By Jennifer Parker

Dec 13, 2009 10:36am

Summers to Bankers: ‘They’ve Got Obligations’

When I asked top White House economic advisor Larry Summers if the President needs to encourage banks to do more lending, he told me that bankers “need to recognize that they’ve got obligations to the country after all that’s been done for them, and there is a lot more they can do.”


Tomorrow, the President will meet with heads of the country’s biggest banks and Summers told me the White House has a blunt message: “President Obama is going to be talking with them about what they can do to support enhanced lending to customers across the country.

“We were there for them. And the banks need to do everything they can to be sure they’re there for customers across this country.”

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor agreed that there is a problem with scarce lending, but didn’t blame the bankers.

Cantor told me there is, “no question that there is a still a deprivation of credit in this country for small businesses. And when the president meets with the bankers, I hope that the discussion centers on what seems to be a real overreaction, if you will, on the part of some auditors in the regulatory arena that are looking at risk taking as something that just shouldn’t be done at all.”

User Comments

I do not know why you’re even talking to Summers and this is probably exactly why I won’t be watching GMA.

Posted by: jan | December 13, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

And unless those supposed obligations are made contractual, or otherwise compulsory, they will be ignored by the bankers – as is their fiduciary duty.

Posted by: Michael Leuchtenburg | December 13, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

What Obama going to tell them to lend money to all those people thst dont have jobs and no way to pay back the loan if they make it, thats how we go in the problem in the first place loaning money to people who couldnt possibly pay the dept. Beside the fact that Obamas Czar cut their sallaries. Thats how you make friends and influance people.

Posted by: earl | December 13, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

They used to have obligations, but our wonderful government decided that contracts no longer need to be honored. What is one of the dismantlers of Glas-Stiegal doing talking about this anyway?

Posted by: Huh | December 13, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

“no question that there is a still a deprivation of credit in this country for small businesses.” But we were promised that only government can solve that by its interference with market forces. So why not let the banks print their own money so the can sumulate the fantastic solutions government uses? What an absurd government we have.

Posted by: Werner Strasser | December 13, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Why on earth would the Bankers pay ANY attention to Obama? Does he pay their salaries? Does he control their bonuses? Does he affect their profits?
They have a requirement to look after profits in their companies — and they do it to their own self interest of salary and bonus…. not because they “owe it” to Obama.
Obama and his host of ivory league toadies and community organizer sponges do not seem to have a clue about how business works.

Posted by: Chaz | December 13, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

I work at a small community bank, the kind of bank that small businesses depend upon, and that the government has basically crippled. They have done nothing for us. They have identified those banks they deem too big to fail, and they have made them bigger. That is it. And Larry Summers knows it! He is a political hack.

Posted by: Konak | December 13, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Unless banks begin to fail again, there is no need to listen to Obamas begging to please help the economy. By allowing banks, to make their own decisions, AFTER receiving bailout funds, was a grave mistake.
Why would banks listen to Obama at this point?? they have already been bailed out, A little thoughful deliberate, planning, due diligence BEFORE TARP, would have been nice on the part of the current admin. Banks will continue to give Govt the finger, as now more than ever they are “to big to fail” and they know it.
Lets force banks to lend again, sounds like subprime loans, will soon be on the horizon again, as Obama pushes banks to lend, can anyone see a cycle forming???

Posted by: prichards | December 13, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“We were there for them. And the banks need to do everything they can to be sure they’re there for customers across this country.”
Unfortunately banks strongly disagree.
banks will do what is in the best interests of their shareholders period, the consumer be damned. How is Obamas loan modification program going?? (what a joke) Obama program,has been a dismal failure, banks don’t see helping their
customers as profitable.

Posted by: prichards | December 13, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Millions of people are shareholders in banks. Pension plans are heavily invested in banks. These investors have already lost most of their investment as bank stocks have collapsed over the past few years. Management made loans to people who couldn’t pay them back. They say big government passed laws forcing management to make poor loans. It looks like big government wants them to do it again. Mutual funds and pension plans may be in for another big hit if big governmentgets it’s way.

Posted by: Andy | December 13, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

It’s a shame that the previous administration ever bailed out these Banks and Insurance companies with their Billions in bonuses. But they had a lot of acquiesence from the likes of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. I don’t know why a mortgage loan shouldn’t stand on it’s own without having the government guarantee. This character Larry Summers is astonishingly shallow and in way over his head. It is time to listen to Ron Paul and get rid of the cronyism.

Posted by: Nicksr | December 13, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Try this on for size. The Community Fairness Act passed during the Carter Aministration got teeth during the Clinton years and Bush ignored it. Basically this act gave the government the right to blackmail banks into giving loans to folks that could not afford them. Acorn and other like organizations provided the muscle in the field and Barney Frank and friends put the pressure on Fanny and Freddie. Congress saw problelms and tried to pass a bill in the early 2000′s to prevent Fanny and Freddie from accepting these toxic loans but congress voted it down. obama, then Senator voted against it. The government was a major player in causing this economic down turn but are doing what they do best….blaming every one else.

Posted by: Thomas | December 13, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Posted by: Konak | Dec 13, 2009 12:37:19 PM “Why would banks listen to Obama at this point?? they have already been bailed out, A little thoughful deliberate, planning, due diligence BEFORE TARP, would have been nice on the part of the current admin” Well firstly you should get your facts strait. Let me ask you a question how could the current admin plan anything BEFORE TARP when TARP was put in affect and voted on BEFORE Obama took office?? Are you really as stupid as you sound that you dont know that the TARP was a product of the Bush admin. Obama was still a senator when tarp was being voted on idiot.

Posted by: Mike | December 13, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Posted by: Werner Strasser | Dec 13, 2009 12:28:45 PM Why on earth would the Bankers pay ANY attention to Obama? Does he pay their salaries? Does he control their bonuses? Does he affect their profits?” Your right he doesnt. YOU DO! Yoour tax dollars pay there bonuses. Thank you TARP and Bush for comming up with it

Posted by: Mike | December 13, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Thomas Said: “Try this on for size. The Community Fairness Act passed during the Carter Aministration got teeth during the Clinton years and Bush ignored it.”
====================================
LOL ………… “more” right-whiner rhetoric. It’s already been proven that of all the mortgages that defaulted a very small percentage (something like 8%) were CRA loans. Try these Republican laws out instead… Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, which repealed all regulation of investment banks and the Commodity Services Modernization Act of 2000, which created this fake insurance instruments called “credit default swaps”, which did not properly insure security mortgages… both laws pushed during a period when we had a republican congress.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | December 13, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

I am surprised that Obama or Summers can even spell obligations.

Posted by: jerry | December 13, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Mike Said: “Let me ask you a question how could the current admin plan anything BEFORE TARP when TARP was put in affect and voted on BEFORE Obama took office?? Are you really as stupid as you sound that you dont know that the TARP was a product of the Bush admin.”
=====================================
Mike… LOL… you really don’t expect any right-whiner to understand that, do you? I mean, these are the same people as that “birther” group that believes the President is not a U.S. citizen (LOL)… and you’re expecting them to be able to understand that TARP was a law put into place by G.W. Bush? You’re really expecting miracle de-brainwashing from some of the posters.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | December 13, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

How can anyone with half a brain listen to these obama jokers. I guess that explains some who are listening.

Posted by: jonny | December 13, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Let’s see, the banks got into trouble by lending money to people who could not pay. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae was told by Congress to lend more to less credit worthy folsk.
Fannie and Freddie foldes as did a number of other banks. Is the president being irresonsible by telling them to lend more!
He should look at his own actions and policies as to how they are hurting the vigor and long term optimism of America’s small business people and entrepreneurs. Who wants to leverage up more and take on more debt with so much uncertian taxes, regulations and the rest of the job killing democratic programs.

Posted by: scott jeffries | December 13, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Re: pritchards:
“Why would banks listen to Obama at this point?? they have already been bailed out, A little thoughful deliberate, planning, due diligence BEFORE TARP, would have been nice on the part of the current admin. Banks will continue to give Govt the finger, as now more than ever they are “to big to fail” and they know it.”
Um… TARP was a Bush-era program. Obama did not conceive or execute TARP. It was conceived under Treasury Secretary Paulson during Bush’s presidency.
I wish people came to debates with their facts straight. Misinformation helps nobody. Your self-righteousness and anger is misdirected, though I wish Obama had done more to hold bailed-out banks accountable. It’s too late now, and on that I agree with you.

Posted by: njones | December 13, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Obama says “Do as I say, not as I do!!”
Gee, moron, how ’bout LEADING BY EXAMPLE?!!!!

Posted by: Fed_up_with_BOTH_Parties | December 13, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Nicksr-Ron Paul has always been the answer. People will realize this in a few years. Trust me.

Posted by: Huh | December 13, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Responsibility? What about Congress Mr. President? You seem to be running interference.

Posted by: LongT | December 13, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Yes they do. To the American People who they have shunned. We rescued the banks and people will remember the way they were treated. Pay the bill banks.

Posted by: Steve | December 13, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

When Bush and cheney gave the bankers the money 5 times in 2008, it was to boost the economy and jobs. It was to give to businesses to get us out of the recession. BUt instead the Bankers held on to the tax payers money, investing in nothing.
When Obama gave the rest of the promised money from Bush and cheney it was for the same purpose. Yet the bankers still held back and have not invested in business and jobs.
The same banks and financial corporations that got us into this economic fiascal are the same ones holding onto tax payers money. Time to call them on it and put them in jail.

Posted by: Angie | December 13, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Angie….Put them in jail ? Obama is a continuation of Bush or maybe even worse.
Should we put him in jail too?
Obama is a one term president.

Posted by: CW | December 13, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Government leaders calling the bankers
fat cats who don’t get it. Try looking
in the mirror. Thats what I call the
kettle calling the pot black.

Posted by: wis134 | December 13, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

The Bush administration pushed TARP through in the fall of 2008 when the financial industry locked up and the whole economic system was on the verge of collapse. It was critical and it averted a meltdown!
President Bush did not use all of the money and left half of it for Obama to use.
TARP did accomplish the most important part of saving the economy.

Posted by: Greg | December 13, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Contrary to the media hype of a “new” financial order, the recent financial crisis created by the Federal Reserve keeps the “old” financial order in power that has governed since the reign of Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865).
In two years the “old” financial order has bankrupt, bought, or gained control of much of their banking competition, which they label by their media as “the shadow banking system”.
It should be no surprise that the largest monopoly banks left in power are Citibank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs.
All, except Bank of America, are part of the “old” financial order and mushroomed into power about 150 years ago during and after Lincoln’s Tax War, which Lincoln said he started solely to collect his new 40% import tax from Southerners under the Morrill Tariff Act of 1861.
With the passage of his National Bank Act of 1863, Abraham Lincoln, a puppet of Northern banks and industries, re-established Alexander Hamilton’s Centralist banking system in the United States, which set the foundation for the present day Federal Reserve System.
Under his First Legal Tender Act of 1862, Lincoln printed worthless paper money displaying images of Alexander Hamilton and Lincoln’s Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase (as in Chase Bank), which ultimately destroyed State banking.
Today, using their own created banking club, i.e. the Federal Reserve, these same monopoly banks, have so far crushed the likes of Lehman Brothers, Country Wide Financial, Bear Stearns, AIG, Merrill Lynch, Washington Mutual, CIT and have even gained control of Bank of America, whose leadership was not part of the “old” financial order that governs the United States.
This “old” financial order is founded on the principles of Alexander Hamilton, designer of the first U.S. Central Bank, who advocated that the public should be governed by an intellectual aristocracy maintained by the enlightened self-interest of the wealthy, rather than a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
Hamilton maintained, “That power that holds the purse-strings absolutely must rule.”
Today, most of the economic advisors to President Obama are Hamiltonians, such as, Robert Rubin, Paul Volker and Lawrence Summers, all previously employed by the “old” financial order and also members of the Hamilton Project think tank.
As these monopoly banks increase their control by eliminating competition, consumers and small businesses will have even more difficulty borrowing money at reasonable rates, because of less competition in lending. Witness their recent destruction of CIT, the largest lender to small businesses.
Consumers and small businesses will have to lick the boots of the few elitist banks of the “old” financial order to obtain a loan.
Right now these monopoly banks are borrowing from the Federal Reserve at 1% and lending to consumers, via credit cards, at up to 30%. Price gouging is always the result of establishing monopolies.
Reminds one of J.P. Morgan’s government contract with Abraham Lincoln, where Morgan bought Federal rifles from the U.S. government for $3.50 and then sold them back to the U.S. Army for $22. J.P. Morgan’s rifles were notorious for blowing off the thumbs of the soldiers.

Posted by: jebahoula | December 13, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Obama made a huge mistake when he signed a bill giving money to banks without insisting that the bill included requiring the banks to lend to businesses and homeowners needing to refinance at lower rates. Obama acts like he has no power at all, because he gives his power away. However the Republicans are much worse, they are bought and paid for by lobbyists. The Republican party will slowly disappear because they are the party of “no health care reform, no on everything.”

Posted by: Sally | December 13, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Obama was still a senator when tarp was being voted on
————-
Mike, are you really as ignorant of facts as your rant makes you appear?
Then-Senator Obama praised, encouraged, and voted for TARP. He wanted it, he encouraged others to vote for it, AND he voted for TARP himself.

Posted by: malcat | December 14, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

However the Republicans are much worse, they are bought and paid for by lobbyists. —posted by Sally
———-
How silly you sound with such one-sided statements.
Democrats get money from lobbyists also. In fact, they get money from the same lobbyists that give money to the Republicans.
Lobbyists don’t care about party, they are ‘equal-opportunity’ dispensers of bribes.
Seems to me, President Obama is down-right cozy with several lobbyists, they work for him.
Or did you forget that?

Posted by: malcat | December 14, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Time to call them on it and put them in jail.
————
What would be the charge, Angie? The crime of taking money that was all but thrown at them with no restrictions? The crime of making a profit? The crime of looking out for themselves, their stockholders?
I hope this country is still a nation of laws. Not all that sure anymore, but I hold onto that hope.
You can’t just throw people in jail because you don’t like their business practices….loathsome though those may be.
Anyway, many the banks who took bailouts are paying that money back, with interest, just as fast as they can.

Posted by: malcat | December 14, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Everyone who was involved with the Untied States financial meltdown of the economy is guilty has charged! YOU HAVE A LIFE SENTENCE AND WHAT GOES AROUND COMES BACK AROUND! Wall Street, AIG, Bank of America, Citibank, Freddie Mac , Fannie Mae
TO ALL THE CEO’S WHO WERE GREEDY! I HOPE YOU CHOKE ON YOUR BONUSES FROM THE TAXPAYER MONEY! CALLED BAILOUTS!
I HOPE AND PRAY TO GOD YOU SUFFER FOR THE REST OF YOUR MISERABLE LIFE. YOU ARE A MONGREL TO THIS COUNTRY!
NOW DO THE CEO’S UNDERSTAND HOW THE PEOPLE FEEL ABOUT THEM!

Posted by: BrendettNC | December 14, 2009, 7:20 am 7:20 am

I DO NOT TRUST LARRY SUMMERS.
HE IS A LIAR AND A CROOK HE HAS A BLACK PAST WITH ALAN GREENSPAN!
CHECK IT OUT ON FRONT LINE PBS!

Posted by: BrendettNC | December 14, 2009, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Obama just does not get it. The Banks made bad loans becaused the government threatened them with regulation to start with. Now Obama wants the banks to make more loans,that is what got us into this mess. Get Government out of Businesses business, and let the chips fall where they may.

Posted by: stormerF2 | December 14, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Bankers with “obligations”? This guy is in Wonderland.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | December 14, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Even PBS, not known as a hotbed of conservatism, says the congress is owned by the banking system. That the congress is financed by those they pretend to regulate.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | December 14, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

You sound like Bonnie and Clyde-hey, go easy on them bankers.Not enough cells to put them all in .Need money to build a special jail for them.They like traveling, send them overseas like Kabul or Baghdad.

Posted by: Omar | December 14, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Mike said: “Are you really as stupid as you sound that you dont know that the TARP was a product of the Bush admin. Obama was still a senator when tarp was being voted on idiot.”
from someone who did not like Bush for turning into a spend like a fool Liberal, you are correct. BUT YOU FORGET, that OBAMA voted YES on the TARP bill. He tried to just vote presen like he did on most others, but McCain stupid actions to go to DC to vote on it made Obama SHOW UP TO VOTE.
If I remember Correctly, their were MORE DEMOCRATS that helped to pass Tarp then they were republicans. If I remember correctly, the republicans in the Senate tried their best to not let it pass.

Posted by: ajax | December 14, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

“Obligations”! So does the White House and Congress!

Posted by: JV | December 14, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

see what is in the major newspapers; every hour world news, visit the link

Posted by: helen cohen | February 8, 2010, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.