Napolitano Changes Talking Points on “The System” Working
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has revised her talking points.
Yesterday, Napolitano downplayed the ability of Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalab’s ability to get on the Northwest Airlines flight with explosives – and despite his father’s warnings to the US Embassy in Nigeria about his son’s extremist religious views – focusing instead on accentuating the positive.
“Once the incident occurred, the system worked,” she told me on This Week on Sunday. “The passengers reacted correctly, the crew reacted correctly, within an hour to 90 minutes, all 128 flights in the air had been notified. And those flights already had taken mitigation measures on the off-chance that there was somebody else also flying with some sort of destructive intent.”
This morning she took to the airwaves with a slightly different message.
“Our system did not work in this instance,” Napolitano said on the TODAY show this morning. “No one is happy or satisfied with that. An extensive review is under way."
Ah.
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Did she explain why she has had a change of heart? It seems odd that she would go on all the Sunday shows and say one thing, only to retract the next day.
Posted by: Plumber | December 28, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
“Once the incident occurred, the system worked.”
Most of the time when the incident occurs it is too late. We got lucky this time because of some quick thinking passengers.
We must be vigilant and remember that we have to be right every time, the terrorists only have to right once!
Posted by: DJ | December 28, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
It is absolutely inexcusable that this man is not at this very moment being interrogated as an enemy combatant. Instead, he has lawyered up, and can stop talking whenever he wants. It seems clear that has information that, if obtained, could materially assist in preventing future attacks that have already been planned. Should such attacks occur, considerable blame will righly attach to those who made the recklessly stupid decision to treat this guy as an ordinary criminal.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | December 28, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
The system worked because said terrorist had a faulty detonator and didn’t blow a hole in the plane as it was landing. Nice. In other words, passengers you’re on your own.
Posted by: Q | December 28, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Hey Jake, it wasn’t a “slightly different message” today it was a completely different message.
Posted by: Q | December 28, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Why is this person net being interrogated by the CIA to gather as much fresh data on his contacts, travels, etc?
Many of you will read this as “why is he not being tortured” and that is not what I am saying. He is an enemy combatant and needs to be treated as such…not as a criminal who can hide behind our very own legal system.
Posted by: mark | December 28, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I’m a bleeding heart liberal and even I’ve had it, can we profile now? Has anyone a) female, b) over the age of 35 tried to blow up a plane? Why are we wasting time double scrutinizing everyone when the profile is so stunningly clear. Can we scrutinize who gets exit row seats if they get on the plane at all? Can we put in people that ask the right questions like El Al does in Israel? Until we do this will continue to happen.
Posted by: Lisa | December 28, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I sure don’t feel very safe under this administration. Why should innocent people pay the price for their ignorance?
Posted by: Jeff | December 28, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Has anyone a) female, b) over the age of 35 tried to blow up a plane?
__________________________________
It’s a pretty good point Lisa – however, female suicide bombers have been used overseas and it’s not safe to rule them out.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I sure don’t feel very safe under this administration
_____________________________________
Did you feel safer under the previous administration when they were commonly jacking up and announcing the code warnings to Orange or Red? Seemed to me they were trying to scare everybody.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Posted by: Lisa | Dec 28, 2009 3:17:08 PM
El Al is interested in saving lives, we in the U.S. are interested in political correctness.
Posted by: DJ | Dec 28, 2009 2:52:52 PM
“We” also got lucky due to a faulty detonator.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Fire Janet Incompetano!
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Underwear Bomber cannot be interrogated until he gets his skin grafts, paid by taxpayers of course.
Posted by: millie | December 28, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
This was the same explosive Tom Ridge saw used in the December 2001 attack by the infamous ‘shoe bomber’. Ridge had years to put safeguards in place to ensure this type of explosive couldn’t be carried onto planes – he obviously failed didn’t he?
___________________________________
The next step will have to be detection of this sort of explosive material.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Lied or wrong, Janet? Maybe tanked like Bacchus…Or dumb like Reid.
Posted by: 6 Pack | December 28, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Posted by: tierra | Dec 28, 2009 3:39:05 PM
Does OFA provide healthcare benefits?
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Does OFA provide healthcare benefits?
Gotta wait to 2014. Sorry.
Posted by: H. Reid | December 28, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Sounds like she told Jake “AFTER THE INCIDENT” and today that the SCREENING process did not work. But that would not make for a great blog post, so Jake just ignores that context. Nice. Ah.
Posted by: mk3872 | December 28, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Does OFA provide healthcare benefits?
__________________________________
I don’t know, but they probably hire people with more intelligence and more integrity than the other side.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Seemed to me they were trying to scare everybody.
_____________________________________
People should be scared when people are trying to blow up planes. Our nations security should be our first priority.
This is not Tom Ridges mistake. This happened during this administration.
You know, the administration that posted security screening procedures online.
Posted by: claire | December 28, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
It is ultimately up to us to protect ourselves when the time arises. The police, air marshals, etc. respond, but oftentimes it is too late.
Posted by: Huh | December 28, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Did you feel safer under the previous administration when they were commonly jacking up and announcing the code warnings to Orange or Red? Seemed to me they were trying to scare everybody.
Posted by: tierra | Dec 28, 2009 3:39:05 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yes, as a matter of fact I did feel more safe under the previous administration. I also had more money and better job security. Thanks for asking.
Posted by: jennifert7 | December 28, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Here’s how the SYSTEM isn’t working . . . There is NO head of the TSA bc Senator Dimwitt from SC is holding up the nomination because he’s afraid it will lead to unionization of the the screeners. As usual lazy uninformed reporters opt for the easy angle turning a problem into anti-Obama / anti- government rant . . and fools follow.
Here’s what I’d like to know, why doesn’t the airport in the Netherlands use it’s screening technology on Americans? (NYT) If it did, very likely – problem solved, system worked.
Posted by: Jeremy tschudin | December 28, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Well so far I have heard the HS Chief cal this act of terror “the incident” and “this instance.” That’s reassuring…
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 28, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
“There is NO head of the TSA bc Senator Dimwitt from SC is holding up the nomination because he’s afraid it will lead to unionization of the the screeners.”
There is no reason for TSA to be unionized (except from Obama’s perspective as he is owned by the unions). The LAST thing we need from the TSA at this point is a unionized workforce.
Until Obama decides to take a stand and place country over politics, we will continue to have problems not only in national security but in other areas as well (the economy, unemployment, healthcare, etc.)
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
This was the same explosive Tom Ridge saw used in the December 2001 attack by the infamous ‘shoe bomber’. Ridge had years to put safeguards in place to ensure this type of explosive couldn’t be carried onto planes – he obviously failed didn’t he?
Posted by: tierra | Dec 28, 2009 3:57:36 PM
************
Is this your talking point orders for today also??? How many blogs have you cut and pasted this on?
Once again I will ask, how do you know Janet Napolitano did not rescind any order Ridge may have had in place? Does it not concern you in the least that she thought the system is working? And please don’t answer with some ignorant reponse about Bush. That ship has sailed. Move on.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 28, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
This is the same idiot that ordered the use of the words “man made disaster” instead of terrorism. Same Moron who will not use words like Radical Muslim Fundamentalists. Now “we” heard her wrong!
She’s not just an idiot, but a dangerous one due to her position.
Posted by: TMc | December 28, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“Did you feel safer under the previous administration when they were commonly jacking up and announcing the code warnings to Orange or Red?”
The DHS website has the current warnting level at Orange (at least today they have the correct date).
“For all domestic and international flights, the U.S. threat level is High, or Orange.”
It is not as useful or helpful to bury the information in a link on a government website under “Check the Warning Level” rather than clearly announce them to the public.
Posted by: The Audacity of Copenhagen | December 28, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
all politicians, unfortunately are reflexively defensive, the country and all of us would feel a lot better regardless of who is in office if when something didn’t work, they would simply say we tried this and that, didn’t work and we’re trying new things right now to fix it, or at the minimum in Napolitano’s case Sunday or Bush’s with Brownie, just come out and say that ‘I could have said things better, I wasn’t clear, here’s what I meant and here’s what we’re doing’.
what Napolitano said was dumb, pure and simple, I’m a Dem/Progressive/Liberal/lefty
( fill in what I left out)
I doubt it will happen any time soon tho’.
Posted by: Oh Yeah | December 28, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
How can you back peddle on National Security statements, in troubled times, and still be respected and taken seriously as the Homeland Security czar??? Answer: You Can’t…She needs to go back to Arizona……….
Posted by: Parallex View | December 28, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Janet Napilatano must be fired. she is incompetent and a drag on President Obama’s popularity and national security. She has a documented history of gaffs and reportedly was a corrupt Attorney general of Arizona who enpanneled grand juries to investigate rivals of her big contributors in order to amass a campaign war chest for govonor. She was an incompotent goveror. Although married she is a darling of the gay community. However, that is no reason to keep this idiot as a liability to Barack Obama.
Posted by: TruthfulLiberal | December 28, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
I give up! Can anyone tell me what, if anything positive at all, has Janet Napolitano accomplished as Chief of Homeland Security since she took office?
Posted by: Ima Lert | December 28, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Janet Napolitano must be god as she is not concerned with a bomb on a plane.
Let’s put her out to pasture and get some other Poltican in the job. They couldn’t do worse if they tried.
Oh, and let’s implement some new regs for all the travlers who have never been a threat or in any “data base” but stand in line forever to get through this “tough” security that we have. They will feel safer if the line is longer.
Posted by: Jim W | December 28, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
What an embarrassment. She should be fired — it just shows that the Obama administration is incompetent from the top to the bottom. The American people definitely made a mistake putting a person lacking in so many ways to the White House!
Posted by: matthew | December 28, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
In yesterday’s statements, the Secretary proved herself a halfwit. She should be fired.
Posted by: henst | December 28, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Janet Napolitano is clearly not qualified for the job of Homeland Security Secretary. She’s a spin doctor. Instead of trying to find out how a known terrorist got onto a flight to the US on a US airliner, she said that the system worked exactly like it is supposed to ! Who is she kidding ? President Obama has a clueless Secy of Homeland security. She should be fired from a her job.
Posted by: E Kirby | December 28, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Here’s the actual quote . ..
“Once the incident occurred, the system worked,” she told me on This Week on Sunday. “The passengers reacted correctly, the crew reacted correctly, within an hour to 90 minutes, all 128 flights in the air had been notified. And those flights already had taken mitigation measures on the off-chance that there was somebody else also flying with some sort of destructive intent.”
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
How can you back peddle on National Security statements, in troubled times,
Posted by: Parallex View
you prove another colossal failure by Bush via Rummy,.
‘we know where the WMD’s are’ and he was running the war in Iraq…
so many more to chose from, a genuine miracle America survived the Bush administration..
Posted by: Ratso Rizzo | December 29, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am
I agree that Napolitano is not fit for Homeland Security, and it was absurd how she was talking on all those morning news shows when the incident occurred, Robert Gibbs seemed to understand the seriousness of it much better than Janet. I hope the head of Counterterrorism is not listening to Janet much, she always makes everything seem honky dory, including the immigration problems and drug cartel killings close to our borders
Posted by: R.L. | December 29, 2009, 2:06 am 2:06 am
Ja-No’s (Janet Napolitano) fantasy world
It has been, in the words of Queen Elizabeth II, an “annus horribilis” for DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. Beginning with her embrace of the impotent euphemism “man-caused disasters” to the hit job on conservatives and veterans that she was forced to apologize for, to her assertion that crossing the border illegally “isn’t a crime per se”, to her boneheaded claim that 9/11
terrorists came in through the Canadian border, Ja-No has confirmed time and again that she’s not ready for prime time. Today, she caps off her horrible year by playing Big Pollyanna in the
wake of the Flight 253. The botched bombing — foiled by a faulty detonator and brave passengers, not by homeland security bureaucrats or any preemptive measures by intel officials — shows that the in Ja-No’s fantasy world. If it weren’t for the “Flying Dutchman,” who I don’t believe works for TSA or Homeland Security, we’d have had a disaster. And Janet would be warming a spot under the bus. Let’s face it, she’s as effective as HS Sect as she was as Gov at stopping the invasion in her home state. Perhaps another 6 month study by a blue ribbon panel is
what’s needed here(just kidding). If these dopes were in charge in 1941 we’d all be speaking german and japanese. To be fair, does the White House know we are at war yet? Come to think about it, maybe they don’t? Why would I say that? Because the first thing the Administration did was get this psyco a lawyer! Then there was the news that the terrorist may need plastic surgury!
I’ll tell you what! Send this guy to any small town in America and we will give him some plastic surgery. Arizona’s gain was the U.S.A.’s loss! What a clueless clown. So let me see if I got this right. You don’t know what happened, or how it happened but you are sure that we are all safe until we point out you don’t know but you say the system worked but the system had nothing to do with a failed explosion (other than security measures make it tough to get a working bomb on board). When we point out the system did not work, then you agree to that. So we are left with a failed system run by you but you tell us we are safe but you don’t really know anything?
I guess her next comment will be “It depends on your definition of “the”.
Posted by: call me Roy | December 29, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Ratso…And…it will be a genuine miracle if we survive the Obama Adminstration who are…wait for it…… NOW IN CHARGE…
Posted by: Parallex View | December 29, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
This latest terror attack should be a clear and resounding wake up call to every man woman and child remindingg us that we are indeed at war with Muslim fundamentalists. And make no mistake about it…it is a religious war as much as if the crusaders of the early centuries were marching off to do battle with the heathen non Christians. Janet Napolitano must be removed from her position and a thorough and non political person be put into that position. Asisde from her ineptitude, Napolitano hardly evokes feelings of confidence nor savvy. What’s needed is someone with a “killer instinct” to put up the best defense possible against this unseen army.
They are out there to get us. War is war…I say do whatever it takes to minimize the damage. My fear is that there always will be some.
Posted by: Roberto Mazzetta | December 29, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
“to the hit job on conservatives”
___________________________________
The investigation into domestic terrorist potentials was actually initiated on Bush’s watch – they concluded right wing domestic terrorism was a major concern.
With some of the flap posted here, it seems entirely correct.
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm