Obama Administration Calls BS on Al Qaeda Claim
Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula claimed “credit” for the failed attack on the Northwest Airlines flight on Christmas Day, claiming that the attempted terrorist attack was retaliation for the December 17 airstrike against al Qaeda in Yemen.
Or in their words, “The oneness of our belief and brotherhood in Islam is what protected our young Nigerian man, the mujahid brother Omar Al Farouq to directly respond to his oppressive American enemy’s attack on the Arab Peninsula.”
A senior administration official rejects entirely the idea that the attempted attack was retaliatory, pointing out that Omar Abdulmutallab was in the field long before that airstrike. (He purchased his plane ticket in Ghana the day before, in fact, and had been in Yemen for months before.)
“He had been deployed before December 17,” the official said. “They’d like to make this seem like retaliation, but the reason they tried to blow up the plane is because they have a hateful, murderous agenda. And that’s why we’re on the forward lean against them.”
-jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
“And that’s why we’re on the forward lean against them.”
The only constituency the Obama Administration is engaged in a “forward lean” are members of Congress who may be wavering on supporting ObamaCare.
ObamaCare is his only priority. Everything else is a distraction to him.
Posted by: tjp612 | December 28, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Yeah right . This can’t possbly be anything important or else he would have to actually do something .
Posted by: nat turner | December 28, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Why aren’t we in Yemen taking care of these murderous lunatics? What is it going to take for the Obama administration to wake up, an airliner to actually come down out of the sky?
Posted by: Michael | December 28, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
What is it going to take for the Obama administration to wake up..
…
Hmmm. Who needs to wake up?
TP (from a few days ago):”Hoekstra is woefully uninformed if he thinks the Obama administration hasn’t “connected the dots” to Yemen. Yemeni security forces carried out airstrikes and ground raids against suspected al Qaeda hide-outs over the past two weeks “with what American officials described as ‘intelligence and firepower’ supplied by the United States. The assaults were Yemen’s widest offensive against jihadists in years.” President Obama reportedly personally approved the use of “military hardware, intelligence and other support to Yemeni forces” in their assault on al Qaeda… Moreover, both Obama and his homeland security adviser, John Brennan, have cited Yemen as a key concern.”
See also “Brian Ross, an investigative reporter for ABC News, first reported Friday night on the “ABC World News” program that US warplanes had been involved in the attacks. He said, “White House officials tell ABC News the orders for the US military to attack the suspected Al Qaeda sites in Yemen on Thursday came directly from the Oval Office.”
Btw, ABC… where is a report on Obama’s statement today? I read the transcript at Lynn Sweet’s blog.
Posted by: There is no Planet B | December 28, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Why aren’t we in Yemen taking care of these murderous lunatics?
__________________________________
We are in Yemen – did you not read the news of the recent strikes there and the killing of al Qaeda leaders? p.s. – how many wars do you think the country can afford on foreign soil?
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
This President, his Secretaries, and Advisers are incapable and unwilling to protect America and her citizens.
An “Isolate Terrorist”? Give me a break. This individual is part of an enemy force hell bent on the destruction of the US and our way of life. The President and his Administration appear to be more concerned about the enemy than America. He seems to think his oath of office was nothing more than reading a speech off a teleprompter.
How many must die, how many cities laid waste to get his attention? Would it even get his attention? I have my doubts. If, God forbid” a massive strike occurs New Years Eve in Times Square will he refer to it as an “isolated incident”? I think so. Smooth it over, let it go. Just a few criminals.
Posted by: Bob Tussey | December 28, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Posted by: Bob Tussey | Dec 28, 2009 4:17:40 PM
Seriously?
From Obama’s statement today, since I don’t see a link anywhere on this blog:
“First, I directed that we take immediate steps to ensure the safety of the traveling public.
We made sure that all flights still in the air were secure and could land safely. We immediately enhanced screening and security procedures for all flights domestic and international. We added federal air marshals to flights entering and leaving the United States, and we’re — working closely in this country, federal, state and local law enforcement, with our international partners.
Second, I’ve ordered two important reviews, because it’s absolutely critical that we learn from this incident and take the necessary measures to prevent future acts of terrorism. The first review involves our watch list system, which our government has had in place for many years to identify known and suspected terrorists so that we can prevent their entry into the United States. Apparently, the suspect in the Christmas incident was in this system, but not on a watch list such as the so-called No-Fly List. So I have ordered a thorough review not only of how information related to the subject was handled but of the overall watch list system and how it can be strengthened.
The second review will examine all screening policies, technologies and procedures related to air travel. We need to determine just how the suspect was able to bring dangerous explosives aboard an aircraft and what additional steps we can take to thwart future attacks.
Third, I’ve directed my national-security team to keep up the pressure on those who would attack our country. We do not yet have all the answers about this latest attempt, but those who would slaughter innocent men, women and children must know that the United States will do more than simply strengthen our defenses. We will continue to use every element of our national power to disrupt, to dismantle and defeat the violent extremists who threaten us, whether they are from Afghanistan or Pakistan, Yemen or Somalia, or anywhere where they are plotting attacks against the U.S. homeland.
Finally, the American people should remain vigilant, but also be confident. Those plotting against us seek not only to undermine our security but also the open society and the values that we cherish as Americans.
This incident, like several that have preceded it, demonstrates that an alert and courageous citizenry are far more resilient than an isolated extremist. As a nation, we will do everything in our power to protect our country.”
(hat tip Lynn Sweet and the Federal News Service)
Posted by: There is no Planet B | December 28, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
“The President and his Administration appear to be more concerned about the enemy than America.”
________________________________
Recent strikes against al Qaeda in Yemen, continuing strikes all year in Pakistan, and increase of troops in Afghanistan – yeah sounds like the entire security apparatus and the military of the United States is doing nothing.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
The time line does not matter so much. What needs to be understood is that they are responding to our interference in their affairs with violence as it is their most effective weapon. They will fight us forever it seems as our bellicosity runs deep. This will never end as long as we bomb their love ones and dictate policy within their countries for cheap oil. Is it worth the price? Maybe it is, but the fact remains: They kill us because we have been killing them for 60 years or so.
Posted by: Huh | December 28, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Well, OBL claimed AL-Q was responsible for 9/11 but we all REALLY know it was an inside job, right? So yeah, that was all BS too, lol. I don’t know if this WH is that ignorant or if they just think all of us are.
Posted by: jennifert7 | December 28, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
And in other news…
I need a job.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 28, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
jennifert7,
We pay and pay and pay for every barrel of oil we ‘take’ from these nomads that just happened to be living in a desert above this oil that was discovered less than 100 years ago. Did we get it cheap in the beginning? You bet… we found the oil, extracted it, shipped it and gave some of the money to the local Sheik for the trouble.
Almost 40 years ago, they decided that they could dictate price and have done so ever since.
Name me one Middle Eastern country where WE dictate policy. Pulleeezee. Get real. And these sons of comfort decide to blow us up? What if we had never discovered oil there? What would they have?
Ditto for Nigeria.
If we got out of the way, we could just stand back and watch them kill each other. Check your history book.
Posted by: RandyS | December 28, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
I am suprised he didn’t say the attack on the plane over Detroit was “Highly Objectionable”,that was the whimper he uttered when asked about the Lockerbie bomber being released by Scotland.
Posted by: Johnny L | December 28, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
RandyS”Name me one Middle Eastern country where WE dictate policy.”
Oh, I don’t how about the ones we invade. How about supporting Israel in light of their herding of Palestinians in their cages. How about propping up dictatorial regimes.
“Pulleeezee. Get real. ”
I am a real live boy!
Posted by: Huh | December 28, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
firstly, why would someone claim credit for an attack that failed? That seems weird in of itself. It seems to me that the radical Moslems are grasping at straws. Certainly this Islamic radical should’ve been prevented boarding an airplane. And certainly our security system, due to political correctness and ineptness, needs to be improved but, thankfully, the attack was not successful and the guy will be in prison for a longtime- if not forever. Why claim “credit” for that?
Posted by: Ed | December 28, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Why did it take until today for Obama to respond? Clearly this must be above his pay grade. After all he was on vacation. Napolitano can handle it, didn,t that turn out well. This President is well on his way of becoming the most hated man in America.
Posted by: PaulyFist | December 28, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Ed, though I agree with you on one point, the Obama administration is blind to terrorism (an “isolated extremist”, who was trained and supplied an explosive device by a known teerrorist GROUP.).
With that said, they claimed responsibility because it wasn’t a failure. They succeded in getting a working bomb on board an American airliner over US soil. That was a big, big sucess.
Posted by: Squid | December 28, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I think this shows the world what a viscious group this religion is…enough said.
Posted by: Alleen | December 28, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
“the Obama administration is blind to terrorism”
______________________________________
Are you crazy? The Obama administration has been making strikes against the al Qaeda terrorist organization in Pakistan all year, and strikes against more al Qaeda in Yemen – and has upped the number of troops in Afghanistan.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Al Qaeda is just like the kid that made a 60 on a test and celebrating the fact that it wasn’t a 30. Both are failing grades, but the kid is too dumb to realize it. They failed and they failed because people do not just sit by and do nothing anymore. Flight 93 heroes lesson is still with us. The government can not do it all, we have to take responsibility and action as well.
Posted by: gail | December 28, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Posted by: Squid | Dec 28, 2009 7:38:22 PM
Squid, I think you’re crazy to say “the Obama administration is blind to terrorism” when you know the Obama administration has been making strikes against the al Qaeda terrorist organization in Pakistan all year, and strikes against more al Qaeda in Yemen – and has upped the number of troops in Afghanistan.
“the Obama administration is blind to terrorism” . . . bull crap.
The commanders in Afghanistan gave the President SEVERAL options regarding troop increases – and UNIVERSALLY spoke in favor of the President’s decision. I’ll take their word over yours any day of the week.
You may think taking out al Qaeda leaders is ‘token’ but you can be assured our military commanders don’t think that . . . taking out these leaders is crucial.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Well… he has been Mirandized therefore given the right to remain silent so it’s unlikely we will get any information from him… so I guess it’s safe for the Administration to make such off the cuff claims of no organized terror group relationship…
It’s especially embarrassing for the Gov’t because this Al Qaeda splinter group is led by two former Gitmo detainees “Guantanamo prisoner #333, Muhamad Attik al-Harbi, and prisoner #372, Said Ali Shari”…
This is an inconvenient truth for the Obama Administration because of their operation to dismantle Gitmo and release or deport the detainees…
If these terrorists are released then we are in for much more of this stuff… both terror attacks and governmental disinformation…
Posted by: Chuck | December 28, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
It’s especially embarrassing for the Gov’t because this Al Qaeda splinter group is led by two former Gitmo detainees “Guantanamo prisoner #333, Muhamad Attik al-Harbi, and prisoner #372, Said Ali Shari”…
____________________________________
IF there is a connection, it should be noted these individuals were released in November 2007 – when Bush and Cheney were in charge.
No use trying to pin that on the current President.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Its funny how propaganda finds its way into everything nowadays… The government always accusing that it is only retaliating against people who just “feel like killing things and blowing themselves up”… What they fail to mention is that they’ve been supplying weapons to various nations since WW2, and all the “recent” violence can be considered a consequence of those actions.
Posted by: Aldabbas | December 28, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
I don’t know about you, but I feel soooo safe.
The system worked after all.
Posted by: Joseph Haas | December 28, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
I don’t know about you, but I feel soooo safe.
The system worked after all.
Joseph Haas | Dec 28, 2009 8:17:34 PM
How many people were killed by this attack again? It must have been a pretty horrific body count to turn an American into such a fearful coward.
I’m flying home with a connection in Detroit next week with my wife and 1.6 kids and yup, I do feel safe.
Posted by: jhw539 | December 28, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
@jhw539
The only reason there wasn’t a body count was because of a quick thinking passenger–NOT government action or procedure.
Posted by: Joseph Haas | December 28, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
The only reason there wasn’t a body count was because of a quick thinking passenger–NOT government action or procedure.
Posted by: Joseph Haas | Dec 28, 2009 8:33:14 PM
___________________________________
Same thing that happened with the ‘shoe bomber’ on George Bush’s watch . . . civilian vigilance is an important part of the effort.
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
What a spectacle…the ObamaShow debating with al Qaeda over time frames.
Chalk this one up as an extra point for Obama.
Posted by: bluecollarbytes | December 28, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Test run? See it! One failed supposed bombing. Then the same flight, a Nigerian ‘sick’ in the bathroom? Took an hour before anyone became suspicious! Do they even SEE this? Well, it’s Napolitano with Homeland Security, so it doesn’t surprise me.
Common sense is always the best policy. And we send our taxpayer money to this government for our defense. Too bad that they use it for all other reasons, such as social justice (COMMUNISM), except what it was intended for. Common sense doesn’t cost anything. But it is lacking in this administration that has more concern for a surfboarding friend, than of the fact that we may be looking at a test run of a new 9/11.
Posted by: clint | December 28, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
God was indeed watching over the innocent passengers on that plane. That is why the bomb did not go off.
Posted by: what667 | December 28, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Tierra… I blame both the Bush Administration and the Obama Administation… if Obama has his way then there are going to be hundreds of these terrorists released…
One was released because the Bush administration was under pressure from the media and the ACLU to start some sort of reviews of the detainees. One was released because he basically convinced the panel that he was a victim of circumstances and just wanted to return home to his life as a family man with a used furniture business in Saudi Arabia… after consultation with the Saudis it was decided that he was not a threat and the Saudis agreed to keep a close eye on him… of course as soon as he got to Saudia Arabia he skipped off to Yemen and became a leader of an Al Qaeda splinter group…
And I’m neither Donkey nor Elephant… It doesn’t matter to me if it’s Bush or Obama… truth is both administrations are too weak on terrorism… They should be tried as enemy combatants and if found guilty, executed, if not then let go, if convicted of a lesser crime then serve time… it’s that simple… it’s what we did with German spies and saboteurs and it’s what is needed now…
Western civilization is being threatened because of political correctness… call it profiling or whatever you like, but we need to heavily scrutinize the parties responsible for these attacks… if white Christian men start committing terrorist acts on Arab flights then they should undergo heavy scrutiny… the time for caring about offending people is over. There is a war on terrorism regardless of what the government wants to call it. If you prefer calling it “man-made disasters” fine… make the profiled class show up 4 hours before a flight and send them through the nude viewer or whatever it takes… but the sensitivities of a class are less important to me than the lives of innocents… things are backwards people and we have to stop pointing left and right and do what is logical.
Posted by: chuck | December 28, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
if Obama has his way then there are going to be hundreds of these terrorists released…
__________________________________
It seems right now if Obama has his way about 220 will be transferred to a maximum security facility in Thomson, Illinois to await trial of one sort or another. Do you have other information?
Posted by: tierra | December 28, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Yes I do… there are actually 210 detainees…90 have been cleared to return to their home countries under the Obama plan.
That leaves 120 to be tried by American courts. If only one of those cases are dismissed on grounds that apply to all of them (unlawful detainment for example) then they all walk… that would mean, as I said, hundreds could be released under the current plan to close Gitmo.
Posted by: Chuck | December 29, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am
if Obama has his way then there are going to be hundreds of these terrorists released…
__________________________________
Oh okay, I see now you didn’t really mean it that way . . . what you mean is if the court were to rule they’d all been illegally held (or some other rule of law) you think it’s possible they could all be released . ..
I think if “Obama has his way” then the guilty ones will be found guilty and punished appropriately.
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am
I think if “Obama has his way” then the guilty ones will be found guilty and punished appropriately.
Posted by: tierra |
That’s totally divorced from reality.
Obama is president and therefore he does have his way. He has chosen to release a number of detainees and he has not yet prosecuted, much less found guilty, a single one.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | December 29, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am
The appropriate punishment would be to detain them forever, until a military tribunal sentences them in Gitmo, not put them in the US, and give them rights under our Constitution. Which are rights that aren’t even being allowed to our US citizens!
The citizens of Thompson, Illinois will pay the property price for it as well. Putting terrorists in their town will drive down the housing…who’s going to live in a town with terrorists in it? And there is a nuclear facility 20 miles south of there. Does this Obama administration’s plans need any more explaining? No one with sane mind or love of America could come up with the ideas or plans that he has enacted upon this country, unless they were ones that planned to destroy it.
And this law enforcement approach to TERRORISM, is what Clinton did. Split the FBI and CIA, and you see what happened afterward on 9/11 because of it.
These kind of things don’t even need explanation. This is just common sense. Why do we even argue about this anymore? Let’s just organize the people in this country…which we have…and overthrow this despot. The people have reasons beyond what the Intolerable Acts of 1774 even could match. Average Americans can run this government…we need no radical Alinsky-supporting progressives. The time has come. “No More.”
Posted by: clint | December 29, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am
He has chosen to release a number of detainees and he has not yet prosecuted, much less found guilty, a single one.
_____________________________________
He has released very few detainees. I think we’ll see trials coming up in the new year.
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am
The citizens of Thompson, Illinois will pay the property price for it as well. Putting terrorists in their town will drive down the housing…
__________________________________
The citizens of Thomson are behind this move.
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am
*fear
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 3:45 am 3:45 am
No what I mean is what I said… 90 released to their countries… no trials, tribunals nothing… just 90 terrorists released with loose promises from the home countries to watch them, try them, or basically do whatever… and from what we’ve just witnessed “whatever” means to let them go lead terror groups.
120 will be moved to the continental U.S. where we live… here… in a Supermax… but here… where your family lives… you know… here… home… terrorists… then if they are found guilty they get sentenced… which could mean 7 years time served…. released… these are the ones that the home countries don’t want them back… so those that are released would be released… here to move in next to your family… my family… possibly given some of your tax money until they can get on their feet… here… in the U.S.
Once again keep in mind… you can’t deport if no one will take them… perhaps, assuming all are not released on technicalities, then a few will get life sentences, some will be released, possibly here in the states, and some will commit further acts of terror… only they will be here… at home… possibly living off portions of your and my wages…
We need to get out of this left/right, us vs them mentality… one side takes the opposite stance from the other side just because they feel they have to oppose them… we couldn’t possibly agree to just do what makes sense for the safety and well beings of our own citizens could we? Democrats and Republicans are the same… it’s a game and we are the pawns being played against one another… it’s how they maintain power… but that’s another discussion…
Posted by: Chuck | December 29, 2009, 6:33 am 6:33 am
What a total terrible joke. “We will not rest,” Obama said, “until we find all who were involved and hold them accountable.”
This statement was not given until he had spent several days resting, golfing, hitting the beach, and giving his Kwanzaa statement.
And no apparent problems with the “system has worked really very, very smoothly over the course of the past several days” until Janet Napolitano shifted course and agreed that the aviation security “system did not work” and had failed to stop the Christmas Day attempt.
If Obama was going to show some leadership, he should fire her, try to find someone who is not an open borders champion, union thug, or tax cheat to run homeland security. Think he would ever appoint someone like a marine general?
Posted by: Ed R | December 29, 2009, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Uh, Foghorn Leghorn, just a friendly reminder that the President, like the governor of a State, does not personally prosecute or find guilty or innocent anyone accused of a crime. That´s done by the judicial system, you know, the judge, prosecuting attorney and jury in the civilian system or the military judges in a military system.
Posted by: BachisBest | December 29, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am
what a shocker.. the anointed one takes office and the terrorists still want to destroy us!!! I thought Barry was going to calm them because of his muslim compassion. The only people he is uniting are the extremists!!! He is a weak president!
Posted by: kel | December 29, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Why are we treating this terrorist as a criminal? Even FDR took those terrorist to a military tribunal and had them executed. This Terrorist deserves no rights under our constitution,he is not a Citizen.
Posted by: stormerF2 | December 29, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
kel: “I thought Barry was going to calm them . . .”
Exactly. Now, liberals can see that it wasn’t the terrible Bush administration that angered those poor al-Qaeda terrorists. No amount of apologies or concessions will appease them. I would argue that it is the conciliatory tone and actions from this administration that have further emboldened them.
Between this and Fort Hood, Obama’s liberal approach to terrorism has failed. At least after the lessons of 9/11 were learned, Bush kept the homeland safe from attacks for the following 7 years. Obama hasn’t even finished his first year, and we already have 2 Islamic terrorist attacks both with ties to al-Qaeda. If this is any gauge, we all better prepare for more terrorist attacks for the next 3 years.
I guess those “right-wing, neo-con, nut-jobs” were right after all — al-Qaeda and the greater Islamic jihad terrorist movement are threats to be recognized and dealt with seriously. If Obama spent half as much time focusing on whatever is left of the war on terror as he has in pushing a government take-over of health care, maybe we could have thwarted both attacks. The American people now know where his priorities are, and they are going to let him know come 2012. Hopefully, we can survive Obama’s negligence, recklessness, and irresponsibility until then.
Posted by: Anonymous | December 29, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Now, liberals can see that it wasn’t the terrible Bush administration that angered those poor al-Qaeda terrorists.
________________________________________
No, actually we can see that Bush and Cheney backed off al Qaeda and Bin Laden in Afghanistan when they had them cornered and could have finished them off with the right number of troops. Instead they went for the neo-con obsession to attack Iraq.
Posted by: tierra | December 29, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
tierra: “. . . Bush and Cheney backed off al Qaeda and Bin Laden in Afghanistan when they had them cornered and could have finished them off . . . Instead they went for the neo-con obsession to attack Iraq.”
Nice theory except for the fact that the battle of Tora Bora that you refer to happened in December of 2001 and we didn’t invade Iraq until March of 2003.
If Iraq hadn’t supported and cooperated with international Islamic terrorists groups, such as al-Qaeda, didn’t continue to possess and pursue WMD, and didn’t violate numerous UN security council resolutions, maybe we could have allowed more troops to stay in Afghanistan. That would have been irresponsible — especially post-9/11. Regardless, the Bush administration did an excellent job of dismantling al-Qaeda, making it a shadow of it’s former self. Yet, as proven by recent events, the al-Qaeda threat remains. Unfortunately, as evident by his rhetoric and his action, we no longer have a president that takes that threat seriously. 2012 can’t come soon enough for America.
Posted by: Anonymous | December 29, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Not seeing why the bombing in Yemen can’t be the reason he was deployed if he bought his ticket the day before.
Are you people really believing that none of the attacks are retaliation for us continually bombing there?
How could that be?
Posted by: Andrea | December 30, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am
“Regardless, the Bush administration did an excellent job of dismantling al-Qaeda, making it a shadow of it’s former self. Yet, as proven by recent events, the al-Qaeda threat remains”
What kind of stupid statement is that???
Republican leaders and thier paid henchmen have been screaming about these al quida supermen since 9\11. It won them an election in 04. 06 – no, 08 – no, 10 – yea right.
They played out the fear card long ago yet they keep pulling it out at the drop of a hat.
We’re not that scared.
Posted by: Yea_Right | December 30, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
.We’re not that scared.
or smart.
Posted by: mjishernameo | December 30, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm