Hawaii on the Horizon, President Obama Praises Senate’s “Historic Vote”
Jake Tapper and John Parkinson report:
Before leaving this morning for his Christmas vacation in Hawaii, President Obama called this morning’s party-line 60-39 vote in the Senate for Democratic health care reform measures “historic,” adding that he looks forward to working with both chambers of Congress to bring a final bill to his desk next month.
"We are now finally poised to deliver on the promise of real, meaningful health-insurance reform that will bring additional security and stability to the American people,” President Obama said. “This will be the most important piece of social legislation since the Social Security Act passed in the 1930s and the most important reform of our health care system since Medicare passed in the 1960s.”
The president commended Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., for their leadership and said, "we now have to take up the last and most important step and reach an agreement on a final reform bill that I can sign into law."
That, of course, is easier said than done, with major differences between the House and Senate bill. One House Democratic leader — Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-NY, who chairs the House Rules Committee — yesterday wrote in an op-ed on CNN.com that "the Senate health care bill is not worthy of the historic vote that the House took a month ago." Upset that the Senate version of the bill doesn't include a government-run public health insurance plan to compete with private insurers and drive costs down, Slaughter said, "It's time that we draw the line on this weak bill and ask the Senate to go back to the drawing board."
Other major differences between the bills include more restrictions on funding for abortion services in the House version than in the Senate, and the Senate's proposed tax on so-called "Cadillac" health insurance plans versus the House's "millionaires' surtax."
Officials say Congress will likely forego the normal "conference committee" wherein House and Senate negotiators work out a compromise bill, and will instead likely be hashed out among Democratic leaders including Pelosi, Reid, and perhaps even the president himself.
“If this legislation becomes law, workers won't have to worry about losing coverage if they lose or change jobs," the president said. "Families will save on their premiums. Businesses that would see their costs rise if we do not act will save money now and they will save money in the future,” Obama said. “This bill will help reduce our deficit by as much as $1.3 trillion in the coming decades, making it the largest deficit-reduction plan in over a decade.”
The president said that while presidents since Teddy Roosevelt had been trying to reform the health care system, "time and time again, such efforts have been blocked by special interest lobbyists who’ve perpetuated a status quo that works better for the insurance industry than it does for the American people."
Of course, even some of the bill's supporters have said the bill will benefit health insurance companies. Sen. Bernie Sanders, Ind-Vermont, said "the insurance companies are going to make out like bandits."
Polls indicate the public largely opposes this bill, though they support individual elements of it when asked. The president continue to press his case about the bill, saying the legislation "includes the toughest measures ever taken to hold the insurance industry accountable. Insurance companies will no longer be able to deny you coverage on the basis of a preexisting condition. They will no longer be able to drop your coverage when you get sick. No longer will you have to pay unlimited amounts out of your own pocket for the treatments you need. And you’ll be able to appeal unfair decisions by insurance companies to an independent party."
The president said today’s vote brings the United States closer to making health insurance reform a reality, and called on Congress to finish the job.
“For the sake of our citizens, our economy, and our future, let's make 2010 the year we finally reform health care in the United States of America,” Obama said.
Following the bill's passage, President Obama called Sen. Ted Kennedy's widow, Vicki Reggie Kennedy; several Senate Democrats; and David Turner of Little Rock, Ark. Turner was one of several "insurance company victims" who sat with First Lady Michelle Obama during the president's September address on health care reform to a joint session of Congress.
Arkansas Blue Cross retroactively took away the health insurance coverage paid for by Turner, 43, a sales rep at Computer Hut, saying he hadn't disclosed previous medical conditions.
"They were some conditions either a), I didn't know I had or b) were over a regular person's head to know what they were talking about," Turner told the Arkansas Times. For instance, Turner didn't report a digestive system problem, Arkansas Blue Cross said, referring to a visit he made to a doctor about a hemorrhoid that didn't require treatment.
"I had no fricking idea hemorrhoids were a part of the digestive system," Turner said.
After his remarks, the president said he was "on my way right now to call a few" US troops "and wish them Merry Christmas and to thank them for their extraordinary service."
– Jake Tapper and John Parkinson
Email
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama on Wednesday expressed frustration with the way the Senate does business, saying the use of delaying tactics there harms the nation’s ability to “deal with big problems in a very competitive world.”
“Other countries are going to start running circles around us,” Obama said in a White House interview with PBS. “We’re going to have to return to some sense that governance is more important than politics inside the Senate.”
So, now that he is in the White House he wants Congress to change the rules to suit him? I’m certain “other countries” like Venezuela or Cuba don’t have to worry about parliamentary procedures.
C’mon, MSM call the president on these statements!
Posted by: The Audacity of Copenhagen | December 24, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
I still can not understand why this playboy needs another vacation he has been on one since taking office.Wow what a jerk .O yes He does not even beleive in CHRISTMAS anpothe joke sad sad sad we have him there .
Posted by: Joeray | December 24, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
this makes me mad. i saw on abc news a tour of the house he’s staying for two weeks. $4k per night. is this on his own dime? i need to make $8k to have $4k in disposable income because of this fool. he doesn’t make that much to afford that. i make just over a million a year and couldnt afford that. he’s much more worried about being a rockstar that really helping people
Posted by: paystoomuchintaxes | December 24, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
The House ought to just send their bill back to the Senate for approval. There is zero chance the Senate bill will pass in the house, so all that horse trading in the Senate was for nothing.
Posted by: Flash Override | December 24, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
I still can not understand why this playboy needs another vacation he has been on one since taking office.Wow what a jerk .O yes He does not even beleive in CHRISTMAS anpothe joke sad sad sad we have him there .
__________________________________
Here we go with the morons complaining about a Christmas holiday.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
–Here we go with the morons complaining about a Christmas holiday–
At least they haven’t confused Iran and Iraq.
Posted by: Which is Which? | December 24, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
“We’re going to have to return to some sense that governance is more important than politics inside the Senate.”
{Officials say Congress will likely forego the normal “conference committee” wherein House and Senate negotiators work out a compromise bill, and will instead likely be hashed out among Democratic leaders including Pelosi, Reid, and perhaps even the president himself.)
Yay for governance! Does anyone know when CSPAN will televise this?
Posted by: Secret | December 24, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Hooray! Messy as it’s been, this is historic, and its been a loooooong time coming.
Congratulations to the Senate!
Have a nice holiday in Hawaii, Mr. President!
Posted by: There is no Planet B | December 24, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
At least they haven’t confused Iran and Iraq.
__________________________________
Don’t be so sure. Bush confused Iraq and North Korea.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
I think that there are going to be challenges to this legislation and as for pointing out that this is as important as social security when the next 2 years it will run in the red is not a fine example of Government programs being healthy.
Does anyone wonder what is in the bill that is making healthcare stocks rise?
Posted by: david | December 24, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Does anyone wonder what is in the bill that is making healthcare stocks rise?
_____________________________________
Health care insurance coverage for 30 million more Americans coupled with stock market speculation?
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
I’ll be amazed if this bill actually makes it back through the House and to the President’s desk. It took a 67 seat Democratic Senate to create Medicare over the rabid and dishonest objections of Republicans (and with decades of hindsight, it is clear Republicans were lying and exagerating just as much trying to prevent the creation of Medicare). I just don’t think the Democrat’s 58+2 seat coalition will hold, even for this mild and very limited reform.
Posted by: jhw539 | December 24, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
When our representatives ignore the people they represent, then it is time to work VERY hard to elect new ones.
Posted by: Jeff | December 24, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
“Other countries are going to start running circles around us,”
a.) Other countries have been running circles around us for a long time (mainly because they promote a climate favorable to the development and growth of industry)
b.) In making decisions in where to locate operations, businesses focus on costs (primarily labor, real estate, taxes), infrastructure, labor regulations/flexibility (e.g., unions), and availability of appropriately skilled workforce. True, healthcare costs have risen (in part because the govt. – which controls 50%+ of annual healthcare spend – underpay physicians and hospitals whic are then passed along to private payers) and are a component of cost, however, if Obama was truly interested in increasing the competitiveness of U.S. industry why doesn’t he propose a cut to U.S. corporate taxes (after Japan, the highest in the industrialized world)?
Upon hearing that Obama was interested in repatriation of foreign profits, a country investment promotion agency from Central America with whom I work informed me she received calls from executives of three U.S. based companies who indicated they would move operations to her home country if legislation approved (Obama has since backed off).
BTW – there is a great article in the WSJ today (search “online wsj, Dr. Scott Gottlieb What Doctors and Patients Have to Lose Under ObamaCare”) that outlines how physicians, coverage, development of medical technology, and degree of govt. decision makers will have under ObamaCare. Very good read, well worth your time.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
“…who indicated they would move operations to her home country if legislation approved”
Clarification: These executives indicated they would move U.S. based HEADQUARTERS to her home country if legislation approved.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
This bill will get changed so much in the house that it will not be the same when it comes out becuase it is not far enough to the left for the liberals. Then we will see just how far they will go to get this passed.
Posted by: 'Un-American' | December 24, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
“Health care insurance coverage for 30 million more Americans coupled with stock market speculation?”
————————————–
Perhaps or were there some back room deals made with insurance companies as there were with drug companies?
Speculation is dangerous and paying for something for years before you get benefits might bump them in the short term but something doesn’t seem right about this…I hope I am wrong.
Posted by: david | December 24, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Other “historic” events:
- 9/11/01
- The Fall of the Roman Empire
- The Cultural Revolution in China
- Tsunami of December 2004
It is erroneous to assume that because an event is considered “historic” that a positive outcome will necessarily follow.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
a.) Other countries have been running circles around us for a long time (mainly because they promote a climate favorable to the development and growth of industry)
__________________________________
Yeah, like 1) no child labor standards, 2) no pollution standards, 3) restricted political freedoms, 4) military and police rule . .. .
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Obama should thank the taxpayers.
We are the ones that paid for the shady backdoor deals just to save Obama’s legacy.
The bill is so bad Obama had to payoff his own party to vote for it.
Obama cannot pass anything on his own merits. He either has to threaten, bow, or bribe.
Posted by: kyle | December 24, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Speaking of “paying for something for years before you get benefits” that is EXACTLY how Obama and Dems are able to claim “savings” and “deficit reductions. This legislation requires a “headstart” of four years in the form of tax collections and cuts (2010-2013) in order to make this bill deficit positive. The actual cost of this legislation is $2.4+ Trillion, not less than $900 Billion and does not “trim the deficit” as Obama and Dems disingenuously claim. They are, in fact, lying. Everyday.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Obama cannot pass anything on his own merits. He either has to threaten, bow, or bribe.
________________________________________
Try to catch up with what’s going on – there are two bills that have been passed; one by the house, one by the senate. Not Obama.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
The actual cost of this legislation is $2.4+ Trillion, not less than $900 Billion and does not “trim the deficit” as Obama and Dems disingenuously claim.
___________________________________
It was the Congressional Budget Office who claimed the legislation would trim the deficit.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
“Yeah, like 1) no child labor standards, 2) no pollution standards, 3) restricted political freedoms, 4) military and police rule . .. .”
Nice try. While these make for dramatic talking points, you once again illustrate you have no idea what goes on in the real world.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“Other countries are going to start running circles around us,”
—————————————
They already are simply because we are frozen in fear and uncertainty which right or wrong comes from the top.
I just saw that the continuation of hiring temporary workers continues at a faster pace and the thing that may bring us below 10 % unemployment is temporary hiring and hiring for half million temporary census workers.
Sad
Posted by: david | December 24, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“Yeah, like 1) no child labor standards, 2) no pollution standards, 3) restricted political freedoms, 4) military and police rule . .. .”
Nice try. While these make for dramatic talking points, you once again illustrate you have no idea what goes on in the real world.
________________________________________
Oh heavens no! Things like this don’t happen in the ‘real world’.
You didn’t repudiate a single point.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
“It was the Congressional Budget Office who claimed the legislation would trim the deficit.”
True – After 4 year headstart on paying for bill by collecting taxes and making cuts. In effect, 10 years of taxes and cuts are required to pay for 6 years of benefits. Get it?
10 years of ObamaCare will cost $2.4+ Trillion.
Obama/Reid/Pelosi are using 14 years of cuts and taxes to pay for 10 years of ObamaCare. This legislation is not deficit-neutral over long-run.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
The actual cost of this legislation is $2.4+ Trillion, not less than $900 Billion and does not “trim the deficit” as Obama and Dems disingenuously claim.
__________________________________
Actually it was the Congressional Budget Office who analyized the bill and came up with the figures on deficit reduction.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Get it?
______________________________
Of course I ‘get it’. Unlike Bush and the previous administration.
Bush and company tried to deliver programs while cutting taxes thus plunging the country further and further into debt every year of his presidency.
When the economy also collapsed on his watch, the country was in pitiful shape to absorb the blow.
Hence – exactly what you see now. The United States staggering under the weight of huge debt and a huge recession.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
When Obama says that he’s going to roll up his sleeves and get to work–that means hitting the campaign trail.
He’ll do what he does best. Travel around on taxpayer’s dime trying to sell
himself.
Campaigning, reading speeches, and leaving the governing to Rahm.
Posted by: ollie | December 24, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“You didn’t repudiate a single point.
tierra – look around – the jobs to which you refer (those that require unskilled labor) left the U.S. a while back. In the 90s and early 00s blue collar and back office/shared service positions moved off-shore with push to Latin America, E. Europe and Asia. White collar professional positions in financial services, R&D, and high-tech capital intensive industries have followed suit.
It’s convenient/easy/lazy to reach for expired talking points, but it exposes your lack of connection to reality. True, there have been cases of exploitation of labor in emerging economies, but once exposed, U.S. industry paid the price (see Nike, Walmart, etc. who were excoriated when suppliers with whom they did business were exposed for such practices).
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Posted by: tierra | Dec 24, 2009 12:24:45 PM
The oh-so-predictable “Bush Did It!” whose expiration date has passed.
I wonder if ObamaCare will cover Bush Derangement Syndrome….hmmm
Meanwhile, the Democrat “led” Congress and Obama have are incurring annual deficts in the TRILLIONS (for reference, Bush’s largest deficit was $400 billion)
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
“It’s convenient/easy/lazy to reach for expired talking points”
__________________________________
Oh sure . . . ‘expired’ talking points about companies producing overseas – like none of the following are taking place any more …
1) no child labor standards, 2) no pollution standards, 3) restricted political freedoms, 4) military and police rule . .. .
You’ve heard of China right? You think American companies went to produce there because of ‘health care’?
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Obama and the Democrats have been busy.
Quite a Christmas present they have given us.
One step closer to a $2T government takeover of our health care that most Americans don’t want.. And raised the debt limit another $300Billion.
Mandatory health care, new taxes, more debt for our grandkids–quite a gift.
Posted by: larry | December 24, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
The oh-so-predictable “Bush Did It!” whose expiration date has passed.
____________________________________
Sorry, as much as you Republican right wingers would like to re-write history the truth remains.
Bush and his administration did 2 major things.
They overspend and cut taxes thus plunging the country into debt totalling over $10 TRILLION dollars.
And the oversaw the complete collapse of the economy throwing the country into economic turmoil – hundreds of thousands losing their jobs each month, stock market crashing, bankruptcies and foreclosures through the roof and major banks and finacial institutions collapsing.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Awwwww
Obama’s health care bill may not be passed by his State of The Union.
And to think Obama was so naive that he thought it would be passed in two weeks before summer break!
And now his Gitmo deadline is pushed back another year.
Apparently Obama’s charm and charisma was enough to get him in the WH, but not enough to help him be an effective leader.
Posted by: cal | December 24, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
“They overspend and cut taxes thus plunging the country into debt totalling over $10 TRILLION dollars.”
tierra, we’ve been through this many times. I agree with sentiments of another poster: “worst case of BDS I’ve ever seen”
Bush: ~$2.2 Trillion in deficits 2001-2008 (This is Bad)
Obama: $5.0 Trillion in projected deficits 2009-2013
Obama: ~$8.1 Trillion in project deficits 2009-2016 (THIS IS DISASTROUS!)
How you can claim that Bush was more fiscally irresponsible than Obama is beyond belief. Pure BDS on your part.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Posted by: kyle | Dec 24, 2009 12:08:42 PM
Ezra Klein has a good post up about winning ugly. Since is the first time in a long time that our legislature has passed something big to address a major problem, we’ve forgotten how difficult, messy and ugly it can be. And we seriously need structural reform of the legislative system. Frankly, it should be a priority for progressives, liberals, conservatives, moderates–everybody.
Anyway, a snip:”Passing legislation, it turns out, is a long and ugly process. God, is it ugly. The compromises, both with powerful special interests and decisive senators. The trimming of ambitions and the budget gimmicks and the worship of Congressional Budget Office scores. By the end, you’re passing a compromise of a deal of a negotiation of a concession.
But bad a system as it might be, it’s the only one we’ve got…It’s not pretty, and it doesn’t necessarily feel like winning is supposed to feel. But this bill will do most of the things supporters hoped it would do: cover about 95 percent of all legal residents, regulate insurers, set up competitive exchanges, pretty much end risk selection, institute a universal structure that we can improve and enhance as the years go on, and vastly reduce both medical and financial risk for families.”
Well said. I agree.
Posted by: progressive mama | December 24, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Actually it was the Congressional Budget Office who analyized the bill and came up with the figures on deficit reduction.-posted by tierra 12/24 at 12:20p
——–
Tierra, of course the figures were produced by CBO, but I know you are completely aware that President Obama and the Democratic leadership in Congress eagerly jumped on those figures and have used them repetitively to encourage (browbeat?) senators to pass the Senate bill.
I do not for a minute believe you are so naive to not see that.
I don’t like this bill, and the methods used to push if forward are wrong.
Posted by: malcat | December 24, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
from Megan McCardle
“Congressional Democrats started out with a CBO score they wanted, and worked backward to the bill. They’ve been pretty explicit about the fact that no one wants this actual bill; rather, the plan is to pass basically anything, and then go and totally rewrite it when the budget spotlight is off. I’m not aware of any other piece of legislation that was passed this way. Essentially, the Democrats have finished the process of gaming the CBO scores. They’re now meaningless. You don’t pass a piece of legislation that bears any resemblance to what you intend to end up with; you pass a piece of legislation that gets a good CBO score, and then go and alter it piece by piece. . . . At every step, the bill is probably more likely to get worse than to get better. At any rate, passing a bill based on either a meaningless CBO score, or the notion that it can be rewritten to spec at some later date, is not a process for generating good legislation.”
Sounds about right to me.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 24, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
I do not for a minute believe you are so naive to not see that.
Posted by: malcat
Wanna bet?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 24, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Posted by: John | Dec 24, 2009 1:19:41 PM
It’s an Inconvenient Truth that Congress (who is responsible for developing appropriation bills) has been run by Democrats for almost 3 years now.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 24, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Try to catch up with what’s going on – there are two bills that have been passed; one by the house, one by the senate. Not Obama.–posted by tierra
———-
Tierra, did you not hear about President Obama’s closed-door meetings with congressional Democrats?
President Obama did everything he could to push these bills forward. The fact that he did not actually cast a recorded vote on either of these bills does not mean he did not help pass these bills.
Are you worried that something WILL go hideously wrong with the final merged product? Is that why you are trying to distance the President from the process?
I thought you had far more confidence in the Democrats and the President than that.
Posted by: malcat | December 24, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
It will be an especially merry Obama family Christmas with this major legislative victory in his stocking, coming despite the brutal summer of town halls and the like.
Posted by: matt | December 24, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
“Bush and his administration did 2 major things.
They overspend and cut taxes thus plunging the country into debt totalling over $10 TRILLION dollars.”
How much have Obama and the libs spent?
Posted by: I blame Bush | December 24, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Posted by: tjp612 | Dec 24, 2009 12:53:47 PM
Relax, Dems have raised the debt ceiling. What could go wrong?
Posted by: Not Worried | December 24, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
December 21 Rasmussen poll reporting 55% oppose this bill. 64% of voters not affiliated with either party oppose the plan.
In a letter sent late Dec. 22, about 36 hours before the expected Senate vote Christmas Eve morning, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops urged opposition to the Senate bill.
In addition to not maintaining the legal status quo on abortion funding that has been supported by President Barack Obama and by the majority of Americans in many polls, the abortion provisions in the manager’s amendment to the Senate bill would require purchasers of some health insurance plans “to pay for other people’s abortions in a very direct and explicit way,” the USCCB letter said.
“There is no provision for individuals to opt out of this abortion payment in federally subsidized plans, so people will be required by law to pay for other people’s abortions,” it added.
The Senate bill also fails to include provisions to prevent “discrimination against health care providers that decline involvement in abortion” and would not protect the rights of Catholic and other institutions “to provide and purchase health coverage consistent with their moral and religious convictions on other procedures,” the chairmen said.
Rasmussen polling released last week showed that 57% of voters say passing nothing would be preferable to passing the current legislation.
Whatever happened to the liberal mantra of get your laws off my body?
Now that the Democrats have gone completely against the will of the people and have dictated their own will onto us, is it safe to start calling them the communist party?
Posted by: EPU | December 24, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Let’s all chip in for a retirement home in Hawaai for the Socialist in Chief.
Posted by: bobmac | December 24, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
“Tierra, did you not hear about President Obama’s closed-door meetings with congressional Democrats? ”
No transparency? No CSPAN?! This is wrong!
Posted by: TeeVee | December 24, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
The Dems/Obama better raise the debt ceiling by another 200billion.
They’ll need bribes to get the House to agree to the Senate bill.
And more bribes to get cap/trade passed.
Posted by: mick | December 24, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Ezra Klein has a good post up about winning ugly.
Well said. I agree.
Posted by: progressive mama | Dec 24, 2009 1:00:43 PM
I’m so glad you and Ezra can be so unconcerned about the 30 plus million people who will remain uninsured for the next 3years or more. It must be nice.
I am opposed to this legislation but if the Democrats are going to pass it, they should at least be honest enough to insure these people asap or start with something that actually works. Otherwise, everybody gets screwed – except Congress of course.
They are so incompetent, they couldn’t even pass the proper legislation. What a joke!
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 24, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
When Obama says that he’s going to roll up his sleeves and get to work–that means hitting the campaign trail.
He’ll do what he does best. Travel around on taxpayer’s dime trying to sell
himself.
Campaigning, reading speeches, and leaving the governing to Rahm.
Posted by: ollie | Dec 24, 2009 12:30:00 PM
Another three to six months and Obama will start hitting the campaign trail for Nov 2010 elections. Then he’ll take a quick break in Hawaii for the holidays and head out for his two year reelection campaign! He’s just a tireless public servant!
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 24, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
tjp, I don’t know where your figures come from, and I think you are confusing deficits with debt.
According to Treasury, shen Bush took office, the national debt was $5.73 trillion. When he left, it was $10.7 trillion. That’s a difference of $4.97 trillion – that would be the sum of the Bush deficits.
However, it is even more than that, and you should know there is a reason that the deficits under Obama now look larger.
There were at least four accounting gimmicks that President George W. Bush used to make deficit projections look smaller. Obama’s changes include accounting for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (Bush relied on “emergency supplemental” war spending), assuming the Alternative Minimum Tax will be indexed for inflation, accounting for the full costs of Medicare reimbursements, and anticipating inevitable expenditures for natural disaster relief. The result of Obama’s openness is a budget that is $2.7 trillion deeper in the red over the next decade than it would otherwise appear. That debt was always there. It was just being hidden.
Posted by: Flash Override | December 24, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
So is it true that in Al Gore’s new book he has a map showing Cuba under water to demonstrate the affects oh GW? I heard Rush say that the sea would have to rise 6000 feet to cover Vuba and if it did Denver would also be under water!
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 24, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“Senate passes historic health bill”…….The Titanic was an historic vessel; The Hindenberg was an historic dirigible; & Obama is an historic President!
Posted by: pauldia | December 24, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Posted by: pauldia | Dec 24, 2009 4:14:30 PM
Let’s hope more of the house bill ends up in the final . . .
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Posted by: Flash Override | Dec 24, 2009 3:51:26 PM
Strong
Republicans take pride in accounting and statistical macrame.
Posted by: Skip | December 24, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Bush was the Titanic and the Hindenberg combined.
He overspent and cut taxes thus plunging the country further and further into debt every year of his presidency, leaving a $10 Trillion national debt for Obama.
He also left an economy in almost complete collapse; hundreds of thousands losing their jobs every month, major banks and financial instituions in collapse, the stock market collapsing, the deficit skyrocketing, foreclosers and bankruptcies through the roof.
Recovering from that mess is not going to be easy.
You want to talk about disasters – no better place to start.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
The result of Obama’s openness is a budget that is $2.7 trillion deeper in the red over the next decade than it would otherwise appear. That debt was always there. It was just being hidden.
Posted by: Flash Override |
Congress playing games with deficit numbers is the opposite of a news flash.
Your assertion that hiding deficits leads to understated of actual (not projected) debt is baffling.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 24, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“I heard Rush say that the sea would have to rise 6000 feet to cover [C]uba and if it did Denver would also be under water!”
That’s what happens when people listen to Rush. If he’s suggesting Cuba is on a plateau over a mile high he’s either an idiot or just being dishonest again as usual. It may be that he didn’t bother to look closely enough at Gore’s alleged map to notice some mountains sticking above the water, but I doubt it.
Posted by: Skip | December 24, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Obama is not much different from Bush. I am saying this as a Democrat. He has really sold America down the river with this health insurance bill. When I think of all the self righteous liberals who called Hillary supproters “racist” it makes me sick. Look what the Obots have stuck us with! Some guy who bows like a servant to foreign leaders and to his corporate masters.
Merry Christmas
Posted by: Bebee | December 24, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Its about time America joined the rest of the developed world and got some form of national health care!
Posted by: flashgames | December 24, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Obama is not much different from Bush.
Posted by: Bebee | Dec 24, 2009 7:13:22 PM
_______________________________
Good to hear! I guess the Republican right wingers will be flocking to the Democratic cause after reading your words!
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Good to hear! I guess the Republican right wingers will be flocking to the Democratic cause after reading your words!
Posted by: tierra |
And the Obots will quit their incessant whining about B-B-B-B-ush!
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 24, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Didn’t Hawaii have public health care until it became too outrageously expensive after about 8 months and they had to suspend the program?
Ghost of Christmas future!
Posted by: tj | December 24, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Maybe he’ll take advantage of his visit to clear up messy details of his early life narrative. In exactly what hospital or at what location was he born?
Posted by: tj | December 24, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Posted by: Skip | Dec 24, 2009 5:21:00 PM
I don’t know what’s going on with Gore’s book. This was a replay of Limbaugh’s program the day the PM from India was hanging out with BHO at the WH. Newsbusters has a story about Gore Photoshop-ing a satellite view of the earth and Florida almost under water. I was just wondering why Gore would have to publish a faked satellite picture. I guess the earth isn’t disintegrating fast enough for him.
If you have any actual information other than Rush-bashing get back to me.
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 24, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Nobody with a thinking brain is going to forget Bush bankrupted the country through overspending and tax cuts (raising the national debt to $10 trillion) – AND then overseeing the financial collapse of the country (“It’s just a rough patch”).
Posted by: tierra |
The facts are wrong, the arguments are disingenuous and the BDS whining is incessant.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 24, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
The facts are wrong, the arguments are disingenuous and the BDS whining is incessant.
_______________________________
Sorry, you can’t pretend it didn’t happen and you can’t pretend it isn’t still playing a major role in our current situation.
The Bush administration overspent and cut taxes plunging the country further and further into debt every year he was in power.
He also oversaw the collapse of the economy, hundreds of thousands of jobs lost each month, collapse of the stock markets, collapse of major financial institutions, skyrocketing foreclosures and bankruptcies . . . and so on.
“It’s just a rough patch” – George Bush.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
The Bush administration ran deficits for every year in office, but each year lower deficits until the Democrats took over both houses in 2007. Then the deficits increased seriously. When Mr. Obama took office in 2009, the first year deficit was larger than the deficit in every Bush year, combined! So if Bush’s deficits were bad, how are the ever so bigger Obama deficits good?
Posted by: tj | December 24, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
So if Bush’s deficits were bad, how are the ever so bigger Obama deficits good?
_____________________________________
It’s not at all difficult to figure out.
Bush bankrupted the country and oversaw the collapse of the economy – and all of this was left on the table for Obama. A $10 trillion deficit, a collapsed economy.
Do you have any idea what the collapse of the economy did to the tax base – and thus deficits?
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
He [Bush] also oversaw the collapse of the economy, hundreds of thousands of jobs lost each month, collapse of the stock markets, collapse of major financial institutions, skyrocketing foreclosures and bankruptcies . . . and so on.
Posted by: tierra | Dec 24, 2009 11:23:58 PM
“Two strange bedfellows have asked Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate President Obama’s right-hand man, chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, for his potential role in the near collapse of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
“The letter by Jane Hamsher, founder of the liberal Firedoglake Web site, and Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform Chief, was sent Wednesday, one day before the Treasury Department announced that it will lift the $400 billion financial cap on loans to the government-sponsored enterprises to make sure they stay afloat.” -FoxNews, 12/24/09
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 24, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It’s Saturday Night! | Dec 24, 2009 11:43:16 PM
Try not to worry about it; it was just a ‘rough patch’. Talk about being out of touch with reality.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Do you have any idea what the collapse of the economy did to the tax base – and thus deficits?
_____
So Mr. Obama double down on the spending, or tightened our collective belts and cut spending dramatically? Your answers are bordering on the ridiculous.
Posted by: tj | December 24, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Do you have any idea what the collapse of the economy did to the tax base – and thus deficits?
_____
So Mr. Obama double down on the spending, or tightened our collective belts and cut spending dramatically?
—————————–
You seem to have missed the point about what the crashing of the economy did to the tax base – Bush ran huge deficits every year of his presidency.
The collapse of the economy handed Obama not only the Bush deficits, but a huge automatic deficit – at a time when State budgets were also collapsing, unemployment benefit costs were going through the roof, hundreds of thousands of people were losing their jobs, their health care, their housing, etc.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Obama may end up in a league all his own!
Freddie/Fannie Bailouts & Salaries In Place
By: Teddy Partridge Thursday December 24, 2009 4:05 pm
Merry Xmas to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who got their credit limits upped considerably once the stock markets closed for the holiday. Also, their executives, whose strict “pay for performance” packages must make some GS-13 elves green with envy this Xmas Eve.
America’s stocking got a little leaner today, as our indebtedness increased astronomically. But since it’s being sold elsewhere as a boon for “poor people” and not a banker bailout, that’s fine.
StartQuote from Wapo “The Obama administration pledged on Thursday to back beleaguered mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac no matter how big their losses may be in the next three years.
“It also jettisoned a demand that the two companies cut the size of their mortgage-related investment portfolios next year, allowing them to provide even more support in the near term for a housing market recovering from its worst slump in decades.
“The Treasury Department said it made the changes to assure financial markets it stood firmly behind both companies and to buy more time for the two government-sponsored enterprises to whittle down their mortgage-related holdings.
EndQuote
Teddy continues…
“So what’s America’s exposure here, anyway?
$110,000,000,000 ??
Or…
$111,000,000,000 ??
Or…
$121,000,000,000 ??
Or…
$280,000,000,000 ??
Or…
$400,000,000,000 ??
Or…
$810,000,000,000 ??
Or…
“no matter how big their losses may be in the next three years” ??
Who knows? At least there won’t be any pesky Congressional approval required for whatever amount Fannie and Freddie need.
Happy holidaze from Bailout Nation!”
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 24, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
You seem to have missed the point about what the crashing of the economy did to the tax base – Bush ran huge deficits every year of his presidency.
________________________________
By the way, Bush’s deficits and the national debt he left Obama ARE going to have to be paid for by TAXES.
Posted by: tierra | December 24, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
“But Hamsher and Norquist want to know now whether the bailout was in part the result of corrupt practices by Emanuel while he was a board member at Freddie in 2000-2001.
“They cited a Chicago Tribune story that described a plan by the executives and the board to use accounting tricks to show shareholders they were reaping massive profits even as they continued down a path of risky investments. The profits were then used to justify the executives’ big bonuses. When Emanuel left the board to enter Congress in 2002, he was qualified for $380,000 in stock and options and $20,000 cash.
In their letter to Holder, Hamsher and Norquist added that the White House has stonewalled any inquiries into Emanuel’s role on the board, noting that the acting inspector general was “stripped of his authority earlier this year by the Justice Department, relying on a loophole in a bill Mr. Emanuel cosponsored and pushed through Congress shortly before he left for the White House.”" – Foxnews, 12/24/09
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It’s Saturday Night! | Dec 25, 2009 12:00:51 AM
Interesting accusations D.C. – but just that.
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
It’s not at all difficult to figure out.
Bush bankrupted the country and oversaw the collapse of the economy – and all of this was left on the table for Obama. A $10 trillion deficit, a collapsed economy.
Do you have any idea what the collapse of the economy did to the tax base – and thus deficits?
Posted by: tierra
The facts are wrong, the arguments are disingenuous and the BDS whining is incessant.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 25, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
It’s not at all difficult to figure out.
Bush bankrupted the country and oversaw the collapse of the economy – and all of this was left on the table for Obama. A $10 trillion deficit, a collapsed economy.
Do you have any idea what the collapse of the economy did to the tax base – and thus deficits?
________________________________
Sorry, it happened – we all are. You can’t wish it away.
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
$10 Trillion + national debt, and annual deficits written in . ..
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
At least there won’t be any pesky Congressional approval required for whatever amount Fannie and Freddie need.
Happy holidaze from Bailout Nation!”
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It’s Saturday Night! |
Phony and Fraudie. Brought to you by your US government, makers of Obamacare. Our motto is “Doing for the health care system what we’ve done for public education”.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 25, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
RCP Average Direction of Country
Right Direction: 35.9%
Wrong Track: 56.9%
Spread: -21.0%
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
“The Obama family is spending Christmas and New Years in President Obama’s native Hawaii and the schedule for the next few days has no public events. Obama has no “home” church in Honolulu from his youth, and the Obamas have only attended church services in Washington three times in the past year.
“The Obama family quit Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ during the presidential campaign because of the controversies surrounding the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. So you may wonder, will the Obamas attend church services on Christmas? What will he be doing in Hawaii between now and Jan. 3, when the family is scheduled to return?
“Church seems iffy. Golf seems certain, based on past vacations and the Chicago friends who will be with him in Hawaii.” – Lynn Sweet, Politics Daily, 12/24/09
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
RCP Average Direction of Country
Spread: -21.0%
________________________________
That’s way better than it was at the end of the last administration when the spread was commonly in the -31 to -40 range.
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
“Church seems iffy. Golf seems certain”
RICK WARREN: Now, let’s deal with abortion; 40 million abortions since Roe v. Wade. As a pastor, I have to deal with this all of the time, all of the pain and all of the conflicts. I know this is a very complex issue. Forty million abortions, at what point does a baby get human rights, in your view?
BARACK OBAMA: Well, you know, I think that whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade.
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am
You seem to have missed the point about what the crashing of the economy did to the tax base…
So Mr. Obama, realizing the tax base war going to be dramatically lower …
a. Cut spending to compensate, lowered taxes to encourage economic activity to repair the tax base…
b. Spent like there was no tomorrow, thereby more than doubling the deficit, sucking up all available capital and undermining economic activity, thus further weakening the tax base.
Posted by: tj | December 25, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
“Now, in an unexpected move, Obama has told White House aides that instead of joining a congregation in Washington, D.C., he will follow in George W. Bush’s footsteps and make his primary place of worship Evergreen Chapel, the nondenominational church at Camp David.
“A number of factors drove the decision — financial, political, personal — but chief among them was the desire to worship without being on display. Obama was reportedly taken aback by the circus stirred up by his visit to 19th Street Baptist in January. Lines started forming three hours before the morning service, and many longtime members were literally left out in the cold as the church filled with outsiders eager to see the new President. Even at St. John’s, which is so accustomed to presidential visitors that it is known as the “Church of the Presidents,” worshippers couldn’t help themselves from snapping photos of Obama on their camera phones as they walked down the aisle past him to take communion.
“The challenge of not only being part of a church community but also praying in peace has long been a problem for Presidents, according to historian Carl Sferrazza Anthony.”
TIME
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
The collapse of the economy handed Obama not only the Bush deficits, but a huge automatic deficit – at a time when State budgets were also collapsing, unemployment benefit costs were going through the roof, hundreds of thousands of people were losing their jobs, their health care, their housing, etc.
__________________________________
In other words, in times of extreme economic collapse the demands on the government resources reach all-time highs.
Every industrialized western nation has instituted deficit funding, tax cuts and stimulus funding in attempting to save themselves from complete economic collapse.
It is VERY unfortunate, the Bush administration chose to overspend and under tax – he passed on a huge national debt, and a built-in huge deficit to the current President.
And he handed the current President an economy in ruins.
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Opening para of ‘It’s Our Time Now,’ from the amazingly articulate 17 year old Jackie from her blog Red, White & Conservative, 12/22/09
“The Founders spent endless days fighting over a vision for this nation. Our grandparents fought to keep it free for us. Men and women continue to fight on our behalf today. Our parents do everything in their power to make our lives pleasant. But it’s time we take matters into our own hands. I’m talking to the youth of America. As I sit here writing this my mind is whirling about with thoughts of what is going on in this country and my heart is heavy. I am just one of a growing number. A growing number young people concerned about their futures. We come from all backgrounds, beliefs, and economic standings. But we all share one thing in common, we love America. We love America and have a similar vision. Our parents have taught us morals and ideals but we also have some thoughts of our own.”
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
“The church at Camp David is Evergreen Chapel, a nondenominational body currently led by Chaplain Lieut. Carey Cash. Each week, regardless of whether the President is on-site, Evergreen Chapel holds Christian services open to the nearly 400 military personnel and staff at Camp David, as well as their families. The Bush family spent eight straight Christmases at Camp David, in large part because of the retreat’s privacy, and were regular attenders of the chapel’s candlelight service on Christmas Eve.” TIME
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am
“They may miss singing carols and reading the Christmas story in the book of Luke, at least in a formal church setting, but after entertaining 50,000 house guests, all the First Family must really want for Christmas is some peace and quiet.” TIME
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am
It’s come to this:
Senator Robert Byrd (D-West Virginia) is quoting Arab proverbs: “An Old Arab proverb says, ‘He who has health has hope, and he who has hope has everything.’”
Posted by: Live! From D.C.! It's Saturday Night! | December 25, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
It’s come to this:
Senator Robert Byrd (D-West Virginia) is quoting Arab proverbs
________________________________
And this is important because . . . ?
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Tierra, to finish your story… and then Obama was elected to office and he continued the massive spending, except he put it on a faster speed. He shamed exec’s after giving them tons of taxpayers dollars…geeeee that scolding must have hurt. (small price for my money.) BUT, not to be distracted by the unemployment or the economy, Obama proceeded on his Health Care massive spending spree! Boy, I’m sure he’ll get around to cutting out those earmarks….but he just hasn’t gotten around to it….we’re not bankrupt yet…so he continues merrily spending into 2010.
Posted by: Sherrie | December 25, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am
….we’re not bankrupt yet…so he continues merrily spending into 2010.
____________________________________
Every industrialized western nation has instituted deficit funding, tax cuts and stimulus funding in attempting to save themselves from complete economic collapse.
It is VERY unfortunate, the Bush administration chose to overspend and under tax – he passed on a huge national debt, and a built-in huge deficit to the current President.
And he handed the current President an economy in ruins.
p.s. – in case you missed it, the health care legislation before the senate actually reduces the deficit . .. also, TARP was put in place under the previous administration . .
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Every industrialized western nation has instituted deficit funding, tax cuts and stimulus funding in attempting to save themselves from complete economic collapse.
It is VERY unfortunate, the Bush administration chose to overspend and under tax – he passed on a huge national debt, and a built-in huge deficit to the current President.
And he handed the current President an economy in ruins.
p.s. – in case you missed it, the health care legislation before the senate actually reduces the deficit . .. also, TARP was put in place under the previous administration . .
Posted by: tierra |
The facts are wrong, the arguments are disingenuous and the BDS whining is incessant.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 25, 2009, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Every industrialized western nation has instituted deficit funding, tax cuts and stimulus funding in attempting to save themselves from complete economic collapse.
It is VERY unfortunate, the Bush administration chose to overspend and under tax – he passed on a huge national debt, and a built-in huge deficit to the current President.
And he handed the current President an economy in ruins.
p.s. – in case you missed it, the health care legislation before the senate actually reduces the deficit . .. also, TARP was put in place under the previous administration . .
Posted by: tierra |
The facts are wrong, the arguments are disingenuous and the BDS whining is incessant.
_________________________________
Sure they are, all the facts are wrong . .. and you’ve done a non-existent job of challenging them . . .
Posted by: tierra | December 25, 2009, 4:54 am 4:54 am
My old pappy who was born before the great depression always said that this country needed to hit the bottem every few years so we could start over. So Obama is just helping it hit the bottem a little sooner with all of his spending. I’m glad it’s a black man doing it, its about time they did something for their country.
Posted by: Dirty-Daug | December 25, 2009, 6:54 am 6:54 am
Spending, spending, wasteful spending, and earmarks….started in the Bush administration continues on speed in the Obama administration. Responsible Americans will vote Obama out of office and he deserves it. Earmarks, earmarks, earmarks….come get your earmarks. Obama the candidate…”I’ll eliminate earmarks”. What a liar. Earmarks, earmarks, earmarks…come little piggies.
Posted by: Sherrie | December 26, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
“I’ll eliminate earmarks”
Posted by: Sherrie | Dec 26, 2009 1:34:36 PM
_________________________________
Just to correct that, Obama didn’t say he would eliminate earmarks. In fact, he said earmarks serve a reasonable purpose, but have been misused. He did commit to going through budgets line by line.
Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 3:54 am 3:54 am