Gate-Crash-Gate On ‘SNL’

Very funny stuff.
Especially the part where Biden moves in to get his picture taken with the gatecrashers and Obama as usual is completely clueless.

The skit gave a realistic portrayal of a typical Obama speech. His speeches are so mechanical and boring that audiences either sleep or find other ways to pass the time.

Hilarious you can call the current President ‘clueless’ after 8 years of the other fellow. You mush have socks stuffed in your orifices.
Posted by: tierra
—————————————-and what is stuffed in your orifice?
Obama finally admitts Iraq surge worked, tells general that thats what he wants for afganistan BUSH #3

Tea Aira, what do you get out of defending the president so adamantly and brusquely, even when he and his staff are wrong?

In 1975 US government pushed ‘the coming ice age’… Great article about the LIARS like Al Gore and Newsweek

Funny. Ir’s be even better if Fred Armison would:
1. continually look back and forth at teleprompters
2. pronounce the herky-jerky cadence even more
3. talk about himself, keying in on the historic nature of every issue (it’s about Obama, remember?)
4. list rules for radicals in bullet point form
5. doing the ubiquitous hissing “s’s”, making sure to draw each one out, especially those that end wordssssss. this would give him time, of course to tilt his head upward and out, so we get a good look at the upside of his head, you know, like in the propaganda posters. it also would give “obama” a chance to pivot to the opposite-side telemprompter, a must for a telepromting prezzzzzzzz.

“Afghanistan would not be the mess it is today, if Bush and Cheney had kept their eyes on the ball instead of indulging their neo-con dream of attacking Iraq.”
Uh huh…
“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.” –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.” –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
“Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.” –Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.” –Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” Letter to President Clinton, signed by: — Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
“Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.” — Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

There is no such thing as a “denier” in global warming.
Terra Firma | Dec 6, 2009 9:08:56 PM
The current theory of climate change is based on a large foundation of observations and data (very little of it from those infamous 30 scientists who chatted about dolling up a power point). Anyone who is dismissing the result without bringing any data to the table or alternative analysis is not practicing modern science, they are denying a scientific result. Hence the term deniers. Those who work with the scientific method don’t really how to deal with people who dismiss the results without data – that’s the realm of politics and religion. Science argues data (which is where the theory of climate change came and has been supported over the past 30 years).
“why would the scientists mislead the public and destroy data”
There is no evidence of scientists destroying any primary data. None. The data is publicly available from the primary sources. Again, deniers don’t bring any data to the table. They arrogantly demand to see real scientist’s work to look for typos rather than collecting the data from public primary sources and doing a proper peer verification (ie, their own analysis).

The magnetic field of the earth has been declining in strength for the past couple of hundred years. (True)
However, it has begin to fall precipitously in the last 20 years. (also true).
Following the AGW method, I am going to posit that the cause of this decline is the general use of Cell Phones that has virtually exploded across the globe in the past 20 years.
If we continue using cell phones at current rates, the Earth’s magnetic field will virtually disappear by the year 2050. This will cause a dramatic weakening of the Van Allen belts which currently shields us from high energy particles. This will case a dramatic increase in cancers for all living beings that live on the surface of the earth. It may eventually lead to a return to the seas of all life on earth (thank God they are rising due to AGW).
Face it folks, we are done for unless we give up Cell Phones!

tierra, those quotes all had dates and it would take you no time at all to find out that they were true.

“Posted by: Mary | Dec 6, 2009 8:18:01 PM”
Interesting that the right wing thinks its was ok to invade Iraq based on what was said 5 years earlier.
recall that right wingers claimed that limited series of air strikes on Iraq as wag the dog tactics to distract from the burgeoning Lewinsky scandal.
Once again the mighty Clenis distracted right wingers while Iraq continued to build their non existent WMD stockpile.