Jan 7, 2010 9:09am

Does the National Security Scare Put President Obama at Risk?

The White House today will release the unclassified version of the security review examining what went wrong in the case of the Christmas day terror plot. The report, White House national security adviser James Jones told USA Today, will “shock” Americans.


So what does this mean for President Obama and his administration?


We invited Democratic strategist James Carville and Republican strategist Nicole Wallace to weigh in on the debate on “Good Morning America.”


Wallace thinks the president’s slow response to the national security scare is likely to hurt his standing with independents.


“I think in the last three days he has [done enough],” Wallace said. “[But] in the early hours after the failed terror attack he took about six more rounds of golf and a movie with the kids. Now I don’t think we know exactly yet what damage was done in those early days but you never get those moments back and I think that first impression was that he was slow, that his surrogates were out there saying the system worked, and I think those things do irreparable harm.”


Carville, on the other hand, argued that the president was only waiting to get more information before making any statements.


“I think his reaction has been pretty determined and I think it’s been pretty good,” Carville said. “As an air traveler, I’m pretty satisfied with the quickness and the depth of the response.”


Watch our full roundtable here:


User Comments

“Now I don’t think we know exactly yet what damage was done in those early days but you never get those moments back ”
Funny, that wasn’t the Republican position when President Bush spent twice as long continuing his vacation before addressing the shoe bomber incident (which was nearly identical). And the Democrats respected that such national security issues are a bipartisan concern and didn’t risk America by trying to score partisan points.
But then again, when Republicans went to the floors of Congress to protect Bin Laden in the 90′s, condemning Clinton’s “Monica Missile” attacks and demanding he cease his belated attempts to kill Bin Laden and focus on their impeachment charade, it worked out well. Republicans profit enormously from terrorist attacks on America, and by their actions I am starting to think they very definitely know it.
But all that is documented reality, so who wants to talk about that?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 7, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I’m sure others have said this, but I must tell you: You don’t belong in the frivolous, superficial and [insert your adjective here] environment of morning TV.

Posted by: David | January 7, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Yes it is just more fearmongering for the sake of warmongering. We need a seed change in foreign policy, and I was hoping to get it with Obama. Unfortunately he is not really that much different from Bush. These so-called terrorists kill us because we have been messing with them for decades, everything from sanctions to propping up corrupt regimes to outright bomb dropping. Americans should not be surprised with their hatred being directed at us. There will be a lot more of these attacks in the future because we are creating more enemies daily.

Posted by: Huh | January 7, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am

This proves all Americans can aspire to be President and in fact would have done a better job on this specific matter. With the information that was widely disseminated in the public domain shortly after the incident, the average American recognized the gravity of the situation much faster than this Administration did. The President is entitled to his vacation, but it is now clear there are not competent staff in place to address the war on terror.

Posted by: Kevin | January 7, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am

This president hasn’t fixed the banks, hasn’t paid attention to terrorism … because 100% of his attention has been devoted to taking over the health care system, over and against the will of the American people. He is a power-hungry, arrogant man.

Posted by: Gary | January 7, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am

It seems like every time I listen to these Republican Strategist, it sounds like they are reading from a Queue card. heir answers make no sense and are very different from reality. It stuns me that when comparing reponses to terrorism b etween the Obama administration and the Bush administration, Nicole Wallace brings up Katrina and stated that the Preseident Bush did an admirable job. Where was she during the entire Katrina saga? He flew over an entire city while people where dying and went back to washington. At least make a better case when comparing how the two administrations handle Terrorism.

Posted by: William | January 7, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am

This president hasn’t fixed the banks, hasn’t paid attention to terrorism … He is a power-hungry, arrogant man.
Gary | Jan 7, 2010 10:47:17 AM
So who TRIPLED the number of troops in Pakistan? Who approved the “shoot them in the head” negotiations with the Somali hostage takers? Who launched the first attacks on Al Qeada in Yemen a week BEFORE the underwear bomber set foot in an airport? Who has kept in place the successful elements of the military that have kept Iraq off the front page and staggering to its drawn out end? Who has escalated drone assassination attempts against terrorist leadership hiding in Pakistan?
Not Obama, no of course not. Maybe the Easter bunny? Or maybe Cheney is sneaking into the Oval office at night and taking care of these issues?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 7, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am

“So who TRIPLED the number of troops in Pakistan? ”
Oops, that should have been Afghanistan. Although troops have probably more than tripled in Pakistan too just by the replacement of Blackwater mercs with American troops for arming drones, those numbers aren’t documented anywhere.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 7, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am

This administration can’t secure the front door to the White House.

Posted by: bob | January 7, 2010, 11:04 am 11:04 am

OBAMA has really messed up! He is bringing hardcore islamist murderers on American soil, giving them all the lawyers they could ever want and appointing several incompetents to oversee our protection(most notably Janet (Reno Wannabe) Napatilano. Obama looks like a kid lost and wishes his parents would find him but it is to late-the country sees what a misfit he is for a leader(that coupled with his constant lying-like he is going to be transparent). As stupid as Bush was, he is starting to look like a far greater leader than Obama the Ivy League Pinhead!

Posted by: Rockychance | January 7, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am

President O’Babble has wasted no time willfully putting the Amercan people at-risk. The Bush administration had worked out a system to keep our country safe; Bab, as soon as he was immaculated, began taking that system apart. We are all at great and will remain so until Babble is voted out of office.

Posted by: Ron | January 7, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am

“The Bush administration had worked out a system to keep our country safe”
Yep perpetual war with everybody everywhere all the time.

Posted by: Huh | January 7, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Most americans know incompetence starts at the top. When you place people in key positions based on their voting demographic or a favor owed rather than their competency, this is what you get. Fly at your own risk. There is no guarantee that even an obvious terrorist will be kept off your plane.

Posted by: peter | January 7, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am

“There is no guarantee that even an obvious terrorist will be kept off your plane.” True, when they light their underwear on fire, tackle immediately.

Posted by: Huh | January 7, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Regardless how you chalk it up, the GOP welcomes any adversity created regarding the Obama administration. The Obama administration is, at a minimum, as credible as the Bush administration regarding national security. Even the bulk of the Bush administration security officials are stating this on various media outlets. Cheney, Palin and the GOP are political opportunists whose true ambitions revolve around their gathering of power, not national security. Americans have become so tuned into to the selling of fear they buy it as quickly as it is made available.

Posted by: Independent1959 | January 7, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am

I hope something clicks in Obama’s mind. It is time for him to get off his agenda and become a President serving the people that elected him.
No one knows what this guy really intends to do. He has pretty well proven he has lied to everyone while a candidate and now as President, he is ignoring the people, claiming his actions are what people want.

Posted by: James L. | January 7, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am

“No one knows what this guy really intends to do. He has pretty well proven he has lied to everyone while a candidate and now as President, he is ignoring the people, claiming his actions are what people want.”
I disagree. Obama is implementing his main campaign promises: Beef up the war against Al Qaida; healthcare reform; energy indpendence; education priorities (yet to come).
Regarding ‘what the people want’, I am much more in favor of Obama’s agenda than the Bush (or McCain) agenda. No one lied more than GW Bush to the American people. He had experts to guide him (Cheney and Rove).

Posted by: Independent1959 | January 7, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Commenters should keep in mind that just because something you’re doing creates enemies doesn’t mean in and of itself that you should stop doing that thing. Sanctions for example, are done for a reason (generally global security related, see Iran), and whether or not we’re “surprised” by violent feedback doesn’t have any relevance to whether the action was warranted or not.

Posted by: Nick Becker | January 7, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Nick Becker -Sanctions on Iraq during the 90s under Clinton are said to have taken out 1 million Iraqis. Albright even admitted that these deaths were worth it on 60 minutes years ago. I am not willing to stand by my government’s decisions to do these things without speaking out.
“violent feedback doesn’t have any relevance to whether the action was warranted or not.” Yes it does, because my family could be harmed. So to me it does have relevance. Quite frankly I am not too worried, but the chance is there. As a Christian I must speak up against the misguided policies of my government. To me throwing tax dollars after cruel insanity is very relevant, especially when the nation is so fiscally damaged.

Posted by: Huh | January 7, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

“Does the national security scare put President Obama at risk?”
——
I’m assuming that the question is extended to: “of political fallout?”
My answer, as a Republican and citizen that actually thinks would be NO with some stipulations.
We all wish that President Bush had done MORE to improve intelligence gathering and analyis. But he didn’t. We all wish President Bush had done More to improve airport/in-flight security. But he didn’t. He didn’t do enough.
We all wish President Obama had immediately upon taking office placed more emphasis on improving intelligence processes and airport/in-flight security but he didn’t do that. We wish President Obama had begun addressing problems in intelligence gathering after the Fort Hood attack. If he did, it probably wasn’t enough.
President Obama IS working on those issues NOW. I think he’s made a decent start with modifying airport security, reviewing the databases, and deploying more air marshalls.
I say we give him a chance to go from decent start to excellent results.

Posted by: malcat | January 7, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Obama at Risk?
Risk of what?
He has not been in office for a year yet and you’re all writing him off for dead….wake up folks for when the repugs nominate Palin….Obama gets a second term!

Posted by: Kevin | January 7, 2010, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Obama is a one term president. He doesn’t have a clue.

Posted by: CW | January 7, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

>>Does the National Security Scare Put President Obama at Risk?<<
Yes, it puts Obama at risk. And rightly so because he's put America at risk. That 3am phone call has been ringing but nobody is answering. Amateur hour at the white house continues.

Posted by: grannysunni | January 7, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I think National Security was the last thing on Obama’s mind and it shows. He spent six minutes on his speech after three days of waiting and went back to his golf game like nothing had happened. All the bowing and groveling he did over in the foreign countries making apologies for the USA made us look weak to our enemies. I think Al-Qaeda was just waiting until Bush and Cheney got out of office to start up again and Obama fit right into their plan by being weak on foreign policy. Bush and Cheney had learned their lesson and was tough on terrorism.

Posted by: TXAR.55 | January 7, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

So, can anyone show me the part where Stephanopoulos immediately responded to Nicole Wallace’s assertion that Obama was “slow” (4 days) to repsond to the Christmas Day incident by pointing out that the vacationing George W. Bush took 6 days to respond to the virtually identical Richard Reid shoe bombing incident?
Oh wait – that would be from that novel about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to conservative misinformation… You know, fiction!

Posted by: DaveNolanAudio | January 7, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Stupid republicans…

Posted by: Democrat | January 7, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Its amazing you have to bring up Bush everytime Obama screws up. We are in the NOW! Quit going back to Bush everytime Obama screws it up. You arent giving any facts just, you are just trying to divert the issue to Bush and hope people will forget about Obama. Deal with the fact he is the President and Commander and Chief and has done a horrible job keeping our country safe. People are tired of hearing Bush’s name everytime that Obama fails at something. You all got what you wanted and you cant even defend him without bring up Bush!

Posted by: ted | January 7, 2010, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

OBAMA 4 YEARS AND OUT.

Posted by: Daniel | January 8, 2010, 8:27 am 8:27 am

We had a major terrorist incident under Obama the shooting at the Texas Military base. 13 dead 40plus injured, we lucked out that the bomb failed or else 230 people would be dead, recent news that some of Obama’s recent releasee from Gitmo are now lauching attacks on us seem emblematic of a failed policy.
Obama is a general failure at every policy intiative. Banks remain unregulated, corporate fate cats are still raking the bonuses, jobs efforts failed, healthcare is stillin limbo, and the country is utterally bankrupt.
I was under the impression that no one could be worse than Bush well I was wrong Obama is!! He needs to return to academia he is useless as a leader.

Posted by: Army dad | January 8, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Dear George, You are a Journalist not a Democrat Party apologist. Obama is clueless. I supported Hillary and donated money. I bailed late and voted ffor the GOP. A new one for me. I am independent. But will go to the GOP in November. I do not feel safe. Just wait if Russian Tanks try to roll into another country in eastern Europe. It will take Obama at least a week to have a press conference and Warsaw will fall be for even has a clue.

Posted by: Army dad | January 8, 2010, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Just responding to the Bush perpetual war comment. Well what do you President O is doing. Pakistan, Yeman, Afghanistan, and we are still in Iraq.

Posted by: Army dad | January 8, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

To continually make comparisons between this current adminstration and the previous is a waste of time and typing. The fact that is took President Obama 4 days to address the nation after the Christmas day attempted attack is, unfortunately, just another to add to the list of inadequacies in his ability to deal with his job, his country and the people.

Posted by: JB | January 8, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Oh, George – how you have fallen. How hard is it to shut up the Republican talking points?
Hurt Obama? The only thing that hurts Obama is that he is too intelligent for the majority of voters, and obviously the majority of journalists in the media.
How easy it is to forget the last 8 years when the Republican policy basically drove this country into a ditch. But by all means – vote in Palin in 2012.
At least she’ll be able to say, “I can see that tall, pointy building from my porch.”
As for me? I’ll start looking for somewhere else to live.
Because it does not matter what the President says or does – it is always wrong.
Alan Grayson was correct when he said that if Barack Obama had a BLT sandwich for lunch, the Republicans and their tea party lemmings would outlaw bacon.
The comments from the Republicans, the idiotic behavior of the press, and the stupidity of the people who believe the lies and garbage from the Party of No proves one thing: Our education system in this country is a failure.
Many here have no idea of historic events, have no clue as to how government works.
There should be an IQ test given before people are allowed to vote.

Posted by: Robbie3072 | January 8, 2010, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

My hope is that it will derail Obama and his leftist administration, and take the House with it!
Can anyone believe a congress with the audacity to force an American citizen to purchase anything at all, much less insurance.
What kind of constitutional law professor would sign such a bill if presented to him? Don’t answer that one!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | January 9, 2010, 1:03 am 1:03 am

3 attacks in 6 months enough said.

Posted by: Travis Peebles | January 10, 2010, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Obama is clueless and ineffective. Can I take back my vote for him? He loves to talk but it’s just a bunch of “blah blah blah” that doesn’t mean a single thing. The Democrats in Congress should impeach him and put Biden in his place. Yes, Joe Biden would make a better president than that loser Obama.

Posted by: LA42 | January 15, 2010, 5:51 am 5:51 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.