By Dschabner

Dec 15, 2009 12:01am

Biden Updates Obama on Recovery Act Investments in Clean Energy Projects

ABC News' Karen Travers reports:

President Obama will be in Copenhagen on Friday for climate change talks and Vice President Biden has given him some reading material for the flight over.

The White House has released a memo that Biden presented to the president outlining ways that funding from the administration’s $787 billion Recovery Act funding is making progress for toward a cleaner, more energy efficient economy. The report details ways that stimulus funds have been used toward advances in renewable energy, energy grid modernization, home energy efficiency projects and green automobiles.

“I’m pleased to report that the administration is laying the foundation for a clean energy economy that will create a new generation of jobs, reduce dependence on oil and enhance national security,” Biden begins his memo to Obama. “Through the Recovery Act and more effective use of programs already in existence, the administration is taking the critical steps to transform the United States into a global clean energy leader.”

Over $80 billion from the Recovery Act has been invested in clean energy technology, which the Obama Administration says is “the largest single investment in clean energy in U.S. history.” The administration says that investment will produce $150 billion in clean energy projects

Obama heads to a Home Depot store in Northern Virginia on Tuesday to discuss how energy saving home projects help the economy with labor, manufacturing, and small business leaders. On Wednesday, Biden will talk about clean energy and the manufacturing industry at a Middle Class Task Force event on Wednesday.

Below are examples from Biden’s report, where the administration says it has made progress on clean energy projects as a result of Recovery Act investments:

Renewable Energy: The U.S. is on-track to double renewable energy generation, including solar, wind and geothermal, and double renewable manufacturing capacity in just three years because of Recovery Act investments.

Vehicles and Fuels of the Future: Over the next six years, three new electric vehicles plants—the first ever in the U.S.—and 30 new battery plants will be fully operational because of the Administration’s $16 billion investment in plug-in hybrids, all-electric vehicles and the infrastructure needed to power them, as well as new clean fuels. When President Obama took office there were just 2 advanced battery and electric drive component factories in the U.S.

Grid Modernization: Twenty-six million smart meters will be installed in U.S. homes by 2013 – more than triple the number currently in service – as a result of the Administration’s $4 billion Recovery Act investment in a smart energy grid and the one-to-one match in private sector funding. This technology allows consumers to monitor and regulate their own energy usage and costs.

Energy Efficiency: Because the Administration is making the largest single investment in home energy efficiency in U.S history through the Recovery Act and other initiatives, nearly one million home energy efficiency retrofits will have happened by 2012.

Carbon Capture: Because of Recovery Act funding and existing loan guarantee authority, there will be 5 commercial scale power plants operating with large carbon capture sequestration facilities by 2015. When President Obama took office, there were zero.

Science and Innovation: Through the Recovery Act, the Administration is investing $400 million in some of the most advanced research in wind, solar, and geothermal technologies through the ARPA-E program to make these clean sources of energy more affordable and easier to store and transport. A year ago, this critical program was unfunded.

User Comments

Forget Copenhagen, most of these investments will help reduce America’s dependence on imported oil. Tough to find a problem with that.

Posted by: jhw539 | December 15, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Now, if they would add offshore drilling, natural gas, coal and nuclear to the mix, we would lessen our dependence on foreign oil much more quickly.
“Green” is such a misnomer. If we took away CO2 the plants would die, no green at all.
More CO2 means:
More Plant Growth
Plants need less water
More food per acre
More robust habitats and ecosystems
CO2 is Earth’s greatest airborne fertilizer. Without it – No Life On Earth! No Green!

Posted by: The Audacity of Copenhagen | December 15, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am

These green investments are always overlooked by the backwards-looking, empty of ideas, do-nothing GOP and their echo chambers who thrive on sounding like idiots when it comes to human-driven CO2 emissions and anything to do with global warming, clean air, clean water and public health. I applaud our Democratic administration and Dems in Congress for making these investments. Baby steps toward a truly progressive future.

Posted by: Don't EVER want to go back to the GOP-driven dark ages! | December 15, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Nothing good can come of that smart grid.
Why is it anyone’s business “what” I use electrisity for? It isn’t.
All this is, is a way for dear government to charge us more. Especially now since some brilliant brain child deemed carbon dioxide a pollutant.

Posted by: Kate | December 15, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Nothing good can come of that smart grid.
___
Unsurprising.
The Republicans and anti-government tea party “populists” are bankrupt of ideas and have a true do-nothing, anti-intellectual mentality.
We lost them at the word “smart.”

Posted by: Don't EVER want to go back to the GOP-driven dark ages! | December 15, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

We lost them at the word “smart.”
==========
It isn’t the word “smart” that’s the problem.
It’s the government using the word “smart” that sends up the red flag. When the government uses a word that seems undeniably positive, you know there’s a zinger headed your way. Like “Patriot”.

Posted by: MayBee | December 15, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

So professor dark ages….why is it anyones business what I use electrisity for?

Posted by: Kate | December 15, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

When Deputy Dawg (Biden) talk, people laugh.. How thats stimulus working for ya LMAO

Posted by: welcome to Obamaville,the fastest growing homeless community | December 15, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Yes we need to do something about global warming but we need to keep the American values that made this country. I have been sealing leaks, adding insulation and storm window to my home for the last four years. I have done this with my own money and not my fellow tax payers money. I beleive the Obama administration takes a dislike to the fable “The Little Red Hen”. They seem to push the concept of not taking action until the government determines that it’s time to pay you to take action. If you take action before the goverment decides to pay you then you are over paying. In keeping with this practice I should stop eating healthy and exercising until they offer me money to eat healthy and excercise.

Posted by: Charles | December 15, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

If AGW is real and the science is conclusive we should be afraid, right?
Based on what Al Gore and the IPCC scientists say, no measures we take to stop CO2 emissions could possibly be too draconian, right?
So why haven’t we put a stop to unnessary travel? Why not put a limit on how far one can travel for vacation, or even work?
Why not ban NASCAR? Why not create laws that force people to live in smaller dwellings? Why not make heated pools for example illegal?
Every time I pose these questions to my Liberal friends I am told they are too ‘draconian’ but if the science is done and we are headed for doomsday then how can ANY measure be too draconian?
My Liberal friends have NO PROBLEM living in large houses, drive expensive foreign cars, and travel to the other side of the planet for their vacations.
The only logical conclusion one can come to is that these people (including Al Gore) do NOT really believe in AGW.
Small wonder why people are SKEPTICAL. After all if the IPCC can hold conferences every year from Bali to Copenhagen one has to wonder if they even believe what they preach.

Posted by: Denbo | December 15, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Posted by: The Audacity of Copenhagen | Dec 15, 2009 8:29:47 AM
I see you got your daycare degree in science.

Posted by: tierra | December 15, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Biden and Obama, what a team.Reminds me of another comedy team,Abbot and Costello.

Posted by: Johnny L | December 15, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

So, Joe – buddy…what about those jobs?
Remember when you and Pelosi told us that we had to get this passed and had to do it darn quick so we don’t fall off the brink? The President said it too. He was pretty sure that if the Bill got passed that Caterpillar could avoid laying off so many people because it was going to super charge their business coming right out of the box. (oops – that was a tad over stating the case as it turns out)
All of this is great and we are all happy and jumping for joy – but, the Bill was about spending our money to create jobs.
Give us an update on how the Bill is creating jobs, Mr. Vice President.

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 15, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.