Where is bin Laden? Secretary Gates Says No Intel in ‘Years’
Defense Secretary Robert Gates told me that the U.S. has not had any good intelligence on the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden in "years."
He also couldn’t confirm reports that a detainee in Pakistan had claimed that he had information on where bin Laden was earlier this year. He made the startling admission during my interview with him for "This Week" airing Sunday.
Here's the exchange:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: "The Pakistani Prime Minister shrugged off any concerns about that this week, about whether or not he’d done enough to go after Osama bin Laden. He said he doesn’t believe Osama is in Pakistan. Is he right and do you think the Pakistanis have done enough to get him?"
DEFENSE SECRETARY ROBERT GATES: "Well, we don’t know for a fact where Osama bin Laden is. If we did, we’d go get him"
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: "What was the last time we had any good intelligence on where he was?
DEFENSE SECRETARY ROBERT GATES: "I think it’s been years."
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: "Years?!"
DEFENSE SECRETARY ROBERT GATES: "I think so."
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: "So these reports that came out just this week about a detainee saying he might have seen him in Afghanistan earlier this year, we can’t confirm that?
Gates: No."
You can watch the complete interview with Gates and Secretary Clinton Sunday on "This Week."
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
What in the hell is the matter with this administration!!!!! Stupid stupid stupid!
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Realman1963, Giving info works both ways if you really think hard about it.
Posted by: lonewolf1044 | December 5, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
???? You must be desperate for insults to the Obama Administration to come up with that one, “real man”. It was the Bush Administration that failed to get bin Laden before 9/11, ignoring documented warnings from the Clinton Admins to make his capture/death a top priority. It was the Bush Administration who let him slip through their fingers at Tora Bora, and it’s a former Bush Admin official who says there isn’t reliable intel on his whereabouts… and hasn’t been for a long time well into the Bushie years.
What are you going to accuse Obama of next? The Cole bombing? Oh , I know, accuse him of having complicity in Watergate. Doing so makes about as much sense as accusing Gates of showing terrorists that we don’t have actionable intel of bin Laden’s whereabouts. I think the terrorists know that. Duh.
Posted by: Dave1964 | December 5, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Dave; Why would you let anyone know what you know and what you don’t know? One of the cannons of intelligence isn’t just gathering intel, it’s also keeping from the enemy what you do know. Yes, Gates was from the Bush years, but why would he just come out with this? What good does it do?
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
This serves no purpose that I can see.
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Of course it’s more important to keep up the lies about him being dead. The hidden Oligarchy is using his existence as a way to keep the public fearful.
Posted by: rich | December 5, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Although it is convenient and easy to think our government is full of morons, I think (and know) there are some very bright people in public service. To me, the really dumb thing would be to admit we had any intelligence on Bin Laden. It is better for your enemy to think you have no idea what they are up to in my humble opinion.
Posted by: MIguy | December 5, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
JDouglas; And how do you know that for a fact? I know lots of people believe that, but there’s never any supporting information given. I mean you give the exact date of Dec. 12, 2001. Where is your supporting evidence. He may be dead, but I’ve never heard anything really concrete.
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
George Bush took the emphasis off Afghanistan where it belonged – and where bin Laden was hiding – and went into a country (Iraq) that had nothing to do with 9/11. The WMDs were not there, Bush had no exit strategy, and none of the neo-cons had a clue. They thought our troops would be welcomed with open arms – instead the Bush administration sacrificed more American lives to the senseless Iraq war than died in the twin towers. After all the last administration’s moronic blunders, I don’t know if we can still salvage the REAL war in Afghanistan but we sure better try. Bush lost us Bin Laden and maybe Afghanistan too. “Mission accomplished,” he said. Riiight.
Posted by: Cassandra | December 5, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Probably buried in one of those hills in Afghanistan
Posted by: rightbehind | December 5, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Figures, bush let him off the hook, the idiot.
Posted by: Jim Bob | December 5, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
It’s better for us that that he remains a mystery, that way the worlds governments can keep up the scare tactics!
Posted by: rich | December 5, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
We can read a license plate from 200 miles away, but we can’t find a 6′ 4″ Turban guy on dialysis, anywhere ?? Puzzling.
Posted by: cfiman | December 5, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Thank God Obama kept this “genius” from the Bush administration… Nice choice “Barky”, now WHERE is the “change”, let alone the competency!!!
Sounds like somebody couldn’t locate a certan anatomical part of their body with a map, both hands and a flashlight!
Is ANYBODY in politics held accountable for their failures… EVER!!! My God!
No keep Gates on, he’s admittedly succeeding at something… FAILURE!!!
Posted by: jafo | December 5, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
I think Gates blundered with this. Maybe Gates doesn’t really know? One of the highest top secrets in WWII was cracking the Japanese codes early on and not saying anything about it one way or the other.
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
We can read a license plate from 200 miles away, but we can’t find a 6′ 4″ Turban guy on dialysis, anywhere ?? Puzzling.
Posted by: cfiman *****************
He changed his name hee,hee…Don’t tell
anyone.
Posted by: spacerook | December 5, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
It’s because he’s DEAD!
He was hospitalized in 2001, he had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, he doesn’t have the best healthcare money can buy (unlike Congress) and what’s her name (her name does escape me) who ran for office in the Middle East SAID he was dead, right before *gasp* she was assassinated. Probably by the CIA.
He’s dead. the US military *could* have caught him, but what good would that do their Orwellian agenda? They needed him to be on the loose so they could ramp up the fear so citizens would willingly sign away more and more of their own rights.
Posted by: Phil E. Drifter | December 5, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Is anyone suprised at all by this news, I am not, Bin laden was recruited while in universty in america by the CIA, his was well trained to help over throw a setting government america did not like but just like Castro and Sadam Hussein we blew it and they turned against us, no great suprise anyone willing to turn their backs on their own country men should have never been trusted in the first place.
Posted by: tealtripod55 | December 5, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Phil E. Drifter; That is definitely a class A conspiracy theory! It’s got it all! By the way, her name was Benazir Bhutto.
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Bin Laden may have long been dead and buried. Of course the al-cheda gang would rather prefer the world sees him as an elusive and invincible character that cannot be captured.
Posted by: what667 | December 5, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
lone, yer comment doesnt warrant a response. you never admit a weakness to the enemy, thats a no brainer
Posted by: realman1963 | December 5, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
If I was Gates and I had leads on bin Laden’s location, I’d still tell George we don’t have a clue. Why tip al Qaeda off? It’s the height of conceit that George and ABC think Gates would have told them about information we have on bin Laden! Anyway, the fact that I’ve never heard of anyone doing a voice analysis of the recordings (there hasn’t been any video since about 2002) claimed to be bin Laden. Why not? In the past, such possibly-attributed to so-and-so recordings on answering machines, etc. were always voice-analyzed by ABC News, etc. Why not the bin Laden tapes? Maybe he’s dead (he’s been on dialysis for years) or maybe he’s disguised his appearance and doesn’t want to give that away.
Posted by: The_Mick | December 5, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
What are you guys taking about….Bin Laden is scheduled to be on Larry King this week
Posted by: Mr. B | December 5, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
He is dead. He won’t be found. He was on Peritonial dialysis for kidney failure on 9/11. He would not have survived this long in the mountains all these years. I myself did this procedure and was spared by transplant. Others have taken up his fight but OBL, himself, is dead. It is not about one man anymore.
Posted by: David Wardell | December 5, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
obl or as he was known when on the cia payroll tim osman has been 6 feet under ground since christmas 2001.
Posted by: rxgary | December 5, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
ignoring documented warnings from the Clinton Admins to make his capture/death a top priority.
———
Everything was just peachy-keen under President Clinton….no unemployment, no deficit, no problems…right? That’s what all you Democrats keep saying. Everything was sunshine and roses right up to the day President Bush took office.
So why didn’t President Clinton get OBL? All that wonderful information that President Clinton passed on to President Bush that President Bush just ignored. Right?
So why didn’t President Clinton, with all that wonder intelligence catch Osama Bin Laden during his eight years in office? Anyone…
Posted by: malcat | December 5, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
What are you guys taking about….Bin Laden is scheduled to be on Larry King this week
Posted by: Mr. B *****************************
LOL….It is a professional courtesy, since King
was on the Bin Laden talk show last month.
Posted by: spacerook1 | December 5, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
If Obama had bin Laden in his sites, he’d probably do what Clinton did when he could have gotten bin Laden – wimp out. Let’s hope the military misunderstands Obama and shoots first and apologizes later. Otherwise, we’ll need another President like Bush to come in and take the terrorists on with conviction and unrelenting purpose.
Posted by: rdh | December 5, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I’m still waiting for someone to give me a logical excuse..uh explanation what President Clinton did not just go into Afghanistan and swoop Osama bin Laden up. I mean Pres. Clinton had been in office for 8 years.
He had all the information all ready for the new incoming President. He had the country in fine shape, right? Why not just do it himself? You know, go out in a blaze of glory!
I’ll tell you why; Clinton didn’t want to get involved. If he had tried to capture OBL, he would have have the same problems that kept our military from capturing since the war began. Aghanistan and the government of Taliban were protecting OBL and his gruesome group of murderers.
The mountainous region where they hid out is like swiss cheese with natural and man-made caves connected by extensive tunnels that permitted large groups of men to travel for considerable distances, totally undetectable by radar or satellite.
This ridiculous assertion that President Bush “let” OBL slip through his fingers is disgusting. President Bush made a mistake, a major mistake, by invading Iraq and neglecting the war in Afghanistan. But it was a MISTAKE, not a deliberate act. He goofed, big time.
We don’t even know when OBL left Afghanistan, or when he returned, or when he came back, or when he left, and on and on. We have rumors and reports…from people that lie for the joy of it.
I believe he’s dead…don’t know when or where the body is…doubt if we will ever know. He was receiving dialysis for kidney failure in 2001. Some people can tolerate it fairly well, but most are left debilitated and frail. A cold can kill as fast as poison. Most people don’t live very long without a transplant. I know, I lost my first fiance many years ago.
It is important to Al Qaeda and their supporters that he is believed to be alive and actively guiding the glorious war against the US.
But if you want to believe President Obama can find him, go ahead. If he is alive, I hope and pray he is found…alive…so he can be tried and executed like the hideous monster he is.
But grow up and face reality. President Bush made mistakes, but he did the best he could. He’s not a traitor, he’s not stupid, he’s not an evil monster. He’s a human who made mistakes.
Posted by: malcat | December 5, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Before we went into Afghanistan, we were graced with bin ladens videos quite frequently.
Since we cooked Tora Bora, there have not been any real clear videos of this terrorist. Oh we’ve had audio, that is supposed to be him and some hazy, grainy video of some guy in rags, but not the videos of him sitting infront of the camera like before.
I think he’s dead. Been dead for quite some time.
Posted by: neil | December 5, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
If he is alive, big IF, I have an idea that might flush him out.
Make a bunch of bogus announcements that the medical industry has just created the do-all be-all in dialalosis machines. Some break through technology that Europe is now available.
Stuff this machine with listening, video, and gps tracking.
Then wait for the order….
Posted by: J J | December 5, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
The current democratic congress, president, and his administration have been threatening the CIA with investigations for a long time. It is quite possible that the CIA is not letting this administration know anything as retribution which is fine with me for many reasons that are too long to discuss here.
Posted by: BT | December 5, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Bush didn’t want binladen, he wanted Saddam. Well, here we are because bush had the power to follow his dreams.
Posted by: Ken | December 5, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
GATES,AND THE MEDIA ARE LYING TO YOU—————–BIN LADEN HAS BEEN DEAD SINCE 2002,OF KIDNEY FAILURE.WHAT IDIOTS!
Posted by: debbie | December 5, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
OSAMA’S OBITS WERE IN PAKASTAN,UAR PAPERS.HIS MEN BURIED HIM WITH GUN SALUTE.
Posted by: debbie | December 5, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Anyone who believes this BS needs their head examined.
A nation that can kill with a unseen drone operated by a guy in a cubicle in Langley… A nation that has satellites circling the globe, with the ability to see and ID things as small as license plates on cars… and all the really advanced tech that is kept from public knowledge… not to mention the hundreds and hundreds of $$$Billions of dollars spent in the ‘Terror Wars’ …
And we, the dumb taxpaying public, is supposed to believe that the ‘instigator’ – the man, who if he did not exist there would have never been a 9/11 – is too difficult to track down and now for years upon years there has been no intel on his whereabouts.
This is nothing more than further proof that 9/11 was indeed an ‘Inside Job’, perpetrated on the American public and the world by the ‘Hidden Hand’ that hides behind the CFR.
This would all be laughable were it not for the Murdered Firemen, Policemen, Office workers and pilots and passengers. And all the death that followed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and now, Iran? There will be a day of reckoning. I’m glad that blood – enough to fill a large lake – is not on my conscience.
Posted by: KPR | December 5, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I believe he is working at some fast food joint in some American city. He figured that the easiest way to kill us was to stuff our faces with toxic corporate fast food.
Ok seriously though, it really doesn’t matter. As long as we kill Muslims for no real good defensive reason, and as long as we threaten them all with sanctions for not doing our bidding, more Osamas will rise up. So Osama is irrelevant at this juncture. He might be in the ground somewhere. Who knows.
Posted by: Huh | December 6, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Bush = Fail
Posted by: Jim Bob | December 6, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
I found a document that tells where Osama bin Laden might be. It is definitely worth checking out and it is not near the Afgh-Pakistan border.
I have attempted to give this info to the CIA, CentCom and to Secretary Robert Gates, but I have never gotten past the Public Information Officer. I seriously question if our leadership wants to get ObL. They may want him to be the victim of an earthquake, disease or maybe he will have an accident while playing with firecrackers. After all, if they got ObL, there would be a major push to bring our troops home.
W. Bush allowed at least one loaded plane to fly to Saudi Arabia during the no-fly time after 9/11/01. Was ObL on one of those planes? Did ObL ever work for the CIA? Is he still on the U. S. Government payroll? If ObL smiles for a drone, is the drone jockey authorized to pull the trigger?
Posted by: hurleyvision | December 6, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Bin Laden died eight years ago this month. That’s why sixth months after 9/11, Bush said he didn’t know and didn’t care where Bin Laden was, he knew that Osama had died.
Posted by: LewScannon | December 6, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am
Maybe if the CIA would put a high enough price on Ben Ladin’s head they would get some intel.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | December 6, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Obama stated in his speech at West Point that we were going after al qaeda who planned 9/11 at the epicenter of where
they planned that and are currently planning more.
Truth is, we are escalating to fight the Afghans for their own country. Bin Laden is dead. According to all reports, what is left of al qaeda is in northwestern Pakistan. Our troops are being sent to southern Afghanistan.
It is turning out that Bush and Cheney were right to move the front of the war out of Afghan. No one has ever defeated those people. They ran al qaeda out which was their mission going in. They kept a minimal number of troops to ensure they didn’t come back.
When Obama got in office, he immediately stepped up the bombings in Afghanistan and escalated the war there by driving more and more Afghans to join up with the Taliban to fight us and run us out of their country.
This is not going to end well for the US on top of the fact, we cannot afford it.
Posted by: Susiejoe100 | December 6, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Our intelligence agencies probably know what you ordered at the McDonald’s drive thru yesterday, but have “no recent intel” on Bin Laden? There’s a reason. He’s like the main character in Weekend at Bernie’s– dead, but that won’t stop everyone from having a good scare time at his expense. Not even the FBI claimed Bin Laden was involved in 9/11, although I seem to recall ABC News did.
Posted by: h5mind | December 6, 2009, 1:59 am 1:59 am
When Bush began ramping up for the Iraq invasion, he led us to believe that Bin Laden was probably dead. But then he came back alive and was always ready to dispatch a timely tape to fan our fear and bolster the Bush/Cheney/Rove national security fear index. Someday we may learn the real story behind Bin Laden. We do know that by intention or incompetence Bush let him escape from Tora Bora.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | December 6, 2009, 4:10 am 4:10 am
I guess we really don’t know… but Gates might have a great idea where OBL is, and is just saying they have no clue. I’d think if the CIA was going to play head games, we’d never ever know it.
Posted by: Troy Street | December 6, 2009, 7:13 am 7:13 am
It’s been obvious from the get go, no-one ever really wanted to catch Bin Laden how else could we continue with the war on terror? When I read these blogs and the excuses to continue these phony wars I realize how many stupid people there are in the US. Bin Laden is probably hagging out in a Presidential Palace in Saudi. Soon the Cheney and members of the PNAC will have their way, what a bunch of creeps. They won’t stop until it’s WW3 and Obama is no better than Bush.
Posted by: Louie | December 6, 2009, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Maybe if the CIA would put a high enough price on Ben Ladin’s head they would get some intel.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | Dec 6, 2009 1:07:34 AM
—————-
The ‘intel’ we would get would be of the same quality of a whole lot of intel we have gotten from Afghanis in the past.
It would be a lie so we would bomb the home/compound of a member of a tribe/family that the person giving us the intel hates.
OR
It would be a lie so we would be distracted and waste time/money/resources or lives of our troops so the person giving us the intel could do something we should know about.
OR
It would be a lie because the person giving us just wants the money.
Posted by: malcat | December 6, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am
If people were held accountable in government, Obama would be out already. Lie machine. I guess he didn’t take history in school. You let the generals run the war. Maybe he took islamic history. he is a moron and a sad, sad, sad commander in chief.
Posted by: Nobama | December 6, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am
> ….. yeah, it is you that is stupid. Have you completely overlooked the fact that the Bush Admin. had 8 years in office? For a long time Bush wouldn’t even say his name publically. Take your meds!!
Posted by: Robert | December 6, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
As a Republican Secretary Robert gates originally worked for Bush.
With Obama wanting to be bipartisan, Secretary Robert Gates is working with/or against Obama, in the same position.
The lesson to learn is:
Democrats go out of their way to work with Republicans.
Republicans go out of their way to work Against Democrats.
Republicans Never work well with others.
I say, Kick the Republican bumb Gates out and begin to have Independents replace the Republicans.
At least Independents also believe in being bipartisan and try to work well with others.
Posted by: Angie | December 6, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
don’t really believe they wanted to get bin laden, don’t recall ever hearing Bush even mentioning his name.
Posted by: Oliver Stone | December 6, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am
kept hearing about these “safe havens”, that I thought were safe places for terrorists to be and off limits for the U.S. to attack. Unreal…. nobody ever questions this stuff…
Posted by: Oliver Stone | December 6, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Yeah, the last good itelligence Gates had on Osama was either he died at Tora Bora or he died of kidney failure…….
in 2004.
Why don’t you people just call him by his real name………….
Goldstien
Almost time for Two Minutes Hate.
Posted by: Tom | December 6, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
With Obama wanting to be bipartisan, Secretary Robert Gates is working with/or against Obama, in the same position.
——-
Angie,
Bipartisanship is a two-way street. Successful bipartisanship REQIRES compromise and give and take.
President Obama says he wants to be bipartison. I really don’t believe him. Look at everything passed or even debated by Congress since he was sworn in.
President Obama’s idea of bipartisonship is: Everyone has to agree with me.
If the Republican representatives do not go along with what he and the Democrats in Congress want to do, they are ‘naysayers’, ‘obstructionists’, ‘anti-Americans, and various other negative names.
There is NO true attempt at compromise. It’s all bully-tactics and rule by might of numbers. That is not bipartisonship.
Having scolded President Obama and the Democrats, let me turn my attention to the Republican members of Congress. Work with the President and Democrats! You don’t have to agree with everything they want, but at least try to negotiate in good faith whether they want to or not.
To President Obama, Democrats, Republicans and Independents. We American citizens are tired of the bikering and posturing. You were elected to SERVE America and her citizens. DO IT!
Posted by: malcat | December 6, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
I think I was wrong before, Osama has moved to China, had an ethnic-Chinese makeover, and is now making drywall for export.
Posted by: Huh | December 6, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Two questions for ABC News.
Didn’t you guys report that according to widespread agreement among US intelligence that there are only about a hundred AlQaeda left in Afganistan? I guess a thousand troops for each one is necessary.
WHY does the FBI Most Wanted poster for Bin Laden not state that he is wanted for conspiracy to commit the 9/11 attacks? They must know something we don’t.
Seriously, many of us would like to know the truth even if it is as ugly as we think it is.
Posted by: Tom | December 6, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Doesn’t anyone remember Benazir Bhutto? who shortly before her own assassination reported to western journalists that Osama bin Laden had DIED and that was before 2007…..just keep on being scared very very scared…it helps keep us ratcheted up for endless war…
Posted by: Madams12f | December 6, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
I think I was wrong before, Osama has moved to China, had an ethnic-Chinese makeover, and is now making drywall for export.
———
Either that or all those cheap toys made with dangerous parts and high-lead content toys to kill our youngest generation.
Posted by: malcat | December 6, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Didn’t anyone notice we haven’t seen video – or pictures really – of Osama bin Laden since just a couple of months before the Boxing Day Tsunami?
Indonesia isn’t that far from Afghanistan and Pakistan. There’s plenty of other small Muslim settlements in the many islands between the Indian and Pacific oceans too. Lots of people washed away without a trace that day.
Just a thought.
Posted by: Post Deluvian | December 6, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
I just watched Gates on one of the liberal propaganda efforts on an alphabet network. The man lies poorly. Why is he still here? I saw John McCain trying to prop up Obama’s surge-while-retreating show, reaching across the aisle to Al Queda & the Taliban. I am ashamed and sick of the whole lot in Washington, D.C.. Let me know when the revolution starts.
Posted by: twolaneflash | December 6, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
malcat-good point. It is Christmas time after all!
Posted by: Huh | December 6, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
> c’mon CIA, it’s time to celebrate the holidays.. isn’t it about time another video/audio surfaced?
Posted by: tinytim | December 6, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
A bogeyman doesn’t have to be real, he just has to be believable to be effective. What an effective yarn this OBL drama has been!
Posted by: ernieson | December 6, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
malcat-good point. It is Christmas time after all!
Posted by: malcat | December 6, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
LOL… I have to laugh at all the “right-whiners” complaining about Obama’s “strategy”…of course, they would complain also if Obama did or didn’t pick his nose in public…. hehehe…. doesn’t matter, they’d still complain.
Let’s not forget the wonderful Bush strategy for capturing OBL in Afghanistan, and why we’re still there after 7 years. This pretty much sums up the Bush’s strategy:
(1) Iraq has a land mass of 169,000 square miles, and Bush had 170,000 troops there… 1 service member per square mile.
(2)Afghanistan has a land mass of 252,000 square miles, and Bush maintained a troop ceiling there of 38,000 for 7 years…… LOL … a “great” capture OBL strategy.
At least now, we’re back focused on where 9-11 started, we’re putting the right amount of troops there, and we actually do have a strategy.
So quit your whining! Remember, the reason Obama is in office now is because YOU re-elected Bush… LOL.
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | December 6, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Give it a rest. We’ve spent years chasing a ghost. Afghanistan was Russia’s Vietnam. At full power the Ruskies spent 13 years in Afghanistan and left with their tails between their legs. Who ran them out, you ask. U.S. trained and supplied, Bin Laden. U.S. involvementin Afghanistan will end in tragedy. Obama better get a room at Dover AFB.
Posted by: Ron | December 6, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
How can this level of incompetence continue in this government? Obama, Gates, Clinton, etc. are totally clueless about War and what it takes to win. Our troops should come home immediately when the Commander in Chief and the administration is this irresponsible and incompetent. MacArthur, Patton, George Washington, etc. are turning in their grave seeing the nation they heloped buiold destroy itself with clueless people at the helm.
Posted by: Rolf Goehler | December 6, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
That stumped tooth, dirty dog John Kerry knows where he is. Read the senate report and it will tell you.
Posted by: Jeff Russ | December 6, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Our troops should come home immediately when the Commander in Chief and the administration is this irresponsible and incompetent. MacArthur, Patton, George Washington, etc. are turning in their grave seeing the nation they heloped buiold destroy itself with clueless people at the helm.
———
Rolf, I’m not a big fan of President Obama, but let’s give President Obama a chance. Maybe he will listen to his military advisors. Maybe, just maybe his plans will work.
My patience is pretty low though. I’m tired of seeing our troops come home with massive brain injuries and missing limbs. I’m extremely saddened to see those flag-draped coffins.
President Bush made mistakes, but he’s gone. It’s up to this President to be the Commander-in-Chief and I believe he deserves the chance to prove he can do what is right for our country and our troops.
Posted by: malcat | December 6, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
he had plastic surgery and is now living ing the white house.
Posted by: john | December 6, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
The Pakistani ISI, intel, knows where Osama Bin Laden and where Jalaluddin Haqqani, Battle Commander of all Taliban operations. If the U.S. is going to disrupt, dismantle and degrade Al Qaeda/Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan we will have to bomb the tribal areas between the two countries. Diplomacy, among sucide bombers who say “God willing, we will annihilate you until we die” is no longer possible. The forbidden zone needs to be in the cross hairs of our military. We can not depend on the reliability of the Pakistan Army and NATO forces are now needed to defeat the terrorists to prevent them from acquiring weapons of mass destruction. We can not spend the next generations tax money without resolution of the Al Qaeda/Taliban threat.
Posted by: Dallasman | December 6, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Aah, there are dialysis machines all over the place in Tora Bora. You can’t go down a goat path without stumbling over one.
Posted by: nick dixon | December 6, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
It’s “canons of intelligence tradecraft” not “cannons.” A cannon is a gun. A canon is an axiom or principle.
Posted by: Lance | December 6, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Bin Ladin is DEAD DEAD DEAD..George Bush got him….. Thanks George
Posted by: dean | December 6, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
He,s living in the white house
Posted by: dean | December 6, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
I honestly do not think Bin Laden will ever be captured. For one, he is a figurehead only, a symbol, and not terribly important in himself at this point. For another, IF he were captured, that would mean a trial or at least some public forum in which he could TALK, and that, I suspect, would prove terribly damaging to certain interests in the US who were complicit, perhaps even BEHIND the 9/11 events. He will either be killed (assuming he is still alive, which is dubious) or never found. I have known this from the get-go. The last thing desired is a full airing of actual facts re’ his relationship with the CIA/US powers that be. And to focus on him at this point is a red herring. Leave him to die in a cave somewhere if he has not already. Focus on the agents we CAN FIND and fight every day.
Posted by: raven | December 6, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Thank you, George. I understand that you simply had ran out of time, but it was nice not to hear about ‘Sunday Funnies’ right before the obituaries. If it was not just because of time, but a wise compromise… It’s good enough.
Posted by: felix yaroshevsky | December 6, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Thank you, George! Even that you didnt do your usual “Next – Sunday Funnies” only to show the obituaries becouse of the fact that you had ran out of time. Still – it was nice.
Posted by: felix yaroshevsky | December 6, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
I do not know why the Bush administration ferried all the members of the Bin Laden family out of our country after Sept. 11. I do not know why Bush did not surround and capture Bin Laden when he was within our grasp at Tora Bora. I do not know why this villian he started out saying he “wanted dead or alive” was put on the backburner and allowed to set up base in the tribal areas of Pakistan where he still hangs out almost a decade after 9/11. But there is so much about the Bush/Cheney years that does not make sense yet.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | December 6, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
No news? He’s dead! Only fools and liars keep perpetuating the existence of the much needed boogeyman!
Benazir Bhutto was assassinated only two weeks after she told the world in a BBC interview that OBL was and has been dead for quite a while!
Now it’s time to go after the real criminals.
A good start would be- Bush,Condie,Rumsfeld,Rove,Kristol.Bremer and Cheney!
Posted by: emkay | December 6, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I do not know why the Bush administration ferried all the members of the Bin Laden family out of our country after Sept. 11.
———-
I think I do and if you actually thought about it, what I am going to say would make perfect sense.
1. OBL had been disowned by his family many years ago, and he had disowned them.
2. The bin Laden family had no knowledge or participation in the attacks of 9/11.
3. The bin Laden family is wealthy and has considerable influence in the Saudi govenment and business world.
4. America needs the goodwill of the Saudi ruling family and the government of that country as a counter-balance against the more extremist countries in the area.
5. Whether we like it or not, the USA is dependent on mid-eastern oil; Saudi Arabia sits on the OPEC board and has often saved our butts from price-gouging and extreme manipulation of oil production.
6. All the above was known by President Bush, all Congressional representatives, and other high-level diplomatic and military personnel charged with keeping our country not only safe from physical attack but also harmful manipulation of world finances.
7. Result, the members of the bin Laden family in the US on 9/11/2001 were quickly removed from our borders to protect them from any form of retribution resulting from the attacks planned and implemented by OBL.
Posted by: malcat | December 6, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
It’s been less than a week and Obama’s already weak excuse for a strategy in Afghanistan has been duck walked backward by several years, termed by Clinton and Gates a process toward ‘transition ‘ only, and only a’conditionally based’ pull-out, plus scripted ‘demands’ to get into an expansion of the war to Pakistan — what will 6 months bring?
The reason that Obama, Clinton and Gates are all having extreme difficulty defending this BS is all the same:
The key to understanding the impossibility of Obama’s dilemma is that he is trying to defend a Global Empire with American blood and treasure.
Obviously Obama will not articulate this reality, and thus his plan entails seminal incongruities, which are seen by a few, but sensed by the wider audience of Americans.
Obama has tried to gloss over these incongruities by using the historical techniques of Empires’ salesmen — he has engendered fear by characterizing the enemy as a “spreading cancer”, or ‘falling dominos’ like communism — but the real spreading cancer is the Global Empire that hired him to guilefully defend it with American blood and treasure.
Historically, the salesmanship of Empire has always been based on promising the domestic population that they will share the ‘spoils of war’, or the ‘safety of winning’, in return for fighting, and paying, for imperialist adventures.
But Obama, although a consummate salesman, will encounter increasing resistance from the American populus because of the unique incongruities of fighting and paying for a Global Empire with domestic dollars and dead, and without any benefits actually accruing to the American public.
Obama’s dilemma in selling and defending the escalation of war first in Afghanistan, and then in Central Asia and the greater Middle East, is the same as his dilemma regarding his escalating defense of the very same Global Empire on Wall Street —- that all the benefits are privatized and all the costs are socialized.
Alan M
Sanford, Maine
Posted by: A;lan MacDonald | December 6, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
I’d check that ranch down in Crawford. He’s probably living in the guest house.
Posted by: gymratusa | December 6, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
“Where is bin Laden?” I figured Obama and team would have gotten him by now.
Posted by: ajax | December 6, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Arnaud de Borchgrave insists that Bin Laden is alive, but has not shared his source with us.
Posted by: PeterD | December 6, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
It is a height of sheer absurdity for US government to claim that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in to the hands of Islamic extremists if Taliban insurgency wins in Afghanistan when Pakistan’s current democratic as well as previous military governments are sheltering and protecting the leaders of that very Taliban Afghan insurgency in Quetta, the provincial capital of Baluchistan.
General McChrystal clearly laid out in his assessment to President Obama that:
1. Most insurgent fighters in Afghanistan are directed by a small number of Afghan senior leaders based in Pakistan that work through an alternative political infrastructure in Afghanistan.
2. The Quetta Shura Taliban (QST) based in Quetta, the provincial capital of Baluchistan, is the No. 1 threat to US/NATO mission in Afghanistan. At the operational level, the Quetta Shura conducts a formal campaign review each winter, after which Mullah Mohammed Omar (Afghan Taliban Chief) announces his guidance and intent for the coming year.
3. Afghanistan’s insurgency is clearly supported from Pakistan. Senior leaders of the major Afghan insurgent groups (QST, HQN and HiG) are based in Pakistan, are linked with al Qaeda and other violent extremist groups, and are reportedly aided by some elements of Pakistan’s lSI. Al Qaeda and associated movements (AQAM) based in Pakistan channel foreign fighters, suicide bombers, and technical assistance into Afghanistan, and offer ideological motivation, training, and financial support.
Pakistan is sheltering and protecting these Afghan insurgent groups to reestablish its writ in Afghanistan as and when US leaves.
As Times of London reported on 9/28/09, Pakistani government started to relocate Afghan Taliban’s QST leaders to Karachi to protect them from impending US drone attacks on Quetta after the submittal of General McChrystal’s assessment.
With an ally like Pakistan, US has NO chance of winning in Afghanistan no matter how much military efforts or aid US pours there.
Posted by: simple simon | December 6, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
First, oh thankyou thankyou thankyou, The_Mick. Best comment I read in years. I needed that laugh…Give us more.
I am glad to see other intelligent people believe that OBL is dead, and is being kept alive (figuratively speaking natch) as a bogeyman. Fear is such a great motivator, right? And lets governements raise larger armies, and get the sheeple to accept wasting egregiously huge sums for war, but not protesting no such huge sums for health & peace & fighting global warming etc. The good guys, that is.
All this scheming is sickening beyond words – words acceptable in a social setting.
To change the subject: I am sorely puzzled by Long’s comment about “keeping up the lies about him being dead.” Very muddled statement – I can’t grasp the real/exact meaning,. Please write more precisely, OK? And elucidate that weird comment. Thankyou.
As to us being unable to find a turbaned 6″4″ guy while being able to read a license plate from 200 miles away. Well, maybe we can’t find him ’cause he took his turban off.
Posted by: VdV | December 6, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Now that US occupies AFPAK, it can prepare for occupation of Iran. To get dumb Americans support the forthcoming war on Iran, OBL has to be spotted in Tehran or Bushehr. Soon the world headlines will flash the news of intercepts of OBL messages coming out of Iran, and the fat-assed Americans will be ready with their support for the war. War is America’s lifeline.
Posted by: Fiercely AntiAmerican | December 6, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Are we that dumb to believe that there even is an AL Qaeda???
I mean think about it, Al Qaeda supposedly on 9/11/2001 was HERE in the US on OUR VERY SOIL. They hit the PENTAGON!
And miraculously on 9/12/2001 THEY VANISHED, never to be seen again in 8 years.
In Iraq with all of our military, high tech equipment we can’t stop CAR bombs.
Yet here in America, we CAN’T STOP CRIME but we somehow through our wonderful defense system we stop AL QAEDA???
Are you KIDDING ME?
Wake up America!
Posted by: David | December 6, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Of course, Osama bin Laden is dead. While he may have survived Tora Bora, maybe, his dependence on dialysis was grave at that time. A couple of years ago, video went out to the world showing an Osama bin Laden with no gray in his beard. International experts studied the images carefully and concluded that this was a look-a-like. There was an earthquake in northwestern Pakistan in 2005 that killed over 70,000 and injured an additional 200,000. There were those at that time who said that Osama bin Laden had died in the aftermath. So al Qaeda wants us to think that Osama lives and most everybody plays right along with it despite the reality. Why?
Posted by: Pat Williams | December 6, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
I believe that the tall man is dead. Killed in the terrible earthquakes that rocked Afghanistan and Pakistan a number of years ago. Since that time no video footage of him bashing the US has been seen, only audio tapes that some officials say isn’t his voice.
Posted by: democratic | December 6, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Ask Mulla Krekar
Posted by: Hans - E Christensen | December 7, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Cfiman,
How many parts of your body are anatomical?
The ignorance in this room is astounding. Any wonder Bush stayed president as long as he did, and that even the dumbed-down health care plan is shouted down by a bunch of banjo-pickers hired for peanuts by the insurance companies?
Posted by: Yamama bin Laden | December 7, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am
There’s a good chance that OBL might be found in a WHERE’S WALDO book.
Posted by: ernieson | December 7, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I know some people are confused about issues of facts, but OBL was never on the payroll of the CIA. Osama even stated this himself. On the other hand the mujahideen got money from the CIA.
The idea that the CIA creating OBL is a myth.
Posted by: jonny | December 7, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I know some people are confused about issues of facts, but OBL was never on the payroll of the CIA. Osama even stated this himself. On the other hand the mujahideen got money from the CIA.
The idea that the CIA creating OBL is a myth.
Posted by: jonny | December 7, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Where is Obamas Intel?? Thought he had all the answers on finding this guy during his campain? Guess once your in you can forget what you promised.
Posted by: Jim Rod | December 7, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
The lefty nutjobs accused Bush of waiting until the election to kill bib laden to gain vote.
So now, what is baracks excuse?
Posted by: Reality2009 | December 7, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
I think Juan Williams is right! About Humans being responsible for too much carbon in the world!
We should stop making ourselves carbon Based. 300 million Americans are Breathing in that wonderful clean oxygen and emitting that nasty carbon dioxide. I propose another Democratic Government Law. Everyone should stop breathing for at least 2 hours a day, also while we are at it, the Dems should tax anyone who breaths more than the law allows and emits all that carbon. That NEW TAX should make the Democrats jump for joy. They are SO GOOD at Taxing everyone and everything! Question: If you own an Elephant, should they Tax You Double?? And how would you train one to stop breathing 2 hours a day?? Boy these Democratic laws are sure hard to cope with.
Posted by: Frank Dioguardi | December 7, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Forget about bin Laden. Even if he is captured/obliterated, whatever, he will become a martyr, and even more of a cult figure than he is now.
Concentrate on the “findable” tentacles of Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and obliterate them. Then, if bin Laden is finally tracked down, he will become an irrelevancy – a footnote to history.
Posted by: Spud Lite | December 7, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
To heck with Bin Laden, where’s Prez. O’Babble ? This guy moves around so much I’m beginning to wonder if he’s got a thing going like Tiger Woods.
Posted by: Ron | December 7, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
He is already DEAD folks and the enemy wants us to believe he is still alive.
Posted by: Roscoe | December 7, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
“Osama Bin Laden, Dead or Alive?” by David Ray Griffin is a must read.
Keeping him alive serves propaganda purposes, Griffin contends, and he meticulously, if not entirely convincingly, dissects each message, of bin Laden’s messages, from December 2001 to October 2008, to reveal how these communications have been conveniently timed and constructed to suit the needs of the Bush administration (particularly when it came to linking al-Qaeda to Iraq), going so far as to suggest they were fabricated with voice morphing technology.
Posted by: brian | December 7, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
1. I wouldn’t expect SECDEF to admit intel on Bin Laden even if he did know more. This would defeat the purpose of covert intelligence.
2. I don’t think it’s “startling” that we don’t know Bn Laden’s whereabouts; the only thing mind-boggling is why we’re still in Afghanistan where our admitted foe is not now and has not been in about 8 years.
3. What’s the real story here? What is our responsibility to rebuilding Afghanistan now that we’ve invaded it? Yes, we could bail out without guilt in that Afghanistan caused the flap in the 1st place by refusing to give up Bin Laden. However, this would overlook the fact that the current administration (whatever the recent election discrepancies) is NOT the former Talibani-led regime who did the dirty deed, and a vacuum of power could lead to a hotbed of terrorist activities and reprisals against US-sympathizers similar to the fall of Saigon. I am for pull-out, in as humane as way as possible, yet as quickly as possible. No, I’m not a dove. Yes, if we knew Bin Laden’s whereabouts, I would be for sending in forces to take him out (regardless of borders).
Posted by: Rod | December 7, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
To TealTripod55:
Conspiracy facts abounded during the Reagan “Iran-Contra” years; read on:
“In March 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive 166,…[which] authorize[d] stepped-up covert military aid to the mujahideen, and it made clear that the secret Afghan war had a new goal: to defeat Soviet troops in Afghanistan through covert action and encourage a Soviet withdrawal. The new covert U.S. assistance began with a dramatic increase in arms supplies — a steady rise to 65,000 tons annually by 1987, … as well as a “ceaseless stream” of CIA and Pentagon specialists who traveled to the secret headquarters of Pakistan’s ISI on the main road near Rawalpindi, Pakistan. There the CIA specialists met with Pakistani intelligence officers to help plan operations for the Afghan rebels.4″
-Chossudosky, 2001 Sep 21,
Posted by: Rod | December 7, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
OBL is known to be dead. He was also an asset. There is no such thing as US intelligence. I know this first hand; it is my work. Wars are waged for reasons having nothing to do with the propaganda the State Department crafts (and does so poorly). Only Americans bother to defend America–only Americans are so foolish.
Posted by: halamed | December 8, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Bin Laden was killed shortly after the initial invasions of Afghanistan. When he was supposedly trapped in the mountains, and the US “took it’s eye off the ball”. His death was the reason for the pullback, therefore giving “deniablity” to the US forces as to his whereabouts. His image was kept alive in order to pursue a “profitable” long war and to have a boogyman that can make “appearances” when needed.
That’s why there has been no “intelligence” on Bin Laden for years, because there is none to be had. His fate is already known.
Posted by: Judas | December 8, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am
Bin Laden is dead, has been for years. If he were still alive, Al Queda would have released a new video with him holding a recent newspaper and yapping about how the infidel would burn … blah, blah, blah.
He’s dead. There is no reason to believe otherwise. That’s why there’s no intel.
Posted by: Phil | December 8, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
The taliban have been seeing him. Why not ask a few where he is. Maybe that is too simple. OR Just suppose our people really know where he is. If that is true the whole war is a scam to deplete our resources.
Posted by: Alan | December 10, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Here is another good possibility. President Obama should ask some of his relatives with connections over there if they know anything on his whereabouts. OR Why make this so politically correct just send in a few lawyers like the ones digging up information on Sarah. They have excellent fact finding skills that could be put to some practical use.
Posted by: Alan | December 10, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Gee, I thought he was serving as one of the Czars in the Obama administration
Posted by: Willie12345 | December 11, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Now let me get this straight. The CIA self admittedly stated that Bin Laden was at Tora Bora and could have been captured with more Rangers inserted. Gen. Tommy Franks decided against this and Bin Laden escaped. So now, people want to blame this administration? Has the ability to objectively think through issues disappeared entirely from American discourse?
Posted by: Terry | December 13, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm