By Britt

Dec 17, 2009 3:11pm

Nelson, Sanders Still Oppose Senate Health Reform Bill, Burris Sounds Open

ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports:

Democratic Senators say they could keep the senate in session for the next six straight days – all the way through Christmas Eve – to overcome a Republican filibuster of health reform legislation. But they also still have some convincing to do on their own side of the aisle. Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb, is still threatening to filibuster health reform bill unless language to further restrict access to abortion for people who receive government help paying for health insurance is included in the bill. Nelson's amendment to toughen a ban on federal funds being used for abortion coverage, which mirrored language in the House-passed health reform bill, was defeated by Senate Democrats Dec. 8th. But a written statement from Nelson this afternoon makes clear that while his amendment failed, he is not on board with the reform bill yet. Attempts to sway him to abandon a filibuster of the bill by defraying the abortion language with tax credits for adoption and teen pregnancy initiatives have not been successful. (he also said as much to AM radio station KLIN in Nebraska this morning) Nelson says he "is open to looking at additional attempts to maintain the federal restriction on public funding of abortion." So he's not a "no", just a "not yet." Sen. Bernie Sanders, from the other side of the spectrum, is also not yet on-board.  But there is some good news for Democrats from Sen. Roland Burris, the only person in the Senate who said he would not vote for a bill that lacked a public option. Burris' ongoing evolution on this point continued today as he said in remarks on the Senate floor that a vote for a Senate bill is not final and gives lawmakers more time to improve health reform. Our vote on this bill is not an ending. only a door to the next step of conference," he said. And Burris rebuked the sentiment of Howard Dean – "kill" the Senate bill – when he said: "After 100 years of debate we've come too far and worked too hard to turn back now. too many Americans are counting on us."

User Comments

Nelson and Sanders. Well all you “Palin lovers” out there. Here are two great examples of what happens when you send small thinkers with small minds and very narrow agendas to a “level” of leadership that they cannot deal with. Hope there are some of you who can learn from this. Our nation will never progress until we vote in people who can see and understand the big picture and vote for the overall good of the nation. Instead of “pandering” to small minded constituencies or the rich corporations.

Posted by: CND FOX | December 17, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Move-On has cast Lieberman as the devil. Yet Nelson remains as a
critical holdout. He is a serious
threat to Obama. Burris will go along
because of Durbin. Sanders will be there but is playing sort of the
progressive’s devil role. Giving much
to Nelson in the health bill will cost
other Senators to turn against. Maybe
Nelson can use a few new roads in NB

Posted by: Alan Kardoff | December 17, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Does any of this really matter anymore?

Posted by: B. Bear | December 17, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

I’m with Dean. Kill the bill.

Posted by: jan | December 17, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Alan K, if you think Nelson is only concerned about roads in NE (please consider getting the abbreviation right) you are forgetting two things. 1) Nelson is genuinely pro-life and providing federal funding for abortions is something he will almost certainly not vote for. 2) The insurance industry in Nebraska is a HUGE part of the state economy — Nelson made his living in that industry before entering politics. He is knows all too well how many jobs Obamacare would cost the state. Nelson will not be re-elected if he votes for this bill and Nebraska will send a second Republican Senator to Washington in 2012.

Posted by: Don | December 17, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Now that it is no longer a health bill but an insurance company dream, 30 million new customers that have to pay the insurance company premium set by the insurance company or pay a fine or go to jail. I have to agree with Howard Dean Kill the bill and start over with something that will help people not insurance companies.

Posted by: earl | December 17, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Because of a couple Democratic Senators and Lieberman and all the Republicans who care more about medical corporations than people this is even more a gift to the corporations than Bush’s Medicare drug plan.
The current bill preserves the Hyde agreement on no federal funding for abortion. Nelson is trying to kill insurance funded abortion.
Kill the mandate and pass the bill.

Posted by: Gary D | December 18, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.