Jan 25, 2010 7:22am

In State of the Union, President Obama to Push Middle Class Tax Credits

At an event today, President Obama and Vice President Biden, Chair of the White House Task Force on Middle Class Families, will today discuss some items that will appear in the State of the Union address.

The proposals are aimed at helping middle class Americans, and include:

1.      Increasing the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit for middle class families making under $85,000 a year from 20% to 35% of qualifying expenses.  The administration says that almost all eligible families making under $115,000 a year would see a larger credit. Families could claim up to $3,000 in expenses for one child or $6,000 for two children, and the maximum credit for a family with two children making $80,000 a year would increase by $900 from $1,200 to $2,100.  The Obama administration will also provide a $1.6 billion increase in child care funding which it says will help an additional 235,000 children.

2.      Capping student federal loan payments to 10 percent of the student’s income above a basic living allowance. The monthly payment for a single borrower earning $30,000 who owes $20,000 in loans would be $115 a month – as opposed to $228 a month under the standard 10-year repayment plan.

3.      Requiring all employers to give workers an option of automatic workplace direct-deposit IRAs. Currently 78 million working Americans — roughly half the workforce – do not have employer-based retirement plans.  The contributions will be voluntary and matched by the Savers Tax Credit for eligible families. The smallest firms would be exempt.

4.      Expanding tax credits to match retirement savings by expanding and simplifying the Saver’s Credit to match 50 percent of the first $1,000 of contributions by families earning up to $65,000 and providing a partial credit to families earning up to $85,000.

5.      Expanding support for families balancing work with caring for elderly relatives with a $102.5 million Caregiver Initiative adding $52.5 million in funding to Department of Health and Human Services caregiver support programs that provide temporary respite care, counseling, training, and referrals to critical services. The administration says the extra funding will allow nearly 200,000 additional caregivers to be served and 3 million more hours of respite care to be provided. It also adds $50 million to programs that provide transportation help, adult day care, and in-home services, such as aides to help seniors bathe and cook, help which eases the burden for family members and helps seniors stay in their homes.

– jpt

User Comments

Maybe its just me, but it feels like Obama is trying to kill the recession by stoning it to death with m&ms.

Posted by: cindy | January 25, 2010, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Jobs. How does any of this create jobs?

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 25, 2010, 7:44 am 7:44 am

Hey Obama, “spreading the wealth” will never grow the economy.

Posted by: SpoutingHorn | January 25, 2010, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Well don’t we need tax cuts in other areas so that we can afford the tax increases for health care?

Posted by: Jenny | January 25, 2010, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Obama is just another empty suit blowing a lot a hot air.

Posted by: Bandera Scout | January 25, 2010, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Tax Credits? Really? I was laid off on December 15, 2009, nearly a year after the economy was supposed to be addressed and the $1 billion stimulus package was supposed to hold unemployment under 8.5 percent. Yes, I know, the stimulus bill extends the period I can draw unemployment benefits and Congress is working to make sure I have health care coverage even though I am out of work. Well, I don’t want extended unemployment benefits and I don’t want health care from the government, and I definitely don’t want tax credits. I want a job! Maybe the campaign slogan for 2010 should be “It’s the JOBS stupid!”

Posted by: Carl | January 25, 2010, 7:59 am 7:59 am

The goal and intent is good – trying to lift people up – but the execution is damaging. Government entitlements and hand outs are not going to fly with most of America. Luckily, we’re better than that. First, the dependency mentality created is depressing. Makes people feel like losers. Second, everyone has now seen what happens when you get mixed up with the government. If you take a helping hand and somehow are able to achieve success – the government turns you into a “fat cat”. If you remain pathetic, you are deserving.

Posted by: Debra | January 25, 2010, 8:00 am 8:00 am

The student loan plan is very good. A vast majority of young people, i.e., those 30 to 40 have 2 mortgages, i.e., the mortgage on a home & the mortgage on their student loans. Helping the middle class out with student loans is way better than bailing out banks. The student loan borrowers will stimulate the economy with the money that they are not having to repay.

Posted by: CSFurious | January 25, 2010, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Whoopee…everyone is getting a bail out…who’s gonna be next and where’s the money coming from? No wonder this country is so bankrupt and nobody is hiring. I love that the benefits are tax breaks…regretfully since I do NOT have a job I will not be filing. Thanks for nothing, prez. Totally worthless…

Posted by: Gina | January 25, 2010, 8:13 am 8:13 am

How is this any different than the bribes given to Ben Nelson of Nebraska or Mary Landreiu of Loiusiana? He thinks this will dissipate the anger that caused Brown to win in Mass and prevent the Dems from being swept out in 2010 elections?

Posted by: Patrick | January 25, 2010, 8:13 am 8:13 am

When Obama was campaigning on his platform of punishing the rich, I wanted him to define “rich”. Now, I believe the pertinent request should be for him to define “middle class”. I want numbers Mr. President.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Patrick..it’s no different. Obama thinks the key to his success is identifying those constituencies who are abandoning him and bribing them with whatever it is they need.

Posted by: cindy | January 25, 2010, 8:23 am 8:23 am

How does this help with student loans. I have had mine for 12 yrs and this would do nothing to help me. And for those who are making $30k and reducing their payment this would only extend there debt out to 40yrs and be a slave to the government. What a bunch of crap. They need to fix the tax code and stop discriminating against the single taxpayer. Do they not know that 50 percent are single and vote? If they would balance out the tax burden to everyone instead of having a write of for their rich friends and themselves which allow their lazy wives to set at home and get a $20k check from the government each year then we would see jobs and growth in the middle class. It time for a change. Isn’t that What Obama said. But he has done nothing but shore up these crooks

Posted by: bob | January 25, 2010, 8:27 am 8:27 am

How very odd. When Bush sent out checks and gave three tax cuts it was a grand thing.

Posted by: secondlook | January 25, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am

How does this “tax cut” square with Obama’s plan to let the Bush tax cuts expire, resulting in a tax increase?

Posted by: marketing2020 | January 25, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am

The people in Washington will never really go after the rich, they are the rich. The people that pay the freight for all this are the 45-65 yr. old, no children still at home, earning too much for EIC, they don’t have enough deductions to itemize and they don’t fit into any of the other tax credits. No one is paying their mortgage. Flat tax EVERYONE so everyone is paying the same ratio of they income, no loop holes.

Posted by: ron | January 25, 2010, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Jobs. Who creates the jobs? Small business mostly. Why aren’t they creating jobs? Because they can’t get loans. Why? Because the banks are holding onto the money and are afraid to loan it out. It is up to the banks to start the economy going. If you want to yell at somebody – yell at the banks. They are the ones we bailed out and are making billions in risky trading again. Some of them have paid back TARP. Now, where is the money going?

Posted by: Bob | January 25, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am

I was wondering when he would throw a bone out. Tax cuts for targetted groups is exactly why were where we are at now. Why not just make them reasonaable for all and stop this silliness.

Posted by: david | January 25, 2010, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Maybe some businesses aren’t hiring for lack of loans but most aren’t hiring because their businesses are shrinking. Also, there’s plenty of fear for the future of the economy and people in general, including business owners, are simply hanging on to what money they have as opposed to spending and expanding.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am

The Massachusetts Senate race has succeeded in perpetuating the illusion that its about Dems vs. the GOP. When the real battle is Rich vs. Poor and the Rich still control both houses and the Executive Branch like they have for at least a hundred years. Once his book put him in the Millionaires Club, his fellow millionaires were happy to let Obama have at the Presidency; Once rich, nobody seriously wants to tax themselves fairly. They may pay lip service to increasing their own taxes, but ultimately they dig deeper into the pockets of the middle class to pay for their proposals for bigger government.

Posted by: Cspangler | January 25, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am

How about removing the penalties for people with money trapped in 401ks and IRAs! I rather pay the taxes on it now and get it out of the phony baloney markets. I don’t like the idea jobs get exported to third world countries to produce dividends.

Posted by: rightbehind | January 25, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Democrats have done a bangup job creating class warfare-pitting poor against rich. However, if a rich man buys a luxury boat, how many people got paychecks building, marketing and selling that boat. If a rich man buys a huge luxury house, how many jobs were supplied in the building of that house. Class envy has become a national sport but is ultimately deadly to the middle class workers in this country. It need to be put to rest.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am

The Student Loan reduction won’t help because the borrower earning $30,000 who owes $20,000 signed up for a 25 year loan because they couldn’t afford the 10 year loan like the example states. Obama’s plan would just extend the loan out to 40 years, who really wants to pay on a student loan for 40 years???

Posted by: JessicaY | January 25, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Kathy, I am the rich. Though I could argue it’s not as much as some would think. The tax percentages are the lowest in 70 years. The rich have made out something awful under republican rule and to restore some balance isn’t a bad thing. How do I justify saying this? We didn’t get the jobs under Bush. I’d like to see the middle class survive.

Posted by: secondlook | January 25, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am

He cannot afford to issue tax credits. He needs to provide more unemployment, and he needs the tax dollars to do that.
Where he gets the idea, that he can just keep charging, the federal budget, I don’t know.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 25, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Obama doesn’t give nothing without taking something else away from the middle class, this guy is just a snake oil salesman

Posted by: another crisis, another photo-op | January 25, 2010, 10:16 am 10:16 am

How are any of these proposals going to grow the job market? How about a couple words about cutting spending in gov’t. I am tired of hearing about how many more billions are going to be spent to supposedly create jobs. How about freezing or an across the board pay cut for overpaid gov’t workers?

Posted by: skip | January 25, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am

none of that will help a single person . the middle class poor working person will have nothing left after health care reform. take a look at the projected increase in medicare deduction from your check. this hurts any vet, on va tricare, any one on medicare(after working for 30 yrs to get it) and anyone still lucky enough to have an hourly wage job.

Posted by: madmax | January 25, 2010, 10:30 am 10:30 am

be careful of stundent loans. there is a whole industry out there already dedicated to providing classes designed to suck tax money for an education that will not provide employment.

Posted by: madmax | January 25, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am

President Obama is going to use the approached of cutting “deals” which will appease enough voters to keep his agenda going. Will the proposals create new jobs and improve the economy or just rob Peter to pay Paul and kick the problem (jobs & opportunity)down the road?

Posted by: tillyerkt | January 25, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Who would guess that increasing the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit would generate jobs and provide an engine for the economic recovery? Obama is a genius economist in the making. I am sure he will be nominated and awarded the next Nobel prize in economics.

Posted by: H1N1Hysteria | January 25, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am

secondlook, the middle class was mostly an illusion. Let’s face it, for many it was the equity in their homes that enabled them to make up for stagnant wages and live lives that were not reflective of their incomes. (That’s why Republicans and Democrats both were only more than happy to put as many as possible into homes, as quickly as possible and by any means.) Now the roof has been blown off, and we are left with nothing but the ugly truth. Going after the rich is a feel-good, default reaction for those who have no good ideas. Raising taxes and fees on the wealthy is not a jobs program. My sister in law works as a waitress at the Ritz Carlton. She obviously isn’t rich, but believe you me, she is rooting for them every day!

Posted by: cindy | January 25, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I’m so impressed with all the economists and financial experts we have here! Wow! Why aren’t you people in Washington? Obvously the administration needs you!

Posted by: Gerald | January 25, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Until Thursday, confrontation with this corporatist Empire was opaque, disguised, and not likely to come to a head soon —- but then the supreme court’s overreach for the moneyed elitist Empire crossed a ‘bridge too far’, and much like the catalyst of monopoly ‘tea prices’ in Boston Harbor by the British EMPIRE this disguised and occupying Empire in our own land today became an easy target for a Second American Revolution.
The “anger and frustration” will not die down. The crimes of the Empire will not disappear. The storm of populist rage and revolutionary spirits will only grow higher and wider in a general conflagration of the people vs, the Empire, and so, Obama can either let his “arc of history bend” him, or he can get in front of it — if he is really going to do as he what said dozens of times in one speech and “fight for the people” (against this corporatist Empire).
Here’s the deal. We can give Obama a little test of his bona fides (some might say, of his guts). Since the supreme court has presented us with the accelerated call to arms by allowing the economically and politically oppressive Empire to totally dominate all spheres of our lives with its unlimited bribery of all corrupt politicians (of both the existing corporate Parties/Party), Obama can prove his real metal by announcing, in his ‘State of the Union’ that he is changing his party affiliation to Green Independent, since that party will not allow any candidate to accept the new unlimited corrupting bribery of the corporatist Empire — and that he expects all honest Senators and Congressmen to do the same if they are to truly represent the people rather than the corporatist Empire.
Obama can essentially call everyone’s bluff (on the angry right and left) and “call-out’ the corporatist Empire’s supreme court enabled money control of our American democracy for the take-over of the country that it is. He can point out to the frustrated average American people viewing on their TV’s (from both the left and right), and to his Congressional audience (of both Republicans and Democrats who are willing to listen) that since there is no legislative or other means to reverse or wipe-out the supreme court’s ‘sell-out’ of our democracy to the corporatist Empire, that he is willing to solve this unsolvable problem —- along with solving our health care problem, our economic tyranny problem, our imperialist war problems, and all our other common problems that have been created by the cancer of this moneyed elite corporatist Empire upon our country, by voting for democracy against Empire and moving to essentially a new ‘Peoples Party’ in the form of the Green Independent Party, which does not take money from the Empire which oppresses us. [Cheer, cheer, cheer]
Obama can issue a challenge those in Congress who want to “represent the people instead of the corporatist Empire, to meet me in the new ‘Peoples Party’ in November, which the whole country and all honest citizens now will know is the only sign of non-moneyed, non-corrupt, and non-Empire choice — and that we will use only their contributions and public funding to overturn any who stay behind in the Empire’s lair of the corrupted Republican and Democratic Party!”
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine

Posted by: Alan MacDonald | January 25, 2010, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Finally the people who actually work in this country get a break! I dont collect other peoples hard earned money I pay it in the form of taxes! Im sick of the “poor” getting money for having kids instead of those who are enjoying daytime television and collecting free food,housing,medical and a tax refund for having more kids. I would love to get some earned income tax credit for my 3 kids. I make 82k/yr sure does look good on paper too bad we don’t bring close to that home(plus I live in chicago (tax-cago)! I saw a bumper sticker a few months ago read “work harder millions on welfare depend on you” sums it up to a T!

Posted by: finally | January 25, 2010, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Make it simple…GO TO A FLAT TAX…15% on all income, period.That way, they KNOW what they have to spend, and WE don’t have to mess with Form 1040 anymore! Quit playing politics with this!

Posted by: angus | January 25, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am

I call taking my money by force, theft but then I’m just finishing “Atlas Shrugged”. And Alan, what makes you so sure that the Green Party wouldn’t be capable of tyranny? It seems you’re suggesting replacing one type of tyranny with another soley on the fact that you agree with the Green’s platform. Realize that not all of us do.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Child care tax breaks and retirement
savings at work??? How does that help
the people who are looking for jobs?

Posted by: wis134 | January 25, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am

i like tax cuts but honestly these wont create jobs. most of it is for families making less thn 85000 a year. that tax bracket is mostly in the 15% range to begin with and not likely to create a job. can we accelearate the november elections please?

Posted by: catman | January 25, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Where is any mention of job creation?
Why can’t he understand the issues?
Tax breaks are not very effective, if you are not working. People want employment, not health care and tax breaks in 2010. A limited use of “Tax investment credits” would give the economy a shot in the arm. THis one option.
Simply put – No hiring or factory call backs = assured defeat.

Posted by: LDG | January 25, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am

What ever happened to that $325 check that Social Security recipients were supposed to get because there was no S.S. increase this year ?

Posted by: Ron | January 25, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am

So where is he going to get all this money he is not taking in to pay down the deficit? Why is he promoting more for people who make bad choices and have more kids than they can afford? Where are the jobs he promised? why not cut Fereral income taxes across the board?

Posted by: stormerF2 | January 25, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am

obama is truly out of of touch with AMERICA,for being allegedly so smart yet so incompetent.

Posted by: catman | January 25, 2010, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Too little to late. Obama doesn’t care about us, he cares more about seeing terrorist are protected. Keeping Holder who called American a nation of cowards. Protecting his ship of fools that he keeps around him. Someone needs to tell the president that his tooth paste isn’t working.
The only thing Obama has done is lie to the American people. He promised hope, change, openness Etc. He has not kept one promise. The situation in Washington has never been worst thanks to him and Pelosi, Reid and the other democratic losers.
What Obama has shown us is how corrupt Washington is and how to talk out of both sides of your mouth.
Obama has been a big disappointment to many Americans who believed his speeches and voted for him. He betrayed us all. Don’t expect changes you’re not going to get it from Obama.
Obama instead of being one of our greatest presidents with out a major change he will go down as our worst, even worst than Jimmy Carter. But at least Carter the old fool really believed in what he was doing. Obama has let down the country, not to mention every black person in the world by showing no leadership, no presidential skills and the fact that he lied to get elected.

Posted by: a citizen | January 25, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Giving the richest Americans trillion dollar tax cuts while they ship our jobs overseas makes good economic sense.
Giving tax credits to the middle class is class warfare.
Will the pathetic right-wing whining ever end?

Posted by: Skip | January 25, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

finally said “Finally the people who actually work in this country get a break! ” There is nothing on that list that I can take. How about not taxing me as much instead of all of these tax credits? That would be a lot more simple.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 25, 2010, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Paying people more than a business can cover doesn’t make much economic sense. Continuing to allow waste, fraud, theft and abuse of our tax money doesn’t make economic sense, especially while asking for more. I believe that at heart, Americans are a good and generous bunch that are more than willing to take care of the truly needy among us, however, I’m sick of paying “my fair share” and getting kicked in the teeth while doing it.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Criticisms, criticism, criticisms, ingratitude, ingratitude. Hey was Bush much better with no innovative ideas and keeping the country as is with no progress legislatively? Obama is probably 10 years ahead of his time; too bright for the job.. But like the famous Mr. Wilberforce, if he didn’t stick to his guns when parliament and the country opposed the abolition of the slave trade, which after a couple of years of being pushed under the carpet, only got passed following another act that crippled the income of slave owners and discouraged the trade – Obama may think about going sideways to introduce some his innovative legislation as people are just so set in their ways and conservativism is ruling the day!

Posted by: Veronica | January 25, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

How about tackling waste and fraud
in the government? They acknowledge
there is lots of it, but never any
effort to clean it up. They just
go back to the well ( taxpayers)
but the well is dry.

Posted by: wis134 | January 25, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Let’s look at some facts from the real world where fiscal responsibility means the difference between staying in business or being on bankrupt:
1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart every hour of every day.
2. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute!
3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. Patrick’s Day (March 17th) than Target sells all year.
4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target + Sears + Costco + K-Mart combined.
5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people and is the largest private Employer, and most speak English.
6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World.
7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger & Safeway combined, and keep in mind they did this in only 15 years.
8. During this same period, 31 Supermarket Chains sought bankruptcy.
9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world.
10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had five years ago.
11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur at a Wal-Mart store. (Earth’s population is approximately 6.5 Billion.)
12. 90% of all Americans live within 15 miles of a Wal-Mart.
MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to fix the economy and run our Government. Let’s face it; there is no way Wal-Mart would not do a better job than Congress.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | January 25, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Good Morning America’s Tip of the Day-
A better financial future- The key
to financial stability is simple.
Spend less than you make. Create a
budget to live by. Wow, can you forward
that to the US Government ?

Posted by: wis134 | January 25, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

This is something to put a few more dollars in the hands of the middle class who are the real backbone of this economy. We are the people who patronize restaurants, buy cars, buy homes, purchase retail items etc. This is what keeps the restaurants, stores, auto dealerships, hotels, etc. open, creating jobs. We are also the people who put money into the greedy hands of all the wealthy who want to shut us up. FOX News,and all theri puppets should give a little thought to that.

Posted by: parma hts gary | January 25, 2010, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

there is no way Wal-Mart would not do a better job than Congress.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | Jan 25, 2010 12:40:47 PM
Wal Mart puts small employers in many areas out of biz, is superficial and boxy, has low quality crappy stuff and treats its employees like crud.
Sounds exactly like something Republicans and glibertarians would be into.

Posted by: progressive mama | January 25, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

catman: What I see posted here, including you, are individuals who haven’t a clue as to how the world works. What do you mean that tax cuts for those making $85,000 and under won’t create jobs. They are the ones who are most likely to spend it, not hoard it away as the fatcats who raped America have done. Don’t believe me, just look at the recent results by IRS going after tax evaders who moved capital off shore without paying tax since the beginning of the Reagan tax cuts for the wealthy. I’m speanking of the UBS situation. 14,000 tax evaders have turned themselves in rather than face prosecution since the initiative began. Due to tax law changes since Reagan, 66% of all U.S. corporations have paid ZERO INCOME TAX. This President is fighting to change this and most Americans haven’t a clue about what is going on. When the CEO of Aetna Health care took home a paycheck of $24,300,112.00 in 2008 alone, and moved most of it offshore without paying tax, then cries poor about health care reform affecting his bottom line, give me a break. All of you ultra right wing idiots need to wake up. The fight shouldn’t be about Democrat or Republican, but about helping this President, who is the first President to stand up to these robber baron’s and fight for initiatives to reverse what has happened.

Posted by: devilkev | January 25, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Excuse me, but this sounds more like another HANDOUT rather than a Jobs Creation program. Hey Obama, I’m not interested in the cookie. Generate a job for me so I can take care of myself. Now THAT would impress me.

Posted by: WBGSJ | January 25, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

No help at all to me. I already went through caring for elderly parents and raising toddlers at the same time. My parents are gone, my kids are educated from my dollars and back home due to lack of livable wage jobs. Give me true tax reform, either flat tax, value added tax, or lower the tax rates. This doesn’t help those of us who have already done our share of raising families and now need to somehow take care of retirement. IDIOT POLITICIANS who are so removed from day to day life are worthless to the populace.

Posted by: Ken | January 25, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Oh sure….just pacify the masses with a tax cut…..never mind, that’s again, deficit spending!!!!
Obama needs to get some reality. He is so caught up in his “Hollywood act”, that he doesn’t get it!
You can’t cut taxes, in this down economy, because those who are working, have to support unemployment benefits for those who aren’t.
If you don’t provide sufficient relief for the unemployed, you will simply be creating crime, and violence……which we already have seen a marked increase in, and which those who are working, should not want to see an increase in. Things are already bad enough. We would rather pay the taxes.
The economy will not significantly improve before 2014, so we still have a long way to go, to try and keep this country afloat, and to keep some degree of peace, within the country, in the meantime.
The first thing that would make a difference, would be to tax children. People having children are destroying the planet, placing huge burdens on society, because a high percentage of the children are being born to parents who cannot provide for them.
Society can no longer afford to pay for people to have children, who then can’t provide for them.
Raise the taxes for each additional child.
Discontinue child care credits.
Make people face what it really costs to raise children, at their own true expense.
Make school taxes the responsibility of the parents, who actually have children in school. The number one personal property tax cost is for schools. That is wrong. The parents of the children in the schools, should be paying for that education…..not property owners. Owning property, has nothing to do with having children, who must be educated.
Time to stop the free rides, and make people accept responsibility for themselves, and their own actions.
Those who cannot support children, should not be having them. Period.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 25, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

To progressive mama…. everybody
hates Walmart, but everyone shops there.
Pure economics will drive people to
buy where they get the most bang for
their buck. Would you be happy if
they closed and everyone had to buy
their clothes at high end stores
or you had to buy your groceries at
a local corner store where you were
paying double if not triple for it ?
Would you be happy if all those people
who currently work there would be laid
off ? By the way,in talking with
people who do work there, they are
happy. Another shocker, no one has to
work there. They are free to apply at
any other job out there. While I would
agree their clothes are not the
greatest quality, it serves the purpose
of people who are driven to live and
buy what they can afford, rather than
going to the poor house trying to buy
designer clothes. Not everyone thinks
that they are what they buy.

Posted by: wis134 | January 25, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

devilkev…no one wants the change he has tried to deliver. we want the change he promissed and campaigned on.HONEST OPEN GOVERNMENT ON CSPAN. ive been saying it all year JOBS JOBS AND JOBS and if you are paying taxes god bless you and you deserve a cut.OBAMA IS A TALKER AND NOY A DOER> BIG WIND NO MILL.

Posted by: catman | January 25, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Those methods aren’t really gonna create jobs. He must be laughing all the way to the bank. I wish that Obama would tax corporations who keep outsourcing our jobs overseas adn give tax credits to companies who CREATE American jobs. But,nope. He’s not gonna do it,even though he said so on his campaign. Only in lala land.

Posted by: fm65 | January 25, 2010, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Rick McDaniel | Jan 25, 2010 12:57:41 PM posted: “Obama needs to get some reality. He is so caught up in his “Hollywood act”, that he doesn’t get it!”
Libertarians are a hoot. You say, “The first thing that would make a difference, would be to tax children.” Right. That would be HUGELY popular with American families – wonderful political advice for getting anyone voted out of office.
“The number one personal property tax cost is for schools. That is wrong.” Sure, it’s MUCH better for our nation’s competitive position in a global economy to create a class of illiterate, ignorant peasants. But at least we wouldn’t be wasting property taxes. Every man for himself.
And, “Those who cannot support children, should not be having them. Period.” Great idea to promote birth control Rick, but just exactly how do you think this policy would be enforced? Are you familiar with the gruesome history of China’s one child policy? If that doesn’t grate against Libertarian ideals, nothing does.

Posted by: CenterOne | January 25, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

TAX CREDITS ARE JUST “TRANSPARENT” WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION!
Don’t confuse tax credits with tax cuts. The former you receive when you file your tax return (once a year). The latter increases your paycheck (whether weekly, bi-monthly or monthly).
Kathy is correct–”Democrats have done a bangup job creating class warfare-pitting poor against rich.” The Democrats have so many of you believing that the wealthy are not paying their fair share in income taxes. Well according to the latest IRS data (2007–updated July 2009):
The top 5% (7,053,549 returns with a positive Adjusted Gross Income with greater than $160,041 in annual income) accounted for 60.63% of the total federal income tax revenue.
The top 6%-25% (28,214,194 returns with a positive AGI with less than $160,041 and greater than $66,532 in annual income) accounted for 25.96% of the total federal income tax revenue.
While the bottom 75% (105,803,228 returns with a positive AGI with less than $66,532 in annual income) accounted for just 13.41% of the total federal income tax revenue. NOTE: There are reports that the bottom 39% had no tax liability or even a negative tax liability (tax credits exceeded tax liability).

Posted by: James Danley | January 25, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Obama has bribed everyone he can in congress, so now he is turning his sights on the “little people”. We are so stupid that we can’t understand that all he was doing was “for us” so now he is going to try to buy us off. Hopefully, we are too smart to fall for it again.

Posted by: just_the_facts_maam | January 25, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

I would make a bet localy that Obama blames the past administration for all the woes today one year into his administration. I will also bet we will hear the same old promises

Posted by: Jim Rod | January 25, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

parma hts gary said “This is something to put a few more dollars in the hands of the middle class who are the real backbone of this economy” I’m middle class & this does not put one penny in my hands.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 25, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

“The Democrats have so many of you believing that the wealthy are not paying their fair share in income taxes”
The wealthy are not paying their fair share in taxes [not exclusively income]. How can you tell? The middle class has been hammered and we’re still running deficits. The Clinton tax structure was running a surplus. Instead of maintaining those surpluses to pay off the debt, pay into Medicare and SS, Bush gives huge tax cuts to the rich and starts running deficits. -Give huge amounts of potential tax revenue away and then complain Medicare and SS are going broke…you can’t have a safer bet than that!

Posted by: Skip | January 25, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Obama doesn’t get it!! I voted for him because I actually thought he was going to work to correct the unbalanced trade problem and bring manufacturing back to the US. Boy was I wrong!! He isn’t much better than Bush who was only too happy to see American jobs outsourced to China and elsewhere since it made his corporate buddies happy. Putting more burdens on small business will bring this country to a complete collapse. He needs to get tariffs on companies that outsource their manufacturing. He needs to support companies that manufacture here in the US. Washington is bought and paid for by international CEOs. The recent Supreme Court ruling just sealed the deal. Regular Americans count for absolutely nothing when it comes to the congress or the administration.

Posted by: Chris | January 25, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

People can get sex changes and abortions, can I get an age change so that I fit into one of these catagories? By the way, are sex changes paid for on health care. If so, I want to be a guy, because guys usually get work in the construction industry. Then at least I would have a job.
We are the youngest of the baby boomers. What about folks that do not have a dependent, or elderly person to care for. What about over age 50 who are single, not widow, not on retirement, and not employed because no one will hire you at this age. Unemployed for over a year because of the unemployment rate. We never qualify for any Stimulus Checks and we never qualify for any tax credit. We always get the short end of the stick.

Posted by: God hear my prayer | January 25, 2010, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Posted by: James Danley | Jan 25, 2010 1:25:22 PM posted “The Democrats have so many of you believing that the wealthy are not paying their fair share in income taxes.” Once again, we disagree.
Over the past 30 years a gap has opened up between rich and middle class that our country has not seen since the Gilded Age. The last time our nation’s rich took so much income was just before the Great Depression. And, it’s not just income inequity – we’re talking massive amounts of money to twist power politics and promote self-serving ideologies – this income wide gap between the Middle Class and the Uber Wealthy has handicapped our Democracy and rigged our economic system.
Of course taxes should be more skewed to the rich. According to the Wall Street Journal, the top .01% or just 14,000 American families now hold 22.2% of our nation’s wealth — the bottom 90% of us, or over 133 million middle class families, own 4% of the nation’s wealth.
For example, during 8 years of the Bush administration, the 400 richest Americans increased their net worth by $700 BILLION. Do you even have one BILLION dollars? For the rest of us, median household income never recovered from the recession of 2001 at around $30,000 a year.
There are 7,500 households in the United States with annual incomes over $20 Million. Boosting the top tax rate to 50% on annual incomes over $5 million and to 70% on incomes over $10 million would generate an additional $105 billion a year.
Virtually every economics Ph.D. who worked in a prominent role in the Bush Administration acknowledges that the tax cuts enacted during his 2 terms did not pay for themselves. That’s one reason why our nation was forced to borrow TRILLIONS to cover the cost of two preemptive wars.

Posted by: CenterOne | January 25, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Sometimes I agree with the President, sometimes I don’t. This time I am concerned with all who don’t fit in the catagories mentioned. I looked last night on irs.gov to study if I get Stimulus Check this year, last year I did not. This year I won’t either.

Posted by: God hear my prayer | January 25, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

The jobs situation is not always the President fault. Look to your states government. In Florida they are installing new digital water meters, it is a state wide project. The workers that are installing are from North Carolina. Florida has a 11% plus unemployment rate. The Florida legislators could at least see to it that Florida folks get the jobs on state wide projects. Shame on Florida, not shame on the President.

Posted by: God hear my prayer | January 25, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Obama is so out of touch will America he thinks all of the middle class are on welfare.

Posted by: Pablo | January 25, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

“Time to stop the free rides, and make people accept responsibility for themselves, and their own actions.
Those who cannot support children, should not be having them. Period.”
Thank you, Rick McDaniel. I am so tired of subsidizing other people’s reproductive choices.
And for all you child-worshippers who say, “Who’s going to take care of you when you’re old? My little Snotleigh will be paying your Social Security, blah, blah, blah…” I say B*ll.
My prudent savings and investments will far outstrip what will be left of Social Security by the time I’m old. And from what I’ve seen of your kids (I used to work in an HR department), the vast majority don’t have the brains, education, or character to get and hold a job that pays well enough to support themselves, let alone the generation whose taxes subsidized their existence.

Posted by: Alex | January 25, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

when all else fails, go to your Chicago tactics. bribe your way out of the mess.

Posted by: brian | January 25, 2010, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Just one more empty promise. bo you are the biggest joke!

Posted by: watchinbo | January 25, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Obama is so out of touch will America he thinks all of the middle class are on welfare.
________________________________
No, millions of Americans have lost their jobs since the economic crash under the Bush administration. This includes many middle-class people. Also, income for the middle class has decreased while incomes for the top 5% soared over the past decade.

Posted by: tierra | January 25, 2010, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

The real problem is that no one pays attention to the shift in upper-middle and lower class. I believe that now-with inflation being so high, and some jobs paying over 500,000, the class divisions have shifted. Lower class is really making 50,000 or less, middle class is really making 170,000 or less, and then I believe there is an upper-upper class making 500,000 and more….
The tax cuts are ridiculous, because they do not reflect that the working class has shifted. Somoen making 160,000 is not necessarily upper class. With the cost of living, cost of sending children to college, cast of buying a home, and cost of just about everything else these days., it is ridiculous to assume that someone making 160,000 is upper class.

Posted by: Claw123 | January 25, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Spending will NEVER dig us out of this recession. Obama is out of office in 2012.

Posted by: d | January 25, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

It’s not my responsibility to pay for another woman’s abortion or the raising of her children. There’s a multitude of birth control options available in this day and age, many of which are dispensed free or close to it through Planned parenthood. Control and choice, the mantra of the Left, should begin with the control and choice to not get pregnant in the first place if one doesn’t want a child. This attitude would at least cut unplanned pregnancies way back and would be a start.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

=======================
The whole healthcare debacle included Obama negotiating sweetheart deals with special interest groups. Now Obama’s trying to buy the American people with new sweetheart deals.
=======================

Posted by: N Waff | January 25, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

I’m so tired of the government PERIOD!

Posted by: LongT | January 25, 2010, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Claw123: Lower class is more like less than $85K family, $50K individual. These are essentially wages that people cannot survive on without extensive employer benefits (such as health insurance).
Middle class is more like $100K family, $75K individual all the way up to $1M family, $500K individual. This class is way wider than most believe. Even at the top, with taxes being the way they are, you are not going to sock away fortunes.
Upper class is more like $5M family, $1-2M individual. This would encompass all those earning high incomes, etc. – bonuses, and similar compensation. Only at this level can you salt away enough money to make a difference.
Remember that current tax structure slams anyone earning over about $170K, your marginal rate (in most states) is almost 50%. At that rate, anyone accumulating wealth gets taxed so heavily that in all of the best markets it is not worth investing – the downside risk is high and the upside risk is higher with a 50% tax on top.
If the numbers change from what I have said above, we have a society where investment is stifled. You’d have to have lots of extra cash to risk investing it anywhere. A short term gain is taxed too high to make it worth it and a long term gain has got to be good – or it too isn’t worth making the investment.

Posted by: JonF | January 25, 2010, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

It is also clear that Obama hasn’t leaned the lesson from last weeks election in Massachusetts. People are tired of his spending more and more to win votes and so that he can be seen as the “great reformer”. They want a president who is going to cut spending and save this country from extinction.

Posted by: JonF | January 25, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

According to CNN – about 47% of all American taxpayers will not pay a dime in income tax for 2009.
Doesn’t Obama realize that the other 53% that pay ALL the taxes aren’t too thrilled at giving out more credits and making this all more inequitable?
From what I remember, it was something like 20% of people with incomes over $100K pay no tax at all. So this is not about the working poor – it’s about politically aimed taxation policies. No wonder we run up huge deficits – only about half our citizens pay taxes at all!

Posted by: JonF | January 25, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Earth to barry.. hows about helping ALL Americans,not sjut those making under 85000 dollars? Along with housing tax credits for FIRST time home buyers, tyour plan amounts to DISCRIMINATION. he just doesnt get it

Posted by: realman63 | January 25, 2010, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Hows about the government step aside and allow the producers to produce? Hows about we all learn to help ourselves?

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Posted by: Kathy | Jan 25, 2010 4:36:33 PM posted: “There’s a multitude of birth control options available in this day and age, many of which are dispensed free.”
Unfortunately, kids have become poorly informed. They are blasted by meaningless sex advertising without showing real life repercussions. A 2006 CDC study showed that in spite of 8 years federally funded “abstinence only” programs, we saw a rise in the teenage pregnancy rate, the first such increase in 15 years.
So despite a decade of government funded “abstinence only” sex ed programs (costing more than $1.3 BILLION), American children are still having sex, and getting infected with sexually transmitted diseases, and becoming single unmarried, uneducated, unemployed moms.
Enough pandering to the Religious Right – ignoring birth control may be a great way to increase potential church members, but US tax payers should not be picking up religion’s tab. Our Democracy’s future DEMANDS comprehensive sex ed, including all forms of contraception, critical thinking, and family values.

Posted by: CenterOne | January 25, 2010, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

The popular culture will have to change as it has repeatedly throughout history. The garbage that’s thrown out at our youth would have no effect whatsoever if it weren’t watched, read etc. The Left like to try to project the image that they’re above material gain, however they like their wallets as much as anyone else, no matter that they constantly try to project the image that they’re above it. Also, I don’t believe that most young girls are unaware of birth control methods. Many choose not to use those methods as they know there will be no consequences to their actions. Boycott the garbage.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Kathy | Jan 25, 2010 5:40:49 PM posted: “they know there will be no consequences to their actions”.
So what “consequences” do you suggest? I’m not sure about you, but most Americans have a problem with the idea of throwing babies out onto the street. And clearly, 8 years of “be responsible” sex ed did not improve our unwed birthrate.
We have a serious core problem. It’s not just pop culture or what kids see on TV – it’s deteriorating family environments over the past 40 years. This is costing our nation dearly, not just in taxes that support “irresponsible” welfare mommas, It’s destroying educational attainment that is the foundation of America’s economic future.
I encourage everyone to read economist James Heckman’s report called “Schools, Skills, and Synapses”. Heckman shows there are big gaps in educational attainment by age 5. Some babies are raised in a family atmosphere that promotes education, but increasingly many don’t get the “responsibility” structure at home. Heckman’s study shows it is possible by age 5 to predict who will complete college and who won’t.
So this isn’t just a problem we can ignore. As a country we desperately need to improve educational attainment – it results in more tax payers, stronger global competition, and less government handouts for future generations. Isn’t that what we all want regardless of our politics?

Posted by: CenterOne | January 25, 2010, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Jon F – your numbers can’t be correct if Obama is saying he’s going to help the middle class. Most of these credits are for people making under $85,000/year. If you are saying that they are lower class – then either Obama is lying or your figures are wrong.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 25, 2010, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Obama: Double the child care tax credit
Our Greatest Smartest Clueless Leader is so smart and works so hard for our poor working class proletariats. He will take the capitals from you bourgeoisie worms to pay for it.
viva 0bama!

Posted by: skinny dog | January 25, 2010, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Finally, finally! VPJB (Vice President Joe Biden) finally gets his chance, in a year, to do something for us, as Chair of W-T-F on Working Families (Whitehouse Taske Force on Working families). Money are rolling in!

Posted by: huh | January 25, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Exclusive: Obama Would ‘Rather Be Really Good One-Term President’
Is this an oxymoron from our Smartest Clueless Leader? Or is he so smart that he really has no clue what he is talking about. Wait, is that an oxymoron statement, myself?
He thinks he is soooo good that the people will not hire him for the second term!!! Who the hell comes up with the title of W-T-F on working families for our dear VPJB?

Posted by: huh | January 25, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Centerone, believe it or not, we evil conservatives don’t want to step over babies in the streets. Mothers are the ones to teach their daughters so I believe that if a mother is receiving welfare of any kind, she must attend parenting classes as a requirement to continue getting aid. She must instruct her daughters along with sex education available in schools. Just say no hasn’t worked to date. Unwanted pregnancies have always been and probably will always be but doing what we can as a society to cut back on the numbers seems to be a good plan to me. Baby steps to help the situation, to change it gradually. And I am, I’m sure, what you would consider to be a right wing bible thumper.

Posted by: Kathy | January 25, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Posted by: Kathy | Jan 25, 2010 7:00:37 PM posted: “I believe that if a mother is receiving welfare of any kind, she must attend parenting classes as a requirement to continue getting aid. She must instruct her daughters along with sex education available in schools.”
It’s true – “Lefties” and “Bible Thumpers” can agree!
Whether help comes from the biological parents, the church, schools, or American taxpayers, every child needs a focus on the real world science of reproduction.

Posted by: CenterOne | January 25, 2010, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

We lost the concept of individual responsibility in this country, many years ago. We accept no blame for problems of our own making. The government has assumed the mantle of super responsibility, because they “know” what is “best” for us.
If we want to get out of this mess we have to start taking responsibility for ourselves and our communities. Just because you are a citizen does not mean your are entitled to take or share what others have labored for. Welfare was not meant to be a permenant class, which was entitled to free handout forever. Somehow that is what has happened, and now the bill is due. Sadly this issue will never be addressed.

Posted by: pocono | January 25, 2010, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

There are so many things going on in today’s world it is hard to keep up. People see information about taxes thrown all around so often it is hard to follow whats going on. With tax season quickly approaching now is the time to find out whats going on.

Posted by: The Tax Club | January 25, 2010, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

ellsbells930: Obama would know the middle class if he tripped over it. If he was serious about helping people he wouldn’t be thinking of more tax cuts – he would be thinking about ways to generate jobs.
Tax credits aren’t much good for people who don’t have a job.

Posted by: JonF | January 26, 2010, 4:31 am 4:31 am

At least when we have a democrat in office , you see them try to help the middle class and poor of this country , not like the GOP who only care about the rich and how to fill their pocketbooks . I have never seen such a bunch of cry babies and whiners in the GOP in my whole lifetime . I take that back ,they have always been that way!!

Posted by: wdworld51 | January 26, 2010, 5:40 am 5:40 am

JonF – Tax credits aren’t much good for people who don’t have those issues.
1. My kids are all but grown – I can’t use the child care credit.
2. My student loans were paid off 25 years ago.
3. I have a 401K.
4. We make too much to qualify for the saver’s credit.
5. We aren’t taking care of elderly parents (at least not yet).
So what good does it do this middle class family? All it does is make the tax code even more complicated.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 26, 2010, 6:09 am 6:09 am

wdworld51 said “At least when we have a democrat in office , you see them try to help the middle class and poor of this country , not like the GOP who only care about the rich and how to fill their pocketbooks .”
Boy – that gave me a chuckle this morning. You’ve bought into that liberal myth, haven’t you? There is nothing that the Democrats have done to help the middle class. The way to help the middle class is to allow them to keep more of their own money and to be self-sufficient. When Bush proposed tax cuts, EVERYONE who paid taxes got them cut -NOT just the rich. We actually had money in the bank. When I got laid off – it permitted me to work part-time for several years. That isn’t happening now.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 26, 2010, 6:13 am 6:13 am

These tax credits will not help everyone immediatly, but as the middle class people getting the help, start having a little more to spend, the results will trickle, both up, and down. Right now I’m a middle class worker whose sharing my money with the oil cos. paying larger payments to the credit card cos. who want to help me pay my bill off sooner, by raising the monthly payments, and they give me incentives with large penalty fees. I’m sharing with Citi Mortgage helping them by paying excessive fees. Having a little more in the pocket could give a little more to put things on track, and to put more money into the real economy, by going out to eat, or buying cars again. This multiplied by the millions of middle class workers helps everyone eventually. It is a step in the right direction, or should we just give more money to the few rich guys at the top, so they can buy everything and get the economy going. THINK! THINK! THINK!

Posted by: parma hts gary | January 26, 2010, 7:09 am 7:09 am

MORE FLUFFED UP OBAMA WINDOW DRESSING…

Posted by: Dockwobbler | January 26, 2010, 7:14 am 7:14 am

parma hts gary – these credits won’t help this middle class American at all.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 26, 2010, 8:10 am 8:10 am

There is a lack of jobs partially, because no one has money to spend while we’re being raped by the corporations. Putting a few more dollars into a few more pockets, while trying to control people like the bankers, and keeping a restriction on outsourcing, (What the Puppet Masters at FOX calls socialism,) could get people buying again, which means more need, for everything from the restaurant workers, to the retail people, to service, to manufacturing, etc. WHICH = MORE JOBS

Posted by: parma hts gary | January 26, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am

How about parents either taking care of their children themselves or not relying on taxpayer subsidies to pay someone to do it?
I am tired of seeing my tax dollars going to subsidize breeding when our planet and nation are overpopulated and when most parents can’t raise children with basic life skills.
Where’s the tax break for people who didn’t add to overpopulation or who worked their way through college?

Posted by: kvm | January 26, 2010, 10:11 am 10:11 am

“These tax credits will not help everyone immediatly…Having a little more in the pocket could give a little more to put things on track…”
Posted by: parma hts gary | Jan 26, 2010 7:09:51 AM
Tax credits are received when you file your tax returns. Do you honestly believe Congress will pass these tax credits before you file your tax return by April 15th. If not, then IF they make the tax credits retroactive to January 1, 2010, then you will have to file an amended return to receive the tax credits. There is the possibility that the tax credits may not be effective until January 1, 2011. In that case those eligible will have to wait a full year to receive them.
If President Obama and the Democratic Congress really wanted to stimulate the economy they would pass TAX CUTS retroactive to January 1 2010. You would see the increase in your paychecks immediately.
Now I have stated often that a 10% tax cut across-the-board–in addition to making the Bush tax cuts permanent–is needed. However, what they can do is lower the bottom four tax brackets by 1-3 percentage points.
Between…the tax rate would go from to:
$0 and $8,350 from 10% to 9% (10.0% tax cut)
$8,350 and $33,950 from 15% to 13.0% (13.3% tax cut)
$33,950 and $82,250 from 25% to 22.0% (12.0% tax cut)
$82,250 and $171,550 from 28% to 25% (10.7% tax cut)
$171,550 and $372,950 remain 33%
$372,950 and Above remain 35%
Everyone will still receive a tax cut and that will stimulate the economy faster!
For those who continue to claim that tax cuts do not generate revenue, and that the Clinton Administration had such a great economy because of TAX HIKES, there are numerous articles on the Internet that show that it was TAX CUTS during the Clinton Administration that really caused the economy to flourish in the 1990s.

Posted by: James Danley | January 26, 2010, 10:35 am 10:35 am

I am fed up with everything being for those with children. 60% of the children belong to the poor…..who cannot afford them. It is time to stop encouraging irresponsible behavior on the part of the poor.
I was personally responsible, and did not have children, and I am tired of paying for other people’s children.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 26, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

If President Obama and the Democratic Congress really wanted to stimulate the economy they would pass TAX CUTS retroactive to January 1 2010. You would see the increase in your paychecks immediately.
James Danley | Jan 26, 2010 10:35:26 AM
Meanwhile, in documented reality, one of the major tax breaks in the stimulus showed up in paychecks within a month or two of it passing.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 26, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

“Meanwhile, in documented reality, one of the major tax breaks in the stimulus showed up in paychecks within a month or two of it passing.”
Yes, that was an authorization for witholding about $13 less a week from your paycheck. I don’t recall that corresponding tax cut actually having been passed.

Posted by: James Danley | January 26, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

jhw539 said “Meanwhile, in documented reality, one of the major tax breaks in the stimulus showed up in paychecks within a month or two of it passing”
That was not a tax cut. It was simply a change in withholding. Many people are going to be surprised when they fill out their 1040 and find that they owe money. I changed my withholding back to what it was with an override so that I should come close to breakeven.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 26, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Yes, that was an authorization for witholding about $13 less a week from your paycheck. I don’t recall that corresponding tax cut actually having been passed.
James Danley | Jan 26, 2010 2:21:42 PM
You don’t recall? That was $116 billion of the the stimulus “spending”! A $400/$800 payroll tax break in 2009 and 2010. If you don’t “recall” the passage of it, do you also not “recall” the stimulus cost was $787 billion rather than the $671 billion cost it would have been without that tax break?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 26, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Tax credits? Can’t pay your utilities with tax credits.

Posted by: jeff | January 26, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

jhw539 – Again, it was not a tax cut. It was simply a change in the withholding tables. It has been well-documented that people needed to look at their individual tax situation. In a two-income household, there is the potential of owing the IRS over $1,000 when you file your 2009 taxes. It was simply to get cash in hand to stimulate the economy – but any wise person either put it away to pay their taxes or changed their withholding to compensate.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 26, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

I hope Dems get the message: Unless they are prepared to reduce their policies in abstract easy to understand terms no-one is going to comprehend them this includes health care etc. They need to establish a specific website for voters comprehension of each and every policy. This is why people are so easily swayed by the misrepresentations of the Republicans. Also make the synopsis of the policies downloadable.

Posted by: Steve | January 26, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Obammie is an IDIOT if he thinks he can BRIBE the AMERICAN people. Keep your handout obblaha

Posted by: joe averagae | January 26, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Obama Nation = Abomination

Posted by: wis134 | January 26, 2010, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Steve – Most people understand exactly what their policies are. Just because we don’t agree with them, doesn’t mean we don’t understand them. The arrogance of the members of Congress is what doesn’t let them believe that we don’t like what they are trying to do.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 26, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

If I hear one more so called American saying that this W.H. supports socialist policies I’m going to hurl. I guess you idiots would do away with, your local police forces, schools, military, agricultural system and the list goes on. I despise hypocrites and find many on these blogs posing as concerned citizens…give me a break. I say give those people what they want; create a protected area where they can live WITHOUT any of the so called socialist measures and see how well they fare.

Posted by: Ken from Atl | January 26, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Ken from Atl – most of what you listed is LOCALLY controlled. And the military is part of the Constitution. The federal government has no business nor authority being involved in education.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 26, 2010, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Ken from Atl – A quote from Benjamin Franklin “The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.”
With that in mind what wording in the constitution gives the federal government the authority to provide/subsudize health care/insurance?
Just to help you out the powers of the legislative branch are contained in Article 1 Section 8, Article 1 Section 9 list the limits on Congress and Article 1 Section 10 delagate what is not covered in Section 8 to the individual states.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | January 27, 2010, 1:17 am 1:17 am

We have to take the scraps and crumbs where ever we can get them, it’s not like we’re CEO’s or Congress people. Apparrently they are exempt from all hardships.

Posted by: noconfidence | January 27, 2010, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Our country is one default away from destroying the US dollar for good. It is ridiculous to discuss tweaking IRA’s when the money itself will be worthless before year’s end if the Fed doesn’t stop spending now. We should be discussing massive emergency cuts across the board– especially defense. The ‘War on Fear’ has bankrupted us, killed and displaced millions, and saved no one. Every single action to date has been retroactive. They never even bother to ask ‘why’, because they don’t care. Anybody else notice how the only place they didn’t lose jobs last year was in government?

Posted by: h5mind | January 27, 2010, 2:12 am 2:12 am

h5mind – The military is the ONLY thing the Federal government should be spending money on. Constitutionally, it is the only thing that is spelled out as to their having authority. Pretty much everything else is left to the states and the individual.
Why would the federal government lay off people? They want us to all be totally dependent on them for everything – even though they don’t have the right to try & provide it.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 27, 2010, 6:49 am 6:49 am

Duh! Let’s just pass out thousands of dollars to everyone. — It’s not going to happen. The Republicans would give the wealthy free range to make as much money as they like. That was already tried. Free Ennterprise isn’t free. The president is trying to do what he can to get money into the hands of the people that need it most, with the hope the disposable income will generate the economy, which is what we really need to generate the jobs, to generate the economy. etc.

Posted by: parma hts gary | January 27, 2010, 7:17 am 7:17 am

“The Republicans would give the wealthy free range to make as much money as they like. That was already tried. Free Ennterprise isn’t free. The president is trying to do what he can to get money into the hands of the people that need it most, with the hope the disposable income will generate the economy…”
You witnessed last year what happens when the wealthy voluntarily chose to cut their spending (in preparation for Obama’s wealth redistribution plan). It will be a whole lot worse when the Left actually follows through on their assault on the wealthy with income tax hikes, the various surtaxes and compensation caps.
You may not like it, but it is Capitalism, the Entrepreneurial Spirit and Individual Freedom that made the USA the greatest nation on Earth. The American Dream is based on being able to achieve whatever you want–and yes that includes making as much money as you want.

Posted by: James Danley | January 27, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am

obama makes an income of 700,000 dollars

Posted by: unknown | January 27, 2010, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Mr Obama is a LIAR. I am retired military. I did not get any COLA this year. I lost $9.00 in pay because of tax increase. So I do not believe anything this man or any Democrat has to say about no new taxes.

Posted by: Lara | January 28, 2010, 6:45 am 6:45 am

It is ture There is alot of help for the poor, but since i am middel class and make over the 100,000 and each year I save money just too pay off my taxes ,when im in debt with medical bills and etc… I became a mother at a young age, and neaver asked the gov. for anything no foodstamps or anything i worked my butt off b/c I had a child not america and dont get me wrong We cant blame the kids but I do think that they should make a law on poor people haveing kids.

Posted by: pri | January 30, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.