Brown: ‘Humbled’ by White House Talk, But Doesn’t Rule Out 2012 Run

He’s pro choice and pro civil unions. He will NEVER get the GOP nod to run as POTUS unless he flip-flops on these 2 issues……..

Is that all it takes to be a Republican Presidential candidate? Just win one time? Or, is it the centerfold? And, the most amazing thing is this guy is really considering it. Republicans do have a way of deluding themselves.

Republicans needs more liberals like him to bring the party in 21st century. He is a democratic in republican platform. Good for the nation. Backwards should go backward.

If Brown is pro choice and wins the presidency both parties will have been corrupted.

Oh, please.

To Sara: Memory is short! Isn’t that exactly what Barack Obama did??? Illinois senate directly to the White House, hmmm. Maybe before your time, but check the history for John F.Kennedy’s path to the same residence, via looks and money.

Photos and a pickup truck is all that is needed for some Reps to think he is White House ready. Shoot some think Palin is Presidential material so Brown must be a genius to them.

I miss Stephanopoulos. He would hold people to answering the question. His talents are wasted on GMA. Jake Tapper did a very good job last week and would be a great replacement to George. Walters is a lightweight and did not pressure Scott Brown to answer the questions. He seems to be the new Ken Doll.

So All the Obama haters said he didn’t have any experience being a one term Senator but this guy does? Wow what a bunch of silly hypocrites

This is not newsworthy, it is gossip. We already a presidency of style over substance already. How’s that been working out for the American people. Let’s devote more headline space to the balloon boy’s jailed parents!

This country has embraced any one who authors couple of books and is able to market it the good and has a little backing from greedy people as a Presidential Leadership material. Policies and beliefs are only the Springboard for success. When one dives and comes up successful that will be his driving fuel for rest of the term. Politics is a game of hypocrites for any party. Just as a Leader is considered for a particular flock which can add or drop its constituents without hesitation.

And for you posters commenting on how Obama is not much better than this guy, you obviously missed the Baltimore Q and A. Obama made every repub member look like a idiotic school kid and countered every one of their lying ‘talking points’ with facts and substance. To think this centerfold dude has half the intelligence as Obama is just like saying Palin does. Sad commentary on you and the repub party that you don’t even know the difference.

This whole trend of leading with inexperience is troubling. Barack Obama has turned out to be a disastrous learn on the job president, do we really want to go out and get another like Palin or Brown?
I suppose it’s a Catch-22, you either get a professional politician who may wreck the national economy or some tin-horn who all but certainly will. This is the curse of two party politics.

An idea of potential interest and value …. Barbara Walters is a charming “entertainer”. She isn’t, however, and effective news broadcast moderator.

Obama didn’t have any experience! Scott Brown for President!!! Allow me to talk out of both sides of my mouth.

We Will Find out much more about him! Just Wait And See! He Looks like he is hiding something!

I just heard him make an incorrect statement about Government employees. I work for the DOD and the private contractor employees make MORE than me. I Do Not Make DOUBLE what they make. Get your facts straight Mr. Brown…

Hey, I know a guy that knows a guy, that knows a guy, that knows a guy that once voted Republican. Surely, this qualifies him to run for office in 2012. Yeah, he also wants to be President too. Got my vote. Desperate people do desperate things. Hey, why not Joe the Plumber, he’s qualified too.

CH – There’s this pesky little thing called an IQ. Bush, not so much. Obama, much. Palin, not so much. You getting this?

Scott Brown is a total EMPTY SUIT. Normally I would ask how he OR ANYONE could look into the camera and tell me and the rest of the united states public that Sarah Palin has the capacity to be president, but that would be to question his obvious superficial character. He is indeed a good look’n gent who has a shot at political fame and (just like the good-look’n Palin) can end up with a great book-deal and a possible commentator slot, or even his own right-wing television show. This is all about himself. Smile for the camera Scotty, you’re on!

Wow. Not even a chance to see what kind of Senator he will be? I guess the republicans have traded their values for electability?

Barbra Walters rocks!!!!

“As soon as Republicans find a candidate that makes a splash they want them to run for President. E.g. Sarah Palin. Amazingly desperate and dumb.”
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. NO, that is the DEMOCRAT story and their “Obama is God” thing

I think the will of the people is being grossly underestimated by the Dems & Repubs.

Keep Baba Wawa off of This Week!

Experience or no experience, the President is doing a better, much better, job than the previous president. I think the current administration is doing a good job…considering the mess they started with. Please don’t forget how bad Bush was!

OMAMA will beeat anything or anyone thrown at him by the Republicans Republicans have been campaigning since they lost. Come election time their lies and propaganda will be exposed- Party of lies, deception, wars Sarah Palin and Rush Limbo will never deceive and plunder the country again- GO OBAMA.

Brown is liberals worse nightmare. And even after 50 years Barbara Walters is a rank amateur.

If anything is likely to destroy America it is surely the stupidity of the American voter. There is very little known about Scott Brown yet there are people already considering voting him into the White House ?! This is the empty-headedness that gave us Carter and Obama. Come on folks, THINK.

This sound really stupid, so stupid I wonder if it was made up.
“has many Republicans hoping he’ll make a White House bid.”
Name them.

I guess some need reminding that the dupe in the White House now was only in the senate two years. At least Brown is not a leftist dictator!

I voted for him. And, at the moment, I would like to see him as the GOP candidate. He almost lost my interest when he said something positive about Ms. Palin during an interview. But I guess he had to. I could also see a ticket of Mitt Romney and Scott Brown.

Did we learn anything? Yes. The American people are so shallow that they will elect someone who is good looking and articulate with no experience. Plus Brown is military which puts him miles ahead of the current idiot occupying the White House.
The American people aren’t going to elect Newt, Mitt, or any of the current crop. Face the facts so we don’t lose in 2012.

Hey morons, get a clue. The only person talking about him for president is Barbara Walters. Where are all these “desperate Republicans” you keep referring to? I don’t see ANYONE rumoring him for president except her (and now, you). Barbara Walters speaks, and the mindless left takes the bait like the sheep that they are.

Well all Mr. Brown has to do is spend 151 days as a US Senator and he’ll have more experience than the current occupier.
He should go for it. The election of Obama clearly proved that ones experience and track record means nothing anymore.

Can’t believe you liberals! Obama was more experienced?

“All fluff and no substance; what is it about these people repubs love?” This has to be a delusional “Obamaite”… What do you think you voted into the oval office? “All fluff, no substance” should have been Obama’s campaign slogan. At least then he would have been honest!

What can Brown undo for you?

it is amazing that you democrats on here are so surprised that someone with so little experience could want to be president. HELLO? Obama was in the Senate for 100 days, and before that, where was he? The Illinois State legislature. And give it a rest with style over substance, I can not tell if you are talking about Obama or not??

Perhaps then a Romney-Brown ticket?

I notice all the lib/dems attacking the man even though he’s hands down more qualified than your messiah was when he ran for his current position. Scott Brown is a RINO, we don’t need another Arnold, look what he didn’t accomplish in CA. Scott Brown took the same path as JFK, and John Kerry. Lib/Dems are doing everything that you can to destroy this country with your gimme, gimme, gimme politics. Try going out and earning something before you redistribute it.

For crying out loud. Who does he think he is–a more experienced Obama? It would be ridiculous for him to run. After all, he could win like that silly Barack Hussein Obama and, perhaps, do a terrible job running the country like Obama. Nah. It would be hard to be as bad as Obama has proven to be. Just a thought. HB

A state senator who only spends a few years in the US Senate before running for President and winning. Never happen.

Easy folks…this is just the media trying to get the attention off the lack of positive movement by the current admin. Perhaps Brown would make a good VP candidate b/c of his charisma, but the GOP has much better candidates for the Oval Office (not Palin either).

And who is this Obama person again? Is he a puppet of jewish extremists like Soros (real name schwartz – when he figured out that the name “onasis” was already taken)? What country’s army did his chief of staff serve in during the gulf war? His chief political strategist is jewish? Most of the key positions in the Federal Reserve are occupied by jews? Did the Israeli newspaper Maariv really report that “The US no longer has a government of goyim…” Sept. 7, 1994?

Obama ran for President after being Senator for just 2 years….Brown would have been Senator for 2 years if he ran in 2012 as well. Though I’d actually argue that Brown has more experience serving out country as a state Senator (as did Obama), town Selectman (like a mayor), town Accessor, and had several REAL jobs working for various companies, earning paychecks and paying bills like the average American.
Obama went from student to law professor to lawyer/community organizer to Senator getting real estate deals from Rezko and getting in tight with the Chicago politician scene…

Amazing how Scott Brown is being called out by dems for not having experience. New to the Senate? Good looks,and that’s not enough?Sounds familiar doesn’t it?

Why wouldn’t he? Seems to me a young upstart Senator from ILL began running for the White House at almost the same time he entered the Senate. What we really need is experienced people running, not neophites like Obama and Brown.

Brown certainly has more experience in governance than “The One” – - and is a whole lot better looking! If “The One” can run after a few weeks in the Senate, why not a more experienced Senator?

This just shows you how week the current president is, nothing more nothing less.
Who ever comes out of the Republican primaries has a great chance of becoming the next President of the United States.

Are you all serious faulting a newly elected senator for saying he wont rule out running for president. Either you all are having a memory lapse or your just idiots. Look in the mirror.

Although I do not believe he will receive the GOP nomination, I find it ironic that people are critical of someone who has only been in state government considering running for president after getting elected to the Senate. Sound familiar to me.

Right now it is the left leaning media outlets that are pushing this notion of Senator Brown running in 2012. To the people living in glass houses; Funny, how all the “Obamites” are now opining how inexperienced Senator Brown is, and should disqualify him from seeking higher office. Where was that sentiment when our current president was barely sworn in as senator when he hit the campaign trail, but of course he did take his position seriously enough to vote “present” 90% of the time he was there. If there are people excited over the prospect over a Brown run in 2012, it is the canary in the coal mine as to just how dissatisfied most of America is at our present direction. I voted for Senator Brown in the belief that he will be different and actually live up to his campaign promises,to do what is right for the people of Massachusetts AND America.

Hey you xxxxxx liberals, we are having to live with your inexperienced community organizer, at least we can think about our “obama lite”!!

“Never served in the Senate yet…state government is different than federal, and He’s going to put his Good Looks forward to be President?”
The experience sound familiar? Minus the good looks part (as our current president looks like a 6 week dead alfred e. newman) it is the same story as Obama. At least this time when they say “good looking” that part will actually be true.

don’t you just love the people here bashing repubs for talking about brown for president when they are responsible for the election of the totally inexperienced boob we now have in the WH

very good

Haven’t we tried this experiment already? I thought we already elected a flashy and inexperienced senator to the presidency? How is that working out for us? So glad we bypassed an experienced senator who so many Democrats always said they would support if the Republicans ever nominated him.

Barbara Walter’s asked the question… not the GOP.
He’s not considering it. He answered the question the way anyone would answer it.

Ok, so I don’t think he is ready for a presidential run… but neither was Obama – he is a truly scary clueless wonder. I’d vote for Scott, but would prefer to see someone who’s been around longer. I’ve disagreed with Newt on a few things lately, but he could certainly be one of the smartest and experienced people the GOP could offer up.

@SearamblerOne
Reference: Barack Obama

It’s not the Republicans who are pushing this guy for Pres – it’s the media. A pro-choice Republican vs a pro-choice Democrat in 2012. Oh, how perfect!

We already have one amateur in the White House (Obama) and see where that’s gotten us. Brown is also a neophyte. Let’s not jump our guns here folks!

So how much experience did President Obama have before he ran for the White House?

by 2012 he’ll have more experience than Barack Husein Obama had. and he beat Hillary Clinton, right?

So Scott Brown will be the next Obama, the US will never learn electing unproven folks leads to disaster look at the white house right now the wheels are coming off the cart as we speak and we are encouraging a guy to run for president who hasn’t even started his Senator job sort of like a Nobel Peace Prize winner who advocates everything but peace (Obama)

What ever happened to the good ol’ days when you actually had to achieve something before running for President?? Oh and for all of you commentators who are talking as if this is purely a Republican problem… just look at who is currently in the Whitehouse. Barack Obama is the ultimate example of someone whose style and charisma catapulted him into a position of authority for which he had little to no experience with whatsoever. By the time 2012 roles around, Brown will have had about as much experience as BO.. not much.
So quit the hyprocrisy.

Already the Left tosses out empty character attacks, playing their typical Saul Alinsky game. But this populist movement will not be stopped. The anger at Washington D.C. is intense, and the Left can toss out vacuous charges and insults at each figure who emerges as a leader, but this won’t help them at all. Because there is no shortage of others waiting in the wings, and even if the smear Brown, he is merely the messenger.
Here’s the bitter truth for the Left. Either the Democrats get their house in order, and end their obsession with huge deficits and intrusive government, or Brown (and/or the many others like him) will be calling the shots in the very near future.

You idiots! Obama had about the same experience and he won. Brown’s chances of being president are huge. The American people were dumb enough to elect Obama. And they are dumb enough to elect Brown. All you need is a Law degree and be good looking. Hell with experience!

It is truly unbelievable to hear the gall of ANY comment being made by you LIBERAL FREAKS out there.
We are 3 still years away from a presidential election and ONE THING is for certain—ANY CHOICE ON THE PART OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WILL BE BETTER THAN THE MARXISTS, AMERICA-HATER that presently resides in the White house.
OBAMA IS AN UNMITIGATED DISASTER (A TRUE ‘MAN-CHILD’!
What has he done beside SPEND MONEY THAT THE COUNTRY DOESN’T HAVE AND MAKE THIS COUNTRY LESS SAFE WITH HIS STANCE ON TERRORISM AND HIS ILLOGICAL, INEPT TREATMENT OF TRUE ENEMY COMBATANTS!?
Go ahead you LIBERAL FREAKS–answer that one!!!!!!!!

@SearamblerOne…”He is a democratic in republican platform. Good for the nation.”
It should be written: “He is a Democrat in republican platform. Good for the nation.”
Democratic refers to the process!

With Obama in office anything is
possible!

Did you notice who asked the question? Hint, it was not the GOP. It was Baba Wawa.

By 2012 Brown will have served in the US Senate longer than Obama when he ran.

Let’s see, a heretofore unknown and unremarkable state senator, elected to the U.S Senate after replacing a senator of the opposite party, who within the span of his first term in office decides to run for president of the United States.
You’re right, that could never happen…
What is particularly amusing is reading all of these Democratic posters decrying and ridiculing the possibility as if is 1) irresponsible or 2) just plain silly.

Question – where in this story does it report that Republicanbs want this guy to run for President?
Answer – nowhere, makling all of these comments (and attacks against Republicans) unsubstantiated.
I just love reading the standard partisan comments on any blog, regardless of what the story is really about (in this case, someone NOT saying something).
Way to go, bozos.

The far left is so terrified after losing that election in MA, that they can’t stop attempting to demean and vilify Scott Brown. Face it, Brown never said he was considering a run for the whitehouse, the reporter attempted to put those words in his mouth.
If this is how angsty your lot are now, I’d suggest you get some serious mental health care now, as otherwise you simply will not be able to deal with what’s going to happen in the mid-terms. ;) BTW, I am a former liberal democrat, now an independent, and I’m working to end the democrat majority, and consign the corruptocrats to the rubbish bin of history.

Excuse me but I don’t think a republican version of Obama is a great choice for a presidential candidate. He hasn’t even been sworn it yet and we have know idea what the hell kind senator he will be much less a president!

While I do not think he has enough experience, I would take a 30 year military guy over a community organizer any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Sempre Fidelis

“As soon as Republicans find a candidate that makes a splash they want them to run for President. E.g. Sarah Palin. Amazingly desperate and dumb.” —–Only from a hippocrite demoncrat would these words echo…..Sounds amazingly like obama to me!!!!!! Go Scott Brown, end the liberal agenda!!!!!

While I think Scot Brown is very personable and seems to have a lot of knowledge, I do feel that he has not had enough experience to be President. It is too soon for another Messiah. We are still dealing with the wreckage of the current one. Waiting 6 years to run would burnish his credentials.

Sounds good. I agree whith him. gochristian shoes

Searambler, what do you mean as soon as someone makes a splash, the GOP wants to run them for President? Then you give Sarah Palin as an example. Palin never ran for President and, hello!?! , we’re not even close to an election year. Before McCain put her on the ticket, I doubt you would even know who she was. You want to talk about irony, you guys ran a guy who was a senator for less than one year because he speaks well. That’s called irony, stupid. On another note: thanks for ruining America.

abortion isnt really a presidential issue- what a lame reason to vote/not vote for someone

He never said he would run for president. Listen to the clip again.

If he runs, be careful. Let’s not repeat 2008 by electing another Johnny-Come-Lately.

Doesn’t he know you need two years in the senate before starting to run for president?

anyone, even a random name in a phone book, is better than Obama.

Wow.
The level of insanity is staggering! On so many levels!
First the facts: As so many folks have pointed out, no Republican has asked Scott Brown to run for President. Walters asked Brown if he would run and he laughed it off as the incredibly stupid question it was. The only thing stupider than Walters’ question was ABC’s spin: “BROWN REFUSES TO RULE OUT RUN!” Not quite a “have you quit beating your wife” moment, but biased and shock-mongering enough to make the National Enquirer blush.
Next, the knee-jerk anti-GOP commenters can’t be bothered to actually, I don’t know, WATCH the video and exercise critical thought, but instead immediately parrot the supremely biased reporting of the monumentally stupid question, and we end up with people bashing the GOP for something THEY NEVER DID!
And the part that actually pushes the issue from the absurd to surreal, the issue is that Scott Brown is unqualified for the job because he has no experience! The man’s elected career is roughly equivalent to that of the current President, and if you count his tenure as a Wrentham selectman, even longer! It may not be a sterlnig resume for the next President of the United States, but it matches up pretty well with the current one.
Ah, only in America can a massively biased news organization twist a supremely idiotic loaded question and get such a vitriolic response from so vociferously self-conflicted an audience.
Pass the popcorn, 2010 is going to be a heck of a ride…

RE: Is that all it takes to be a Republican Presidential candidate? Just win one time?
That’s all it took for B.O.!

FYI–Chris Matthews started that rumor on Jan.19th, before Coakley conceded.
I doubt that Palin or Brown would seek
the nomination, especially after the non-experienced Obama. Of course, both of these individuals have far more
experience than Obama.

Ok Easy does it….now lets not get carried away here. Why don’t we see how well he does first before we start calling for his presidencey. If memory serves me correctly Arnold Swachzenneger, Sarah Palin and Barack Obama were all hyped to the the moon. and look how they all turned out. Look the Republicans can have their guns and their freedom. Obama can keep the change….Meanwhile I’m going to wait and see how well Scott Brown before I start calling for his presidency

Good looking outsider serving less than a full term as senator before runnning for Pres. Where have I heard this song before?

i think we tried a one term senator and look at the hot water we are in …

Some of you liberal morons take the cake. You have the most inexperience person without any substance in the White House NOW and you have the nerve to complain about Scott Brown being without substance. Give me a frickin’ break! If Brown runs as president you cannot complain that he had only spent 150 days in the Senate and the only political experience he has had prior to the US Senate is that he was a state senator. (Sounds a lot like that fool Obama.)
The difference between “Empty Suit” and Brown is that Brown’s politics and beliefs are closer to the mainstream of America.
You are about to lose your precious majority this year and in 2012 you will see “Empty Suit” go back to Chicago, where he should have never left.
Scott Brown is not necessarily pro-choice, btw.
And what is up with the “pro-civil unions” thing? He is not pro gay marriage, if that’s what you mean. I think most Americans prefer a gay couple have civil unions than to declaring their unions as a “marriage”. Don’t get civil unions and marriage mixed up!
As a libertarian I would rather government get out of the marriage game all together and return it to the religious sector. The government should only allow people to register/recognize their relationships for practical legal reasons. The government’s job is just to say that the couple came in and wanted to recognize that they are a couple. This is a CIVIL Union.
If the couple wishes to take a further step and have their relationship sanctioned by a religious body, that should be their prerogative. And there they can call it a MARRIAGE.

Well if Barack Obama can win fresh out of preschool with no experience, so can Scott Brown I guess.

You said: “Never served in the Senate yet…state government is different than federal, and He’s going to put his Good Looks forward to be President?”
Uh, that’s Hussein Obama’s profile exactly . . .
Just who was stupid enough to vote for that lying idiot? Will anybody admit now to being duped by the Marxist Savior? Or will they, more probably, just vote for Republicans this next time around . . .

octogalore, while it’s true Brown has more political experience than does President Bush — Brown began his political career when he was elected to be a property assessor in 1992 — your comment that community organizing implies the President didn’t have any experience in politics directly except for such organizing. In fact, President Obama served in the Illinois state legislature and in the U.S. Senate, the latter a bit of an advantage, since it was *national* experience, in contrast to Brown’s longer experience, but experience limited to the local and state levels. On the othe4r hand, Brown does have something else in his biography Obama doesn’t: a military career in the National Guard, in which he is now a lieutenant colonel. That always plays well with a great many voters. But in any case, President Obama’s election to the presidency wasn’t the same as “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.”

The guy who wrote this: Is that all it takes to be a Republican Presidential candidate? Just win one time? Or, is it the centerfold? And, the most amazing thing is this guy is really considering it. Republicans do have a way of deluding themselves.
Are you for real? As appose to how many time our current president won? 0

Why in the world would we consider running a newby like scott brown when we have a truely polished, experienced, clean, professional like mitt Romney who is ready to take over from the disastress Obama.

You are putting the cart before the horse Mr. Brown. Don’t get to big for your britches!

Both creeper and temple62 have it right; another twit with training wheels is not required nor desired – let alone the same being said for another amateurish WH staff and cabinet (where less than 7% have any private sector experience).

The nation has learned the lesson of electing someone with little experience – and Mr. Brown’s pro-abortion statements recently will effectively turn away people who voted for him in this election because they thought he respected the sanctity of life.
He shouldn’t have been so quick to turn on the beliefs of those who just elected him
I for one, would never vote for him again.

LOL. All these comments about the GOP being desperate talking about running a Senator with no experience. The democrats would never think of electing a Senator with no experience to the White House. Would they?

I LOVE how everyone who commented here is ignoring the fact that Obama spent exactly two seconds in the Senate and did NOTHING before running for President. Part of the reason he won was due to his propaganda, good lucks and intense rhetoric. If that’s not fluff, I don’t know what is.
I DO certainly hope that Senator Brown will take some time to get EXPERIENCE before he runs into a higher office. In a few years he might be the right candidate. But ONLY in a few years.

“So All the Obama haters said he didn’t have any experience being a one term Senator but this guy does? Wow what a bunch of silly hypocrites.”
Trust me BP, it is only a tiny minority of Obama haters that want Brown as a presidential candidate.

“All fluff, no substance. What is it about these people repubs just love? ”
Umm… considering you guys voted in Obama you have *ZERO* credibility to criticize superficial attributes in a candidate.

Mr. Brown may want to consider a head deflation in the near future. He won because people are angry, just like Obama won because he’s black. Neither one has some great, definitive message for the country. Moreover, Brown better watch that he doesn’t become, again, like Obama, a political caricature. We’ve had enough of one dimensional hypocrites who believe more in their own press than anything else. Advice to Mr. Brown: shut up and go to work.

wernervonphooey, Keep on watching cartoons and reading cereal boxes for your information.
Scott Brown held elected offices as a Town Assessor, then Town Board of Selectmen, then State House representative in 1998, where he served for 6 years. He won the state senate in 2004 and now US Senator-elect. (BTW, the Dem controlled Legislature intentionally takes their time in seating him, even though they previously sat Dem. Nicky Tzongas in TWO days.)
Prior to all this Scott Brown has served 30 years in the Army National Guard, most recently as Lieutenant Colonel.
Compare this to BHO’s “experience” is a no-brainer to be polite (A joke to be real)? BHO: Community Organizer, 2 Years in US Senate. PERIOD
Before this, who knows? There’s no proof of anything….school, birth, ..nothing.

1) whoever thinks “Republicans” want him to run is an idiot
2) doesn’t it strike anyone that he’s the white Obama except that Republicans will not be as stupid as Democrats and put someone forward who is so unqualified and wrongly positioned on the issues?
3) Sarah Palin was more qualified than Barack Obama. Had he been white, he would never have received the nomination. Had she been a man, she might have received the 2012 nomination. It’s not going to happen. She’s not ready for prime time.
4) This is ABC people. Don’t expect honest or careful reporting about Republicans.

Being pro-choice and pro-civil unions does NOT make him a Democrat — politics is way more than social issues. It makes him an electable Republican in Massachusetts — and possibly elsewhere. The guy does have a history of fiscal conservatism and strong national defense (via his National Guard service.) It’s the economy, stupid! And this guy knows that.

It’s hilarious that people are questioning his experience! And calling him all fluff…isn’t that what Obama’s run was all about? The hypocrisy is thick in here. But that’s to be expected from liberals.

Look Scott, I truly am happy you won a seat in the Senate, but slow down a bit, get in there and do something first before you start thinking you’re ready to be President. This is the reason we are in the mess we’re in now, Obama won a seat in the Senator & because he gave a pretty speech at the Dem convention, people on the left thought he was ready to be Prez. Regardless that Obama is the least qualified person to ever hold the Presidency (It shows daily), Boy did that backfire. So take it easy, show people you can lead without destroying our country, & just maybe you might convince us you are ready…

Wow…all of these folks putting comments on here are saying…he’s not even served a day in the Senate, he’s only got state legislature experience, he’s just a pretty face, that the GOP must really be desperate.
Contrasted with who is President now…the Voted “Present” senator, the no job experience candidate who served less time in the Senate than what Scott Brown could serve, the joke of a leader.
Yeah…you dems really set us straight on this one.

Hey “Pathetic,” the GOP isn’t who is desperate. Read the article, dummy. It’s the press doing all the talking.

Please people. Let’s not make the same idiot mistake that Obama fanatics did. This is the same unvetted mentality that had calls for Joe the Plumber for congress. The presidency, or any political office for that matter, is not a pop culture position. Haven’t we learned that now? Let Brown get in and show us what kind of leader he is.

There isn’t any real movement within the GOP to run this guy for President. That’s a construct of the media.
However,it’s entertaining to see bitter liberals condemning any Republican for thinking about it- noting Obama’s similar congressional history.

It is ridiculous to think he should run for President. Imagine serving in the Senate for less than two years and running for President….Unheard of! The audacity to think he could be elected with so little experience in the Senate and no accomplishments to his name! To think that is all it takes to be President to win just one time.

I like the guy, but give him some time. We’ve seen what happens when the electorate gets captivated by a new face with little if any high level experience. Carter and Obama come to mind.
Veep on a Petraeus ticket? Wow!

“As soon as Republicans find a candidate that makes a splash they want them to run for President”
Isn’t that the definition of Barack Obama? The irony is Obama has set the bar so low for experience, that anyone holding elective office can now be considered a candidate for President.

I agree temple62.

So does this make B. Walters a REpub, cause she asked the Q?—trouble with
U Leftists is U can’t Analyze, U can
only rant

Brown has something good going just be patient and do not say anything about 2012. You know what happened to John Ewards. Let things just fall into place. Don’t be stupid.

I love the liberal comments on here.” Just fluff. The guy has barely served…and so on and so on” God you people are stupid. The reason this country is in the dog box is because that is exactly what you ignorant liberals did when voting in this teleprompter reading clown into power. He is fluff or should I say lint out of my bellybutton He barely served as anything but a community agitator. Your false delusions of his grandeur have really got us in a very big pickle. So think before you start throwing stones. Take a look at the empty suit who needs a teleprompter to read at a middle school and spends your money on Wagyu beef every Wednesday and then run your mouth off.

Whats with all you libs thinking you are so wise? You put up a “community organizer” in 2008 that turned out to be a sham yet you still talk like you’re experts on candidate selection. Obama is throwing the progressive machine under the bus. Look at the loses: NJ, VA, MA. Can you read the writing on the wall? In November we begin taking back our country from the ‘progressive’ tragedy that has done nothing to create jobs.

Scott brown seems to have his feet on the ground. However, why would we republicans consider him when we have a great candidate already. He’s a true top businessman, a true professional. Proved thru business and government positions that he gets things done by using both parties for advice, unlike Obama. He’s got a wonderful family, no problems with who he associates with and thank goodness has lots of experience solving many problems. Go mitt

We don’t need another “Obama”.. Obama was feted by the press and the PR agents a a presidential contender the second he won the chicago election to the senate. Since Obama has an ego larger then the distance from the Sun to Pluto, he of course ran for president and the country is now reaping the rewards of that idiotic process with loss of personal freedoms and soviet style socialism being installed.

Neo-conned once again.

This is the most embarassing interview for BARBARA that I have ever heard. Wow. When did she drop her journalist credentials so blatantly for her left-wing flag? He’s a united states Senator for crying out loud… Barbara, go back for a journalism refresher course. No one everyone’s giving up on news on tv. No credibility. Did you do an Al Franken interview about him stealing the election there too? Wow…

Thank a lot good post!