Jan 20, 2010 5:00pm

Bonus Plan: Tax ‘Em

With Wall Street rolling out its bonus packages, most Americans have a simple response: Tax the big ones.

A broad majority in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, 73 percent, favors a direct, special tax on corporate bonuses over $1 million. That’s far more than the support for two other notions – taxing banks themselves, or limiting the size of bonuses they can pay in the first place.

A direct tax on big bonuses has the advantage of majority support across the partisan spectrum, albeit to different degrees: Sixty-two percent of  Republicans and 69 percent of independent are in favor, rising to 85 percent of Democrats.

Behind these views is plenty of public ire, with financial institutions continuing to take the brunt of the blame for the condition of the national economy. Seventy-nine percent of Americans blame the downturn on “banks and other financial institutions, for taking unnecessary risks,” with nearly six in 10 saying they deserve a “great deal” of the blame. That’s essentially the same as last fall – no slack in sight.

Still, despite the financial industry’s unpopularity, plenty of people remain loath to involve the government in private enterprise. Americans divide evenly, 50-49 percent, on whether the government should try to limit the size of bonuses banks that have repaid their TARP loans can give to their top employees. There are big partisan and ideological differences here.

Also there’s nearly an even split, 48-44 percent, on the notion of a tax on stock transactions by banks, again with sharp partisan breaks – 65 percent of Democrats in favor, falling to 35 percent among Republicans. (The administration’s actual tax plan, announced after the poll began, turned out to be on bank liabilities, not stock transactions.)

The nation’s big banks have been rolling out their employee bonus packages this week – hardly endearing figures to the rest of the public, given the nation’s continued broad economic distress. The ABC News consumer confidence index is down sharply the past two weeks to very near its record low. And our ABC/Post poll finds the economy still far and away rated as the nation’s biggest problem, with only 35 percent saying President Obama’s policies have improved it.

That sort of discontent, as yesterday’s Senate election in Massachusetts indicated, can be a powerful political force.

Click here for the questions.

User Comments

Apply incremental taxes to the “****heads” — the greater the bonus, the larger the tax.

Posted by: lou k. | January 20, 2010, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

i’ve got an idea. since it was our money that bailed them out, why not give us a bonus. they still have their jobs!

Posted by: buddylea | January 20, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I’ve got a suggestion: Study the Constitutional Law concerning “Bill of Attainder”. Regardless of how “tainted” you guys think these CEO’s are due to TARP receipt, paying big bonuses, or any other perceived “crime” you believe they committed, they cannot be isolated and specially taxed. You can’t pick and choose which parts of the constitution you want to enforce. Here is a quick definition of the concept of Article 1, Sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution: “A bill of attainder, is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial and includes any legislative act which takes away the life, liberty or property of a particular named or easily ascertainable person or group of persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct which deserves punishment.” That’s it. Period. We can not tax these banker CEO’s just because you and the congress thinks that their receipt of bonuses deserves punishment. Are you guys not the same liberals that demanded that the Bush administration stop intercepting cell phone calls from suspected terrorist because it violated the Constitutional “right to privacy”? Now you want to pick another section of the Constitution to trample on? Some integrity you are showing.

Posted by: ncpilot10 | January 21, 2010, 5:45 am 5:45 am

Why not tax the auto industry also,did we not bail them out? If the banks are paying us back and with interest,and some have already paid us back who would be affected,what message are we sending? Profit is Evil? Why would the government care how much the Bonuses are when we are being paid back? The Government was as responsible for this mess as the banks were,how about we tax the retirement benefits of all the politicans who were in office for the past 16 years and retired on the Tax Payers back? Say an additional 10%.

Posted by: stormerF2 | January 21, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Anyone who knows about bonuses realizes that companies typically gross them up so that the bonus amounts aren’t diminished by taxes. And guess who pays all that extra money to pay the taxes for the recipients?

Posted by: Publius | January 25, 2010, 12:49 am 12:49 am

There seems to be a lynch mob mentality regarding the treatment of the rich. The constiution is suppose to protect the minority from a blood thirsty majority.

Posted by: Tillyerkt | January 27, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am

This taxing shoulda started like a year ago!!

Posted by: ODD | January 28, 2010, 12:37 am 12:37 am

NAFTA created this problem. Tariffs created a level playing field between countries. That is were our jobs went that is why we are in the state we are in

Posted by: chris | January 29, 2010, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Don’t single out the bankers for higher marginal tax rates, it’s too complex, difficult and legally tenuous. Instead, raise the rates on high income (+$250K/year) people in general to something approaching the Reagan years-surely the Republicans should agree with that!

Posted by: Joe Sortais | January 30, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.