The Presidential Planner
ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports: Following up on his economic speech on Tuesday, President Obama will meet with a bipartisan, bicameral group of members of Congress to “discuss the next steps for growing the economy and creating jobs,” in the Cabinet Room. Expected attendees include: Senator Harry Reid, D-NV, Majority Leader
Senator Dick Durbin, D-IL, Majority Whip
Senator Chuck Schumer, D-NY, Vice Chair of the Democratic Conference
Senator Patty Murray, D-WA, Secretary of the Democratic Conference
Senator Byron Dorgan, D-ND, Chairman of the Democratic Policy Committee
Senator Mitch McConnell, R-KY, Republican Leader
Senator Judd Gregg, R-NH, Ranking Member, Budget Committee
Senator Mike Enzi, R-WY, Ranking Member, HELP Committee
Senator Chuck Grassley, R-IA, Ranking Member, Finance Committee
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA
Representative Steny Hoyer, D-MD, Majority Leader
Representative James Clyburn, D-SC, Majority Whip
Representative Chris Van Hollen, D-MD, Assistant to the Speaker
Representative Xavier Becerra, D-CA, Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman
Representative John Boehner, R-OH, Republican Leader
Representative Eric Cantor, R-VA, Republican Whip
Representative Mike Pence, R-IN, Republican Conference Chair
Representative Dave Camp, R-MI, Ranking Member, Ways & Means Committee Afterward, the president will make remarks on job creation in the Diplomatic Reception Room. In the afternoon, the president will make a recovery act announcement on community health centers in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. Mr. Obama will announce that nearly $600 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act awards will go to support major construction and renovation projects at 85 community health centers nationwide and help networks of health centers adopt Electronic Health Records (EHR) and other Health Information Technology (HIT) systems. “Together, these three initiatives – funding for construction, technology and a medical home demonstration project – won’t just save more money, and create more jobs, they’ll give more people the peace of mind of knowing that health care will be there for them and their families when they need it,” President Obama will say. “Ultimately, that’s what health reform is really about.” Later, the president will meet with business and environmental leaders, supportive of comprehensive clean energy legislation, regarding the Copenhagen climate change summit in the Roosevelt Room. Mr. Obama will travel to Copenhagen next week at the tail end of the summit. “I think our hope is, and the international hope is we get an agreement on how to move forward on something that’s more binding,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs says of the UN-backed summit. In the evening, the president and first lady Michelle Obama will travel overnight to Oslo, Norway where Mr. Obama will accept the Nobel Peace Prize. — Sunlen Miller

Email
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Of course, Robert Gibbs and all the lying Obama cultists on this site will insist that Quinnipiac, like Gallup and especially Rasmussen, are not serious polling outfits—and should be boycotted like that evil Fox News.
Hide the Decline! Barack Obama’s job approval rating dropped to a new low in yet another survey, this time in the respected Quinnipiac survey. Obama can only muster an anemic 46% approval overall, with 44% disapproving and 10% on the sidelines. His domestic-agenda priority now has even lower support, and Obama is seriously underwater on a number of issues:
—American voters give President Barack Obama a split 46 – 44 percent job approval, his lowest ever, and both the health care reform package that he wants Congress to pass and his personal rating on handling health care now win support from less than four in 10 Americans, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.
Voters disapprove 52 – 38 percent of the health care reform proposal under consideration in Congress, and they disapprove 56 – 38 percent of President Obama’s handling of health care, down from 53 – 41 percent in a November 19 survey by the independent Quinnipiac University.
“It’s a good thing for those pushing the health care overhaul in Congress that the American people don’t get a vote. At this time, supporters are down 14 percentage points,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.—
Posted by: I'm not a President, but I Play One on TV | December 9, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Mark Penn, who worked as Hillary Clinton’s pollster during her 2008 run for president, reportedly received $5.97 million from $787 billion stimulus package so he could preserve three jobs at his PR firm.
Now hows that stimulus working for you, middle Amrica?
Posted by: nothing more than a photo-op | December 9, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Climategate: Gore falsifies the record… Still asleep at the Wheel Charlie Gibson?
Posted by: nothing more than a photo-op | December 9, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
What did Obama get the peace prize for again?
Posted by: Hide the Decline... | December 9, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Caroline Baum at Bloomberg writes today: “The real question facing the nation, and one that Obama’s summits and speeches aren’t addressing, is this: What if the job losses this time around aren’t temporary, the “ebb” part of the ebb and flow of the business cycle? What if employers are hacking away at their permanent workforce?
“There is support in the data for the idea that many of the lost jobs aren’t coming back. In November, a record 55.1 percent of job losses were categorized as permanent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The average duration of unemployment reached a post-World War II high of 28.5 weeks. And 38.3 percent of the unemployed have been out of work for 27 weeks or more, also a record.”
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
It’s easier to weigh in with disapproval.
Posted by: Cara A | Dec 9, 2009 11:07:26 AM
Easier for everyone: right, center, left or anywhere in between. It’s human nature that is hard to overcome.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Global Warming is a politician’s dream. It gives them an altruistic excuse to demand and exercise power over other people’s property. They don’t have to worry about producing ANY RESULTS themselves from that exercise of power. And the metrics of the issue are so amorphous that they can declare success at any time.
It reminds one of the Stimulus, doesn’t it?
Posted by: Climate Fraud | December 9, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
3.5 million jobs predicted by Obama;
3 million jobs lost since he took office;
.5 million jobs “saved/created”
Obama is at a net loss of 6 million jobs with his Stimulus Bill that has “done its job.” Tick tock.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
for the people who like easy answers, have no patience, want it their way or the highway even though they might not have any idea what they’re talking about, we agree.
Posted by: Cara A | Dec 9, 2009 1:17:57 PM
That would include the millions of people who voted for Obama thinking (hoping) he was going to “take care of them?”
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Actually I would say it’s not easy for intelligent people who follow along and have had to deal with complex situations
Posted by: Cara A | Dec 9, 2009 1:17:57 PM
So people who do not or cannot follow along and deal with complex situations are not intelligent?
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
That would include the millions of people who voted for Obama thinking (hoping) he was going to “take care of them?”
Posted by: Live! From DC! It’s Sat Night! | Dec 9, 2009 1:29:31 PM
What an absurd statement. Do you have a survey that shows that anyone thought that, or how many?
Posted by: Cara A | Dec 9, 2009 1:41:19 PM
Of course I don’t have a survey of what people thought. What an absurd demand.
I know that exit polls showed a heavy identification with Obama by ethnicity that he understood their cultures and what they needed from him. This from a candidate who campaigned on social justice and wealth redistribution. So it’s not such a gross oversimplification and I stand by my statement.
Voted for Obama:
Black – 95%
Hispanic – 67%
Asian – 62%
White – 43%
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
3.5 million jobs predicted by Obama;
___
in 18 months, it’s been 10 and economists agree we’re on track
Posted by: Jemma | Dec 9, 2009 1:56:51 PM
So basically, about 2.85 million jobs need to be “created/saved” in 8 months. That’s a lot of fake jobs from phantom districts. And he can’t rely on policeman, fireman and teachers much any more – 2010 will be layoffs in those areas. But if economists say it can be done, then of course I believe them.
And at that point, Obama will be at a net -3.0 million jobs plus whatever is lost in the next 8 months.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
“in 18 months, it’s been 10 and economists agree we’re on track”
Posted by: Jemma | Dec 9, 2009 1:56:51 PM
“ON TRACK”? Really?
“Even with the $787 billion stimulus package that Obama signed in February, more than 4 MILLION jobs have been lost in 2009, the worst year for job losses since World War II.” (USA Today 12/3/09)
The lesson, as always, is that Obama Cultists are utterly delusional.
Posted by: Obamatopia | December 9, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Of course you don’t, and that’s the bottom line.
Posted by: Cara A | Dec 9, 2009 2:23:30 PM
Of course. Chicken…
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Interesting that ethnicity plays a major role in party identification, especially since the Democrats run on social justice and redistribution of wealth platforms, which was racheted up to a campaign frenzy in 2008 where the highest percentages are revealed.
Voted for Obama, Kerry, Gore:
Black – 95%, 88%, 90%
Hispanic – 67%, 53%, 62%
Asian – 62%, 56%, 55%
White – 43%, 41%, 42%
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Democrats have always been the party of ordinary Americans. Republicans the party of the rich.
It’s easy to see that – Bush and Cheney being rich oil men out of Big Oil – Bush the son of a big banking family. Obama is from a regular middle-class family, same with his wife – they worked their way to where they are.
Posted by: tierra | December 9, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
The intelligence (and maturity) of everyday conservatives on display right here at Political Punch.
Posted by: Cara A | Dec 9, 2009 3:11:25 PM
By all means – ignore the issue.
Voted for Obama, Kerry, Gore:
Black – 95%, 88%, 90%
Hispanic – 67%, 53%, 62%
Asian – 62%, 56%, 55%
White – 43%, 41%, 42%
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
By all means – ignore the issue.
___________________________________
Democrats have always been the party of ordinary Americans. Republicans the party of the rich.
It’s easy to see that – Bush and Cheney being rich oil men out of Big Oil – Bush the son of a big banking family. Obama is from a regular middle-class family, same with his wife – they worked their way to where they are.
Posted by: tierra | December 9, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Democrats have always been the party of ordinary Americans. Republicans the party of the rich.
Posted by: tierra | Dec 9, 2009 4:10:36 PM
“According to last year’s election day exit poll, … separated voters into eight brackets of family income. It showed that Bush carried the white vote in seven of these eight brackets (all but the poorest) – and that he won by significant margins (see table) in six of the eight brackets, including by a 17 percentage point edge among whites with annual incomes of $30,000-$49,999.” – Pew Research, 2005
So to filter your statment through Pew Research, we can conclude that there are no white “ordinary Americans.”
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Or is it they cannot be “ordinary Americans” because they voted for him in those income categories.
Or is it they are rich even though they voted for Bush in all those income levels?
How exactly DO you support your statement? Because I can’t seem to reconcile it myself.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
“the familiar “Republicans are rich/Democrats are poor” stereotype is much more true now – at least at the extremes of the income curve – than it was a half century ago when the AFL-CIO was founded. However, when it comes to partisanship and income, the key battleground in American politics is in the middle brackets. And there, after a long slow climb that has occurred mostly in the past two decades, the GOP has reached parity with the Democrats.” Pew Research, 2005
Partisanship and income in the middle income brackets… the GOP has reached parity with the Democrats… Middle income brackets = ordinary Americans? Hmm very interesting.
Posted by: Live! From DC! It's Sat Night! | December 9, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I would prefer to think of the Republican Party as the party of the successful, the imaginative and the educated.Republicans tend to create the wealth, jobs and innovation that drive this country. They believe that those who take the risks and put out the effort to succeed should get the rewards won by those efforts.The Democrat party is largely the party of the unimaginative, the uneducated and the unmotivated. It is obvious that your average Republican has a higher educational level than your average Democrat.
Posted by: Nephron | December 9, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Obama has to bailout the banks, and send more troops to war, when can we bring our boys back and put the budget to better use, here’s an article with the latest.
Posted by: billy37 | December 9, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Partisanship and income in the middle income brackets… the GOP has reached parity with the Democrats… Middle income brackets = ordinary Americans?
_____________________________________
Because Bush and his propaganda campaign was able to dupe people into voting for him does not affect the fact the Republicans are the party of the rich and the Democrats are the party of ordinary Americans.
That’s why the Republicans stick with the fear and smear campaign against the Democrats – anything to win regardless what it does to the quality of the discussion and the tone of civility in America.
Posted by: tierra | December 9, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
What a bunch of dimwits! Green Jobs vs. Manufacturing, Obama VS Bush? You people dont see the big picture. The politicians on both sides are selling out the American middle class. We need more rules in effect to make lobbyist money/political contributions more transparent. We have them to blame for being in this mess now. They should start by placing a Unemployment and Retraining tax Tarrif on any company who moves jobs overseas. Also no TARP or Fed grant money to companies that off shored jobs in the last 2 years. Because of the 15.4 million unemployed people since the first of the year. Also close ALL off shore tax loopholes were it is cheaper to off shore a job then it is to create one in this country. Small Business for job creation? If youre talking about min wage part time work for Teens and college students thats fine. But to raise a family in minimum wage and part-time work you would have to count of government food stamps to just eat. I bet 90% of those jobs got off shored to call centers for customer service for everything from credit cards, DSL/Cable, Digital TV, Cell phone , gas/electric utility to any customer service or computer help deck position. This is the state of America today. It is a national disgrace. It has completely destroyed the American middle class and ruin countless lives. Its all about cheap labor and corporate greed.
Posted by: Mark Capson | December 10, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm