White House: We’re Not in the “Immediate Gratification Business”
ABC News’ Jake Tapper and Yunji de Nies report:
President Obama has spent a week in Asia, with high level meetings across four countries. But critics argue all that time and jet fuel has not been well-spent. The President leaves South Korea today with arguably little show for it.
After Obama's joint press conference with President Lee Myung-Bak, White House senior advisor David Axelrod defended the visit to reporters in the hall of the Blue House.
"This not an immediate gratification business. I understand that Washington's in the immediate gratification business," Axelrod said, "We made solid progress on climate change that's been reported. We've helped him clarify understanding on security issues and obviously on economics. But nobody came expecting that all of these things would be resolved on this trip, this is part of laying the foundation."
But the list of disappointments is long:
- official news from the Danish Prime Minister that the upcoming climate change summit in Copenhagen will not yield a binding international agreement.
- Chinese President Hu Jin Tao made no commitments on balancing the yuan, and his government refused to broadcast live Obama's town hall on state television.
- Despite a personal appeal from President Obama, President Hu also continued to oppose economic sanctions on Iran.
- A key meeting in Singapore with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev yielded official confirmation that US/Russian disarmament negotiators will not reach a new agreement before the START treaty expires on December 5th.
Axelrod urged reporters to take the long view, "The ultimate measure is how these issues resolve in the weeks and months and years to come. We have a greater chance for success because of this trip and others he's made."
–Jake Tapper and Yunji de Nies
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
We feel that the US can bark out orders to Couintries around the World, while the Countries with their tails wrapped round the hind-legs, would obey without questions.
So many of us still think that International diplomacy is a fast yielding endeavor.
I am sorry to inform you that the US is just a Country among over 200 Countries of the World. It can only make use of Suasions, Persuasions, compromises and where possible, threats to achieve its objectives.
However, in the case of China, we are dealing with a Country with very strong economic power. A Country that is holding over a trillion dollars in US Assets. A Country that the US has adverse Balance of Trade and Balance payment deficit with. A Country that recorded almost 9% Economic Growth rate in the last quarter.
A Country that is working frantically to strip the US of its Position as the world’s greatest economy. A Country that will work at cross purposes to US Interest in the world, if need be, to stamp its authority in its areas of Interests like Iran and North Korea.
Lets not fool ourselves, America is fast losing its bargaining chips against Nations.
It is in realization of this that President Obama is working frantically to take reclaim America’s goodwill around the World.
But I doubt if oppositions among Americans themselves would allow him to achieve this.
Posted by: Dare Nigeria | November 19, 2009, 5:15 am 5:15 am
With all the issues this Administration has to contend with – two wars, economy, 10%+ unemployment, H1N1, etc. – it is amazing that they took off for Asia for a meet-and-greet with leaders with no expectation of completing anything.
Was this just an extended ‘date night’ because Michelle wanted some really good Chinese food?
These folks (Emanuel, Axelrod, and Gibbs) seem to spend a lot of time talking down expectations after the fact…
Posted by: N2vip | November 19, 2009, 6:34 am 6:34 am
nor are you in the long term success business , mr president….
Posted by: mjishernameo | November 19, 2009, 7:07 am 7:07 am
“official news from the Danish Prime Minister that the upcoming climate change summit in Copenhagen will not yield a binding international agreement.”
Hmmm. So the US will not agree to hamstring its economy by virtue of believing a faith based initiative (AGW) which is itself based on non-repeatable, unverifiable, and in many cases out and out made up data?
I’m missing the part where this is a disappointment.
Posted by: YellowstreamMediaHater | November 19, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am
Time to send in Dr. Al Gore to explain Earth’s million degree core temperatures to these deniers.Somebody should explain the Main Sequence to that “Geophysicist”: Oh Be A Fine Girl, Kiss Me.And that’s with nuclear power!
Posted by: Nephron | November 19, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am
And because of all we owe to the Chinese, they are questioning obama’s expensive DOMESTIC health care legislation. Interesting that the very smart Chinese can see what a train wreck this health care bill would be to our economy, the national debt, and to America’s ability to pay back the Chinese. You might even say the Chinese want us to succeed and not to fail – so that they can get their money back. They obviously don’t have faith that obama and the democrats can do it. I wonder what else the Chinese will question next? Will obama allow them to question it? Yes he will. He is weak.
Posted by: Jenny | November 19, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am
This is a LONG list??? FOUR things?
“Critics argue”??? Who are the critics?
Journalism FAIL, Tapper.
Posted by: msmolly | November 19, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am
“It is important though to recognise if we keep on adding to the debt, even in the midst of this recovery, that at some point, people could lose confidence in the US economy in a double-dip recession,” said Mr Obama.
Reading from his flash cards, written in crayon…
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 19, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 27% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -14. That matches the lowest Approval Index rating yet recorded for this President.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
This guy is a clown and I blame the libs and the independents for hoisting this nightmare on to the country. He is worse than any terrorist attack. We had Carter, then Clinton, now this clown…it should show everybody that we should never let a Democrat anywhere near the White House again.
Posted by: HobokenJohn | November 19, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Nov 19, 2009 9:41:53 AM
Thanks for the update. It may be time for another completely staged town hall meeting and some more shout-outs… throw in a couple of Medal of Honor winners and perhaps a speech about what is above his paygrade. That could really turn things around.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 19, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
He is worse than any terrorist attack.
Posted by: HobokenJohn | Nov 19, 2009 9:58:38 AM
A regular one-man “man caused disaster.”
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 19, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Chuck Schumer, November 2001
“There are also those prisoners of war who we have captured and will capture in Afghanistan and other countries who will receive a trial of some sort. It is clear we need to try those suspects in a forum that achieves two primary goals—two goals, I might add, that may not conflict. First, the Government must have the power to use even the most sensitive classified evidence against these suspects without compromising national security in any way, shape, or form. In addition, those who commit acts of war against the United States, particularly those who have no color of citizenship, don’t deserve the same panoply of due process rights that American citizens receive. Should Osama bin Laden be captured alive—and I imagine most Americans hope he won’t be captured alive. But if he is, it is ludicrous to suggest he should be tried in a Federal court on Center Street in Lower Manhattan.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Posted by: HobokenJohn | Nov 19, 2009 9:58:38 AM
Are we suffering from collective amnesia? How possible is it that we have forgotten how we got into this economic mess.
The mess was not created in a year and it would not be packed in a year.
Through measured steps and collective will, we will get to el-Dorado.
The Country will however keep sinking if we keep looking at the problem with the lens of Republican and Democrat.
Posted by: Dare Nigeria | November 19, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
“…Not in the
“Immediate Gratification Business”…??
Obama better tell that to all the nitwits who voted for him.
.
Posted by: locomotivebreath1901 | November 19, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Obama is in the “Self Gratification” Business.
Posted by: Hymie | November 19, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Are we suffering from collective amnesia? How possible is it that we have forgotten how we got into this economic mess.
I am not suffering from any type of amnesia…we got here because of the Dems…starting from Roosevelt up to Obama…they are the ones who have destroyed the financial stability of this nation.
Posted by: HobokenJohn | November 19, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
While reading these comments I was struck by the negativity without any facts. Than I realized I was reading an ABC blog.. Enuf said.
Posted by: gee | November 19, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
While reading these comments I was struck by the negativity without any facts.
Posted by: gee | Nov 19, 2009 11:20:31 AM
Much like your own comment.
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 19, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Obama can’t tell you the freakin time of day without a telepromter. He has the gravitas of goose down and a styrofoam spine and our enemies know it. Worse, Obama hates America as much as they do. We’re so screwed.
Posted by: devan | November 19, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
When they read stuff like the following, I wonder what sort of madness it is that makes our legislators want to go forward with this healthcare
monstrosity:
“Three-quarters of American voters – 74 percent – like President Barack Obama as a person, but only 47 percent like most of his policies, and voters disapprove 51 – 35 percent of the health care overhaul passed by the House of Representatives which he has endorsed, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.
“Voters disapprove 53 – 41percent of President Obama’s handling of health care.
” Obama’s endorsement of the House of Representatives-passed health care plan makes no difference to 44 percent of American voters, while 24 percent say it makes them view him more favorably; 30 percent less favorably.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
First came the lofty expectations (the waters of the world will subside, and the earth will heal! “We ARE The Change we’ve been waiting for!” Economic stimulus! CHICAGO 2016!!!) Now come the lowered expectations (“We’re not about immediate gratification.” “There could a possible double-dip recession.” “Accounting [of where the stimbucks went] is an ‘inexact science”.)
Frankly, I’m glad if the brakes are slammed on the moon bat “goals” of this administration. I can only pray that there is a reversal of the insidious “civilian court” trial of the Sept. 11 terrorists, and that the Terrorist Hassan is speedily dealt with.
Posted by: Political Diva | November 19, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
I think Axelrod and his Chicago buds thought that a good economic downturn would send the American People rushing into the governments arms. Now they’re starting to realize the folly of that particular strategy. But like all leftwing ideologues, they’re far to rigid and arrogant to change course. Preferring to blame mysterious cabals and legions of rightwing boogeyman for they’re miscalculations and childish mistakes.
Posted by: Mike | November 19, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Obama said “We have restored America’s standing in the world.”
I’m sure he really wanted to say “I” have restored America’s standing.
But what has he restored it to–the Carter Years?
America is broke, indebted to China, and has a weak appeasing leader–that is good?
Posted by: ollie | November 19, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the chairman of that committee, said that arguments raised by Republican senators about whether bin Laden would be afforded Miranda rights if he were captured was a “red herring.”
“The red herring that my friend [Sen.] Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was covering is not realistic,” Leahy said during an appearance on “Washington Journal” on C-SPAN.
“For one thing, capturing Osama bin Laden — we’ve had enough on him, we don’t need to interrogate him,” Leahy added.
The stupid. It burns.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | November 19, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Oh, I’m taking the long view all right, Mr. Axelrod. I’ve taken to longing for the view that doesn’t include any of you people in it. Any chance that might happen BEFORE January, 2013?
Posted by: Constable Dogberry | November 19, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Not in the ‘immediate gratification business’, unless it is flying up to NYC to catch a play or jetting over to Copenhagen to take credit for nabbing the Olympics in Chicago (not).
Posted by: J House | November 19, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
The stupid. It burns.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn
GW Bush…… so many to choose from
not enough space for all the rest of bumbling. stumbling Bushies
“We’re going to get [Bin Laden] Dead or alive, it doesn’t matter to me.”
‘Bin Laden? I don’t think about him much..’
‘I’ve heard the call. I believe God wants me to run for President.
My plan reduces the national debt, and fast. So fast, in fact, that economists worry that we’re going to run out of debt to retire.
Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.
Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job.
Posted by: Yowsa | November 19, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
PALIN PREJEAN
in 2012
Posted by: Repuke | November 19, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
I GIVE A DAMN ABOUT AXELROD BECAUSE OF HIS DAUGHTER’S TRAVAILS. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HIM BECOME A LIL MORE HUMAN.IF HE HAS THE PRESS WITH HIM NOW, HE CAN EXPECT LIL IN THE FUTURE WITH HIS DOUR VISAGE AND SOUR PUSS ATTITUDE. YOU WON; HAVE SOME FUN. BUT EXPECT ADVERISTY IN 2010. OBAMA IS QUICKLY BLOWING IT. IT’S PLAIN AS DAY.
Posted by: DAN SHANTEAL | November 19, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Mission Accomplished.
Posted by: drjohn | November 19, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Why are we dancing around the mind-bogglingly stupid Eric Holder decision and the even more stupid Leahy comment?
Actually, Holder and Leahy give stupid a bad name.
Posted by: drjohn | November 19, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
No happy endings?
Posted by: Krakatoa | November 19, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Who is responsible for this mess?? We the people are both liberals and conservatives. Liberals for their appeasement attitude and conservative for not demanding a better person to vote for then McCain. The MSNM picked him and we let them. So why are all of you bitching?? It is called be responsible! It is as if conservatives are afraid of a truly conservative canidate. Who cares what the Dems think. A decent man or woman who is truthful & willingly knowing they & their families will be shredded by the news media!
Posted by: Ruth Skidmore | November 19, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
I more and more think that when it all starts falling apart at breakneck speed, there will still be a handful of fools abroad in the land yammering like so many chimpanzees about George W. Bush.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
“The most open and accessible administration in American history” unless you would criticize it, then you will be called cynical, a spreader of myths or far worse..
Posted by: Ed Taylor | November 19, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Posted by: drjohn | Nov 19, 2009 3:00:36 PM
Hey, don’t forget Turbo Tax Timmy!
Echoing Democrat’s Comments, Two Republicans Call for Geithner to Go
Geithner Pushes Back, Blames Bush Administration for Problems
-ABC News
Posted by: Visualize Whirled Peas | November 19, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
We have a higher power Dare! And we have been a sleeping giant, but alas we are awaken! Thx Dare, very good post.
Posted by: thiacyn | November 19, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
O-bow-ma comes up with yet another creative way to waste taxpayer $$$.
I thought our standing in the world had improved with the coronation of our Boy King? I thought through his “charisma” and “charm” all would be well in the world?
The day is coming when a majority of Americans will wish that Bush were in office instead of Obummer. I predict that day to come about the 4th week into KSM’s “show trial”….
Posted by: tjp612 | November 19, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I Must be very difficult for Jake Tapper to report on this president. He has to know people, possibly friends and relatives that have lost their jobs, don’t like this president, don’t like health care and all the while trying to keep that edge out of his reporting. Lots of times I can read between the lines. Its not what he says it’s what he dosen’t say that speaks the loudest. But the tide is turning and lots of people are saying this is a failed presidency. May good help us all.
Posted by: janranch | November 19, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
The day is coming when a majority of Americans will wish that Bush were in office
Posted by: tjp612
thanx for the good laugh
Posted by: Repuke | November 19, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Of the several distressing examples of Pres. Obama’s shortcomings displayed on this trip, none chafes more than this one: “The U.S. and Russia now confirm they will fail to complete a nuclear arms reduction accord by Dec. 5, when the current Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty expires.”
What In The World?!!
Remember his lofty talk just last month about ridding the earth of ALL nuclear arms? This man cannot even keep a cobwebby 1991 agreement on the books. “All hat and no cattle.”
This is scary and trumps everything: the politicized debauchery of his stimulus, the contempt for American capabilities shown in his health care takeover, and all the rest of his “We won” Banana Republic-building.
As dreadful as all the wreckage Obama has heaped upon this nation in these last 10 months, all are dwarfed by the shadow of this single enormous failure.
Posted by: Carol | November 19, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
KSM’s “show trial”
Posted by: tjp612
as opposed to republican ‘no trials’
now, the paranoid ‘right’ doesn’t want terrorists tried because Obama is Pres…
Posted by: Texas | November 19, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Economics? How about that free trade deal between the US and our great friend South Korea. How’s that going Mr. President, or should we ask your main economic adviser, Andy Stern of the SEIU?
Posted by: Aaron | November 19, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Coups sometimes happen when dear leaders are out of town. Nobama
-likes- flying around in the booster seat in Air Force Won – seeing interesting places, like, um NYC. He can’t stand the U.S., isn’t from here, and could care less about staying home to fix problems. Demos are all insane. It’s that Washington DC water that has poisoned their minds.
Posted by: Bill Lewis | November 19, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
likes- flying around in the booster seat in Air Force Won – seeing interesting places, like, um NYC. He can’t stand the U.S
__________________________________
When pressed for his most intelligent response, Bill reverted to insults from grade four.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
“But critics argue all that time and jet fuel has not been well-spent.”
_____________________________________
Gotta love it when reporters use a vague “critics argue” to try to make up for not doing the work themselves. And worse to not even name the critics.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
now, the paranoid ‘right’ doesn’t want terrorists tried because Obama is Pres…
Posted by: Texas |
and you believe this because…?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | November 19, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Gotta love it when reporters use a vague “critics argue” to try to make up for not doing the work themselves. And worse to not even name the critics.
Posted by: tierra |
Are you saying that criticism from an unnamed source is somehow not valid and therefore we should ignore your criticism because you didn’t name your source?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | November 19, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
“…as opposed to republican ‘no trials’”
It was Obama who ordered the military commissions not to succeed. It was Holder’s law firm that successfully delayed those trials. This is one of the reasons his presidency is now a dangerous failure.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Actually tierror the “worst” is liberals like you wasting on-line space defending the zero in chief. He accomplished nothing on that trip. Btw this isn’t a press conference and I’m not surprised to hear you are still working towards finishing grade school.
Posted by: Bill Lewis | November 19, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
This man cannot even keep a cobwebby 1991 agreement on the books. “All hat and no cattle.”
___________________________________
Oh please, try to read a little history. It was George Bush Jr. who virtually killed START III.
in June 2002, Bush Jr. unilaterally withdrew from the 1972 ABM Treaty because it limited the ability of the United States to develop new antimissile defenses.
This basically killed START III, leaving the new administration back at the starting line.
You seem quit unaware of the damage the Bush administration caused to international treaties and international relationships.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
You seem quit unaware of the damage the Bush administration caused to international treaties and international relationships.
Posted by: tierra |
Are you aware of the growing sentiment around the world about POTUS?
Would it ever even occur to you that the Russians think they can get a better deal? I bet it occurred to them.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | November 19, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
You seem quit unaware of the damage the Bush administration caused to international treaties and international relationships.
In June 2002, Bush Jr. unilaterally withdrew from the 1972 ABM Treaty because it limited the ability of the United States to develop new antimissile defenses.
This basically killed START III, leaving the new administration back at the starting line.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
World leaders are taking the measure of Obama and detecting that he is weak and easily outmaneuvered.
We are in serious trouble with him at the helm.
Posted by: dream | November 19, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
How long must we wait for this ?? to become president. All this stuff is not President Bushes fault even the dumbest of the dumb should have realized that by know its like thee year olds he did it not me not my fault brother did it. GIMMY A BRAK.
Posted by: earl | November 19, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
World leaders are taking the measure of Obama and detecting that he is weak and easily outmaneuvered.
_____________________________
This is your guess from your limited viewpoint. The truth could be quite the opposite.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Obama is setting travel records at a time our country can least afford it. Lead by example and take care of our problems at home before your ongoing world tour.
Posted by: Charlie C | November 19, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
The apology tour continues. America is fast losing its respect amongst the nations of the world.
Posted by: Irish prince | November 19, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
America is fast losing its respect amongst the nations of the world.
_________________________________
Nonsense, its the exact opposite.
Before Obama came to power less than 50% of the world (closer to 40%) thought the United States could be counted on to do the right thing. Now that number stands at 70%.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
The rage across this country is palpable
__________________________________
Actually the President polls at number very close to his election victory numbers.
Are people fed up with the bickering and back-biting of politicians and the lack of civil cooperation? Of course they are . . and we know where the source of that comes from.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“Actually the President polls at number very close to his election victory numbers.”
False. His poll number among voters is actually much closer to McCain’s election defeat numbers (45.7%).
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
In an interview with Bill Press regarding the health care legislation currently being debated in Congress, Rep. John Conyers said Rahm Emanuel has told Congress, “Just give us anything and we’ll declare victory.”
Obama has not led on the fight for a good health care bill that could actually help people
He is weak and lacking in any principles worth noting.
And thinks that being wishy-washy and easily pushed around is the same as being willing to negotiate.
Posted by: dream | November 19, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
President Obama’s approval rating has hit a new low of 46 percent, according to a FOX News poll released Thursday. An equal number — 46 percent — disapprove of the job he’s doing.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
“Actually the President polls at number very close to his election victory numbers.”
False. His poll number among voters is actually much closer to McCain’s election defeat numbers (45.7%).
____________________________________
Oh yes, if you cherry pick one pollster you can get the numbers to say almost anthing you want.
The truth is many pollsters have Obama above 50% – far from the number you post.
Besides, Reagan was down below 40% at points in his presidency – and he successfully ran and completed 2 terms.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
“Before Obama came to power less than 50% of the world (closer to 40%) thought the United States could be counted on to do the right thing. Now that number stands at 70%.”
Gosh, isn’t that wonderful? I guess that means China will now respond to complaints about human rights; Iran will abandon its nukes; ditto North Korea; Russia will join us in sanctions on Iran; and the Israelis and Palestinians will make peace.
Oh, wait…
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Posted by: AStoner | Nov 19, 2009 7:58:28 PM
“Before Obama came to power less than 50% of the world (closer to 40%) thought the United States could be counted on to do the right thing. Now that number stands at 70%.”
You may not know what ‘doing the right thing’ means, but to individuals polled around the world it means to act in a morally correct way.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Three-quarters of American voters – 74 percent – like President Barack Obama as a person, but only 47 percent like most of his policies, and voters disapprove 51 – 35 percent of the health care overhaul passed by the House of Representatives which he has endorsed, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
The reason the TRIALS where delayed so long is that ACLU types have been filing lawsuits arguing for the TERRORISTS “RIGHTS”. Some of the same scum lawyers are now part of the 0bama justice department!!!!
Holder was involved with some of the law firms perpetrating this treason! In
any other administration other then this CORRUPT, INEPT, CRIMINAL GANG. He would have to recuse himself. But liberals are lower then whale droppings in the ocean!
The clown snarking on the Start treaty.. GET THE H@LL out of the USA.
Posted by: Mike | November 19, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
“The truth is many pollsters have Obama above 50% – far from the number you post.”
False again. No current poll of voters, as opposed to all adults, has Obama as high as 50%. There are three current voter polls, and they have him at 46, 46 and 48.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Some of the same scum lawyers are now part of the 0bama justice department!!!!
_____________________________________
Oh, and that inconvenient Supreme Court of the United States – I suppose you think they’re just a ‘scummy’ bunch too.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
“The truth is many pollsters have Obama above 50% – far from the number you post.”
_____________________________________
Absolutely true as stated.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
“Rasumussen couldn’t add 2 and 2 together and come up an answer unless the Republican leadership told them the answer they wanted first–”
Check his results in the 2004 and 2008 presidential election (and in NJ this month) and report back.
How does the Quinnipiac number suit you?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
“You seem quit unaware of the damage the Bush administration caused to international treaties and international relationships.”
I am aware that respect is different from fawning adoration. Under Bush the Libyans gave up their nuclear ambitions altogether and even the Iranians lay low. Under Obama, Iran feels empowered to make very little pretense at cooperation. Despite his Nobel prize for 12 days of accomplishment, American foreign policy is a mess. Bush did not insult the British with a box set of CDs, hug the Queen, bow to the Saudi king, throw Eastern Europe under the bus for nothing in return, apologize to our enemies, drive unemployment to record levels, achieve a 6 to 1 fundraiser ratio with either Clinton or Bush, throw lavish parties, visit with an avowed communist in the white house, and fail meven to intimidate a cabal news network. This guy is a loser, and even with an overwhelming majority in both houses, all he can accomplish is payoffs to union thugs and pet liberal organizations.
Posted by: Len Johnson | November 19, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
“The bottom line is that Rasmussen would be more useful, say, for midterms next fall than on issues or approval ratings.”
Why would there be a difference? His approval ratings seem remarkably close to those of Fox/Opinion Dynamics, which afe the only other two I’m aware of that poll voters as opposed to adults.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Posted by: Len Johnson | Nov 19, 2009 8:32:43 PM
“You seem quit unaware of the damage the Bush administration caused to international treaties and international relationships.”
Len you do understand what an international treaty is right? And international relationships.
And p.s. – Len – do you think Iran’s nuclear facilities suddenly sprang up in the past 9 months? Guess what, they didn’t – they were started and progressed under Bush’s watchful eye.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Octavia, I’m not sure I understand what you mean (but I’m also not sure I understand what “presidential approval” is, either).
There’s all kinds of evidence that poll results can vary crazily depending on how the question is posed, and some of the exposes of the variations have made for some fun reading. I would think–although I don’t know–that the presidential approval one is pretty standard, viz. “do you approve of the way the president is doing his job so far?” or something similar.
I’m sure that answers do, indeed, vary as a number of factors over which the president has very little control change. But that’s something that all of them have had to deal with since the onset of polling.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
“You seem quit unaware of the damage the Bush administration caused to international treaties and international relationships.”
The nations of Britain, France, Germany and Italy all elected heads of government who were friendly to George Bush and to the United States during the Bush administration.
What international treaty was “damaged,” and how?
Iran did not develop a nuclear weapon on Bush’s watch. Let us see whether Obama can say the same when his time is done.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
The nations of Britain, France, Germany and Italy all elected heads of government who were friendly to George Bush and to the United States during the Bush administration.
_____________________________________
France and Germany would have nothing to do with the attack on Iraq, and the supposed ‘coalition of the willing’. Italy almost immediately voted the Bush-supporting goverment out of power.
And yes, Iran did develop its nuclear facilities under the watchful eye of George Bush – including one we find out the only purpose for it was producing materials for nuclear weapons.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
“Iran did develop its nuclear facilities under the watchful eye of George Bush – including one we find out the only purpose for it was producing materials for nuclear weapons.”
It did not develop a nuclear weapon. Let us see if Obama can make the same claim when his time is up.
If you think the fact that this, that or the other nation did not join us in a war means that relations with them were not good, you are miserably immature. Japan didn’t join us. Taiwan didn’t join us. Colombia didna’t join us. So what?
Relations with Britain, France, Germany and Italy were excellent during the Bush administration, and their peoples elected governments friendly to us. Relations with the UK are falling apart during this amateurs’s presidency; Iran mocks and defies him; Putin has sized him up as a weakling; and Sarkozy holds him in comtempt. And he’s only been in office ten months–or is it eight?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
“Len you do understand what an international treaty is right? And international relationships.
And p.s. – Len – do you think Iran’s nuclear facilities suddenly sprang up in the past 9 months? Guess what, they didn’t – they were started and progressed under Bush’s watchful eye.”
Tiera-
Good to see that your second response was on point.
As to the first, do I ‘understand’? You have a point, that in any way actually relates to ‘international relations’ or ‘international treaties’? I doubt anyone here cares what you or I ‘understand’ in general; they are likely more interested in specifics. That was simply a vacuous sentence lacking any real information. Do you understand nuclear physics? Who cares?
As to the second, you are putting words in my mouth. I’ll make my own statements, thank you. Meanwhile, you are free to argue with yourself as you wish. There is simply no question that the Iranians were subdued at lease until the liberal attacks on Bush that undermined our war on terrorism gained traction, and truly blossomed over the last year. Yet, Obama is not satisfied- he is now attempting to place terrorists like OBL in the category of ‘criminal’ who must be mirandized and provided an attorney the moment he is apprehended by the military. Pat Leahey says it’s OK because we don’t need to interrogate him to get a conviction, as if OBL has nothing to say about Al Qaeda tactics, resources, personnel, communications, resources, etc. Holder is so deep in conflicts of interest on this issue that he can’t even give a coherent explanation for his decision beyond a demonstrably insane protocol that results in a multi-million dollar bonanza for his former law firm with which he still negotiating compensation. And all you can suggest is some strawman argument that completely misses the incredibly serious bungling that threatens the future of our nation? Incredible how petty the mind can be.
Posted by: Len Johnson | November 19, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
There is simply no question that the Iranians were subdued at lease until the liberal attacks on Bush that undermined our war on terrorism gained traction, and truly blossomed over the last year.
___________________________________
President Bush’s approval ratings hit lows below 30%, it was not just ‘liberals’ who refused to support him.
And yes, as we now find out, nuclear facilities were developed in Iran on George Bush’s watch – whose sole purpose was to provide raw material for nuclear weapons. So, the myth about Bush ‘containing’ Iran is just that – if Obama had allowed that the right would be calling for him to be hung as a traitor. But no, it wasn’t Obama – it was Bush.
p.s. – the same can be said about North Korea – who conducted a nuclear test on George Bush’s watch.
Under Bush’s rule almost 60% of the world felt they could not trust the United States to do the right thing. That has now dropped to 30%.
People didn’t trust Bush, Cheney or their administration.
Your attempts to paint the current President in a certain way are typical fear and smear campaigns – always launched by the right wing and the Republicans.
We’ve seen it all before. Americans are largely tired of it.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
“Italy almost immediately voted the Bush-supporting goverment out of power.”
We began the liberation of Iraq in March, 2003. Silvio Berlusconi remained Prime Minister for more than three years thereafer (until May, 2006) and was re-elected in May, 2008.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
We began the liberation of Iraq in March, 2003. Silvio Berlusconi remained Prime Minister for more than three years thereafer (until May, 2006) and was re-elected in May, 2008.
____________________________________
Berlusconi was booted out of office for supporting Bush in Iraq.
“The liberation of Iraq” . . my how you buy into the propaganda. It was an attack on Iraq and it killed tens of thousands of Iraqis, many women and children, many civilians . … and maimed tens of thousands more. Destroyed vast amounts of infrastructure.
Sure wish someone would come and ‘liberate’ us in that way. Wouldn’t we be be thankful. Hussein was hung for killing approximately 130 people after an assassination attempt on his life – we killed tens of thousands – who should be hung for that?
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
“It was an attack on Iraq and it killed tens of thousands of Iraqis, many women and children, many civilians . ..”
The liberation of France was an attack on France and it killed tens of thousands of French people, many women and children, many civilians…
You said that the Italians voted the government out “almost immediately” after the attack on Iraq, yet it was more than three years later. Why do you insist on doing things like that?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
“we killed tens of thousands – who should be hung for that?”
If you’re talking about France, I guess FDR should have been hung. In the case of Japan, probably Truman. Right?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
It takes one who willfully intends to deceive to say only that Hussein was hung for the particular crime of which he was convicted, which was sufficient for the verdict and judgment, and make no mention of his far more ghastly crimes. No one disputes that he was responsible for innumerable other murders, one example of which is the following:
“The worst human rights abuses of Hussein’s tenure took place during the genocidal al-Anfal Campaign (1986-1989), in which Hussein’s administration called for the extermination of every living thing–human or animal–in certain regions of the Kurdish north. All told, some 182,000 people–men, women, and children–were slaughtered, many through use of chemical weapons.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 19, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
You said that the Italians voted the government out “almost immediately” after the attack on Iraq
____________________________________
Yes, the first chance they had . ..
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
The liberation of France was an attack on France and it killed tens of thousands of French people, many women and children, many civilians…
__________________________________
France was invade by Germany.
Iraq was invaded by the United States.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
It takes one who willfully intends to deceive to say only that Hussein was hung for the particular crime of which he was convicted
_____________________________________
That is the fact.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
“The worst human rights abuses of Hussein’s tenure took place during the genocidal al-Anfal Campaign (1986-1989), in which Hussein’s administration called for the extermination of every living thing–human or animal–in certain regions of the Kurdish north. All told, some 182,000 people–men, women, and children–were slaughtered, many through use of chemical weapons.”
______________________________________
This act took place in a time of war – the same as the firebombing of 67 Japanese cities and the incineration to death of hundreds of thousands of Japanese also took place during a time of war.
You will also remember the United States (under Reagan) was supplying support for Hussein during that time. Now we’re indignant – then we supported him.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
…’not in the immediate gratification business’
Was Obama saying this in reference to Afghanistan?
Was he saying it in reference to the clear solution of cutting the bureaucratic red tape to release the stranglehold on our economy?
It seems there is a pattern, that we all saw while Obama was in the Senate before he was elected, that he has extreme difficulty making decisions. From voting “present” on controversial Senate votes, to his slowness to support our troops at Ft. Hood, to his dodging of answers during his presidential campaign (ie. answering a question with: “it’s above my pay grade” at the Saddleback forum).
Posted by: EPU | November 19, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
…’not in the immediate gratification business’
_____________________________________
Yeah, he should have cured all the world’s ills in 10 months.
If the Republicans were in there, they could fix everything with one snap of their blessed fingers.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Instead Obama has quadrupled our deficit in only 10 months and plans on doing more ‘stimulating’ of our economy.
Posted by: EPU | November 19, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Obama is a walking contradiction.
He claims he’s a man of ‘no immediate gratification’ – a tempered, well thoughtful man who weighs all the arguments first, consults with all the opposing factions, listens to every argument, and patiently, prayerfully, painstakingly, and prudently presents his thoughtful, temperate, and wise decision to the world.
This is the man he only dreams of being. In his first 10 months of office goes on a rampage taking over the car industry, radically increasing our debt, and if he has his way taking over he health industry.
But he’s a good speech giver.
Posted by: EPU | November 19, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Instead Obama has quadrupled our deficit in only 10 months and plans on doing more ‘stimulating’ of our economy.
______________________________________
Nonsense. This fiscal year runs from October 2008 to October 2009.
$1.2 Trillion dollars was already written into the 2009 budget by the time Obama took office.
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
tierra,
Let’s all worship at the altar of the “Party god”. The world is not D vs R. I’m not even a Republican, so your stereotyping of my criticisms of Obama are classic broadbrushing of opposing viewpoints.
But I can see where some people are trapped inside the 1 dimensional box of D-R. It’s not about parties. Let’s put America first for once and give less attention to the glorified idols of D and R.
Posted by: EPU | November 19, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Some of us do our math outside of government time – that is real time. Time to quit the government and get a real job.
Posted by: EPU | November 19, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
I think Mr. AxelRod has again skewed viewpoints to his desire. He forgot that Mr. Obama was made to look like he will turn water into bread, bread into wine, and then wine back to water when he was running during the election.
Posted by: young_voter | November 19, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
I’m not even a Republican, so your stereotyping of my criticisms of Obama are classic broadbrushing of opposing viewpoint
___________________________________
Never said you were a Republican. I responded to your criticism of the President by saying . .
“Yeah, he should have cured all the world’s ills in 10 months.
“If the Republicans were in there, they could fix everything with one snap of their blessed fingers.”
Posted by: tierra | November 19, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Under Obama’s first budget, the federal deficit would quadruple to 12.3% of GDP due to the passing of his first stimulus of $787 billion dollars and his rescue of the banking system. Let’s not forget his rescue of GM. He also promised unemployment would not exceed 9% and here we are in double digits.
Oh but yes, the In box is empty, the Outbox is empty, and the Blame Bush box is full. Bush increased government and spending, we all understand that. But do we have to go through this perpetual cycle of, “well . . . Bush did it too!”
Come on. Enough already, let’s work for America not for the Political Party god, for Pete’s sake!
Posted by: EPU | November 19, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
He also promised unemployment would not exceed 9% and here we are in double digits.
_____________________________________
Obama promised no such thing.
And the reason people bring up the Bush administration is because Bush increased the national debt by an average of $500 BILLION dollars EVERY year he was in power – and that was during the ‘good time’ when we could possibly have saved money or paid down the debt.
Instead the national debt was doubled, so that when the economy crashed and burned at the end of Bush, 700,000 jobs were being lost in a month, stock market fell hugely, bankruptcies and foreclosures skyrocketed – what was left to lean on? Nothing but a double national debt owed to China.
Every western industrialized country went through an extreme economic downturn and all instituted stimulus funding, tax cuts and deficit funding.
Obama said it early and often – getting out of this mess is not going to be easy or quick – and things might get worse before they get better.
Nobody is out of the hot water – nobody.
Posted by: tierra | November 20, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am
The worst human rights abuses of Hussein’s tenure…..
Posted by: Fascist Hyena
glad that Rumsfeld bowed to him and Reagan supported and supplied him
Posted by: iupui | November 20, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Hell, this White House is not even in the “Long Term Gratification Business”. In fact they wouldn’t know a properly run business if it bit them in the arse.
Posted by: capnjack | November 20, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
In fact they wouldn’t know a properly run business if it bit them in the arse.
Posted by: capnjack
business people eh? seems the Bushies were going to bring all their ‘adult’ corporate and business ‘expertise’ to the government… how’d that work out….. gimme a break
Posted by: iupui | November 20, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am
business people eh? seems the Bushies were going to bring all their ‘adult’ corporate and business ‘expertise’ to the government… how’d that work out….. gimme a break
Posted by: iupui
*********************
Actually it worked out a hell of a lot better then what’s happening right now. If all you can use to defend Obama is the “blame Bush” rant, you failed.
Posted by: capnjack | November 20, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Nonsense. This fiscal year runs from October 2008 to October, 2009.
Posted by: tierra
***************
Obama wash, Obama’s fiscal year started the day he took office in January 2009 and the Democrat congress’ fiscal year started in January, 2007. Responsibility starts at the changing of the watch.
Posted by: capnjack | November 20, 2009, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Okay, apparently I’m dealing with a lawyer here.
Obama PROJECTED that unemployment would not exceed 8.5%. Better?
Posted by: EPU | November 20, 2009, 2:17 am 2:17 am
This could explain some things about Obama: He graduated from Columbia University, where he majored in political science and specialized in international relations. He then graduated from Harvard Law School. After law school, he worked as a community organizer and a civil rights lawyer in Chicago.
Reminds me of a couple of jokes I know:
What do you call a lawyer gone bad?
Senator.
What’s wrong with lawyer jokes?
Lawyers don’t think they’re funny and other people don’t think they’re jokes.
Posted by: EPU | November 20, 2009, 2:31 am 2:31 am
Obama wash, Obama’s fiscal year started the day he took office in January 2009
_______________________________________
Nonsense. Not true at all. By the time Obama took office there was already $1.2 trillion of a deficit projected for fiscal year 2009.
Posted by: tierra | November 20, 2009, 2:35 am 2:35 am
If all you can use to defend Obama is the “blame Bush” rant, you failed.
Posted by: capnjack
actually, It’s Bush that failed..
why is it that no one on the ‘right’ dares to admit that things were pretty bad when Bush left office economically, and that he left 2 wars unresolved, and did this over 8 years….
now.. the right wants Obama to clean up the mess left by Bush et. al. in less than a year…
sort of like saying my car looked really good before I totaled my car when I crashed into you, now, fix my car before the end of the day
gimme a break….
Posted by: iupui | November 20, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am
Obama PROJECTED that unemployment would not exceed 8.5%. Better?
_______________________________
That is not true either. If you look at the report itself, the authors made a specific point to clearly state that the figures they used were NOT meant to be predictions, nor to be used as exact figures. They acknowledged the unusual nature of this recession because its fundamental causes and it’s severity.
Posted by: tierra | November 20, 2009, 2:44 am 2:44 am
If all you can use to defend Obama is the “blame Bush” rant, you failed.
____________________________________
Not at all, when a current President is under attack it is entirely appropriate to compare that person’s performance with previous occupants of the office – particularly the most recent.
The Bush Republicans failed miserably on protecting the American economy.
Posted by: tierra | November 20, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am
a timely little history lesson for the villagers who evidently were in some sort of giddy state during the Bush years and think that Obama came into office with peace and prosperity instead of a smoking wreck of an economy and 2 wars
Posted by: how soon they forget | November 20, 2009, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Let’s see….
Played by the Chinese? Check.
Played by the North Koreans? Check.
Played by the Iranians? Check.
Played by the OAS? Check.
Played by the Russians? Check.
Hmmm…so who’s left for Obama kowtow and inevitably crumble before? Weak administration. Absolutely weak. And no, it is possible to be diplomatic and not a chump (although good luck explaining that to the administration).
Posted by: James | November 20, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Obama PROJECTED that unemployment would not exceed 8.5%. Better?
_______________________________
That is not true either. If you look at the report itself, the authors made a specific point to clearly state that the figures they used were NOT meant to be predictions, nor to be used as exact figures. They acknowledged the unusual nature of this recession because its fundamental causes and it’s severity.
Posted by: tierra
******************
Yes it is true, in fact Obama showed a graph and said unless we passed the bill immediately we would go over 8% and if we passed it we would stay below 8%. You really need to stop defending the indefensible. Obama is failing miserably and you continue to defend him. Why? Are you one of those that gets a tingle?
Posted by: capnjack | November 20, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am
There is no exuse low or lame enough that Obama, his administration and his followers won’t use. These people are rank amateurs, and if they think they’re buying time by implying we’re into “instant gratification,” they’re wrong. It’s always been juvenile to blame a predecessor, but is constantly used by Democrats as a deflection strategy. Real leaders don’t do that.
Posted by: Catherine | November 20, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
the worlds greatest community organizer, doing all he knows to do, waffle, wimper, and beg the boss man for table scraps. Doesn’t look all that great, when you’re POTUS, Barry. God help us, 3 more years of this idiot.
Posted by: was_a_Dem | November 20, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
indeed “was a dem”, this ill-advised, ametuer, leftist, anti-capitalist socialist is doing his very best to destroy all that America ever was,,, is it intentional, or is he that ignorant of how the world actually works?
Posted by: GI Joe | November 20, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Obamas solutions:
Economy: Lets take more money from the taxpayers, give it to government hacks, let the government hacks take half of it, and then hand the rest back to the taxpayers, and call it “Stimulus”! Sounds logical right? Tiera?
International Relations: Lets kiss every tyrants ####, bow before everyone, and tell everyone how bad America has been, and never mention the real atrocities of all the countries he is visiting. Iran is flicking him off, Russia is flicking him off, China is flicking him off, and Cuba is patting him on the head and telling him he is doing a “great job”, while Obama blushes. Awwww shucks…
Sounds logical right? Tiera?
Corruption: Promising to end corruption in government Obama hires hundreds of people who have broken tax laws, have worked for bailed out companies, have expressed admiration for Marxism, Communism, Fascism, and Socialism, and get tons of cash from the companies they rail against (obviousley the railing is for the lib sheep)
Posted by: Obamunism | November 20, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
The trip was about building relationships — trust and finding common ground and solutions to world problems…, now that we have become so Interdepedent….
It makes no good sense for anyone to oppose healthcare reform. It seems some are more worried about Insurance companies being crowded out due to competition and lower costs than the Health of the people, some who will surely die. Some are more concerned for the bottomline of the Insurance Companies than the small businesses (who they Pretend to care about) who have to pay high premiums for their employees, forcing some out of business, some to offer no health insurance, or some to set up shop elsewhere other than the United States! And why do we have so many kinds of crises in this country????
It is too bad that we have a certain group — the Party of No and Fear — who are Advocates of Can’t, Won’t, Shouldn’t, Distortion, Fear, Hatred and Divisiveness. They are a dark group, a bitter group. For too long we have been spoon-fed a bunch of lies and fears by these powers who want to immobilize us, paralyze us and confuse us and to keep us circling the Yellow Brick Road! Again, why do we have so many crises in this country???
And, It is a sad fact that the Afghanistan War is also a false war and a false choice. These terrorists do not stay in one place or in one country, they are all over. We are not at war with any one country, this is a fallacy. WE are in a “struggle” with an ideology, yes or evil, yes, but we are not at war with any country. Since, we have terrorists in our own country who are not Muslims, does this make us at war with the United States?
OH, if we only had a Brain….., Courage….., Heart/LOVE!
Posted by: Angellight | November 20, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Obama PROJECTED that unemployment would not exceed 8.5%. Better?
_______________________________
That is not true either. If you look at the report itself, the authors made a specific point to clearly state that the figures they used were NOT meant to be predictions, nor to be used as exact figures. They acknowledged the unusual nature of this recession because its fundamental causes and it’s severity.
Posted by: tierra
******************
Yes it is true, in fact Obama showed a graph and said unless we passed the bill immediately we would go over 8% and if we passed it we would stay below 8%. You really need to stop defending the indefensible. Obama is failing miserably and you continue to defend him. Why? Are you one of those that gets a tingle?
__________________________________
Read the report, you might learn something. And quite spreading lies.
Posted by: tierra | November 20, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
indeed “was a dem”, this ill-advised, ametuer, leftist, anti-capitalist socialist is doing his very best to destroy all that America ever was,,, is it intentional, or is he that ignorant of how the world actually works?
____________________________________
Another disciple of the Fearmonger-in-Chief. Read the Anti-Defamation League piece.
Posted by: tierra | November 20, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Not in the immediate gratification business?
Then why are you on a rampage taking over the car industry, the health industry, and throwing all of our money around with bailouts, stimulus packages, etc. – all in less than 10 months?
You can fool some of the people all of the time, you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.
Posted by: Chains we can believe in | November 22, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
What is so immediately apparent to me is that we are being shown over and over again that the US is no longer the top dog. Economically we are a crispy critter, and we lost the moral high ground as a consequence of the Bush administration. I think allaying with Israel over Iran is going to ruin us even more than we are already ruined, and I can’t blame China, one of Iran’s foremost trade partners, for not backing an embargo! Duh!
This is the new post Bush world – better get used to it, and do yourself a big favor and if you have them, put your cowboy fantasies away.
Posted by: Xtina | November 23, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
Then why are you on a rampage taking over..
Posted by: Chains we can believe in
seems you are an expert on economics, please elaborate on what you would have done from the point Obama took office on 1/20/09 to fix the economy, and end the 2 wars
Posted by: Here goes it | November 23, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Axelrod claims “solid progress on climate change” ?
Hey, how ’bout them Hadly/CRU e-mails that were linked out from the Russian Server???
Heard University of East Anglia confirmed their system had been hacked and changed all of their passwords.
Best part “Mike’s Nature Tricks” to “hide the decline”. Way to go Micheal Mann!!!!! Hypocrite!!!!! Scientific heretic!
Hope his funding dries up:)
Posted by: Buddy | November 23, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm