McCain and Krugman Assail Proposed Obama Spending Cut As Broken Promise
"Another broken Obama campaign promise," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., (@SenJohnMcCain) tweeted this morning, providing a link to a Real Clear Politics story and video indicating that "No less than four times during the presidential debates did President Obama actively campaign against an across the board spending freeze."
McCain in fact proposed a spending freeze not dissimilar to the one President Obama's advisers rolled out yesterday, saying he would exempt the Veterans Administration, Pentagon, and entitlements from the freeze.
But there is a key difference. Senior administration officials say the freeze they're proposing wouldn't be an across the board freeze on every program — some spending would go up, other programs and agencies would be frozen or experience cuts. It would be an overall freeze on the totality of the discretionary non-security budgets from 2011 through 2013.
In the first presidential debate, then-Sen. Obama said in response to Sen. McCain's freeze proposal, "the problem with a spending freeze is you're using a hatchet where you need a scalpel. There are some programs that are very important that are currently underfunded."
In the second debate he said an "across-the-board freeze" is "an example of an unfair burden-sharing. That's using a hatchet to cut the federal budget. I want to use a scalpel so people who need help are getting help and those of us like myself and Senator McCain who don't need help aren't getting it. That's how we make sure that everybody is willing to make a few sacrifices."
The White House will argue their proposal is a scalpel.
From the other side of the political spectrum, Nobel Prize laureate Paul Krugman blogs that the proposed freeze is "appalling on every level," "bad long-run fiscal policy, shifting attention away from the essential need to reform health care and focusing on small change instead," and "a betrayal of everything Obama’s supporters thought they were working for. Just like that, Obama has embraced and validated the Republican world-view — and more specifically, he has embraced the policy ideas of the man he defeated in 2008."
- jpt

Email
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Romney Makes His Case to Conservatives at CPAC
Well, given Obama’s repeated railing against spending freezes and mockery of John McCain for suggesting such an idea during the campaign in 2008 (both videos making their rounds online today), isn’t it a broken promise?
Posted by: Good Lt. | January 26, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Obama/Dems went on a wild spending spree, looking out for his friends with stimulus money and thousands of earmarks. He used our money to make backdoor deals, buy votes, travel the world.
And now that people are fed up, now that he is tanking in the polls and got blown away in Massachusetts Obama has decided to put a freeze on spending.
How convenient.
He probably had that strategy planned all along.
Posted by: larry | January 26, 2010, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Yes, Obama you promised to spend our country into oblivion. Why do you care now? Krugman is a Keynesian nobel prize fool that believes government spending is the cure all. This may be true as long as foreign creditors run us a continuous line of credit or we inflate, but are these really a good idea considering our current debt burden. The future does look bleak. I hope Ron Paul runs again. McCain wants to bomb Muslims. This could result in another 911. Kill them, they kill us….
Posted by: Ben | January 26, 2010, 10:22 am 10:22 am
“Krugman is a Keynesian nobel prize fool that believes government spending is the cure all.”
He’ll say what you want, just send the money, like Enron did.
Posted by: At the Pump | January 26, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Obamas hidden agenda: going after your retirement portfolio….Anti-shareholder..
another way to go after the middle class
check out newsbusters.org and cramers report
Posted by: another crisis, another photo-op | January 26, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Obama, Dude, if you’ve lost Paul Krugman…..then you’ve lost your base.
Posted by: Spending Czar | January 26, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am
FY2007 Republican Congress $2.72 trillion
FY2008 Democratic Congress $2.98 trillion
FY2009 Democratic Congress $3.1 trillion
FY2010 Democratic Congress $3.6 trillion
Posted by: For The Record | January 26, 2010, 11:09 am 11:09 am
And another false attack on the president from McCain…
Posted by: matt | January 26, 2010, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Krugman has been totally incompetent on every theory he has ever had. He actually thinks that running up the credit card to amounts that cannot be paid back is a good thing. He is actively trying to destroy the economy of the US and cause the dollar to be worthless.
Posted by: Brian | January 26, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
“Well, given Obama’s repeated railing against spending freezes and mockery of John McCain for suggesting such an idea during the campaign in 2008 (both videos making their rounds online today), isn’t it a broken promise?”
Good Lt. | Jan 26, 2010 10:06:52 AM
No. For a few obvious reasons:
1. This is not the same across the board spending freeze as McCain proposed.
2. In the last budget, a number of underfunded programs were funded and a number of useless programs (including ones Bush wanted to cut but was thwarted by Congress, like the F-22) were cut, making a freeze now palatable.
After 8 years under a Bush veto threat (not to mention 6 years in the minority, and 2 with Republicans setting new records for filibusters) of being unable to fund their constituent’s highest priorities, it is not surprising the budget deficit increased. The same thing happens whenever party power changes. (And look at the deficit, since tax cuts made on the national debt ARE spending – as Republicans now accept since they refer to all the tax breaks in the stimulus as “spending”.)
Posted by: jhw539 | January 26, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am
So he did like the Mcain idea just a little bit.
Posted by: cv | January 26, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am
McCain is playing politics and trying to grab the spotlight just as he always does….He is nothing more than a grand-stander who has accomplished little of meaning in his time in the senate..
Posted by: indy_voter | January 26, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am
McCain is playing politics and trying to grab the spotlight just as he always does….He is nothing more than a grand-stander who has accomplished little of meaning in his time in the senate..
Posted by: indy_voter | Jan 26, 2010 11:44:13 AM
And the poor people of Arizona don’t even get the benefits of pork projects!
He’s not my favorite and he seems to reach across the aisle on the wrong issues and behind closed doors – like immigration – but he must have done some good. Perhaps some of the good things he’s done do not make the headlines?
Posted by: For The Record | January 26, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am
What ANOTHER broken promise… Let me check… Wall St. bailouts A-ok! Assistance to the American people, let alone people who bothered to vote for him, nada… I really don’t think he even wants another term.
Posted by: jafo | January 26, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Here’s something Krugman (but not McCain) might agree with —
David Brooks’ column in today’s NYT conflates current American populism as “punishing the elites” — whereas it’s really the same as colonial American populism in ‘exposing and confronting EMPIRE’ with democracy.
Here’s how Obama could win a second term, or four like FDR (if it were still legal) and be as popular as George Washington for winning the Revolution against the British Empire, if he has the guts to level with the American people (and coincidentally save our democracy):
Here’s the single, seminal, and underlying ‘cause’ of all these problematic ‘issues’ that Obama has to level with the American people about to restore his credibility, and coincidentally save our democracy: —- its not health care, nor the economy, nor the wars, nor the hundred other distractive symptomatic ‘identity issues’ that are ALL caused by the exact same hidden metastasizing tumor of cancer.
It begins with an ‘E’, but “its not the Economy stupid” —- it’s EMPIRE.
In his “State of the (democratic) Union’ he should forcefully point out that today we’re almost totally controlled by a previously well hidden corporatist EMPIRE — now made more visible by the supreme court’s treason of literally handing over our country to the Empire overtly.
While this problem can not be solved by any quick legislative or other means, that he will actually ‘lead’ and solve this (and all our other problems caused by Empire) and he will do it by moving to the Green (independent) Party (which does not accept corrupting corporate Empire money), and then Obama should challenge all those he is addressing in Congress, who have the guts to represent us (and the U.S.) to follow him and shun the hopelessly corrupted and ‘bought’ Dem/Rep single corporate Empire’s two-faced phony party.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Posted by: Alan MacDonald | January 26, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Assistance to the American people, let alone people who bothered to vote for him, nada…
jafo | Jan 26, 2010 11:59:15 AM
What? Did you miss the stimulus entirely? About a third of it was direct tax breaks going right into people’s pockets. I guess because he didn’t grandstand and mail out a bunch of $300 checks like Bush liked to do the ‘low information’ demographic missed it.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 26, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Spending is a runaway train, and has to reined in.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 26, 2010, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“About a third of it was direct tax breaks going right into people’s pockets”
Don’t worry, the money will be gotten back through Excise Taxes.
Posted by: Page 19 | January 26, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Obama derided McCain for the idea of a spending freeze. Obama derided Hillary for a mandate on health insurance. Obama derided McCain for proposing a tax on insurance.
See a pattern?
Posted by: Axey | January 26, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
In his “State of the (democratic) Union’ he should forcefully point out that today we’re almost totally controlled by a previously well hidden corporatist EMPIRE
Posted by: Lloyd B | January 26, 2010, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Excuse me, but all Senator McCain is doing is reminding the American voters that were suckered by Obama’s mindless blabbering about whatever sounded good that he is an empty suit that will do anything when it’s popular.
Obama may be a good guy, a great dad, and a fantastic basketball player, but he is an awful leader. It’s no wonder that he’s never lead or accomplished anything and never wrote an actual article while being the first African American editor of the Harvard Law Review. He’s just not a leader folks. He’s a blank screen that Axelrod is projecting whatever message he thinks will sell. A leader does not have “pivots” and campaign themes once he is in office. He does not go on Oprah or the Tonight show. He shows respect and leads. He realizes he is a President and not an actor in a movie.
Posted by: Aaron | January 26, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Wow, a $500 bribe, compared to the BILLIONS the bankers and Wall St. got. Thanks for the “Chump Change” Barack. My mistake. Thanks for setting me staight. O’bomba sychophants.
Jeez what do you guys have against the brain dead Bushites, you sound just like them.
You think corruption is partisan? Really, how many lobbyists does Obama have in his administration… There is no help for you people, just like there wasn’t for the Bush Kool-Aid drinkers either.
Don’t worry, the American people have bigger worries than the inflated ego of an incompetent President and his personality cult of followers.
If Obama was what he said he was, he wouldn’t have kept Bushites, Bernanke, Gates and NY Fed bailout designer Geithner. You can hate Bush and the Republicans all you want, but your boy Obama seems to value them for some odd reason. And he is going down because of it.
The people voted for “Change” after eight years of Bush II, not another four years and a total up to this point of twelve with the special interests and the bankers getting taxpayer dollars, and the taxpayers left with the debt in return.
Posted by: jafo | January 26, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Election Day is barely nine months away. Can’t you just feel the excitement on the cuckoo left?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | January 26, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
You all must not have anything else to do but complain about any and everything! What solutions do you all have to offer? God says to “pray for those in authority so that we may live a quiet peaceable life.” I have never seen so much disrepect for our presidents before. President Obama is not responsible for the condition our country is in. We all are responsible. Other countries do not have to attack us, we do enough of it ourselves. A house divided against itself will not stand. What do you think about a country divided against itself? Grow up!!!!
Posted by: Jwana22 | January 26, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Where’s Krugman been? Haven’t we all been “changed” by all this “prosperity”?
But wait, there is hope. Earned income tax refunds are enroute and there is bound to be lots of new cell phones and flat screens sold the next month ot two.
Posted by: david | January 26, 2010, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Dear McCain..
Read the POTUS’s lips ‘He Won’.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | January 26, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
He’s a mess. These liberals endorsed an unqualified candidate and now they’re shocked–shocked!–that he is incompetent.
Furthermore, he has no core values. He spent his youth playing both sides, not having a clear identity, and he’s still doing that now. He’s not a leader. He’s a follower.
Democrats should find somebody else to run in 2010.
Posted by: Bubbles | January 26, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Overall, 47% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance. Fifty-three percent (53%) disapprove.
Presidential Approval Index (Strongly approve subtracted by strongly dissaprove)-14. Rassmussen Reports.
Wake Up! He has NO mandate ANYMORE…
Posted by: jafo | January 26, 2010, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I really hope that some poll is not pulling this racial divide and America’d divide out of the last President’s old jeans along with some old white lint in there. This WHITE person who voted “GWB” the only republican I ever voted for because he started dropping many bombs on the people who had me running for my life on Feb 26, 1993 as I stood in the cafeteria of “3 WORLD TRADE CENTER”, the Visita Intern’l Hotel nestled so snugly below the towers. Then the only republican I ever voted for dropped the ball bigtime. Sure, Saddam had a “price” ha, ha on his daddy’s head, so take off Hussiens head and then get back to business. I doubt any other president has made rich people in this country richer. Let’s let President Obama fix the mess that GWB left for him before we start taking him out of office. One of those messes….leaving the largest financial institutions and auto makers in ruin. GWB had two eyes and both of them were probably on the blind trust holding his pot of gold. Its totally bewildering that these companies needed such help without anybody realizing it. “Sure lets jam a 3/4 Trillion dollar bill through just before I leave office”, wont matter to me”, (“GWB”). I was going to school for accounting, damn glad I started working for a sound company and bartending at least everyone there was honest!!. I like Elisabeth on the View, she adds controversy. You gotta have someone on the side of the blind, and yeah, its absolutelly imperative that she be good looking or she would have been gone a long time ago. She absolutely does have some fashion sense cant argue with that. Wanna put some of that earning in the US Budget that YOUR presidents made worse than ever?!
Posted by: Rick | January 27, 2010, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Just and added note for the view. Its nice to have a moderator that doesn’t monopolize the topics but does, and gratefully does, speak her mind and I do have the same “View” as she does on many of her opinions. I wouldn’t dare say to her, “don’t ever change” ’cause it wouldn’t matter, and it shouldn’t!! Its nice to meet someone at a “Hole in the Wall” and have it mean more than any of these sad topics! “Here’s to you Whoopi!!” God bless ya!!
Posted by: Rick | January 27, 2010, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Mc Cain can’t decide what hat to wear. One time he criticizes the president for not cutting spending…now he is cutting spending and Mc Cain at first says I am glad he decided to do this and then turns around later and criticizes. Someone must have gotten to him…you know it is not a good thing to be a free thinker in the republican party…you must speak the party line for if not…you are in TROUBLE. Thank God Colin Powell is a free thinker and they don’t like him either. I think everyone had to sign a pact to stick to the party rhetoric no matter what or else if you run, robo calls will be made telling voters not to vote for you like Palin did in N.Y.
Posted by: talmag | January 27, 2010, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm