By Jennifer Parker

Dec 27, 2009 11:07am

Krugman: ‘Reasonably High Chance’ the Economy Will Contract

Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman said he thinks there’s a “reasonably high chance” the economy will contract in the second half of next year. 


On the “This Week” Roundtable, Krugman said he agreed with the assessment of fellow Nobel-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz that there is a significant chance the economy will shrink in 2010.  


“I would go with Joseph Stiglitz,” Krugman added, “I’m really worried about the second half.”

User Comments

“Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman said he thinks there’s a “reasonably high chance” the economy will contract in the second half of next year.”
Well, duh.

Posted by: Jenn | December 27, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Don’t worry, Barry the Lyin Hawaiian says all is well.There is a glimmer of hope though as the only reason Slugman won this crappy award was like ABC’s Hero BO a lib. Be a lib win awards from
lib award groups,easy as that.

Posted by: Media Whore's the Cult of the Boy Wonder. | December 27, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Nice job at stating the obvious Paul. Just print every tax payer a cool million. Then we can have inflation instead of deflation. A little trickle up economics is in order instead of the trickle down nonsense you folks in power have given us.

Posted by: Huh | December 27, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Paul Krugman was the one who supported a government spending to stimulate the economy until the deficit hit 10 trillion or more if I am not mistaken. I am no economist but I do have a common sense to realize that deficit that high will never make the recurring recession go away.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | December 27, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

These are tough economic times and we have a struggling President.
Wish we had an economist/businessman instead of a lawyer………….
I can not believe they are even considering raising taxes right now to support the Health Care Plan.

Posted by: donbl1 | December 27, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Wait a minute Paul Krugman! Just because Nobel-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz thinks that there is a significant chance the economy could contract in 2010, what makes you think you’re any smarter than Turbo Tim?

Posted by: LongT | December 27, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

“I can not believe they are even considering raising taxes right now to support the Health Care Plan.”
It gets better. CNN reported today:
“When members of the U.S. Senate finally head home, they will be leaving the future of 50 individual and business tax breaks in limbo. All expire at the end of 2009.
Among the disappearing breaks are the research tax credit and an annual alternative minimum tax “patch,” which keeps 23 million additional middle-income Americans from being forced into calculating and paying the dreaded AMT. (For 2009, with the patch in place, 4 million upper-middle- and high-income families will pay AMT.)”
We don’t know which tax breaks will be extended, so taxpayers and businesses are in limbo until next year. That’s exactly what you want…more uncertainty when businesses are already reluctant to hire.
But, hey, at least the Senate was able to get that healthcare reform bill passed on Christmas Eve in the dark of night with no transparency. You know, the one that takes effect in 2014. Healthcare is a crisis!! Unemployment? Not so much.
Is this the Change you voted for, America?

Posted by: Jenn | December 27, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Even us non-Nobel prize winning simple minded business people do not like what we see coming up ahead for 2010. We have to get through the commerical loan issues at the banks, have some knowledge as to what NEW TAXES and job killing regulations we are going to get and finally the government at some point has to get out of the home loan business.
all of these are going to be a drag on the economy.

Posted by: scott jeffries | December 27, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

M; Well articulated! Your argument is compelling! Why bother if you just are going to post the same old adolescent rant?

Posted by: LongT | December 27, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Oh, well if the former Enron economic adviser Paul Krugman says it’s true, then it must be.

Posted by: CH | December 27, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Printing this without any explanation is poor reporting. It would be nice to know what signs to look for.
Higher oil prices? Higher inflation? High inventories?

Posted by: The_Mick | December 27, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

We are witnessing first-hand that Keynesian Economics–a theory that the government can stimulate economic growth by intervening in the private sector–is an absolute FAILURE. And yet Obama, Reid, and Pelosi continue to pile on more and more debt, even as Americans are screaming at them to stop.
There’s a point where foreign investors will no longer buy our debt. China is already warning they are reluctant to buy more of our debt. If that happens, we can either print money to service our debt or we default. We’ll print money. The resulting inflation will devastate the working poor and middle class.
Want a glimpse at our future? Look at Detroit.

Posted by: Jenn | December 27, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Obama is a one term president.

Posted by: CW | December 27, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I would think that the Obama administration is not having a “duh” moment with Krugman’s comments.
The Obama administration has spent a boatload of money in the form of the Stimulus plan to get the economy on its collective feet as it were. The idea was to reach out past 18 months. If you are going to spend up to $800 Billion it seems to me you might want to get some mileage out of it.
That’s a guess on my part but, then again, we have moved from treating it all as monopoly money to the realization that in spite of the unlimited supply of the stuff it actually has real value in the world (at least for the time being).
The rest of us may be saying “duh” – I’m thinking that the Obama administration is going “ut oh – this is not a good thing.”

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | December 27, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Stimulus = economic growth = jobs = tax revenue = shrinking deficit.
I think that’s simple enough that even Jenn can understand.

Posted by: Susie Madrak | December 27, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“Stimulus = economic growth = jobs = tax revenue = shrinking deficit.”
LOL!
Google “US National Debt Clock Real Time”

Posted by: Jenn | December 27, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Who ever “Jenn” is … is spot on. read all the posts. They are good.

Posted by: cfiman | December 27, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Susie Madrak – I must disagree with your last post. We can only keep this going as long as people credit us funds based on the good faith that we will pay of our debt someday with money that is not too debased.

Posted by: Huh | December 27, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Does anyone think that we would have been better off with John McCain, who said that he would’ve let the big banks fail, and who demonstrated a very chaotic and shoot-first-etc management style during the campaign?
I hate and am disgusted by what was done for the likes of AIG and GS and how they have turned around and bent over in our direction as a “thank you”, but I think the horse was already out of the barn as far as choices went at the time. If not for “Barry the lyin Hawaiian” and his buddies Timmy and Benny, I for one am pretty sure that myself and my wife and my 4 kids would be out on the street.
Yes, he may be a one term president (no based on the apparent alternatives so far), but that is in part due to some very difficult decisions he was forced to make. Give him that, at least.

Posted by: Steve From NH | December 27, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Paul I’m going to disagree with you on this one.
I highly doubt that the economy will contract.
In fact I beleive that the economy will do exactly the opposite.
Saving has increased to the highest point in over a decade. People aren’t going to save forever. Eventually people will cave in and spend more. The stock markets are back up by 40% as the stock markets get higher and higher up people who depend on those funds for retirement will become more and more lax on their hoarding of those funds and start spending more freely.
This poorly written article could have pointed out why Paul stated this other than it being a gut feeling.

Posted by: GM from MN | December 27, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

The federal government will need to refinance 3 Trillion dollars of existing debt and purchase and additional 1.5 Trillion dollars to fund the projected deficit for this year. If the healthcare plan passes new taxes will be levied on American businesses, which will further erode the jobs market. The Obama administration is also promising to rescind the Bush tax cuts, which equates to yet higher taxes for American businesses.
Sounds like a recipe for disaster.

Posted by: Jenny | December 27, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I don’t need a Nobel prize in economics to predict that this economy ain’t goin’ anywhere as long as Barack Baloney continues to spend money we don’t have on nonsense programs, like the alleged “health care” bill, cap and trade hooey, and “stimulus” plans that are in reality payoffs for his supporters.
Ask yourself: Why would any business be hiring, with new regulations and taxes about to be foisted onto them? Why would they expand when consumer spending is down? Why would they keep employees on when their profit margins have been drastically reduced?
Paul Krugman is an idiot. BUT – - an idiot with a Nobel prize. Sound familiar?

Posted by: OverTheCoastline | December 27, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

I am President of a local financial instituition. Yes, 2010 looks very weak. The option ARM loans will reset in 2010 and many of those will fail. My home state of California has not resolved the budget mess which means thousands of state employees will lose their jobs. The state budget woes will roll down into the city, county and school districts and force more layoffs there. Congress is busy passing legislation that will harm financial instituitons at time when we can’t absorb hits to our non-interest income. We are facing record loan defaults that were caused by the big banks reckless lending (they made the option ARM loans). Congress has laid the ground work for the next disaster by allowing the big banks to merge Merrila Lynch, Countrywide, Wachovia, WAMU, and all the rest. Congress is the cause of the great recession and will be the cause of the next recession. They are the best that money can buy.

Posted by: Credit Man | December 27, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Who ever “Jenn” is … is spot on. read all the posts

That is hilarious, as I did browse through the posts. Its actually supply side economics that has proven not to be the cure for all ills, the answers to everything, particularly deflationary recessions– and those who understand economics recognize the need for flexibility when it comes to applying theory. I was glad to see Jake quote Bruce Bartlett today. Those on the right who cling to a rigid ideology rather than being practical and applying a full menu of ideas to present circumstances, should familiarize themselves with his observations.
A lot of the thinking in the comments represents exactly what the Republican commentators on the show today were talking about when it comes to their prediction that conservatives will totally misread the tea leaves,and get the wrong message from possible election results in 2010. Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

Posted by: progressive mama | December 27, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

has anyone noticed how libs dont respect ANY institution, be it the presidency (look how BO flaunts it, lies from the podium, treats other world leaders like excrement), science (as climategate showed), marraige (they want to degradate with same sex unions),media is no longer unbiased, lib judges twisting the law, perverting the Constitution, list goes on and on. they will do anything, say anything to get their radical agenda implemented. It scares me.. I mean these clowns swore to uphold the Constitution, and do what was best for the people. I frankly cant beleive anything. Does anyone beleive our economy is improving?? stock brokers are manipulating it, no doubt i think it’s all bad and we should all prepare for the worst.

Posted by: realman1963 | December 27, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Obama has frightened business leaders to the point that they will not hire until there is a clear change in policy. That might come in 2010 if the Democrats lose control of the house or it might come in 2012 when Obama loses his reelection bid. Either way, 2010 will be a very difficult year because of the lack of confidence in the current administration.
For those who track shipping and freight as a harbinger of future economic activity you no doubt know that we have not seen any recovery signs yet; all we have is a temporary sugar high caused by massive deficit spending on the federal level (last quarter GDP was +2.2 with +2.4 being from deficit spending).
Finally, 2010 will be a year where the second leg of the mortgage crisis hits. We will also see commercial real estate failures accelerate.
Obama has done nothing to prevent the impending crash and is in fact actively pursuing policies that are designed to re-inflate the bubble in real estate that causes the underlying problems in our economy.

Posted by: Curt | December 27, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

“Saving has increased to the highest point in over a decade. People aren’t going to save forever. Eventually people will cave in and spend more.”
Unemployment is increasing, not decreasing. Thousands of manufacturing jobs continue to be outsourced. Many who have found new jobs are working for less money–sometimes much less. There is no spending and no recovery if households can’t increase their incomes and get their debt under control. Period.

Posted by: Jenn | December 27, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Consumer confidence is so badly shaken that I can’t see a real turnaround during Obama’s tenure. Business is permenantly learning how to do more with less, and fewer. The Middle Class will have to lower their standards for the foreseable future. Retirement will be remembered as a quaint concept of yesteryear, except for those few with a boarding-house reach and few restraints.

Posted by: Joe | December 27, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Not sure why this was worth a blog entry. Paul Krugman has his own little soapbox on the NYT from which he can and does say anything that occurs to his mind, which is economically sound in the area of foreign trade but deranged and small on domestic issues.

Posted by: Chiara | December 27, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Obama will have a second term, and Democrats will win more seats in 2010. The American people, in the majority, are astute enough to know that this President has made the hard choices. He inherited massive problems, and rather than try to please his constituents to assure re-election he chose America over politics.
It does not matter what the right screams, or what they think as they are now irrelevant. The Republican philosophy and ideology FAILED massively and has pretty much destroyed America. Do Republicans seriously believe we will all fall for their lies and misrepresentations again? Not likely!
There are many Liberals and Democrats who are disappointed that the ideals they believe in have not been as forthcoming as they wished, but once the dust settles they will see that the steps that have been taken, despite Republican obstructionism, are a giant step in the right direction, and that giving Obama another four years to continue cleaning up after the Republicans is the smarter move.

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

What Krugman is concerned about in the second half of the year is the ARM’s due to reset in the second half of 2010. It’s resulting impact will be even more devastating than the original crash in late 2008.
Obama has completely misread the economy and has instead attempted to “let no crisis go to waste”. Unfortunately for us his attempts to expand government and taxation through the nationalization of healthcare has destroyed confidence in his leadership and will lead to the next leg down into an even deeper recession.

Posted by: Alicia | December 27, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

realman…You and the other Conservatives can continue to lie to each other. Obama can never do anything right in your mind because you are still part of the failed conservative philosophy. Basically, what you think does not matter.

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

“Obama will have a second term, and Democrats will win more seats in 2010. The American people, in the majority, are astute enough to know that this President has made the hard choices. He inherited massive problems, and rather than try to please his constituents to assure re-election he chose America over politics.”
Rasmussen:
“The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll, released Thursday, shows that 27% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-three percent (43%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -16.
Fifty-six percent (56%) now disapprove of the President’s performance.
Most voters (55%) oppose the health care legislation working its way through Congress. Those who feel strongly about the legislation are overwhelmingly opposed to it. Most voters favor a ban on coverage of abortion in any insurance plan subsidized by the federal government. Most voters (54%) also believe they personally will be worse off if the health care plan passes. Just 25% think they will be better off. A commentary by Michael Barone notes that it been more than 150 years since such significant but unpopular legislation was passed through Congress on a partisan basis.
Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the economy is getting better while 47% say it’s getting worse. Just 29% say the United States is heading in the right direction. Republicans have opened their largest advantage yet on the Generic Congressional Ballot.”

Posted by: Mary | December 27, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Obama has frightened business leaders to the point that they will not hire until there is a clear change in policy. >>>>>>>
If we dont like what you are doing we will come in with our czars and take over. That emits confidence doesnt it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Obama has done nothing to prevent the impending crash and is in fact actively pursuing policies that are designed to re-inflate the bubble in real estate that causes the underlying problems in our economy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I agree completely. Never have I seen someone in such a hurry to make a bigger mess than we were just in.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 27, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

A challenge to Conservatives…
Provide the name of at least two main stream economist, who are not part of Faux News, that disagrees with the basics of what this administration has done in response to the inherited economic problems.
A contraction in the economy, or a second leg down, is still preferable to the alternative, which was a full blown depression.

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

realman1963 | Dec 27, 2009 1:34:38 PM
_______________________________________
Democrats will increase their numbers in Congress to the point that Republicans will start talking about revolution because idiots as they are, they hate to accept the fact that they are nothing but losers. Since Obama took over they have been undermining the process of governing.
They had the country in their hands for eight years and still they refuse to rcognize that they run the country into the ground. Do you really think the American people will give you a sencond chance?

Posted by: garcia | December 27, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Rasmussen is a Right Wing Polling Company. Their polls are always extremely slanted to the right. And, no matter what, intelligent Americans will win the day.
In addition, read the Rasmuseen pool questions. You will see how slanted and unspecific the questions are. Some even guide to a predisposed answer.
………………..
“Obama will have a second term, and Democrats will win more seats in 2010. The American people, in the majority, are astute enough to know that this President has made the hard choices. He inherited massive problems, and rather than try to please his constituents to assure re-election he chose America over politics.”
Rasmussen:
“The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll, released Thursday, shows that 27% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-three percent (43%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -16.
Fifty-six percent (56%) now disapprove of the President’s performance.
Most voters (55%) oppose the health care legislation working its way through Congress. Those who feel strongly about the legislation are overwhelmingly opposed to it. Most voters favor a ban on coverage of abortion in any insurance plan subsidized by the federal government. Most voters (54%) also believe they personally will be worse off if the health care plan passes. Just 25% think they will be better off. A commentary by Michael Barone notes that it been more than 150 years since such significant but unpopular legislation was passed through Congress on a partisan basis.
Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the economy is getting better while 47% say it’s getting worse. Just 29% say the United States is heading in the right direction. Republicans have opened their largest advantage yet on the Generic Congressional Ballot.”

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

It is amazing how the Right continues their lies…
These results are from real Clear Polotics Poll Averages. Please note how the poster who referred to Rasmusseen lied about the results. A typical conservative:
Obama Approval Ratings:
RCP Average 12/6 – 12/23 – 49.5 45.1 +4.4
Rasmussen Reports 12/21 – 12/23 1500 LV 44 56 -12

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

The Associated Press Poll on Obama’s Approval Rating: (The Associated Press is considered one of the fairest polls in their question make up and in their polling techniques.)
Associated Press/GfK 12/10 – 12/14 1001 A 56 42 +14
56% Approve
42% Disapprove
If something does not fit the conservative agenda they just lie about it.

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Krugman has been wrong on nearly every count since President Obama was elected. Krugman has been against the administration ever since they didn’t annoint him the economic guru for the country. The economy may falter and if it does, he’ll probably take credit. If it doesn’t, he’ll take credit for warning everyone. He’s a economist….they’re good at predicting the past, but lousy at predicting the future.

Posted by: alwriter60 | December 27, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

A real patriotic American that damaged this country would apologize and try to right their wrongs. Does this sound like the Republicans/Conservatives to you? Conservatives continue their failed philosophy and lie about everything.

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Hey Rob, 50% of Detroit is unemployed and they have a record number of homeless. Go poll them.

Posted by: Jenn | December 27, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Hey Rob, 50% of Detroit is unemployed and they have a record number of homeless. Go poll them.
_____________________________________
And you would have preferred the Obama administration let the american auto industry completely collapse?

Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

tierra..
I would be glad to poll the auto workers of Detroit. They know where they would be without Obama. 100% unemployment.

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

jenn… Another Conservative lie about Detroit…
From The Bureau OF Labor Statistics:
Of the 49 metropolitan areas with a Census 2000 population of 1 million
or more, Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., reported the highest unemploy-
ment rate in October, 16.7 percent.
As I said, if it does not fit the Conservative agenda they just lie.

Posted by: Rob | December 27, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

A real patriotic American that damaged this country would apologize and try to right their wrongs. Does this sound like the Republicans/Conservatives to you? Conservatives continue their failed philosophy and lie about everything.
_______________________________________
It’s too bad Bush couldn’t have left the country in better shape.
One would like to think that as a President you leave the country healthier than when you were elected.
Unfortunately, it was exactly the opposite with Bush and his Republican administration.
The national debt was doubled, the deficit was skyrocketing, and the economy was in virtual free-fall collapse.

Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Another big fish is commercial real estate. All those big empty offices. No tenants and big loans not being paid. Until these debts are flushed out of the system we will be in limbo. Must be difficult for the government because if they do give the people cash they’ll turn around and buy Chinese garbage — its the only choice we have for most products. Might as well put up the tariffs but the globalists will go bonkers and I could care less.

Posted by: jablabla | December 27, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Must be difficult for the government because if they do give the people cash they’ll turn around and buy Chinese garbage — its the only choice we have for most products.
______________________________________
There actually are lots of American choices – g**gle American made products, or something similar and you’ll have lots to research.
Regrettably, not many Americans really think about buying national products.

Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

As a point of comparison, when Reagan took office the unemployment rate was at 7.5% and got worse for 2 FULL years hitting a high of 10.8%.
It then levelled off at about 10% for six more months before slowly beginning to decrease.

Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Obviously poor reporting, but my guess is Krugman’s prediction is based on his view that a 2nd stimulus is needed (way too early to even discuss)and on his alarmist tendencies-which sometimes are correct-SEE Bursting of Housing Bubble, Now for the facts & the future: consumer confidence is increasing (UofM survey), unemployment rate has fallen, GDP up 2.2% in 3rd, expected to be up 3-4% in 4th, well over half of stimulus has not even been spent yet, rollback of over 80% of amount of Bush tax cuts affects less than 10% of taxpayers, has little effect on small businesses as only their owners pay taxes on what they choose to take out of the business for thmeselves (and only affects owners who take out $250K+ for themselves, $150K+ if single); big business has 50% more cash than ever-adjusted for inflation-so it will either pay down the deficit or start spending it. As for the dollar, its recent rise, altho likely temporary, shows it’s not in free fall, its general weakness has helped to reduce trade deficit, and as almost all economists view deflation as a greater threat than inflation, the real value of the dollar is stable. 3Q GDP shows Keynesian economic theory works, and the Baltic Dry Index has risen from below 1000 to 3000 this year-with most of tis recent decline caused by the rising dollar. Healthcare legislation will reduce costs for those small businesses already providing coverage for employees, but not by nearly as much as would be the case with a public option. My prediction: the rate of growth in the 2nd half of 2010 will slow to about 2% from its 4% rate in the 1st half, unemployment will drop to about 8.5%, and Dems will lose fewer than avg seats in House in off-year election, but retain comfortable majorities in both houses.

Posted by: Jim | December 27, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

The stock market is up 60% from the March lows. This is a clear indication that the country has faith in the current administration. The stock market is the only concrete forward looking measure we have, and it says that Obama is doing a good job of turning this economy around (that Bush left him in shambles).
And don’t tell me its only liberals that are investing in this Obama market! You “conservatives” make me laugh. Bad mouthing the Obama administration publicly, but privately profiting off the 60% Obama stock market bounce. I love it!

Posted by: Eric | December 27, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

You called Paul Krugman an idiot!? Where does that put someone of your economic calibre?*********
Paul Krugman is an idiot. BUT – - an idiot with a Nobel prize. Sound familiar?
Posted by: OverTheCoastline@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
kRUGMAN, AN IDIOT! rotflamo @ U.
secreg_756

Posted by: SECREG_756 | December 27, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

You called Paul Krugman an idiot!? Where does that put someone of your economic calibre?*********
Paul Krugman is an idiot. BUT – - an idiot with a Nobel prize. Sound familiar?
Posted by: OverTheCoastline@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
kRUGMAN, AN IDIOT! rotflamo @ U.
secreg_756

Posted by: SECREG666 | December 27, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Happy to see Stephanopolis going… How about Terry Moran for Georges Job? Terry is top flight! I am with tierra. Obama cannot cut and/or tax the influx of Chinese goods even though it would help immeasurably. Larry Summers would immediately put a real gun with real bullets to our poor President’s head with the real intent to kill the poor fellow. Failing the first option Geithner would. Funny what people will do for money.
I recommend a grass roots boycott of all Chinese goods. Hard to do but possible. You may not be able to be a purist and get it all but you could get a lot of it. Keep a journal and you may be surprised that you can get over 50% of your purchases from the U.S.A.
The Chinese are not playing on a level playing field. Their currency is inflated and will stay as such no matter how much we complain. There is no way in the world that I can compete with an 18 yr. old Chinese worker that works 6 days a week for $2.00 per hour. Boycott the Chinese and restore manufacturing jobs in our country. this is the only way I can see us getting a job filled recovery.

Posted by: Dave from Milwaukee | December 27, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

I listen to the republicans opinions on the economy the same way I listen to my 10 yr. old nephews opinions on the economy. I listen carefully and respectfully. If he is right I encourage him. If he is wrong I correct him calmly and carefully so as to not offend or hurt his fragile feelings and go on doing what needs doing. I can put no real time or effort in arguing the fine points with a person that is hooked in to a fact free faith based method of follow the leader.
When I look at the last 8 years or even the 4 years when the Republicans ran the whole show I think that I need proffer no further example of why I and my country can afford no further time, money or patience practicing the same old broken Republican ideas

Posted by: Dave from Milwaukee | December 27, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Most of what stopped the GDP from falling a fourth straight quarter was the infusion of money into the economy by the government.
Technically, we can fall back into a recession for 9 more months. Recession is defined as 3 consecutive quarters of no or very low growth. Whew, 9 recession free months coming up, really?
Banks have plenty of money to lend. Why should they? Using money to make money is a better bet and creates higher potential returns than lending. That’s is why it’s so hard to get a loan. Lending money is not the best way for banks to make money. Glass-Staegal act saw that and for many years kept brokerage houses from being lenders and Banks from selling securities. Thank Bill Clinton very much for allowing the G-S act to be stricken. Also much thanks to Lindsay Graham and Bill Clinton on behalf of deregulating the commodities industry. Prior to deregulation commodities could only be traded while the NYSE was open. Now it’s a free for all and commodities are traded 24/7 world wide. talk of lack of supervision. This was equivalent to handing a bottle of Jack Daniels and the keys to the Corvette to your son. Nothing good will come from it. The stock market is an entity unto itself. It does not reflect the real economy in the world. Wall strreters take OPM and turn that into great wealth fro themselves and in most instances their investors. Wall Street does not create jobs. Nor is it an indicator job growth is coming soon. Wall Streeters, like Bankers make money from money trading in different investment vehicles at different times. I believe Krugman is absolutely correct. Unless, Obama throws another Trillion into the economy we are headed down. Remember it was WW11 which took us out of the 2ND great depression. After FDR died. Hoover cut the cash spigot and had it not been for WW2, who knows what would have happened.
SECREG666

Posted by: SECREG666 | December 27, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

The left over TARP funds should be used to charter a Bank of the United States. The bank would lend at 2 points–and only 2–over what it paid on interest bearing checking. This would represent a financial public option and would NOT REQUIRE Congressional approval.

Posted by: Robert | December 27, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Shame on Krugman. He of all people should know that it is leadership that generates the enthusiasm and creativity of the people. In that he is a personal failure. Krugman’s shifted too much to the right in an attempt to maintain his little seat as a Sunday Morning talking head. And Newt Gingrich, what a cow. Remind me again what he’s in charge of and why we should listen to him about anything?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 27, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Why would anyone be worried?
Surely Democrat plans to raise taxes, increase regulation, encourage unionization, increase energy costs, micromanage the economy, place the health care industry under federal control, and borrow every available dollar in the world should encourage hiring and growth!

Posted by: Doc | December 27, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

“Surely Democrat plans to raise taxes”
___________________________________
Democrats will probably have no choice.
The previous President cut taxes and grossly overspent – plunging the country further and further in debt every year of his presidency. The national debt was doubled on his watch.
This national debt will have to be paid for by taxes – where did Bush think it would come from?
Then the economy crashed on his watch.
(Dealing with the near depression left by Bush is an entirely additional matter.)

Posted by: tierra | December 27, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

We are setting the stage for another big drop in our economy. Much like during the Great Depression, we will see slight upticks followed by more forceful contractions. Also like the onset of the Great Depression the stock marked has recovered on speculation but there is simply no basis for the increase.
Unfortuantely, Obama is making the same mistakes that FDR made. Even more unfortunate is that we start this downturn with a national debt that nearly equals our GDP and a president that has run up a deficit that hit $1.4 trillion last year and is expected to hit $1.5 trillion this year.
If you do not have a close relationship with your family or your church now is the time to mend them. We will all need their help to weather the coming storm.

Posted by: Barry | December 27, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Here we go again, lets blame someone else, namely Bush. In reality we can all blame ourselves to a certain extent, we had a cooperative government looking the other way while banks made crappy loans;real estate agents loved it,builders and suppliers loved it,developers and bankers loved it because uncle sam was guaranteeing the loans and they could make a killing by packaging them as “good stuff”, with a US Gov guarantee. Then you have people sitting on the board of fannie and freddie, people like Rahm Emanuel getting tidy fees for his services, Senators getting “sweetheart”loans and other politicians using this “easy money” as a way to buy votes.
So as those who wait around for healthcare 4 years from now tell me how you like paying for something in advance before you get it and how you like Congress passing laws that “just don’t apply to them” and more importantly how do you like bankers getting bailed out while many do without jobs and a means of support.

Posted by: david | December 27, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Tierra Said: “As a point of comparison, when Reagan took office the unemployment rate was at 7.5% and got worse for 2 FULL years hitting a high of 10.8%. It then levelled off at about 10% for six more months before slowly beginning to decrease.”
Dave from Milwaukee Said: “I listen to the republicans opinions on the economy the same way I listen to my 10 yr. old nephews opinions on the economy.”
Eric Said: “The stock market is the only concrete forward looking measure we have, and it says that Obama is doing a good job of turning this economy around (that Bush left him in shambles).”
=======================================
SEVERAL SMART COMMENTS ON THIS BOARD, BUT THESE 3 ARE THE SMARTEST OF THEM ALL!
GO BACK AND LOOK AT HISTORY FOLKS:
(1) FDR’S “ALPHABET SOUP” PROGRAMS AND WORLD WAR II (BOTH MASSIVE GOVERNMENT SPENDING)… ARE WHAT GOT US OUT OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION.
(2) REAGAN’S MASSIVE INVESTMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO WIN THE COLD WAR (BY BORROWING, MAY I ADD)… IS WHAT FINALLY HELPED HIM BRING UNEMPLOYMENT BELOW THE 10.8% (ALL TIME HIGH) THAT THE NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE REACHED DURING HIS PRESIDENCY. THE ONLY PROBLEM WITH REAGAN WAS THAT HE NEVER TURNED OFF THE “BORROWING SPICKET” AFTER THE ECONOMY RECOVERED PUTTING THE NATION DEEPER AND DEEPER IN DEBT (MORE THAN ANY PRESIDENT SINCE ROOSEVELT).
(3) BUSH’S MASSIVE BORROWING TO FUND THE IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN WARS, WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY REDUCING THE TAX RATES FOR THE UPPER 10% INCOME EARNERS… (NATIONAL DEBT TO CHINA WENT FROM $65 BILLION UNDER CLINTON TO $740 BILLION UNDER BUSH)… ARE WHAT DOUBLED THE NATIONAL DEBT UNDER HIS WATCH FROM $5 TRILLION TO $10 TRILLION.
(4) SMARTES COMMENT OF ALL THREE: “I listen to the republicans opinions on the economy the same way I listen to my 10 yr. old” ……………. EXACTLY!!!!

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | December 27, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

The socialist tendencies of Obama and the Democrats are going to seriously wreck the American economy. The 2010 elections, when the Democrats lose their majority, will put the country back on a path to sanity.

Posted by: Greg | December 27, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Paul Krugman is a strong believer that if the Fed prints a lot money to rescue the troubled banks and run huge stimulus plan, then depression can be avoided. Using the words of Harvard history professor Ferguson, Krugman is a deficit loving economist . I would call Krugman a deficit loving bad boy, who has no knowledge of how to spend the stimulus money effectively to stop the rising unemployment.

Posted by: austin | December 27, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Krugman has been wrong on everything he suggests to Obama. He has zero credibility. The reason that the economy is a disaster is the deficit spending which Krugman continues to recommend including more deficits with a second porkulus package. AS long as Obama does anything Krugman recommends that economy will continue to fail.

Posted by: brian | December 27, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

We help build the Chinese economy because if we did not the Chinese would have started WWIII a little ways back. At one time the Chinese were starving of hunger and don’t mean a couple thousand Chinese I mean millions of Chinese. Nixon was the one to start this movement with the help of Kissenger. Agian if these guys didn’t make the first move most likely we might not be here today because Chinese would have invaded the Russia and the rest of Asia. That is one of the reasons why we have very little manufacturing in US.

Posted by: cony647 | December 27, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

BTW, the Democrats had a simple majority and came to power in 2007. Nothing they did could have been done without help from a Republican President. They also lacked the votes to stop the constant filibusters of the Republican.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | December 27, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Excuses, excuses. Dems have held Congress for 3 years, and the Presidency for 1 year. Yet we continue to have problems. Why would anyone expect a bunch of “lawyers” to know how to create jobs? We’re going into the 3rd year of a recession. How long is it going to take for the Dems to create jobs? Unemployment has gone from 4.9% to over 10% since they took Congress. I read somewhere that the increase in minimum wage destroyed at least 300,000 jobs. Now they’re trying to destroy the health insurance industry. How many jobs will that destroy?

Posted by: BK-70 | December 27, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Ummm..for the one who posted that the stock market rising was a sure sign we are out of it, you are wrong. The Fed is printing money like it’s going out of style, that drives down the value of the dollar. When the value of the dollar goes down, prices go up and that’s the only reason why stocks are rising because it takes more inflationary dollars to buy the stocks now than it did before the bailouts and the stimulus and all the other crap they are spending our money on, not because the companies are more valuable now than they were then. Eventually, interest rates have got to go back up and when they do the dollar will strengthen and stock prices will collapse. They are reinflating the bubbles so they can burst them again later.

Posted by: Joe | December 28, 2009, 3:12 am 3:12 am

All of those bickering back and forth about which political party bears the blame, or which President of which party bears the blame, must wear blinders.
Obama is essentially following the same path as Bush did economically. Spend, spend, spend. Nor was Bush the first, that is what Congress and all administrations have done for quite a while.
In the end, President Obama was elected to resolve the issue. Like the plumber that is hired to fix a plumbing job that another plumber failed at, there is no justification to continue to blame Bush for Obama’s failure to fix it.

Posted by: wmy | December 28, 2009, 3:54 am 3:54 am

Our economy will have a chance at avoiding a nosedive when President Obama stops running around telling everyone how and when he wants to raise taxes.
He really should know better than that – its rule #1 in a recession not to raise taxes. So all he does is talk about it – same thing! He’s got everyone spooked and for good reason – at the rate he is spending there is no way he will be able to avoid raising taxes on everyone. Talk about one big re-recession when he does that!
I’m afraid we are into this mess for the long haul until Obama changes his gloomy tune, stops spending money, or is voted out to get a better Democrat in office.

Posted by: JonF | December 28, 2009, 4:05 am 4:05 am

What Americans needs are jobs? 2 out 5 California is unemployed.
What is needed is an immediate curtailment of the foreign gues tworker programs (H1-B, L1, EAD, EB1, EB2 and EB3 visas) and a cancellation of many of these visas. We have millions of Americans pounding the pavement right now, and many of them are highly skilled people who could walk right into the jobs currently held by foreign guest workers. Business analyst, programmer, accountant, hotel clerk, you name it. Yet, American continues to import foreign guest workers! Most of these folks are nothing special: ordinary workers with common skill sets that Americans already have in abundance. Yet, they are working, we are not. They are being recruited, we are getting pink slipped. That’s just crazy. In many cases, they come in via international body shops who have a preferred vendor relationship with companies. Instead of posting jobs and interviewing American candidates, many company HR folks just pick up the phone and call the body shop. In most cases, the openings being filled are never advertised where American candidates can apply. This is discrimination against Americans.

Posted by: debug | December 28, 2009, 5:47 am 5:47 am

The problem is that no one will resume business expansion and start hiring again if they think they are going to get gutted by taxes at any moment. It’s defensive posturing – and totally understandable given the constant threats by our commander in chief. What baffles me is how in the world Obama could possibly think people will hire when they have this big cloud looming over them?
The big problem with Obama and the rest of them is that they are more concerned with how they will be seen by history than they are concerned with with the welfare of us everyday slobs. We got talked in to electing a man who pretends to care, but acts quite the opposite – on other issues as well.
We need people in Washington who care about the welfare of the American people NOW! – and who don’t give a damn how history will portray them.

Posted by: JonF | December 28, 2009, 6:00 am 6:00 am

Eliminating guest workers and visas is exactly the wrong thing to do. Workers from other parts of the world, particularly in tech sector create jobs. Companies move overseas when they can’t find workers with the skills here. Secondly, this “slump” is just the new reality. We Americans (consumers and govt) have been spending way beyond our means for decades, and we’re broke. There are no more personal saving accounts for home builders, consumer product advertisers, and automotive companies to strip mine anymore. There is no such thing as a sustainable deficit.

Posted by: Eric | December 28, 2009, 7:33 am 7:33 am

“Can’t find Tech workers here?”. Give me a break, since the tech bubble broke, I’ve had plenty of American Engineers leave the business because of the lack of work and outsourcing. Its not the lack of skills corporate American is complaining about, its what they have to pay for an American Engineer. H1B Visa guys are endentured servants, hoping for a chance at a green card.

Posted by: redbat | December 28, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am

At this point it doesn’t matter which party did what. What matters is that the issues get fixed.
Record foreclosures and a sharp rise in Bankruptcies are being caused by lack of jobs, not by lack of tax cuts. Our government has made a business out of exporting American industry over the last 25 years. We were told that high paying service jobs would replace manufacturing jobs. Those forecasts obviously never took the internet into account. Today both China and India benefit from old American cold war trade policies, while American workers are forced to move into tent cities. I will also suggest that our current GDP calculations are actually measuring China’s exports, not domestic activity.
In any event, how can America claw it’s way into positive GDP territory when 17.5% of it’s workforce is unemployed or underemployed? When both residential and commercial property is still in full retreat (despite reports to the contrary)? When government is ignoring the ’cause’ and dealing with the ‘effect’?
Pollyanna reporting is not the answer. We need politicians who are smart enough to address the underlying issues…. Which of course means we’re now in real trouble…

Posted by: Florida_realist | December 28, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Cheap foreign labor has taken millions of jobs from Americans right here in our own front yard. My company alone employed 30% H1B and other visa holding engineers. They were paying PhD’s from other countries what I was earning and I was not a degree holder. Now I’m unemployed, but I have worked for some of the very best BIG name companies on multi million dollar equipment for more than two decades.

Posted by: Ruler4You | December 28, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

To XRepublican Because of Bush–
Check your history facts WWII not FDR ended the Depression. FDR prolonged it. Where do you get your information?
Additionally the economy was good and unemployment was under 5% until Democrats took control in 2007. Please get a few facts correct!
For 35 years Democrats have promised each election to better the lives of Americans and Blacks, yet when in office they do nothing but line their pockets. Yet lemmings like you continue to hope.
You also might want to check which party has made all negative changes to Social Security.

Posted by: Bill | December 28, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

redbat | Dec 28, 2009 8:22:28 AM…..H1 visas and legal immigration have averaged over 1M since 1965; however, prior to that the average was 250,000. If that 250K was re-instilled and illegal aliens were removed, how many unemployed Americans would go back to work?

Posted by: deanbob | December 28, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

With TARP, the stimulus, increased annual spending, why would the economy slump? Is is the ghost of Bush? Can we take responsibility for our own actions?

Posted by: deanbob | December 28, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Turbo Timmy begs to differ Paul!

Posted by: LongT | December 28, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

H1-B visas?
Wake up people, there was a shortage of Low Cost High Margin Engineers in America.
Something had to be done.
Thank God we got rid of those pesky borders.

Posted by: Mike | December 28, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Oh Bill, you gave yourself away: “Democrats and Blacks.” It all comes down to race with you people, doesn’t it? Keep it up. We’ll keep winning elections and the Rethugs will be just people like you.

Posted by: RickJones | December 28, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Crookman knows not how to compute or he’d notice that there’s nothing worse than being bankrupt. The US is, so how can anything get any worse? Or is it only that by the second half of next year even he notices and that’s bad news?
A laureate with a penchant for puzzlement.

Posted by: GraueEminenz | December 28, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Krugman really wants to have it both ways. He was the main proponent of Keynsian policy through the aegis of the stimulus package. Repubicans argued that there has never been an instance where Keynsian economics has been shown to work. Krugman got his wish and in fact he argued that it was not large enough. Well Paul they just passed the second stimulus package and suddenly your talking about a downturn in the second half, a bald faced admision that you are clueless as an economist. If your child is in Princeton yank him out of Krugman’s class. Not only will he learn bad economics but Paul will use his lectures to turn your child into a socialist. PS Paul the economy is a lot more resilient than you think. It will slow in the second half but growth will be positive.

Posted by: James Bucholtz | December 28, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

There is one way we can get the economy going again: MASSIVELY overhaul our national taxation system to _encourage_ personal savings and capital investment staying in the USA. As it currently stands, our national taxation system costs around US$500 BILLION per year in compliance costs, causes American citizens and businesses to take around US$15 TRILLION in liquid assets out of the US financial system for tax avoidance purposes, and causes American businesses to “outsource” jobs by the millions for income tax avoidance purposes also. This is sheer economic stupidity, to say the least.
Maybe it’s time to seriously consider adopting Steve Forbes’ flat tax plan or the even more radical “FairTax” consumption tax plan to replace our current income tax system as a means to revive the US economy.

Posted by: RaymondC | December 28, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Anyone who has any contact with the real world at all knows that the REAL unemployment numbers are far more than 10%, probably closer to 25%. The fact that our Government can openly lie to us and falsify figures without any repercussions is incredible. Our Country has become a collection of clueless people who won’t demand truthfulness from the authorities. The stock market keeps going up because of the stimulus money given to the Banks but the average middle class person has no extra money and is either jobless or in fear of losing their home or job. The Government issues a continual stream of complete lies about every major issue that is covered and verified by the Media and no one seems to know, care or demand action by Congress to investigate. We demand that a billionaire pro=golfer answer for aldultery but a politician can openly steal, lie and not complete ANY of the promises he was elected on. A small group of super wealthy individuals are gaining more and more control over our lives and finances and only a handful of people are aware of it. Ignorance has become the badge of the American people and greed and power have become the uniform that our Government wears. Truly, the majority of Americans are clueless, ignorant, in it for themselves only and greedy beyond human comprehension. God is being removed from all public places with the nodding approval of most people even as the Country disintegrates in proportion to the lack of God in our lives. Such a sad state of affairs, such a sad Government, such a silly population of people drowning in their own ignorance.

Posted by: Johnny El | December 28, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Obama has shown an appalling lack of common sense on a host of issues,not just economics…It is hard to believe the economy will grow significantly with the kind of tax and regulatory philosophy he embraces despite some relatively good Christmas season spending by consumers.

Posted by: robert m. simon | December 28, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Just start another war of aggression somewhere! And increase the military spendings by 50%! … And keep grazing!

Posted by: Rafael_49 | December 28, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

A slump, is that what this is? I wonder what they will call the hyper-inflation that is going to come behind the drunken spending of a liberal Congress backed up by a wanna-be President will delusions of godhood?

Posted by: WhatChange? | December 29, 2009, 7:50 am 7:50 am

It never ends, does it. The Rabid Right foaming at the mouth and attacking everything in sight.
Hey, right-wingers. Pick up a history book and read about the conservative cabal controlling this country the last 28 years. Once again the right has run this country over a cliff, just like they did in the 1890s, 1920s and 1981-2008. Conservative fiscal policies fail every flipping time. A failed philosophy should be abandoned instead of insanely repeated. It will take a generation just to clean up the Reagan mess and another to get over the nightmare of Bush 43.

Posted by: The Hamster | December 29, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Try getting an education in California, especially one that might prove useful like engineering or nursing. The universities cannot guarantee the classes, what does that mean? It means you pay rent while trying to find a make do job, when the classes aren’t available for a semester. The engineers from the H1B crowd are OK, but as soon as there is enough technical information and business contacts, these are the first to leave to their home country and set up a competitive business. As far as companies going overseas to set up facilities because that’s where the labor is you are somewhat correct. Too many young people would rather hang out in the malls looking like gangsters with tatoos and baggy pants than learn a useful trade other than drug dealing and stealing car parts, or if not that sleeping till noon and playing video games all day. Slavery would not have disappeared in this country without the agony of the civil war, lazy poverty will not disappear without some agony to those folks. Those that will be left in 10 years hopefully will have learned and will be able to recreate the country that was supposed to be.

Posted by: CEOforLife | December 30, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

What about the high price of oil? When it hits $85 look for another serious contraction. Oil is running out folks. The idiots who think there is plenty are only dooming themselves to economic starvation. This country has 2% of the world’s reserves. During WW2 it had plenty to support the war effort, the same with the Soviets in Baku. That is why they won… We simply cannot support our military on the oil we have left. The economy needs to figure this out and sell the Suburbans and other energy consuming toys and find a product that might just delay a complete disaster…

Posted by: DOOMER | December 30, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Put a 30% tariff on ALL Chinese-made goods. The Chinese are not playing by the rules and are devaluing their currency for their economic advantage. The tariffs would stop the bleeding of manufacturing jobs to China and level the playing field for U.S. manufacturers.
The tariffs would be gradually reduced as the Chinese start floating their currency and improve their working conditions to that of the developed economies.

Posted by: Henry | January 1, 2010, 4:08 am 4:08 am

Yep, I agree with this. You should also put most important key phrases in the Heading ( etc.) tags from what I’ve read.

Posted by: bunk beds | September 18, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

well it is true that title tag is one of the most important tag which can make a great difference, i generally love to add title tag
with kewyords but somewhat different from the competitors websites

Posted by: bunk beds | September 18, 2010, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.