “We don’t feel we have a need for that anymore.” Rogers’s explanation, according to Hargraves: “In these economic times, I don’t think we’re going to have very many lavish expensive dinners. It wouldn’t look very good.””
Rogers messed up. She should resign. Or maybe she could just transfer to become yet another of Michelle’s hand maidens, er, I mean, staff. She could be the Deputy Associate Director of Posing for Fashion Magazines.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | November 30, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Mrs. Rogers and her husband were at the party hobnobbing with the guests. She was flashing her designer dress rather than doing her job. Then, when found wanting, she blames the Secret Service just like any good Democrat would. Never expect personal responsibility from any of them.
Posted by: Nonnie Mouse | November 30, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
The amateur hour continues – GET SOME FREAKING ADULTS IN THERE! Gibbs will be asked about it today, he”ll laugh that sardonic, insulting laugh–then say something like, “Well won’t you at least ask me who I was wearing and then move on. The damage being done by this White House is becoming almost incalcuable–it is that bad
Posted by: ted | November 30, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
These revelations, even if true, certainly don’t absolve the Secret Service, and they doesn’t necessarily tarnish the Obama administration. One would think somebody from the protocol side should be present, or on call, but shouldn’t the Secret Service have demanded it? They’ve been in this business for awhile.
I say this as one who is definitely NOT a fan of Obama. There are far more significant administration blunders to worry about.
Posted by: Bob | November 30, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Has ABC mentioned the fact that Obama had at least met the crashers before? There’s a photo of them together in 2005. Tareq Salahi also served on the board of the American Task Force for Palestine, where Obama’s close friend Rashid Khalidi was vice president. Interesting coincidence, isn’t it?
Posted by: bgates | November 30, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
This was nothing more than a diversionary tatic used by Obama to divert attention from the Global Warming Hoax and his failure on Afganistan
Posted by: nothing more than a photo-op | November 30, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
If the Secret Service felt that having a greeter at the gate was a vital part of their security procedure, why didn’t they say something to the WH staff? I’m sure they would have done whatever the SS said needed to be done to keep the WH and the 1st family safe.
Posted by: jg | November 30, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
When you have a bunch of clowns…don’t be surprised when a circus breaks out….
Posted by: HobokenJohn | November 30, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Jake –
Why in the world aren’t you writing more about the CRU “climate change” disaster! This has all the earmarks of a Piltdown Man-scale of scientific fraud — with, however, a many-trillion dollar price tag for us.
Please take the MSM lead in exposing this incredibly important story — the British press is all over it.
Posted by: Feynman | November 30, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
ted is completely right. It reinforces that they don’t take this seriously. Obama’s are starting to look just as bad as Bush II in terms of cronyism. Desiree is not qualified for the post and should take responsibility.
Posted by: ohiogal | November 30, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Is there any room left under the bus?
Guess they will just have to reassign her then like Buffy, Anita, Yoshi, Van Jones….
Posted by: No more lies | November 30, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
If I were in charge, it would not have happened. In fact hindsight is always right.
The Secret Service messed up, no one got hurt and hopefully it will not happen again.
Posted by: JL | November 30, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
I just love it that the social secretary was too busy hob-knobbing and talking about her dress than making sure the right job was done. Ego runs rampant in this WH.
Posted by: Aaron | November 30, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
As usual – the WH prefers to blame someone else. If historically the WH staff has been in charge of checking the attendees against the list of invitees – why give them a pass on this? Sounds like Ms Rogers thinks doing her job is beneath her.
Posted by: jane | November 30, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Go ahead and fire Hargraves after the election, but it was the duty of Rogers to REPLACE her with an Obama Administration appointee. Don’t want a Bush hire to do the job? Fine. But that doesn’t mean that security isn’t necessary anymore.
This is reminding me of the advent of the Clintons where the SS were being thwarted for many months over having background checks for the new people in the administration. “We don’t need that anymore’ is an incredibly revealing statement.
The POTUS doesn’t need this level of security? The world suddenly became a less threatening place because Obama is POTUS?
I’d like a reporter to ask Rogers exactly what she meant by that. It’s more than we’re not giving big parties, for what is a state dinner anyway? Or is it ‘our people aren’t threatening so we don’t have to do that song and dance’…?
The job is the same no matter who is in office. ALL parties have to play a role in keeping the president safe, no matter what political ideology they represent.
We are very lucky as a nation that nothing bad happened. If this is glossed over, the inappropriate policies will continue.
Rogers should be ashamed of herself but she won’t be. She should be canned but she won’t be. She’ll just keep preening in designer dresses, and not doing the most important part of her job. Because it doesn’t matter one whit what the place settings looks like if the worst case scenario is going down.
This was a failure on many levels, not just the Secret Service, but they have integrity and will throw themselves under the bus willingly. The OA cronies have none, and thus will blame them only.
Posted by: JR | November 30, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
This WH is too busy with sending emails out about Sarah Palin to fill key positions.
Amateur.
Inept.
Laughable.
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 30, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
nothingmorethanaphotop said:
This was nothing more than a diversionary tatic used by Obama to divert attention from the Global Warming Hoax and his failure on Afganistan
True. But we aren’t distracted.
Dems think we are as stupid as they are…
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 30, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Opps!…yet another mis-read situation for the Administration of “geniuses”!
Posted by: Mike_C | November 30, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Desiree Rogers should have been at the gate or had somebody from her office at the gate checking the names of guests. This is just common sense. The problem is that Rogers thinks she’s a celebrity when she’s not. She is supposed to be in the trenches, behind the scenes, making sure that the party runs smoothly, not attending the party as a guest.
Rogers should be fired. Her skill set and personality don’t match the job.
Posted by: Bubbles | November 30, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Rogers should be fired. Her skill set and personality don’t match the job.
LOL…that can be said of many of those serving in this administration!
Posted by: Mike_C | November 30, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
obummer.
Posted by: obummer guy | November 30, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Did I tell you above Gibbs would be churlish?
“Sheryl Stolberg suggests that if someone from the social office had been at the security gate, the Secret Service would not even have had to relay a question about the guest list. Gibbs sarcastically notes that no question was relayed, even under the circumstances, trailing off: “Leaving aside the fact that that didn’t happen…” (1:49 p.m.)”
Posted by: ted | November 30, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
The social office submitted a guest list to the Secret Service. The Secret Service officer allowed someone in even though they were not on that guest list. How is is the social office’s fault? Regardless of whether there is or is not a social secretary standing by the Secret Service officer’s shoulder, it’s common sense that the officer should not just let people in who are not on the guest list. At the very least, he could have someone place a quick call to the social office to clarify whether this person should be let in but the default position of the SS should not be “let them in anyway, even though they’re not on any guest list”. The default should be that they are told to step aside until it can be confirmed whether or not they should be allowed in.
Posted by: Ron | November 30, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
What happens when you allow friends in high places who do not have a clue,as to the job or what it entails. Jimmy Carter found that out. Obie should have ask about his mistakes,of appointing friends to inept to do the job.
Posted by: lightningF | November 30, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
It seeems the entire Whitehouse is made up of pretenders and wannabee’s mixed in with a few bare knucklers. Of course the Salahis could have been invited in by the whitehouse dog walker to write health care reform or some job creation stimulus bills.
Posted by: david | November 30, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Worst White House ever.
Just waiting for this to be Bush’s fault,too.
Robert Gibbs is the slimiest of them all.
The worshipping press corps isn’t so in love with his ‘jokes’ anymore, are they?
What a debacle.
Posted by: Jackie | November 30, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Just waiting for this to be Bush’s fault,too.
__________________________________
Couldn’t be Bush’s fault, he’s still engrossed in that Goat book . . .
Posted by: tierra | December 1, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am
What about the “place cards”. This was a very formal event. Where were the Salahi’s cards.
If they had a “place setting” they were invited. If not,
then there must have been an awkward moment when guests were asked to take their places.
Were they escorted out or did they chow down???
Posted by: david De Vere | December 1, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Desiree Rogers is an incompetent diva and should be fired right away. She dosent know her job and is more interested in being a celebrity. Shame on her.
Posted by: jenny | December 1, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Instead of hiding behind the Obama brand, she needs to be fired. She is too much of a diva. She has a JOB not a social position. Her dress was a wreck and if she would concentrate on her job instead of holding court, these mistakes would not happen.
Posted by: S. Watkins | December 2, 2009, 7:07 am 7:07 am
I agree, she should go. It was her responsiblity. I find it appalling that they are dancing around what is clear to everyone. We are talking the security of the U.S. Presidency. As an African American female, I hate that she did not do her job. Had they been a minority couple she would have paid much more strict attention.
Posted by: Coventgarden | December 5, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm