By Kristina Wong

Dec 15, 2009 1:56pm

Obama Administration to Seek Legal Authority to House Candidates for Indefinite Detention at Thomson Prison

Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report:

In a letter to Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn, five Obama administration officials – Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair, and Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano – formally announce that, per Quinn’s suggestion, “the President has directed, with our unanimous support, that the Federal Government proceed with the acquisition of the facility in Thomson.”

The officials write that the “President has no intention of releasing any detainees in the United States. Current law effectively bars the release of the Guantanamo detainees on U.S. soil…”

You may recall that on May 20, 2009, the Senate, by a vote of 90-6, voted to block funds needed for the transfer or release of detainees held at Guantanamo in an amendment to the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2009, an amendment that became law.

So does that mean that since the detainees won’t be “released” in the US, the White House is arguing their transfer to a prison on US soil would be perfectly legal?

“It is permissible under US law to bring in detainees for prosecution,” says a senior administration official.

Current law, said a second senior administration official, “would allow for the transfer to the continental United States of detainees to face trial

There are four categories of detainee currently at Guantanamo.

• First, “those who will face trial in Article 3 in federal courts,” the second official said. They “will be transferred directly to that jurisdiction.”

• Second, those who will be “transferred to our friends or allies overseas” will go overseas directly from Gitmo.

• Third, those who would face trial in military commissions will be housed at Thomson. The military commission trials will take place at Thomson.

• The last category consists of — as President Obama put it in his speech at the National Archives – “people who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases because evidence may be tainted, but who nonetheless pose a threat to the security of the United States.” 

So where would they go? The second senior administration official said that “there are no specific cases today that meet that standard that the President has signed off on.” They want Thomson to be a place for these individuals, but currently “it would be a violation of the law to transfer prisoners to Thomson for the purpose of anything other than prosecution” so the administration acknowledges they “will need some change of law… Ultimately the facility would allow for the detention of some number of detainees who the President outlined in the Archives speech as not being tryable either in federal courts or in military commissions.” And Thomson “would be a facility for such detention.”

The letter from the administration officials to Gov. Quinn notes that in a letter on December 2, “Illinois law enforcement authorities endorsed this plan in a letter to the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General” while more than “30 villages, towns, cities, counties, chambers of commerce, and other community and business organizations have sent letters, approved resolutions, or otherwise expressed their support for this plan.”

The move, they say, will address both “the urgent overcrowding problem at our nation's Federal prisons” and “will also help achieve our goal of closing the detention center at Guantanamo in a timely, secure, and lawful manner. “

The maximum security prison will house both Gitmo detainees, in a facility to be run by the Pentagon, as well as Federal inmates, in a separate facility to be run by the Justice Department.

“The two parts of the facility will be managed separately, and Federal inmates will have no opportunity to interact with Guantanamo detainees,” the officials write.

They underline that the “security of the facility and the surrounding region is our paramount concern. Thomson will be “enhanced to exceed perimeter security standards at the nation's only ‘supermax’ prison in Florence, Colorado, where there has never been an escape or external attack.” 

-Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

I just wonder how this is going to turn out. The way gangs thrive and grow in the prison system makes me only wonder how many converts to Islam they might get and how many home grown terrorist as a result. Or will they be isolated from the rest of the population. And if Obama wants to hold them there indefinitely then I expect the left to ne outraged and call for his impeachment.

Posted by: 'Un-American' | December 15, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

or run the risk of being hypocrits

Posted by: 'Un-American' | December 15, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

So that kind of blows the whole argument that closing GITMO will eliminate using it as a recruitment tool
for terrorist.
The detainees will be treated the same but just a different location.
Indefinite detention without a chance of ever getting out.

Posted by: larry | December 15, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Obama’s favorite crutch is to blame Bush. Yet he keeps many of Bush’s policies.
Vindication for Bush. And Obama ends up looking like a huge hypocrite.

Posted by: tyler | December 15, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Nothing good will come from this…

Posted by: Terry | December 15, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Real Clear Politics Poll
Job Approval Approve Disapprove Spread
Obama 48.6% 45.2% +3.4%
Congress 28.8% 63.3% -34.5%
Direction of Country Right Direction Wrong Track Spread
RCP Average 34.8% 59.5% -24.7%

Posted by: welcome to Obamaville,the fastest growing homeless community | December 15, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Just another of the foolish ideas of the Dems.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | December 15, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

===The maximum security prison will house both Gitmo detainees, in a facility to be run by the Pentagon,===
He promised hope and change. You may not get the hope but by golly, you are going to get the change. From Cuba to Illinois. Quite a change in scenery, no?

Posted by: Axey | December 15, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

CHANGE!!!

Posted by: Chuck | December 15, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

The third category worries me. “…people who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases because evidence may be tainted, but who nonetheless pose a threat to the security of the United States.”
I don’t see how this idea can work in the long run. Imprisoning people in Illinois without standing for a trial?
Nope… me thinks this will eventually go to court.

Posted by: Denbo | December 15, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Habeus Corpus fell into a coma under Bush. Now Obama wants permission to remove the life support.

Posted by: drouse | December 16, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.