Martha Coakley: ‘We Don’t Know it’s Close’

Go Brown! We need you to help stop the Pelosi and Obama debt explosion!

Well, I guess what you “don’t know”
can’t hurt you. Right, Martha?

oh please, i love how people can in the same breath say polls are inacurate if the support the other candiate and accurate if they support yours. We will see Tuesday if it was close or not. Personally betting the dem will win, but who knows.

The Coakley Campaign, After seeing all the bashing ads on tv for the last 2 weeks i have decided Scott Brown, has my vote. i have not heard one real issue discussed…just bashing and its wrong. So much BS..
Wonder how many other people feel this way too.

Coakley is a proven Candidate? Proven to convict an innocent family for child abuse on evidence that even the tooth fairy couldn’t dream up maybe. And it would be un-Christian to deny health care reform? Yeesh! The group trying to give us health care reform are the Pharisees, for Heaven’s Sake! They propose these things for their own aggrandizement and for their own political gain. Is it really Christian like to enslave the masses in a government run system, after cutting political deals in secrecy to pass it, while allowing unions and politicians to opt out? Hmmmm . . . I don’t think Jesus would see that as loving your neighbor as you love your self.

All I can say is that the limited exposure I have had to Brown, on the news, made me feel rather positive towards him, as a man of some integrity, which is sorely lacking in Washington.
We shall see what the voters decide.

Maybe if Coakley loses, the Dems will decide that 51 votes are a winning number and pass a more progressive health care reform bill? Gotta see the light at the end of the tunnel!

Well, she tied her wagon to Obama. Let’s see how that horse will pull!!

‘You couldn’t be more wrong on BOTH COUNTS!!
Cloaking a vote against a Socialist Obamacare as un-christian, is VERY UN-CHRISTIAN!!’
Haha, I love how Americans never understand good sarcasm.
Dooraks…

“We don’t know it’s close — I just disagree that the polls are accurate,” said Coakley, the Massachusetts attorney general.
Sounds like she is in a little bit of denial, don’t you think? If Obama doesn’t go up to campaign, you know its over. It’ll be interesting to see if he does. I’m betting on a nail biter, hopefully with Brown coming out on top unless of course the Obama goons send Acorn in to do their dirty work!

Coakley’s an idiot, liar, or wishful thinker, probably all three.
Massachusetts has a chance to make history. The tide turned right here…
I trust Bay State AMERICANS to check the spread of PapaDoc Obamistide kleptosocialism on Tuesday.

I’m in Massachusetts.
Allow me to explain what’s happening here in a nutshell.
There have been nine polls conducted on this race. Brown is ahead in exactly ONE – a Suffolk poll. The same disreputable polling firm that thought Corzine was ahead by 9 points just days before the NJ election. Go that? ONE POLL has him ahead. Another has him in a TIE with Coakley. She is ahead by high single digits or double digits in EVERY OTHER POLL. Look it up.
To wit:
The GMB/Research 2000 poll that came out TODAY has Coakley up by 8 points.
What’s happening here in Mass. is that we’re letting the GOP be loud and obnoxious until Tuesday. And then we’re going to elect Coakley. The only people I’ve heard who would vote for Brown are Republicans and a few indies. The indies here lean Democrat – and they’re going for Coakley. WE HAVEN’T FORGOTTEN WHAT BUSH DID TO US IN LESS THAN A YEAR.
Coakley wins Tuesday. COUNT ON IT.

1) Brown will win by 4 and
2) “coakleyed” will be the newest verb!

I live in Massachusetts and it is full of liberals. I’m a Brown voter, but not very confident he will win. This state is just way to Democratic. It would be great if she could win so we could stop universal romneycare.

First and foremost, the source of our current economic crisis is the rapidly falling purchasing power of the middle class due to their increased burden of out-of-pocket medical expenses and lack of salary increases due to rapidly increasing employer healthcare costs. Even libertarian economists like John Williams of shadowstats.com have identified for years the widening structural gap between the falling purchasing power of the middle class and the needed level of purchases of goods and services to keep our economy afloat. This gap was filled under Greenspan by rapidly expanding consumer and corporate credit and more recently by rapidly expanding Federal credit. Neither are sustainable and both paths lead to disaster — we must control healthcare costs now if we are to save ourselves and our country.
How does Obamacare reduce costs? Both the House and Senate bills cap large insurer’s retained premium take at 15%. This is about half of what they retain now, but even more important, it removes the need for a large number of employees of health care providers whose assignment is to fight with their counterparts in the insurance companies to get claims paid.
Also the primary savings in Medicare are in eliminating Medicare Advantage and having Medicare insure directly. This reduces the retained premiums from 30% to 5% as well as eliminating the need for extra employees at health care providers to fight to get claims paid. The payments seen by doctors would not change while their costs would go down.
I could go on with other elements such as union workers getting less Cadillac coverage and receiving greater salaries with which they can buy more goods and services or eliminating the ban on negotiated drug prices which would save the US $40 billion a year without costing the Pharmaceutical companies a cent (US costs would drop by 28% and foreign costs would rise by 14% if everyone paid the same and pharma had the same gross).
But I think you get the idea — failure to address healthcare now will delay reform past the point of no return financially.
These political war games have got to stop — the country is setting itself up for a “last election” such as the ones that elected Hitler or Hamas.
When enough people become disenfranchised, they will follow a demagogue and our noble democratic experiment will be at an end.
Think I am being overdramatic — I bring to your attention two recent polls
1. 50% of those queried said they could not raise $2000 on an emergency basis given 30 days.
2. Voters already favor the Tea Party Movement (i.e. the party of the disenfranchised) over both the Democratic and Republican parties.