By Gorman Gorman

Dec 4, 2009 10:41am

Clinton Urges Allies to Contribute Troops, France May Too

ABC News' Kirit Radia reports: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is in Brussels today to push allies to contribute more troops to the fight in Afghanistan. She faces steep skepticism from many countries, particularly in Europe, but it appears that her outreach has already been met with some success. NATO's chief announced today that 25 countries would contribute troops to Afghanistan in 2010.In remarks to the North Atlantic Council, Clinton acknowledged that countries face a political climate that is reluctant to step up the effort after eight years of war, but said stability in Afghanistan was vital for security.

"Today, our people are weary of war. But we cannot ignore reality.  The extremists continue to target innocent people and sow destruction across continents.  From the remote mountains of Afghanistan and Pakistan, they plot future attacks.  As (NATO) Secretary General Rasmussen said earlier this week, "This is our fight, together."  And we must finish it together," Clinton said, according to prepared remarks released by the State Department. Reporters were not allowed in the room to witness her speech, so it was impossible to verify whether it differed from the text provided.

Earlier this week President Obama announced the United States would send an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan and US officials say they are hopeful NATO and other countries will be able to provide an additional 5,000 to 7,000, bringing the total closer to the 40,000 the top US and ISAF general in Afghanistan Stanley McChrystal requested earlier this year.

During a meeting with Clinton today, Poland's foreign minister pledged an additional 600 troops, plus 400 more on standby, for Afghanistan. He said there will also be four Polish "mentoring teams," two for Afghan police and two for the Afghan army. This comes after similar pledges by Italy and Great Britain earlier this week.

There are also signs today that France may be backing down from an initial refusal to contribute more in Afghanistan. Earlier this week French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said in an interview that reinforcements were not needed where French troops are serving. But NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters during a meeting with Clinton today that he was "encouraged" by a recent change in the French position.

"Actually I have been encouraged by the latest signals from the French government, the French president Sarkozy and also today from the French Foreign Minister. They have indicated a willingness to look closer into the possibilities to adapt their contribution to our operation in Afghanistan. I think like Germany they will await the international conference on the 28th of January. Compared to what we have heard earlier I think its quite encouraging what we are right now hearing from Paris," he said.

User Comments

Didn’t NATO and the UN take over in Afghanistan and let the terrorists gain ground? NATO and UN are no good for finishing the fight. They are OK at peacekeeping, but if we need to kill terrorists, we should leave that to our troops. We shoudl use the NATO and UN troops for security only within the cities. We should be killing terrorists and training Afghani’s. As a retiree with 17 of my years overseas, I have lost all confidence in our allies to fight for anything.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 4, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

@ifrichar
You said “They(UN) are OK at peacekeeping”.
Hate to disagree but they are far from it.

Posted by: den | December 4, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

If those countries value the free world, they need to recognize that to ignore the problem, now, will cost them later.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | December 4, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Good thing we have Obama as president. He is getting so much better help from our allies than Bush ever did.
Oops, i guess that’s not true at all….

Posted by: jonny | December 4, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

He is getting so much better help from our allies than Bush ever did.
Oops, i guess that’s not true at all….
______________________________________
News reports today are that NATO has announced 7000 additional troops committed to Afghanistan.

Posted by: tierra | December 4, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Nato announces numbers and then the countries make committments. Who cares what they announce. It is what the member countries committ to, that matters. And that is what is dismal.

Posted by: jonny | December 4, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Thank heaven! Those ferocious fighting French are on the way. I’ve been praying the French would ride in to save the day.

Posted by: Ken | December 4, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

And don’t forget that the German troops are highly limited in terms of rules of engagement. They can’t fight at night for instance! Yup Good thing Obama is here to change all this.

Posted by: jonny | December 4, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Posted by: jonny | Dec 4, 2009 3:44:20 PM
You may think countries putting 7000 of their young people into danger in Afghanistan is a joke, but be assured the parents of those individuals do not think so.
I suggest you volunteer.

Posted by: tierra | December 4, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

It seems that good ol Hillary can get things done, too bad she is not president maybe we could have a recall and new election.

Posted by: earl | December 4, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I’d like to remind Jonny with his scarcastic comments about the French, that they suffered 4,250,000 casualties in WWI compared to our 205,000. They stemmed the German advance with a wall of blood. In WWII, though with a population a third of ours, they suffered about the same number of casualties as us, while being smashed by a superior foe. I opposed the Iraq blunder, but am willing to give Obamaa
a short leash to try and stabilize Afghanistan, with a clear and firm exit date.

Posted by: Jeanot7 | December 4, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

“France did what, during WW2?”.. Seems to me , all she did was cry, loose a few botles of wine, and just wait for other countries to come to their aid.. Dont tell me different.. “I WAS THERE”.

Posted by: STAN | December 5, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.