Dec 23, 2009 9:24am

Lyndon Baines Reid: A Moment of Triumph, but How Long Will It Last?

ABC News' Jonathan Karl reports: Say what you want about the health care bill, but Harry Reid is about to complete a task of LBJ proportions.  And Lyndon Johnson never had to corral 60 Senators for one vote during a blizzard.  If public opinion doesn’t turn around for Democrats, this may ultimately prove to be a pyrrhic victory, but on a purely procedural level Harry Reid now looks like the master of Senate.  One month ago, who seriously thought the health care bill would pass the Senate by Christmas? Just in case, President Obama will stick around for an extra day, delaying his departure to Hawaii, telling reporters, "I will not leave until my friends in the Senate have completed their work. The least I can do is to be around and to provide them any encouragement and last-minute help if necessary." But the most valuable Democratic player in all of this is 92-year-old Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., who wins just for showing up to vote.  And he’s been voting with vigor.  “When the clerk called his name, Byrd shouted ‘Aye!’ with his right index finger pointed in the air. He then pumped his left fist,” writes Paul Kane in the Washington Post. Democrats believe the public will warm to health care reform once Americans learn more about health care reform, but Republicans hope health care victory in 2010 will do to Democrats what health care defeat did to them in 1994. Republicans stayed united in opposition and tried everything possible to defeat or delay the bill, but now some conservatives are outraged that Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, in a Christmas gift for weary Senate staff and colleagues eager to get home for the holiday, agreed to schedule the vote for 8 a.m. tomorrow, yielding 11 hours of debate.  McConnell also agreed to schedule a vote tomorrow morning on raising the debt ceiling so the government can keep borrowing for another month or two.  To some, these are cowardly acts of appeasement. “We need a Churchill, not a molehill as the GOP leader,” declares Redstate.com.  “Good thing George Washington wasn’t a wimp when it came to crossing the Delaware in an ice storm on Christmas night.”
What now?  The issues to be worked out in conference look tough, but Democrats are confident they’ll be resolved.  Now it’s a question of when – not if — the bill will be passed.  The House returns on January 12, the Senate on the 19th.   That leaves almost no time to get the bill in time for the President’s signature before his state of the union address (which is likely to be either January 26 or February 2).  How about a Valentine’s Day deadline? If there’s one issue that could still derail this, it’s abortion. Bart Stupak has sounded off against the Senate abortion language, but look at what he did not say in an interview with AP: "He termed the language 'unacceptable’ but also said he's not yet ready to say he would oppose a final bill over that issue alone.” Good luck with this:  “Companies are alarmed at potentially costly provisions in the Senate health-care bill, many of which they hope will be scrapped during a final round of negotiations early next year,” writes Neil King, Jr. in the Wall Street Journal.  "We're still committed to the notion that health reform can be done right, but I know of no company that is warmly embracing what is in either the House or Senate bills," said Paul Dennett, top health-care adviser to the American Benefits Council, an advocacy group for large employers. Washington Times Page One:  “Health bill faces constitutional challenge” – Some Republicans are hoping Chief Justice John Roberts will come to the rescue on one of two grounds:  challenging the constitutionality of the mandate that all Americans buy health insurance and the special treatment for Nebraska few other states. That second challenge comes from South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMasters, who just happens to be running for governor:  "I have instructed my attorneys to begin looking into the constitutionality of this provision and exploring the options that may be available to South Carolina and other states to defend taxpayers should this provision ultimately become law," Mr. McMaster, a Republican, said in a statement, arguing that federal laws should treat all states the same. On those grounds, Mr. McMaster may find himself challenging almost everything Congress passes. Speaking of deadlines: When exactly is the Guantanamo Bay prison going to close?  As much as Dick Durbin would love to welcome Al Qaeda’s nastiest to the Thomson Correctional Center in Illinois, Congress hasn’t gotten around to funding the gitmo transfer.  “As a result,” Charles Savage writes in the New York Times, “officials now believe that they are unlikely to close the prison at Guant‡namo Bay, Cuba, and transfer its population of terrorism suspects until 2011 at the earliest — a far slower timeline for achieving one of President Obama’s signature national security policies than they had previously hinted.” And even 2011 may be an ambitious timeline.  The White House had floated the idea of including the $150 million to buy the prison in the just-passed Defense appropriations bill, but that was a no-go with Congress.  It’s also unlikely to find its way into the supplemental Afghanistan war funding bill this spring (that one will be complicated enough as is, thank you very much).   Savage reports the White House may have to wait until next fall – and next year’s Defense appropriations bill – to get the money.  And after Congress agrees to buy the prison, he says it will take about 10 months to get it ready. Ben LaBolt, a White House spokesman, said Mr. Obama remained committed to closing the Guant‡namo prison, adding, “We will continue to work with Congress to ensure that we secure the necessary funds to purchase and upgrade the Thomson prison, which will operate at a substantially lower cost to taxpayers, next year.” Politico’s Alex Isenstadt and Josh Kraushaar have some great details on Alabama Rep. Parker Griffith’s defection from the Democratic party (he blind-sided Democrats with the move, even attending Speaker Pelosi’s holiday party):  “Privately Democrats acknowledged the announcement came as a serious blow to a party that, over the last several election cycles, had made significant inroads in conservative southern districts like Griffith’s, which delivered 61 percent of the vote to John McCain in 2008 but nevertheless managed to elect a Democrat to an open House seat.” BUT:  CQ’s John McCardle reports that Alabama Republicans are not clearing the field for Griffith.  “Madison County Commissioner Mo Brooks (R) said Tuesday afternoon that he won't be clearing out of the GOP primary in Alabama's 5th district to make way for Rep. Parker Griffith, who announced earlier in the day that he was switching parties and joining the Republican Conference. Brooks also warned the Congressman that his party switching ways will not go over well with GOP primary voters, who make up the vast majority of the 48 percent of the 5th district electorate that voted against Griffith in the 2008 general election..” Politico's Jonathan Martin and Ben Smith write that we won’t have Rudy Giuliani to kick around anymore in 2010.  "For such an outsized figure, Giuliani exited Tuesday in a modest and underwhelming fashion. He spoke at a moderately-attended press conference in a hotel basement and offered only the most practical reasons for turning down clear shots at the Senate and the governorship—elections that would have propelled him back to the national stage in 2012 or 2016." This is fascinating:  Today the Times of London has alleged details on the bin Laden family members — one of Osama’s wives, six of his children and 11 of his grandchildren — reportedly being kept in a high-security compound outside Tehran.

The Kicker “I'm prepared to fight for the state of Nebraska, but I am not prepared to fight to get a special deal for the state of Nebraska.” - Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb. The Note morning analysis won’t publish again until Monday, Jan. 4, but check out The Note blog for breaking news updates as always.

User Comments

A good day….Healthcare bill in the Senate is on its way to passing.
We have 2 parties in congress now. History looking back to these days will identify one party as working towards a healthcare bill and another party working against it.
Merry Xmas !

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

“Democrats believe the public will warm to health care reform once Americans learn more about health care reform,”
Exactly. The media has done it’s usual lousy job of explaining the bill, allowing the rightwing noise machine to frighten the populace. Every night on my local TV, the anti-reform people run ads full of misleading statements. And the local news reporters do nothing to refute these claims, I think because their salaries are paid by these special interest groups. The fundamental problem with our country today, is just this kind of disconnect from truth and reality. The media acts as if there is no such thing as “simple facts.” Everything is reported from a partisan point of view.

Posted by: Amy in Maine | December 23, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

The difference now is that most Americans agree that health care must be fixed, they are just skeptical of this specific bill. That can be changed.

Posted by: Matt | December 23, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Everybody is “skeptical” of change. That’s the Process of Change. LBJ, thank you for standing for Medicare. Reid, thank you for standing for Healthcare Reform in a quiet, but Strong presence. Thank you Dems!

Posted by: sara | December 23, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

“Democrats believe the public will warm to health care reform once Americans learn more about health care reform,”
Yeah like all the TV networks blasting propaganda for 6 months didn’t give people a chance to learn about it.
The real problem is this attitude of “these lowly people don’t know what’s good for them”.

Posted by: Turtle Noneck | December 23, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

If Reid gets blamed for every problem that comes with this bill, he will go down in shame.

Posted by: Jeff | December 23, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Amy in Maine — And still, the majority of Americans are against this bill! Amazing isn’t it?

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Sen. Reid was reduced to offering bribes, kickbacks and a myriad of other sleazy arrangements to squeak this atrocious bill through. In the process, he’s destroyed his career and reutation, as well as those of dozens of his fellow Democrats. Given the public mood, I would not want to be seen as the party of government. The rage felt towards elected officials at all levels of goverment today by conservatives, moderates and independents is palpable. See you in November, Democrats. You’re finished.

Posted by: Ken | December 23, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

What a day..seeing GOPers rant against backroom deals … something that has always been key in their playbook. Is that today’s talking point rant?
Yesterday’s wingnut talking point rant was ‘Transparency’

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Ken — I feel the same way, but it would appear the Dems don’t even have a clue as to how they look in pushing this on us! We’ll see in 2010 and 2012.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Well, there is some good news. The ins and PhRMA stocks have surged to new highs these past two weeks. I especially thank the Dems for killing the Dorgan amendment which would have allowed for the importation of drugs. Thanks to Menendez D-NJ and the WH for their efforts in killing Dorgan’s bill. Yes, indeed, thank you for making my Christmas and stocks much brighter. Wall St knew immediately this farce was going to tank. Let’s see what everyone else got for Christmas:
-15 million on Medicaid. They did not include a doctor who will actually see you.
-9 million of those choosing not to be insured now will be fined…maybe.
-Docs lost the Doc Fix and will now lose 21% in compensation. Just what you Medicaid folks need since there are not enough docs to go around now.
Merry Christmas. Harry.

Posted by: salty | December 23, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

New Wave — You fail to realize 2 things. 1, not all of us are wingnuts. 2, I evaluate Obama on what he says he will do and one of them was transparency. The other was “no more business as usual” in DC. Just taking these 2 issues into account (because there are plenty more), do you honestly believe he has fulfilled his promise especially on the health care issue? Really? Tell the truth!

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

New Wave — Maybe you do not understand the concept of responsibility as many of us do. And before you rant about Bush, I didn’t vote for him and couldn’t care less. I am concerned with a President that has been in office almost 1 year now.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

yawn..zzzzz

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

These liberal socialists in Washington are not going to be able to enjoy their “victory” in the healthcare debate for very long.
The majority of Amerircans oppose what they are doing, but somehow they are celebrating the potential passing of this monstrosity? 2010 and 2012 cannot come soon enough!

Posted by: Palin4prez | December 23, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Here is a gem found on Page 1,020 — “It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection.”
Clearly Prince Harry will stoop to record depths to expand the federal government’s powers. Looks like the coup is underway by Queen Nancy and Prince Harry.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | December 23, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

“”"”yawn..zzzzz”"”"
Posted by: New Wave
Just as I thought. Obama admirers can’t ever admit he has done anything wrong at all. As a matter of fact, his first 12 months in office will be hailed as the greatest first 12 months by any President. Not only do I beg to differ, but the polls are a painful reminder to the contrary.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Conservatives only look for immediate wins and results. The health bill is mitigating an inevitable health care crisis in the future where only the wealthy will be able to afford insurance. In the next 10 years, this bill will reduce the deficit by $132B and and still provide insurance to the less fortunate. And we are not saddling our children with debt of a medical crisis. But that’s the future. Conservatives don’t care about the future, only the here and now and their own pockets.

Posted by: DaveM | December 23, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

DaveM
“Conservatives only look for immediate wins and results”?
What does that even mean? You think this bill being shoved down our throats right now is sustainable? Look all over the world where gov’t has gotten its hands on healthcare and you will see country after country in debt up to their eyes, poor quality of care for the citizens there, and rationing of services.
Sorry, but I don’t want the government deciding who lives and who dies, based on an individuals “perceived” benefit to society. Giving government that much power has resulted in some of the greatest mass murders in human history, but you people are ready to put your socialist/communist gear and follow obama off of a cliff.
If obama was even remotely a good leader he could have brought both sides together and reached an agreement that would have been suitable for most Americans. Have you seen the polls lately? The exact opposite has happened.

Posted by: Dave | December 23, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Bribes was the only way this got anywhere. The dems are a bunch of liars and keep the poor down people. Wake up America and see what the dems have done and will do to your FREEDOM!!!

Posted by: Jim Rod | December 23, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

DaveM. Well, have to disagree with you on one point. Couple of days ago on the Senate floor a Dem Senator had tears in his eyes over folks not having money enough to buy drugs…breaking pills, etc., etc., It was a sad presentation.
Well, Mr. Dem, why did you guys defeat Dorgan and the opportunity for folks to cut their drug purchases by up to 75%? Why? Menendez D-NJ and the WH and PhRMA. You heard all that bs about health concerns. Yeah, right, the Chinese would not dare poison us (most drug material comes from China and India)…they own us and want their money back. All about the money regardless of the side.

Posted by: salty | December 23, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Congratulations are in order Mr. President. You have repeatedly told congress that passing any bill is better than passing nothing. Well now you are getting two fine examples of bills that spend alot of money and don’t help the problem that you were trying to correct.
Several things are driving up the cost of healthcare:
1)Doctors start their careers heavily in debt(estimates range from 280-340k to fully train a physican depending on specialty), therefore few try to become physicians and those that do are forced to charge a high price for so that they can pay their own bills, and so pass those costs to patients and third party payors, i.e. insurance companies and government programs.
Two problems here: Few phsyicans enter the service pool, and high cost of training mean a high cost for the service provided.
2)Government programs don’t negotiate rates with hospitals and doctors like other payors do, so those servicers are forced to pass a higher amount of their costs, per service, to those who pay out of pocket and those with private insurance.
The cost of the services are unevenly spread through the population utilizing the services.
3)Private insurance companies have to create insurance policies that follow both federal and state guidelines, where every state has a different set of guidelines for their policies, unless a company purchasing their service chooses to set themselves up as a self-insured plan with the insurance company just administrating benefits.
Wide range of regulating requirements from the different states prevent true competition in the markets, as some private insurers are willing to bear the burden of creating policies in one state where others would deem it not cost effective.
4)Drug companies are allowed to extend their patents on their drugs preventing quicker introduction of generic drugs into the market.
Profits overriding benefits to patients.
5)There needs to be serious tort reform.
***
The only thing that the house and senate touched upon is problem #2, and not even in either healthcare bill in the house or senate versions. Everything else was either not considered as an issue or, as in the case of tort reform, was considered to abrasive to the Lawyer lobby(see Harry Reids comments on the subject earlier this year).
But the democrats got their bill.

Posted by: bobtherepublican | December 23, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

“Democrats believe the public will warm to health care reform once Americans learn more about health care reform,”
I will never “warm” to the fact that you are BRIBING other members to get this bill passed.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 23, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

bobtherepublican
It’s a shame more Republicans didn’t join Olympia Snowe in working on this bill. Snowe is the genuine article, an old fashioned Republican, but she was vilified for trying to shape this bill.
How different this bill could have been if Republicans had actually worked to fix healthcare in this country instead of trying to make healtcare reform Obama’s Waterloo.
But, we’ve got a bill, at least it’s a step forward, in my opinion.

Posted by: Amy in Maine | December 23, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Lyndon B Johnson vs Harry Reid = statesman vs corruptocrat =
popular in Texas vs unpopular in Nevada

Posted by: austin | December 23, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Amy in Maine; While you grump about the way the press reports the news keep in mind that 53% of all Americans oppose health care reform in any way and 64% oppose the provisions of the senate and house bills. So what’s so wrong about the prediction that the people will warm to the idea once they experience it? That’s optimism if there ever was such a thing.
It remains to be seen what we’ll end up with after the committee of Democrats have added their back room finishing touches. Some sweet deals have been passed out in the senate version. Earmark spending at it’s most defineable. Your/our president promised no signature on legislations containing earmarks. Will he cave?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 23, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

People here are mouthing off ‘backroom’ deals and comparing with LBJ.
Does anyone know the details of how LBJ got people to vote for his bills? No we do not because the level of information available now was not available then. Do not compare oranges and apples.
People may consider comparing what is being done now to how the GOP passed the unpaid $900 BILLION medicare bill a few years ago.

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Teabag party people are known to be against the healthcare bill.
When will Michelle Bachman return the $250,000 her family received from the Federal Government for their farm? She’s a leading tea party person who is against using Federal funds to assist anyone right?
This reminds me of wingnuts using a government-run transit system to attend an anti-government protest. There a few of them had health issues and were assisted with government-run EMS services.

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Amy in Maine; It’s ashame the Dems didn’t join the Republicans for bipartisan support. You like to talk about how opposed to every issue the Republicans were throughout this peocess. Had Reid and Pelosi merged by allowing interstate competition, importation of drugs and tort reform the people could truly claim a victory.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 23, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

mmonroeliveson
I have followed the healtcare reform coverage for months now, and the only remotely fact based reporting I have seen has been from NPR.
I’m not kidding, our local TV has been inundated with anti-reform ads, totally not fact=based. Under those circumstances, is it any wonder people are scared to death of reform? Just now, I was over on CNN, and Dr.Gupta is asking people if they will give up their diets and exercise regimes if they get health insurance! This kind of nonesense has dominated the reform coverage.

Posted by: Amy in Maine | December 23, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Hmmm Dr. Gupta; Isn’t that the guy Obama wanted for Surgeon General but Dr. Gupta didn’t want to be his yes man?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 23, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

ask teresa heinz kerry what she thinks of her husbands new bill.

Posted by: catman | December 23, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Amy in Maine — What would you expect considering the “zero transparency” we have received on this issue? As I said before, if this is good for the American people, why do we have all the backroom deals going on? Why isn’t the public showing an overwhelming support?

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Dr. Gupta is on my you-know-what list.
He’s clearly a closet Republican hack.
And the comments section of his blog is filled with people asking what reform will mean for their coverage. It’s as if the media doesn’t understand this issue affects real people.

Posted by: Amy in Maine | December 23, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

To Amy in Maine:
Oh without question there are problems with how the bills were forms.
Republicans would have been done much better to join with some democrats and create a full fledged bill of their own that would show they wanted to join into the process. The “waterloo” comment and the more recent “middle-finger” nonsense from Steele recently isn’t helpful. It would have shown the American public that they were going to take a genuine stab at trying to reform healthcare in the country.
However the Democrats share in the blame also for the present circumstances. It would have been much better for the Democrat leadership to work more hand-in-hand with Republicans, rather than lambast them for even suggesting that they should have a voice in the proceedings, then when several hundred page bills were dropped onto the floor of the House and Senate act offended when Republicans start to question whats in the bills. The scapegoating of republicans got to be ridiculous after a while also. To quote Rep Alan Grayson from FL “The Republican health care plan is this: ‘Don’t get sick, and if you do get sick, die quickly.’”. Such a thing is unhelpful at best, devisive and antagonistic at worst, and it ends up not being helpful to the American people at all(likewise for Joe Wilson’s “You lie!”)
The President himself also carries a significant amount of blame, I would say most of the blame, because as the president he should work as a bridge between the parties and arguments to force them to see common ground(see the Clinton and Reagan years). His policy for most of the year is to ask congress to fix healthcare, then leave DC and start campaigning around the country for the general idea of reform, or to go overseas and talk about unrelated subjects. Being a leader isn’t only about public speaking, and he has failed the American people by not being a more engaged member of the process. I don’t know what to say about his comments that Republicans are the ones that are obstructing the process when there is a super majority of Dem’s in the House and in the Senate.
They are all at fault, Amy, all of them. It would be most helpful to the process if they all remember that the American people sent them there to guide the country in the best intrest of all of its citzens, and not so that they can make deals to get reelected.

Posted by: bobtherepublican | December 23, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

“We have 2 parties in congress now. History looking back to these days will identify one party as working towards a healthcare bill and another party working against it.”
Must be a fantastic bill.
The President, his wife, Congressmen, their families, and their staffs are all EXEMPT from the bill’s mandates. The mind-numbed progressive sheep, who don’t have a clue what’s in the bill, are not.
Hope and Change!

Posted by: Mary | December 23, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

“Democrats believe the public will warm to health care reform once Americans learn more about health care reform”
Then why have they been so secretive about the various proposals as they were being considered?
They bought off Big Pharma.
They bought off the AMA.
They bought off key Senators.
But they havent been able to buy off the American people.

Posted by: Joe White | December 23, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Enough of this false outrage over Harry Reid’s “bribing” Senators.
How did Republicans pass the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act?
First, the Bush appointed head of Medicare/etc, Thomas A. Scully, threatened to fire an actuary who said the plan would cost $139 billion more than Bush said it would. (the actuary was wrong too, the plan is going to cost at least $700 billion more, or double what Bush said it would cost over the first 10 years). So right off the bat they lied about the cost to make it more palatable to the deficit hawk members of their side.
Then, Tom Delay bribed several Republican members during the actual vote, who then switched their votes to get the bill passed (it failed twice, before the Reps resorted to bribery and refused to declare the vote over for several hours until they got enough members to switch their original votes).
The bill also sided with drug companies, blocked Medicare from negotiating lower prices and banned Americans from importing low-cost drugs (sound familiar?). It also contained a gigantic “donut hole” that confuses the hell out of seniors and also costs them thousands more.

Posted by: gary | December 23, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

“”"”Dr. Gupta is on my you-know-what list. He’s clearly a closet Republican hack.”"”"
Posted by: Amy in Maine
Why, because he shunned Obama and doesn’t agree with you?

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

The more the right rants against this bill, the more I feel this bill is right.

Posted by: GB | December 23, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

lfrichar | Dec 23, 2009 1:04:58 PM
….You took the words right off of my keyboard!

Posted by: deanbob | December 23, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

ABC “Say what you want about the health care bill, but Harry Reid is about to complete a task of LBJ proportions.” And yet no mention of the almost $74 BILLION unfunded libility. How about the GAO discovery of double counting and the revised estimate of $100 billion deficit? Fair and balanced reporting?

Posted by: deanbob | December 23, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

We should demand an answer why they are not part of the bill they are forcing on us. And we should keep asking and asking and asking – until they give us an answer.

Posted by: deanbob | December 23, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Your/our president promised no signature on legislations containing earmarks. Will he cave? Posted by: mmonroeliveson | Dec 23, 2009 12:23:08 PM**********No, he will just lie again and say there are no earmarks in this bill. Just like he did with stimulus money.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 23, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

How different this bill could have been if Republicans had actually worked to fix healthcare in this country instead of trying to make healtcare reform Obama’s Waterloo. Posted by: Amy in Maine | Dec 23, 2009 11:59:41 AM**********
Amy, If you are truly watching the news, you would know by now that the Republicans have been BLOCKED OUT of ANY reform proposals. They weren’t even allowed to see it.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 23, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

“The more the right rants against this bill, the more I feel this bill is right.”
Many on the right also ranted about the dangers of subprime lending and Fannie/Freddie backing bad loans. Now it looks like taxpayers are on the hook for $800 BILLION in losses for just Fannie/Freddie alone. You and your fellow progressives will help pay for it. Enjoy!

Posted by: Mary | December 23, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Thank you, Mr. President for accomplishing this momunentous task. The republicans did everything they could to damage the bill, and they did some serious damage but in the end, they have failed to stop it. Health care will soon be a Citizen’s right, not the profit-based industry that it is today. Once again, thank you.

Posted by: Toby | December 23, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

My medical deductible tripled for 2010. Thanks Dems. There is no coincidence that this happened along with the push for “healthcare reform.” I’ve seen 2 different advisors on CNBC also say the Dow will go through the floor next year when the Fed raises rates. Thanks for the “change.” Unfortunately, it’s bad.

Posted by: BK-70 | December 23, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

The Right do not care about what is good or bad for Americans right now. Their main objective is to be against whatever the President tries to do regardless of its merits.
That’s why in the space of 12 hours two weeks ago the GOP Senate leader had conflicting medicare position on his webpage. The screenshots of the web pages where laughable.
In October, a GOP House member who voted against the H1N1 vaccine funding was found to be in a queue (along with his daughter) for the same vaccine 3 days later in Virginia.

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

HealthBill Exposed: The train has left the station. No amount of misinformation or spin can stop it. Go back to your cave.

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

“”"”In October, a GOP House member who voted against the H1N1 vaccine funding was found to be in a queue (along with his daughter) for the same vaccine 3 days later in Virginia.”"”"
Posted by: New Wave
Did he pay for it? Funny thing, that vaccine won’t take effect until 5 weeks after you get it. We’re pretty much over the “scare” and we’ve wasted an aweful lot of money for nothing. More people die of the regular flu than H1N1. What a waste.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

lfrichar: The thrust of the 2 examples I listed (and there are a lot more) is that the GOP = Hypocrisy Party.
I commend the GOP for the ability of stating hypocritial positions with straight faces.

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

New Wave — Both parties are liars and hypocrites, you just won’t admit it. Would you like me to start a list of the things the Dems have violated this year? Bet my list is alot longer than yours! All need to go and yuo would keep the half that is screwing things up even worse.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

lfrichar: We need to deal with the reality that we have a 2-party system. I agree that one can find faults on both sides.
A possible solution is elimination of private campaign contributions in the United States. Every candidate for every elected office is given a fixed amount for that level. That way we’ll get people with real solutions in congress. Right now one’s capability is really one’s ability to raise money. With public funding, we’ll have people campaign on ideas and results. And Lobbyists would not have any sway.
But we have to deal with the reality that we have right now.

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

New Wave — Now we can agree on funding for sure. My thought would be the only campaign funds could come from private citizens with a maximum of $100 given through income tax forms. No big business or corporations. Also limit the amount of their own cash to support their campaign. But, reality is I am voting against many incumbents to try and force new politicians to work together. Next elections should be interesting.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

“The Right do not care about what is good or bad for Americans right now. Their main objective is to be against whatever the President tries to do regardless of its merits.”
The President, his wife, Congressmen, their families, and their staffs are all EXEMPT from the healthcare reform mandates.
Wake up, sheep!

Posted by: Mary | December 23, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Thanks for nothin to the GOP

Posted by: Bob | December 23, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

just when you thought it couldnt get any more ridiculous, abc is now lauding the ‘accomplishments’ of dingy harry?? omg.. any fool could bribe and threaten his way to getting 60 votes out of this group of lib senators (by definition all libs lack morals and beleive in the ‘end justifying the means’, they all have their price for compromising on principles), plus a willing media to cover for them. please, he’s a disgrace who better enjoy what lil time he has left as nevada senator he is GONE next year

Posted by: realman1963 | December 23, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Harry Reid comes across as some type of wierdo – pedifile – who speaks in wispers..very strange little man..how Nevada ever elected this weasel is surprising…

Posted by: Peter King | December 23, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Mary: That wingnut talking point of congress not wanting to participate in their healthcare bill plans has been proven to be false. Sen Vitter’s bluff of passing an amendment that ensures that congress members take part in the health care bill plans was called when some Dem Senators became co-sponsors.
War919: Are you mad that 2 people with diverging views on some issues can agree on an issue? People like you reap from dividing people.

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

One problem with this bill is it appears to continue allowing unregulated fortune building of corporate ‘providers’ of profit-for-illness, at the expense of the [once] middle class.
The conservaflunkies have no idea what that really means, they just yell against it, because the GOP dinosaurs tell them to.
Howard Dean brings up a good point. Just scrap the bill, and start over again.

Posted by: gus amaral | December 23, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Peter King: You forgot to mention that other NV Senator – John Ensign. Who had an affair with a staffer that is married to another staffer of his. John Ensign’s parents paid off the other family with $93,000 as ‘gifts’. Don’t worry that case will grow bigger as 2010 rolls on, in time for the elections.
Oh..how about the diaper-wearing (with prostitutes) GOP Sen Vitter of LA?

Posted by: New Wave | December 23, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Wow, New Wave actually said something I agree with. Each candidate gets only “X” dollars to work with, outlaw campaign contributions and lobbying and maybe, maybe Washington will begin to change back to “for the people”.

Posted by: War919 | December 23, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

“”"”"Americans will finally get real health care.”"”"”
Posted by: mmmoke
Considering Obama is about to break about 4 campaign promises when he signs this bill, Americans better get something out of it beside higher taxes.

Posted by: lfrichar | December 23, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

It appears that the real problem is government, career politicians have taken over and their first job priority is either getting elected or getting re-elected to office. Their next job priority which is far below the first is to pass legislation the people need. Ask yourself would you spend millions of dollars for a job which pays only slightly more than $200k per year and in the case of a member of the House of Representatives do it every two years? It is time to get rid of the career politician and get folks in office who are there to do the people’s business rather than line their own pockets. All present Congressmen and all running for Congress in the future should be asked to fully support proposed Constitutional amendment COE09E33. This is a simple easy to understand two page bill, Google COE09E33 to read it for yourself. This one simple bill would result in change that we the people could really believe in.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | December 23, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Chicago style Washington politics – change ? YES way more corruption- those so called poloticians should be shown the way that Nixon took. If any commoner did anything like whats been happening they would be proecuted!!!
What has government had control over that has not been AFU ?
TOTALLY DISGUSTED

Posted by: totally disgusted | December 24, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Why wont they let insurance companies sell across state lines? I thought they wanted competition?

Posted by: steve | December 24, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Completely unrelated: but what was the purpose of he First Couple to incite people on Christmas Day to help
the fighting troops by donating phone cards, care packages, etc, while they sit in front of a Christmas Tree, in Hawaii, resting from other travels. What ever happened to the Nobel Prize $s that we were told would be going to a charity.. Wouldn’t it be a show of
concern for these troops if he had made donations to
them, by providing THEM with treats and playing cards and games? Again, hot air….

Posted by: 2smart4u | December 25, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

@ Dave:
Look all over the industrialised world and you will see a wide variety of healthcare systems- some run by the government and some run by the private sector with government regulations.
The things that all these other countries have in common are that they provide universal healthcare- and they cost about half as much as the US system.
This healthcare bill is only the start of bringing the US system up to the standard of the rest of the world!

Posted by: Ray | December 27, 2009, 6:56 am 6:56 am

Wait until all those 20 and 30 somethings find out that they will have to buy insurance not at today’s rates but at the inflated rates that the insurance companies will be forced to charge to stay in business.
When insurance companies are required to cover all regardless of pre-existing conditions they will have to charge the young and healthy more to cover the increased costs.
When insurance companies cannot charge the elderly more than twice the amount they charge the young and healthy then rates for the young will have to be more to compensate.
When medicaid is forced to increase coverage then hospitals will see more medicaid patients. Medicaid does not compensate at the same levels as private insurance so hospitals pass the cost over to private insurance by charging 5 dollars for a bandaid and 50 for an aspirin. With more medicaid patients to compensate for the hospitals will be forced to charge even more to the private carriers to make up the shortfall. This will drive up premiums even more.
The increased medicaid coverage will also mean that states will have to raise taxes. Unless, of course, you live in Nebraska which got an illegal contribution from Harry Reid with your money. This is why 14 states AG’s have lined up to fight this illegal provision.
Your right…the liberal MSM has done a lousy job of explaining how bad this bill is.
The good news is that it is likely to cost the Dems the majority so the GOP can come in later and fix this mess.

Posted by: manapp99 | January 2, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.