By Jennifer Parker

Dec 4, 2009 12:55pm

‘Tripartisan’ Press Conference Becomes Public Option Debate

Day 5 of the health reform debate continues on the Senate floor, but the real work is getting done behind closed doors, where moderate and liberal Democrats, and a few moderate Republicans are trying to find a reform plan that will get 60 votes. My colleague on Capitol Hill, ABC's Z. Byron Wolf, is following the story: The tensions were on display Friday at a “tripartisan” press conference called to highlight moderate Senators’ cooperation in creating a battery of amendments, but which turned into a debate on the merits of a public health insurance option between Independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who caucuses with Democrats, Democrat Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Republican Susan Collins of Maine. Lieberman reiterated his pledge to filibuster the Democrats’ bill if a public option is not stripped, calling a public option a “foot in the door” to a single payer, government-run health care system. Collins agreed, pointing to the failure of Dirigo, a public health insurance option set up in Maine to insure more than 100,000 Mainers without insurance, but which now insures around 10,000, she said. Specter, a former Republican seeking reelection to the Senate as a Democrat who supports a “robust” public option, asked to offer a rebuttal to Lieberman and Collins at the press conference with them and said the government has learned lessons from Dirigo. The three have crafted a battery of amendments they say would improve Democrats’ bill by, among other things:  quickening the pace for a pilot program to bundle Medicare payments to doctors and hospitals, creating a continuum of more effective care, stiffening penalties for hospitals that incur the most infections among patients, and creating a streamlined rating system for doctors. Lieberman and Collins, at the outset of the press conference, said the bill, as written by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid with pieces from bills passed earlier this year by two committees, has good elements. “The bill may look so good that Sen. Lieberman might able to make some accommodations,” said Specter, to laughter from Lieberman. But don’t look for accommodations any time soon. Lieberman was asked if compromise public option language being crafted by Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware, could gain his vote. “I respect Tom Carper and he is a dear friend,” said Lieberman. “But the answer is no.” Lieberman said he hopes Democrats will drop the public option soon because the debate has turned from an attempt to improve health reform to an attempt to come to a political compromise. Collins said Carper had called her twice in recent weeks, including the day before Thanksgiving, to court her support, but she would not be swayed. “This is a philosophical difference so it is not easily compromised,” she said. The same could be said of abortion rights, another hot button issue in the health reform debate, but not at this press conference. Collins, Lieberman and Specter, all who support abortion rights, all also support language in the bill as written by Reid that would restrict the use of public funds for abortion services. Some Democrats, including Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, who want to stiffen Reid’s language to more closely resemble language written by anti-abortion rights Democrat Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich. That language would further restrict abortion services to people receiving subsidies to buy health insurance and passed in the House of Representatives version of health reform.

User Comments

Dear ABC News: Why isn’t this a top story on your newspage today? This is the most important, most critical issue of our time, and it’s buried on your site. Please, lets get the public dialogue going. Plus, Joe Leiberman is dead wrong on this issue. We need a public option. Only 60% of employees get insurance from their employers. 40% don’t, and the unemployed don’t. We will tank our society and become a nation of poverty, as well as non-competetive in the world market if we don’t take care of our own people first.

Posted by: travelertraveler | December 4, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

These three Republican wolves (yes, Lieberman is a masked Republican) cannot be trusted, and certainly DO NOT represent “tri-partisan” positions.

Posted by: Margot Faubion | December 4, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

no public option two thumbs up to liberman,collins and all blue dogs hold your ground you still can do reform without a complete overhaul lets put it this way people your dealing with a goverment that just doesnt understand the middle class and what they want and its certainly not any goverment near them.

Posted by: natale from mass. | December 4, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

All this waste of time and money, is a travesty on the taxpayer. Kill the bill, and let’s spend some time on something productive.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | December 4, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

The majority of the American people want the public option killed. why are they wasting our time on this? To satisfy the moonbat base? Let’s get some real reform with some cost containment like tort reform.

Posted by: jonny | December 4, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

After the government wanting to stop mamograms for women under 50,I would never want them making decisions and they would be rationing mamograms so only 15% of the women 40-49 years old diagnoised with breast cancer would go un-detected till it was to late.NO to Government option,No to Government run health care.

Posted by: lightningF | December 4, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Kill all Health Care bills now pending, kill the cap and trade abomination (forever) and go back to the starting line. Changes can be made to HC without throwing the baby out of the bathwater.

Posted by: mtovet | December 4, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Some real reforms are not even being discussed.
– Allow individuals to band together to purchase group health insurance (without being an employment-based group) and negotiate favorable rates like large corporations and unions do.
– End the exemption for ‘self insured’ plans. If an employer wants to ‘play insurance company’, let him be regulated like one.
– End cost-shifting. Privately insured folks should not have to pay extra to cover those don’t or won’t pay.
– Standardize all insurance forms and information systems to cut down on paperwork and administrative costs (currently about 20% of each health care dollar).

Posted by: Joe White | December 4, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

The current health care reform bill is a disaster. Frankly, this bill is no different than the Smoot-Hawley Act. Just as that legislation cemented our plunge into a full blown recession in the 1930′s, health care reform is having the same impact. Businesses are down right fearful of the excessive taxation that will be required to pay for it; some estimates put the total at $6 Trillion dollars over the next decade. This is having an absolute chilling affect on the jobs market.
Unfortunately, Cap and Trade is just as bad and will have nearly as great of a negative impact on jobs as the health care bill.
Let’s hope sanity return to Washington before our economy becomes permanently harmed.

Posted by: Jenny | December 4, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Screw heath care this year and lets take out all these corrupt bums in 2010 then do it right. And also lets get someone in there with a modern common sense approach to our flawed Marijuana laws.

Posted by: Todd | December 4, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Based on the defection of non-college educated whites from Obama’s camp, the outcome of the 2010 mid-terms has been decided. Obama’s “Whine” party will be replaced as the majority party in Congress by those who didn’t like the company there but found what was missing at an old-fashioned “tea” party instead.

Posted by: Rob | December 5, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am

Government option?
We don’t need no stinking government option.
Where’s the Tort Reform?
Aren’t they serious about bringing costs down?

Posted by: Noz | December 5, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Add a .50 tax to every fast food order which exceeds 500 total calories. With the millions of those sold every day in America, that would help illuminate the issue, discourage the consumption a little, and toss billions of dollars into the kitty to finance health reform — saw a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

Posted by: Reg373 | December 5, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

The senators, both right and left, should not be focusing on what they can fix. Obama has called the public option not a critical component. toss it and move along.
The public option is not the answer. the largest insurer, Medicare, cannot manage costs and is BROKE. Many non-profit plans (BCBS) in many states started out as essentially public options in their states. Many remain non-profit, but control the vast majority of insurance in a given state.
However, premiums increase at double digit rates. Public insurance, is not going to lower costs. It will not give folks rates lower, if not even higher than what they can buy now.
Ultimately, the public option is for the government to take over health care. No if, ands or buts!

Posted by: scott jeffries | December 6, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

“Kill (the) Bill”… Vol. 1,2,3, as many as it takes…

Posted by: jafo | December 6, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Did Reid say that all republicans would support slavery, and would not support womens rights today? I saw where he did. ABC ought to report that. Also, there is a huge story about Climate control that is not being covered by the affiliate either. You all really do mute the press for the DEM Party dont you. I didnt believe it but I do think it is true. My question is WHY!

Posted by: jim | December 7, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.