Gibbs Passes On One Last Chance to Make Health Care Negotiations Transparent
On This Week this morning, I noted to White House press secretary Robert Gibbs that there was some deal-making that went on as the health care reform legislation hit the House and especially the Senate — the kind of deal-making that was one of the reasons that President Obama, then Senator Obama, pledged on the campaign trail that "we'll have the negotiations televised on C-SPAN, so the people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents and who is making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies."
PolitiFact labeled that a broken promise but in the spirit of the Christmas season, I was more generous, noting that there remains one more step in the negotiation process, and in fact last week President Obama told PBS about this final reconciliation between the House bill and the Senate bill, "We hope to have a whole bunch of folks over here in the West Wing, and I'll be rolling up my sleeves and spending some time before the full Congress even gets into session, because the American people need this now."
So, with that in mind, I asked Gibbs, will the president open up the doors for this final negotiation?
He's in charge of it. It's going to be taking place at the West Wing.
The President will have Democratic leaders from the House and Senate negotiating this House and Senate bill.
Will he commit to opening up that process to C-SPAN cameras so we can see how this happens?
Gibbs' response: "Well, Jake, first of all, let's take a step back and understand that this is a process legislatively that has played out over the course of nine months. There have been a countless number of public hearings. The Senate did a lot of their voting at 1:00 and 2:00 in the morning on C-SPAN. A lot of this debate — I think what the president promised and pledged was so that you could see who was fighting for their constituents and who was fighting for drug and insurance companies…"
But he was talking about negotiations, not voting, I interrupted. About the bill being put together.
"Well, but the bill gets put together on the floor of the Senate," Gibbs said. "That's where the bill got augmented. And I think if you watched that debate — I don't know — I wasn't up at 1:00 or 2:00 in the morning for a lot of those votes, but I think if the American public had watched — has watched the committee process play out in both the House and the Senate, watched the process play out on both the floor and the — the floor of the House and the floor of the Senate, you'd have seen quite a bit of public hearing and public airing, and I think quite frankly, people have a pretty good sense of who is battling on behalf of thousands of lobbyists that are trying to protect drugs profits and insurance profits, and who's fighting on behalf of middle-class Americans hoping once and for all to have access to affordable insurance and removing insurance company restrictions like discriminating against people that are sick."
So…what do you think? Is President Obama upholding his pledge of transparency?
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
the need for transparency died in Nov08
Posted by: Scott Malensek | December 27, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
no
Posted by: ctmom | December 27, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Obama: “If you misrepresent what’s in the plan, we will call you out.”
If you represent what’s in the plan, we will call you out.”
“If you try to figure out what we did to get the plan, we will call you out.”
“If you disagree with what’s in the plan, we will call you out.”
“Frankly, we just like getting up in your faces and calling you out.”
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength…
Transparency is Opacity.
Posted by: The Audacity of Copenhagen | December 27, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
That’s a rhetorical question right Jake?
Of course this is not a transparent process, otherwise they couldn’t have pushed this crap sandwich this far.
I’m a Cspan junkie and haven’t seen one open debate on this health care bill.
When Americans balk, we’re labeled domestic terrorists…
Unfortunately, most Americans are too preoccupied to notice that thuggery is going on…
Posted by: mjishernameo | December 27, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
The question is most certainly a rhetorical one.
Good questions posed of Gibbs!
Posted by: Bob | December 27, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Absolutely not, Obama is not upholding his pledge of transparency. His entire administration is narcissitic. They play the game of semantics that ex-spouses and errant teenagers play. It really is infuriating to say the least. His desire is to be a historic president and he will be, a historic failure.
Posted by: marmie | December 27, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Very little is transparent in this administration and Congress. I think what bothers me just as much, is they all then turn around and lie, stating how transparent they are. These lies continue constantly by the President himself; there’s no other nice way to put it. Never in my lifetime have I witnessed the blatant falsehoods this administration has told; it’s a disgrace to America and depicts everything America hates about politics.
Posted by: clk | December 27, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Thank you for asking this administration some real questions .
Posted by: nat turner | December 27, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
NO!!!!
Thank you for asking this administration some real hard questions!
Jake , you are great for this job!!
Please forward this comment to the ABC administration!! thanks.
Posted by: joli | December 27, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Obama and Gibbs are both cut from the same cloth of blatant and consistent dishonesty.
Another day, more lies, more hypocrisy.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 27, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
If the process had been transparent the average voter would be able to name the most important features in the bill’s 2,000 pages. Since even members of the Senate can’t do that, the process has obviously not been transparent.
Posted by: Tim Cavanaugh | December 27, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Another day, more lies
________________________________
Please identify the ‘lies’ in the above piece . ..
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Wow, it’s almost like Gibbs will spin his way out of any tough question…good thing he doesn’t get many of those.
Posted by: Jay | December 27, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Jake, thanks for asking what we the people are asking….when are YOU going to run for Congress??? As for Gibbs, the White House mouthpiece, let me just say, he’s no Tony Snow!
Posted by: Randy the AC guy | December 27, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Posted by: tierra | Dec 27, 2009 4:09:03 PM
Answer the question first – “Is President Obama upholding his pledge of transparency?”
Posted by: Rican | December 27, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
If someone does not know what is going on and who is doing what they are either not paying attention or are stupid. The entire HCR process has been totally open. You might argue that some things were initiated behind closed doors, but as soon as the doors were open it was full knowledge. Please name one thing that has occurred that was totally hidden from the American people and that you did not know about within hours.
I would say there has been pretty much total openness, and anyone who says differently has not watched CSPAN, or the news. To deny this is to ignore the facts.
Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Conservatives love to ignore the facts, while in truth they just refuse to listen to something they do not wish to hear.
Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
obamacrat for Palin … “You Lie”
No one in their right mind could be for Palin ROFL…much less a used-to-be-Democrat… Someone would have had to have a frontal lobotomy to make that big a jump. As I repeatedly have said Conservatives do not know how to not lie.
Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Proof – Fact: Obamacare will kill grandma.
_________________________________
right . . .
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Is Obama upholding his promise of transparency? No – but why would he start now? He hasn’t from the beginning.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 27, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Is Obama upholding his promise of transparency? No – but why would he start now? He hasn’t from the beginning.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 27, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Posted by: Rob | Dec 27, 2009 4:44:21 PM
“Please name one thing that has occurred that was totally hidden from the American people and that you did not know about within hours.”
Rob, I’ll name 3 for starters:
1. Ben Nelson’s bribe from Harry Reid to
secure 60 votes.
2. Infamous “Louisiana bribe” by Harry Reid.
3. Chris Dodd “100 Million Hospital”.
Need more milk Robbie?
Posted by: TruthCrusader | December 27, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
ellsbells930… please review the library of CSPAN… you do know what that is, correct?
Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Truthcrusader…
The fact that you just posted those remarks prove you know about them. So, what was hidden? I knew about that practically before the doors were open because I pay attention and can comprehend.
Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Well I am through for the day:
Rob: 7
Conservatives: 0
Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Posted by: Rob | Dec 27, 2009 4:47:37 PM
“I would say there has been pretty much total openness, and anyone who says differently has not watched CSPAN, or the news. To deny this is to ignore the facts.”
Car Dealers love it when Robbie shows up on their lots. Easy Sell that impressionable lad.
Name one single Stimulus or Healthcare Vote that has been drafted in total Transparency Lad.
Posted by: TruthCrusader | December 27, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Well I am through for the day:
Rob: 7
Conservatives: 0
Posted by: Rob | Dec 27, 2009 5:23:07 PM
Let me guess Kneel & Bob, you must keep score when you golf also.
Posted by: TruthCrusader | December 27, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Isaiah 5:20 “Woe unto you that call evil good and good evil.”
God is against insurance, “surety.” Insurance is based on fear, not faith; it is the devil’s territory. “By faith are you saved.” (Saved from a trap and the bondage and disease it creates.) If you fear losing your health, (house, boat, car, child etc) you insure them. You have to deny God’s power and His promises including “by Christ’s stripes, you are healed” to accept insurance.
Insurance is counter productive. One of God’s laws is, “That which you fear shall come upon you.” Also, “That which you sow, you shall reap.” It requires that you receive (reap) a sickness etc. for which the insurance will pay. We cannot solve the health problem using what God hates.
God warned against debt, interest, insurance, seeking riches and honors, pride and vanity. Our whole national system and most of the world is anti-God; anti-God is evil. Only terror and 4 x 7 curses are pronounced by God against the nation that rejects His commandments and wisdom. UNTIL we turn to Him in truth. (Leviticus 26)
God’s way is freedom; the devil’s territory is force, oppression and compulsion. Compelling people to buy insurance works against God’s law. It forces people to help others and makes enemies instead of close friends. It adds extra costs. It creates a way for major corruptions and bribery. It also pays huge salaries etc for administration costs for those who scramble papers around and decide who gets how much. It pays profits to investors. It brings confusion and hatred for the government like the IRS program. That is not helping the poor; that is using the poor. Health Insurance and other insurance is evil. It denies that God is our source and our protection.
HEALTH CARE REFORM conforms to: “Psycho-Politics-Address on
Health Care and Control.” by LP Beria at Lenin University
(Says only Faith Healing through the Bible can stop
control of the people through health care.) AND
HEALTH CARE REFORM also conforms to “45 Communist Goals For the
Take Over of America.” (control of courts, media, education, medical fields.)
See both at
Marie Devine
God has solutions to world problems we created by ignoring His wisdom.
Posted by: Marie Devine | December 27, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
No, I don’t think this has been an open process. Already we see that this isn’t a uniform bill; some will be charged a premium for “cadilac” plans, unless you belong to a union favored by the congress. If this passes, congress will have passed a law for us, without them having to abide by it and some state residents will have to pay more for the same service that other residents will get cheaper.
This is simply “breaking it off” in the middle class.
Posted by: david | December 27, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Anyone who thinks this process is the way laws were meant to be passed is clearly lost and beyond correcting. A certain sense of honour and integrity is required necessarily to be involved in such matters of public policy. A fact that is now completely lost in Washington D.C.. Transparency? You have got to be kidding!! Unfortunately our mainstream media has no teeth, for a candidate for President to make such a simple promise, “CSpan cameras in the room so you can see who is fighting for you” and to completely lie about something as important as this and get away with it, completely unscathed. ON FILM, PRESIDENT OBAMA SAID THIS!! No big deal I guess, I most likely just don’t understand what the meaning of the word is, is. No effect on the future integrity of Presidents, usually sleeping with an intern will probably lower most people’s expecations, huh.
Oh well, hope and change?????
Posted by: Joseph | December 27, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Rob – nevermind.. I was going to respond to you, but you aren’t worth it.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 27, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
People have no idea what a transparent government would look like – after the secret conivings of the last administration. They know so little about what was kept secret in the last administration, it’s hard to recognize the changes that have been made.
You only need to think one word to understand the changes that have been made in terms of more open government . ..
That one word is . . .
Cheney
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
More of the public watched this reform effort go down in flames than ever followed any other legislation.
What we saw left us shocked and appalled.
If there were any question that corporations own our government, it has been dispelled.
Posted by: Flash Override | December 27, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Jake–
BEST show ever. Nalipatano looked ridiculous explaining why we missed Abdul–Gibbs was nailed on transparency–McConnell could not explain his free spending.
As a President supporting, right leaning atty–never saw better .
Posted by: Richard Williams | December 27, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Rob-
You are one confused puppy. All the negotiations took place behind closed doors, nothing was on TV because the commitee meetings, Democratic caucus meetings with Obama, drug and insurance industry lobbyists and executive negotiations with the President and Rahm etc.etc.etc. all took place in secret. Sure we found out the end result but we don’t know who offered or exchanged which favors to make these strange results happen. We suspect some threats and promises were exchanged and money was certainly “on the table”. But C-SPAN was certainly not there and neither were you. We went for weeks while the Senate did not meet because they were having little six person deal-making sessions in backrooms. Wake up, have a cup of coffee, you’ll be OK.
Posted by: Dave | December 27, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Jake: I’d love for you to be the moderator every week on “This Week” You really nail both sides with fearless pertinent questions.
Posted by: JMR | December 27, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
More of the public watched this reform effort . . . than ever followed any other legislation.
_________________________________
I think you’re right Flash . .. the first time the public has been able to follow and be involved in any legislation to this degree.
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Gibbs is a freakin’ liar. His boss is a freakin’ liar.
I hate the Democrats and everything they stand for.
Posted by: Gerry in Maine | December 27, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
No, we did not get the transparency candidate Obama promised. Are we surprised? No, we are not.
For those of you (rob and tieranita, principally) who try to insist that we were kept abreast of what was happening, I would respond that there is a huge difference between being told what has happened and having a voice in what is happening. Yes, we were told that Ben Nelson was bought off by Harry Reid, and Mary Landrieu rushed to the well to explain that her state’s payoff was not $100 million, as originally reported, but $300 million, for which she was not going to apologize. Did we have any recourse, any ability to stop these deals from going forward? Nope. Did anyone in control of the health insurance legislation bother to take our protests and complaints into account? Nope.
The president himself was not even transparent to members of congress. He left the congress to work out the gory details, leaving vague hints of what he wanted or didn’t want. Public option? No one seemed to know how strongly he supported it, and once it proved politically poisonous in the Senate, he walked away from it without hesitation. Where would he draw the line? What measures were completely necessary or completely out of bounds? Well, that depends on the day, the time, the circumstances, the questioner. It’s ridiculous. Gibby should be ashamed of himself for his answer to you, but then, the man, like his boss, is shameless.
Posted by: moderate | December 27, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Sorry moderate, I disagree . . .
This is the first time the public has been able to follow and be involved in ANY legislation to this degree.
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
No, tieranita, we were not INVOLVED. At least, not as far as the Democrats were concerned. Town hall meetings? Check. Emails and calls to representatives? Check. Having our input matter? No check.
And please don’t tell me that you think having special interest groups like the AMA sign off on the plan because they got concessions counts as “involved” either. Or having Big Pharma bought off before negotiations start in interest. Or inviting people to break into small groups at a White House forum and brainstorm. (After all, no substantive suggestions from that meeting were heralded by the authors of the legislation or insisted upon for inclusion by the president. It was just an exercise in window dressing)
You are always challenging people to provide examples– so why don’t you provide some examples of how the American public (not the president of SEIU or the leaders of OfA, etc.) were actively INVOLVED in shaping this legislation?
Posted by: moderate | December 27, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
The only thing that is increasingly transparent is that this President talks in platitudes and then, when he has a perfect opportunity to deliver a morsel he acts like he never really said it. Even guys I know that are sympathetic with the President are starting to view him as a talking head.
It is to the point that even he cannot defend his record on transparency and bi partisanship. he even told us at one point “he was going to make government cool again.” (of course, this “again” part is debatable) He is so inclined to mislead, redirect and misrepresent that the whole process is repugnant.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 27, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
The only thing that has become apparent
and transparent is that Obama is a
typical politician. Say one thing and
then do something which is the complete
opposite. He is running this country
into the toilet.
Posted by: wis134 | December 27, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
moderate . ..
This is the first time the public has been able to follow and be involved in ANY legislation to this degree.
If you can find examples that disprove this, present them.
You may dismiss input from the AMA, nurses association, seniors associations, mayors, hospitals, the Mayo clinic, native organisations, veterans organisations – the list goes on and on. There have been so many organisations that have had input into this legislation.
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I am waiting for the President to meet with members of congress at the White House and go “line by line” through the health care bill.. Perhaps this will be on CSPAN.
Transparent…. what a joke. who went to the WH to work out a deal on healthcare??? Insurance Companies, Big Pharma, Unions… who did they meet with? thats right…. the former health care lobbyist that works in the White House…. Who was behind closed / locked doors in the Senate…. why it was that guy the lobbyist… Tom Daschle…. This bill was so transparent it was not even made public before it was voted on… Yet another promise not kept by the Pres.
Here’s a good one for you, this bill will reduce the deficit and will pay for itself. hahahahaha!! I’ll believe that when every person who has uttered that riduculous sentence puts his own personAL checkbook where his mouth is…i.e. if the health care plan is under water in the next 12 years then all these idiots will pay for it out of thier OWN POCKETS….
Posted by: kringeesmom | December 27, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
I think Politifact got it right. I was disappointed by the lack of transparency when it came to the initial wheeling and dealing with Big Pharma and others. BUT I also think that during the campaign Obama was distinguishing the process from the way Hillarycare went down– and this process was more out in the open, without living up to the campaign promises. There were town halls, debates, bills online– plenty of time to weigh in and digest. So it wasn’t quite the total lack of transparency that some are claiming– but there weren’t negotiations on CSPAN.
We can keep pushing for more transparency. I think President Obama will continue to move incrementally toward a more ideal situation in that regard.
I’m not nearly as disappointed with this “broken promise” as I was when Bush did a full 180 on his promises related to the environment and climate change. His efforts to evade responsibility included greatly exaggerating obstacles, denying or twisting the science and promising magic bullets where there were none.
Posted by: progressive mama | December 27, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Tim Russert would have never let him get away with that. Shame on you Jake
Posted by: Sarah | December 27, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
That one word is . . .
Cheney
________________
I knew that Bush & Company was going to end up as the culprit here. LOL – it was just a matter of time.
Let’s check that campaign promise checklist and see if Bush & Cheney ever made a promise of transparency. Oh yeah – he didn’t. Then again, it is Bush and Cheney that are liars, not Obama and Biden.
So when it is all said and done does the Obama administration ever get tagged as liars? Even Bill Ayers said that the forecast to be out of Afghanistan in 18 months is a lie. Does that make Obama a liar? What about the Stimulus plan? The President told us that this would save and create jobs and we needed to pass it right away (to the point that he didn’t permit anyone to read it before it was signed). It hasn’t delivered. Is that a lie? His promise for bi partisanship? Transparency? Gitmo? Or maybe his promise to go through the budget line by line and assess every single earmark to assess their effectiveness and productivity. he hasn’t done that – not once. Does that make him a liar? Or what about when he got up in front of God and everybody last week and talked about fiscal restraint and prudence. Turns out he has spent more money than any other President – ever. Does that speech make him a liar? And, the promise that he was going to bring “change” in the way Washington does business – fact is, it is more of the same on steroids. Does that make him a liar?
This whole business of Obama being a politician and “they all lie” is nonsense. If a man tells you he is going to do something and he doesn’t do it then, fact is, he either owes an explanation (that we buy) or he lied. He is doing and not doing things he promised and he is not offering any kind of explanation or excuse – he just acts like he never said it; he has lied. Do enough of that and pretty soon you get tagged a liar.
If I voice this concern the next thing you know tingle-up-the-leg Mathews is questioning whether my friends and I are racists.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 27, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
This is all a gag, isn’t it? Come on, it was written by Dave Barry…. wasn’t it? Dave, Dave, are you there?
Posted by: Harold Vick | December 27, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Then again, it is Bush and Cheney that are liars, not Obama and Biden.
________________________________
Well, Bush and Cheney probably were liars, but that wasn’t my point.
My point was if you want to see standards set for lack of transparency, you would be looking at the Bush administration. It’s my assessment the Obama administration is a vast improvement.
Do you remember the press secretaries for Bush? They would robotically repeat the same phrases regardless of what they were asked.
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
It’s my assessment the Obama administration is a vast improvement.
___________________
This is strictly subjective: I am from Missouri on this one. Show me.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 27, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
… it is Bush and Cheney that are liars, not Obama and Biden…. Posted by: Lone Star Rules | Dec 27, 2009 10:44:39 PM
…
Sometime check out David Corn’s top ten Bush lies from 2003 (I’m a uniter, not a divider; This allows us to explore the promise and potential of stem cell research;My plan unlocks the door to the middle class of millions of hard-working Americans)- that is before the second campaign and second term, and focuses mostly on the the 2000 campaign and the first couple years in office, or read David Corn’s book, which has a lot more.
Ultimately, its pretty clear Bush-Cheney misrepresented intelligence data– some would say brazenly and purposefully– and relied on dishonest arguments to whip up support for war with Iraq. They also made numerous false statements about the provisions and effects of his super-sized tax cuts.
Then there’s Karl Rove and Bush’s Interior Department. Whoo boy!
I don’t think Obama, Biden and Axelrod come close to being in the previous administration’s category.
I don’t think its fair to tag all of Bush’s alleged lies as lies– but its bizarre to watch people defend Bush and call out Obama, when he hasn’t even completed one year yet, and he’s trying to put us on a better path than we’ve been on.
Posted by: There is no Planet B | December 27, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Tierra, so your answer is, No, I can’t provide any examples of my claim that the public was involved. Just as I thought.
You keep repeating this inane mantra that this is the most involved the public has ever been in any legislation. Are you confused, spinning madly (my pick), or simply unaware of the multitudes of legislation that has been passed over the years with plenty of public input? How about congressional legislative hearings, with tons of testimony from the public, which help shape proposed legislation all the time?
You claim that your laundry list of organizations is proof that there were lots of groups who had “input” into the process. I notice you mention the Mayo Clinic, which has not endorsed the finished product– they were actually interested in fixing health CARE delivery, not just health insurance. I notice you mention lots of types of “associations” that you claim had input, but by and large, these groups represent entrenched special interests, not “the people.” By that I mean, for example, that the AMA was “involved,” getting payoffs for their interest group in exchange for their approval, but not a single doctor I have spoken with personally (and I have spoken to dozens) was involved or approves of the legislation. Union leaders have had “input,” it seems, and lobbyists for groups like Big Pharma,etc. I’m still waiting for your evidence that this is somehow different from any previous legislation.
Posted by: moderate | December 27, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
You’re in good hands because somebody has finally figured out a way to force thirt million Americans to buy health insurance or pay a fine.
Posted by: Dristan | December 27, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
This is not just another broken campaign promise.
Obama (whom I avidly supported because of his promises) BOUGHT votes for this giveaway to the insurance industry with tax money. Vote buying is a crime.
Time for impeachment
Posted by: Miri | December 28, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Dave: Thank you, very well put. I do believe Rob is in dire need of attention, from a girl.
Posted by: TruthCrusader | December 28, 2009, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Zero reporters on TV/Cable at this time have a great enough grasp of factual information that is complete enough to refute or accurately clarify ‘misleading’ statements made by politicians….
Reporters/Commentators need the access as part of their business and they will never bite the hand that feeds them, after all, they are part of a business.
Jake my brother, with all due respect, you looked a lil bit scared speaking to Sen. Mitch, and missed really making him explain,
and allowed Gibbs to imply nonsense.
Posted by: Don't Tase Me Bro | December 28, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am
“…There were town halls, debates, bills online– plenty of time to weigh in and digest. So it wasn’t quite the total lack of transparency that some are claiming..”
The only reason there were townhalls and debates is because the Republicans managed to keep Pelosi from forcing a vote on the thing before August. Then in August the teapartiers filled the townhalls and asked their representatives if they had read the bill, and a lot of them hadnt. There was not transparency because Obama wanted it, we got transparency because millions of ordinary Americans loudly demanded it.
A Congress which forces to vote on 2000 page bills without giving anyone a chance to read them first is not being transparent.
Posted by: Yehudit | December 28, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am
Then in August the teapartiers filled the townhalls and asked their representatives if they had read the bill,
Posted by: Yehudit
not the way I saw it happen live or on tv….
the tea folks just yelled and disrupted the meetings, they did not want answers, they prevented others from speaking and asking questions
Posted by: Oh Yeah | December 28, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am
A Congress which forces to vote on 2000 page bills without giving anyone a chance to read them first is not being transparent.
Posted by: Yehudit
of course the vote was to bring the bill up for more discussion as to what aspects of the senate and house versions might make it into a final bill to be voted on, so you’re wrong.. no law has been enacted, only further consideration..doesn’t matter if it had a million pages, ..
Posted by: Meds | December 28, 2009, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Jake: The biggest insult is that 0bama and Gibbs think we are stupid enough to accept that explanation. Thanks for asking great questions of both sides. You can’t make them answer the questions, but you did a great job of making them look stupid trying to dance around the answers. I’d love to see you keep the “This Week” gig.
Posted by: JMR | December 28, 2009, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Sarah has more hands on experience
Posted by: TruthCrusader
she is the poster child for the ‘peter principal’,
‘I must chuckle’ every time she posts more inanity from her facebook page, denies science, bails on her supporters, states that her quitting the Govs was a result of her detractors, takes on those dastardly late night hosts, she is the perfect american fraud/huckster .. do you really want to get into things that she has said that are such nonsense it makes republicans and conservatives run away from her
Posted by: XX | December 28, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Is it just me or does Obama stumble & ramble about his words when his teleprompters tip over or are not available to him? That was a red flag right away for me about the guy. Public speaking is not difficult when you understand the topic and it comes from the heart.
Posted by: TruthCrusader | December 28, 2009, 2:29 am 2:29 am
Sure XX, I can’t sleep. Let’s match Obama & Palin lies and see who has more of them as well as the severity of each.
Posted by: TruthCrusader | December 28, 2009, 2:35 am 2:35 am
Is it just me or does Obama stumble & ramble about his words when his teleprompters tip over or are not available to him?
____________________________________
You haven’t watched enough of his interviews with journalists, town hall responses or speeches with paper script – all of which Obama has done many times.
He seems to have a slight stammer at times, and will use an ‘ahm’ or an ‘uhm’ while searching for the specific way he wants to phrase something, but what comes out shows he’s up to speed on the issues, has an excellent overview of the broad strokes and small details and is able to articulate clearly and with subtlety and nuance – and it’s very precisely spoken.
Watch his interviews with journalists, town hall responses or speeches with paper script. He’s so far beyond the last guy there is no comparison.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 2:44 am 2:44 am
Tierra, thank you. I am impressed with your reply. What time is it where you are?
Peace
Posted by: TruthCrusader | December 28, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am
TC – I don’t know what time it is . . .
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Well they dont want us to see a bunch of criminals giving each other millions and millions of our tax dollars to each other, or for us to see that this entire bill is constucted for the insurance companies that gave so much for their elections.
Posted by: earl | December 28, 2009, 6:21 am 6:21 am
Ultimately, its pretty clear Bush-Cheney misrepresented intelligence data– some would say brazenly and purposefully– and relied on dishonest arguments to whip up support for war with Iraq.
___________________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those that think Bush lied and those that think he told the truth. When I talk to people that hate Bush it generally comes down to Bush Lied.” The battle lines are drawn on this issue.
Go ahead – ask one why they hate Bush so much. (I have done this many times). You will hear a lot of yammering around about ‘tude and arrogance and very little in the way of real substance and when pushed a little harder against that wall (this I have done a time of two as well) they will say “well, he lied!’
Try it. Ask people why they hate Bush. Find one of the rank and file, one of the people that Jay Leno likes to interview on the street that have no knowledge of who does what or who is who. These people are in abundance (or used to be) and are generally very vocal about their disgust with Bush. They hate him and not a little bit and see what they have to say. They think Bush is stupid and that he lied.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 28, 2009, 7:05 am 7:05 am
The other thing is that once they are Bush haters they hate everything about him – remember Bush is evil and stupid.
Here is a case in point on this emotional issue with Bush.
Here is tierra on the issue of Obama versus Bush as speakers.
“{Watch his interviews with journalists, town hall responses or speeches with paper script. He’s so far beyond the last guy there is no comparison.”
There is no doubt that tierra hates Bush and not a little bit. We have all heard it many times. It is just interesting that when supporters of Obama are confronted on his failings they invariably default to Bush s*cks and the world is a better place now that he is out of office (because he lies).
So did Obama win or did Bush lose the last election?
In the next election who will Obama run against? himself? It should be interesting to hear him say “and the failed policies of my earlier administration…” (just kidding, tierra)
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 28, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am
tierra said “You may dismiss input from the AMA, nurses association, seniors associations, mayors, hospitals, the Mayo clinic, native organisations, veterans organisations – the list goes on and on. There have been so many organisations that have had input into this legislation.”
But they only listened to those who agreed with them. They had a member of Congress, who is a doctor, offer to help and he was turned down because he wouldn’t tell them what they wanted to hear. Input? Then why did House democrats meet behind LOCKED doors, excluding Republican members of the committee? Why is it when I write to my representatives, both in the House & the Senate, clearly voicing my opposition to this bill, I get back a response THANKING me for supporting them in voting FOR this bill?
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 28, 2009, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Jake, you must be laughing at these comments. I sure am.
Posted by: KansasGirl | December 28, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Tierra wrote, “TC – I don’t know what time it is . . .” Translation: I don’t want to give any clues to my location, so as to mask the fact that I’m working in DC for Obama’s “community organizer”/activist group.
Posted by: Skeptical | December 28, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Obama lied Jake – get used to it. Surely you knew he was a leftist to whom truth is but an occasional choice of weapons of deception?
Gibbs doesn’t cause, nor can he change anything. He’s a robotic mouthpiece for the great ruling class (whoever they are)
Had your fellow professionals done their constitutionally protected mission, America would not be in the serious trouble that it is in now.
Posted by: Don L | December 28, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Who cares about the promises of transparency now, we already know what 0bama and this administration is up to. These health care mandates will criminalize inactivity! The only satisfaction I could possibly have is the schadenfreud from knowing that liberals and “progressives” will be forced to make out checks to those big bad insurance companies and support those rich, evil insurance CEOs.
Posted by: grumpygresh | December 28, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
It doesn’t matter if this administration is transparent or not. It doesn’t matter if they are corrupt or not. It doesn’t matter if they lie or not. All that matters to anyone is that Bush lied. Bush ruined everything. (extreme sarcasm here). Blah, blah, blah.
Posted by: gabe | December 28, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Jake, Now that his lies and deceptions are finally becoming clear to you and the rest of the MSM, are you now willing to start asking tougher questions and holding this administration accountable for the crap they shovel on a daily basis? Like it or not, you have missed opportunities over he past year and one half to hold Obama’s feet to the fire on this stuff. But you didn’t. You and others glossed over it and now we have this rank amateur chicago dirty politician as president. This stuff does not surprise many of us. We looked at him without the rose colored glasses all along and it was obvious. Start doing your job as an independent media and expose Obama for who he really is.
Posted by: Mikey | December 28, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
I oove the ignorant libs truther who says thath Sarah Plain “denies science.” Well the sCIENTIFIC DATA STATES THAT GLOBAL TEMPS HAVE GONE DOWN OR 10 YEARS IN A ROW! just proof of how religious libs have become. G Warming is based upon sunspot activity as the rest of the solar system as also warmed
Posted by: al brooks | December 28, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Obama is the ‘exceptional’ President – but not in the way one would think.
1) “there will be no lobbyists employed in my White House” – except the 21 I just hired
2) “allow five days of public comment before signing bills” – except all of the bills that I signed that haven’t had that (which is pretty much all of them!)
3) “negotiate health care on C-Span” -except for the house and senate health care bills in which both the Dems decided to avoid having any discussion or debate (additionally, Obama himself was part of closed door meetings negotiating with drug makers… still waiting for that to be broadcast).
4) “hold me accountable” – except when I mess up in which case I will blame ‘the previous administration’ (as an aside… if Obama is mopping up the mess, the next President will need a backhoe to clean up his mess!)
5) “I didn’t campaign on a public option” – except that it was in his campaign literature
6) “clean up wasteful spending in Washington” – except for the wasteful spending that I will sign into law
7) “not one US reporter in Asia asked me about the economy” – except for the ones that did
8) “my health care bill will not have… (insert one of many claims here)” – Obama does not have a health care bill. The House has one and the Senate has one – Obama does not. Oh… and both include federal funds being used for abortion…
9) “fixing our economy will require that everyone make sacrifices” – except for those of us living in the White House who will walk around in our $500 sneakers while we feed the homeless and eat $100/lb Kobe beef at WH functions
10) encourages us to all drive hybrids – except for those at the WH who are dining on pizza made by a chef flown to the WH from out of town to make the President’s favourite pizza and except for the WH who take AF1 to an earth day ceremony to plant a single tree.
Obama thinks himself above everyone else. He says a lot, but none of it is sincere – except when he talks about himself.
The list could go on and on and on and on…
Posted by: DB | December 28, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Bush isn’t president anymore, for crying out loud, get over it already!
The endless obsession with Bush looks like some type of mental illness – seriously. I can see why the right has nicknamed it Bush Derangement Syndrome. Newsflash – wake up from your coma – Bush has been gone from office for almost a year now and isn’t President anymore
This is all Obama’s baby now – this is now Obama’s economy. It’s now Obama’s war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It’s now Obama’s foreign policies (or lack thereof) that shape our stance in the world. It’s obvious he’s in way over his head and he behaves like a thug in the way he’s treated allies and enemies.
I never thought I’d say this but if a Democrat were to have won I wish it had’ve been Hillary rather than O’Bamboozle.
Posted by: DASh | December 28, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Bush isn’t president anymore, for crying out loud, get over it already!
The endless obsession with Bush looks like some type of mental illness – seriously. I can see why the right has nicknamed it Bush Derangement Syndrome. Newsflash – wake up from your coma – Bush has been gone from office for almost a year now and isn’t President anymore
This is all Obama’s baby now – this is now Obama’s economy. It’s now Obama’s war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It’s now Obama’s foreign policies (or lack thereof) that shape our stance in the world. It’s obvious he’s in way over his head and he behaves like a thug in the way he’s treated allies and enemies.
I never thought I’d say this but if a Democrat were to have won I wish it had’ve been Hillary rather than O’Bamboozle.
Posted by: DASh | December 28, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
This is all Obama’s baby now – this is now Obama’s economy.
___________________________________
It’s Obama’s job to wrestle with the severely damaged economy he found when he took office – but he most certainly didn’t create it regardless of how much the Republicans and the right wing would like to write George Bush out of the recent economic history.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
I am not sure Obama understands the difference in transparency and cloaking. Perhaps an esteemed scientist like Al Gore can explain it to him. Al is a degreed scientist right?
Posted by: George King | December 28, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Hell to the NO. When is Gibbs going to scrape up the filaments of integrity he may find sticking to his shoes and leave this position of chief book licker for Obama? Seriously, I see a Scott McClellan-like tome in his future.
Posted by: HillaryFan | December 28, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Perhaps an esteemed scientist like Al Gore can explain it to him. Al is a degreed scientist right?
_____________________________
No but he won an Oscar and a Nobel prize for his scientific work. This was actually after he invented the Internet.
You don’t need to have a degree when you are the guy that invented the Internet.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 28, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
All I know is that we were far better off in six years of Republican rule than we have been in the last 3 years of Democrat rule. I sincerely hope that the American voter can now see why Democrats should never be put in charge of anything. The lying, deception, lack of transparency and defiance of the will of the governed is shocking.
Posted by: Gene Retske | December 29, 2009, 5:15 am 5:15 am
DASh & mjshernameo,
Brilliantly stated.
Posted by: a.w. | December 29, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Jake, why didn’t you ask Gibbs where the ‘transparency’ was on December 17, when Obama gave INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) the authority to OVER-RIDE our Constitution’s 4th Amendment Right against Unlawful Search and Seizure and the Freedom of Information Act?
Posted by: fedupinflorida | December 29, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Two things you don’t want to see up close: making sausage and making legislation.
There are some things that you don’t need to televise: private conversations regarding legislation and policy, conversations about personal hygiene by members of congress. This isn’t reality TV, but a serious negotiation in which privacy (not secrecy) is needed..TV is not sunlight and disinfectant, its just a tool. and you don’t need a tool where its not needed…
Posted by: Jonesy | December 29, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Of course Obama lied about transparency, as he lied about many, many things he focused on in his campaign (if you remember he had a commercial saying that government-run healthcare was an extreme position that he did not hold!). He has lied about tax cuts, about lobbyists, about pretty much everything including creating the “most transparent” administration in history. I’m not 100% sure if these “promises” were made with the intent to break them or if he’s just so naive and inexperienced that he actually thought no one would pay attention or care.
Posted by: Amber | December 29, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
“So…what do you think? Is President Obama upholding his pledge of transparency?”
No.
Posted by: mbs | December 31, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Everyone needs to face it, we have a president that is a flat out LIAR. He said whatever people wanted to hear to get elected so he could make a push to socialism. This is the most corrupt administration and congress EVER. Everytime Gibbs talks he looks like a moron. The votes were televised? I am embarrassed to be an American with Reid, Pelosi, Obama and the jam it thru without reading it BS. Here is hoping Mass. smartens up and elects a Repub on 1/19, or if it comes to it one or two Senators aren’t around to cast a vote. I would ask for one of the lefties to come to their senses and do what us Americans want, but having a Senator drop is more likely.
Posted by: Tony T | January 5, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm