Bush Administration Claimed Success When Public Stopped Shoe-bomber
Interestingly, this notion that the government can claim success when an aspiring terrorist proceeds through airport security, boards a plane with explosives, and is only stopped because of his own incompetence and a vigilant public, is not new to the Obama administration.
In a press conference on January 17, 2002, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft made a similar claim about shoe-bomber Richard Reid.
“Throughout the war on terrorism, our military and intelligence officials have made a concerted effort to share appropriate information with the public in order to enlist their assistance,” Ashcroft said. “We've asked citizens to be vigilant, to be alert to any possible threat. The success of this strategy was made clear by yesterday's indictment of Richard Reid, who may very well have succeeded in destroying American Airlines Flight Number 63, as the indictment charges, had it not been for the courage and attentiveness of the citizen passengers and crew.”
Napolitano’s predecessor as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Tom Ridge, went on MSNBC’s Hardball on September 10, 2002, where host Chris Matthews asked him if the US government had thwarted any terrorist attacks within the US.
“You can't measure that success,” Ridge said, “because it's difficult to determine with an organization that's so decentralized.”
Matthews suggested that such success could in fact be measured “if you catch a guy about to blow up a building” or “you catch a guy moving a car bomb into an area of their building.”
“Because of the vigilance of some citizens, we certainly have gotten some folks on airplanes, shoe bombers,” Ridge said.
“We”?
– jpt

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
amazing how quiet it can get in here when rightwing talking points are skewered…
Posted by: XX | December 28, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Jake is on board with the new standard . “Well Bush did it ” .Gitmo open , troops all over the world , about to start a new war in Yemen , and all we hear is Bush did it . Not hopey and changey .
Posted by: nat turner | December 28, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
The lack of shame in government officials knows no party or wing. And this doesn’t invalidate the criticism, anyway.
Posted by: Buzz Killington | December 28, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Janet Incompetano is a right winger? Who knew?
Posted by: Plumber | December 28, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
What Ashcroft said was a far cry from what Incompetano said…she should be fired immediately…but nice try Jake.
Posted by: RBR | December 28, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
……. didn’t Bush also claim success in Iraq?? No….. wait…… that was “mission accomplished”. My bad!!
Posted by: stone | December 28, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
And this is news how? This is a disappointing post.
Posted by: Patrick Courrielche | December 28, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
XX, what “rightwing talking points” are you talking about?
If a terrorist gets on a plane with explosives and has to be stopped by civilian passengers or flight attendants, that is by definition a failure of security.
It was a failure that the shoe bomber got on a plane and now we all have to take off our shoes. I truly hope we do not have to fly “commando” from now on…
Posted by: The Audacity of Copenhagen | December 28, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
What a ridiculous post. ‘Bush did it, so we can too. Nanee, nanee boo-boo’. It’s time to grow up and talk about defeating terrorists and jihad!
Posted by: Kathy Durrett | December 28, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Stupid is Stupid, doesn’t matter which administration said it.
Posted by: JvB | December 28, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
i’ve got no response to what bush did or said other than 2 wrongs don’t make a right! the big difference between the right wing tea partiers and the left wingers is that we didn’t blindly follow bush and defend every action he took.
napoleano instinctually tried to spin the story to make the WH look good, plan and simple. when it turned out how stupid her spin was, she tried to change it. when bush did it, i could admit it, left wingers are incapable of admiting anything wrong done by the new WH.
And by the way, if bush was really so bad, why do you accept when obama does the same thing?? wasn’t he supposed to be better than bush?
Posted by: RightWinger | December 28, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Proud of you Jake for digging out the pieces of history on the Bush administration’s response on a very similar bombing attempt – the ‘shoe bomber’ incident.
It’s factual reporting, and the implication is left to the reader to figure out.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Can’t remember Bush (or Clinton)blaming the president before him in virtually every speech.
Or apologozing for America in every speech overseas.
Maybe it’s Obama’s thin skin.
Posted by: larry | December 28, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
At least Bush had the guts to call Muslim fanatics “terrorist”.
Obama is too afraid he will lose popularity around the world–since he’s already blown it here.
Posted by: hank | December 28, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Jake, didn’t you get the memo: AQ says this was in retaliation for Obama’s strikes on Yemen.
He OWNS this.
In fact, he has approved more predator attacks in 11 months than Bush used in 8 years!
Stop covering for him; he’s a warmonger!
Posted by: Linda Eaton | December 28, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Can’t remember Bush (or Clinton)blaming the president before him in virtually every speech.
___________________________________
Neither of those presidents left the country in the shape Bush left it in. Bush earned it.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Bush had to fight for any ounce of success. He didn’t have the luxury of having all of the MSM and three major networks covering his back.
Posted by: millie | December 28, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Bush had to fight for any ounce of success.
_________________________________
Yes, but the failures came easy.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Well the soon to be obamatrons criticized him at the time, so time to blame the obamatron’s messiah.
Posted by: jonny | December 28, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
So, how is Obama much different from Bush?
- Guantanamo still open
- Detainees continue to be held at Bagram Air Base
- Rendition, wiretapping, use of Presidential privilege, etc. still occurring
- Housing foreclosures continue
- Iran and N. Korea continue on paths towards nuclear proliferation
- Banks and big business continue to receive government bailouts
But in some ways Obama has managed to “out-Bush” Bush:
- Conflict in Afghanistan has escalated
- (MUCH!!!) higher deficits than any Bush incurred, MUCH HIGHER runaway spending
- The country that is MORE divided than when Bush was in office (ironic since Obama was “the one” who was going to “bring us all together”
- Obama’s “strongly disapprove” ratings are higher now than they were when Bush left office
- Unemployment now measured in double-digits
- It appears the charm offensive Obama employed hasn’t improved our standing in the world anymore than when Bush was in office (Muslim jihadists still bent on our destruction, Chavez calls out Obama in Copenhagen, etc., etc., etc.)
So, not much “change” from my perspective, nor from that of many thinking and objective liberals (e.g., Danny Glover) who see Obama as not any different from his predecessor…
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Change We Can Believe In!
- Attributed to 0bama (although the Greatest Philosopher and Admirer of his friend Secretary of propaganda, Mao, said “Revolution We Can Believe In!)
Our Greatest Smartest Clueless Leader will point out that he has ordered a full review of his policies, excuse, Bush policies that he inherited. He will “Change” that incompetent Prez’s rules, now that a terrorist, excuse, a loner, has shown to him what they are capable of. He will point out Bush was so incompetent, only went so fart to take your shoes off. Contrary, our GSCL ordered to fully pat down passenger crouch, to feel foreign objects, definitely for your safety, to prevent this from ever happening again. He is not reacting, he is changing, of course, like it will make a real difference.
Furthermore, Bush is known for nepotism – remember those Brownies?; our GSCL, of course, is known for change, for putting his “competent” friends in important positions. His friend Secretary in charge of his party allowed anyone to walk into his White House and shake hands and picture with him. His supporter Secretary in charge of your security says “We’re ascertaining why it was that he was not flagged in a more specific way when he purchased his ticket, given the information that we think was available, allegedly was available,”. ALLEGEDLY??? Of course, she will need a 12 person committee to decide it was true before she is convinced such public information that she thinks was available was available.
Posted by: huh | December 28, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Well the soon to be obamatrons criticized him at the time, so time to blame the obamatron’s messiah.
__________________________________
No they didn’t.
Bush was receiving tremendous public support at this time (December 2001 – ‘shoe bomber’) from all sides of the spectrum. The Democrats had the decency to rally behind the president in those times.
Unfortunately the Enron scandal also broke at this time, and with Bush’s upcoming decision to attack Iraq, his popularity began to erode.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Bush was so successful Obama has decided to keep many of his policies in place.
The ones that work Obama takes credit.
The ones that fail Obama blames Bush.
Posted by: mick | December 28, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
When Obama brags endlessly about his life experiences and Muslim ties I guess he thought AlQaeda would be impressed.
It kind of backfired.
Obama probably looks more like a sellout. I bet that infuriates AlQaeda.
Posted by: kyle | December 28, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Tapper, I know I’m splitting hairs a little, but there is a difference between saying “we depend on the vigilance of our citizens” and “everything went according to plan.”
Ashcroft and Ridge were more of a diplomatic phew. Napolitano was a gaffe, clearly.
Posted by: Dan | December 28, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Bush was so successful Obama has decided to keep many of his policies in place.
____________________________________
Any smart person would keep the things that work, and discard the things that don’t.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
There is no similarity between Napolitano’s comments and Ashcroft’s. He simply said that their attempt to encourage citizen vigilance was successful in the Reid case. He made no claim that “the system” worked.
Napolitano’s comments about the system working is far more comprehensive in what she claimed worked. She later corrected herself from an obviously insane comment made on Sunday. Also, I know this is tedious, but Ashcroft was speaking 3 months after 9/11, when the USG was still working to build a security system whereas Napolitano is speaking 8 years later with many years of experience in dealing with AQ.
Tapper, I think you over reached.
Posted by: richardb | December 28, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Credit was given to the brave citizens who stopped the shoe bomber…I don’t get it? This is certainly stretching a point.
Posted by: claire | December 28, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Jake shows his true colors-he’s no different than any of the other MSM journalists. Sadly.
Posted by: Kate | December 28, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Napolitano’s comments about the system working is far more comprehensive in what she claimed worked.
___________________________________
The ‘system’ worked in the sense that civilian vigilance is a crucial part of the system – as Ashcroft indicated.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
“We”?
Yes, Jake, “we” as in “we the people.” You know, Jake. The way President Obama wanted us to put aside our petty differences and unite as a country? And since then has done little if anything to bring us together.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 28, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
november 2010
Posted by: catman | December 28, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Hardly the same, Jake!
That was 7 years ago — with none of the tools we have in place now (all failed, BTW).
Posted by: Chris B | December 28, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
“Bush was so successful Obama has decided to keep many of his policies in place. The ones that work Obama takes credit. The ones that fail Obama blames Bush.”
Obama has already claimed that his primary accomplishment during his first year was “bringing back the economy from the brink.” Guess who laid the foundation for this accomplishment? G.W. Bush and his TARP plan (although many conservatives – including this one – disagree with the reach and scope of the plan).
Obama is like Bush in many ways…in fact he manages to “out-Bush Bush” in many areas: Spending, growth of government, straining relations with allies, etc.
Great job, Barry!
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
“The system” wasn’t flawless then and it’s not flawless now. And when Tapper mocked the use of the word “we”, he did it because the authorities used it in the exclusive sense to refer to “the system” at airport security, whereas the “we” responsible for thwarting the attacks were the public, not the designated security agents. Both Ashcroft and Naplitano made misleading statements.
And stop blaming Obama for blaming Bush. He’s mentioned only rarely that he inherited a couple of major problems and never referred to Bush by name. Whatever weaknesses there are in Obama or his administration, he’s never gone on egomaniacal rants or lost his temper.
Posted by: Robert Maxwell | December 28, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
WHAT? Bush claimed success for the shoe bomber so it’s OK for Obama to claim success because the detonator didn’t work? When is Obama going to declare mission accomplished.?
Posted by: CW | December 28, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Sadly too many are looking to the government to protect them and falling in stride to those that claim it’s the government only that should protect them. It’s the hard working Americans that have made America great. And it’s those that look to be government to succor them that is tearing it apart. So the President is absolutely correct to say that people should be vigilant; at least those that won’t blame the government of failure to do its duty.
Posted by: TX_MBell | December 28, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
And since then has done little if anything to bring us together.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It’s Sat Night!
you can clearly blame the rightwing and Republicans for that, even as far back as the campaign for the presidency, the constant attempts to demonize Obama as a foreigner hit new lows even for the insane right wing hate machine.
Posted by: Oh Say, Can You See? | December 28, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
When is Obama going to declare mission accomplished.?
Posted by: CW
what we know for a fact is who really did say mission accomplished, and the arrogant, flailing in the dark futility that was the policy of Bush/Cheney
Posted by: XX | December 28, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Obama is the same or worse than Bush.
Posted by: CW | December 28, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Obama will never declare mission accomplished as he is incapable of accomplishing anything.
Posted by: jonny | December 28, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“you can clearly blame the rightwing and Republicans for that, even as far back as the campaign for the presidency, the constant attempts to demonize Obama as a foreigner hit new lows even for the insane right wing hate machine.”
You obviously have not been following The One’s freefall in job approval ratings from 70%+ in January to under 50% less than one year later.
Yeah, his radical and hard move to the Left had nothing to do with it. His steady-stream broken promises had nothing to do with it. It’s (fill in Republican du jour)’s fault.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
And stop blaming Obama for blaming Bush. He’s mentioned only rarely that he inherited a couple of major problems and never referred to Bush by name.
__________________________________
Facts are apparently irrelevant to those out to smear the President.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
And since then has done little if anything to bring us together.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It’s Sat Night!
you can clearly blame the rightwing and Republicans for that, even as far back as the campaign for the presidency, the constant attempts to demonize Obama as a foreigner hit new lows even for the insane right wing hate machine.
Posted by: Oh Say, Can You See?|
************************
Do you even see the irony in what you say? Open mindedness is a good thing. Even us insane right wingers know that. Wow!
Posted by: wow | December 28, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
janet incompetano… i love it and liberals thought they are so much smarter than us dumb conservatives. duh lets talk to the terrorists….iranians need our help and we are sitting on our thumbs.the incompetence of elite arrogance is coming home to roost.
Posted by: catman | December 28, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
tierra…facts are not used to smear. facts are just that and this administartion has a difficult time with facts.
Posted by: catman | December 28, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Anyone that believes that every terrorist attack attempt will be stopped is delusional. I do believe though that several plots(8) have been stopped just this year by this HSA that so many are calling incompetent right now. I am very proud of the passenger of 253 that stopped this murderous thug as I was the passengers of flight 93 that gave the ultimate sacrifice. Too bad that everything has to be so partisan and hateful now even when lives are saved on Christmas Day.
Posted by: gail | December 28, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
tierra…facts are not used to smear.
__________________________________
You’re exactly right . .. it wasn’t facts being used to smear. It was the lie that Obama ‘blames everything on Bush’. In FACT, it’s often lies posted to smear the President.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Too bad that everything has to be so partisan and hateful now even when lives are saved on Christmas Day.
________________________________
The hacks who attack the President and his family apparently take no breaks from their hateful attacks and have no respect for holy days.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
You all have been blaming Bush for every Obama misstep as long as I’ve been reading this blog. The hypocrisy and sanctimony is as thick as pea soup tierra.
Hope you had a Merry Christmas and have a Happy New Year.
Posted by: wow | December 28, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
You all have been blaming Bush for every Obama misstep as long as I’ve been reading this blog.
_________________________________
Surely you can differentiate between statements by the President of the United States – and what a bunch of bloggers post? Surely!
The President was being smeared as someone who ‘blames Bush for everything’. That is not true. We bloggers are a different story . .
But no, we don’t blame Bush for every misstep Obama makes.
It is Obama’s job to wrestle with the severely damaged economic situation he was left when he took office – but he did not create that economy, and he cannot be blamed for it.
And yes, when we hear Obama attacked by the Republicans and the right wing extremists, we will draw a comparison between the two administrations to show the hypocrisy of the Republicans, or the relative strengths and weaknesses of Bush compared to Obama.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
nice try…but “We’ve asked citizens to be vigilant, to be alert to any possible threat. The success of this strategy was made clear by yesterday’s indictment of Richard Reid..” says it pretty clearly. The strategy mentioned was getting citizens to be vigilant. The Napolitano claimed that ‘everything worked as intended’, before she said it failed. Passengers look out for their own safety now regardless of what politician seeks to take the credit.
IF govt is to be held accountable for its failures as it brags about its ‘successes’, then the hammer of discontent should fall down hard on these self-focused braggarts.
Posted by: bluecollarbytes | December 28, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
“Once the incident occurred, the system worked,” (Napolitano) told me on This Week on Sunday. “The passengers reacted correctly, the crew reacted correctly, within an hour to 90 minutes, all 128 flights in the air had been notified. And those flights already had taken mitigation measures on the off-chance that there was somebody else also flying with some sort of destructive intent.”
______________________________
There’s the quote.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Tierra: This administration is in over his head, weak which makes us vulnerable. These terrorists want to destroy us yet Obama put this incompetent Napolitano in the position. Obama released the two terrorists from Gitmo involved in this attack. Obama is the one that wants to treat these terrorists like an american citizen instead of a war criminal. How much information did we loose for possible future attacks providing him a lawyer like he had just robbed a 7/11 store. This administration is a threat to all of us whether it is his weak international experience or his out of control spending. We are on a path of destruction.
Posted by: Linda | December 28, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
The President was being smeared as someone who ‘blames Bush for everything’. That is not true.
Posted by: tierra
********************
It sounds weak and ineffectual to be blaming your predecessor for the challenges you face. This administration needs to man up and stop talking about “inherited problems.” He knew what he was facing as president and he said he was the best man for the job. He needs to start working with both parties and come up with centrist policies that will please the electorate. We are not a leftist country. You can spin all you want tierra, but this administration needs to take responsibility for the problems that are occurring during his presidency. And yes he can be credited with the stimulus bill that was supposed to save our economy and signing these pork laden bills. Fort Hood was on his watch and so was this airline bomber. Fix the problem. Don’t spin it or blame someone else. Act like an adult.
BTW, I don’t need someone telling me about the hypocrisy of the democrats. It’s in full view everyday.
Posted by: wow | December 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
his radical and hard move to the Left
Posted by: tjp612
hmmm. escalating the Afghan war, increasing drone strikes all over the region, now qualifies as leftist…
the ‘rightwing’ fringe are very strange indeed, their ‘standards’ radically change from day to day..
Posted by: Oh Say, Can You See? | December 29, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am
It sounds weak and ineffectual to be blaming your predecessor for the challenges you face.
Posted by: wow
you should ask that question to one of your rightist mouthpiece martyrs, Mary Matalin who amazingly claimed the other day, that Bush inherited Sept 11th,..
revisionists hard at work..
Posted by: Ratso Rizzo | December 29, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am
It sounds weak and ineffectual to be blaming your predecessor for the challenges you face.
Posted by: wow
depends, if you have to manage 2 wars that the previous administration started, poorly managed and didn’t resolve, the result is:
you are left with 2 unfinished wars, that you have to try and win, as the previous Bush Co. had no intentions of winning the wars.
Posted by: XX | December 29, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am
jonny wrote: “Obama will never declare mission accomplished as he is incapable of accomplishing anything.”
Yeah, anybody can get him/her self elected president.
Posted by: The_Mick | December 29, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Success, Mission Accomplished….aren’t these the facts. I blame the Dummy for giving Al Qaeda power, and just stirring the pot of the Middle East for invading Iraq……Al Qaeda wasn’t who he and his administration was after. And it’s obvious that the system put in place by him, including Gitmo do not WORK. Furthermore, there were hundreds of detainees sent back by the Bush Administration to Yemen…FOR “REHABILITATION” who are Now engaged in “revenged” Terrorism. Rightwing-nuts are so blinded, and Do Not hold the key to my safety…..all mouth, and little action.
Posted by: sara | December 29, 2009, 6:09 am 6:09 am
Jason…if you write long comments to try and convince someone else of your “facts”….please get it right! The Bush administration RELEASED hundreds of Gitmo detainees back to Yemen…..and the Obama administration has plans to release the 7, since this is one of the policies he’s kept to closed down the torture chamber. So…are you saying that Bush knew that the “radical cleric” is behind these attacks also?
Posted by: sara | December 29, 2009, 6:13 am 6:13 am
Obama hasn’t had misteps….and calling it like it is …. isn’t blaming. Rightwing-nuts supported the Radical Bush and look where it’s taken us. Two unfinished wars that wasn’t paid for, a Weakened country that no ally respected, and now you scream! You people are laughable. Linda…bullying and spreading fear to your people has nothing to do with “strength”… Wasn’t Bush the one who suggested that the Terrorist was “supermen”…yeh, right! I’m so scareddddddddd.
Posted by: sara | December 29, 2009, 6:22 am 6:22 am
Jake,
You make a good point. There is a lot of finger pointing from the right that the current administration let down the guard to the point that this attempt could have led to a disaster – and they had a few close calls their-own-darn-selves that were cocked and loaded before they were thwarted.
It is just time to install the full body scanners at the gates and get this done. There has been a lot of resistance to this measure but if we don’t we run the risk that some unknown, undetected, undetectable sole practitioner will make through the check points under the current system. We have the technology let’s use it.
If this is viewed as some kind of massive intrusion of civil rights and privacy then those people can start driving instead of using planes. There is a war going on out there and these idiots are targeting innocent people as legitimate combatants. The rules of engagement have changed: we can’t necessarily look at our enemies in the eyes; they are cowards and sneak up when no one is looking and blow up planes. We need to get over the civil rights issues and seek safety against these acts of coward-ism.
Let’s end this debate and take the path of protecting our citizens and the citizens of the world.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 29, 2009, 7:09 am 7:09 am
and people rightfully ridiculed them too. what’s the point? saying the government thwarted either is like saying the police stopped an attempted murder when the shooter pulled the trigger and the gun jammed.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | December 29, 2009, 7:44 am 7:44 am
This economic mess started after the Democrats took control of Congress in ’07. And Obama has blamed the Bush administration for current problems.
Posted by: TKM | December 29, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am
This problem is deadly serious and the continuing politization only aggravates
it. Politicians and their followers from both extremes are quick to blame but slow to offer possible solutions. No one has commented on the fact that the watch list contains half a million names. 500,000 names!!! How is it possible to keep track of so many? Those who want to blame the current administration forget that the system in place was set up by the Bush administration and that the young man received his visa last year. The entire system, including the consular process for granting visas, needs to be studied and improved. Spending time blaming either Bush or Obama is senseless. The people who actually implement the procedures (consular officials, intelligence agents, TSE workers, airline employees, etc.) are not political appointees. The great majority are competent and responsible, but some are not. When a system fails, it is because it begam failing at one point. In this case, the initial mistake was in granting this man a visa to the US, especially when the UK wouldn´t do so. (Can´t the UK and US share information more efficiently?).
We should support the efforts to investigate and improve the system, although undoubtedly one end result will be to make security checks at airports an even more horrendous experience for the ordinary traveler.
Posted by: BachisBest | December 29, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am
BachisBet said “Those who want to blame the current administration forget that the system in place was set up by the Bush administration.” Yada, yada, yada! Blame Bush is getting old! This administration is so lack in keeping us safe that there is no doubt in my mind that something catastrophic is going to happen during their watch. They are so “Politically Correct” that they are afraid to call a terrorist a terrorist!! Look how they handled the Fort Hood TERRORIST – afraid to call him what he was. It’s sickening!!
Posted by: M. Summer | December 29, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
MSummer, my point was that blaming either administration is senseless. And I wasn´t criticizing Bush, only stating a fact.
Posted by: BachisBest | December 29, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am
ummm, Jake? ‘W’ has been out of office for over a year- this is now Obama’s baby. 2 terrorist attack in a little over a year- where’s the reporting on the disorganization of this administration’s personnel, bloated bureaucratic dept,s and soviet-style czars? and what came out of the fort hood investigation??? get on the ball, jake, and pretend to be a true journalist seekin answers and stop serving as BO’s stenographer
Posted by: realman1963 | December 29, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Let’s face it, repubs never do anything wrong. They’re perfect; right? Well, you would think so by listening to their disgusting talking heads trying to make political hay out of the “Christmas Bomber” especially when they voted to hold up TSA funding and DeMint is holding up TSA security chief nomination. And to think anyone in this country still considers them to be a party worth any vote is amazing – truly amazing!
Posted by: pamp205 | December 29, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
All you people that want to use the “Full Body Scanner” remember many in the rest of the world would be offend by its use on them becaue of privacy. You may claim that maybe they should not fly, so who cares. The result would be devistating because they would not buy US products because of that attitude. Then again, you claim we should not profile. Why not, because many will be offended. Life doesn’t work that way. I would rather profile people than to spend the tremendous cost of these devices. Why does our newly elected government call these “man caused disasters” instead of terrorisum. Its more likely the people we elected in government are just stupid, but that is offensive (to them). Then again, who cares.
Posted by: Tina | December 29, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
“soviet-style czars” — I’d like to nominate this little gem as Most Historically-Inaccurate Oxymoron of the Decade.
Carry on.
Posted by: Yukon Sam | December 29, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Yes, “the system worked,” when it verifiably failed in every way is the exact same as Ashcroft encouraging the vigilance of the citizenry and lack of dependence on government.
What happened, Tapper? Not getting invited to the right parties anymore?
Posted by: Melvin_Udall | December 29, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Realman1963 – I know that you, as a right-winger, rely on brainless slogans more than you do on facts, but there is no such thing as a “Soviet Style Czar”. The Bolsheviks got RID of the czars. They hated the czars and executed the last one. So, you can either be “Soviet Style” OR you can be a “Czar”, not both.
Go get an education instead of screaming and spewing meaningless Tea-Partyesque slogans.
Posted by: Sunil | December 29, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Lets face it. INformation was given by the terrorist father to the american embasy,the information got lost some where.The person jumping and stopping the guy is to be expected, we are not going down without giving a fight anymore after 9/11. That America elected a moron for Pres ? absolutely !That some of you still believe on his farce ? absolutely ! is called denial.
Posted by: Not a Sheep | December 29, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Wow…let’s move on already. When they release terrorists in Illinois after closing Guantanamo; Are they going to blame that on Bush too?
Give me a break. It’s time to put on the big boy pants and have some accountability. I would have fired an employee by now if they kept making all these excuses.
Posted by: Rochelle | December 29, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
September 11th was a wake up call to the US. Until that time we were blind to the fact that it could happen here. Now we know and we have to be vigilant, follow all leads, claim responsibility when necessary and fix weak links in the system. There was an obvious weak link from the US Embassy. Let’s fix it and move on. Terrorists spend all their time creating nothing of value to humankind. They devote their lives to destroying others and sometimes they will be successful. The sooner we learn that and take as many precautions as possible the better off we will be. Thank God we were lucky this time!
Posted by: Gary | December 29, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Bush claims a V by stopping the shoe bomber…ok well, his administration ignored the threats about 9/11 and then lied the American ppl to get us into a never-ending war that wasn’t paid for. Not only that, the Bush Administration destroyed the economy and allowed ppl like Madoff to exist. Had McCain/Palin won, we would be in the deepest depression this country has ever seen while McCain lives off of his wife’s millions. The republicans are a nutty bunch of whiney, vindictive 2year olds. It’s pathetic.
Posted by: Delena | December 29, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Bush claims a V by stopping the shoe bomber…ok well, his administration ignored the threats about 9/11 and then lied the American ppl to get us into a never-ending war that wasn’t paid for. Not only that, the Bush Administration destroyed the economy and allowed ppl like Madoff to exist. Had McCain/Palin won, we would be in the deepest depression this country has ever seen while McCain lives off of his wife’s millions. The republicans are a nutty bunch of whiney, vindictive 2year olds. It’s pathetic.
Posted by: Delena
______________________________
….and what are YOUR party’s victories?The very reason there was a terrorist attack in the first place is because the liberals wanted to close GITMO and consider the terrorists there to be “victims” of the Bush administration. The two Al Qeada leaders from Yemen who planned last week’s attack were former prisoners of GITMO. Congratulations on your victory!
Posted by: marco | December 29, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Obama should take on the cynical accusations of Republicans who use terrorism as their own political pawn. They should reveal the extent to which the Bush Administration was aware of 9/11 before it happened and what it did to stop the attack. Once that cat is out of the bag, I suspect the Republicans will not dare to pull these kinds of ploys again.
Posted by: Joel Miller | December 29, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
The two Al Qeada leaders from Yemen who planned last week’s attack were former prisoners of GITMO. Congratulations on your victory!
_________________________________
Those two were released by the Bush administration in 2007. Yet another Republican victory?
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
The two Al Qeada leaders from Yemen who planned last week’s attack were former prisoners of GITMO. Congratulations on your victory!
_________________________________
Those two were released by the Bush administration in 2007. Yet another Republican victory?
Posted by: tierra | Dec 29, 2009 4:32:42 PM
Isn’t that the “liberal way”? I thought you WANTED Gitmo closed and the detainees realeased? Is it wrong that Bush let them go, but will be right when Obama does it?
You are one big talking point, tierra.
Posted by: Shoe | December 29, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
The two Al Qeada leaders from Yemen who planned last week’s attack were former prisoners of GITMO. Congratulations on your victory!
_________________________________
Those two were released by the Bush administration in 2007. Yet another Republican victory?
Posted by: tierra | Dec 29, 2009 4:32:42 PM
Isn’t that the “liberal way”? I thought you WANTED Gitmo closed and the detainees realeased?
__________________________________
BUSH released these two, not Obama. Can you Republican and right wing fools not accept responsibility for anything? Grow up.
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
What policies and/or legislation passed by the democrats in 2007 brought on “The Great Recession”? Sadly, as so often is the case, a lot of readers just regurgitate ‘facts’ heard from Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck.
Posted by: Gladi8er | December 29, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Wow…let’s move on already. When they release terrorists in Illinois after closing Guantanamo; Are they going to blame that on Bush too?
Give me a break. It’s time to put on the big boy pants and have some accountability. I would have fired an employee by now if they kept making all these excuses.
Posted by: Rochelle | Dec 29, 2009 12:54:05 PM
_____________________________________
big talk coming from people who, to this day, can’t use the name Bill Clinton often enough while they have their arm extended with a finger pointing away from themselves……do you fools actually listen to yourselves?
Posted by: dk | December 30, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Jake – love your writing and have linked to you numerous times on my blog, but I’m surprised you’re not seeing the differences between claiming that the US call for citizens to be ‘vigilant’ and ‘alert’ that was being praised by Ashcroft for working in the aftermath of the Reid incident versus Napolitano’s and Gibbs’ respective claims that “the system worked” when it in fact did not, as we are learning more and more each day.
From your own piece:
“We’ve asked citizens to be vigilant, to be alert to any possible threat. The success of this strategy was made clear by yesterday’s indictment of Richard Reid, ***who may very well have succeeded in destroying American Airlines Flight Number 63, as the indictment charges, had it not been for the courage and attentiveness of the citizen passengers and crew.”***
(asterisk emphasis by me)
Contrast “had it not been for the courage and attentiveness of the citizen passengers and crew” versus “the system worked.” Huge difference.
Posted by: Sister Toldjah | December 30, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Ridge acknowledged that it was a passenger who thwarted the attack. Janet said that “everything” was done as it should have been. There’s a big difference. Democrats were the ones screaming and pressuring to release Gitmo prisoners. Liberals in Congress forced the releases and demanded to release even more people.
Posted by: TheTruth | December 30, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
NO ONE in The Bush Administration EVER said:
“The System Worked!!”
After ‘The Shoe Bomber” episode. Giving credit to good citizens is good – which is what the Bush Admin DID: They GAVE Credit to the Citizens, they DIDN’T TAKE Credit for the actions of the citizens. That is a balanced response. TAKING credit for the citizens actions as the Obama Admin did, both Gibbs and Jannie, and saying:
“The System Worked!!”
Is an indication of self-aggrandizing DELUSION and indicates a TOTAL DISCONNECT between REALITY and The Obama Administration.
The Bush Administration WAS NOT disconnected from REALITY in this area and, no matter HOW MUCH all of your Terrorist-Cheering Mainstream Media Types TRY to depict things that way: the PEOPLE are SMARTER than that and they KNOW BETTER!!
“The System Worked!!” is the sound of the Obama Admin PROVING their BREAK with Reality!!
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | January 2, 2010, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Ok… For you Obama followers that don’t have a clue on facts let me help you. Terrorists should be handled by the military. Period. Our judicial system is weak. Want proof. How about O J Simpsons. Check and mate. Next the current economy is not bushs fault it’s Clinton. He signed the CRA which let “less than creditworthy” people buy home they could never afford. Want proof? Can a public school bus driver afford a 750 k $ home in 1income? Look it all up
Posted by: Humatang | January 14, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am